Book contents
Part II - Practical Reason, Normativity and Ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence , pp. 131 - 242Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited
Bowlin, J. 1999. Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J.M., Grisez, G. and Tollefsen, C. 1976. Free Choice: A Self-Referential Argument. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J.M. 2002. ‘Free Choice, Incomparably Valuable Options and Incommensurable Categories of Good’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 47: 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J.M. 2005. ‘Free Choice, Incommensurable Goods, and the Self-Refutation of Determinism’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 50: 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J.M. 2013. ‘On the Most Fundamental Principle of Morality’. In eds. Keown, J. and George, R.P., Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, S.L. 2015. ‘Practical Truth and its First Principles in the Theory of Grisez, Boyle, and Finnis’. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15: 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J., Boyle, J.M. and Grisez, G. 1987. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Natural Law and Natural Rights revised edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. Collected Essays Volume I: Reason in Action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011c. Collected Essays Volume IV: Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2015. ‘Grounding Human Rights in Natural Law’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 60: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. 1972. ‘Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives’. Philosophical Review 81: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. and Tollefsen, C. 2013. ‘Natural Law’. In ed. LaFollette, H., The International Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Girgis, S. 2016. ‘Subjectivity Without Subjectivism: Revisiting the Is/Ought Gap’, in eds. Snell, R.J. and McGuire, S.F., Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1965. ‘The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, Article 2’. Natural Law Forum 10: 168–201.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1983. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Volume I, Christian Moral Principles. Franciscan Herald Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J. 1987. ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends’, American Journal of Jurisprudence 32: 99–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J., Finnis, J. and May, W.E. 1988. ‘“Every Marital Act Ought To Be Open to New Life”: Toward a Clearer Understanding’. The Thomist, 52: 365–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 2001. ‘Natural Law, God, Religion, and Human Fulfillment’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 46: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 2008. ‘The True Ultimate End of Human Beings: The Kingdom, Not God Alone’. Theological Studies 69: 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. Unpublished. ‘Sketch of a Complete, Systematic, Philosophical Ethics’.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1987. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1985. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. By Beck, L.W.. Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 2002. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by Litzinger, C.I.. Henry Regnery Co.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2015. ‘Suffering, Enhancement, and Human Goods’. Quaestiones Disputatae 5: 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2016. ‘First and Third Person Standpoints in the New Natural Law Theory’, in eds. Snell, R.J. and McGuire, S.F., Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern. Lexington Books: 95–114.Google Scholar
Veatch, H. 1990. ‘Natural Law and the ‘Is-Ought’ Question: Queries to Finnis and Grisez’, in Swimming Against the Current in Contemporary Philosophy. Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited
Anscombe, E. 1981. ‘On the Source of Authority of the State’. Ethics, Religion and Politics: Collected Philosophical Papers of GEM Anscombe. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 2006. Metaphysics Book Θ. trans. with an introduction and commentary by Makin, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1976. ‘Freedom and Action’. In ed. Lehrer, K.. Freedom and Determinism Random House.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2009. ‘Change and its Relation to Actuality and Potentiality’. In ed. Anagnostopoulos, G.. A Companion to Aristotle. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enoch, D. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. 1994. ‘Aristotle’s Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics Θ’. In eds. Scaltsas, T., Charles, D. and Gill, M., Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Clarendon Press,Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1969. ‘The First Principle of Practical Reason, A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, article 2’. In ed. Kenny, A., Aquinas. A Collection of Critical Essays. MacMillanGoogle Scholar
Marmor, A. 2007. ‘Deep Conventions’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 586–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Blanco, V. 2012. ‘If You Cannot Help Being Committed to It, Then It Exists: A Defence of Robust Realism in Law’. In: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32: 823–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Blanco, V. 2014a. ‘Does Practical Reason Need Interpretation?’ Ragion Practica: 317–340.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Blanco, V. 2014b. Law and Authority Under the Guise of the Good. Hart-Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Blanco, V. 2016. ‘Re-Examining Deep Conventions: Practical Reason and Forward-Looking Agency’. In Metaphilosophy of Law, edited by Gizbert-Studnicki, T.. Hart-Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. 1995. Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. 2007. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy Again: Isolating the Promulgation Problem’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited
Anscombe, E. 1997. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’. In Virtue Ethics eds. Crisp, R. and Slote, M.. Oxford University Press: 26–44Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1751/1975. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Nidditch, P.H.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1785/1996. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals trans. and ed. Gregor, M.J. Practical Philosophy in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pink, T. 2004. ‘Moral obligation’ in Modern Moral Philosophy ed. O’Hear, A.. Cambridge University Press: 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, T. 2014. ‘Law and the Normativity of Obligation’. Jurisprudence, 5: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, T. 2016. Self-Determination: The Ethics of Action Volume 1. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punch, J. 1639. ‘Commentary on Scotus on the Decalogue distinctio 37’. In Scotus, Duns, Opera Omnia, volume 7, ed. Wadding, L.. Lyons: 857–877.Google Scholar
Works Cited
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1981 ‘Mr Truman’s Degree’, The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, vol. III (Ethics, Religion and Politics). Blackwell: 62–71Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1920. The Summa Theologica of St Thomas Aquinas Literally Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne LtdGoogle Scholar
Augustine, , 1993. On Free Choice of the Will. Trans Williams, T., Indianapolis, IN: HackettGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A.J. 1952 [1936]. ‘Critique of Ethics and Theology’. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Mineola, NY: DoverCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, , 1998. The Republic, The Laws. (trans. Rudd, N.) Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hittinger, R.A. 1989. Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. Indiana: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 2000. Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-consequentialist Theory of Morality, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1739. (1975) A Treatise of Human Nature 2nd Edn., Selby-Bigge, & Nidditch, (eds.) Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1751. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Ed. Beauchamp, T. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J.A. 2004. ‘Law, Liberalism and the Common Good’ Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law. Ed. Oderberg, D.S. and Chappell, T.D.J., London, Macmillan, pp. 184–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J.A. 2013 ‘Infanticide: A reply to Giubilini and Minerva’ 154 Journal of Medical Ethics (2013) 336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J.A. 1997. ‘Innocence and Consequentialism’ in Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics, eds. Laing, J.A. with Oderberg, D.S., London: Macmillan: pp. 196–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. 1861 (1963–91). Utilitarianism, and On Liberty in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Gen. Ed. Robson, J.M.. 33 vols. University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasky, M. 2004 Olasky, M. Worldmag Nov. 27, 2004. www.worldmag.com/2004/11/blue_state_philosopherGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 2004. ‘Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation’, Feminist Economics 10, no. 3: 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J.J.C. 1973 ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’ in Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 1973. ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism’ in Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Wisnewski, J. 2007 ‘Murder, Cannibalism, and Indirect Suicide’, Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 14:1, pp. 11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar