Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-5pczc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:07:17.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Radiological assessment of the axilla

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Michael J. Michell
Affiliation:
King's College Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. This chapter details why preoperative staging of the axilla is so important, the different imaging modalities we can employ, the role of preoperative ultrasound-guided biopsy, and highlights possible future developments.

The importance of axillary staging

Staging the axilla for nodal metastases is a crucial step in the management of breast cancer, providing diagnostic information and guiding subsequent management. Traditionally, axillary lymph node dissection has been performed at the time of breast cancer surgery and provides the most accurate information. Clearing the axilla of lymph nodes can be associated with significant morbidity with the development of lymphedema. Patients who have axillary lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis derive benefit from having the axilla cleared, reducing the risk of local and regional recurrence. In addition, most surgeons feel that providing good local control translates into improved survival, although the evidence for a survival benefit is less clear cut.

More recently less invasive surgical methods have been introduced such as lymph node sampling and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB). These procedures aim to provide staging information without the risks associated with complete axillary dissection, and are ideal for patients who are ultimately found to be node negative. The disadvantage is that when a patient is found to have lymph node involvement, a second procedure such as an axillary clearance or radiotherapy is required to adequately treat the axilla.

Type
Chapter
Information
Breast Cancer , pp. 169 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duff, M, Hill, AD, McGreal, G, et al. Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivens, D, Hoe, AL, Podd, TJ, et al. Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection. Brit J Surg 1992; 77: 760–4.Google Scholar
Mansfield, L, Sosa, I, Dionello, R, et al. Current management of the axilla in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: a nationwide survey of United Kingdom breast surgeons. Int Sem Surg Oncol 2007; 4: 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, , Wechsler, RJ, Kurtz, AB, et al. CT-pathologic correlation of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomog 1991; 15: 440–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uematsu, T, Sano, M, Homma, K. In vitro high-resolution helical CT of small axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: Correlation of CT and histology. Am J Radiol 2001; 176: 1069–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Mussurakis, S, Buckley, DL, Horsman, A. Prediction of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 203: 317–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, MJ, Skinner, KA, Lomis, TJ. Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma. World J Surg 2001; 25: 767–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weidner, N, Semple, JP, Welch, WR, et al. Tumour angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshimura, G, Sakurai, T, Oura, S, et al. Evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer with MRI. Breast Cancer 1999; 6: 249–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kvistad, KA, Rydland, J, Smethurst, HB, et al. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1464–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, AD, Staff, RT, Redpath, TW, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes. Br J Radiol 2002; 75: 220–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, SCA, Keller, TM, Forhlich, JM, et al. Preoperative breast cancer staging: MR imaging of the axilla with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement. Radiology 2002; 225: 527–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Memarsadeghi, M, Riedl, CC, Kaneider, A, et al. Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast carcinomas: Assessment with nonenhanced versus USPIO–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2006; 241: 367–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harada, T, Tanigawa, N, Matsuki, M, et al. Evaluation of lymph node metastases of breast cancer using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007; 63: 401–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luciani, A, Ha Dao, T, Lapeyre, M, et al. Simultaneous bilateral breast and high-resolution axillary MRI patients with breast cancer: Preliminary results. Am J Radiol 2004; 182: 1059–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Mack, MG, Balzer, JO, Straub, R, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes. Radiology 2002; 222: 239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harisinghani, MG, Saini, S, Slater, GJ, et al. MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes in primary pelvic carcinoma with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (combidex): preliminary observations. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 161–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahl, RL, Siegel, BA, Coleman, RE, et al. PET Study Group. Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovrics, PJ, Chen, V, Coates, G, et al. A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dissection for axillary staging in patients with early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11: 846–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veronesi, U, Cicco, C, Galimberti, VE. A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 473–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madeddu, G, Spanu, A. Use of tomographic nuclear medicine procedures, SPECT and pinhole SPECT, with cationic lipophilic radiotracers for the evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2004; 31(Suppl 1): S23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumachi, FAE, Ferretti, GB, Povolato, MB, et al. Axillary lymph node metastases detection with 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography in patients with breast cancer undergoing curative surgery. Anticancer Res 2007; 27(4 C): 2949–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Spanu, A, Dettori, G, Nuvoli, S, et al. (99)mTc-tetrofosmin SPET in the detection of both primary breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 1781–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schillaci, O, Scopinaro, F, Spanu, A, et al. Detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer with Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintigraphy. Int J Oncol 2002; 20: 483–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, S, Anorbe, E, Alcorta, P, et al. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: A systematic review. Am J Radiol 2006; 186: 1342–48.Google Scholar
Yang, WT, Chang, J, Metreweli, C. Patients with breast cancer: Differences in colour Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. Radiology 2000; 215: 568–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esen, G, Gurses, B, Yilmaz, MH, et al. Gray scale and power Doppler US in the preoperative evaluation of axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with no palpable nodes. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaria, G, Valasco, M, Farre, X, et al. Power Doppler sonography of invasive breast carcinoma: does tumour vascularization contribute to prediction of axillary status. Radiology 2005; 234: 374–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damera, A, Evans, AJ, Cornford, EJ, et al. Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 1310–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciatto, S, Brancato, B, Risso, G. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 103: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambah, A, Dixon, JM, Prescott, RJ, et al. Randomised study of axillary clearance versus four node sampling. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(suppl 5): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampaul, RS, Mullinger, K, Macmillan, RD, et al. Incidence of clinically significant lymphoedema as a complication following surgery for primary operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2165–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friale, M, Rull, M, Julian, FJ, et al. Sentinel node biopsy as a practical alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients: an approach to its validity. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 701–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijk, MJC, Deurloo, EE, Nieweg, OE, et al. Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 31–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchesne, N, Jaffey, N, Florack, P, et al. Redefining ultrasound criteria of positive axillary lymph nodes. Can Assoc Radiol J 2005; 56: 289–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Abe, H, Schmidt, RA, Sennett, CA, et al. US-guided core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: Why and how to do it. Radiographics 2007; 27: S91–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathanson, SD, Burke, M, Slater, R, et al. Preoperative identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3102–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, SH. Ultrasound-guided needle procedures in the breast. In: Stavros AT ed. Breast Ultrasound. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2004; 742–77.Google Scholar
Brenin, DR, Manasseh, DM, El-Tamer, M, et al. Factors correlating with lymph node metastases in patients with TI breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8: 432–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×