Book contents
- The Athenian Funeral Oration
- The Athenian Funeral Oration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Funeral Oration after Loraux
- Part I Contexts
- Part II The Historical Speeches
- Part III The Literary Examples
- Part IV Intertextuality
- Part V The Language of Democracy
- References
- General Index
- Index of Sources
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2024
Edited by
Foreword by
Book contents
- The Athenian Funeral Oration
- The Athenian Funeral Oration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Funeral Oration after Loraux
- Part I Contexts
- Part II The Historical Speeches
- Part III The Literary Examples
- Part IV Intertextuality
- Part V The Language of Democracy
- References
- General Index
- Index of Sources
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Athenian Funeral OrationAfter Nicole Loraux, pp. 436 - 475Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Adams, C. D. 1912. ‘Are the political speeches of Demosthenes to be regarded as political pamphlets?’ TAPhA 43: 5–22.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1972. Moral Values and Political Behaviour in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the End of the Fifth Century. London.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E. 2002. Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscape, Monuments and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alexiou, E. 2009. ‘Das Proömium des isokratischen Euagoras und die Epitaphienreden’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 33: 31–52.Google Scholar
Alexiou, E. 2015. ‘The rhetoric of Isocrates’ Euagoras: history, ethics and politics’, in Isocrate: entre jeu rhétorique et enjeux politiques, eds. Bouchet, C. and Giovanelli-Jouanna, P.. Lyon: 47–57.Google Scholar
Allan, W. 2001. Euripides The Children of Heracles with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Warminster.Google Scholar
Allan, W. and Kelly, A. 2013. ‘Listening to many voices: Athenian tragedy as popular art’, in The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, eds. Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J.. Oxford: 77–122.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. 1970. ‘Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’État (Notes pour une recherche)’, La Pensée 150: 3–38.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. 2010. ‘The reading order of Plato’s dialogues’, Phoenix 64: 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. 2003. The Athenian Experiment: Building an Imagined Political Community in Ancient Attica: 508–490 B.C. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Arnason, J. P. 2014. ‘Social imaginary significations’, in Cornelius Castoriadis: Key Concepts, ed. Adams, S.. London: 23–42.Google Scholar
Arrington, N. T. 2010. ‘Topographic semantics: the location of the Athenian public cemetery and its significance for the nascent democracy’, Hesperia 79: 499–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrington, N. T. 2011. ‘Inscribing defeat: the commemorative dynamics of the Athenian casualty lists’, ClAnt 30: 179–212.Google Scholar
Arrington, N. T. 2014. ‘Fallen vessels and risen spirits: conveying the presence of the dead on white-ground lekythoi’, in Athenian Potters and Painters: Volume III, ed. Oakley, J. H.. Oxford: 1–10.Google Scholar
Arrington, N. T. 2015. Ashes, Images and Memories: The Presence of the War Dead in Fifth-Century Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Arrington, N. T. 2018. ‘Touch and remembrance in Greek funerary art’, ABull 100: 7–27.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. 1999. Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. 1999. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich.Google Scholar
Atack, C. 2018b. ‘Imagined superpowers: Isocrates’ opposition of Athens and Sparta’, in The Greek Superpower: Sparta in the Self-Definition of Athenians, eds. Powell, A. and Cartledge, P.. Swansea: 157–84.Google Scholar
Austin, M. M. and Vidal-Naquet, P. 1977. Economic and Social History of Ancient Greece: An Introduction, rev. and tr. M. M. Austin. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Avgousti, A. 2018. ‘A text for the city: Plato’s Menexenus and the legacy of Pericles’, Polity 50: 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulay, V. 2017. The Tyrant-Slayers of Ancient Athens: A Tale of Two Statues, tr. J. Lloyd. Oxford.Google Scholar
Azoulay, V. and Ismard, P. 2007. ‘Les lieux du politique dans l’Athènes classique: entre structures institutionnelles, idéologie civique et pratiques sociales’, in Athènes et le politique: dans le sillage de Claude Mossé, eds. Schmitt Pantel, P. and de Polignac, F.. Paris: 271–309.Google Scholar
Bakewell, G. W. 1999. ‘Lysias 12 and Lysias 31: Metics and Athenian citizenship in the aftermath of the thirty’, GRBS 40: 5–22.Google Scholar
Bakewell, G. W. 2007. ‘Written lists of military personnel in classical Athens’, in Politics of Orality, ed. Cooper, C.. Leiden: 89–101.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. 2010. ‘Democratizing courage in classical Athens’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 88–108.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. 2014. Courage in the Democratic Polis: Ideology and Critique in Classical Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barbato, M. 2020. The Democratic Ideology of Democratic Athens: Institutions, Orators and the Mythical Past. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Barringer, J. M. 2014. ‘Athenian state monuments for the war dead: evidence from a loutrophoros’, in Approaching the Ancient Artifact: Representation, Narrative and Function, eds. Avramidou, A. and Demetriou, D.. Berlin: 91–104.Google Scholar
Battezzato, L. 2016. ‘Euripides the antiquarian’, in Wisdom and Folly in Euripides, eds. Kyriakou, P. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin: 3–14.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and Royle, N. 2009. An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory, 4th ed. Harlow.Google Scholar
Bérard, C. 1982. ‘Récupérer la mort du prince: héroïsation et la formation de la cité’, in La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes, eds. Gnoli, G. and Vernant, J.-P.. Cambridge and Paris: 89–106.Google Scholar
Bérard, C. et al. (eds.) 1989. A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece, tr. D. Lyons. Princeton.Google Scholar
Bergemann, J. 1996. ‘Die sogenannte Lutrophoros: Grabmal für unverheiratete Tote?’ MDAI(A) 111: 149–90.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R. 2003. Luxuskritik und Aufwandsbeschränkungen in der griechischen Welt. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. 2001. ‘La memoria storica di Aristofane’, in Storiografia locale e storiografia universal: forme di acquisizione del sapere storico nella cultura antica, eds. Bearzot, C. S., Vattuone, R. and Ambaglio, D.. Como: 41–99.Google Scholar
Binder, V., Korenjak, M., and Noack, B. (eds.) 2007. Epitaphien: Tod, Totenrede, Rhetorik. Auswahl, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Rahden.Google Scholar
Blank, T. G. M. 2014. Logos und Praxis: Sparta als politisches Exemplum in den Schriften des Isokrates. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Blank, T. G. M. 2017. ‘Counsellor, teacher, friend: the apragmōn as political figure in Isocrates’, in Conseillers et ambassadeurs dans l’antiquité, eds. Queyrel Bottinean, A. and Guelfucci, M.-L.. Besançon: 263–90.Google Scholar
Blank, T. G. M. 2018. ‘Innere Kritiker und welche Umwelt? Intellektuelle zwischen Dissidenz und Systemstabilisierung im Athen des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, in Feindbild und Vorbild: Die athenische Demokratie und ihre intellektuellen Gegner, eds. Jordovic, I. and Walter, U.. Berlin and New York: 70–106.Google Scholar
Blanshard, A. J. L. 2007. ‘The problem with honouring Samos: an Athenian document relief and its interpretation’, in Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World, eds. Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R.. Cambridge: 19–37.Google Scholar
Blanshard, A. J. L. 2010. ‘War in the law-court: some Athenian discussions’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 203–24.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1887. Die Attische Beredsamkeit: Erste Abteilung: Von Gorgias bis zu Lysias, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1892. Die Attische Beredsamkeit: Zweite Abteilung: Isokrates Isaios, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1893. Die Attische Beredsamkeit: Dritte Abteilung: Erster Abschnitt: Demosthenes, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1898. Die Attische Beredsamkeit: Dritte Abteilung: Zweiter Abschnitt: Demosthenes’ Genossen und Gegner, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, B. 1998. Athens Weg in die Niederlage: Die letzten Jahre des Peloponnesischen Kriegs. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Blundell, M. W. 1993. ‘The ideal of Athens in Oedipus at Colonus’, in Tragedy, Comedy and the Polis: Papers from the Greek Drama Conference: Nottingham 18–20 July 1990, eds. Sommerstein, A. H., Halliwell, S., Henderson, J. and Zimmermann, B.. Bari: 287–306.Google Scholar
Börm, H. 2019. Mordende Mitbürger: Stasis und Bürgerkrieg in griechischen Poleis des Hellenismus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Börm, H., Mattheis, M. and Wienand, J. (eds.) 2016. Civil War in Ancient Greece and Rome: Contexts of Disintegration and Reintegration. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 2000. ‘The historical context of Thucydides’ funeral oration’, JHS 120: 1–16.Google Scholar
Bouchet, C. 2014. Isocrate l’Athénien, ou la belle hégémonie: étude des relations internationales au IVe siècle av. J.–C. Pessac.Google Scholar
Bourriot, F. 1972. ‘La considération accordée aux marins dans l’antiquité grecque: époque archaïque et classique’, Revue d’histoire économique et sociale 1: 7–41.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. 1991. ‘Poets and their patrons’, in Fragmenta Dramatica: Beiträge zur Interpretation der griechischen Tragikerfragmente und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte, eds. Harder, A and Hofmann, H.. Göttingen: 139–60.Google Scholar
Brillet-Dubois, P. 2010. ‘Astyanax et les orphelins de guerre athéniens: critique de l’idéologie de la cité dans les Troyennes d’Euripide’, REG 123: 29–50.Google Scholar
Brock, R. 1998. ‘Mythical polypragmosyne in Athenian drama and rhetoric’, BICS 71: 227–38.Google Scholar
Brun, P. 2015. Démosthène: rhétorique, pouvoir et corruption à Athènes, 1st ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruni, L. 1996. Leonardo Brunis Rede auf Nanni Strozzi: Einleitung, Edition und Kommentar, tr. S. Daub. Leipzig and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bruzzone, R. 2018. ‘Thucydides’ great harbor battle as literary tomb’, AJP 139: 577–604.Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. 2012. Gorgias von Leontinoi: Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien, 2nd ed. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Buchner, E. 1958. Der Panegyrikos des Isokrates: Eine historisch-philologische Untersuchung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Budelacci, O. 2005. ‘Destabilisierung und Orientierung: Die Präambel des Verfassungsvertrages der Europäischen Union’, in Die Werte Europas. Verfassungspatriotismus und Wertegemeinschaft in der EU?, ed. Heit, H.. Münster: 179–94.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. A. 1995. ‘Söldner und Bürger als Soldaten für Athen’, in Die athenische Demokratie im. 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr.: Vollendung oder Verfall einer Verfassungsform? Akten eines Symposiums 3.–7. August 1992, Bellagio, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 107–33.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. A. 1996. Bürger und Soldaten: Aspekte der politischen und militärischen Rolle athenischer Bürger und Soldaten im Kriegswesen des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Burian, P. 1985. ‘Logos and pathos: the politics of the Suppliant Women’, in Directions in Euripidean Criticism, ed. Burian, P.. Durham: 129–155.Google Scholar
Burian, P. 2011. ‘Athenian tragedy as democratic discourse’, in Why Athens? A Reappraisal of Tragic Politics, ed. Carter, D. M.. Oxford: 95–118.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. 1976. ‘Tribe and city, custom and decree in Children of Heracles’, CPh 71: 4–26.Google Scholar
Butera, C. J. 2010. ‘“The land of the fine triremes”: naval identity and polis imaginary in fifth-century Athens’, PhD thesis, Duke University (Durham).Google Scholar
Caire, C. 2016. Penser l’oligarchie à Athènes aux Ve et IVe siècles: aspects d’une idéologie. Paris.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 1993. Aidōs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 2019. ‘Honour and kingship in Herodotus: status, role and the limits of self-assertion’, Frontiers of Philosophy in China 14: 75–93.Google Scholar
Cairns, H. A. C. 1965. Prelude to Imperialism: British Reactions to Central African Society 1840–1890. London.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1996. Thésée et l’imaginaire athénien: légende et culte en Grèce antique, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2011. ‘Myth and performance on the Athenian stage: Praxithea, Erechtheus, their daughters and the etiology of autochthony’, CPh 106: 1–19.Google Scholar
Calinescu, M. 1993. ‘Orality in literacy: some historical paradoxes of reading’, YJC 6: 176–90.Google Scholar
Canevaro, M. 2016. ‘The popular culture of Athenian institutions: “authorized” popular culture and “unauthorized” elite culture in classical Athens’, in Popular Culture in the Ancient World, ed. Grig, L.. Cambridge: 39–65.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2006. Democracy in Europe: A History of an Ideology, tr. S. Jones. Malden and Oxford.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2011b. ‘L’epitafio in morte di Leostene e la “guerra lamiaca”’, QS 73: 5–28.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2012. ‘Per la storia del testo dell’ “Epitafio” attribuito a Iperide: (Papiro Stobart)’, RSI 124: 165–92.Google Scholar
Capogrossi, L., Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds.) 1978. Analisi marxista e società antiche. Rome.Google Scholar
Carden-Coyne, A. 2003. ‘Gendering death and renewal: classical monuments of the First World War’, Humanities Research 10: 40–50.Google Scholar
Carden-Coyne, A. 2009. Reconstructing the Body: Classicism, Modernism and the First World War. Oxford.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2007a. ‘Epideictic oratory’, in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, ed. Worthington, I.. Malden: 236–52.Google Scholar
Carey, C., Edwards, M., Farkas, Z., Herrman, J., Horváth, L., Mayer, G., Mészáros, T., Rhodes, P. J. and Tchernetska, N. 2008. ‘Fragments of Hyperides’ Against Diondas from the Archimedes Palimpsest’, ZPE 165: 1–19.Google Scholar
Cargill, J. 1981. The Second Athenian League: Empire or Free Alliance? Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. 1997. ‘“Deep plays”: theatre as process in Greek civic life’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. Easterling, P.. Cambridge: 3–35.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. 1998. ‘The machismo of the Athenian empire: or the reign of the phaulos’, in When Men Were Men: Masculinity, Power and Identity in Classical Antiquity, eds. Foxhall, L. and Salmon, J.. London and New York: 54–67.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C. 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society, tr. K. Blamey. Oxford and Cambridge (Massachusetts).Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C. 2011. Ce qui fait la Grèce: Tome 3: Thucydide, la force et le droit. Paris.Google Scholar
Castriota, D. 1992. Myth, Ethos and Actuality: Official Art in Fifth-Century BC Athens. Madison.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. 1993. ‘Sans thalassocratie, pas de démocratie? Le rapport entre thalassocratie et démocratie à Athènes dans la discussion du Ve et IVe siècle av. J.-C.’, Historia 42: 444–70.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, S. 2019. ‘Demos “molgos” e Cleone, amante del dēmos: storia e senso di un’immagine di Aristofane’, RFIC 147: 290–330.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. 1968. ‘La terminologia sociopolitica di Teognide: l’opposizione semantica tra AGATHOS-ESTHLOS e KAKOS-DEILOS’, QUCC 6: 7–32.Google Scholar
Champagne, R. 2015. The Methods of the Gernet Classicists: The Structuralists on Myth. London.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A., Kaltsas, N., and Mylonopoulos, I. (eds.) 2017. A World of Emotions: Ancient Greece, 700 BC–200 AD. New York.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, P. 2012. ‘La parrhēsia chez Isocrate: l’intellectuel et la liberté de parole dans l’Athènes du IVe s. av. J.-C.’, Tekmēria 11, 89–114.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, P. 2015. “Κατασκευάζοντας το Πάρελθον: Η θέση του Μύθου στην πολιτική σκέψη του Ισοκράτη”, in Μυθοπλασίες: Χρήση και πρόσληψη των Αρχαίων Μύθων στην Αρχαιότητα, το Βυζάντιο και τη νεότερη ιστορία, λογοτεχνία και τέχνη, eds. Petridis, A. and Euthymiadis, C.. Athens: 81–108.Google Scholar
Clairmont, C. W. 1983. Patrios Nomos: Public Burial in Athens during the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BC: The Archaeological, Epigraphic-Literary and Historical Evidence, 2 volumes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clavaud, R. 1974. Démosthène, discours d’apparat: Epitaphios et Eroticos: Texte établi et traduit. Paris.Google Scholar
Clements, J. H. 2015. ‘Visualizing autochthony: the iconography of Athenian identity in the late fifth century BCE’, PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 2009. ‘The Eleusinian sanctuary during the Peloponnesian War’, in Art in Athens during the Peloponnesian War, ed. Palagia, O.. Cambridge: 52–65.Google Scholar
Coin-Longeray, S. 2014. ‘Pénès et ptôchos: le pauvre et le mendiant: deux figures de la pauvreté dans la poésie grecque ancienne’, in La pauvreté en Grèce ancienne: formes, représentations, enjeux, eds. Galbois, E. and Rougier-Blanc, S.. Bordeaux: 45–65.Google Scholar
Collard, C. and Cropp, M.. 2008. Euripides: Fragments: Aegeus-Meleager. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London.Google Scholar
Collins, J. H. 2015. Exhortations to Philosophy: The Protreptics of Plato, Isocrates and Aristotle. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. 2017. When They Go Low, We Go High: Speeches That Shape the World – And Why We Need Them. London.Google Scholar
Collins, S. D. and Stauffer, D.. 1999. ‘The challenge of Plato’s Menexenus’, Review of Politics 61: 85–115.Google Scholar
Connelly, J. B. 1996. ‘Parthenon and parthenoi: a mythological interpretation of the Parthenon frieze’, AJA 100: 53–80.Google Scholar
Connelly, J. B. 2014. The Parthenon Enigma: A New Understanding of the World’s Most Iconic Building and the People Who Made It. New York.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. 1970. ‘Theseus in classical Athens’, in The Quest for Theseus, ed. Ward, A.. New York: 143–71.Google Scholar
Conomis, N. C. 1970. Lycurgi Oratio in Leocratem: Cum Ceterarum Lycurgi Orationum Fragmentis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Constant, B. 1988 [1816]. ‘The liberty of ancients compared with that of moderns’, in Constant: Political Writings, ed. and tr. B. Fontana. Cambridge: 308–28.Google Scholar
Cook, M. L. 1990. ‘Timocrates’ 50 talents and the cost of ancient warfare’, Eranos 88: 69–97.Google Scholar
Croally, N. 1994. Euripidean Polemic: The Trojan Women and the Function of Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cropp, M. J. 1995. ‘Erechtheus’, in Euripides: Selected Fragmentary Plays: Volume I, eds. Collard, C., Cropp, M. J. and Lee, K.. Warminster: 148–94.Google Scholar
Cropp, M. J. 2014. ‘Cropp on Queyrel on Connelly’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, October no. 45.Google Scholar
Crowley, J. 2012. The Psychology of the Athenian Hoplite: The Culture of Combat in Classical Athens. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, J. 2014. ‘Beyond the universal soldier: combat trauma in classical antiquity’, in Combat Trauma and the Ancient Greeks, eds. Meineck, P. and Konstan, D.. New York: 105–30.Google Scholar
Cuniberti, G. 2015. ‘Isocrate e la storia ateniese del V secolo’, in Isocrate: entre jeu rhétorique et enjeux politiques, eds. Bouchet, C. and Giovanelli-Jouanna, P.. Lyon: 203–16.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. 1990. ‘Isocrates against imperialism: an analysis of the De Pace’, Historia 39: 20–36.Google Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1975. ‘Karl Marx and the history of classical antiquity’, Arethusa 8: 7–41.Google Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1981. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World from the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquests. London.Google Scholar
De Vries, W. 1892. A Rhetorical Study of the Types of Character in the Orations of Lysias. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Debnar, P. 2018. ‘Sparta in Pericles’ funeral oration’, in The Greek Superpower: Sparta in the Self-Definitions of Athenians, eds. Cartledge, P. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 1–32.Google Scholar
Demetriou, K. N. 1999. George Grote on Plato and Athenian Democracy: A Study in Classical Reception. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1968. ‘La phalange: problèmes et controverses’, in Problèmes de la guerre en Grèce ancienne, ed. Vernant, J.-P.. Paris: 119–42.Google Scholar
Di Pierro, M. 2016. ‘Totalité et démocratie: Claude Lefort avec et après Marx’, Cahiers de philosophie de l’université de Caen 53: 155–68.Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: Griechisch und Deutsch; Zweiter Band. Hrsg. von W. Kranz, 6th ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dirks, N. B., Eley, G. and Ortner, S. B. 1994. ‘Introduction’, in Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, eds. Dirks, N. B., Eley, G. and Ortner, S. B.. Princeton: 3–46.Google Scholar
DuBois, P. 1982. Centaurs and Amazons: Women and the Prehistory of the Great Chain of Being. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ducrey, P. 2019. Polemica: études sur la guerre et les armées dans la Grèce ancienne, with chapters by C. Brélaz and C. Calame. Paris.Google Scholar
Earley, B. 2020. The Thucydidean Turn: (Re)interpreting Thucydides’ Political Thought before, during and after the Great War. London.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. 1997. ‘Constructing the heroic’, in Greek Tragedy and the Historian, ed. Pelling, C.. Oxford: 21–37.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 2000. ‘Antiphon and the beginnings of Athenian literary oratory’, Rhetorica 18: 227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, V. 1951. The People of Aristophanes: A Sociology of Old Attic Comedy, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, V. 1973. From Solon to Socrates: Greek History and Civilization during the Sixth and Fifth Centuries BC, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Engels, J. 1998. Funerum sepulcrorumque magnificentia: Begräbnis und Grabluxusgesetze in der griechisch-römischen Welt mit einigen Ausblicken auf Einschränkungen des funeralen und sepulkralen Luxus im Mittelalter und in der Neuzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ensoli, S. 1987. L’Heróon di Dexileos nel ceramico di Atene: Problematica architettonica e artistica attica degli inizi del IV secolo A.C. Rome.Google Scholar
Erll, A., and Nünning, A. (eds.) 2008. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. 1983. Isokrates: Seine Positionen in den Auseinandersetzungen mit den zeitgenössischen Philosophen. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. 2003. ‘Die Doppeldeutigkeit des platonischen Menexenos’, Hyperboreus 9: 44–55.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. 2010. ‘Der platonische Menexenos und der Panegyrikos des Isokrates’, Museum Helveticum 67: 131–45.Google Scholar
Fantasia, U. 2003. Tucidide: La Guerra del Peloponneso: Libro II: Testo, traduzione e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. J. 1991. Athens and Aigina in the Age of Imperial Colonization. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1954. ‘Introduction’, in History of the Peloponnesian War, tr. R. Warner. Harmondsworth and Baltimore: 9–32.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1968. ‘Sparta’, in Problèmes de la guerre en Grèce ancienne, ed. Vernant, J.-P.. Paris: 143–60.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1976. Démocratie antique et démocratie moderne, tr. M. Alexandre. Paris.Google Scholar
Fitton, J. W. 1961. ‘The Suppliant Women and the Herakleidai of Euripides’, Hermes 89: 430–61.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. 1969. Der Epitaphios des Perikles: Seine Funktion im Geschichtswerk des Thukydides. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Flory, S. 1990. ‘The meaning of to mē muthōdes (1.22.4) and the usefulness of Thucydides’ History’, CJ 85: 193–208.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A. 2000. ‘From Simonides to Isocrates: the fifth-century origins of fourth-century panhellenism’, ClAnt 19: 65–101.Google Scholar
Forrest, W. G. 1986. ‘The stage and politics’, in Greek Tragedy and its Legacy: Essays Presented to D. J. Conacher, eds. Cropp, M. J., Fantham, E. and Scully, S. E.. Calgary: 229–39.Google Scholar
Forsdyke, S. 2005. Exile, Ostracism and Democracy: The Politics of Expulsion in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1969a. ‘Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?’, Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie 63: 73–104.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. ‘What is an author?’, in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, ed. Bouchard, F.. New York: 113–38.Google Scholar
Francis, E. D. 1990. Image and Idea in Fifth-Century Greece: Art and Literature after the Persian Wars. London and New York.Google Scholar
Frangeskou, V. 1998–9. ‘Tradition and originality in some Attic funeral orations’, CW 92: 315–36.Google Scholar
Frisone, F. 2000. Leggi e Regolamenti Funerari nel Mondo Greco: I. Le Fonti Epigraphiche. Lecce.Google Scholar
Gabrielsen, V. 2002. ‘Socio-economic classes and ancient Greek warfare’, in Ancient History Matters: Studies Presented to Jens Erik Skydsgaard on His Seventieth Birthday, eds. Ascani, K., Gabrielsen, V., Kvist, K. and Rasmussen, A. H.. Rome: 203–20.Google Scholar
Gaca, K. 2010. ‘The andrapodizing of war captives in Greek historical memory’, TAPhA 140: 117–61.Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. 1975. Das Staatsmodell des Thukydides: Zur Rede des Perikles für die Gefallenen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Gallego, J. 2019. ‘De la volonté tragique à l’action politique: la décision subjective dans la démocratie athénienne’, in Relire Vernant, eds. Georgoudi, S. and de Polignac, F.. Paris: 227–48.Google Scholar
Gamble, R. B. 1970. ‘Euripides’ “Suppliant Women”: decision and ambivalence’, Hermes 98: 385–405.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. 1993. Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources, 2 volumes. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Garland, R. 1989. ‘The well-ordered corpse: an investigation in the motives behind Greek funerary legislation’, BICS 36: 1–15.Google Scholar
Garofoli, J. 2006. ‘Film touches deep nerve for families of Flight 93 victims’, https://www.sfgate.com/politics/joegarofoli/article/Film-touches-deep-nerve-for-families-of-Flight-93-2499479.php.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J 1985. Stasis: Untersuchungen zu den inneren Kriegen in den griechischen Staaten des 5. und 4. Jh. v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J 2001. ‘Mythos, history and collective identity: uses of the past in ancient Greece and beyond’, in The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, ed. Luraghi, N.. Oxford: 286–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J 2013. ‘Theoroi in und aus Olympia: Beobachtungen zur religiösen Kommunikation in der archaischen Zeit’, Klio 95: 40–60.Google Scholar
Gensheimer, M. B. 2017. ‘Metaphors for Marathon in the sculptural program of the Athenian Treasury at Delphi’, Hesperia 86: 1–42.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. and Bizos, M. 1924. Lysias Discours: Tome I (I–XV): Texte établi et traduit, 1st ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. and Bizos, M. 1955. Lysias Discours: Tome I (I–XV): Texte établi et traduit, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Gillis, D. 1971. ‘Isocrates’ Panegyricus: the rhetorical texture’, Wiener Studien 84: 52–73.Google Scholar
Giombini, S. 2012. Gorgia epidittico: commento filosofico all’Encomio di Elena, all’Apologia di Palamede, all’Epitaffio. Passignano sul Trasimeno.Google Scholar
Girard, J. 1872a. ‘Sur l’authenticité de l’oraison funèbre attribuée a Lysias’, RA 23: 373–89.Google Scholar
Girard, J. 1872b. ‘Sur l’authenticité de l’oraison funèbre attribuée a Lysias (Suite et fin)’, RA 24: 4–14.Google Scholar
Giudice, F. 2000, ‘Il bronzo A di Riace, una lekythos del Pittore di Achille, ed il problema degli “state burials”’, in From the Parts to the Whole: Acts of the 13th International Bronze Congress: Volume I, eds. Mattusch, C. C., Brauer, A. and Knudsen, S. E.. JRA Supp. 39: 117–23.Google Scholar
Giudice, F. 2002. ‘Demosion sema e resistenze aristocratiche’, in Iconografia 2001: Studi sull’ immagine, eds. Colpo, I., Favaretto, I. and Ghedini, F.. Rome: 179–88.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. (ed.) 1970. Sur les sociétés précapitalistes: textes choisis de Marx, Engels et Lénine. Paris.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1990. ‘The Great Dionysia and civic ideology’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context, eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton: 97–129.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1997. ‘The audience of Athenian tragedy’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. Easterling, P.. Cambridge: 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2000. ‘Civic ideology and the problem of difference: the politics of Aeschylean tragedy, once again’, JHS 120: 34–56.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1945. A Historical Commentary on Thucydides: Volume I: Introduction and Commentary on Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1956. A Historical Commentary on Thucydides: Volume II: The Ten Years’ War: Books II–III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Götte, H. R. 2009. ‘Images in the Athenian dēmosion sēma’, in Art in Athens during the Peloponnesian War, ed. Palagia, O.. Cambridge: 188–206.Google Scholar
Gotteland, S. 2001. Mythe et rhétorique: les examples mythiques dans le discours politique de l’Athènes classique. Paris.Google Scholar
Gottraux, P. 1997. ‘Socialisme ou barbarie’: un engagement politique et intellectuel dans la France de l’après-guerre. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1983. ‘Homeric epic and the tragic moment’, in Aspects of the Epic, eds. Winnifrith, T., Murray, P. and Gransden, K. W.. London: 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A. 2007. What Was History? The Art of History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graham, A. J. and Forsythe, G. 1984. ‘A new slogan for oligarchy in Thucydides 3.82.8’, HSPh 88: 24–45.Google Scholar
Gray, B. 2015. Stasis and Stability: Exile, the Polis and Political Thought, c. 404–146 BC. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2003. Asyl und Athen: Die Konstruktion kollektiver Identität in der griechischen Tragödie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2005. ‘Gefahren des logos: Thukydides’ “Historien” und die Grabredes des Perikles’, Klio 87: 41–71.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010. The Greeks and their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BCE. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1985. ‘Brilliant dynasts: power and politics in the “Oresteia”’, ClAnt 14: 62–129.Google Scholar
Grote, G. 1862. History of Greece: Earliest Period to the Close of the Generation Contemporary with Alexander the Great: Volume IV, new ed. London.Google Scholar
Grote, O. 2016. Die griechischen Phylen: Funktion – Entstehung – Leistungen. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habicht, C. 1997. Athens from Alexander to Antony, tr. D. L. Schneider. Cambridge (Massachusetts).Google Scholar
Hajdú, I. 2002. Kommentar zur 4. Philippischen Rede des Demosthenes: Texte und Kommentare 23. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. 1993. ‘Asia unmanned: images of victory in classical Athens’, in War and Society in the Greek World, eds. Rich, J. and Shipley, G.. London and New York: 108–34.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. 1996. Aeschylus Persians: Edited with Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. 2007. ‘Greek tragedy 430–380 BC’, in Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: Art, Literature, Philosophy and Politics, 430–380 BC, ed. Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 264–87.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2008. Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2014. ‘Laughter’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy, ed. Revermann, M.. Cambridge: 189–205.Google Scholar
Hamel, D. 1998. Athenian Generals: Military Authority in the Classical Period. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. 2013. ‘Epitaphioi mythoi and tragedy as encomium of Athens’, TC 5: 289–317.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. 2014. Lycurgan Athens and the Making of Classical Tragedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanink, J. 2015. ‘Why 386? Lost empire, old tragedy and reperformance in the era of the Corinthian War’, TC 7: 277–96.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. 2003. ‘Rhetoric, history and ideology: the civic panegyrics of Leonardo Bruni’, in Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections, ed. Hankins, J.. Cambridge: 143–78.Google Scholar
Hannah, P. 2010. ‘The warrior loutrophoroi of fifth-century Athens’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 266–303.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1975. Eisangelia: The Sovereignty of the People’s Court in Athens in the Fourth Century BC and the Impeachment of Generals and Politicians. Odense.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles and Ideology, tr. J. A. Crook. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and Oxford.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1993. La démocratie athénienne à l’époque de Démosthène, tr. S. Bardet. Paris.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. 1989. The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. 1996. ‘Hoplites into democrats: the changing ideology of Athenian infantry’, in Dēmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, eds. Ober, J. and Hedrick, C.. Princeton: 289–312.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. 1998. Warfare and Agriculture in Classical Greece, rev. ed. Berkeley, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. 2000. ‘Hoplite battle as ancient Greek warfare: when, where, and why?’, in War and Violence in Ancient Greece, ed. van Wees, H.. London and Swansea: 201–32.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. 2005. A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War. New York.Google Scholar
Harding, A. J. 2012. ‘Shelley, mythology and the classical tradition’, in The Oxford Handbook of Percy Bysse Shelley, eds. O’Neill, M., Howe, A. and Callaghan, M.. Oxford: 427–43.Google Scholar
Harding, P. 1973. ‘The purpose of Isokrates’ Archidamos and On the Peace’, ClAnt 6: 137–49.Google Scholar
Harding, P. 2008. The Story of Athens: The Fragments of the Local Chronicles of Attika: Edited and Translated and with an Introduction and Commentary. New York.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. B. 1966. ‘The composition of the Amazonomachy on the shield of Athena Parthenos’, AJA 35: 107–33.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. B. 1981. ‘Motifs of the city-siege on the shield of Athena Parthenos’, AJA 85: 281–317.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. B. 1997. ‘The glories of the Athenians: observations on the program of the frieze of the temple of Athena Nike’, Studies in the History of Art 49: 108–25.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 1982. ‘La mort de l’Autre: les funérailles des rois scythes’, in La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes, eds. Gnoli, G. and Vernant, J.-P.. Cambridge and Paris: 143–54.Google Scholar
Haskins, E. V. 2001. ‘Rhetoric between orality and literacy: cultural memory and performance in Isocrates and Aristotle’, QJS 87: 158–78.Google Scholar
Haskins, E. V. 2005. ‘Philosophy, rhetoric and cultural memory: rereading Plato’s Menexenus and Isocrates’ Panegyricus’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35: 25–45.Google Scholar
Heath, M. 1997. ‘Aristophanes and the discourse of politics’, in The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Theatre, ed. Dobrov, G. W.. Chapel Hill: 230–49.Google Scholar
Heilmann, J. D. 1778. ‘Kritische Gedanken von dem Charakter und der Schreibart des Thucydides’, in Opuscula XIV, ed. Panonius, E. J.. Jena: 89–208.Google Scholar
Heit, H. (ed.) 2005. Die Werte Europas: Verfassungspatriotismus und Wertegemeinschaft in der EU? Münster.Google Scholar
Helmer, É. 2018. ‘Does the political regime feed and rear the citizens? Trophē in Plato’s Menexenus and his other political dialogues’, in Speeches for the Dead: Essays on Plato’s ‘Menexenus’, eds. Parker, H. and Robitzsch, J. M.. Berlin: 135–51.Google Scholar
Helmer, É. 2019. Platon Ménexène: Introduction, nouvelle traduction et commentaire. Paris.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1990. ‘The dēmos and the comic competition’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context, eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton: 271–313.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1991. The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy, 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1998. ‘Attic old comedy, frank speech and democracy’, in Democracy, Empire and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens, eds. Boedeker, D. and Raaflaub, K. A.. Cambridge (Massachusetts): 255–73.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2017. ‘Thucydides and Attic comedy’, in The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, eds. Forsdyke, S., Foster, E. and Balot, R.. Oxford: 605–20.Google Scholar
Herrman, J. 2004. Athenian Funeral Orations: Translation, Introduction and Notes. Newburyport.Google Scholar
Herrman, J. 2008. ‘The authenticity of the Demosthenic funeral oration’, Acta Antiqua Hungarica 48: 171–8.Google Scholar
Herrman, J. 2009a. ‘Hyperides’ Against Diondas and the rhetoric of revolt’, BICS 52: 175–85.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. 1999b. ‘The rhetoric of anti-rhetoric in Athenian oratory’, in Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy, eds. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 201–30.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. 2009. ‘Types of oratory’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, E.. Cambridge: 145–61.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. 2013. ‘Leadership and individuality in the Athenian funeral orations’, BICS 56: 49–65.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. 1984. ‘Introduction: inventing traditions’, in The Invention of Tradition, eds. Hobsbawn, E. and Ranger, T.. Cambridge: 1–14.Google Scholar
Holland, J. and Everett, J. 1855. Memoirs of the Life and Writings of James Montgomery: Volume III. London.Google Scholar
Holmes, D. H. 1896. ‘A study of the type of the Greek epitaphios with special reference to the oration in Thucydides’, The Kansas University Quarterly 4: 219–35.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1998. ‘Images and political identity: the case of Athens’, in Democracy, Empire and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens, eds. Boedecker, D. and Raaflaub, K. A.. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London: 153–83.Google Scholar
Horváth, L. 2014. Der Neue Hypereides: Textedition, Studien und Erläuterungen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hourcade, A. 2017. ‘La revendication du statut de conseiller par les sophistes: aspects politiques et éthiques’, in Conseillers et ambassadeurs dans l’antiquité, eds. Queyrel Bottineau, A. and Guelfucci, M.-R.. Besançon: 245–62.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1991. The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. 1980. ‘Family tombs and tomb cult in ancient Athens: tradition or traditionalism?’, JHS 100: 96–126.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. 1993. The Family, Women and Death: Comparative Studies, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hunt, P. 2010a. ‘Athenian militarism and the recourse to war’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 225–43.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2002. ‘The sense of an author: Theocritus and [Theocritus]’, in The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, eds. Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S.. Leiden: 89–108.Google Scholar
Iglesias-Zoido, J. C. 2015. ‘The speeches of Thucydides and the Renaissance anthologies’, in A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides, eds. Lee, C. and Morley., N. Malden: 43–60.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. R. 1960. ‘Ergon: history as a monument in Herodotus and Thucydides’, AJP 81: 261–90.Google Scholar
Iori, L. 2019. ‘Thucydides and English Renaissance education’, in The Afterlife of Herodotus and Thucydides, eds. North, J. and Mack, P.. London: 61–76.Google Scholar
Ismard, P. 2014. ‘Classes, ordres, statuts: la réception française de la sociologie finleyenne et le cas Pierre Vidal-Naquet’, Anabases 19: 39–53.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. 1944. ‘Patrios nomos: state burial in Athens and the public cemetery in the Kerameikos’, JHS 64: 37–66.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. 2013. ‘D’une condition sociale à un statut politique, les ambiguïtés du thète’, Ktèma 38: 7–13.Google Scholar
Jameson, M. H. 2005. ‘The family of Herakles in Attika’, in Herakles and Hercules: Exploring a Graeco-Roman Divinity, eds. Rawlings, L. and Bowden, H.. Swansea: 15–36.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. 1876b. The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeus: Some Remarks on an Article by the Rev. Prof. J. P. Mahaffy in The Academy of April 1, 1876. London.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. 1877. The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeus: A Rejoinder to Prof. Mahaffy’s Reply. London.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I. 1999. Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jost, K. 1936. Das Beispiel und Vorbild der Vorfahren bei den attischen Rednern und Geschichtsschreibern bis Demosthenes. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Jung, M. 2006. Marathon und Plataiai: Zwei Perserschlachten als ‘lieux de mémoire’ im antiken Griechenland. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2018. ‘Plato’s funeral oration: the motive of the Menexenus’, in Speeches for the Dead: Essays on Plato’s ‘Menexenus’, eds. Parker, H. and Robitzsch, J. M.. Berlin: 9–28.Google Scholar
Kakridis, J. T. 1961. Der Thukydideische Epitaphios: Ein stilistischer Kommentar. Munich.Google Scholar
Kapach, A. 2020, ‘The art of mythical history and the temporality of the Athenian epitaphioi logoi’, TC 12: 312–40.Google Scholar
Kasimis, D. 2018. The Perpetual Immigrant and the Limits of Athenian Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keane, J. C. 2010. ‘Epilogue: does democracy have a violent heart?’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 378–408.Google Scholar
Keesling, C. M. 2012. ‘The Marathon casualty list from Eua-Loukou and the plinthedon style in Attic inscriptions’, ZPE 180: 139–48.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1985. ‘Oratory’, in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Volume I: Greek Literature, eds. Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W.. Cambridge: 489–526.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. 2018. ‘A classic dethroned: the decline and fall of Thucydides in Middle Byzantium’, GRBS 58: 607–35.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. 1966. Erlebnis und Darstellung der Perserkriege: Studien zu Simonides, Pindar, Aischylos und den attischen Rednern. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kierstead, J. 2014. ‘Grote’s Athens: the character of democracy’, in Brill’s Companion to George Grote and the Classical Tradition: Volume I, ed. Demetriou, K. N.. Leiden: 161–210.Google Scholar
Kirk, I. 1987. ‘Images of Amazons: marriage and matriarchy’, in Images of Women in Peace and War, eds. Macdonald, S., Holden, P. and Ardener, S.. Basingstoke: 27–39.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2010. ‘Ridiculing a popular war: old comedy and militarism in classical Athens’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 184–200.Google Scholar
Konstantinou, A. 2015. ‘Tradition and innovation in tragedy’s mythological exempla’, CQ 65: 476–88.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. 2013. ‘Introduction: the world of dithyramb’, in Dithyramb in Context, eds. Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P.. Cambridge: 1–27.Google Scholar
Krentz, P. 2002. ‘Fighting by the rules: the invention of the hoplite agōn’, Hesperia 71: 23–39.Google Scholar
Kron, U. 1976. Die zehn attischen Phylenheroen: Geschichte, Mythos, Kult und Darstellung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kucewicz, C. 2021. The Treatment of the War Dead in Archaic Athens: An Ancestral Custom. London.Google Scholar
Laing, D. R. 1965. ‘A new interpretation of the Athenian naval catalogue, IG ii2 1954’, PhD thesis, The University of Cincinnati (Cincinnati).Google Scholar
Laistner, M. L. W. 1927. Isocrates De Pace and Philippus Edited with a Historical Introduction and Commentary. New York.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 2003. Metaphors We Live By, 2nd ed., with a new afterword. Chicago.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (eds.) 2016. Early Greek Philosophy: Volume VIII: Sophists, Part 1 and Volume IX: Sophists, Part 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Landmann, G. 1974. ‘Das Lob Athens in der Grabrede des Perikles: Thukydides II 34–41’, MH 31: 65–95.Google Scholar
Lanza, D. and Vegetti, M. 1977a. ‘L’ideologia della città’, in L’ideologia della città, eds. Lanza, D., Vegetti, M., Calani, G. and Sircana, F.. Naples: 13–27.Google Scholar
Lape, S. 2003. Reproducing Athens: Menander’s Comedy, Democratic Culture and the Hellenistic City. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lape, S. 2010. Race and Citizen Identity in the Classical Athenian Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lattimore, R. 1943. ‘Aeschylus on the defeat of Xerxes’, in Classical Studies in Honour of William Abbott Oldfather. Urbana: 82–93.Google Scholar
Lazenby, J. 1991. ‘The killing zone’, in Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, ed. Hanson, V. D.. London and New York: 87–109.Google Scholar
Lech, M. L. 2009. ‘The knights’ eleven oars: in praise of Phormio? Aristophanes’ Knights 546–7’, CJ 105: 19–26.Google Scholar
Lech, M. L. 2019. ‘Praise, past and ponytails: the funeral oration and democratic ideology in the parabasis of Aristophanes’ Knights’, in Poet and Orator: A Symbiotic Relationship in Democratic Athens, eds. Markantonatos, A. and Volonaki, E.. Berlin: 102–22.Google Scholar
Lee, C. and Morley, N. (eds.) 2015. A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides. Malden.Google Scholar
Lee, K. 1999. ‘The Dionysia: instrument of control or platform for critique?’, in Gab es das Griechische Wunder?: Griechenland zwischen dem Ende des 6. und der Mitte des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.: Tagungsbeiträge des 16. Fachsymposiums der Alexander-von-Humboldt-Stiftung, veranstaltet vom 5. bis 9. April 1999 in Freiburg im Breisgau, eds. Papenfuss, D. and Strocker, V. M.. Mainz: 77–86.Google Scholar
Lefort, C. 1987. ‘L’œuvre de Clastres’, in L’Esprit des lois sauvages: Pierre Clastres ou une nouvelle anthropologie politique, ed. Abensour, M.. Paris: 183–209.Google Scholar
Legrand, S. 2009. ‘Louis Althusser: Mai 1968 et les fluctuations de l’idéologie’, Actuel Marx 45: 128–36.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. 2000. ‘Homeric vengeance and the outbreak of Greek wars’, in War and Violence in Ancient Greece, ed. van Wees, H.. London: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. 2013. ‘Intégrés ou dénoncés: la place faite aux pauvres dans les discours grecs sur la démocratie’, Ktèma 38: 37–51.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. 2017. Pseudo-Xénophon: Constitution des Athéniens: texte édité, traduit et commenté. Paris.Google Scholar
Lenfant, D. 2018. ‘Quel modèle pour l’oligarque? Le passé, l’ailleurs et l’utopie dans la Constitution des Athéniens du Pseudo-Xénophon’, in Athenaion Politeiai tra storia, politica e sociologia: Aristotele e Pseudo-Senofonte, eds. Bearzot, C., Canevaro, M., Gargiulo, T. and Poddighe, E.. Milan: 309–22.Google Scholar
Lévy, E. 1976. Athènes devant la défaite de 404: histoire d’une crise idéologique. Paris.Google Scholar
Lévy, E. Levy, E. 2006. ‘United 93: film’s politics’, http://emanuellevy.com/comment/the-politics-of-iunited-93i–2/.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. 1992. ‘The Archidamian War II: the war’, in Cambridge Ancient History: Volume V, eds. Lewis, D. M., Boardman, J., Davies, J. K. and Ostwald, M.. Cambridge: 370–422.Google Scholar
Lianeri, A. 2002. ‘Translation and the establishment of liberal democracy in nineteenth-century England: constructing the political as an interpretive act’, in Translation and Power, eds. Tymoczko, M. and Gerntzler, E.. Amherst: 1–24.Google Scholar
Liddel, P. 2008. ‘Democracy ancient and modern’, in A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Balot, R. K.. Oxford: 133–48.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1982. Violence, Civil Strife and Revolution in the Classical City, 750–330 BC. London.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1989. ‘The world of the warrior’, in A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece, eds. Bérard, C. et al., tr. D. Lyons. Princeton: 39–52.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1990. L’autre guerrier: archers, peltastes, cavaliers dans l’imagerie attique. Paris and Rome.Google Scholar
Livingstone, N. 1998. ‘The voice of Isocrates and the dissemination of cultural power’, in Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning, eds. Too, Y. L. and Livingstone, N.. Cambridge: 263–81.Google Scholar
Loening, T. C. 1981. ‘The autobiographical speeches of Lysias and the biographical tradition’, Hermes 109: 280–94.Google Scholar
Lombard, D. 1982. ‘La mort en Insulinde’, in La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes, eds. Gnoli, G. and Vernant, J.-P.. Cambridge and Paris: 483–97.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1975. ‘Hēbē et andreia: deux versions de la mort du combattant athénien’, AncSoc 6: 1–31.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1981. L’invention d’Athènes: histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘cité classique’, 1st ed. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loraux, N. 1982. ‘Mourir devant Troie, tomber pour Athènes: de la gloire du héros à l’idée de la cité’, in La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes, eds. Gnoli, G. and Vernant, J.-P.. Cambridge and Paris: 27–43.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1984a. Les enfants d’Athèna: idées athéniennes sur la citoyenneté et la division des sexes. Paris.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1984b. ‘Solon au milieu de la lice’, in Aux origines de l’hellénisme, la Crète et la Grèce: hommage à Henri van Effenterre. Paris: 199–214.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1986b. The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, tr. A. Sheridan. Cambridge (Massachusetts).Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1987b. ‘Notes sur l’un, le deux et le multiple’, in L’esprit des lois sauvages: Pierre Clastres ou une nouvelle anthropologie politique, ed. Abensour, M.. Paris: 155–71.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1989. ‘Les mots qui voient’, in L’interprétation des textes, ed. Reichler, C.. Paris: 157–82.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1991. ‘Socrate contrepoison de l’oraison funèbre: enjeu et signification du Menexène’, AC 43: 172–211.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1993a. L’invention d’Athènes: histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘cité classique’, 2nd abridged ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1993b. The Children of Athena: Athenian Ideas about Citizenship and the Division Between the Sexes, tr. C. Levine. Princeton.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1995. The Experiences of Tiresias: The Feminine and the Greek Man, tr. P. Wissing. Princeton.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 2002. The Divided City: On Memory and Forgetting in Ancient Athens, tr. C. Pache and J. Fort. New York.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 2005. La tragédie d’Athènes: la politique entre l’ombre et l’utopie. Paris.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 2006. The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, reprint with the preface of the French abridged ed., tr. A. Sheridan. New York.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 2018. ‘The “beautiful death” from Homer to democratic Athens’, tr. D. M. Pritchard, Arethusa 51: 73–89.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 2022. L’invention d’Athènes: histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘cité classique’, new ed., with a foreword by V. Azoulay and P. Ismard. Paris.Google Scholar
Low, P. 2003, ‘Remembering war in fifth-century Greece: ideologies, societies and commemoration beyond Athens’, PCPhS 48: 102–22.Google Scholar
Low, P. 2007. Interstate Relations in Classical Greece: Morality and Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Low, P. 2010. ‘Commemoration of the war dead in classical Athens: remembering defeat and victory’, in War, Culture and Democracy in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 341–58.Google Scholar
Low, P. 2012. ‘The monuments of the war dead in classical Athens: form, contexts, meanings’, in Cultures of Commemoration: War Memorials, Ancient and Modern, eds. Low, P., Oliver, G. and Rhodes, P. J.. Oxford: 13–39.Google Scholar
Low, P., Oliver, G. and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.) 2012. Cultures of Commemoration: War Memorials, Ancient and Modern. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luginbill, R. D. 2014. ‘The Battle of Oinoe, the painting in the Stoa Poikile and Thucydides’ silence’, Historia 63: 278–92.Google Scholar
Maas, P. 1928. ‘Zitate aus Demosthenes’ Epitaphios bei Lykurgos: Nachtrag zu dem Aufsatz von Joh. Sykutris’, Hermes 63: 258–60.Google Scholar
McCauley, C. 1998. ‘When screen violence is not attractive’, in Why We Watch: The Attractions of Violent Entertainment, ed. Goldstein, J.. Oxford: 144–62.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1995. Aristophanes and Athens: An Introduction to the Plays. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mader, G. 2007. ‘Dramatizing didaxis: aspects of Demosthenes’ “Periclean” project’, CPh 102: 155–79.Google Scholar
Mahaffy, J. P. 1876a. ‘Review: The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeus by R. C. Jebb’, The Academy: A Weekly Review of Literature, Science, and Art 9: 314–16.Google Scholar
Mahaffy, J. P. 1876b. The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeus: Reply to the Remarks of R. C. Jebb Esq. M.A. on a Review in The Academy. London.Google Scholar
Mann, R. 2019. ‘Seafaring practice and narratives in Homer’s Odyssey’, Antichthon 53: 1–13.Google Scholar
Marchiandi, D. and Mari, M. 2016. ‘I funerali per i caduti in Guerra: la difficile armonia di pubblico e privato nell’Atene del V secolo a.C.’, MediterrAnt 19: 177–201.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. M. 2007. ‘Speeches in classical historiography’, in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J. M., 2 volumes. Oxford: 118–32.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1982. L’idéologie allemande, tr. R. Cartelle and G. Badia. Paris.Google Scholar
Matheson, S. B. 2005. ‘A farewell with arms: departing warriors on Athenian vases’, in Periklean Athens and Its Legacy: Problems and Perspectives, eds. Barringer, J. M. and Hurwit, J. M.. Austin: 23–35.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1966. ‘Athenian imperialism and the foundation of Brea’, CQ 16: 191–2.Google Scholar
Megill, A. and D. N. McCloskey, 1987. ‘The rhetoric of history’, in The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs, eds. Newlson, J. S., Megill, A. and McCloskey, D. N.. Madison.Google Scholar
Meiggs, R. and Lewis, D. M. 1969. A Selection of Greek Historical Documents to the End of the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meineck, P. 2012. ‘Combat trauma and the tragic stage: “restoration” by cultural catharsis’, Intertexts 16: 7–24.Google Scholar
Memorabilia 1915. The Ideal of Citizenship: Being the Speech of Pericles over Those Fallen in the War, tr. A. E. Zimmern. London.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. 1899. Forschungen zur Alten Geschichte; Band II: Zur Geschichte des fünften Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Halle.Google Scholar
Michaelis, A. Michelini, A. N. 1998. ‘Isocrates’ civic invective: Acharnians and On the Peace’, TAPhA 128: 115–33.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1978. ‘Grote’s History of Greece II’, in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Volume XI: Essays on Philosophy and the Classics, ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto and London: 307–38.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2010. ‘Affirming Athenian action: Euripides’ portrayal of military activity and the limits of tragic instruction’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 163–83.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2020. Drama, Oratory and Thucydides in Fifth-Century Athens: Teaching Imperial Lessons. Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar
Milns, R. D. 1995. ‘Historical paradigms in Demosthenes’ public speeches’, Electronic Antiquity 2.Google Scholar
Missiou, A. 1992. The Subversive Oratory of Andokides: Politics, Ideology and Decision-Making in Democratic Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. S. 1998. ‘Remembering Pericles: the political and theoretical import of Plato’s Menexenus’, Political Theory 26: 489–513.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 2010. The Forgan Smith: History of a Building and Its People at the University of Queensland. Brisbane.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. A. 2003. ‘The tyranny of the audience in Plato and Isocrates’, in Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and its Discontents in Ancient Greece, ed. Morgan, K. A.. Austin: 181–213.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. A. 2004. ‘The education of Athens: politics and rhetoric in Isocrates and Plato’, in Isocrates and Civic Education, eds. Poulakos, T. and Depew, D.. Austin: 125–54.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2017. ‘The many and the few’, Sphinx, https://thesphinxblog.com/2017/05/10/the-many-and-the-few.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2018a. ‘Legitimising war and defending peace: Thucydides in WWI and after’, Classical Receptions Journal 10: 415–34.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2018b. ‘Thucydides: origins of realism’, in The Edinburgh Companion to Political Realism, eds. Hollingsworth, M. and Schuett, R.. Edinburgh: 111–23.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. S., Coates, J. F. and Rankov, N. B. 2000. The Athenian Trireme: The History and Reconstruction of an Ancient Greek Warship, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mossé, C. 1962. La fin de la démocratie athénienne: aspects sociaux et politiques du déclin de la cité grecque au IVe siècle avant J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Moysey, R. A. 1982. ‘Isocrates On the Peace: rhetorical exercise or political advice?’, AJAH 1: 118–27.Google Scholar
Muhlack, U. 2011. ‘Herodotus and Thucydides in the view of nineteenth-century German historians’, in The Western Time of Ancient History: Historiographical Encounters with the Greek and Roman Pasts, ed. Lianeri, A.. Cambridge: 179–209.Google Scholar
Müller, C. F. W. (ed.) 1858. Oratores Attici: Band 2: Lycurgus, Aeschines, Hyperides, Dinarchus, Gorgiae Lesbonactis, Herodis, Alcidamantis declamationes. Paris.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. 1991. ‘Platon und der “Panegyrikos” des Isokrates: Überlegungen zum platonischen Menexenos’, Philologus 135: 140–56.Google Scholar
Murari Pires, F. 2006. ‘Thucydidean modernities’, in Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, eds. Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis., A. Leiden: 811–37.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2019. ‘La réception de Vernant dans le monde anglophone’, in Relire Vernant, eds. Georgoudi, S. and de Polignac, F.. Paris: 291–316.Google Scholar
Neer, R. T. 2002. Style and Politics in Athenian Vase-Painting: The Craft of Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicolaï, R. 2004. Studi su Isocrate: la communicazione letteraria nel IV sec. A. C. e i nuovi generi della prosa. Rome.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. H. 2018. Two Studies in the History of Ancient Greek Athletics. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. H. and Schwartz, A. 2013. ‘Coalition warfare in the ancient Greek world’, in Coalition Warfare: An Anthology of Scholarly Presentations at the Conference on Coalition Warfare at the Royal Danish College, 2011, eds. Poulsen, N. B., Galster, K. H. and Nørby, S.. Newcastle upon Tyne: 29–50.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1988 [1889]. Götzen-Dämmerung, oder Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophirt, in Sämtliche Werke: Kritischen Studienausgabe VI, eds. Colli, G. and Montinari, M.. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. 1997. ‘Bürgerkrieg und Amnestie: Athen 411–403’, in Amnestie, oder: Die Politik der Erinnerung in der Demokratie, eds. Smith, G. and Margalit, A.. Frankfurt: 103–19.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. 2005. ‘Antike Tradition und europäische politische Kultur’, in Die Werte Europas: Verfassungspatriotismus und Wertegemeinschaft in der EU?, ed. Heit, H.. Münster: 23–36.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. 2015. Ancient and Modern Democracy: Two Concepts of Liberty?, tr. K. Tribe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Noel, A.-S. 2019. ‘Hybris and hybridity in Aeschylus’ Persians: a posthumanist perspective on Xerxes’ expedition’, in Classical Literature and Posthumanism, eds. Chesi, G. M. and Spiegel, F.. London: 259–65.Google Scholar
Noël, M. P. 2017. ‘Discours panhellénique et discours de conseil: des Olympiques de Gorgias et Lysias au Panégyrique d’Isocrate’, in Conseillers et ambassadeurs dans l’antiquité, eds. Queyrel Bottineau, A. and Guelfucci, M.-R.. Besançon: 291–9.Google Scholar
O’Connell, P. A. 2017. ‘Enargeia, persuasion, and the vividness effect in Athenian forensic oratory’, Advances in the History of Rhetoric 20: 225–51.Google Scholar
Oakley, J. H. 2004. Picturing Death in Classical Athens: The Evidence of the White Lekythoi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology and the Power of the People. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1996. The Athenian Revolution: Essays on Ancient Greek Democracy and Political Theory. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1998. Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 2010. ‘Thucydides on Athens’ democratic advantage in the Archidamian War’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 65–87.Google Scholar
Ober, J. and Strauss, B. S. 1990. ‘Drama, political rhetoric and the discourse of Athenian democracy’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Civic Context, eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton: 237–70.Google Scholar
Ochs, D. J. 1993. Consolatory Rhetoric: Grief, Symbol and Ritual in the Greco-Roman Era. Columbia.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. J. 2000. ‘Athenian funerary monuments: style, grandeur and cost’, in The Epigraphy of Death: Studies in the History and Society of Greece and Rome, ed. Oliver, G. J.. Liverpool: 480–513.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. J. 2012. ‘Naming the dead, writing the individual: classical tradition and commemorative practices in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, in Cultures of Commemoration: War Memorials, Ancient and Modern, eds. Low, P., Oliver, G. and Rhodes, P. J.. London: 113–34.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. 2017. Eupolis: Einleitung, Testimonia und Aiges-Demoi (Frr. 1–146). Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Orfanos, C. 2014. ‘Le Ploutos d’Aristophane: un éloge de la pauvreté?’, in La pauvreté en Grèce ancienne: formes, représentations, enjeux, eds. Galbois, E. and Rougier-Blanc, S.. Bordeaux: 213–22.Google Scholar
Osborne, M. J. and Byrne, S. G. 1994. A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names: Volume II: Attica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2010. ‘Democratic ideology, the events of war and the iconography of Attic funerary sculpture’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 245–65.Google Scholar
Osmers, M. 2013. “Wir aber sind damals und jetzt immer die Gleichen”: Vergangenheitsbezüge in der polisübergreifenden Kommunikation der klassischen Zeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. 1986. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens. Berkeley, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pade, M. 2015. ‘The Renaissance’, in A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides, eds. Lee, C. and Morley, N.. Malden: 26–42.Google Scholar
Paillard, E. 2017. The Stage and the City: Non-Elite Characters in the Tragedies of Sophocles. Paris.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1987. ‘Myths of early Athens’, in Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. Bremmer, J.. London: 187–214.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1996b. Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Patel, K. 2017. ‘Der Streit um Werte und Normen: Die Präambel des Entwurfs des Verfassungsvertrags von 2003’, Themenportal Europäische Geschichte, www.europa.clio-online.de/essay/id/artikel-4323.Google Scholar
Payen, P. 2012. Les revers de la guerre en Grèce ancienne: histoire et historiographie. Paris.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997. ‘Conclusion’, in Greek Tragedy and the Historian, ed. Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford: 213–36.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2015a. Epideictic Oratory: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise. Austin.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2015b. ‘Les orateurs antiques entre guerre et paix’, in Colloque: la Grèce et la guerre, eds. Contamine, P., Jouanna, J. and Zink., M. Paris: 13–28.Google Scholar
Picard, C. and Reinach, A. J. 1912. ‘Voyage dans la Chersonèse et aux îles de la mer de Thrace’, BCH 36: 275–352.Google Scholar
Piovan, D. 2008. ‘Criticism ancient and modern: observations on the critical tradition of Athenian democracy’, Polis 25: 305–29.Google Scholar
Poltera, O. 2008. Simonides lyricus: Testimonia und Fragmente: Einleitung, kritische Ausgabe, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Basel.Google Scholar
Porciani, L. 1999. ‘Come si scrivono i discorsi: Su Tucidide I 22,1 an…malist’ eipein’, QS 49: 103–35.Google Scholar
Pownall, F. 2004. Lessons from the Past: The Moral Use of History in Fourth-Century Prose. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pownall, F. 2013. ‘Hekataios of Miletus’, in Brill’s New Jacoby, https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly-supplements-i-2/hecataeus-of-miletus-COM_0099.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. D. 2006. ‘Isocrates in Athens: public philosophy and the rhetoric of display’, PhD thesis, University of California (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Prinz, K. 1997. Epitaphios logos: Struktur, Funktion und Bedeutung der Bestattungsreden im Athen des 5. und 4. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 1994. ‘From hoplite republic to thetic democracy: the social context of the reforms of Ephialtes’, AH 24: 111–39.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 1996. ‘Thucydides and the tradition of the Athenian funeral oration’, AH 26: 137–50.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 1998. ‘“The fractured imaginary”: popular thinking on military matters in fifth-century Athens’, AH 28: 38–61.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 1999a. ‘Fool’s gold and silver: reflections on the evidentiary status of finely painted Attic pottery’, Antichthon 33: 1–27.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 1999b. ‘The fractured imaginary: popular thinking on citizen soldiers and warfare in fifth-century Athens’, PhD thesis, Macquarie University (Sydney).Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2004. ‘Kleisthenes, participation and the dithyrambic contests of late archaic and classical Athens’, Phoenix 58: 208–28.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2005. ‘Kleisthenes and Athenian democracy: vision from above or below?’, Polis 22: 136–57.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2010. ‘The symbiosis between democracy and war: the case of ancient Athens’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 1–62.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2012. ‘Aristophanes and de Ste. Croix: the value of old comedy as evidence for Athenian popular culture’, Antichthon 46: 14–51.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2014. ‘The position of Attic women in democratic Athens’, G&R 61: 174–93.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2016. ‘Sport and democracy in classical Athens’, Antichthon 50: 50–69.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2018b. ‘The horsemen of classical Athens: some considerations on their recruitment and social background’, Athenaeum 106: 405–19.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2018c. ‘The standing of sailors in democratic Athens’, DHA 44: 231–53.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2019b. ‘The physical parameters of Athenian democracy’, Antichthon 53: 33–55.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. M. 2020. ‘When French historians of ancient Greece conquered the world’, Kathimerini, English ed. 20 February, 2.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K. 1985. The Greek State at War: Volume IV. London, Los Angeles and Berkeley.Google Scholar
Proietti, G. 2014. ‘Annual games for the war dead and founders in classical times: between hero-cult and civic honours’, Nikephoros 27: 199–213.Google Scholar
Proietti, G. 2015. ‘Beyond the “invention of Athens”: the 5th century Athenian “Tatenkatalog” as example of “intentional history”’, Klio 97: 516–38.Google Scholar
Proietti, G. 2017. ‘Fare i conti con la guerra: forme del discorso civico ad Atene nel V secolo (con uno sguardo all’età contemporanea)’, in Conflict in Communities: Forward-Looking Memories in Classical Athens, eds. Franchi, E. and Proietti, G.. Trento: 69–108.Google Scholar
Pry, C. 2015. ‘The artist as critic? Some notes on the portrayal of Athenian warmaking in the plays of Euripides’, C&M 66: 75–102.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1980. ‘Des freien Bürgers Recht der freien Rede: Ein Beitrag zur Sozial- und Begriffsgeschichte der athenischen Demokratie’, in Studien zur antiken Sozialgeschichte: Festschrift F. Vittinghoff, eds. Eck, W. et al. Cologne and Vienna: 7–57.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1989. ‘Contemporary perceptions of democracy in fifth-century Athens’, C&M 40: 33–70.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1994. ‘Democracy, power and imperialism in fifth-century Athens’, in Athenian Political Thought and the Reconstruction of American Democracy, eds. Euben, J. P., Wallach, J. R. and Ober, J.. Ithaca: 103–46.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1996. ‘Equalities and inequalities in Athenian democracy’, in Dēmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, eds. Ober, J. and Hedrick, C.. Princeton: 139–74.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2001. ‘Father of all, destroyer of all: war in late fifth-century Athenian discourse and ideology’, in War and Democracy: A Comparative Study of the Korean War and the Peloponnesian War, eds. McCann, D. R. and Strauss, B. S.. Armonk and London: 307–56.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2006. ‘Thucydides on democracy and oligarchy’, in Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, eds. Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A.. Leiden: 189–222.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2007a. ‘Searching for peace in the ancient world’, in War and Peace in the Ancient World, ed. Raaflaub, K. A.. Malden: 1–33.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2007b. ‘The breakthrough of dēmokratia in mid-fifth-century Athens’, in The Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece, eds. Raaflaub, K. A., Ober, J. and Wallace, R. W., with chapters by P. Cartledge and C. Farrar. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 105–54.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2014. ‘War and the city: the brutality of war and its impact on the community’, in Combat Trauma and the Ancient Greeks, eds. Meineck, P. and Konstan., D. New York: 15–46.Google Scholar
Rabe, H. (ed.) 1931. Prolegomenon sylloge: accedit Maximi libellus de obiectionibus insolubilibus. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. 1973. ‘Sur la théorie de l’idéologie politique d’Althusser’, L’homme et la société 27: 31–61.Google Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K. 2015. ‘Neither fish nor fowl: burial practices between inhumation and cremation’, in Death Embodied: Archaeological Approaches to the Treatment of the Corpse, eds. Devlin, Z. L. and Graham, E.-J.. Oxford: 18–40.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. M. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago.Google Scholar
Rees, O. 2018. ‘Picking over the bones: the practicalities of processing the Athenian war dead’, Journal of Ancient History 6: 167–84.Google Scholar
Reill, P. H. 1975. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 2003b. ‘Nothing to do with democracy: Athenian drama and the polis’, JHS 123: 104–19.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. 2014. ‘Theseus the democrat’, Miscellanea Antropologica et Sociologica 15: 98–118.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. and Osborne, R. (eds.) 2003. Greek Historical Inscriptions 404–323 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T. 2012. ‘Mourning and democracy: the Periclean epitaphios and its afterlife’, in Thucydides and the Modern World: Reception, Reinterpretation and Influence from the Renaissance to the Present, eds. Harloe, K. and Morley, N.. Cambridge: 140–56.Google Scholar
Robinson, C. 2018. ‘“Since we two are alone”: Socratic Paideia in the Menexenus’, in Speeches for the Dead: Essays on Plato’s ‘Menexenus’, eds. Parker, H. and Robitzsch, J. M.. Berlin: 173–96.Google Scholar
Robitzsch, J. M. 2018. ‘Ethnic identity and its political consequences in the Menexenus’, in Speeches for the Dead: Essays on Plato’s ‘Menexenus’, eds. Parker, H. and Robitzsch, J. M.. Berlin: 153–71.Google Scholar
Robson, J. 2016. ‘Humouring the masses: the theatre audience and the highs and lows of Aristophanic comedy’, in Popular Culture in the Ancient World, ed. Grig, L.. Cambridge: 66–87.Google Scholar
Roisman, J. 2002. ‘The rhetoric of courage in the Athenian orators’, in Andreia: Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity, eds. Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I.. Boston: 126–43.Google Scholar
Roisman, J. 2005. The Rhetoric of Manhood: Masculinity in the Attic Orators. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Roisman, J. 2006. The Rhetoric of Conspiracy in Ancient Athens. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Roselli, D. K. 2007. ‘Gender, class and ideology: the social function of virgin sacrifice in Euripides’ Children of Herakles’, ClAnt 26: 81–169.Google Scholar
Roselli, D. K. 2011. Theatre of the People: Spectators and Society in Ancient Athens. Austin.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D. 1993. ‘Shouting “fire” in a crowded theater: Phrynichos’s Capture of Miletus and the politics of fear in early Attic tragedy’, Philologus 137: 159–96.Google Scholar
Roubineau, J.-M. 2015. Les cités grecques (VIe–IIe siècle av. J.-C.): essai d’histoire sociale. Paris.Google Scholar
Roussel, D. 1976. Tribu et cité: études sur les groupes sociaux dans les cités grecques aux époques archaïque et classique. Paris.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. 2014. ‘Utopianism’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy, ed. Revermann, M.. Cambridge: 206–21.Google Scholar
Ruschenbusch, E. 1966. Solōnos Nomoi: Die Fragmente des Solonischen Gesetzeswerkes mit einer Text- und Überlieferungsgeschichte. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. S. 1986. ‘Structure, style and sense in interpreting Thucydides: the soldier’s choice (Thuc. 2.42.4)’, HSPh 90: 49–76.Google Scholar
Salkever, S. G. 1993. ‘Socrates’ Aspasian oration: the play of philosophy and politics in Plato’s Menexenus’, American Political Science Review 87: 133–43.Google Scholar
Samons, L. J. 2016. Pericles and the Conquest of History: A Political Biography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sawyer, E. 2013. ‘Pericles and A. S. Way: or, why you should write for your local paper’, Sphinx, https://thesphinxblog.com/2013/08/23/pericles-and-a-s-way-or-why-you-should-write-for-your-local-paper/.Google Scholar
Sawyer, E. 2015. ‘Thucydides in modern political rhetoric’, in A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides, eds. Lee, C. and Morley, N.. Malden: 529–47.Google Scholar
Schäfer, T. 1997. Andres Agathoi: Studien zum Realitätsgehalt der Bewaffnung attischer Krieger auf Denkmälern klassischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. 2007. ‘Theory and practice in fourth-century eloquence: the case of the speaker as a teacher of the demos’, in Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric, eds. Mirhady, D. C. and Fortenbaugh, W. W.. Leiden: 25–35.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E. 1999. The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Schirren, T. and Zinsmaier, T. 2003. ‘Gorgias’, in Die Sophisten: Ausgewählte Texte, eds. Schirren, T. and Zinsmaier, T.. Stuttgart: 50–113.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. 2005. Rhetorische Bilder auf attischen Vasen: Visuelle Kommunikation im 5. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmitt Pantel, P. and F. de Polignac, 2007. ‘Introduction’, in Athènes et le politique: dans le sillage de Claude Mossé, eds. Schmitt Pantel, P. and de Polignac, F.. Paris: 7–11.Google Scholar
Schnapp-Gourbeillon, A. 1982. ‘Les funérailles de Patrocle’, in La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes, eds. Gnoli, G. and Vernant, J.-P.. Cambridge and Paris: 77–88.Google Scholar
Schneider, H, 1912. Untersuchungen über die Staatsbegräbnisse und den Aufbau der öffentlichen Leichenreden bei den Athenern in der klassischen Zeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Scholten, H. 2003. Die Sophistik: Eine Bedrohung für die Religion und Politik der Polis? Berlin.Google Scholar
Scholtz, A. 2004. ‘Friends, lovers, flatters: demophilic courtship in Aristophanes’ Knights’, TAPhA 134: 263–93.Google Scholar
Schöne-Denkinger, A. (ed.) 2014. Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum: Berlin, Antikensammlung 15. Munich.Google Scholar
Schröder, O. 1914. De laudibis Athenarum a poetis tragicis e ab oratoribus epidicticis excultis. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. 2009. ‘The north frieze of the temple of Athena Nike’, in Art in Athens during the Peloponnesian War, ed. Palagia, O.. Cambridge: 131–47.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. A. 2005. ‘Celebrations of victory: the metopes of the Parthenon’, in The Parthenon: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Neils, J.. Cambridge: 159–97.Google Scholar
Schwarzmaier, A. 2011. ‘Grabmonument und Ritualgefäß: Zur Kriegerlutrophore Schliemann in Berlin und Athen’, in Keraunia: Beiträge zu Mythos, Kult und Heiligtum in der Antike, eds. Pilz, O. and Vonderstein, M.. Berlin and Boston: 115–30.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 1999–2000. ‘Tradition and innovation in Euripidean aitiology’, ICS 24–5: 217–33.Google Scholar
Sealey, R. 1974. ‘The origins of demokratia’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 6: 253–95.Google Scholar
Sears, M. 2013. Athens, Thrace and the Shaping of Athenian Leadership. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1986. ‘Greek tragedy and society: a structuralist perspective’, in Greek Tragedy and Political Theory, ed. Euben, J. P.. Berkeley: 43–75.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. 1992. ‘Theseus in Kimonian Athens: the iconography of empire’, MHR 7: 29–49.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. 1994. Myth into Art: Poet and Painter in Classical Greece. London and New York.Google Scholar
Shear, J. L. 2013. ‘“Their memories will never grow old”: the politics of remembrance in the Athenian funeral oration’, CQ 63: 511–36.Google Scholar
Shear, T. L., 2016. Trophies of Victory: Public Building in Periklean Athens. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sicking, C. M. J. 1995. ‘The general purport of Pericles’ funeral oration and last speech’, Hermes 123: 404–25.Google Scholar
Silk, M. 1980. ‘Aristophanes as a lyric poet’, in Aristophanes: Essays in Interpretation, ed. Henderson, J.. Cambridge: 99–151.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. 2011. ‘A woman, a style of thinking: the craft of Nicole Loraux’, Women Philosophers’ Journal 1: 91–108Google Scholar
Smith, C. F. (ed. and tr.) 1928. Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War: Volume I. Cambridge (Massachusetts).Google Scholar
Smith, W. 1854. A History of Greece from the Earliest Times to the Roman Conquest. London.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 1981. Aristophanes Knights Edited with Translation and Notes. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 1987. Aristophanes Birds Edited with Translation and Notes. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 2005. ‘An alternative democracy and an alternative to democracy in Aristophanic comedy’, in Democrazia e antidemocrazia nel mondo greco: atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Chieti, 9–11 aprile 2003, ed. Bultrighini, U.. Alessandria: 195–207.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 2014a. ‘Combat trauma in Athenian comedy: the dog that didn’t bark’, in Combat Trauma and the Ancient Greeks, eds. Meineck, P. and Konstan, D.. New York: 225–36.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 2014b. ‘The politics of Greek comedy’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy, ed. Revermann, M.. Cambridge: 291–305.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1989. ‘Assumptions and the creation of meaning: reading Sophocles’ Antigone’, JHS 109: 134–48.Google Scholar
Spatharas, D. 2001. ‘Gorgias: an edition of the extant texts and fragments with commentary and introduction’, PhD thesis, University of Glasgow (Glasgow).Google Scholar
Spatharas, D. 2019. Emotions, Persuasion and Public Discourse in Classical Athens. Berlin.Google Scholar
Spence, I. G. 1993. The Cavalry of Classical Greece: A Social and Military History with Particular Reference to Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stampolidis, N. (ed.) 2001. Οι καύσεις στην εποχή του χαλκού και την πρώιμη εποχή του σιδήρου. Athens.Google Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. D. 2005. ‘The painting program in the Stoa Poikile’, in Periklean Athens and Its Legacy: Problems and Perspective, eds. Barringer, J. D. and Hurwit, J. M.. Austin: 73–88.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. 2013a. ‘Contesting the lessons from the past: Aeschines’ use of social memory’, TAPhA 143: 65–103.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. 2013b. Social Memory in Athenian Public Discourse: Uses and Meanings of the Past. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. 2017a. ‘The contested memory of Nicias after the Sicilian expedition’, in Conflict in Communities: Forward-Looking Memories in Classical Athens, eds. Franchi, E. and Proietti, G.. Trient: 109–70.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. 2017b. ‘The multipolarity of Athenian social memory: polis, tribes and demes as interdependent memory communities’, in Between Memory Sites and Memory Networks: New Archaeological and Historical Perspectives, eds. Hofmann, K., Bernbeck, R. and Sommer, U.. Berlin: 97–125.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. 1996. ‘Tragedy pure and simple’, in Tragedy and the Tragic, ed. Silk, M. S.. Oxford: 534–46.Google Scholar
Stocking, C. H. 2020. ‘The “Paris School” and the “structuralist invasion” in North America’, Cahiers “Mondes anciens” 13: 1–15.Google Scholar
Stöhr, C. 2020. Schöner Sterben: Das Gefallenengedenken in den griechischen poleis in klassischer und hellenistischer Zeit. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Storey, J. 2018. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction, 8th ed. Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1966. Die Wesensbestimmung der Geschichte durch die antike Geschichtsschreibung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1968. ‘Thukydides und die politische Selbstdarstellung der Athener’, in Thukydides, ed. Herter, H.. Darmstadt: 498–530.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 2009. ‘Thucydides and the political self-portrait of the Athenian’, in Thucydides: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, ed. and tr. Rusten, J.. Oxford: 191–219.Google Scholar
Strauss, B. S. 1996. ‘The Athenian trireme, school of democracy’, in Dēmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, eds. Ober, J. and Hedrick, C. W.. Princeton: 313–26.Google Scholar
Strauss, B. S. 2000. ‘Perspectives on the death of fifth-century Athenian seamen’, in War and Violence in Ancient Greece, ed. van Wees, H.. London and Swansea: 261–84.Google Scholar
Stroud, R. 1971. ‘Greek inscriptions: Theozodites and the Athenian orphans’, Hesperia 40: 280–301.Google Scholar
Stupperich, R. 1994. ‘The iconography of Athenian state burials in the classical period’, in The Archaeology of Athens and Attica under the Democracy, eds. Coulson, W. D. E. et al. Oxford: 93–103.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. G. and Webb, E. K. 1994. ‘From orality to rhetoric: an intellectual transformation’, in Greek Persuasion in Action, ed. Worthington, I.. London: 3–25.Google Scholar
Timmerman, D. M. 1998. ‘Isocrates’ competing conceptualization of philosophy’, Ph&Rh 31: 145–60.Google Scholar
Timmerman, D. M. and Schiappa, E. 2010. Classical Rhetorical Theory and the Disciplining of Discourse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Timmons, H. 2006. ‘Four years on, a cabin’s-eye view of 9/11’, www.nytimes.com/2006/01/01/movies/four-years-on-a-cabinseye-view-of-911.html.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. 1990a. ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover and the Attic orators: the social composition of the Athenian jury’, JHS 110: 146–73.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. 1990b. ‘The purpose of evidence in Athenian courts’, in Nomos: Essays in Athenian Law, Politics and Society, eds. Cartledge, P., Millett, P. and Todd, S. C.. Cambridge: 19–39.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. 1995. The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates: Text, Power, Pedagogy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Torrance, I. 2017. ‘Aeschylus and war’, in Aeschylus and War: Comparative Perspectives on Seven against Thebes, ed. Torrance, I.. Abingdon and New York: 1–8.Google Scholar
Trevett, J. 1996. ‘Did Demosthenes publish his deliberative speeches?’, Hermes 124: 425–41.Google Scholar
Trundle, M. 2010. ‘Light troops in classical Athens’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 139–60.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. 1983. ‘Lysias XIX, the Cypriot war and Thrasybulos’ naval expedition’, Philologus 127: 170–83.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 2018. ‘On the structure of Plato’s Menexenus’, in Speeches for the Dead: Essays on Plato’s ‘Menexenus’, eds. Parker, H. and Robitzsch, J. M.. Berlin: 51–70.Google Scholar
Tzanetou, A. 2005. ‘A generous city: pity in Athenian oratory and tragedy’, in Pity and Power in Ancient Athens, ed. Sternberg, R.. Cambridge: 98–122.Google Scholar
Uccello, C. 2014. ‘Performance and argumentation: the use of paradeigmata in Isocrates, Aeschines and Demosthenes’, in Papers on Rhetoric XII, eds. Montefusco Calboli, L. and Celentano, M. S.. Perugia: 221–32.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. (ed.) 1949. Sofisti: testimonianze e frammenti: volume II: Gorgia, Licofrone e Prodico. Florence.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. (ed.) 1961. Sofisti: testimonianze e frammenti: volume II: Gorgia, Licofrone e Prodico, 2nd ed. Florence.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. 2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago.Google Scholar
Usener, S. 1994. Isokrates, Platon und ihr Publikum: Hörer und Leser von Literatur im 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Usener, S. 2003. ‘Isokrates und sein Adressatenkreis: Strategien schriftlicher Kommunikation’, in Isokrates: Neue Ansätze zur Bewertung eines politischen Schriftstellers, ed. Orth, W.. Trier: 18–33.Google Scholar
Van Straten, F. T. 1981. ‘Gifts for the gods’, in Faith, Hope and Worship, ed. Versnel, H. S.. Leiden: 65–151.Google Scholar
Van Wees, H. 2011. ‘Defeat and destruction: the ethics of ancient Greek warfare’, in Böser Krieg, eds. Linder, M. and Tausend, S.. Graz: 69–110.Google Scholar
Vaughn, P. 1991. ‘The identification and the retrieval of the hoplite battle-dead’, in Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, ed. Hanson, V. D.. London and New York: 38–62.Google Scholar
Vellacott, P. 1975. Ironic Drama: A Study of Euripides’ Method and Meaning. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1988b. ‘Tensions and ambiguities in Greek tragedy’, in Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, eds. Vernant, J.-P., and Vidal-Naquet, P., tr. J. Lloyd. New York: 29–49.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1988c. ‘The god of tragic fiction’, in Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, eds. Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., tr. J. Lloyd. New York: 181–8.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1988d. ‘The historical moment of tragedy in Greece: some of the social and psychological conditions’, in Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, eds. Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., tr. J. Lloyd. New York: 23–8.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1988e. ‘The tragic subject: historicity and transhistoricity’, in Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, ed. Vernant, J. P. and Vidal-Naquet, P.. New York: 237–46.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1991. Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays, ed. and tr. Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 2006. Myth and Thought among the Greeks, tr. J. Lloyd and J. Fort, new ed. New York.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 2007. ‘Claude Mossé’, in Athènes et le politique: dans le sillage de Claude Mossé, eds. Schmitt Pantel, P. and de Polignac, F.. Paris: 13–16.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (eds.) 1988. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, tr. J. Lloyd. New York.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. 1981. Le chasseur noir: formes de pensée et formes de société. Paris.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. 1986. The Black Hunter: Forms of Thought and Forms of Society in the Greek World, tr. A. Szegedy-Maszak. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. 1988. ‘Oedipus between two cities: an essay on Oedipus at Colonus’, in Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, eds. Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., tr. J. Lloyd. New York: 161–80.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. and Loraux, N. 1995. ‘The formation of bourgeois Athens’, in Politics Ancient and Modern, ed. Vidal-Naquet, P., tr. J. Lloyd. Cambridge: 82–140.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. W. 1997. ‘Poet, public and “theatrocracy”: audience performance in classical Athens’, in Poet, Public and Performance in Ancient Greece, eds. Edmunds, L. and Wallace, R. W.. Baltimore: 97–111.Google Scholar
Walters, K. R. 1980. ‘Rhetoric as ritual: the semiotics of the Attic funeral oration’, Florilegium 2: 1–27.Google Scholar
Walters, K. R. 1981. ‘“We fought alone at Marathon”: historical falsification in the Attic funeral oration’, RhM 124: 204–11.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. 1984. ‘Die athenischen Strategen der Schlacht bei Chaironeia’, ZPE 55: 45–53.Google Scholar
Wareh, T. 2013. The Theory and Practice of Life: Isocrates and the Philosophers. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. 1983. ‘Perser oder Amazonen? Zu den Westmetopen des Parthenon’, AA: 203–8.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E. L. 1991. ‘The general as hoplite’, in Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, ed. Hanson, V. D.. London: 121–70.Google Scholar
Wienand, J. 2023. Der politische Tod: Gefallenenbestattung und Epitaphios Logos im demokratischen Athen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Willi, A. 2014. ‘The language(s) of comedy’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy, ed. Revermann, M.. Cambridge: 168–85.Google Scholar
Williams, H. 2004. ‘Death warmed up: the agency of bodies and bones in early Anglo-Saxon cremation rites’, Journal of Material Culture 9: 263–91.Google Scholar
Williams, H. 2015. ‘Towards an archaeology of cremation’, in The Analysis of Burned Human Remains, eds. Schmidt, C. W. and Symes, S., 2nd ed. London: 259–93.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 1996. ‘Tragic rhetoric: the use of tragedy and the tragic in the fourth century’, in Tragedy and the Tragic: Greek Theatre and Beyond, ed. Silk, M. S.. Bari: 310–31.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1990. ‘The ephebes’ song: tragōidia and polis’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysos?: Athenian Drama in Its Social Context, eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton: 20–62.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.) 1990. Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton.Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 2003. ‘Euripides: poietes sophos’, in Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Euripides, ed. Mossman, J.. Oxford: 47–63.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. 2002. Love among the Ruins: The Erotics of Democracy in Classical Athens. Princeton.Google Scholar
Wolf, F. A. 1789. Demosthenis oratio adversus Leptinem: cum scholiis veteribus et commentario perpetuo. Halle.Google Scholar
Wolpert, A. 2001. ‘The genealogy of diplomacy in classical Greece’, Diplomacy and Statecraft 12: 71–88.Google Scholar
Wolpert, A. 2002. Remembering Defeat: Civil War and Civic Memory in Ancient Athens. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Woodford, S. 1971. ‘Cults of Heracles in Attica’, in Studies Presented to George M. A. Hanfmann, eds. Mitten, D. G., Pedley, J. G. and Scott, J. A.. Mainz: 211–25.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. 2008. A Commentary on Demosthenes’ Philippic I: With Rhetorical Analyses of Philippics II and III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 1991. ‘Greek oratory, revision of speeches and the problem of historical reliability’, C&M 42: 55–74.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 1994. ‘History and oratorical exploitation’, in Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action, ed. Worthington, I.. London: 109–29.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 2000. ‘Demosthenes’ (in)activity during the reign of Alexander the Great’, in Demosthenes: Statesman and Orator, ed. Worthington, I.. London and New York: 90–113.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 2013. Demosthenes of Athens and the Fall of Classical Greece. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 2021. Athens after Empire: A History from Alexander the Great to the Emperor Hadrian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, M. 2005. Euripides’ Escape-Tragedies: A Study of Helen, Andromeda and Iphigenia among the Taurians. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yates, D. 2019. States of Memory: The Polis, Panhellenism and the Persian War. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yoshitake, S. 2010. ‘Aretē and the achievements of the war dead: the logic of praise in the Athenian funeral oration’, in War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, ed. Pritchard, D. M.. Cambridge: 359–77.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 1996. Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 2007. ‘Politics as literature: Demosthenes and the burden of the Athenian past’, in The Attic Orators, ed. Carawan, E.. Oxford: 372–90.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. 1990. ‘Thebes: theater of self and society in Athenian drama’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context, eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton: 130–67.Google Scholar
Zelcer, M. 2018. ‘Reading the Menexenus intertextually’, in Speeches for the Dead: Essays on Plato’s ‘Menexenus’, eds. Parker, H. and Robitzsch, J. M.. Berlin: 29–50.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. 1985. Untersuchungen zur Form und dramatischen Technik der aristophanischen Komödien: Band 1: Parodos und Amoibaion, 2nd ed. Meisenheim.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. 1993. ‘Aristophanes und die Intellektuellen’, in Aristophane, eds. Bremer, J. M. and Handley., E. W. Geneva: 255–80.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. 2019. ‘Rhetorik und Drama–Rhetorik im Drama’, in Handbuch antike Rhetorik, eds. Erler, M. and Tornau., C. Berlin: 599–626.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. E. 1981. Thucydides and the Tradition of Funeral Speeches at Athens. New York.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. E. 1994. ‘National and other contrasts in the Athenian funeral orations (with a response by Roy, J.)’, in The Birth of the European Identity: The Europe-Asia Contrast in Greek Thought 490–322 B.C., ed. Khan, H. A.. Nottingham: 1–43.Google Scholar