Abbott, Craig S. 1976. “Offset Slur as Bibliographical Evidence,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 70: 538–41.Google Scholar

Agüera y Arcas, Blaise. 2003. “Temporary Matrices and Elemental Punches in Gutenberg's DK Type,” in Incunabula and Their Readers: Printing, Selling and Using Books in the Fifteenth Century, ed. Jensen, Kristian (London: British Library), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Ames, Joseph. 1749. Typographical Antiquities (London: Printed by W. Faden and sold by J. Robinson). Rev. William Herbert, 1785–90 (3 vols.; London: Printed for the editor). Rev. Thomas Frognall Dibdin, 1810–19 (4 vols.; London: Printed for William Miller by William Savage).Google Scholar

Amory, Hugh. 1996. “The Trout and the Milk: An Ethnobibliographical Talk,” Harvard Library Bulletin n.s. 7.1 (Spring): 50–65.Google Scholar

Aubin, Paul. See Tanselle 1993a.

Bain, D.C. 1940. “Some Notes on the Printing of the Summa de Exemplis, 1499,” The Library 4th series 21 (1940–41): 192–98.Google Scholar

Bain, Peter, and Shaw, Paul. 1999. “Blackletter: Type and National Identity,” Printing History 19.2/20.1: 1–80.Google Scholar

Baines, Phil. 1990. See Perfect 1983.

Baker, William. See Howard-Hill 1999.

Bald, R.C. 1942. “Evidence and Inference in Bibliography,” English Institute Annual 1941, pp. 159–83.Google Scholar

Ball, Douglas. 1985. Victorian Publishers' Bindings (London: Library Association; Williamsburg, Va.:Book Press).Google Scholar

Barber, Giles, and Fabian, Bernhard, eds. 1981. Buch und Buchhandel in Europa im achtzehnten Jahrhundert (Fünftes Wolfenbütteler Symposium, 1977; Hamburg:Ernst Hauswedell).

Barker, Nicolas. 1972a. Stanley Morison (London:Macmillan).Google Scholar

Barker, Nicolas. 1972b. See Morison 1972.

Barker, Nicolas. 1980. See Carter (J.) 1952.

Barker, Nicolas. 1981. “Typography and the Meaning of Words: The Revolution in the Layout of Books in the Eighteenth Century,” in Barber 1981, pp. 126–65.Google Scholar

Barker, Nicolas. 1983. See Carter (J.) 1934.

Barker, Nicolas. 1987. The Butterfly Books: An Enquiry into the Nature of Certain Twentieth Century Pamphlets (London:Bertram Rota).Google Scholar

Barker, Nicolas. 1990. “Reflections on the History of the Book,” The Book Collector 39: 9–26. Reprinted, 2003, in Form and Meaning in the History of the Book (London: British Library), pp. 269–78.Google Scholar

Bayfield, M.A. 1920. “Elizabethan Printing: An Instructive Blunder,” Times Literary Supplement, September 23, pp. 618–19. Followed by comments from Dover Wilson, J. (September 30, p. 636), Bayfield (October 14, pp. 667–68), Pollard, A. W. (October 21, p. 680), and Bayfield (November 11, p. 738).Google Scholar

Belanger, Terry. 2008. “A Short Description of the BAP [Book Arts Press] and RBS [Rare Book School],” in Book Arts Press Address Book (10th edn., March 2008; Charlottesville:Book Arts Press, University of Virginia), pp. 6–15 (supplemented by “The RBS Faculty & Their Courses, 1983–2008,” pp. 238–69, and “BAP/RBS Lectures 1–500, 1972–2007,” pp. 273–318).Google Scholar

Bennet, Thomas. 1715. An Essay on the Thirty Nine Articles of Religion, Agreed on in 1562, and Revised in 1571 (London:Printed by M. J. for W. Innys).Google Scholar

Benton, Megan L.See Gutjahr 2001.

The Bibliographical Society 1892–1942: Studies in Retrospect. 1945. (London:Bibliographical Society).

Bill, Max. 1946. See Burke 2000.

Blades, William. 1861. The Life and Typography of William Caxton (2 vols.; London:J. Lilly, 1861–63).Google Scholar

Blades, William. 1891. The Pentateuch of Printing, with a Chapter on Judges (London:Elliot Stock).Google Scholar

Bland, David. 1951. The Illustration of Books (London:Faber & Faber). 2nd edn., 1953 (Faber & Faber). 3rd edn., 1962 (Faber & Faber).Google Scholar

Bland, David. 1963. See Simon 1945.

Blayney, Peter W.M. 1982. The Texts of “King Lear” and Their Origins: Volume I, Nicholas Okes and the First Quarto (Cambridge:University Press). See also Blayney's letter in the Times Literary Supplement, January 27, 1984, p. 85.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W.M. 1991. The First Folio of Shakespeare (Washington:Folger Shakespeare Library).Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W.M. 1996. “Introduction to the Second Edition,” in The Norton Facsimile of the First Folio of Shakespeare, ed. Hinman, Charlton (New York:Norton), pp. xxvii–xxxvii. See also Hinman 1968.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Paul. 1928. See Sobry 1799.

Boghardt, Martin. See Needham 1994b.

Bond, William H. 1948. “Casting off Copy by Elizabethan Printers: A Theory,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 42: 281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornstein, George. 2001. Material Modernism: The Politics of the Page (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Bouma, Herman. See Kolers 1979, 1980.

Bowden, Ann. See Todd 1998b.

Bowers, Fredson. 1939. “Notes on Running-Titles as Bibliographical Evidence,” The Library 4th series 19 (1938–39): 315–38.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1942. “The Headline in Early Books,” English Institute Annual 1941, pp. 185–205. Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 199–211.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1947. “An Examination of the Method of Proof Correction in Lear,” The Library 5th series 2 (1947–48): 20–44. Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 212–39.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1949a. “Bibliography and the University,” University of Pennsylvania Library Chronicle 15: 37–51. Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1949b. Principles of Bibliographical Description (Princeton:University Press). See also Tanselle 1994.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1950. “Some Relations of Bibliography to Editorial Problems,” Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950–51): 37–62. Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1952. “Bibliography, Pure Bibliography, and Literary Studies,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 46: 186–208. Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1954. “Shakespeare's Text and the Bibliographical Method,” Studies in Bibliography 6: 71–91.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1955. On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists (Rosenbach Lectures 1954; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Library for the Rosenbach Foundation).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1959a. The Bibliographical Way (University of Kansas Publications, Library Series, no. 7; Lawrence:University of Kansas Libraries). Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 54–74.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1959b. Textual and Literary Criticism (Sandars Lectures 1958; Cambridge:University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1964. Bibliography and Textual Criticism (Lyell Lectures 1959; Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1965. [Discussion of compositorial stints], in Nathaniel Hawthorne, The House of the Seven Gables, ed. Bowers, (Centenary Edition, vol. 11; Columbus:Ohio State University Press), pp. xxxviii–lviii.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1966. Bibliography and Modern Librarianship (Berkeley:School of Librarianship; Los Angeles:School of Library Service, University of California). Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1971. “Four Faces of Bibliography,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 10: 33–45. Reprinted in Bowers 1975, pp. 94–108.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1975. Essays in Bibliography, Text, and Editing (Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia for the Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. 1977. [Biographical sketch of Charlton Joseph Kadio Hinman], The Book Collector 26: 389–91.Google Scholar

Brack, OM, Jr. See McMullin 1994.

Bradley, Henry. 1928. The Collected Papers (Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1870. A Classified Index of the Fifteenth Century Books in the Collection of M. J. De Meyer, Which Were Sold at Ghent in November, 1869 (Memoranda, no. 2; London:Macmillan, April 1870). Reprinted in Bradshaw 1889, pp. 206–36.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1889. Collected Papers, ed. Francis Jenkinson, F.J. (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1904. “Letters of Henry Bradshaw to Officials of the British Museum,” ed. Pollard, A.W., The Library 2nd series 5: 266–92, 431–42.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1909. “Eleven Letters from Henry Bradshaw to S. W. Lawley,” ed. Jenkinson, Francis, in Fasciculus Ioanni Willis Clark dicatus (Cambridge: Privately printed at the University Press), pp. 115–34.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1966. Henry Bradshaw's Correspondence on Incunabula with J. W. Holtrop and M. F. A. G. Campbell, ed. Wytze, and Hellinga, Lotte (2 vols.; Amsterdam: Menno Hertzberger, 1966, and A. L. Van Gendt, 1978).

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1972. “Henry Bradshaw's Correspondentië met Ferdinand Vander Haeghen,” ed. Machiels, J., Archives et bibliothèques de Belgique 43: 598–614.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1980. “Henry Bradshaw and M.F.A.G. Campbell: Some Further Correspondence,” ed. McKitterick, David, in Hellinga Festschrift (Amsterdam: Israel), pp. 335–38.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1981. “Henry Bradshaw and J.W.Holtrop: Some Further Correspondence,” ed. McKitterick, David, Quaerendo 11: 128–64.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Henry. 1860ff. See Bradshaw 1904, 1909, 1966, 1972, 1980, 1981.

Bradshaw, Henry. 1984. Henry Bradshaw, 1831–1886, ed. Stokes, Roy (The Great Bibliographers Series, no. 6; Metuchen, N.J.:Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar

Bray, Joe. See McLeod 2000.

Briem, Gunnlaugur S.E.et al. 1987. “A Visible Tribute to Merald Wrolstad, 1923–1987,” Visible Language 21.1 (Winter): 3–15.Google Scholar

,British Association for the Advancement of Science. 1912. Report on the Influence of School-Books upon Eyesight (London:The Association).Google Scholar

Bronson, Bertrand H. 1958. “Printing as an Index of Taste in Eighteenth-Century England,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 62: 371–87, 443–62. Reprinted, 1958, as a pamphlet (New York:Public Library). Reprinted, 1968, in Facets of the Enlightenment: Studies in English Literature and Its Contexts (Berkeley:University of California Press), pp. 326–65.Google Scholar

Brooks, Douglas A.See Maguire 2005.

Bruccoli, Matthew J. 1957. James Branch Cabell: A Bibliography, Part II. Notes on the Cabell Collections at the University of Virginia (Charlottesville:University of Virginia Press).Google Scholar

Bruccoli, Matthew J. 1958. “Textual Variants in Sinclair Lewis's Babbitt,” Studies in Bibliography 11: 263–68.Google Scholar

Bruccoli, Matthew J. 1963. “Concealed Printings in Hawthorne,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 57: 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bühler, Curt F. 1948. “The Headlines of William de Machlinia's Year-Book, 37 Henry VI,” Studies in Bibliography 1 (1948–49): 125–32.Google Scholar

Bühler, Curt F. 1949. [Review of Studies in Bibliography 1 (1948–49)], Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 43: 227–29.CrossRef

Bühler, Curt F. 1957. “Watermarks and the Dates of Fifteenth-Century Books,” Studies in Bibliography 9: 217–24. Reprinted in Early Books and Manuscripts: Forty Years of Research (New York:Grolier Club and Pierpont Morgan Library, 1973), pp. 257–65. [Cf. Needham 1994a, pp. 50–52.]Google Scholar

Burke, Christopher, and Kinross, Robin, eds. 2000. “The Dispute between Max Bill and Jan Tschichold of 1946, with a Later Contribution [1948] by Paul Renner,” Typography Papers 4: 57–90.

Burnhill, Peter. 1970. “Typographic Education: Headings in Text,” Journal of Typographic Research 4: 353–65.Google Scholar

Burnhill, Peter. 1971, 1981. See Hartley 1971, 1981.

Burt, Cyril. 1955. “A Psychological Study of Typography,” British Journal of Statistical Psychology 8.1: 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Cyril. 1959. A Psychological Study of Typography, with introduction by Morison, Stanley (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Cahill, Thomas A.See Schwab 1983.

Campbell, M.F.A.G. 1870ff. See Bradshaw 1966, 1980.

Capell, Edward, ed. 1760. Prolusions; or, Select Pieces of Antient Poetry (London:J. & R. Tonson).Google Scholar

Carpenter, Kenneth E.See Tanselle 1983.

Carter, Harry. 1958. See Moxon 1683.

Carter, John. 1932. Binding Variants in English Publishing, 1820–1900 (Bibliographia, no. 6; London:Constable; New York: Ray Long & Richard R. Smith).Google Scholar

Carter, John. 1934. Carter and Graham Pollard, An Enquiry into the Nature of Certain Nineteenth Century Pamphlets (London:Constable; New York: Charles Scribner's Sons). Reprinted, 1983, with an epilogue, and with notes by Nicolas Barker and John Collins (London: Scolar Press); accompanied, in a separate volume, by Barker and Collins's A Sequel to “An Enquiry” (London: Scolar Press).Google Scholar

Carter, John. 1948. Taste and Technique in Book-Collecting (Sandars Lectures 1947; New York:R.R. Bowker; Cambridge: University Press). Reprinted, 1970, with an epilogue (London: Private Libraries Association).Google Scholar

Carter, John. 1952. ABC for Book-Collectors (London:Hart-Davis). 6th edn., 1980, rev. Nicolas Barker (London: Granada). 8th edn., 2004, with Barker as coauthor (New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press; London: British Library).Google Scholar

Carter, John. 1958. “Michael Sadleir: A Valediction,” The Book Collector 7: 58–61.Google Scholar

Chapman, R.W. 1924. “Notes on Cancel Leaves,” The Library 4th series 5 (1924–25): 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, R.W. 1930. Cancels (Bibliographia, no. 3; London:Constable; New York: Richard R. Smith).Google Scholar

Chartier, Roger. See Martin 1982.

Church, Margaret. 1946. “The First English Pattern Poems,” PMLA 61: 636–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Adam. 1806. The Bibliographical Miscellany (2 vols.; London:W. Baynes).Google Scholar

Clegg, Cyndia Susan. See McLeod 2005.

Collins, John. 1983. See Carter (J.) 1934.

Conley, Tom. 1992. The Graphic Unconscious in Early Modern French Writing (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Copinger, W.A. 1893. “Inaugural Address,” Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 1 (1892–93): 29–59.Google Scholar

Copinger, W.A. 1894. “Presidential Address,” Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 2 (1893–94): 103–22.Google Scholar

Crutchley, Brooke. See Sparrow 1967.

Daly, Peter M.See Heninger 1988.

Darnton, Robert. 1979. The Business of Enlightenment: A Publishing History of the “Encyclopédie,” 1775–1800 (Cambridge, Mass.:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Davis, Herbert. 1957. [Review of Studies in Bibliography 7 (1955)], Review of English Studies n.s. 8: 215–17.CrossRef

Davis, Herbert. 1958. See Moxon 1683.

Davison, Peter. 1972. “Science, Method, and the Textual Critic,” Studies in Bibliography 25: 1–28.Google Scholar

Davison, Peter. 1977. “The Selection and Presentation of Bibliographic Evidence,” Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography 1: 101–36.Google Scholar

Davison, Peter, ed. 1992. The Book Encompassed: Studies in Twentieth-Century Bibliography (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E. 1961. “Guide-Lines in Small Formats (about 1600),” Studies in Bibliography 14: 206–8.Google Scholar

Dawson, Robert. 2004. “Notes on Press-Figures in France and the Localization of Books during the Later 18th Century,” Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 28.3: 97–121.Google Scholar

Day, Kenneth. See Morison 1963b.

Dibdin, Thomas Frognall. 1810. See Ames 1749.

Dickinson, Donald C. 2004. John Carter: The Taste & Technique of a Bookman (New Castle, Del.:Oak Knoll Press).Google Scholar

Doh, Herman. 1974. “Compositorial Responsibility in Fortune by Land and Sea, 1655,” The Library 5th series 29: 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, Madeleine. 1942. “An Evaluation of Evidence in Shakespearean Textual Criticism,” English Institute Annual 1941, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar

Draudt, Manfred. 1987. “The Rationale of Current Bibliographical Methods: Printing House Studies, Computer-Aided Compositor Studies, and the Use of Statistical Methods,” Shakespeare Survey 40: 145–53. [Cf. Jackson (M. P.) 1989.]Google Scholar

Dreyfus, John. See Morison 1963a.

Drucker, Johanna. 1991. “Typographic Manipulation of the Poetic Text in the Early Twentieth-Century Avant-Garde,” Visible Language 25: 231–56.Google Scholar

Drucker, Johanna. 1994. The Visible Word: Experimental Typography and Modern Art, 1909–1923 (Chicago:University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Drucker, Johanna. 1995. The Alphabetic Labyrinth: The Letters in History and Imagination (New York:Thames & Hudson).Google Scholar

Eggert, Paul. 1995. “A Cautionary Tale: Stop-Press Correction in The Recollections of Geoffry Hamlyn (1859) [by Henry Kingsley],” Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 19: 267–69.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change (2 vols.; Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Elam, Kimberly. 1990. Expressive Typography: The Word as Image (New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold).Google Scholar

Erdman, David V., and Fogel, Ephim G., eds. 1966. Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution (Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press).

Erne, Lukas. See Honigmann 2004.

Esrock, Ellen J. 1994. The Reader's Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response (Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Ezell, Margaret J.M., and O'Brien O'Keeffe, Katherine, eds. 1994. Cultural Artifacts and the Production of Meaning: The Page, the Image, and the Body (Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press).

Fabian, Bernhard. See Barber 1981.

Farnham, Willard. 1916. “Colloquial Contractions in Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger, and Shakespeare as a Test of Authorship,” PMLA 31: 326–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farr, Cecilia Konchar. 2005. Reading the Graphic Surface: The Presence of the Book in Prose Fiction (Manchester:University Press).Google Scholar

Febvre, Lucien, and Martin, Henri-Jean. 1958. L'Apparition du livre (Paris:Albin Michel). Translated, 1976, by David Gerard as The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450–1800 (London:NLB).Google Scholar

Fisher, Dennis F.See Wrolstad 1986.

Fleeman, J.D. 1964. “William Somervile's The Chace, 1735,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 58: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleeman, J.D. 2000. A Bibliography of the Works of Samuel Johnson, ed. McLaverty, James (2 vols.; Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Fleming, Patricia Lockhart. 1988. Upper Canadian Imprints, 1801–1841: A Bibliography (Toronto:University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar

Flores, R.M. 1975. The Compositors of the First and Second Madrid Editions of “Don Quixote” Part I (London:Modern Humanities Research Association).Google Scholar

Fogel, Ephim G.See Erdman 1966.

Foot, Mirjam. 1998. The History of Bookbinding as a Mirror of Society (Panizzi Lectures 1997; London:British Library).Google Scholar

Foster, Stephen C., ed. 1987. “The Avant-Garde and the Text,” Visible Language 21.3–4 (Summer-Autumn).Google Scholar

Foxon, David. 1956. “On Printing at One Pull and Distinguishing Impressions by Point-Holes,” The Library 5th series 11: 284–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foxon, David. 1970. Thoughts on the History and Future of Bibliographical Description (Los Angeles:School of Library Service; Berkeley: School of Librarianship, University of California).Google Scholar

Foxon, David. 1975. English Verse 1701–1750: A Catalogue of Separately Printed Poems with Notes on Contemporary Collected Editions (2 vols.; Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Foxon, David. 1991. Alexander Pope and the Early Eighteenth-Century Book Trade, ed. McLaverty, James L. (Lyell Lectures 1976; Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Francis, F.C. 1945. “The Bibliographical Society: A Sketch of the First Fifty Years,” in The Bibliographical Society 1945, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Gants, David L. 2004. “The Early English Booktrade Database,” www.lib.unb.ca/Texts/Gants/EEBD/.

Gardner, Helen. 1969, 1970. See Wilson (F.P.) 1945, 1959.

Gascoigne, Bamber. 1986. How to Identify Prints: A Complete Guide to Manual and Mechanical Processes from Woodcut to Ink Jet (New York:Thames & Hudson).Google Scholar

Gaskell, Philip. 1949. “Eighteenth Century Press Numbers: Their Use and Usefulness,” The Library 5th series 4 (1949–50): 249–61.Google Scholar

Gaskell, Philip. 1959. John Baskerville: A Bibliography (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Gaskell, Philip. 1972. A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford:Clarendon Press). Corrected printing, 1974.Google Scholar

Gaskell, Roger. 2004. “Printing House and Engraving Shop: A Mysterious Collaboration,” The Book Collector 53: 213–51.Google Scholar

Gerard, David. 1976. See Febvre 1958.

Gibson, Strickland. 1951. “Thomas Bennet, a Forgotten Bibliographer,” The Library 5th series 6: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, David. 1982. A Bibliography of Jane Austen (Soho Bibliographies, no. 21; Oxford:Clarendon Press). Rev. edn., 1997 (Winchester: St. Paul's Bibliographies; New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press).Google Scholar

Glaister, Geoffrey Ashall. 1960. Glossary of the Book (London:Allen & Unwin). Rev. edn., 1979 (Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar

Goldfinch, John. See Needham 1987.

Grant, John Cameron.See Legros 1916.

Graphic Forms: The Arts as Related to the Book. 1949. (Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.)

Gray, Nicolete. 1960. Lettering on Buildings (London:Architectural Press).Google Scholar

Gray, Nicolete. 1974. “Lettering and Society,” Visible Language 8: 247–60.Google Scholar

Gray, Nicolete. 1986. A History of Lettering: Creative Experiment and Letter Identity (Oxford:Phaidon).Google Scholar

Greetham, D.C.See Tanselle 1995b.

Greg, W.W. 1906. See Pollard (A. W.) 1906b.

Greg, W.W. 1908. “On Certain False Dates in Shakespearian Quartos,” The Library 2nd series 9: 113–31, 381–409. Reprinted in Greg 1998, pp. 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1914. “What Is Bibliography?,” Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 12 (1911–13): 39–53. Reprinted in Greg 1966, pp. 75–88, and in Greg 1998, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1921. “The Printing of the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio of 1647,” The Library 4th series 2 (1921–22): 109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1930. “The Present Position of Bibliography,” The Library 4th series 11 (1930–31): 241–62. Reprinted in Greg 1966, pp. 207–25, and in Greg 1998, pp. 119–34.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1932. “Bibliography – An Apologia,” The Library 4th series 13 (1932–33): 133–43. Reprinted in Greg 1966, pp. 239–66, and in Greg 1998, pp. 135–57.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1933. “The Function of Bibliography in Literary Criticism Illustrated in a Study of the Text of King Lear,” Neophilologus 19: 241–62. Reprinted in Greg 1966, pp. 267–97, and in Greg 1998, pp. 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1934. “A Formulary of Collation,” The Library 4th series 14 (1933–34): 365–82. Reprinted in Greg 1966, pp. 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1939. A Bibliography of the English Printed Drama to the Restoration (Illustrated Monographs, no. 24; 4 vols.; London:Bibliographical Society, 1939–59).Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1940a. “Ronald Brunlees McKerrow, 1872–1940,” Proceedings of the British Academy 26: 488–515 (and as a separate). Reprinted in McKerrow 1974, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1940b. The Variants in the First Quarto of “King Lear”: A Bibliographical and Critical Inquiry (London:Oxford University Press for the Bibliographical Society). Partially reprinted in Greg 1998, pp. 187–200.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1942. The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of the Text (Clark Lectures 1939; Oxford:Clarendon Press). 2nd edn., 1951 (Clarendon Press). 3rd edn., 1954 (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1945. “Bibliography – A Retrospect,” in The Bibliographical Society 1945, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1950a. “The Rationale of Copy-Text,” Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950–51): 19–36. Reprinted in Greg 1966, pp. 374–91, and in Greg 1998, pp. 213–28.Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1950b. [Review of Studies in Bibliography 1 (1948–49)], Modern Language Review 45: 76.CrossRef

Greg, W.W. 1955. The Shakespeare First Folio: Its Bibliographical and Textual History (Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1960. Biographical Notes 1877–1947 (Oxford:New Bodleian Library).Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1966. Collected Papers, ed. Maxwell, J.C. (Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Greg, W.W. 1998. Sir Walter Wilson Greg: A Collection of His Writings, ed. Rosenblum, Joseph (The Great Bibliographers Series, no. 11; Lanham, Md.:Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar

Grendler, Paul F. 1993 “Form and Function in Italian Renaissance Popular Books,” Renaissance Quarterly 46: 451–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutjahr, Paul C., and Benton, Megan L., eds. 2001. Illuminating Letters: Typography and Literary Interpretation (Amherst:University of Massachusetts Press).

Haebler, Konrad. 1905. Typenrepertorium der Wiegendrucke (5 vols.; Halle:R. Haupt, etc., 1905–24).Google Scholar

Hailey, R. Carter. 2005. “The Shakespearian Pavier Quartos Revisited,” Studies in Bibliography 57 (2005–6): 151–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Anthony. 1986. “The White Devil in Nicholas Okes's Shop,” Studies in Bibliography 39: 135–76.Google Scholar

Handley, Miriam. See McLeod 2000.

Harris, Michael. See Roberts 1988.

Harris, Neil. 2004a. “Analytical Bibliography: An Alternative Prospectus,” http://ihl.enssib.fr/siteihl.php?page=55.

Harris, Neil. 2004b. “The Blind Impressions in the Aldine Hypnerotomachia Poliphili,” Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 2004, pp. 93–146.Google Scholar

Harris, Neil. 2006. “Tribal Lays and the History of the Fingerprint,” in Many into One: Problems and Opportunities in Creating Shared Catalogues of Older Books, ed. Shaw, David J. (London:Consortium of European Research Libraries), pp. 21–72. Reprinted, 2007, as a pamphlet with two pages of errata.Google Scholar

Hartley, James. 1971. Hartley and Peter Burnhill, “Experiments with Unjustified Text,” Visible Language 5: 265–77.Google Scholar

Hartley, James. 1978. Designing Instructional Text (London:Kogan Page).Google Scholar

Hartley, James, ed. 1980. The Psychology of Written Communication: Selected Readings (London:Kogan Page).

Hartley, James, and Peter, Burnhill, eds. 1981. “The Spatial Arrangement of Text,” Visible Language 15.1 (Winter).

Hartwig, Otto. See Wallau 1900.

Harvey, Ross. See McKitterick 1993a.

Hayford, Harrison. See Tanselle 1991a.

Hazen, Allen T. 1942. A Bibliography of the Strawberry Hill Press (New Haven:Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Heller, Scott. 1996. “Visual Images Replace Text as Focal Point for Many Scholars,” Chronicle of Higher Education, July 19, pp. A8-A9, A15.Google Scholar

Hellinga, Lotte. 1966. See Bradshaw 1966.

Hellinga, Lotte. 1982. Caxton in Focus: The Beginning of Printing in England (London:British Library).Google Scholar

Hellinga, Lotte. 1987. See Needham 1987.

Hellinga, Lotte. 1989. “Analytical Bibliography and the Study of Early Printed Books with a Case-Study of the Mainz Catholicon,” Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 1989, pp. 47–96.Google Scholar

Hellinga, Lotte, ed. 2007. Catalogue of Books Printed in the XVth Century Now in the British Library (BMC Part XI: England; ‘t Goy-Houten, Netherlands:Hes & De Graaf). Includes essays by Hellinga on “Methods of Production,” pp. 19–36, and on “Printing Types and Other Typographical Material,” pp. 335–50.

Hellinga, Wytze. See Bradshaw 1966.

Heninger, S.K. 1988. “The Typographical Layout of Spenser's Shepheardes Calender,” in Word and Visual Imagination: Studies in the Interaction of English Literature and the Visual Arts, ed. Höltgen, Karl Josef, Daly, Peter M., and Lottes, Wolfgang (Erlangen:Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg), pp. 33–71.Google Scholar

Henry, Anne C.See McLeod 2000.

Herbert, William. 1785. See Ames 1749.

Higgins, Dick. 1987. Pattern Poetry: Guide to an Unknown Literature (Albany:State University of New York).Google Scholar

Hill, W. Speed. 1999. “Where Are the Bibliographers of Yesteryear?,” in Pilgrimage for Love: New Essays in Early Modern Literature in Honor of Josephine A. Roberts, ed. King, Sigrid (Tempe:Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies), pp. 115–32.Google Scholar

Hinman, Charlton. 1940. “Principles Governing the Use of Variant Spellings as Evidence of Alternate Setting by Two Compositors,” The Library 4th series 21 (1940–41): 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinman, Charlton. 1942. “New Uses for Headlines as Bibliographical Evidence,” English Institute Annual 1941, pp. 207–22.Google Scholar

Hinman, Charlton. 1955. “Cast-Off Copy for the First Folio of Shakespeare,” Shakespeare Quarterly 6: 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinman, Charlton. 1963. The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare (2 vols.; Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Charlton, Hinman, ed. 1968. The Norton Facsimile of the First Folio of Shakespeare (New York:Norton). See also Blayney 1996.

Hobson, Anthony. 1989. Humanists and Bookbinders: The Origins and Diffusion of the Humanistic Bookbinding 1459–1559 (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Hodnett, Edward. 1988. Five Centuries of English Book Illustration (Aldershot:Scolar Press).Google Scholar

Höltgen, Karl Josef.See Heninger 1988.

Holtrop, J.W. 1856. Monuments typographiques des Pays-Bas au quinzième siècle (The Hague:Nijhoff, 1856–68).Google Scholar

Holtrop, J.W. 1864ff. See Bradshaw 1966, 1981.

Honigmann, E.A.J. 1965a. “Spelling Tests and the First Quarto of King Lear,” The Library 5th series 20: 310–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honigmann, E.A.J. 1965b. The Stability of Shakespeare's Text (London:Edward Arnold; Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar

Honigmann, E.A.J. 2004. “The New Bibliography and Its Critics,” in Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare's Drama, ed. Erne, Lukas and Kidnie, Margaret Jane (Cambridge:University Press), pp. 77–93.Google Scholar

Horne, Thomas Hartwell. 1814. An Introduction to the Study of Bibliography (London:Printed by G. Woodfall for T. Cadell and W. Davies).Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1963. “Spelling and the Bibliographer,” The Library 5th series 18: 1–28. Signed “T. H. Hill.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1972. Ralph Crane and Some Shakespeare First Folio Comedies (Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia for the Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1973. “The Compositors of Shakespeare's Folio Comedies,” Studies in Bibliography 26: 61–106.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1976. Compositors B and E in the Shakespeare First Folio and Some Recent Studies (Columbia, S.C.:Distributed as reproduced typescript).Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1977. A Reassessment of Compositors B and E in the First Folio Tragedies (Columbia, S.C.:Distributed as reproduced typescript).Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1980. “New Light on Compositor E of the Shakespeare First Folio,” The Library 6th series 2: 156–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 1999. “Alice Walker,” in Twentieth-Century British Book Collectors and Bibliographers, First Series, ed. Baker, William and Womack, Kenneth (Dictionary of Literary Biography, vol. 201; Detroit:Gale Research), pp. 297–305.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T.H. 2006. “Early Modern Printers and the Standardization of English Spelling,” Modern Language Review 101: 16–29.Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus. 1955. “The Shares of Fletcher and His Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon,” Studies in Bibliography 8 (1956): 129–46; 9 (1957): 143–62; 11 (1958): 85–106; 12 (1959): 91–116; 13 (1960): 77–108; 14 (1961): 45–67; 15 (1962): 71–90.Google Scholar

Huey, Edmund Burke. 1908. The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading (New York:Macmillan).Google Scholar

Immroth, John Phillip. See McKerrow 1974.

Jackson, MacD.P. 1989. [Comments on Draudt 1987], Shakespeare Survey 42: 208–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, William A. 1954. “Printed Quire and Sheet Numbers,” Harvard Library Bulletin 6: 96–102, 363–74.Google Scholar

Jacob, Henry. See Warde 1955.

Janssen, Frans A. 1995. “Layout as Means of Identification,” Quaerendo 25: 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkinson, Francis. 1889. “Prefatory Note,” in Bradshaw 1889, p. v. Signed “F. J.”

Jenkinson, Francis. 1909. See Bradshaw 1909.

Jensen, Kristian. See Agüera y Arcas 2003.

Johnson, A.F. 1934. Type Designs: Their History and Development (London:Grafton). 2nd edn., 1959 (London: Grafton). 3rd edn., 1966 (London: Deutsch).Google Scholar

Johnson, Barry C. 1985. Lost in the Alps: A Portrait of Robert Proctor, the “Great Bibliographer,” and of His Career in the British Museum (London:Privately printed).Google Scholar

Johnson, Francis R. 1933. A Critical Bibliography of the Works of Edmund Spenser Printed before 1700 (Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins Press).Google Scholar

Jowett, John. See Wells 1987.

Kaufmann, Michael. 1994. Textual Bodies: Modernism, Postmodernism, and Print (Lewisburg, Pa.:Bucknell University Press).Google Scholar

Kidnie, Margaret Jane.See Honigmann 2004.

King, Edmund M.B. 2003. Victorian Decorated Trade Bindings, 1830–1880: A Descriptive Bibliography (London:British Library; New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press).Google Scholar

King, Sigrid. See Hill 1999.

Kinross, Robin. 1997. “Type as Critique,” Typography Papers 2: 77–87.Google Scholar

Kinross, Robin. 2000. See Burke 2000.

Kirschbaum, Leo. 1957. [Review of Studies in Bibliography 9 (1957)], Shakespeare Quarterly 8: 544–46.CrossRef

Kirsop, Wallace. See McKitterick 1993a.

Knotts, Walter E. 1949. “Press Numbers as a Bibliographical Tool: A Study of Gay's The Beggar's Opera, 1728,” Harvard Library Bulletin 3: 198–212.Google Scholar

Kolers, Paul A., Wrolstad, Merald E., and Bouma, Herman, eds. 1979. Processing of Visible Language: Volume I (New York:Plenum Press).CrossRef

Kolers, Paul A., Wrolstad, Merald E., and Bouma, Herman, eds. 1980. Processing of Visible Language 2 (New York:Plenum Press).CrossRef

Krupp, Andrea. 2006. “Bookcloth in England and America, 1823–50,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 100 (2006): 25–87. Reprinted, 2008, in revised form as a separate (New Castle, Del.:Oak Knoll Press; London: British Library; New York: Bibliographical Society of America).Google Scholar

Kusko, Bruce H.See Schwab 1983.

Kyles, Gillian G.M. 1999. “Alteration of Leading within Editions,” Studies in Bibliography 52: 187–91.Google Scholar

Lancaster, John. See Maslen 1991.

Lappin, Linda. 1993. See Petrucci 1986.

Lavagnino, John. See Weiss 2007.

Lee, Marshall. 1965. Bookmaking: The Illustrated Guide to Design & Production (New York:Bowker). 2nd edn., 1979 (New York: Bowker). 3rd edn., 2004 (New York: Norton).Google Scholar

Lee, Sidney. 1902. “Introduction,” in Shakespeare Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies: Being a Reproduction in Facsimile of the First Folio Edition, 1623 (Oxford:Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Legros, Lucien Alphonse, and Grant, John Cameron. 1916. Typographical Printing-Surfaces: The Technology and Mechanism of Their Production (London:Longmans, Green).Google Scholar

Lepschy, Anna Laura.See Paisey 1986.

Levenston, Edward A. 1992. The Stuff of Literature: Physical Aspects of Texts and Their Relation to Literary Meaning (Albany:State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Levin, Edward S.See Morris 2000.

Littau, Karin. 2006. Theories of Reading: Books, Bodies, and Bibliomania (Cambridge:Polity Press).Google Scholar

Lottes, Wolfgang. See Heninger 1988.

Love, Harold. 2001. “The Intellectual Heritage of Donald Francis McKenzie,” The Library 7th series 2: 266–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, Harold. 2002. Authorship and Attribution: An Introduction (Cambridge:University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luborsky, Ruth Samson. 1980. “The Allusive Presentation of The Shepheardes Calender,” Spenser Studies 1: 29–67.Google Scholar

Machiels, J.See Bradshaw 1972.

Maguire, Laurie E. 1996. “The Rise of the New Bibliography,” in Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The “Bad” Quartos and Their Contexts (Cambridge:University Press), pp. 21–71, 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maguire, Laurie E. 2005. “How Many Children Had Alice Walker?,” in Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England, ed. Brooks, Douglas A. (Aldershot, Hampshire, and Burlington, Vt.:Ashgate), pp. 327–50.Google Scholar

Maittaire, Michael. 1719. Annales typographici (5 vols.; The Hague:Isaac Vaillant, 1719–41).Google Scholar

Martin, Henri-Jean. 1958. See Febvre 1958.

Martin, Henri-Jean. 1982. Histoire de l'édition française, ed. Martin, Roger Chartier, and Vivet, Jean-Pierre (4 vols.; Paris:Promodis, 1982–86).Google Scholar

Maslen, K.I.D. 1968. “Point-Holes as Bibliographical Evidence,” The Library 5th series 23: 240–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslen, K.I.D., and John, Lancaster, eds. 1991. The Bowyer Ledgers: The Printing Accounts of William Bowyer Father and Son Reproduced on Microfiche with a Checklist of Bowyer Printing 1699–1777, a Commentary, Indexes, and Appendixes (London:Bibliographical Society; New York: Bibliographical Society of America).

Masters, Richard. See Tomlinson 1996.

Maxwell, J.C. See Greg 1966.

McDonald, Peter D.See McKenzie 2002.

McGann, Jerome. 1991a. The Textual Condition (Princeton:University Press).Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome. 1991b. “What Is Critical Editing?,” Text 5: 15–29. Reprinted in revised form in McGann 1991a, pp. 48–68.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome. 1993. Black Riders: The Visible Language of Modernism (Princeton:University Press).Google Scholar

McIlwraith, A.K. 1930. “Some Bibliographical Notes on Massinger,” The Library 4th series 11 (1930–31): 87–91.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1966. The Cambridge University Press, 1696–1712: A Bibliographical Study (2 vols.; Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1969. “Printers of the Mind: Some Notes on Bibliographical Theories and Printing-House Practices,” Studies in Bibliography 22: 1–75. Reprinted in McKenzie 2002, pp.13–85.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1973. “'Indenting the Stick' in the First Quarto of King Lear (1608),” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 67: 125–30. Reprinted in McKenzie 2002, pp.86–90..CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1976. The London Book Trade in the Later Seventeenth Century (Sandars Lectures 1976; distributed as reproduced typescript).Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1981. “Typography and Meaning: The Case of William Congreve,” in Barber 1981, pp. 81–125. Reprinted in McKenzie 2002, pp.198–236.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1986. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (Panizzi Lectures 1985; London:British Library). Reprinted in McKenzie 1999, pp. 7–76.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1992. “History of the Book,” in Davison 1992, pp. 290–301.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1993. “What's Past is Prologue”: The Bibliographical Society and History of the Book (Centenary Lecture 1992; Hearthstone Publications). Reprinted in McKenzie 2002, pp. 259–75.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 1999. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (Cambridge:University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKenzie, D.F. 2002. Making Meaning: “Printers of the Mind” and Other Essays, ed. McDonald, Peter D. and Suarez, Michael F. (Amherst:University of Massachusetts Press).Google Scholar

McKerrow, Ronald B. 1913. Printers' & Publishers' Devices in England & Scotland, 1485–1640 (Illustrated Monographs, no. 16; London:Bibliographical Society).Google Scholar

McKerrow, Ronald B. 1914. “Notes on Bibliographical Evidence for Literary Students and Editors of English Works of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 12 (1911–13): 211–318.Google Scholar

McKerrow, Ronald B. 1925. “Elizabethan Printers and the Composition of Reprints,” The Library 4th series 5 (1924–25): 357–64. Reprinted in McKerrow 1974, pp.80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKerrow, Ronald B. 1927. An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students (Oxford:Clarendon Press). Corrected printing, 1928. See also McKitterick 1994.Google Scholar

McKerrow, Ronald B. 1931. “The Elizabethan Printer and Dramatic Manuscripts,” The Library 4th series 12 (1931–32): 253–75. Reprinted in McKerrow 1974, pp.139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKerrow, Ronald B. 1974. Ronald Brunlees McKerrow: A Selection of His Writings, ed. Immroth, John Phillip (The Great Bibliographers Series, no. 1; Metuchen, N.J.:Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar

McKitterick, David. 1980. See Bradshaw 1980; Morison 1980.

McKitterick, David. 1981. See Bradshaw 1981.

McKitterick, David. 1983. The Sandars and Lyell Lectures: A Checklist (New York:Jonathan A. Hill).Google Scholar

McKitterick, David. 1986. Cambridge University Library, a History: The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

McKitterick, David. 1992. A History of Cambridge University Press (3 vols.; Cambridge:University Press, 1992–2004).Google Scholar

McKitterick, David. 1993a. “The Acceptable Face of Print,” in An Index of Civilisation: Studies in Printing and Publishing History in Honour of Keith Maslen, ed. Harvey, Ross, Kirsop, Wallace, and McMullin, B.J. (Clayton, Victoria: Centre for Bibliographical and Textual Studies, Monash University), pp. 15–30.Google Scholar

McKitterick, David. 1993b. “Old Faces and New Acquaintances: Typography and the Association of Ideas,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 87: 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKitterick, David. 1994. “Introduction,” in Ronald B. McKerrow, An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students (1994 printing; Winchester:St. Paul's Bibliographies; New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press), pp. xi–xxxi. See also McKerrow 1927.Google Scholar

McKitterick, David. 2003. Print, Manuscript and the Search for Order, 1450–1830 (Lyell Lectures 2000; Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

McLaverty, James L.See Foxon 1991; Fleeman 2000.

McLeod, Randall. 1979. “A Technique of Headline Analysis, with Application to Shakespeares Sonnets, 1609,” Studies in Bibliography 32: 197–210.Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall. 1994. “fiatflux,” in Crisis in Editing: Texts of the English Renaissance, ed. McLeod, (Toronto Conferences on Editorial Problems, 1988; New York:AMS Press), pp. 61–172. Signed “Random Cloud.”Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall. 1999. “IMAGIC: a long discourse,” Studies in the Literary Imagination 32.1 (Spring): 190–215. Signed “Orlando F. Booke.”Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall. 2000. “Where Angels Fear to Read,” in Mar(k)ing the Text: The Presentation of Meaning on the Literary Page, ed. Bray, Joe, Handley, Miriam, and Henry, Anne C. (Aldershot:Ashgate), pp. 144–92.Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall. 2005. “Chronicling Holinshed's Chronicles: Textual Commentary,” in The Peaceable and Prosperous Regiment of Blessed Queene Elisabeth: A Facsimile from Holinshed's “Chronicles” (1587), ed. Clegg, Cyndia Susan (San Marino, Calif.:Huntington Library), pp.19–76.Google Scholar

McManaway, James G. 1938. “Thomas Dekker: Further Textual Notes,” The Library 4th series 19 (1938–39): 176–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 1979. “The Origins of Press Figures in English Printing, 1629–1671,” The Library 6th series 1: 307–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 1983. “Press Figures and Format,” Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 7: 109–19.Google Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 1984. “Paper-Quality Marks and the Oxford Bible Press 1682–1717,” The Library 6th series 6: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 1993a. “Sheet Numbers, ‘Constable's Miscellany’ and Irma,” Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 17: 33–43.Google Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 1993b. See McKitterick 1993a.

McMullin, B.J. 1994. “Further Observations on the Incidence and Interpretation of Press Figures,” in Writers, Books, and Trade: An Eighteenth-Century English Miscellany for William B. Todd, ed. Brack, OM, Jr. (New York:AMS Press), pp. 177–200.Google Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 2003. “Watermarks and the Determination of Format in British Paper, 1794–circa 1830,” Studies in Bibliography 56 (2003–4): 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, B.J. 2008. “Machine-Made Paper, Seam Marks, and Bibliographical Analysis,” The Library 7th series 9: 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, C.J. 1983. “Quotation Marks, National Compositorial Habits and False Imprints,” The Library 6th series 5: 359–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, William. See Wells 1987.

Moore, J.K. 1992. Primary Materials Relating to Copy and Print in English Books of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Oxford:Bibliographical Society).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1923. On Type Faces: Examples of the Use of Type for the Printing of Books (London:Medici Society and The Fleuron).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1926. Type Designs of the Past and Present (London:The Fleuron). Revised and enlarged, 1962, as On Type Designs, Past and Present: A Brief Introduction (London: Ernest Benn).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1930a. “First Principles of Typography,” Fleuron 7: 61–72. Reprinted, 1936, in book form with slight revisions (Cambridge: University Press). 2nd edn., 1967, with postscript (Cambridge: University Press).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1930b. Memorandum on a Proposal to Revise the Typography of “The Times” (London:The Times). Reprinted in Morison 1980, pp. 295–317.Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1944. The Typographic Arts: Past, Present & Future (Edinburgh:James Thin). Reprinted, 1959, in The Typographic Arts: Two Lectures (London: Theodore Brun, 1949; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1957. Aspects of Authority and Freedom in Relation to Graeco-Latin Script, Inscription, and Type: Sixth Century B.C. to Twentieth Century A.D. (Lyell Lectures 1957; 6 pamphlets; Cambridge:Privately printed as “Unrevised Proof” at the University Press). For revised and published version, see Morison 1972.Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1959. “Introduction,” in Burt 1959, pp. ix–xix.

Morison, Stanley. 1960. Talbot Baines Reed: Author, Bibliographer, Typefounder (Cambridge:Privately printed at the University Press).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1963a. “On the Classification of Typographical Variations,” in Type Specimen Facsimiles, ed. Dreyfus, John (London:Bowes & Bowes and Putnam), pp. ix–xxix. Reprinted, 1968, with slight revisions in Letter Forms, Typographical and Scriptorial (New York: Typophiles; London: Nattali & Maurice), pp.1–132.Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1963b. Morison and Kenneth Day, The Typographic Book 1450–1935 (London:Ernest Benn).Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1972. Politics and Script: Aspects of Authority and Freedom in the Development of Graeco-Latin Script from the Sixth Century B.C. to the Twentieth Century A.D., ed. Barker, Nicolas (Lyell Lectures 1957; Oxford:Clarendon Press). For preliminary version, see Morison 1957.Google Scholar

Morison, Stanley. 1980. Selected Essays on the History of Letter-Forms in Manuscript and Print, ed. McKitterick, David (2 vols.; Cambridge:University Press, 1980–81).Google Scholar

Morris, Ellen K., and Levin, Edward S.. 2000. The Art of Publishers' Bookbindings, 1815–1915 (Los Angeles:William Dailey Rare Books).Google Scholar

Mosser, Daniel W.See Needham 2000.

Moxon, Joseph. 1683. Mechanick Exercises: Or, the Doctrine of Handy-Works, Applied to the Art of Printing (London:Printed for Joseph Moxon), 11. New edition, 1958, 1962, ed. Herbert Davis and Harry Carter (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Mumby, Frank Arthur. 1930. Publishing and Bookselling: A History from the Earliest Times to the Present Day (London:Cape). 5th edn., 1974, expanded by Ian Norrie (London: Cape).Google Scholar

Myers, Robin. 1978. “William Blades's Debt to Henry Bradshaw and G. I. F. Tupper in His Caxton Studies: A Further Look at Unpublished Documents,” The Library 5th series 33: 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, Robin. 1988. See Roberts 1988.

Needham, Paul. 1979. Twelve Centuries of Bookbindings, 400–1600 (New York:Pierpont Morgan Library; London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1982. “Johann Gutenberg and the Catholicon Press,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 76: 395–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1985. “The Paper Supply of the Gutenberg Bible,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 79: 303–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1987. “ISTC as a Tool for Analytical Bibliography,” in Bibliography and the Study of 15th-Century Civilisation, ed. Hellinga, Lotte and Goldfinch, John (London:British Library), pp.39–54.Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1988. The Bradshaw Method: Henry Bradshaw's Contribution to Bibliography (Hanes Lecture; Chapel Hill, N.C.:Hanes Foundation, Rare Book Collection, University Library, University of North Carolina).Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1990. “Paul Schwenke and Gutenberg Scholarship: The German Contribution, 1885–1921,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 84: 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1993. “Aldus Manutius's Paper Stocks: The Evidence of Two Uncut Books,” Princeton University Library Chronicle 55 (1993–94): 287–307.Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1994a. “Allan H. Stevenson and the Bibliographical Uses of Paper,” Studies in Bibliography 47: 23–64.Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 1994b. “Res papirea: Sizes and Formats of the Late Medieval Book,” in Rationalisierung der Buchherstellung im Mittelalter und in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Rück, Peter and Boghardt, Martin (Marburg an der Lahn:Institut für Historische Hilfswissenschaften), pp.123–45.Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 2000. “Concepts of Paper Study,” in Puzzles in Paper: Concepts in Historical Watermarks, ed. Mosser, Daniel W., Saffle, Michael, and Sullivan, Ernest W. II (New Castle, Del.:Oak Knoll Press), pp.1–36.Google Scholar

Needham, Paul. 2006. “IDL, ILC, WILC: Gerard van Thienen's Contributions to the Study of Incunabula,” Quaerendo 36: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Needham, Paul. 2007. “The Paper of English Incunabula,” in Hellinga 2007, pp. 311–34.Google Scholar

Newell, Kenneth B. 1976. Pattern Poetry: A Historical Critique from the Alexandrian Greeks to Dylan Thomas (Boston:Marlborough House).Google Scholar

Norrie, Ian. 1974. See Mumby 1930.

O'Keeffe, Katherine O'Brien.See Ezell 1994.

Ovink, G.W. 1938. Legibility, Atmosphere-Value, and Forms of Printing Types (Leiden:A. W. Sijthoff).Google Scholar

Paisey, David. 1986. “Blind Printing in Early Continental Books,” in Book Production and Letters in the Western European Renaissance: Essays in Honour of Conor Fahy, ed. Lepschy, Anna Laura, Took, John, and Rhodes, Dennis E. (London:Modern Humanities Research Association), pp. 220–33.Google Scholar

Pantzer, Katharine F. 1986. “Introduction,” in A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad 1475–1640, rev. Pantzer (3 vols.; London:Bibliographical Society, 1976–91), 1 (1986), xix–xliii. See also Pollard 1926.Google Scholar

Panzer, G.W.F. 1793. Annales typographici (5 vols.; Nuremberg:J. E. Zeh, 1793–97).Google Scholar

Parkes, M.B. 1992. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West (Aldershot:Scolar Press).Google Scholar

Paterson, Donald G., and Tinker, Miles A.. 1929. “Studies of Typographical Factors Influencing Speed of Reading,” Journal of Applied Psychology 13 (1929) – 16 (1932): passim. (E.g., “II. Size of Type,” 13: 120–30; “III. Length of Line,” 13: 205–19; “X. Style of Type Face,” 16: 605–13.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paterson, Donald G., and Tinker, Miles A.. 1940. How to Make Type Readable: A Manual … Based on Twelve Years of Research Involving Speed of Reading Tests (New York:Harper).Google Scholar

Pearson, David. 1994. Provenance Research in Book History: A Handbook (London:British Library).Google Scholar

Perfect, Christopher, and Rookledge, Gordon. 1983. Rookledge's International Typefinder: The Essential Handbook of Typeface Recognition and Selection (London:Sarema Press). 2nd edn., 1990, rev. Phil Baines (Sarema Press).Google Scholar

Petrucci, Armando. 1986. La scrittura: ideologia e rappresentazione (Torino:G. Einaudi). Translated, 1993, by Linda Lappin as Public Lettering: Script, Power, and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Pickwoad, Nicholas. 1995. “The Interpretation of Bookbinding Structure: An Examination of Sixteenth-Century Bindings in the Ramey Collection in the Pierpont Morgan Library,” The Library 6th series 17: 209–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1904a. “Robert Proctor,” The Library 2nd series 5: 1–34. Reprinted in Proctor 1905, pp. ix–xl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1904b. See Bradshaw 1904.

Pollard, Alfred W. 1905. See Proctor 1905.

Pollard, Alfred W. 1906a. “Shakespeare in the Remainder Market,” The Academy, June 2, pp. 528–29.Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1906b. Pollard, and Greg, W.W., “Some Points in Bibliographical Descriptions,” Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 9 (1906–8): 31–52. Reprinted in Pollard 1976, pp.116–29.Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1908. “Introduction,” in Catalogue of Books Printed in the XVth Century Now in the British Museum (London:British Museum), 1, x–xxviii.Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1909. Shakespeare Folios and Quartos: A Study in the Bibliography of Shakespeare's Plays, 1594–1685 (London:Methuen).Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1916. “Our Twenty-First Birthday,” Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 13 (1913–15): 9–27.Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1920. See Bayfield 1920.

Pollard, Alfred W. 1923. “Elizabethan Spelling as a Literary and Bibliographical Clue,” The Library 4th ser. 4 (1923–24): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1926. “Preface,” in A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad 1475–1640, ed. Pollard, and Redgrave, G.R. (London:Bibliographical Society), pp. v–ix.Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1938. “My First Fifty Years,” in A Select Bibliography of the Writings of Alfred W. Pollard, ed. Henry Thomas, H.T. (Oxford:Printed for subscribers at the University Press), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Pollard, Alfred W. 1976. Alfred William Pollard: A Selection of His Essays, ed. Roper, Fred W. (The Great Bibliographers Series, no. 2; Metuchen, N. J.:Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar

Pollard, Graham. See Carter 1934.

Poole, William Frederick. 1867. [Comment on running-titles, in his introduction], in Edward Johnson, Wonder-Working Providence of Sion's Saviour in New England (Andover, Mass.:Warren F. Draper), p. xliii.Google Scholar

Povey, Kenneth. 1956. “On the Diagnosis of Half-Sheet Impositions,” The Library 5th series 11: 268–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Povey, Kenneth. 1959. “A Century of Press Figures,” The Library 5th series 14: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Povey, Kenneth. 1960. “The Optical Identification of First Formes,” Studies in Bibliography 13: 189–90.Google Scholar

Povey, Kenneth. 1965. “Working to Rule, 1600–1800: A Study of Pressmen's Practice,” The Library 5th series 20: 13–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Hereward T. 1937. “Towards a Scientific Method of Textual Criticism for the Elizabethan Drama,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 36: 151–67.Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert. 1898. An Index to the Early Printed Books in the British Museum … with Notes of Those in the Bodleian Library (London:Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1898–99). Supplemented, 1900–3 (London: Chiswick Press).Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert. 1905. Bibliographical Essays, ed. Pollard, A.W. (London:Chiswick Press).Google Scholar

Prothero, G.W. 1888. A Memoir of Henry Bradshaw (London:Kegan Paul, Trench).Google Scholar

Prown, Jules David. 1982. “Mind in Matter: An Introduction to Material Culture Theory and Method,” Winterthur Portfolio 17: 1–19. Reprinted, 2001, in Art as Evidence: Writings on Art and Material Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp.69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pyke, R.L. 1926. Report on the Legibility of Print (London:His Majesty's Stationery Office).Google Scholar

Redgrave, G.R.See Pollard 1926.

Reed, Talbot Baines. 1891. “Memoir of the Late William Blades,” in Blades 1891, pp. ix–xviii.Google Scholar

Renner, Paul. 1948. See Burke 2000.

Rhodes, Dennis E.See Paisey 1986.

Roberts, Julian. 1988. “The Bibliographical Society as a Band of Pioneers,” in Pioneers in Bibliography, ed. Myers, Robin and Harris, Michael (Winchester:St. Paul's Bibliographies), pp.86–100.Google Scholar

Roberts, Julian. 1992. “The Bibliographical Society, 1942–1992,” in Davison 1992, pp. 12–23.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, Catherine M. 2004. “The Use of Web Seam Evidence to Determine Format,” Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 28.3: 122–24.Google Scholar

Roethlein, Barbara Elizabeth. 1912. “The Relative Legibility of Different Faces of Printing Types,” Journal of Applied Psychology 24: 1–36.Google Scholar

Rogers, Shef. 1996. “How Many Ts Had Ezra Pound's Printer?,” Studies in Bibliography 49: 277–83.Google Scholar

Rookledge, Gordon. See Perfect 1983.

Roper, Fred W.See Pollard 1976.

Rosenblum, Joseph. See Greg 1998.

Rosenthal, Bernard M. 1997. The Rosenthal Collection of Printed Books with Manuscript Annotations (New Haven, Conn.:Yale University).Google Scholar

Rück, Peter. See Needham 1994b.

Sadleir, Michael. 1928. Trollope: A Bibliography (London:Constable).Google Scholar

Sadleir, Michael. 1930. The Evolution of Publishers' Binding Styles, 1770–1900 (Bibliographia, no. 1; London:Constable; New York: Richard R. Smith). Excerpted in Sadleir 1980, pp.69–80.Google Scholar

Sadleir, Michael. 1951. “Passages from the Autobiography of a Bibliomaniac,” in XIX Century Fiction: A Bibliographical Record Based on His Own Collection (2 vols.; London:Constable; Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), 1, xi–xxvi. Reprinted, 1962, as a pamphlet (Los Angeles: University of California Library). Excerpted in Sadleir 1980, pp. 87–96.Google Scholar

Sadleir, Michael. 1980. Michael Sadleir, 1888–1957, ed. Stokes, Roy (The Great Bibliographers Series, no. 5; Metuchen, N.J.:Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar

Saenger, Paul. 1996. “The Impact of the Early Printed Page on the History of Reading,” Bulletin du bibliophile 1996: 237–301.Google Scholar

Saffle, Michael. See Needham 2000.

Sandfords, E.C. 1888. “The Relative Legibility of the Small Letters,” American Journal of Psychology 1: 402–35.Google Scholar

Satchell, Thomas. 1920. “The Spelling of the First Folio,” Times Literary Supplement, June 3, p. 352.Google Scholar

Sayce, R.A. 1966. “Compositorial Practices and the Localization of Printed Books, 1530–1800,” The Library 5th series 31: 1–45. Reprinted, 1979, as a pamphlet with additons and corrections (Occasional Publications, no. 13; Oxford:Oxford Bibliographical Society).Google Scholar

Schmidgall, Gary. 2000. “1855: A Stop-Press Revision [in Leaves of Grass],” Walt Whitman Quarterly Review 18.1–2 (Summer–Fall): 73–75.Google Scholar

Schoonover, David E. 1987. “Techniques of Reproducing Watermarks: A Practical Introduction,” in Essays in Paper Analysis, ed. Spector, Stephen (Washington:Folger Shakespeare Library), pp.154–67.Google Scholar

Schwab, Richard N., Cahill, Thomas A., Kusko, Bruce H., and Wick, Daniel L.. 1983. “Cyclotron Analysis of the Ink [and paper] in the 42-Line Bible,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 77: 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwenke, Paul. 1896. Hans Weinreich und die Anfänge des Buchdrucks in Königsberg (Königsberg:Beyer).Google Scholar

Schwenke, Paul. 1900. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des ersten Buchdrucks [constituting Festschrift zur Gutenbergfeier] (Berlin:Königlichen Bibliothek).Google Scholar

Schwenke, Paul. 1923. Johannes Gutenbergs zweiundveierzigzeilige Bibel: Ergänzungsband zur Faksimile-Ausgabe [of 1913] (Leipzig:Insel-Verlag).Google Scholar

Scragg, D.G. 1974. A History of English Spelling (Manchester:University Press).Google Scholar

Shady, Raymond C.See Werstine 1984.

Shand, G.B.See Werstine 1984.

Shaw, David. 1972. “A Sampling Theory for Bibliographical Research,” The Library 5th series 27: 310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, David. 2006. See Harris (N.) 2006.

Shaw, Paul. See Bain (P.) 1999.

Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1975. “Detecting the Use of Stereotype Plates,” Editorial Quarterly 1.1: 2–3.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1979. “Register Measurement as a Method of Detecting Hidden Printings,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 73: 484–88.Google Scholar

Simmons, J.S.G. 1961. “The Leningrad Method of Watermark Reproduction,” The Book Collector 10: 329–30.Google Scholar

Simmons, J.S.G. 1967. See Stevenson 1967a.

Simon, Oliver. 1945. Introduction to Typography (London:Faber & Faber). 2nd edn., 1963, rev. David Bland (Faber & Faber).Google Scholar

Simpson, Percy. 1935. Proof-Reading in the Sixteenth, Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (London:Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Smith, Michael S.See Snyder 2003.

Smith, Steven Escar. 2000. “'The Eternal Verities Verified': Charlton Hinman and the Roots of Mechanical Collation,” Studies in Bibliography 53: 129–61.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven Escar. 2002. “ 'Armadillos of Invention': A Census of Mechanical Collators,” Studies in Bibliography 55: 133–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Henry L., and Smith, Michael S., eds. 2003. The English Short-Title Catalogue: Past, Present, Future (New York:AMS Press).

Sobry, Jean François. 1799. Discours sur l'art de l'imprimerie (Paris: n.p.). [Includes comments on experiment regarding type legibility by Jean Anisson in 1790s.] Translated by Paul Bloomfield, with an introduction by Daniel Berkeley Updike, in “A Translation of the Reports of [Théophile] Berlier & Sobry on Types of [Joseph Gaspard] Gillé fils,” Fleuron 6 (1928): 167–83 [see p. 181].Google Scholar

Sparrow, John. 1943. Lapidaria (8 vols.; Cambridge:University Press, 1943, 1951, 1954, 1958, 1965, 1969; Cambridge: Rampant Lions Press, 1975, 1981).Google Scholar

Sparrow, John. 1967. Line upon Line: An Epigraphical Anthology, with preface by Brooke Crutchley (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Sparrow, John. 1969. Visible Words: A Study of Inscriptions in and as Books and Works of Art (Sandars Lectures 1964; Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Spector, Stephen. See Schoonover 1987.

Steele, Oliver L. 1962a. “Half-Sheet Imposition of Eight-Leaf Quires in Formes of Thirty-Two and SIxty-Four Pages,” Studies in Bibliography 15: 274–78.Google Scholar

Steele, Oliver L. 1962b. “A Note on Half-Sheet Imposition in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Books,” Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 1962, pp. 545–47.Google Scholar

Steele, Oliver L. 1962c. “On the Imposition of the First Edition of Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter,” The Library 5th series 17: 250–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steele, Oliver L. 1963. “Evidence of Plate Damage as Applied to the First Impression of Ellen Glasgow's The Wheel of Life,” Studies in Bibliography 16: 223–31.Google Scholar

Steinberg, S.H. 1955. Five Hundred Years of Printing (Harmondsworth, Middlesex:Penguin Books). 2nd edn., 1961 (Penguin). 3rd edn., 1974 (Penguin). 4th edn., 1996, rev. John Trevitt (New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press; London: British Library).Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1948. “New Uses of Watermarks as Bibliographical Evidence,” Studies in Bibliography 1 (1948–49): 151–82.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1951. “Watermarks Are Twins,” Studies in Bibliography 4 (1951–52): 57–91 (with addendum on p.235).Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1954. “Chain-Indentations in Paper as Evidence,” Studies in Bibliography 6: 181–95.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1961a. Observations on Paper as Evidence (University of Kansas Publications, Library Series, no. 11; Lawrence:University of Kansas Libraries).Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1961b. “Paper,” in Catalogue of Botanical Books in the Collection of Rachel McMasters Miller Hunt (Pittsburgh:Hunt Botanical Library), 11 (1961), clxxvi–clxxx.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1962a. “Paper as Bibliographical Evidence,” The Library 5th series 17: 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1962b. “Paper Evidence and the Missale speciale,” Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 1962, pp. 94–105.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1967a. “Beta-Radiography and Paper Research,” in VII International Congress of Paper Historians, Communications, ed. Simmons, J.S.G., pp. 159–68.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Allan H. 1967b. The Problem of the Missale speciale (London:Bibliographical Society). Also published in a “Special American Issue” (Pittsburgh: Thomas C. Pears III).Google Scholar

Stoddard, Roger E. 1985. Marks in Books, Illustrated and Explained (Cambridge, Mass.:Houghton Library).Google Scholar

Stoddard, Roger E. 2000. “Looking at Marks in Books,” Gazette of the Grolier Club 51: 27–47.Google Scholar

Stokes, Roy. 1980. See Sadleir 1980.

Stokes, Roy. 1984. “Commentary,” in Bradshaw 1984, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar

Suarez, Michael F. 2002. See McKenzie 2002.

Suarez, Michael F. 2003. “Historiographical Problems and Possibilities in Book History and National Histories of the Book,” Studies in Bibliography 56 (2003–4): 141–70.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Ernest W., II. See Needham 2000.

Swann, Cal. 1991. Language and Typography (London:Lund Humphries).Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, Samuel A. 1937. [Comment on Price 1937], Shakespeare Association Bulletin 12 (July): 191.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1966a. “The Identification of Type Faces in Bibliographical Description,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 60: 185–202. Reprinted, 1967, with a postscript in Journal of Typographic Research 1: 427–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1966b. “Press Figures in America: Some Preliminary Observations,” Studies in Bibliography 19: 123–60.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1971. “The Bibliographical Description of Paper,” Studies in Bibliography 24: 27–67. Reprinted in Tanselle 1979, pp.203–43.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1974. “Bibliography and Science,” Studies in Bibliography 27: 55–89. Reprinted in Tanselle 1979, pp.1–36.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1979. Selected Studies in Bibliography (Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia for the Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1981a. “Analytical Bibliography and Renaissance Printing History,” Printing History 3.1: 24–33. Reprinted as “Analytical Bibliography and Printing History,” in Tanselle 1998a, pp.291–306.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1981b. The History of Books as a Field of Study (Hanes Lecture; Chapel Hill:Hanes Foundation, Rare Book Collection, Academic Affairs Library, University of North Carolina). Reprinted in Tanselle 1998a, pp.41–55.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1982. “Physical Bibliography in the Twentieth Century,” in Books, Manuscripts, and the History of Medicine: Essays on the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Osler Library, ed. Teigen, Philip M. (New York:Science History Publications), pp.55–79.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1983. “Introduction,” in Books and Society in History, ed. Carpenter, Kenneth E. (New York:R.R. Bowker), pp. xvii–xxiii.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1984. “The Evolving Role of Bibliography, 1884–1984,” in Books and Prints, Past and Future: Papers Presented at The Grolier Club Centennial Convocation, 26–28 April 1984 (New York:Grolier Club), pp. 15–31.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1985. “Title-Page Transcription and Signature Collation Reconsidered,” Studies in Bibliography 38: 45–81.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1986. “Historicism and Critical Editing,” Studies in Bibliography 39: 1–46. Reprinted in Tanselle 2005b, pp.109–54.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1987. “A Sample Bibliographical Description with Commentary,” Studies in Bibliography 40: 1–30.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1988. “Bibliographical History as a Field of Study,” Studies in Bibliography 41: 33–63.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1989a. A Rationale of Textual Criticism (Rosenbach Lectures 1987; Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1989b. “Reproductions and Scholarship,” Studies in Bibliography 42: 25–54. Reprinted in Tanselle 1998a, pp.59–88.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1991a. [On the signatures in Clarel], in Herman Melville, Clarel, ed. Hayford, Harrisonet al. (Northwestern-Newberry Edition, vol. 12; Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press; Chicago: The Newberry Library), pp.678–79.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1991b. “Textual Criticism and Literary Sociology,” Studies in Bibliography 44: 83–143. Reprinted in Tanselle 2005b, pp.155–215.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1992a. A Description of Descriptive Bibliography (Engelhard Lecture on the Book; Washington:Library of Congress). Also printed in Studies in Bibliography 45 (1992): 1–30. Reprinted in Tanselle 1998a, pp. 127–56.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1992b. “Issues in Bibliographical Studies since 1942,” in Davison 1992, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1993a. “Enumerative Bibliography and the Physical Book,” in Scholarly Publishing in Canada and Canadian Bibliography, ed. Aubin, Paulet al. (Canadian Issues, vol. 15; Montréal:Association for Canadian Studies), pp. 145–59. Reprinted in Tanselle 1998a, pp.186–99.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1993b. “The Life and Work of Fredson Bowers,” Studies in Bibliography 46: 1–154. Reprinted, 1993, as a separate volume (Charlottesville:Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1994. “Introduction,” in Fredson Bowers, Principles of Bibliographical Description (1994 printing; Winchester:St. Paul's Bibliographies; New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press), pp. v–xiv. See also Bowers 1949.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1995a. “Printing History and Other History,” Studies in Bibliography 48: 269–89. Reprinted in Tanselle 1998a, pp.307–27.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1995b. “The Varieties of Scholarly Editing,” in Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research, ed. D.C. Greetham (New York:Modern Language Association of America), pp. 9–32.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1997. “A History of Studies in Bibliography: The First Fifty Volumes,” Studies in Bibliography 50: 125–70. Reprinted in Vander Meulen 1998, pp. 125–70.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1998a. Literature and Artifacts (Charlottesville:Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1998b. “A Rationale of Collecting,” Studies in Bibliography 51: 1–25. Reprinted, 1999, without footnotes and with a few revisions, in Raritan 19.1 (Summer): 23–50.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1999. “The Treatment of Typesetting and Presswork in Bibliographical Description,” Studies in Bibliography 52: 1–57.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2000. “The Concept of Format,” Studies in Bibliography 53: 67–115.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2001. “Textual Criticism at the Millennium,” Studies in Bibliography 54: 1–80. Reprinted in Tanselle 2005b, pp.277–356.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2002a. Introduction to Bibliography: Seminar Syllabus (5th edn.; Charlottesville:Book Arts Press, University of Virginia Rare Book School). Also available on the internet at www.rarebookschool.org/tanselle/.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2002b. Introduction to Scholarly Editing: Seminar Syllabus (2nd edn.; Charlottesville:Book Arts Press, University of Virginia Rare Book School). Also available on the internet at www.rarebookschool.org/tanselle/.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2004. “The Work of D. F. McKenzie,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 98: 511–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2005a. “The Textual Criticism of Visual and Aural Works,” Studies in Bibliography 57 (2005–6): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. 2005b. Textual Criticism since Greg: A Chronicle, 1950–2000 (Charlottesville:Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary. See Wells 1987; Weiss 2007.

Teigen, Philip M.See Tanselle 1982.

Thomas, Henry. See Pollard 1938.

Thomson, Ellen Mazur. 2006. “The Graphic Forms Lectures,” Printing History 25.1: 42–55.Google Scholar

Tinker, Miles A. 1928. “The Relative Legibility of the Letters, the Digits, and Certain Mathematical Signs,” Journal of General Psychology 1: 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinker, Miles A. 1929. See Paterson 1929.

Tinker, Miles A. 1932. “The Influence of the Form of Type on the Perception of Words,” Journal of Applied Psychology 16: 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinker, Miles A. 1940. See Paterson 1940.

Todd, William B. 1949. “Procedures for Determining the Identity and Order of Certain Eighteenth-Century Editions” (University of Chicago Ph.D. dissertation).Google Scholar

Todd, William B. 1950. “Observations on the Incidence and Interpretation of Press Figures,” Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950–51): 171–205.Google Scholar

Todd, William B. 1951. “Bibliography and the Editorial Problem in the Eighteenth Century,” Studies in Bibliography 4 (1951–52): 41–55.Google Scholar

Todd, William B. 1952. “Concurrent Printing: An Analysis of Dodsley's Collection of Poems by Several Hands,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 46: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todd, William B. 1956. “Patterns in Press Figures: A Study of Lyttleton's Dialogues of the Dead,” Studies in Bibliography 8: 230–35.Google Scholar

Todd, William B. 1958. New Adventures among Old Books: An Essay in Eighteenth-Century Bibliography (University of Kansas Publications, Library Series, no. 4; Lawrence:University of Kansas Libraries).Google Scholar

Todd, William B. 1998a. “Some Early Encounters with Fredson Bowers,” in Vander Meulen 1998, pp. 213–24.Google Scholar

Todd, William B. 1998b. Todd and Ann Bowden, Sir Walter Scott: A Bibliographical History, 1796–1832 (New Castle, Del.:Oak Knoll Press).Google Scholar

Tomlinson, William, and Masters, Richard. 1996. Bookcloth 1823–1980: A Study of Early Use and the Rise of Manufacture, Winterbottom's Dominance of the Trade in Britain and America, Production Methods and Costs and the Identification of Qualities and Designs (Stockport, Cheshire:D. Tomlinson).Google Scholar

Took, John. See Paisey 1986.

Trevitt, John. 1996. See Steinberg 1955.

Tribble, Evelyn B. 1993. Margins and Marginality: The Printed Page in Early Modern England (Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia).Google Scholar

Tschichold, Jan. 1946. See Burke 2000.

Turner, Robert K., Jr. 1962. “Printing Methods and Textual Problems in A Midsummer Night's Dream Q1,” Studies in Bibliography 15: 33–55.Google Scholar

Turner, Robert K., Jr. 1965. “The Printing of A King and No King,” Studies in Bibliography 18: 255–61.Google Scholar

Turner, Robert K., Jr. 1966. “Reappearing Types as Bibliographical Evidence,” Studies in Bibliography 19: 198–209.Google Scholar

Turner, Robert K., Jr. 1967. “The Text of Heywood's The Fair Maid of the West,” The Library 5th series 22: 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Robert K., Jr. 1974. “The Printers and the Beaumont and Fletcher Folio of 1647: Section 1 (Thomas Warren's),” Studies in Bibliography 27: 137–56.Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1970a. Lithography, 1800–1850: The Techniques of Drawing on Stone in England and France and Their Application in Works of Topography (London:Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1970b. Printing 1770–1970: An Illustrated History of Its Development and Uses in England (London:Eyre & Spottiswoode).Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1979. “A Schema for the Study of Graphic Language,” in Kolers 1979, pp. 117–50.Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1986. “Articulating Graphic Language: A Historical Perspective,” in Wrolstad 1986, pp. 188–251.Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1990. Early Lithographed Books: A Study of the Design and Production of Improper Books in the Age of the Handpress (London:Farrand Press and the Private Libraries Association).Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1998a. The British Library Guide to Printing: History and Techniques (London:British Library).Google Scholar

Twyman, Michael. 1998b. “Nicolete Gray: A Personal View of Her Contribution to the Study of Letterforms,” Typography Papers 3: 87–102.Google Scholar

Updike, Daniel Berkeley. 1928. See Sobry 1799.

Vander Meulen, David L. 1981. “A Descriptive Bibliography of Alexander Pope's Dunciad, 1728–1751” (University of Wisconsin Ph.D. dissertation).Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1982. “The Printing of Pope's Dunciad, 1728,” Studies in Bibliography 35: 271–85.Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1984. “The Identification of Paper without Watermarks: The Example of Pope's Dunciad,” Studies in Bibliography 37: 58–81.Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1988a. “The Low-Tech Analysis of Early Paper,” Literary Research 13: 89–94.Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1988b. Where Angels Fear to Tread: Descriptive Bibliography and Alexander Pope (Engelhard Lecture on the Book; Washington:Library of Congress).Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1989. “The Dunciad in Four Books and the Bibliography of Pope,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 83: 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1991. Pope's “Dunciad” of 1728: A History and Facsimile (Charlottesville:Published for the Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia and the New York Public Library by the University Press of Virginia).Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 1997. “A History of the Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia: The First Fifty Years,” Studies in Bibliography 50: 1–81. Reprinted in Vander Meulen 1998, pp.1–81.Google Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 2003. “How to Read Book History,” Studies in Bibliography 56 (2003–4): 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vander Meulen, David L. 2008. “Thoughts on the Future of Bibliographical Analysis,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 46: 17–34.Google Scholar

Meulen, Vander, L, David, ed. 1998. The Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia: The First Fifty Years (Charlottesville:Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia).

Vivet, Jean-Pierre.See Martin 1982.

Walker, Alice. 1953. Textual Problems of the First Folio (Cambridge:University Press).Google Scholar

Walker, Alice. 1954. “The Folio Text of 1 Henry IV,” Studies in Bibliography 6: 45–59.Google Scholar

Walker, Alice. 1955. “Compositor Determination and Other Problems in Shakespearian Texts,” Studies in Bibliography 7: 3–15.Google Scholar

Walker, Alice. 1956. “Some Editorial Principles (with Special Reference to Henry V),” Studies in Bibliography 8: 95–111.Google Scholar

Wallau, Heinrich. 1888. “Über Puncturen in alten Drucken,” Centralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 5: 91–93.Google Scholar

Wallau, Heinrich. 1900. “Die zweifarbigen Initialen der Psalterdrucke von Johann Fust und Peter Schöffer,” in Festschrift zum fünfhundertjährigen Geburstage von Johann Gutenberg, ed. Hartwig, Otto (Leipzig:Harrassowitz), pp. 261–304.Google Scholar

Waller, Robert H.W. 1980. “Graphic Aspects of Complex Texts: Typography as Macro-Punctuation,” in Kolers 1980, pp. 241–53.Google Scholar

Warde, Beatrice. 1955. The Crystal Goblet: Sixteen Essays on Typography, ed. Jacob, Henry (London:Sylvan Press).Google Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 1988. “Reproductions of Early Dramatic Texts as a Source of Bibliographical Evidence,” Text 4: 237–68.Google Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 1990. “Font Analysis as a Bibliographical Method: The Elizabethan Play-Quarto Printers and Compositors,” Studies in Bibliography 43: 95–164.Google Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 1991. “Bibliographical Methods for Identifying Unknown Printers in Elizabethan/Jacobean Books,” Studies in Bibliography 44: 183–228.Google Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 1992. “Shared Printing, Printer's Copy, and the Text(s) of Gascoigne's A Hundreth Sundrie Flowres,” Studies in Bibliography 45: 71–104.Google Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 1999a. “A ‘Fill-In’ Job: The Textual Crux and Interrupted Printing in Thomas Middleton's The Triumph of Honour and Virtue (1622),” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 93: 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 1999b. “Watermark Evidence and Inference: New Style Dates of Edmund Spenser's Complaints and Daphnaida,” Studies in Bibliography 52: 129–54.Google Scholar

Weiss, Adrian. 2007. “Casting Compositors, Foul Cases, and Skeletons: Printing in Middleton's Age,” in Thomas Middleton and Early Modern Textual Culture: A Companion to the Collected Works, ed. Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (Oxford:Clarendon Press), pp. 195–225 (cf. “Running-Title Movements and Printing Method,” pp.484–85).Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley, and Taylor, Gary, with Jowett, John and Montgomery, William. 1987. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford:Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar