References

Richard A. Richards

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107588233.011

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2016

Richard A. Richards

Show author details

Richard A. Richards: Affiliation:
University of Alabama

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Biological Classification
A Philosophical Introduction
, pp. 287 - 298

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588233.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agapow, P. M., Bininda-Edmunds, O. R. P., Crandall, K. A., Gittleman, J. L., Mace, G. M., Marshall, J. C., and Purvis, A.. 2004. “The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies.” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79(2): 161–179.Google Scholar

Amundson, R. 2005. The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Andam, C. Williams, P. D., and Gogarten, J. P.. 2010. “Natural Taxonomy in Light of Horizontal Gene Transfer.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 589–602.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vols. I and II, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Atran, S. 1999. “Itzaj Maya Folkbiological Taxonomy,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. L. and Atran, S., 119–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bacon, F. 1960. The New Organon and Related Writings, ed. Anderson, F. H.. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. 1987. “Aristotle’s Use of Division and Differentiae,” in Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., 69–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bapteste, E., and Burian, R.. 2010. “On the Need for Integrative Phylogenomics, and Some Steps toward Its Creation.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 711–736.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1995. “Life and Work,” in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J., 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baum, D. A., and Smith, S. D.. 2012. Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts & Company.Google Scholar

Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D., and Donovan, S. S. S.. 2005. “The Tree-Thinking Challenge.” Science, 310(5750): 979–980.Google Scholar

Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, B.. 1999. “How a Folkbotanical System Can Be Both Natural and Comprehensive: One Maya Indian’s View of the Plant World,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. L. and Atran, S., 71–89. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bird, A., and Tobin, E.. 2008. “Natural Kinds,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/natural-kinds/Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. 2002. “Metaphysics,” in The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, ed. Bunnin, N. and Tsui-James, E. P., 61–89. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. 1996. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of De Anima. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bock, W., and Wahlert, G. v.. 1965. “Adaptation and the Form-Function Complex.” Evolution, 19(3): 269–299.Google Scholar

Bock, W., and Wahlert, G. v.. 1981. “Functional-Adaptive Analysis in Evolutionary Classification.” American Zoologist, 21: 5–20.Google Scholar

Bouchard, F. 2013. “What Is a Symbiotic Individual and How Do You Measure Its Fitness?” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 243–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1999. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa,” in Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., 141–185. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brogaard, B. 2004. “Species as Individuals.” Biology and Philosophy, 19: 223–242.Google Scholar

Brown, S. F. 1999. “Realism versus Nominalism,” in The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, ed. Popkin, R.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bulmer, R. N. H. 1967. “Why Is the Cassowary Not a Bird? A Problem of Zoological Taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea Highlands.” Man, 2: 5–25.Google Scholar

Capone, N. C., Haynes, W. O., and Grohne-Riley, K.. 2010. “Early Semantic Development: The Developing Lexicon,” in Language Development: Foundations, Processes, and Clinical Applications, ed. Shulman, B. B. and Capone, N. C.. Burlington, MA: Bartlett.Google Scholar

Clarke, E., and Okasha, S., , S. 2013. “Species and Organisms: What Are the Problems?” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 197–223. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cracraft, J. 1981. “The Use of Functional and Adaptive Criteria in Phylogenetic Systematics.” American Zoologist, 21: 21–36.Google Scholar

Cracraft, J. 2000. “Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: A Systematic Debate with Consequences,” in Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, ed. Wheeler, Q. D, and Meier, R., 3–14. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, A., Boschetti, C., Tunnacliffe, A., and Micklem, G.. 2015. “Expression of Multiple Horizontally Acquired Genes Is a Hallmark of Both Vertebrate and Invertebrate Genomes.” Genome Biology, 16: 50, DOI 10.1186/s13059- 015-0607-3.Google Scholar

Dagan, T., Artzy-Randrup, Y., and Martin, W., 2008. “Modular Networks and Cumulative Impact of Lateral Transfer in Prokaryote Genome Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105(29): 10039–10044.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species, at The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online. Retrieved from: http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=text&itemID=F339.1&keywords=cirripedia&pageseq=1 Google Scholar

Darwin, F. 1887. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Depew, D., and Weber, B. H. 1995. Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, K. 1999. “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category,” in Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., 49–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, K. 2005. “Ernst Mayr and the Modern Concept of Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102(1): 6600–6607.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, K., and Cantino, P. D.. 2001. “Taxon Names, not Taxa Are Defined.” Taxon, 50(3): 821–824.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J.. 1992. “Phylogenetic Taxonomy.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23: 449–480.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J.. 1994. “Toward a Phylogenetic System of Biological Nomenclature.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 27–31.Google Scholar

Devitt, M. 2008. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science, 75(3): 344–382.Google Scholar

Diamond, J., and Bishop, K. D., 1999. “Ethno-ornithology and the Ketengban People, Indonesian New Guinea,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, L. and Atran, S.. 17–45. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. 1964. “Biology, Molecular and Organismic.” American Zoologist, 4(4): 443–452.Google Scholar

Doolittle, W. F. 2010. “The Attempt on the Life of the Tree of Life: Science, Philosophy and Politics.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 455–473.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ebbesen, S. 1990a. “Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator,” in Aristotle Transformed, ed. Sorabji, R., 373–391. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Ebbeson, S. 1990b. “Porphyry’s Legacy to Logic: A Reconstruction,” in Aristotle Transformed, ed. Sorabji, R., 141–179. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Eddy, J. H. Jr. 1994. “Buffon’s Histoire Naturelle: History? A Critique of Recent Interpretations.” ISIS, 85(40): 644–661.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J.. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Ellstrand, N. C., Whitkus, R., and Rieseberg, L. H.. 1996. “Distribution of Spontaneous Plant Hybrid.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 93: 5090–5093.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. 1992. “Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution,” in The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M.. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. 1998. “Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism.” Philosophy of Science, 65: 103–120.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. 2010. “Microbiology and the Species Problem.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 553–568.Google Scholar

Eriksson, G. 1983. “Linnaeus the Botanist,” in Linnaeus the Man and His Work, ed. Frangsmyr, T.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2005. “Commentators on Aristotle,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/aristotle-commentators/Google Scholar

Felsenstein, J. 1982. “Numerical Methods for Inferring Evolutionary Trees.” Quarterly Review of Biology, 57(4): 379–404.Google Scholar

Felsenstein, J. 1983. “Methods for Inferring Phylogenies.” in Numerical Taxonomy, ed. Felstein, Joseph. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Franklin-Hall, L. R. 2010. “Trashing Life’s Tree.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 689–709.Google Scholar

Futuyama, D. 1979. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. 1997. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. 1999. “Squaring the Circle, Natural Kinds with Historical Essences,” in Species, New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., 209–228. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Haber, M. H. 2012. “Multilevel Lineages and Multidimensional Trees: The Levels of Lineage and Phylogeny Reconstruction.” Philosophy of Science, 79: 609–623.Google Scholar

Haber, M. H. 2013. “Colonies Are Individuals,” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 195–217. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Haber, M. H., and Hamilton, A.. 2005. “Coherence, Consistency, and Cohesion: Clade selection in Okasha and Beyond.” Philosophy of Science, 72: 1026–1040.Google Scholar

Hanson, N. R. 1969. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics, trans. Davis, D. D. and Zangerl, R.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Hey, J. 2001. Genes, Categories and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huerta-Sánchez, E., Jin, X., Asan, , , Z. Bianba, Peter, B. M., Vinchenbosch, N., Liang, Y., Yi, X., He, M., Somel, M., Ni, P., Wang, B., Ou, X., Huasang, J. Luosang, Z. Cuo, X. P., Kui Li, G. Gao, Y. Yin, W. Wang, Zhang, X., Xu, X., Yang, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Wang, J., and Nielsen, R.. 2014. “Altitude Adaptations in Tibetans Caused by Introgression of Denisovan-like DNA.” Nature, 512: 194–197.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1989. The Metaphysics of Evolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1990. Science as Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1992. “A Matter of Individuality,” in The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 293–316. Cambridge, MA: Bradford BooksGoogle Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1998. “Introduction to Part V,” in The Philosophy of Biology, ed. Hull, D. L. and Ruse, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1999. “The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper.” Biology and Philosophy, 14: 481–504.Google Scholar

Hunn, E. 1982. “The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification.” American Anthropologist, 84(4): 830–847.Google Scholar

Huxley, J. S. 1940. “Introductory: Towards the New Systematics,” in The New Systematics, ed. Huxley, Julian, 1–46. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, A., and Walsh, J. J. (1983) Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Jablonski, D. 1997. “Body Size Evolution in Cretaceous Molluscs and the Status of Cope’s Rule.” Nature, 385: 250–252.Google Scholar

Jablonsky, D. 2008. “Species Selection: Theory and Data.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 39: 501–524.Google Scholar

Jones, W. T. 1969. The Medieval Mind. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Kant, I, 1965. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N. K.. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Khalidi, M. Ali 2013. Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1992. “Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 317–341. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar

Kitts, D. R., and Kitts, D. J.. 1979. “Biological Species as Natural Kinds.” Philosophy of Science, 46(4): 613–622.Google Scholar

Klima, G. 2003. “Natures: The Problem of Universals.” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. McGrade, A. S., 196–206. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

LaPorte, J. 2004. Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Larson, J. L. 1968. “The Species Concept of Linnaeus.” Isis, 59(3): 291–299.Google Scholar

Larson, J. L. 1971. Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von Linne. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lecointre, G., and Guyader, H. L.. 2006. The Tree of Life: A Phylogenetic Classification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding, transl. and ed. Remnant, P. and Bennett, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. 1980. “Aristotle on Genera, Species and the More and the Less.” Journal of the History of Biology, 13: 321–346.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. 1987. “Kinds, Forms of Kinds and the More and Less in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., 339–359. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. 2006. “Aristotle’s Biology,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N.. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/aristotle-biology/Google Scholar

Lindroth, S. 1983. “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” in Linnaeus: The Man and His Work, ed. Frangsmyr, T., 1–62. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Linnaeus, C. 1964. Systema Naturae, Facsimile of the First Edition, ed. Engel-Ledeboer, M. J. S. and Engel, H.. Nieuwkoop, Netherlands: B. De Graaf.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. 1968. “Buffon and the Problem of Species,” in Forerunners of Darwin, 84–113. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

MacLauren, J., and Sterelny, K.. 2008. What Is Biodiversity? The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Maddison, D. R., Schulz, K-S., and Maddison, W. P. 2007. “The Tree of Life Web Project.” Zootaxa, 1668: 19–40.Google Scholar

Madigan, A. S. J. 1994. “Alexander on Aristotle’s Species and Genera as Principles,” in Aristotle in Late Antiquity, ed. Schrenk, L., 76–91. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Magnus, P. D. 2012. Scientific Inquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Maier, D. S. 2013. What’s So Good about Biodiversity. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Mallet, J. 2005. “Hybridization as an Invasion of the Genome.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(5): 229–237.Google Scholar

Mallet, J. 2013. “Darwin and Species,” in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought, ed. Ruse, Michael, 109–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marenbon, J. 2005. “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/boethius/Google Scholar

Markman, E. 1989, Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marrone, S. P. 2003. “Medieval Philosophy in Context,” in Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. McGrade, A. S., 10–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mason, A. S. 2010. Plato. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Mayden, R. L. 1997. “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem,” in Species: the Units of Biodiversity, ed. Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., and Wilson, M. R., 381–424. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E., and Ashlock, P. D.. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

McFadden, B. 1986. “Fossil Horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus” Scaling, Cope’s Law and the Evolution of Body Size.” Paleobiology, 12(4): 355–369.Google Scholar

McOuat, G. R. 1996. “Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th Century Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 27(4): 473–519.Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., and Atran, S.. 1999. “Introduction,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. and Atran, S., 1–15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1858. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1882. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 8th ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Minelli, A. 1993. Biological Systematics. London; Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Mishler, B. D., and Brandon, R.. 1987. “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept.” Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397–414.Google Scholar

Mishler, B. D., and Donoghue, M.. 1992. “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 121–137. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. J., and Pitts, W. B. 2008. “Evolution Without Species: The Case of Mosaic Bacteriophages.” British Journal of Philosophical Science, 59: 745–765.Google Scholar

Nelson, K. 1973. “Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38: 1–135.Google Scholar

Nelson, G., and Platnick, N. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Niklas, K. J. 1997. The Evolutionary Biology of Plants. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Normore, C. G. 1990. “Ockham on Mental Language,” in Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed. Smith, J. C., 53–70. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, B. W. 2006. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Okasha, S. 2006. Species Selection, Clade Selection and Macroevolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Malley, M. 2010. “Ernst Mayr, the Tree of Life and Philosophy of Biology.” Biology and Philosophy, 25: 529–552.Google Scholar

Ospovat, D. 1981. The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology and Natural Selection 1838–1859. Cambridge: Cambridge University of Press.Google Scholar

Panchen, A. L. 1992. Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paterson, H. E. H. 1993. Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, F. E. 1967. Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Pietsch, T. W. 2012. Trees of Life: A Visual History of Evolution. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1961. The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pradeu, T. 2013. “Immunity and the Emergence of Individuality,” in From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, ed. Bouchard, F. and Huneman, P., 77–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” The Journal of Philosophy, 70(19): 699–711.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ray, J. 1735. The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation, 10th ed. London: William Innys and Richard Manby.Google Scholar

Richards, R. A. 2003. “Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference.” Philosophy of Science, 70: 264–279.Google Scholar

Richards, R. A. 2005. “Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation: The Other Side of Error Theory.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 1(2): 270–292.Google Scholar

Richards, R. A. 2008. “Functional Analysis and Character Transformation,” in Form and Function in Developmental Evolution, ed. Laubichler, M. D. and Maienshein, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, R. A. 2010. The Species Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. 1987. “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals or What?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38(2): 225–242.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. 1999. The Darwinian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Slater, M. 2013. Are Species Real: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Species. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sloan, P. R. 1976. “The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy.” Isis, 67(3): 356–375.Google Scholar

Sloan, P. R. 1979. “Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species.” The British Journal for the History of Science, 12(2): 109–153.Google Scholar

Sloan, P. R. 1985. “From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals.” Histoire du Concept D’Espece dans Les Sciences de la Vie. Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.Google Scholar

Sloan, P. R. 2003. “Reflections on the Species Problem,” in The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, ed. Auxier, R. and Hahn, L. E.. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar

Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sober, E. 2000. Philosophy of Biology, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 1990. “The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle,” in Aristotle Transformed, ed. Sorabji, R., 1–30. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Stafleu, F. A. 1971. Linnaeus and the Linnaeans. Utrecht, the Netherlands: A. Oosthooek’s Uitgeversmaatschappij N.V.Google Scholar

Stamos, D. 2003. The Species Problem. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Stamos, D. 2007. Darwin and the Nature of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Stauffer, R. C. 1975. Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, P. F. 1983. “Augustin Augier’s “Arbre Botanique” (1801), A Remarkably Early Botanical Representation of the Natural System.” Taxon, 32(2): 203–211.Google Scholar

Stevens, P. F. 1994. The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, Nature and the Natural System. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Stott, R. 2003. Darwin and the Barnacle. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Thompson, A. 1995. “The Debate on Universals before Peter Abelard.” The Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(3): 409–429.Google Scholar

Van Valen, L. 1992. “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks,” in The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, ed. Ereshefsky, M., 69–77. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar

Velasco, J. 2012. “The Future of Systematics: Tree Thinking Without the Tree.” Philosophy of Science, 79(5): 624–636.Google Scholar

Waxman, S. R. 1999. “The Dubbing Ceremony Revisited: Object Naming and Categorization in Infancy and Early Childhood,” in Folkbiology, ed. Medin, D. L. and Atran, S., 233–284. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P., and Osmólska, H.. 2004. The Dinosauria, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wheeler, W. 2012. Systematics: A Course of Lectures. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Whewell, W. 1989. Theory of Scientific Method, ed. Butts, R. E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wiley, E. O., and Lieberman, B. S., 2011. Phylogenetics: The Theory of Phylogenetic Systematics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. 2009. Species: A History of the Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. S., and Ebach, M. C., 2014. The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. 1999. The Diversity of Life. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. 2000. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Winsor, M. P. 1969. “Barnacle Larvae in the Nineteenth Century: A Case Study in Taxonomic Theory.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 24: 294–309.Google Scholar

Winsor, M. P. 2001. “Cain on Linnaeus: The Scientist-Historian as Unanalysed Entity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Science, 32(2): 239–254.Google Scholar

Winsor, M. P. 2003. “Non-essentialist Methods in pre-Darwinian Taxonomy.” Biology and Philosophy, 18: 387–400.Google Scholar

Winsor, M. P. 2006. “The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory.” History and Philosophy of Life Sciences, 28: 149–174.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive