Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy
- Series page
- The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Cicero’s Philosophical Works
- A Note on Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cicero’s Philosophical Writing in Its Intellectual Context
- Chapter 2 The Ciceronian Dialogue
- Chapter 3 Philosophy in Cicero’s Letters
- Chapter 4 Philosophy in Cicero’s Speeches
- Chapter 5 Cicero and the Creation of a Latin Philosophical Vocabulary
- Chapter 6 Cicero and Plato
- Chapter 7 Cicero’s Academic Skepticism
- Chapter 8 Cosmology, Theology, and Religion
- Chapter 9 Determinism, Fate, and Responsibility
- Chapter 10 Cicero on the Emotions and the Soul
- Chapter 11 Ethical Theory and the Good Life
- Chapter 12 Nature and Social Ethics
- Chapter 13 Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Politics
- Chapter 14 Cicero’s Republicanism
- Chapter 15 Empire, Just Wars, and Cosmopolitanism
- Chapter 16 Cicero and Augustine
- Chapter 17 Cicero and Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
- Chapter 18 Cicero and Twenty-First-Century Political Philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index of Cicero’s Texts
- General Index
- Series page
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy
- Series page
- The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Cicero’s Philosophical Works
- A Note on Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cicero’s Philosophical Writing in Its Intellectual Context
- Chapter 2 The Ciceronian Dialogue
- Chapter 3 Philosophy in Cicero’s Letters
- Chapter 4 Philosophy in Cicero’s Speeches
- Chapter 5 Cicero and the Creation of a Latin Philosophical Vocabulary
- Chapter 6 Cicero and Plato
- Chapter 7 Cicero’s Academic Skepticism
- Chapter 8 Cosmology, Theology, and Religion
- Chapter 9 Determinism, Fate, and Responsibility
- Chapter 10 Cicero on the Emotions and the Soul
- Chapter 11 Ethical Theory and the Good Life
- Chapter 12 Nature and Social Ethics
- Chapter 13 Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Politics
- Chapter 14 Cicero’s Republicanism
- Chapter 15 Empire, Just Wars, and Cosmopolitanism
- Chapter 16 Cicero and Augustine
- Chapter 17 Cicero and Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
- Chapter 18 Cicero and Twenty-First-Century Political Philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index of Cicero’s Texts
- General Index
- Series page
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Cicero's Philosophy , pp. 301 - 326Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Ackrill, J. (1973) “Anamnēsis in the Phaedo,” in Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, ed. Lee, E. and Mourelatos, A.. Assen: 177–195.Google Scholar
Adams, C. F. (1856) The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States: With a Life of the Author, Notes and Illustrations, Vol. 1. Boston.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (1797) A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (2016) “Letter to Samuel Miller, July 7, 1820,” in John Adams: Writings from the New Nation 1784–1826, ed. Wood, G.. The Library of America. New York: 658–659.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (2017) “From John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 23 March 1809,” Founders Online. National Archives, http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-5324.Google Scholar
Albrecht, J., Degelman, C., Gasparini, V., et al. (2018) “Religion in the making: The lived ancient religion approach,” Religion 48: 568–593.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (2003) (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2014) “Why there are ends of both goods and evils in ancient ethical theory,” in Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, ed. Lee, M.-K.. Oxford: 231–254.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2008) “How to interpret Cicero’s dialogue on divination,” Interpretation 35: 105–121.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2009) “Womanly humanism in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 139: 411–45.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2016a) The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy: Platonis aemulus and the Invention of Cicero. Lanham, md.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2016b) “Interpreting Plato’s dream in De divinatione,” in The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy: Platonis aemulus and the Invention of Cicero, Altman, W. H. F.. Lanham, md: 179–195.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2010) “Empire and the laws of war: An archaeology,” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B.. Oxford: 30–52.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2013) “Plato’s Laws and Cicero’s De legibus,” in M. Schofield (2013c): 206–224.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (2016) (eds.) Cicero’s De finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Apolloni, D. (1996) “Plato’s affinity argument for the immortality of the soul,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 5–32.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arena, V. and Mac Góráin, F. (2017) (eds.) Varronian Moments. London. [= BICS 60.2, Dec. 2017.]Google Scholar
Arena, V. and Piras, G. (2016) (eds.) “Reconstructing the Republic: Varro and Imperial Authors (Rome, 22nd & 23rd September 2016),” special issue of Res publica litterarum 39.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990) “Philodemus’ Epicureanism,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.4: 2369–2406.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2008) “Cicero on natural law and the laws of the state,” Classical Antiquity 27.1: 1–33.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (1990) “‘Domina et regina virtutum’: justice and societas in De officiis,” Phronesis 35: 258–289.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (2002) “Old philosophy and new power: Cicero in fifth-century North Africa,” in G. Clark and T. Rajak (2002): 251–269.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2011a) “L’argument du De republica et le Songe de Scipion,” Les Études philosophiques 99: 455–469.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2011b) “The officia of St. Ambrose’s De officiis,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 19.1: 49–77.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2013a) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2013b) “Cicero on the relationship between Plato’s Republic and Laws,” in A. Sheppard (2013): 15–24.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2014) “A revolutionary doctrine? Cicero’s natural right teaching in Mably and Burke,” Classical Receptions Journal 6.2: 177–197.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2015) “Zeno’s Republic, Plato’s Laws, and the early development of Stoic natural law theory,” Polis 32.1: 166–190.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2017) “Natural law and civil religion: De legibus book ii,” in Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar zu De re publica und De legibus, ed. Höffe, O.. Klassiker Auslegen 64. Berlin: 167–186.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2018b) “Non-domination and the Libera res publica in Cicero’s republicanism,” History of European Ideas 44.6 (2018): 756–773. [Repr. as ch. 6 in Liberty: Ancient Ideas and Modern Perspectives, ed. V. Arena. London, 2021.]Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2019a) “Integrity and conscience in medical ethics: A Ciceronian perspective,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62.3: 470–488.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2019b) “Espoir et empire dans le songe de Scipion” (trans. C. Murgier), Les Cahiers Philosophiques 159.4: 27–41.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming a) “Cicero on the justice of war,” in N. Gilbert, M. Graver, and S. McConnell (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming b) “Patriotism and cosmopolitanism in Cicero’s De officiis,” in The Cambridge Critical Guide to De officiis, ed. Woolf, R.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aubert, S. (2011) “La φιλοστοργία chez Fronton, une vertu sans équivalent latin?,” Aitia. Regards sur la culture hellénistique au XXIe siècle 1, https://journals.openedition.org/aitia/.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2008) “Cicéron et la parole stoïcienne: polémique autour de la dialectique,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57: 61–91.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2014) “L’influence de la disputatio in utramque partem sur la correspondance de Cicéron,” Vita Latina 189–190: 21–39.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2015) “Un cas particulier de παρρησία: la parole sans détour (εὐθυρρημοσύνη) des Stoïciens,” Rhetorica 33: 71–96.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2018) “Terminology and practice of dialectic in Cicero’s letters,” in T. Bénatouïl and K. Ierodiakonou (2018): 254–282.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2021) Le grec et la philosophie dans la correspondance de Cicéron. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (2016) “Which protohistory of the text can be grasped from Carolingian manuscripts?,” in From the Protohistory to the History of the Text, ed. Velaza, X.. Frankfurt am Main: 45–53.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (2019) (ed., trans., introd.) La nature des dieux. Cicéron. Caen, www.unicaen.fr/puc/sources/ciceron/accueil/.Google Scholar
Babcock, W. (ed.) (2012) The City of God, Books 1–10, The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, 1/6, introduction and translation by W. Babcock, notes and edited by B. Ramsey. New York.Google Scholar
Babcock, W. (2013) The City of God, Books 11–22, The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, 2/6, introduction and translation by W. Babcock, notes and edited by B. Ramsey. New York.Google Scholar
Ballacci, G. (2018) Political Theory between Philosophy and Rhetoric: Politics as Transcendence and Contingency. London.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2013) “Cicero’s Consolatio ad se: Character, purpose and impact of a curious treatise,” in Greek and Roman Consolations, ed. Baltussen, H.. Swansea: 67–92.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) “Antiochus of Ascalon,” in Philosophia Togata, Vol. 1: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, ed. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 51–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2015) “Cicero and the just war,” in Mantissa: Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 4, ed. Barnes, J.. Oxford: 56–79.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1986) “Cicero and divination: The formation of a Latin discourse,” Journal of Roman Studies 76: 33–46.Google Scholar
BeDuhn, J. D. (2010) Augustine’s Manichaean Dilemma, Vol. 1: Conversion and Apostasy, 373–388 C. E. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Begemann, E. (2012) Schicksal als Argument. Ciceros Rede vom fatum in der späten Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Begemann, E. (2015) “Damaged go(o)ds: Cicero’s theological triad in the wake of German historicism,” in W. H. F. Altman (2015a): 247–280.Google Scholar
Begemann, E. (forthcoming) “Was haben die Götter mit Gerechtigkeit zu tun? Ciceros Theologie zwischen ratio und Resonanz,” in Zwischen Skepsis und Staatskult. Neue Perspektiven auf Ciceros De natura deorum, ed. Diez, C. and Schubert, C.. Bern.Google Scholar
Belayche, N., Bendlin, A., Rosenberger, V., and Rüpke, J. (2005) “Divination romaine,” Thesaurus Cultus et Rituum Antiquorum 3: 79–104.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2007) “Le débat entre platonisme et stoïcisme sur la vie scolastique: Chrysippe, la Nouvelle Académie et Antiochus,” in Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism, ed. Bonazzi, M. and Helming, C.. Leuven: 1–21.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2009) “Theôria et vie contemplative du stoïcisme au platonisme: Chrysippe, Panétius, Antiochus et Alcinoos,” in M. Bonazzi and J. Opsomer (2009): 3–31.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2016) “Structure, standards and Stoic moral progress in De finibus 4,” in J. Annas and G. Betegh (2016): 198–220.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (2018) (eds.) Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei. Les épicuriens et l’idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave. Brussels.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2014) “Noua uerba: réflexions sur la place des néologismes lucretiens dans la création d’un vocabulaire philosophique latin,” Latomus 73: 596–614.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969) “Two concepts of liberty,” in Four Essays on Liberty, Vol. 1. Oxford : 118–172.Google Scholar
Bermon, É. (2011) “Le Songe de Scipion dans la correspondance entre saint Augustin et Nectarius de Calama,” Les Études philosophiques 99.4: 521–542.Google Scholar
Besnier, B. (1993) “La nouvelle Académie selon le point de vue de Philon de Larissa,” in Scepticisme et exégèse: Hommages à Camille Pernot, ed. Besnier, B.. Fontenay and Saint-Cloud: 85–140.Google Scholar
Bochet, I. and Madec, G. (2012) “Augustin et l’Hortensius de Cicéron,” in Augustin philosophe et prédicateur: hommages à Goulven Madec, ed. Bochet, I.. Paris: 195–294.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2009) “Antiochus’ ethics and the subordination of stoicism,” in M. Bonazzi and J. Opsomer (2009): 33–54.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (2009) (eds.) The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. (2004a) L’ordre caché: la notion d’ordre chez saint Augustin. Paris.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. (2004b) “L’approche philosophique de l’œuvre d’Augustin au miroir de la Revue des Études Augustiniennes,” Revue des études augustiniennes 50.2: 325–347.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. (2009) “Augustin lecteur de Cicéron dans le Contra academicos,” Revue d’Études Anciennes 111.1: 95–114.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. (2016) “Affectus sunt, amores sunt: saint Augustin ou les passions revisitées,” in L’hommes et ses passions. Actes du Congrès Budé, organisé à Lyon, août 2013, ed. Ferrary, J.-L. and Franchet d’Espèrey, S.. Paris: 483–498.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. (2017) “Justice et châtiment. Augustine et la notion de poena,” in L’amour de la justice: de la Septante à Thomas d’Aquin, ed. Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I.. Pessac: 183–200.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. (2018) “‘Os illud Platonis’: scepticisme, platonisme et néoplatonisme dans le Contra academicos d’Augustin,” in Plato Latinus: Aspects de la transmission de Platon en latin dans l’Antiquité, ed. Guillaumin, J.-B. and Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 233–256.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1967) “Cicéron et la vie contemplative,” Latomus 26: 3–26. [Repr. in Études sur l’humanisme cicéronien, Collection Latomus 121 (1970): 89–113.]Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1969) “Trois citations de Platon chez Cicéron,” in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. Bibauw, J.. Brussels: 126–132.Google Scholar
Brachtendorf, J. (1997) “Cicero and Augustine on the passions,” Revue des études augustiniennes 43: 289–308.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2009) “Stoic souls in Stoic corpses,” in Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Frede, D. M. and Reis, B.. Berlin: 389–407.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2008) “Philo of Larissa,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/philo-larissa/.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2011) “Augustine as a reader of Cicero,” in Tolle Lege: Essays on Augustine and on Medieval Philosophy in Honor of Roland J. Teske, ed. Taylor, R. C., Twetten, D., and Wreen, M.. Milwaukee, wi: 81–114.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2012) “Self-knowledge in Cicero and Augustine (De trinitate, x, 5, 7–10, 16),” Medioevo 37: 107–135.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2016) “Cicero’s sceptical methods: The example of the De finibus,” in J. Annas and G. Betegh (2016): 12–40.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2014) The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. and Sedley, D. N. (2003) “Hellenistic philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. Sedley, D. N.. Cambridge: 151–183.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1986) “Cicero’s officium in the civil war,” Journal of Roman Studies 76: 12–32.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1982) “Gods and heaps,” in Language and Logos, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 315–338.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (unpublished) “Carneades was no probabilist,” https://fr.scribd.com/document/341395731/Carneades-Was-No-Probabilist.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (1936) (trans. and intro.) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Physicists. Cambridge, ma and London.Google Scholar
Byers, S. (2013) Perception, Sensibility, and the Moral Motivation in Augustine: A Stoic-Platonic Synthesis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Callanan, K. (2018) Montesquieu’s Liberalism and the Problem of Universal Politics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (2002) “Cicerone e la necessità della filosofia,” in Interpretare Cicerone. Percorsi della critica contemporanea, ed. Narducci, E.. Florence: 66–83.Google Scholar
Cappello, O. (2019) The School of Doubt: Skepticism, History and Politics in Cicero’s Academica. Leiden.Google Scholar
Carey, G. W. and McLellan, J. (2001) (eds.) The Federalist: The Gideon Edition. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (2001) “Dicaearchus’ philosophy of mind,” in W. W. Fortenbaugh and E. Schütrumpf (2001): 175–193.Google Scholar
Catapano, G. Catapano, G. (2001) Il concetto di filosofia nei primi scritti di Agostino. Analisi dei passi metafilosofici dal “Contra academicos” al “De uera religione.” Rome.Google Scholar
Catapano, G. Catapano, G. (2016) “Errore, assenso e fede. La critica dello scetticismo accademico nell’Enchiridion di Agostino,” in Scepticisme et religion. Constantes et évolutions, de la philosophie hellénistique à la philosophie médiévale, ed. Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. and Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 219–233.Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. (1966) “I ‘Soliloqui’ di Agostino e i libro I delle Tusculane,” Aevum 40: 550–552.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (1983) Libri, scritture, scribi a Ercolano: introduzione allo studio dei materiali Greci. Naples.Google Scholar
Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (2002) (eds.) Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, M. and Ruebel, J. (1985) “Philosophy and rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Milone,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 128.1: 57–72.Google Scholar
Clough, A. H. (1992) (trans.) Plutarch: Life of Cicero, in The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans, Vol. 2. New York.Google Scholar
Cole, T. B. (2019) “Ciceronian thought at the constitutional convention,” Global Intellectual History, doi:10.1080/23801883.2019.1637271.Google Scholar
Colish, M. L. (1985) The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, Vol. 2: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought through the Sixth Century. Leiden.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007a) “The new world order: Greek rhetoric in Rome,” in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, ed. Worthington, I.. Oxford: 139–165.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007b) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2009) “The politics of rhetorical education,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, E.. Cambridge: 126–141.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2013) “Cicero and the intellectual milieu of the Late Republic,” in C. Steel (2013a): 9–24.Google Scholar
Corwin, E. S. (1955) The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1983) “The stoicism of the New Academy,” in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Berkeley: 31–63.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (1986) “Cato’s stoicism and the understanding of Cicero’s speech Pro Murena,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 116: 229–239.Google Scholar
Cranston, M. (1982) Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Early Life and Work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712–1754. Chicago.Google Scholar
Dafoe, A., Renshon, J., and Huth, P. (2014) “Reputation and status as motives for war,” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 371–393.Google Scholar
DeFilippo, J. (2000) “Cicero vs. Cotta in De natura deorum,” Ancient Philosophy 20: 169–187.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, G. (2002) “Il parricidio di Cicerone. Le metamorfosi della verità tra gli Academica ciceroniani e il ‘Contra Academicos’ di Agostino (lettura di testi),” in Enosis kai Philia. Unione e Amicizia: Omaggio a Francesco Romano, ed. Barbanti, M., Giardina, G. R., and Manganaro, P.. Catania: 207–236.Google Scholar
Doignon, J. (1982) “L’enseignement de l’Hortensius de Cicéron sur les richesses devant la conscience d’Augustin jusqu’aux Confessions,” L’Antiquité classique 51: 193–206.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1965) “Cicero the philosopher,” in Cicero, ed. Dorey, T. A.. London: 135–170.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) “Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations,” in J. G. F. Powell (1995a): 197–218.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. K. (2019) Cato the Younger: Life and Death at the End of the Roman Republic. New York.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, M. (1992) “Le grec à Rome à l’époque de Cicéron, extension et qualité du bilinguisme,” Annales 47: 187–206.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, M. (2005) “Le grec de la correspondance de Cicéron: questions préliminaires sur un cas de bilinguisme,” Ling 41: 69–86.Google Scholar
Ducos, M. (2005) “Nigidius Figulus,” in Dictionnaire des Philosophes antiques, Vol. 4, ed. Goulet, R.. Paris: 703–712.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2009) “Rhetoric and the Roman Republic,” in The Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, E.. Cambridge: 178–193.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. C. (1983) “Conquête et esclavage chez Cicéron: De republica, iii, 36–37,” Ktema 8: 113–128.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. (2013) “Lucretius’ self-positioning in the history of Roman epicureanism,” Classical Quarterly 63: 785–800.Google Scholar
Elder, O. and Mullen, A. (2019) The Language of Roman Letters: Bilingual Epistolography from Cicero to Fronto. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erler, M. and Schofield, M. (1999) “Epicurean ethics,” in K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield (2003): 642–674.Google Scholar
Falconer, W. A. (tr. and intro.) (1923) Cicero: De senectute, De amicitia, De divinatione. Cambridge, ma and London.Google Scholar
Farrand, M. (1966) (ed.) The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. 3 vols. New Haven.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. M. (1989) “John Adams’s Autobiography: The Ciceronian paradigm and the quest for fame,” The New England Quarterly 62.4: 505–528.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010) “Fathers and sons: The Manlii Torquatii and family continuity in Catullus and Horace,” in Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman, eds Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C.. Oxford: 205–223.Google Scholar
Feldmann, E. (1975) Der Einfluss des Hortensius und des Manichäismus auf das Denken des jungen Augustinus von 373. Münster.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1974) “Le discours de Laelius dans le troisième livre du De re publica de Cicéron,” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome 86.2: 745–771.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1977) “Le discours de Philus (Cicéron, De re publica iii, 8–31) et la philosophie de Carnéade,” Revue des études latines 55: 128–156.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1988) Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate. Rome.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. (2016) “Philosophy in the expanded field: Ciceronian dialogue in Pollio’s letters from Spain (Fam. 10.31–33),” Arethusa 49: 549–573.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2000) Patrii sermonis egestas: Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache: ein Beitrag zum Sprachbewusstsein in der römischen Antike. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Foley, M. P. (1999) “Cicero, Augustine and the philosophical roots of the Cassiciacum Dialogues,” Revue des études augustiniennes 45: 51–77.Google Scholar
Foley, M. P. (2019a) (trans. and commentary) Against the Academics: Saint Augustine’s Cassiciacum Dialogues, Vol. 1. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Foley, M. P. (2019b) (trans. and commentary) On the Happy Life: Saint Augustine’s Cassiciacum Dialogues, Vol. 2. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2013) “Cicero’s Letter to Atticus 2.16: ‘A Great Controversy’,” Classical World 106: 515–519.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Schütrumpf, E. (2001) Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P. (1989) (eds.) Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Fortin, E. L. (1997) “Justice as the foundation of the political community: Augustine and his pagan models,” in Augustinus De civitate Dei, ed. Horn, Christoph. Berlin: 41–62.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. (2013) Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone: A Close Reading and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Fott, D. (2012) “The politico-philosophical character of Cicero’s verdict in De natura deorum,” in W. Nicgorski (2012): 152–179.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (1978) “The final proof of the immortality of the soul in Plato’s Phaedo 102a–107a,” Phronesis 23: 27–41.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1986) “The Stoic doctrine of the affections of the soul,” in The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge: 93–110.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987) “The skeptic’s two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge,” in Essays in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Frede, M. M.. Oxford: 201–222.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992) “Plato’s arguments and the dialogue form,” in Methods of Interpreting Plato, ed. Klagge, J. and Smith, N.. Oxford: 201–220.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1996) “The literary form of the Sophist,” in Form and Argument in Late Plato, ed. Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M.. Oxford: 135–151.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999) “Stoic epistemology,” in K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield (2003): 295–322.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2011) A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, ed. by Long, A. A. with a Foreword by D. N. Sedley. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Freeman, P. (2016) How to Grow Old: Ancient Wisdom for the Second Half of Life. Princeton.Google Scholar
Freeman, P. (2018) How to Be a Friend: An Ancient Guide to True Friendship. Princeton.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Th. (1992) “Das Kriterium der Wahrheit in Augustins Contra Academicos,” Vigiliae Christianae 46: 257–276.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Th. (1993) “Der Begriff ueri simile bei Cicero und Augustin,” Museum Helveticum 50: 107–125.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Th. (1997) Augustin, Contra Academicos (uel De Academicis) Bücher 2 und 3. Einleitung und Kommentar. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1989) “Aristotelian material in Cicero’s De natura deorum,” in W. W. Fortenbaugh and P. Steinmetz (1989): 201–219.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. L. (2001) “Metaphor in Cicero’s De re publica,” Classical Quarterly 51.2: 509–519.Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (1973) Roma e la filosofía greca dalle origine alla fine del ii secólo A.C. 2 vols. Turin.Google Scholar
Garsten, B. (2006) Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Gasparini, V., Patzelt, M., Raja, R., Rieger, A.-K., Rüpke, J., and Urciuoli, E. (2020) (eds.) Lived Religion in the Ancient Mediterranean World: Approaching Religious Transformations from Archaeology, History and Classics. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gawlick, G. and Görler, W. (1994) “Cicero,” in Die Philosophie der Antike, Vol. 4: Die Hellenistische Philosophie, ed. Flashar, H.. Basel: 991–1168.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (2001) “Philodème dans l’histoire de la littérature grecque,” in Cicéron et Philodème, ed. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 23–50.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1962) “Die Szenerie des ciceronischen Hortensius,” Philologus 106: 223–245.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2015) Among Friends: Cicero and the Epicureans. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Toronto.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N., Graver, M., and McConnell, S. (forthcoming) (eds.) Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2006) “Reckoning with tyranny: Greek thoughts on Caesar in Cicero’s Letters to Atticus in early 49,” in Ancient Tyranny, ed. Lewis., S. Edinburgh: 197–209.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013a) “Of Cicero’s Plato: Fictions, forms, foundations,” in M. Schofield (2013c): 225–275.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013b) “Cicero’s dialogues: Historiography manqué and the evidence of fiction,” in Der Dialog in der Antike, ed. Föllinger, S. and Müller, G. M.. Berlin: 235–274.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1988) “Personhood and personality: The four-personae theory in Cicero De officiis i,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 169–199.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. (1983) Die Ordnung der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De legibus. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. (1995) “Naturrecht und Naturgesetz: eine gerade Linie von Cicero zu Augustin?,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 138: 286–298.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) “Cicero’s philosophical affiliations,” in The Question of Eclecticism, ed. Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A.. Berkeley: 34–69.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1992) “Cicero’s philosophical affiliations again,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 17: 134–138.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) “Probabile, veri simile and related terms,” in J. G. F. Powell (1995a): 115–144.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2001) “Carneades in Rome: Some unsolved problems,” in J. G. F. Powell and J. North (2001): 57–82.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1987) “Hauptursachen bei Chrysipp und Cicero: Philologische Marginalien zu einem vieldiskutierten Gleichnis (De fato 41–44),” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 130: 254–274.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1994) “Cicero: Philosophie,” in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Die Philosophie der Antike, Vol. 4: Die Hellenistische Philosophie, Zweiter Halbband, ed. Flashar, H.. Basel: 1084–1118.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) “Silencing the troublemaker: De legibus 1.39 and the continuity of Cicero’s scepticism,” in J. G. F. Powell (1995a): 85–113.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1996) “Zum literarischen Charakter and zur Struktur der Tusculanae,” in ΛΗΝΑΙΚΑ: Festschrift für Carl Werner Müller, ed. Mueller-Goldingen, C. and Sier, K.. Stuttgart: 189–216.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1997) “Cicero’s philosophical stance in the Lucullus,” in Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, ed. Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: 36–57.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (2011) “Cicero, De finibus bonorum et malorum, Buch 5. Beobachtungen zur Quelle und zum Aufbau,” Elenchos 32: 329–354.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2014) “Comment se détermine le kathekon? Remarques sur la conformité à la nature et le raisonnable,” Philosophie Antique 14: 13–39.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002) (trans. and comm.) Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2009) “Cicero’s philosophy of religion,” in History of the Western Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 1, ed. Oppy, G. and Trakakis, N.. Durham: 119–132.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2016) “Honor and the honorable: Cato’s discourse in De finibus 3,” in J. Annas and G. Betegh (2016): 118–146.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (forthcoming) “The psychology of honor in Cicero’s De republica,” in N. Gilbert, M. Graver, and S. McConnell (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Green, W. M. (1970) Sancti Aurelii Augustini Contra academicos, De beata vita, De ordine, De magistro, De libero arbitrio. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1995) “Philosophical badinage in Cicero’s letters,” in J. G. F. Powell (1995a): 325–346.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1997a) “From Aristotle to Atticus: Cicero and Matius on friendship,” in Philosophia Togata, Vol. 2: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, ed. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T.. Oxford: 86–109.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1997b) “The composition of the Academica: Motives and versions,” in Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, ed. Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: 1–35.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2001) “Piso, Cicero and their audience,” in Cicéron et Philodème, La polémique en philosophie, ed. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 85–99.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, F. (2008) “Cicéron et les Lettres de Platon,” in Epistulae Antiquae 5: Actes du ve colloque international “L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens” (Université François-Rabelais, Tours, 6–7–8 septembre 2006), ed. Laurence, P. and Guillaumont, F.. Leuven-Paris: 127–137.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1960) “Citations de Porphyre chez saint Augustin (à propos d’un ouvrage récent),” Revue des études augustiniennes 6: 205–244.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2007) “Oratorical delivery and the emotions: Theory and practice,” in W. Dominik and J. Hall (2007): 218–234.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2013) “Saviour of the Republic and father of the fatherland: Cicero and political crisis,” in C. Steel (2013a): 215–229.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State. London.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (2003) “Roman opinions about the truthfulness of dreams,” Journal of Roman Studies 93: 18–34.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2013) “The texts of Plato and Aristotle in the first century bc,” in M. Schofield (2013c): 1–27.Google Scholar
Henry, M. Y. (1927) “Cicero’s treatment of the free will problem,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 58: 32–42.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2015) “Philosophy and philosophi: From Cicero to Apuleius,” in G. Williams and K. Volk (2015): 13–29.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1877) Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s philosophischen Schriften, i. Theil: De Natura Deorum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1882) Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s philosophischen Schriften, ii. Theil: De finibus. De officiis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1883) Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s philosophischen Schriften, iii. Theil: Academica Priora, Tusculanae Disputationes. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. (2017) Res Publica and the Roman Republic: “Without Body or Form.” Oxford.Google Scholar
Holte, R. (1962) Béatitude et Sagesse, Saint Augustin et le problème de la fin de l’homme dans la philosophie ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Homeyer, H. (1956) “Zu Bedeutungsgeschichte von ‘Sapientia’,” L’Antiquité Classique 25.2: 301–318.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2015) Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1979) “Doctus sermones utriusque linguae?,” Échos du monde classique 23: 85–95.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (2013) The Philosophical Dialogue: A Poetics and a Hermeneutics. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Houston, G. W. (2013) “The non-Philodemus book collection in the villa of the Papyri,” in J. König, K. Oikonomopoulou, and G. Woolf (2013): 183–208.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1902) Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals by David Hume, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1985a) “Of the original contract,” in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, E.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1985b) “Of eloquence,” in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, E.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1998) The Warrior’s Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience. New York.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1990) “Rhetorica Disputatio: The strategy of de Finibus ii,” Apeiron 23: 143–164.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (1997) (eds.) Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1986) Opinione e scienzia: il dibattito tra Stoici e Accademici nel iii e nel ii secolo A. C. Naples.Google Scholar
Jacotot, M. (2013) Question d’honneur. Les notions d’honos, honestum et honestas dans la République romaine antique. Rome.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. W. (1923) Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jeanmart, G. (2006) Herméneutique et subjectivité dans les Confessions d’Augustin. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1982) “Varro’s Antiquitates rerum divinarum and religious affairs in the late Roman Republic,” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 65: 148–205.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. T. (1981) Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1949) Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. T. K. Abbott. London.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. (2011a) “Cicero on decorum and the morality of rhetoric,” European Journal of Political Theory 10.1: 92–112.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. and Schwarze, M. A. (2016) “The rhetoric of sincerity: Cicero and Smith on propriety and political context,” American Political Science Review 110.1: 100–111.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. and Remer, M. G. (2021) The Ciceronian Tradition in Political Theory. Madison.Google Scholar
Keller, A. (2012) Cicero und der gerechte Krieg: Eine ethisch-staatsphilosophische Untersuchung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kempshall, M. (2001) “De re publica 1.39 in medieval and Renaissance political thought,” in J. Powell and J. North (2001): 91–135.Google Scholar
Kendeffy, G. (2015) “Lactantius as Christian Cicero, Cicero as shadow-like instructor,” in W. H. F. Altman (2015a): 57–78.Google Scholar
Kerschensteiner, J. (1986) “Cicero und Hirtius,” in Studien zur Alten Geschichte. S. Lauffer zum 70. Geburtstag am 4. August 1981 dargebracht von Freunden, Kollegen und Schülern. Band ii, ed. Kalcyk, H. and Lauffer, S.. Rome: 559–575.Google Scholar
King, P. (1995) (trans., introd. and notes) Augustine: Against the Academicians and The Teacher. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Koch, B. (2006) Philosophie als Medizin: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes. Palingenesia 90. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K., and Woolf, G. (2013) (eds.) Ancient Libraries. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2008) A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus. Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. (1948) “Du monde de l’à-peu-près à l’univers de la précision,” Critique 4: 806–823. [Repr. in Etudes d’histoire de la pensée philosophique. Paris, 1971: 311–329.]Google Scholar
Kragelund, P. (2001) “Dreams, religion and politics in Republican Rome,” Historia 50: 53–95.Google Scholar
Kreter, F. (2006) Kann Fabius bei einer Seeschlacht sterben? Die Geschichte der Logik des Kontingenzproblems von Aristoteles, De interpretatione 9 bis Cicero, De fato. Trier.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2000) “Beyond (dis)belief: Rhetorical form and religious symbols in Cicero’s de Divinatione,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 130: 353–391.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2000) “The Laws,” in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 258–292.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (1995) (eds.) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. (1982) “The technique of persuasion in Cicero’s Pro Murena,” in Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, ed. Ludwig, W.. Geneva: 193–228.Google Scholar
Leeman, A., Pinkster, H., and Nelson, H. (1985) (eds.) M. Tullius Cicero: De oratore libri iii. Vol. 2. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2019) Varrone, unus scilicet antiquorum hominum. Senso del passato e pratica antiquaria. Bari.Google Scholar
Levine, P. (1957) “The original design and publication of the De natura deorum,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 62: 7–36.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1978) “Scepticisme et dogmatisme dans l’Académie: ‘l’ésotérisme’ d’Arcésilas,” Revue des études latines 56: 335–348.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1984) “La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres ii et iv du De finibus,” Revue des études latines 62: 111–127.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992a) Cicero Academicus: recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie Cicéronienne. Collection de l’Ecole Française de Rome 162. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992b) “Cicéron créateur du vocabulaire latin de la connaissance,” in La langue latine langue de la philosophie, ed. Grimal, P.. Rome: 91–106.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1995) “Le mythe de la naissance de la civilisation chez Cicéron,” in Mathesis e Philia. Studi in onore di Marcello Gigante, ed. Cerasuolo, S.. Naples: 155–168.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1996) “Doxographie et philosophie chez Cicéron,” in Le concept de nature à Rome. La physique. Actes du séminaire de philosophie romaine de Paris xii-Val de Marne (1992–1993), ed. Lévy, C.. Paris: 109–123.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2001) “Cicéron et l’épicurisme: la problématique de l’éloge paradoxal,” in Cicéron et Philodème. La polémique en philosophie, ed. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 61–75.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2002a) “Les Tusculanes et le dialogue cicéronien: exemple ou exception?,” Vita Latina 166: 23–31.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2002b) “L’Âme et le moi dans les Tusculanes,” Revue des études latines 80: 78–94.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2003) “Cicero and the Timaeus,” in The Timaeus as Cultural Icon, ed. Reydams-Schils, G.. Notre Dame: 95–110.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2005) “Les petits Académiciens: Lacyde, Charmadas, Métrodore de Stratonice,” L’eredità Platonica. Studi sul platonismo da Arcesila a Proclo, ed. Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V.. “Elenchos” 45. Naples: 51–77.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2006) “Y a-t-il quelqu’un derrière le masque? À propos de la théorie des personae chez Cicéron,” in Vivre pour soi, vivre pour la cité, de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, ed. Galand-Hallyn, P. and Lévy, C.. Paris: 45–58.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2008) “Cicéron, le moyen platonisme et la philosophie romaine: à propos de la naissance du concept latin de qualitas,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 57: 5–20.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2012) “Philosophical life versus political life,” in W. Nicgorski (2012): 58–78.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. and Guillaumin, J.-B. (2018) “Présentation,” in Plato Latinus: aspects de la transmission de Platon en Latin dans l’Antiquité, ed. Guillemain, J.-B. and Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 7–29.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1997) “The theory of the mixed constitution at Rome,” in Philosophia Togata, Vol. 2: Plato and Aristotle in Rome, ed. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T.. Oxford: 70–85.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1824) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in The Works of John Locke in Nine Volumes, Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1988) Second Treatise of Government, in Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995a) “Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle,” in J. G. F. Powell (1995a): 37–61.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995b) “Cicero’s politics in De officiis,” in A. Laks and M. Schofield (1995): 213–240.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (2015) “Academic eloquence and the end of Cicero’s De finibus,” Ancient Philosophy 35: 183–198.Google Scholar
Lütcke, K. H. (1968) “Auctoritas” bei Augustin. Mit einer Einleitung zur römischen Vorgeschichte des Begriffs. Stuttgart, Berlin, Cologne, and Mainz.Google Scholar
MacBain, B. (1982) Prodigy and Expiation: A Study in Religion and Politics in Republican Rome. Brussels.Google Scholar
Madec, G. (1969) “L’Hortensius de Cicéron dans les livres xiii–xiv du De trinitate,” Revue des études augustiniennes 15: 167–173.Google Scholar
Madec, G. (1992) “Augustin et Porphyre. Ébauche d’un bilan des recherches et des conjonctures,” in ΣΟΦΙΗΣ ΜΑΙΗΤΟΡΕΣ. “Chercheurs de sagesse”: Hommages à Jean Pépin, ed. Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Madec, G., and O’Brien, D.. Paris: 367–382.Google Scholar
Madec, G. (1994) “Les embarras de la citation,” Petites Études augustiniennes. Paris: 307–318.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G. (1991) L’οἰκείωσις peripatetica in Ario Didimo e nel “De finibus” di Cicerone. Turin.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990) “Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the ‘Placita,’” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36.4: 3056–3229.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1995) “Sources,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge: 22–44.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2012) “The speeches to the people in Cicero’s oratorical corpora,” Rhetorica 30:153–175.Google Scholar
May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (2001) (trans. and intro.) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayer, P. Feldmann, E., Geerlings, W. et al. (1986–) Augustinus Lexikon. Basle and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1960) Les rapports de la rhétorique et de la philosophie dans l’œuvre de Cicéron. Recherches sur les fondements philosophiques de l’art de persuader. Paris.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1973) “Rhétorique et philosophie dans les traités de Cicéron,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1.3: 139–208.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D. (2001) “Dicaearchus of Messana: The sources, text and translation,” in W. W. Fortenbaugh and E. Schütrumpf (2001): 1–142.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2015) The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome. Cambridge. [Originally published as La Raison de Rome: naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République. Paris, 1997.]Google Scholar
Moatti, C. and Riot-Sarcey, M. (2009) (eds.) La République dans tous ses états. Paris.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1984) “The theological efforts of the Roman upper class in the first century bc,” Classical Philology 79: 199–211.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. (1999) Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. (2002) “Discourse on Cicero” (trans. David Fott), Political Theory 30.5: 733–737.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (2016) “Cicero and Epicurean virtues (De finibus 1–2),” in J. Annas and G. Betegh (2016): 77–95.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1979) “Osservazioni zu lessico filosofico di Cicerone,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 3.9: 99–178.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Musial, D. (2001) “Sodalicium Nigidiani: les Pythagoriciens à Rome à la fin de la République,” Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 218: 339–367.Google Scholar
in The Ciceronian Tradition in Political Theory, ed. Kapust, D. J. and Remer, G.. Madison, WI: 140–159.Google Scholar
Nederman, C. J. (2020) The Bonds of Humanity: Cicero’s Legacies in European Social and Political Thought, ca. 1100–ca. 1550. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Neuschäfer, B. (2010) “Lingua graeca,” in Augustinus Lexikon, Vol. 3.7–8, ed. Mayer, C. et al. Basel: 1005–1011.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. (1992) “Cicero’s Socrates: Assessment of ‘the Socratic turn,’” in Law and Philosophy: The Practice of Theory, Vol. 1, ed. Murley, J., Stone, R., and Braithwaite, W.. Athens, OH: 213–233.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. (2016) Cicero’s Skepticism and His Recovery of Political Philosophy. New York.Google Scholar
Nicolas, C. (1996) Utraque lingua: le calque sémantique: domaine gréco-latin. Louvain.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1997) “Kant and Stoic cosmopolitanism,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 5.1: 1–25.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) “Duties of justice, duties of material aid: Cicero’s problematic legacy,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 8.2: 176–206.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2019) The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Levmore, S. (2017) Aging Thoughtfully: Conversations about Retirement, Romance, Wrinkles, and Regret. Oxford.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2002) “‘All gods are true’ in Epicurus,” in Traditions of Theology, ed. Frede, D. M. and Laks, A.. Leiden: 183–221.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (1980) “Augustine’s classical readings,” Recherches Augustiniennes 15: 144–175.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (1992) Augustine’s Confessions. 3 vols. Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (2015) “Augustine – Cicero ‘Redivivus’,” Kampf oder Dialog? Conflict/Dialog? Augustine’s Engagement with Cultures in De ciuitate dei, International Symposium, 25–29 September 2012, ed. Müller, C. in cooperation with Dodaro, R. and Fitzgerald, A. D.. Würzburg: 103–113.Google Scholar
Ohlmann, A. D. (1897) De S. Augustini Dialogis in Cassiciaco scriptis, Inaugural Dissertation. Argentorati.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar
Orend, B. (2008) “War,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N. (Fall 2008 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/war/.Google Scholar
Paulson, Lex (forthcoming) Voluntas populi: Free Will and the Fall of Cicero’s Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Patzig, G. (1979) “Cicero als Philosoph, am Beispiel der Schrift De finibus,” Gymnasium 86: 304–322.Google Scholar
Peart, S. J. and Levy, D. M. (2008) “Adam Smith and his sources: The evil of independence,” The Adam Smith Review 4: 57–87.Google Scholar
Pease, A. (1955–1958) (ed.) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. 2 vols. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
Pic, A. (1997) “Saint Augustin et l’impiété de Cicéron: Étude du De Ciuitate Dei v, 9,” Studia Patristica 33: 213–220.Google Scholar
Pizzolato, L. (1974) “L’amicizia in sant’Agostino e il ‘Laelius’ di Cicerone,” Vigiliae Christianae 28: 203–215.Google Scholar
Poncelet, R. (1957) Cicéron traducteur de Platon: l’expression de la pensée complexe en latin classique. Paris.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1995b) “Cicero’s works and their background,” in J. G. F. Powell (1995a): 1–35.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2001) “Were Cicero’s Laws the laws of Cicero’s Republic?,” in J. G. F. Powell and J. North (2001): 7–39.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2006) (ed.) M. Tulli Ciceronis: De re publica, De legibus, Cato major, De senectute, Laelius, De amicitia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2012) “Cicero’s De re publica and the virtues of the statesman,” in W. Nicgorski (2012): 14–42.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2013a) “Cicero’s reading of Plato’s Republic,” in Sheppard (2013): 35–57.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2013b) “The embassy of the three philosophers to Rome in 155 b.c.,” in Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, ed. Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K.. Oxford: 219–247.Google Scholar
Prost, P. (2006) “Humanitas: originalité d’un concept cicéronien,” Philosophies de l’humanisme, L’art du comprendre 15: 31–46.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. (1999) “Epicurus on free volition and the atomic swerve,” Phronesis 44: 253–299.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. (2007) “Roman senatorial oratory,” in W. Dominik and J. Hall (2007): 122–135.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2016) “Cicero and Augustine on grasping the truth,” in Philosophie in Rom, römische Philosophie, Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven, ed. Müller, G. M. and Mariani Zini, F.. Berlin: 305–323.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2018) “Pithana and probabilia in Sextus and Cicero,” in T. Bénatouïl and K. Ierodiakonou (2018): 218–253.Google Scholar
Remer, G. (2017) Ethics and the Orator: The Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1999) Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2002) “Human bonding and oikeiôsis in Roman stoicism,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 221–251.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2015) “Teaching Pericles: Cicero on the study of nature,” in K. Volk and G. Williams (2015): 91–107.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2016) “Dio of Prusa and the Roman Stoics on how to speak the truth to oneself and to power,” in Philosophy and Political Power in Antiquity, ed. Arruzza, C. and Nikulin, D.. Leiden: 134–147.Google Scholar
Ribreau, M. (2012) “Quand une chrétienne prend la parole: Monique dans le De ordine et le De beata uita d’Augustin,” Cahiers “Mondes anciens” 3, http://mondesanciens.revues.org/index773.html.Google Scholar
Richard, C. J. (2015) “Cicero and the American founders,” in W. H. F. Altman (2015a): 124–143.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2010) The Philosophy of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy. London.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, V. (1998) Gezähmte Götter: Das Prodigienwesen der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997) Of the Social Contract, ed. and trans. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (2003) “The status of the ‘myth’ in Plato’s Timaeus,” in Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, ed. C. Natali and S. Maso. Amsterdam: 21–31.Google Scholar
Ruch, M. (1958a) Le préambule dans les œuvres philosophiques de Cicéron. Essai sur la genèse et l’art du dialogue. Paris.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2006) “Communicating with the gods,” in A Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Morstein-Marx, R. and Rosenstein, N.. Oxford: 215–235.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012) Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2013) “New perspectives on ancient divination,” in Divination in the Ancient World: Religious Options and the Individual, ed. Rosenberger, V.. Stuttgart: 9–20.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2008) “The fetials and their ius,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 51: 63–93.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2015) Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. (2015) “Dichotomy in the conception of natural law in Cicero’s De legibus?” (trans. A. Lewis), “Gesetz-Rhetorik-Gewalt,” special issue of Ancilla Iuris, ed. Vesting, T.: 125–153.Google Scholar
Schallenberg, M. (2008) Freiheit und Determinismus: Ein philosophischer Kommentar zu Ciceros Schrift De fato. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schlapbach, K. (2006) “Hortensius,” in Augustinus Lexikon, Vol. 3.3–4, ed. Mayer, C. et al. Basel: 425–436.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. (1972) Cicero Scepticus: A Study of the Influence of the Academica in the Renaissance. The Hague.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1980) “Preconception, argument and God,” in Doubt and Dogmatism, ed. Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M., and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 283–308.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1986) “Cicero for and against divination,” Journal of Roman Studies 76: 47–65.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995b) “Two Stoic approaches to justice,” in A. Laks and M. Schofield (1995): 191–212.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2002) “Academic therapy: Philo of Larissa and Cicero’s project in the Tusculans,” in G. Clark and T. Rajak (2002): 91–107.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2003) “Stoic ethics,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 233–256.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) “Ciceronian dialogue,” in The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, ed. Goldhill, S.. Cambridge: 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013a) “Cosmopolitanism, imperialism, and justice in Cicero’s Republic and Laws,” Intellectual History and Political Thought 2.1: 5–34.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013c) (ed.) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2015) “Liberty, equality and authority: A political discourse in the later Roman Republic,” in A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic, ed. Hammer, D.. London: 113–127.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2017a) “Cicero on imperialism and the soul,” in Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill, ed. Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2017b) “Cicero’s Plato,” in From Stoicism to Platonism, ed. Engberg-Pedersen, T.. Cambridge: 47–66.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (forthcoming) “Juris consensus revisited,” in N. Gilbert, M. Graver, and S. McConnell (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Schubert, C. (2017) “Remarks on the philosophical reflections of fate in the writings of Seneca,” Mythos: Rivista di Storia delle religioni 10: 125–154.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2009) “Epicureanism in the Roman Republic,” in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2011) “Epicurus’ theological innatism,” in Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, ed. Fish, J. and Sanders, R. K.. Cambridge: 29–51.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (2013) “Cicero and Seneca on the fate of the soul: Private feelings and philosophical doctrines,” in The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Rüpke, J.. Oxford: 455–488.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–1970) (ed.) Cicero’s Letters to Atticus. 7 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) (ed.) Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares. 2 Vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980) (ed.) Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, A. A. C. (2001) Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. 3 vols. ed. Den Uyl, D.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M. (2015) “Cicero, Voltaire, and the philosophes in the French Enlightenment,” in W. H. F. Altman (2015a): 329–356.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1991) Cicero: On Fate & Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. and Sorabji, R. (2007) (eds) Greek and Roman Philosophy: 100 bc–200 ad. London.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (2013) (ed.) Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Republic. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies supplement 117. London.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (1996) Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. Princeton.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1982) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1985) Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, ed. Bryce, J. C.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2019) “Varro and the contours of Roman antiquarianism,” Latomus 77: 1090–1118.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1995) “‘A self-indulgent misuse of leisure and writing’? how not to write philosophy: Did Cicero get it right?,” in Powell (1995a): 301–323.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. W. (2007) Greek and Roman Philosophy, 100 bc–200 ad. 2 vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 94. London.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2013b) “Structure, meaning and authority in Cicero’s dialogues,” in Der Dialog in der Antike, ed. Föllinger, S. and Müller, G. M.. Berlin: 221–234.Google Scholar
Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.) (2013). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Steele, R. B. (1900) “The Greek in Cicero’s epistles,” The American Journal of Philology 21: 387–410.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1989) “Beobachtungen zu Ciceros philosophischem Standpunkt,” in W. W. Fortenbaugh and P. Steinmetz (1989): 1–22.Google Scholar
Stem, R. (2006) “Cicero as orator and philosopher: The value of the Pro Murena for Ciceronian political thought,” Review of Politics 68.2: 206–231.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2015) Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2016) Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Straume-Zimmermann, L., Broemser, F., and Gigon, O. (eds.) (1990) Marcus Tullius Cicero: Hortensius, Lucullus, Academici Libri. Munich and Zürich.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1975) Taxis und Taktik: die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Stull, W. (2012) “Reading the Phaedo in Tusculan Disputations 1,” Classical Philology 107: 38–52.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1995) “Cicero and Greek philosophy,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 53–61.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (2002) “Bilingualism in Cicero? The evidence of code switching,” in Bilingualism in Ancient Society, ed. Adams, J. N., Jansse, M., and Swain, S.. Oxford: 128–167.Google Scholar
Taran, L. (1987) “Cicero’s attitude towards stoicism and skepticism in De natura deorum,” in Florilegium Columbianum: Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Selig, K.-L. and Somerville, R.. New York: 1–22.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1985) Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
ten Berge, B. (2013) “Dreams in Cicero’s De divinatione: Philosophical tradition and education,” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 15: 53–66.Google Scholar
Testard, M. (1954) “Note sur De ciuitate Dei xxii, 24: exemple de réminiscences cicéroniennes de saint Augustin,” in Augustinus Magister: congrès international augustinien, Vol. 1. Paris: 193–200.Google Scholar
Testard, M. (1986) “Cicero,” in Augustinus Lexikon, Vol. 1, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: 913–930.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y.-P. (1980) “Res, chose et patrimoine (Note sur le rapport sujet-objet en droit romain),” Archives de philosophie du droit 25: 413–426.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2010) “Arcesilaus and Carneades,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, ed. Bett, R.. Cambridge: 58–80.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2012) “Radical and mitigated skepticism in Cicero’s Academica,” in W. Nicgorski (2012): 133–151.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. (2013) “Libraries and intellectual debate in the late Republic: The case of the Aristotelian corpus,” in J. König, K. Oikonomopoulou, and G. Woolf (2013): 152–166.Google Scholar
Van der Meeren, S. (2007) “La sagesse ‘droit chemin de la vie’: lecture d’une métaphore du Contra Academicos à la lumière de la tradition du protreptique philosophique,” Revue des études augustiniennes et patristiques 53: 81–111.Google Scholar
Van der Meeren, S. (2011) Exhortation à la philosophie. Le dossier grec: Aristote. Paris.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. (1997) “Civitas dei-terrena civitas: The concept of the two antithetical cities and its sources (book 11–14),” in Augustinus De civitate Dei, ed. Horn, C.. Berlin: 157–169.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. (2008) Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. New York.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2017) “Signs, seers and senators: Divinatory expertise in Cicero and Nigidius Figulus,” in Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, ed. König, J. and Woolf, G.. Cambridge: 329–347.Google Scholar
Volk, K. and Williams, G. (2015) (eds.) Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Von Heyking, J. (2007) “Taming warriors in classical and early medieval political theory,” in Ethics, Nationalism, and Just War: Medieval and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Syse, H. and Reichberg, G. M.. Washington, DC: 11–35.Google Scholar
Vössing, K. (1997) Schule und Bildung im Nordafrika der römischen Kaiserzeit. Brussels.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1973) “Political action: The problem of dirty hands,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 160–180.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. (2006) Cicero On Divination: De divinatione Book 1, trans. with intro. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2001) “Epicurus and the pleasures of the future,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 135–179.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2013) “The harm of death in Cicero’s First Tusculan,” in The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death: New Essays, ed. Taylor, J.. Oxford: 44–70.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2016) “Epicurean pleasure in Cicero’s De finibus,” in J. Annas and G. Betegh (2016): 41–76.Google Scholar
Watts, N. H. (1931) (ed.) Cicero: Pro Milone, In Pisonem, Pro Scauro, Pro Fonteio, Pro Rabirio Postumo, Pro Marcello, Pro Ligario, Pro Rege Deiotaro. Loeb Classical Library 252. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (2015) Copia verborum: Cicero’s Philosophical Translations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Princeton.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973) “A critique of utilitarianism,” in Utilitarianism for and Against, ed. Smart, J. and Williams, B.. New York: 77–150.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. (2012 ) The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2007) Collected Works of James Wilson, Vol. 1, ed. Hall, K. L. and Hall, M. D.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wissowa, G. (1912) Religion und Kultus der Römer. Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 4. Munich.Google Scholar
Wood, N. (1983) The Politics of Locke’s Philosophy: A Social Study of “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.” Berkeley.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2007) “Particularism, promises, and persons in Cicero’s De officiis,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 317–346.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. P. F. (2014) “Learned and wise: Cotta the sceptic in Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47: 245–273.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. P. F. (2019) Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion: On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2010) “Traditional political culture and the people’s role in the Roman Republic,” Historia 59: 282–302.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1996) “Natural law and poetic justice: A Carneadean debate in Cicero and Vergil,” Classical Philology 91.4: 297–319.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1999) (ed. and trans.) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2003) “Plato with pillows: Cicero on the uses of Greek Culture,” in Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, ed. Braund, D. and Gill, C.. Exeter: 119–138.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2017) “The attack on justice: Cicero, Lactantius, and Carneades,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 160: 299–319.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. (1962) Cicero Platonis Aemulus: Untersuchungen über die Form von Ciceros Dialogen, besonders von De oratore. Zürich.Google Scholar