Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:54:09.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Matching markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Benny Moldovanu
Affiliation:
Chair of economic theory, University of Bonn
Maarten Janssen
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A basic goal of markets is to achieve a matching among buyers and sellers, or, more generally formulated, a matching between individual agents and physical objects or financial claims. In a commodity market (such as the market for gold) the price determines whether an agent decides to buy or to sell. But in many other markets (such as regulated labour markets, government-sponsored auctions or Beauty Contests for UMTS licences) the roles of the agents are relatively well defined: each agent operates on only one side of a bilateral market.

In auctions and in decentralised markets consisting of systems of overlapping bargained agreements the physical allocation of objects is accompanied by a determination of prices. In contrast, many other bilateral markets operate only on the matching dimension since, for various institutional reasons, money either does not enter the system or prices are determined exogenously. For example, many entry-level job markets focus on matching new graduates and potential employers at more or less fixed wages.

The theory of two-sided matching offers fundamental insights into the functioning of markets and identifies the main issues arising in the design of such markets. In particular, once money and prices are introduced in the models, this theory offers the basis of auction and market design. Moreover, there exist well-documented and successful large-scale applications that can guide further practical work. A broad conclusion is that markets require a good deal of organisation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Auctioning Public Assets
Analysis and Alternatives
, pp. 257 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausubel, L. and P. Milgrom 2001, ‘Ascending auctions with package bidding’, Discussion Paper, Stanford University
Demange, G. and Gale, D. 1985, ‘The strategy structure of two-sided Matching markets’, Econometrica 53: 873–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demange, G., Gale, D., and Sotomayor, M. 1986, ‘Multi-item auctions’, Journal of Political Economy 94: 863–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubins, L. and Freedman, D. 1981, ‘Machiavelli and the Gale–Shapley algorithm’, American Mathematical Monthly 88: 485–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, D. and Shapley, L. 1962, ‘College admissions and the stability of marriage’, American Mathematical Monthly 69: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gul, F. and Stacchetti, E. 1999, ‘Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes’, Journal of Economic Theory 87: 9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, A. and Crawford, V. 1982, ‘Job matching, coalition formation and gross substitutes’, Econometrica 50: 1483–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. 1999, ‘Putting auction theory to work: the simultaneous ascending auction’, Journal of Political Economy 108: 245–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. and Peranson, E. 1999, ‘The redesign of the matching market for American physicians’, American Economic Review 89: 748–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, A. and M. Sotomayor 1990, Two-sided Matching, Econometric Society Monograph No. 18, Cambridge University Press
Roth, A. and Xing, X. 1994, ‘Jumping the gun: imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions’, American Economic Review 84: 992–1044Google Scholar
Shapley, L. and Shubik, M. 1972, ‘The assignment game I: the core’, International Journal of Game Theory 1: 111–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickrey, W. 1961, ‘Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders’, Journal of Finance 16: 8–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Matching markets
  • Edited by Maarten Janssen, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Book: Auctioning Public Assets
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610844.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Matching markets
  • Edited by Maarten Janssen, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Book: Auctioning Public Assets
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610844.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Matching markets
  • Edited by Maarten Janssen, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Book: Auctioning Public Assets
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610844.012
Available formats
×