Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T15:31:25.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Mediating allegations of racism in a multiethnic London school: what speech communities and communities of practice can tell us about discourse and power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Angela Creese
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Education, School of Education, University of Birmingham
David Barton
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Karin Tusting
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In this paper, I will examine two approaches to the study of community to understand what kind of purchase they can give on a small piece of ethnographic data from a large multicultural London secondary school. The first approach has emerged from linguistic anthropology and is the notion of a speech community developed by Hymes (1968, 1972, 1974) and Gumperz (1972, 1982, 1999). The second is the community of practice developed by Lave and Wenger (1991) and Wenger (1998), and emerging from psychology and education, but also widely used today in management studies and by the commercial sector and its consultancies.

An argument is made that, despite its concern with shared repertoire, the learning theory of communities of practice lacks a coherent theory of language in use. Despite its emphasis on negotiation of meaning, we are given little insight into how meanings are made and interpreted. It lacks the infrastructure to explain the role language plays in social life. The notion of speech community, on the other hand, stems from the tradition of linguistic anthropology which has developed a coherent theory of language and the tools to describe and explain language use. Within the linguistic anthropological tradition, language is seen as working through a complex interplay of signs and symbols. Language is fundamentally social and performs a variety of functions, all of which define it as a cultural artefact which has its foundations in the organization of humankind and its culture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Communities of Practice
Language Power and Social Context
, pp. 55 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International (1995) Turkey: Unfulfilled promise of reform. September. AI Index: EUR 44/87/95
Amnesty International (1995) Turkey: Families of “disappeared” subjected to brutal treatment. September. AI Index: EUR 44/80/95
Blommaert, J. and Verschueren, J. (1998) Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. (1994) Kurds campaigner escapes shooting. The Guardian. December 31. p. 3Google Scholar
Creese, A. (2002) The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly 36 (4) 597–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creese, A. (2003) Language, ethnicity and the mediation of allegations of racism: Negotiating diversity and sameness in multilingual school discourses. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 6 (3–4) 221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. and S. McConnell-Ginet (1998) Communities of practice: where language, gender and power all live. In Coates, J. (ed), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: BlackledgeGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R.-L. (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eraut, M. (2002) Conceptual analysis and research questions: do the concepts of ‘learning community’ and ‘community of practice’ provide added value? Paper presented at AERA, New Orleans, LA; April 2002
Erickson, F. (1990) Qualitative methods. In Linn, R. L. and Erickson, F., Research in Teaching and Learning, vol. 2. New York: MacMillan Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. (1996) Ethnographic microanalysis. In McKay, S. L. and Hornberger, N. H. (eds), Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 283–306Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1972) Sociolinguistics and communication in small groups. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 203–224Google Scholar
Gumperz. J. J. (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds), Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. (2003) Semiotic Mediation, Language and Society: Three Exotripic Theories: Vygotsky, Halliday and Bernstein. [On-line] Available at: http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/pgc/sochasan.html. Accessed January 14, 2003
Hornberger, N. H. (1995) Ethnography in linguistic perspective: understanding school processes. Language and Education 9 (4) 233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1968). The ethnography of speaking. In Fishman, J. (ed), Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton, 99–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–293Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974) Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
Institute of Education (IOE) (1999) Turkish Cypriot Children in London Schools: A Report for the Turkish Cypriot Forum by the International Centre for Intercultural Studies and the Culture, Communication and Societies Group. London: University of London Institute of Education
Ladbury, S. (1977). The Turkish Cypriots: ethnic relations in London and Cyprus. Between Two Cultures. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning; Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. A. (1993) Reflexive Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLure, M. (2003) Discourse in Educational and Social Research. Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
Mehmet Ali, A. (1991). The Turkish speech community. Multilingualism in the British Isles, vol. I. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1993) Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. (1955) Collected Papers II. Philosophical writings of Peirce. Selected and edited with an introduction by Buchler, J.. New York: Dover. Orginally published as ‘The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1940Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1998) Speech community. In Verschueren, J., Ostman, J.-O., Blommaert, J. and Bulcan, C. (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Refugee Council (1995) Kurds: Turkish Kurdish refugees in the UK/Kurds in Turkey. Refugee Council Factsheet. January
Refugee Council (1995) Persecuted at home: destitute in the UK: don't put asylum seekers out on the streets. Flyer, Refugee Council
Sapir, E. (1921) Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. London: Hart-DaviesGoogle Scholar
Shaffif, W. B. (1991) Managing a convincing self-presentation: some personal reflections on entering the field. In Shaffif, W. B. and and Stebbins, R. A. (eds), Experiencing Fieldwork. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 72–81Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. (eds) (1996) The Natural History of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Vann, K. and G. C. Bowker (2002) Instrumentalizing the Truth of Practice. Paper presented at ISCRAT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2002
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1989) Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House PublishersGoogle Scholar
Wortham, S. (2003) Linguistic anthropology of education: an introduction. In Wortham, S. and Rymes, B. (eds), Linguistic Anthropology of Education. Westport: Praeger Press, 1–30Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×