Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:18:42.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part Two - Knowledges and Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

Edited by
Cecilia McCallum ,
Silvia Posocco  and
Martin Fotta
Cecilia McCallum
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil
Silvia Posocco
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Martin Fotta
Affiliation:
Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality , pp. 153 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Amit, V., ed. (2015). Thinking through Sociality: An Anthropological Interrogation of Key Concepts. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, E., Willett, C., and Meyers, D. (2020). Feminist perspectives on the self. In Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2020 edition, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/feminism-self/ (accessed October 5, 2020).Google Scholar
Bialecki, J., and Daswani, G. (2015). Introduction: what is an individual? The view from Christianity. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1), 271–94.Google Scholar
Boyce, P., Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ, and Posocco, S., eds. (2020). Queering Knowledge: Analytics, Devices and Investments after Marilyn Strathern. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Busby, C. (1997). Permeable and partible persons: a comparative analysis of gender and body in South India and Melanesia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3(2), 261–78.Google Scholar
Busby, C. (2000). The Performance of Gender: An Anthropology of Everyday Life in a South Indian Fishing Village. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Cacho, L. M. (2012). Social Death: Racialized Rightlessness and the Criminalization of the Unprotected. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2004). After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (2019). Racial politics of frozen embryo personhood in the US antiabortion movement. Transforming Anthropology, 27(1), 22–36.Google Scholar
De la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: conceptual reflections beyond “politics.” Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Matos Viegas, S. (2012). Pleasures that differentiate: transformational bodies among the Tupinambá of Olivença (Atlantic coast, Brazil). The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(3), 536–53.Google Scholar
Descola, P. (2001). The genres of gender: local models and global paradigms in the comparison of Amazonia and Melanesia. In Gregor, T. A. and Tuzin, D., eds., Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An Exploration of the Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (2001 [1912]). Introduction. In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (2014). Undoing kinship. In Freeman, T., Graham, S., and Ebtehaj, F., eds., Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewart, E. (2013). Space and Society in Central Brazil: A Panará Ethnography. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (1991). Fetal fascinations: new dimensions to the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood. In Franklin, S., Lury, C., and Stacey, J., eds., Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 190–205.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldman, M. (1996). Uma categoria do pensamento antropológico: A noção de pessoa. Revista de Antropologia, 39(1), 83–109.Google Scholar
Green, S. (2017). Conclusion: thinking through proliferations of geometries, fractions and parts. In Lebner, A., ed., Redescribing Relations: Strathernian Conversations on Ethnography, Knowledge and Politics. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, C. (2015 [1982]). Gifts and Commodities, 2nd ed. Chicago: Hau Books.Google Scholar
Harris, O. (1981). Households as natural units. In Young, K., Wolkowitz, C., and McCullagh, R., eds., Of Marriage and the Market: Women’s Subordination in International Perspective. London: CSE, pp. 49–68.Google Scholar
Hernández Castillo, R. A. (2010). The emergence of indigenous feminism in Latin America. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35(3), 539–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, S. (2006). Strathern’s Melanesian “dividual” and the Christian “individual”: a perspective from Vanua Lava, Vanuatu. Oceania, 76(3), 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. (2014). Melanesian ethnography and the comparative project of anthropology: reflection on Strathern’s analogical approach. Theory, Culture and Society, 31(2–3), 39–64.Google Scholar
Hirschon, R., ed. (1984). Woman and Property, Women as Property. London: CroomHelm.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (1996). Introduction. 1989 debate “The concept of society is theoretically obsolete.” In Ingold, T., ed., Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 57–9.Google Scholar
Jolly, M. (2018). Gender and personhood (individual, dividual). In Callan, H., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kensinger, K. (1995). How Real People Ought to Live: The Cashinahua of Eastern Peru. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Kopenawa, D., and Albert, B. (2013). The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lagrou, E. (1998). Cashinahua cosmovision: a perspectival approach to identity and alterity. PhD thesis, University of St. Andrews. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1676 (accessed November 25, 2020).Google Scholar
Lea, V. (2012). Riquezas Intangíveis de Pessoas Partíveis: Os Mẽbêngôkre (Kayapó) do Brasil Central. São Paulo: Edusp.Google Scholar
Lea, V. R., and Kayapo, M. P. (2020). Indagações a respeito das transformações na vida das mulheres Mẽbêngôkre. In Miranda, M., da Cruz Borges, Á. A., Santana, A. C., and Sousa, S. A., eds., Línguas e Culturas Macro-Jê: Saberes Entrecruzados. Barra do Garças, MT: GEDELLI/UFMT, pp. 95–118.Google Scholar
Leacock, E. B. (1981). Myths of Male Domination: Collected Articles on Women Cross-Culturally. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Lebner, A. (2017). Introduction: Strathern’s redescription of anthropology. In Lebner, A., ed., Redescribing Relations: Strathernian Conversations on Ethnography, Knowledge and Politics. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Long, N. J., and Moore, H. L., eds. (2013). Sociality: New Directions. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1985). Conclusion. In Collins, S. and Carrithers, M., eds., The Category of the Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282–301.Google Scholar
MacCormack, C., and Strathern, M., eds. (1980). Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madi Dias, D. (2018). O parentesco transviado, exemplo guna (Panamá). Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad: Revista Latinoamericana, 29, 25–51.Google Scholar
Marriot, M. (1976). Hindu transactions: diversity without dualism. In Kapferer, B., ed., Transaction and Meaning Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1985 [1938]). A category of the human mind: the notion of person; the notion of self. Trans. Halls, W. D.. In Collins, S. and Carrithers, M., eds., The Category of the Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (1996). The body that knows: from Cashinahua epistemology to a medical anthropology of Lowland South America. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 10, 347–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCallum, C. (1999). Consuming pity: the production of death among the Cashinahua. Cultural Anthropology, 14(4), 443–71.Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (2001). Gender and Sociality in Amazonia: How Real People Are Made. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (2009). Becoming a real woman: alterity and the embodiment of Cashinahua gendered identity. Tipiti, 7, 43–66.Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (2020). Making ecumenes: ontogeny, amity, and resistance in Brazilian indigenous pathways. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 26(3), 575–93.Google Scholar
McKittrick, K., ed. (2015). Sylvia Wynter: On Being Human as Praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. M. (1996). Fetal relationality in feminist philosophy: an anthropological critique. Hypatia, 11(3), 47–70.Google Scholar
Morgan, L M., and Michaels, M. W. (1999). Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Overing, J. (1986). Men control women? The “catch 22” in the analysis of gender. International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 1(2), 135–56.Google Scholar
Peletz, M. (1995). Kinship studies in late twentieth century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchesky, R. (1987). Fetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies, 13(2), 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pina-Cabral, J. (2016). Brazilian serialities: personhood and radical embodied cognition. Current Anthropology, 57(3), 247–60.Google Scholar
Pina-Cabral, J. (2017). World: An Anthropological Examination. Chicago: Hau Books.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. (1980). The use and abuse of anthropology: reflections on feminism and cross-cultural understanding. Signs, 5(3), 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: notes on the “political economy” of sex. In Reiter, R. R., ed. Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157–210.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (2012). What Kinship Is – And Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seeger, A., Da Matta, R., and Viveiros de Castro, E. (2019 [1979]). The construction of the person in indigenous Brazilian societies. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 9(3), 694–703.Google Scholar
Sieder, R. (2017). Introduction: demanding justice and security: Indigenous women and legal pluralities in Latin America. In Sieder, R., ed., Demanding Justice and Security: Indigenous Women and Legal Pluralities in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Sillander, K., and Remme, J. H. Z. (2017). Introduction: extended sociality and the social life of humans. In Remme, J. H. Z. and Sillander, K., eds., Human Nature and Social Life: Perspectives on Extended Sociality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1992). After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1996). For the motion (1). 1989 debate “The concept of society is theoretically obsolete.” In Ingold, T., ed., Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 60–6.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1999). Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (2005). Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. (2018). Persons and partible persons. In Candea, M., ed., Schools and Styles of Anthropological Theory. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, pp. 236–46.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (2020). Relations: An Anthropological Account. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M., and Arslan, O. (2018). On the partible person, the relational individual and the multiplicities of kinship. Interview with Marilyn Strathern. https://stsistanbul.org/2018/06/20/on-the-partible-person-the-relational-individual-and-the-multiplicities-of-kinship-marilyn-strathern/ (accessed May 21, 2020).Google Scholar
Strathern, M., and Macfarlane, A. (2009). Marilyn Strathern interviewed by Alan Macfarlane, May 6, 2009. Available at www.alanmacfarlane.com/ancestors/strathern2.htm (accessed April 19, 2020).Google Scholar
Street, A., and Copeman, J. (2014). Social theory after Strathern: an introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(2–3), 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toren, C. (1996). For the motion (2). 1989 debate “The concept of society is theoretically obsolete.” In Ingold, T., ed., Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 72–6.Google Scholar
Toren, C. (1999). Mind, Materiality and History: Explorations in Fijian Ethnography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toren, C. (2013). Imagining the world that warrants our imagination: the revelation of ontogeny. In Long, N. J. and Moore, H., eds., Sociality: New Directions. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
Toren, C. (2017). The evanescence of experience and how to capture it. In Remme, J. H. Z and Sillander, K., eds., Human Nature and Social Life: Perspectives on Extended Sociality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. (2013). More-than-human sociality: a call for critical description. In Hastrup, K., ed., Anthropology and Nature. London: Routledge, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012 [1999]). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books and University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Vilaça, A. (2005). Chronically unstable bodies: reflections on Amazonian corporalities. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(3), 445–64.Google Scholar
Vilaça, A. (2011). Dividuality in Amazonia: God, the devil, and the constitution of personhood in Wari’ Christianity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(2), 243–62.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1996). Society. In Barnard, A. and Spencer, J., eds., Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 774–85.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–88.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2001). GUT feelings about Amazonia: potential affinity and the construction of sociality. In Rival, L. and Whitehead, N., eds., Beyond the Visible and the Material: The Amerindianization of Society in the Work of Peter Riviere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Wade, P. (2002). Race, Nature and Culture: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (1975). The Invention of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (1977). Analogic kinship: a Daribi example. American Ethnologist, 4, 623–42.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (1991). The fractal person. In Strathern, M. and Godelier, M., eds., Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Editions de la Maison de Sciences des Hommes, pp. 159–73.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1992 [1792]). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. With Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wynter, S. (1994). “No humans involved”: an open letter to my colleagues. Forum N.H.I., 1(1), 42–73.Google Scholar

References

Asad, T., ed. (1973). Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ed. (1995). Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berger, A. E. (2014). The Queer Turn in Feminism: Identities, Sexualities, and the Theater of Gender New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Besnier, N. (1997). Sluts and superwomen: the politics of gender liminality in urban Tonga. Ethnos, 61(1–2), 5–31.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2005). The Gay Archipelago: Sexuality and Nation in Indonesia Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2007). Queer studies in the house of anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 17–36.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J., and Scott, J. W., eds. (1992). Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (1995). The substance of kinship and the heat of the hearth: feeding, personhood, and relatedness among Malays in Pulau Langkawi. American Ethnologist, 22(2), 223–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. (1997). The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. A., and Carver, T. (2008). Judith Butler and Political Theory: Troubling Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1983). On ethnographic authority. Representations, 1(2), 118–46.Google Scholar
Clifford, J., and Marcus, G. E., eds. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collier, J. F., and Yanagisako, S. J., eds. (1987). Gender and Kinship: Essays toward and Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, D. H., and Frost, S., eds. (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. (1989 [1952]). The Second Sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
del Valle, T., ed. (1993). Gendered Anthropology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1977). Signature, event, context. Trans. Weber, Samuel and Mehlman, Jeffrey. Glyph, 1, 172–97.Google Scholar
di Leonardo, M., ed. (1991). Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (2000). Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Franklin, S., Hirsch, E., and Price, F., eds. (1999). Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eloit, I. (2018). Lesbian trouble: feminism, heterosexuality, and the French nation (1970–1981). Doctoral thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1973 [1884]). The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. London: Lawrence and Wishard.Google Scholar
Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Firestone, S. (1974). The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1974). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1987). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. London: Peregrine Books.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, S., and Ragone, H., eds. (1998). Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Friedan, B. (1992 [1963]). The Feminine Mystique. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1989). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Green, S. (1997). Urban Amazons: Lesbian Feminism and beyond in the Gender, Sexuality and Identity Battles of London. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–99.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Harding, S. G. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. G., ed. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hemmings, C. (2006). The life and times of academic feminism. In Davis, K., Evans, M., and Lorber, J., eds, Handbook of Gender and Women’s Studies. London: Sage, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar
Hemmings, C. (2011). Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Herdt, G., ed. (1993). Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. (1989). The Politics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. (1974). Speculum de l’autre femme. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Jagger, G. (2008). Judith Butler: Sexual Politics, Social Change and the Power of the Performative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jagose, A. (1996). Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Karhu, S. (2017). From violence to resistance: Judith Butler’s critique of norms. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kollontai, A. M. (1977 [1922]). Selected Writings of Alexandra Kollontai. Trans. Holt, Alix. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Kornak, J. (2014). Queer as a political concept. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. (1998). Travesti: Sex, Gender, and Culture among Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1983). Anthropology and Anthropologists: The Modern British School. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1988). The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leach, E. (1982). Social Anthropology. London: Fontana Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1972). The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Lienhardt, R. G. (1961). Divinity and Experience: The Religion of the Dinka. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. (1984). The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (2007). Judith Butler: From Norms to Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Loizidou, E. (2007). Judith Butler: Ethics, Law, Politics. London: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
Lykke, N., ed. (2010). Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F., and Thébaud, J.-L. (1985). Just Gaming. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
MacCormack, C., and Strathern, M., eds. (1989). Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1935). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1943). Coming of Age in Samoa: A Study of Adolescence and Sex in Primitive Societies. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Millett, K. (1971). Sexual Politics. New York: Avon BooksGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. (1971). Woman’s Estate. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Morris, R. C. (1995). All made up: performance-theory and the new anthropology of sex and gender. Annual Review of Anthropology 24, 567–92.Google Scholar
Nash, J. (1997). When isms become wasms: structural functionalism, Marxism, feminism and postmodernism, Critique of Anthropology 17(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
Newton, E. (1972). Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Newton, E. (2000). Margaret Mead Made Me Gay: Personal Essays, Public Ideas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, L. J., ed. (1990). Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, G. (1992). The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking in the Pacific. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (1984). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Rosaldo, M. Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., Woman, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 67–87.Google Scholar
Pulkkinen, T. (2000). The Postmodern and Political Agency. Jyväskylä: SoPhi.Google Scholar
Pulkkinen, T. (2009). Tradition, gender and democracy to come – Derrida on fraternity. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual Change and Feminist Theory, 13(1), 103–24.Google Scholar
Pulkkinen, T. (2015). Identity and intervention: transdisciplinarity and disciplinarity in gender studies. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(5–6), 183–205.Google Scholar
Pulkkinen, T. (2016). Feelings of injustice: the institutionalization of gender studies and the pluralization of feminism. differences: a Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 27(2), 103–24.Google Scholar
Rich, A. (1995 [1976]). Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Riley, D. (1988). Am I That Name?: Feminism and the Category of “Women” in History. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robcis, C. (2013). The Law of Kinship: Anthropology, Psychoanalysis, and the Family in France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: notes on the political economy of sex. In Reiter, R., ed., Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157–210.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. M. (1984). A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1986). Gender: a useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–75.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17(4), 773–97.Google Scholar
Scott, J. W., ed. (2008). Women’s Studies on the Edge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sorainen, A. (2019). How the inheritance system thinks: queering kinship, gender and care in the legal sphere. In Agha, P., ed., Law, Politics and the Gender Binary. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1993). Foundations and cultural studies. In Silverman, H. J., ed., Questioning Foundations: Truth, Subjectivity, Culture. New York: Routledge, pp. 153–75.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. (1983). The ethnographer’s magic: fieldwork in British anthropology from Tyler to Malinowski. In Stocking, G. W., ed., Observers Observed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 70–120.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. (1999). Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1981). Culture in a netbag: the manufacture of a subdiscipline in anthropology. Man (n.s.), 16, 665–88.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. J. (1990). Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuin, I. v. d. (2015). Generational Feminism: New Materialist Introduction to a Generative Approach. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Turner, W. B. (2000). A Genealogy of Queer Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, M., ed. (1993). Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B. (1976). Women of Value, Men of Reknown. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weston, K. (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weston, K. (1993). Do clothes make the woman? Gender, performance-theory, and lesbian eroticism. Genders, 17, 1–21.Google Scholar
Wiegman, R. (2003). Women’s Studies on Its Own: A Next Wave Reader in Institutional Change. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wiegman, R. (2012). Object Lessons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wittig, M. (1992). The Straight Mind and Other Essays. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R. (1982). Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (1992). A Thrice-Told Tale: Feminism, Postmodernism, and Ethnographic Responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1929). A Room of One’s Own. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Atanga, L. L. (2013). African feminism? In Atanga, L. L., Ellece, S. E., Litosseliti, L. and Sunderland, J., eds., Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa. Tradition, Struggle and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 301–14.Google Scholar
Atanga, L. L., Ellece, S. E., Litosseliti, L., and Sunderland, J., eds. (2013). Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa: Tradition, Struggle and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2002). Polari: The Lost Language of Gay Men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrett, R. (1997). The “homo-genius” speech community. In Livia, A. and Hall, K., eds., Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2015). Gender in a North African setting. In Smakman, D. and Heinrich, P., eds, Globalising Sociolinguistics: Challenging and Expanding Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 123–36.Google Scholar
Bauman, R., and Briggs, C. L. (2003). Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. (1988). Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. (1992). “Since I am a woman, I will chastise my relatives”: gender, reported speech, and the (re)production of social relations in Warao ritual wailing. American Ethnologist, 19(2), 337–61.Google Scholar
Buchholz, M. (2014). The feminist foundations of language, gender and sexuality research. In Ehrlich, S., Holmes, J., and Meyerhoff, M., The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
Buchholtz, M., and Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In Duranti, A., ed., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 369–93.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cage, K. (2003). Gayle: The Language of Kinks and Queens: A History and Dictionary of Gay Language in South Africa. Johannesburg: Jacana Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1998). A Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2007). The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., and Kulick, D. (2003). Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., and Kulick, D. (2006). The Language and Sexuality Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coates, J., and Pichler, P., eds. (2011). Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South or, How Euro-America Is Evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–99.Google Scholar
de Kadt, E. (2004). Gender aspects of the use of English on a South African university campus. World Englishes, 23, 515–54.Google Scholar
Dowling, T. (1988). Isihlonipho Sabafazi: The Xhosa women’s language of respect. A sociolinguistic exploration. Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (2001). Linguistic anthropology: history, ideas and issues. In Duranti, A., ed., Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Eckert, P., and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S., Holmes, J., and Meyerhoff, M. (2014). The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Epprecht, M. (2004). Hungochani: A History of Dissident Sexuality in Southern Africa. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Epprecht, M. (2010). The making of “African sexuality”: Early sources, current debates. History Compass, 8(8), 768–79.Google Scholar
Errington, J. (2007). Linguistics in a Colonial World: A Story of Language, Meaning, and Power. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Finlayson, R. (1978). A preliminary survey of hlonipha among the Xhosa. Taalfasette, 24(2), 48–63.Google Scholar
Finlayson, R. (2002). Women’s language of respect: “Isihlonipho sabafazi.” In Mesthrie, R., ed., Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Gal, S., Irvine, J. T., and Kroskrity, P. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P., ed., Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–84.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. M., and Gubar, S. (1985). Sexual linguistics: gender, language, sexuality. New Literary History, 16(3), 515–43.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She Said: Talk as a Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (1995). Lip service on the fantasy lines. In Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K., eds., Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York: Routledge, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar
Hall, K., and Buchholtz, M. (1995). Gender Articulated. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanong Thetela, P. (2002). Sex discourses and gender constructions in southern Sotho: a case study of police interviews of rape/sexual assault victims. South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 20(3), 177–89.Google Scholar
Harrison, A., and Montgomery, E. (2001). Life histories, reproductive histories: rural South African women’s narratives of fertility, reproductive health and illness. Journal of South African Studies, 27(2), 311–28.Google Scholar
Herbert, R. (1990). “Hlonipha” and the ambiguous woman. Anthropos, 85, 455–73.Google Scholar
Hlatswayo, V., and Mutumen, G. (1998). Investors and royal activists: a new women’s Southern Africa. WIN: Women’s International Net, 12A, 1–14.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., and Meyerhoff, M. (2005). Different voices, different views: an introduction to current research on language and gender. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Hurst, E. (2009). Tsotsitaal, global culture and local style: identity and recontextualisation in twenty-first century South African townships. Social Dynamics, 35(2), 244–57.Google Scholar
Hurst, E., and Buthelezi, M. (2014). A visual and linguistic comparison of features of Durban and Cape Town Tsotsitaals. South African Linguistics of Applied Language Studies, 32(2), 185–97.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–92.Google Scholar
Hyde, Jane S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–98.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1989). Ways of speaking. In Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J., eds., Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 433–51.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Towards an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Ige, B., and de Kadt, E. (2002). Gendering politeness: Zulu-speakers identities at the University of Natal, Durban. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2(3), 147–60.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T., and Gunner, L., (2018). With respect to Zulu: revisiting ukuhlonipha. Anthropological Quarterly, 91(1), 173–207.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., and Marcellino, W. (2010). Dell Hymes and the Ethnography of Communication. Available at http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=English (accessed August 17, 2016).Google Scholar
Kramer, E. (2016). Feminist linguistics and linguistic feminism. In Lewin, E. and Silverstein, L. M., eds., Mapping Feminist Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. (1997). The gender of Brazilian transgendered prostitutes. American Anthropologist, New Series, 99(3), 574–85.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. (1998). Travesti: Sex, Gender and Culture among Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, D. (2000). Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 243–85.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (1995). Beyond the Lavender Lexicon. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (1996). Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (2004). Language, belonging and (homo)sexual citizenship in Cape Town, South Africa. In Leap, W. L. and Boellstorff, T., eds., Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 134–62.Google Scholar
Leap, W., and Boellstorff, T. (2004). Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Leap, W., and Motschenbacher, H. (2012). Launching a new phase in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 1(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
LeClerk-Madlala, S. (2001). Demonising women in the era of AIDS: on the relationship between cultural constructions of both HIV/AIDS and femininity. Society in Transition, 32(1), 38–46.Google Scholar
Levon, E. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295–308.Google Scholar
Levon, E., and Mendes, R. B., eds. (2016). Language, Sexuality and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, E. (2006). Feminist Anthropology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Livia, A., and Hall, K., eds. (1997). Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magwaza, T. (2008). “So that I will be a marriagable girl”: Umemulo in Contemporary Zulu society. In Carton, B., Laband, J., and Sithole, J., eds., Zulu Identities: Being Zulu, Past and Present. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, pp. 482–96.Google Scholar
Mathonsi, N., and Gumede, M. (2006). Communicating through performance: Izigiyo Zawomame as gendered protest texts. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 24(4), 483–94.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. (2011). Gender, Sexuality, and Meaning: Linguistic Practice and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McElhinny, B. (2005). Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar
McLean, H., and Ngcobo, L. (1995). “Abangibhamayo bathi ngimnandi” (those who fuck me say I’m tasty): gay sexuality in Reef townships. In Gevisser, M. and Cameron, E., eds., Defiant Desire: Gay and Lesbian Lives in South Africa. New York: Routledge, pp. 158–85.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., and Slatcher, R. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82.Google Scholar
Milani, T. (2015). Sexual citizenship: discourse, spaces and bodies at Joburg Pride 2012. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(3), 431–54.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2010). Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, H. (2007). Can the term “genderlect” be saved? A postmodernist redefinition. Gender and Language, 1(2), 255–78.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, H. (2010). Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Msibi, T. (2013). Homophobic language and linguistic resistance in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. In Atanga, L. L, Ellece, S. E., Litosseliti, L., and Sunderland, J., eds., Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 253–74.Google Scholar
Msibi, T., and Rudwick, S. (2015). Intersections of two isiZulu genderlects and the construction of skesana identities. Stellenbosch Paper in Linguistics Plus, 46, 51–66.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O., and Roscoe, W. (1998). Boy-Wives and Female Husbands. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ntuli, N. (2009). IsiNgqumo: exploring origins, growth and sociolinguistics of a Nguni urban-township homosexual sub-culture. MA thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal.Google Scholar
Ouzgane, L., and Morell, R. (1998). African Masculinities: Men in Africa from the Late Nineteenth Century to the Present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Parmegiani, A. (2017). Gender and the ownership of English in South Africa. World Englishes, 36(1), 42–59.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., and Makoni, S. (2020). Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics from the Global South. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Povinelli, E. (2006). Intimate grammars: anthropological and psycho-analytical accounts of language, gender and desire. In Jourdan, C. and Tuite, K., eds., Language, Culture and Society: Key Topics in Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 190–206.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Maybin, J., and Roberts, C. (2015). Theory and method in linguistic ethnography. In Snell, J., Shaw, S., and Copland, F., eds., Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 14–50.Google Scholar
Ratele, K. (2009). Violence and injuries in South Africa: prioritizing an agenda for prevention. The Lancet, 375, 1011–22.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (2005). Same-Sex Cultures and Sexualities: An Anthropological Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S. (2004). “Zulu – we need [it] for our culture”: Umlazi adolescents in the post-apartheid state. South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 22(3), 159–72.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S. (2005). Township language dynamics: isiZulu and isiTsotsi in Umlazi. South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 23(3), 57–65.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S. (2013). Gendered linguistic choices among isiZulu-speaking women in contemporary South Africa. In Atanga, L. L., Ellece, S., Litosseliti, L., and Sunderland, J., eds., Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 233–52.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S., and Makoni, S. (2021). Southernizing and decolonising the sociology of language: African scholarship matters. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–8, 259–63.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S., and Msibi, T. (2016). Social and linguistic representations of South African same-sex relations. In Levon, E. and Mendes, R. B., eds., Language, Sexuality and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–59.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S., Nkomo, K., and Shange, M. (2006). Ulimi lwenkululeko: township “women’s language of empowerment” and homosexual linguistic identities. Agenda, 6, 57–65.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S., and Ntuli, N. (2008). IsiNgqumo: introducing a gay Black South African linguistic variety. Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 26(4), 445–56.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S., and Posel, D. (2015). Zulu bridewealth (ilobolo) and womanhood in South Africa. Social Dynamics, 41(2), 289–306.Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie (1993). Preparing ourselves for power. Southern African Report 9(2), 13.Google Scholar
Sigamoney, V., and Epprecht, M. (2013). Meanings of homosexuality, same-sex sexuality, and African-ness in two South African townships: an evidence-based approach for rethinking same-sex prejudice. African Studies Review, 56(2), 83–107.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1985). Language and the culture of gender: at the intersection of structure, usage and ideology. In Merty, E. and Parmentier, R., eds., Semiotic Meditation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 219–59.Google Scholar
Smakman, D., and Heinrich, P., eds. (2015). Globalising Sociolinguistics. Challenging and Expanding Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spender, D. (1981). Man Made Language. New York: Pandora Books.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Swann, J. (2005). Schooled language: language and gender in educational settings. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 624–44.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1991). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Vilakazi, A. (1962). Zulu Transformations. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In Fox, R. G., ed., Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 137–62.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, N. J. (1998). The category of substance: a Maussian theme revisited. In James, W. and Allen, N. J., eds., Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 175–91.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, S. de. (1961). A History of Sex. London: New English Library.Google Scholar
Biswas, D. (2013). Ritual objects and ritualized bodies within Lai Haraoba. In Channa, S. M. and Misra, K. K., eds., Gendering Material Culture: Representation and Practice. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, pp. 183–98.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1992). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (1991). Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandenstein, C. G. von. (1977). Aboriginal ecological order in the south-west of Australia: meanings and examples. Oceania, 47(3), 170–86.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Channa, S. M. (2009). Global economy and constructed social imagination: intersection of aesthetics, race, gender and caste in South Asia. In Nas, P., Shi-yuan, H., and Xiao-min, Z., eds., Keynotes in Anthropology. Book Series of 16th World Congress of IUAES. China, pp. 84–100.Google Scholar
Channa, S. M. (2013a). The Inner and Outer Selves: Cosmology, Gender and Ecology at the Himalayan Borders. New Delhi: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Channa, S. M. (2013b). Gender in South Asia: Social Imagination and Constructed Realities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Channa, S. M. (2017). Selves and codified bodies. In Coleman, S., Kingsolver, A., and Hyatt, S. B., eds., The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology. New York: Routledge, pp. 219–33.Google Scholar
Channa, S. M. (2018). Understanding caste through an anthropological lens. In History of Ancient India – VI, Social, Political and Judicial Ideas, Institutions and Practices. New Delhi: Vivekananda International Foundation and Aryan Books International, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, R. K. (2018). The caste system of ancient India: a study of literary and epigraphic sources. In Chakrabarti, D. K., ed., Social, Political and Judicial Ideas, Institutions and Practices. New Delhi: Aryan Books International and the Vivekananda International Foundation, pp. 43–135.Google Scholar
Chinmayananda, S. (1993). Vishnu-Narayana. In Nitryananda, S., ed., Symbolism in Hinduism. Bombay: Central Chinmaya Mission Trust, pp. 96–102.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2007). Life and Words. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A. (2011). Women, Race and Class. New Delhi: Navayana (South Asia edition).Google Scholar
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. (1973). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1980). Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1915). Elementary Forms of the Religious Life: A Study in Religious Sociology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1976). The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2006). The body of the condemned. In Moore, T. and Moore, H., eds., Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 352–6.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1947). The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion, one-volume abridged edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1993). Introduction: Eurocentric scientific illiteracy – a challenge for the world community. In Harding, S., ed., The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. (1999). Globalization and the trade in human body parts. Canadian Review of Sociology, 36(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
Inden, R. B. (1976). Marriage and Rank in Bengali Culture: A History of Caste and Clan in Middle Period Bengal. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. (2006). Knowledge of the body. In Moore, H. L. and Sanders, T., eds., Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 322–35.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. (2016 [1957]). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lambek, M. (1998). The Sakalava protests of history: realizing the past through spirit possession in Madagascar. American Ethnologist, 25(2), 106–27.Google Scholar
Lambek, M. (2006). Body and mind in mind, body and mind in body: some anthropological interventions in a long conversation. In Moore, H. L. and Sanders, T., eds., Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 424–36.Google Scholar
MacCormack, C. P., and Strathern, M., eds. (1980). Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madhavananda, S. (1958). A bird’s eye view of the Upanisads. In The Cultural Heritage of India, vol. 1: The Early Phase. Calcutta: Ramakrishna Institute of Culture, pp. 345–66.Google Scholar
Martin, E. (1987). The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: how science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. Signs, 16(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
Martin, E. (2006). The end of the body? In Moore, H. L. and Sanders, T., eds., Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 336–51.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1936). Les techniques du corps. Journal de la Psychologie, 32, 271–93.Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (2016). Trustworthy bodies: Cashinahua cumulative persons as intimate others. In Broch-Due, V. and Ystanes, M., eds., Trusting and Its Tribulations: Inter Disciplinary Engagements with Intimacy, Sociality and Trust. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 191–212.Google Scholar
Nanda, S. (1999 [1990]). Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Nichter, M., and Nichter, M. (1983). The ethnophysiology and folk diectics of pregnancy: a case study from South India. Human Organization, 42(3), 235–46.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (1972). Is female to male as nature is to culture? Feminist Studies, 1(2), 5–31.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. (2006). So is female to male as nature is to culture?. In Moore, H. L. and Sanders, T., eds., Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 437–42.Google Scholar
Padel, F. (2011 [1995]). Sacrificing People: Invasions of the Tribal Landscape. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
Rae, G. (2016). The political significance of the face: Deleuze’s critique of Levinas. Critical Horizons, 17(3–4), 279–303.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2000). The global trade in human organs. Current Anthropology, 41(2), 1–59.Google Scholar
Spillers, H. J. (1987). Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe: an American grammar book. Diacritics, 17(2), 64–81.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (1994). A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2006). Complex deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. In Moore, H. L. and Sanders, T., eds., Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 552–65.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Ahearn, L. (2012). Conclusion: language, power and agency. In Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 259–91.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatus (Notes toward an investigation). In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 127–86.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, P., and Balirano, G., eds. (2018). Queering Masculinities in Language and Culture. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baker, S. J. (1939). Fighting for Life. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bullock, P. (2016). Transcript: Billy Bush conversation with Donald Trump, www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html (accessed January 29, 2019).Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1991). Imitation and gender insubordination. In Fuss, D., ed., Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories. New York: Routledge, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). Introduction. In The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Campbell, B., and Haynes, N., eds. (2020). Constructing the digital self in the global south. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 9(1), 1–95.Google Scholar
Cashman, H. (2018). Queer, Latinx, and Bilingual: Narrative Resources in the Negotiation of Identities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–99.Google Scholar
Dinshaw, C. (2012). How Soon Is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, L. (2003). The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Eng, D. L., with Halberstam, J., and Muñoz, J. (2005). Introduction: what’s queer about queer studies now? Social Text, 84–5, 1–18.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. A. (2004). Aberrations in Black. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Flannery, R. (1946). Men’s and women’s speech in Gros Ventre. International Journal of American Linguistics, 12, 133–5.Google Scholar
Gerdes, K. (2015). Performativity. TransGender Quarterly, 1(1–2), 148–50.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J., and Menon, M. (2005). Queering history. PMLA, 120(5), 1608–17.Google Scholar
Gramling, D. (2016). The Invention of Monolingualism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. (1998). An introduction to female masculinity: masculinity without men. In Female Masculinity: Masculinity without Men. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. (2005). Queer temporality and post-modern geographies. In In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (1999). Performativity. Journal of Anthropological Linguistics, 9(1–2), 184–7.Google Scholar
Haynes, N. (2020). “Overloaded like a Bolivian truck”: discursive constructions of gender, race, and nationalism in northern Chilean memes. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 9(1), 69–92.Google Scholar
Henry, T. (2020). Introduction: queer Korea: toward a field of engagement. In Henry, T., ed., Queer Korea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M., ed., The New Psychology of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 155–75.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (2001). The man-monster. In Love Stories: Sex between Men before Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
Lait, J., and Mortimer, L. (1951). Washington Confidential. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Lane, N. (2019). The Black Queer Work of Ratchet: Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the (Anti)Politics of Respectability. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (2007). Performative effect in three gay English texts. In Livia, A. and Hall, K., eds., Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 310–24.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (2015). Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H., and Schifrin, D., eds., The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 661–80.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (2016). Language, sexuality, heteroglossia and intersectionality. In Bonvillain, N., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. New York: Routledge, pp. 117–90.Google Scholar
Leap, W. (2020). Language before Stonewall. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Livia, A., and Hall, K. (1997). “It’s a girl”: bringing performativity back to linguistics. In Livia, A. and Hall, K., eds., Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Loughery, J. (1998). The Other Side of Silence. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
McIlvenny, P. (2002). Critical reflections on performativity and the “un/doing” of gender and sexuality in talk. In McIlvenny, P., ed., Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 111–50.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, N. (2008). Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Menon, M. (2015). Universalism and partition: a queer theory. Differences, 26 (1), 117–40.Google Scholar
Milani, T., ed. (2015). Language and Masculinities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, H. (2010). Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, H. (2013). Taking queer linguistics further: sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 212, 149–79.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nash, J. (2008). Rethinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 98, 1–15.Google Scholar
Newton, E. (1972). Mother Camp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newton, E. (1984). The mythic mannish lesbian: Radclyffe Hall and the new woman. Signs, 9(4), 557–75.Google Scholar
Pêcheux, M. (1982 [1975]). The subject-form of discourse in the subjective appropriation of scientific knowledges and political practice. In Semantics and Ideology, trans. Harbans Nagpal. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 155–69.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2004). Performativity and language studies. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal, 1(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Provencher, D. (2017). QMF: Queer Maghrebi French. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. (2010). How do you say “come out of the closet” in Arabic? Queer activism and the politics of visibility in Israel-Palestine. GLQ, 16(4), 557–75.Google Scholar
Russell, E. (2019). The Discursive Ecology of Homophobia. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1916). Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture Change: A Study in Method. Ottawa: Canada Department of Mines, Geological Survey, Memoir 90, Anthropological Series 13.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. (1993a). Queer and now. In Tendencies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. (1993b). Queer performativity: Henry James’ The Art of the Novel. GLQ, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Snorton, C. R. (2017). Black on Both Sides: A Racial History of Trans Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. (1964). Notes on “camp.” Partisan Review, 31(4), 515–30.Google Scholar
Spillers, H. (1987). Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe: an American grammar book. Diacritics, 17(2), 64–81.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. (1982). “Male” and “female” speech in Gros Ventre. Anthropological Linguistics, 24(3), 301–7.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1977). Language. In Marxism and Literature. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
Williams, W. (1986). The Spirit and the Flesh: Sexual Diversity in American Indian Culture. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.Google Scholar
Zimman, L. 2014. The discursive construction of sex: remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. In Zimman, L., Davis, J. L., and Raclaw, J., eds., Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar
Zimman, L., Davis, J. L., and Raclaw, J., eds. (2014). Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Abu-Lughod, L. (2002). Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783–90.Google Scholar
Achilli, L. (2015). Becoming a man in Al-Wihdat: masculine performances in a Palestinian refugee camp in Jordan. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 47(2), 263–80.Google Scholar
Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613.Google Scholar
Allison, A. (1994). Nightwork: Sexuality, Pleasure, and Corporate Masculinity in a Tokyo Hostess Club. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Almeida, M. V. d. (1996). The Hegemonic Male: Masculinity in a Portuguese Town. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. R. O. G. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anthias, F., and Yuval-Davis, N. (1992). Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour, and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (1990). The third space. In Rutherford, J., ed., Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 207–37.Google Scholar
Blackwood, E. (1998). Tombois in West Sumatra: constructing masculinity and erotic desire. Cultural Anthropology, 13(4), 491–521.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2005). The Gay Archipelago: Sexuality and Nation in Indonesia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2007). Queer studies in the house of anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 17–35.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourgois, P. (1995). In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broughton, C., and Walton, T. (2006). Downsizing masculinity: gender, family, and fatherhood in post-industrial America. Anthropology of Work Review, 17(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. (2019). Symbolic Violence: Conversations with Bourdieu. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carrier, J. (1995). De Los Otros: Intimacy and Homosexuality among Mexican Men. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, A.-D., and Jensen, S. (2014). Combining masculinity and intersectionality. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(1), 60–75.Google Scholar
Connell, R. (2014). Margin becoming centre: for a world-centred rethinking of masculinities. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(4), 217–31.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (1985). Theorising gender. Sociology, 19(2), 260–72.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. (2016). Introduction: masculinities under neoliberalism. In Cornwall, A., Karioris, F., and Lindisfarne, N., eds., Masculinities under Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A., Karioris, F., and Lindisfarne, N., eds. (2016). Masculinities under Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A., and Lindisfarne, N. (1994a). Dislocating Masculinity: Comparative Ethnographies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A., and Lindisfarne, N. (1994b). Introduction. In Cornwall, A. and Lindisfarne, N., eds., Dislocating Masculinity. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Crossley, P., and Pease, B. (2009). Machismo and the construction of immigrant Latin American masculinities. In Donaldson, M., Hibbins, R., Howson, R., and Pease, B., eds., Migrant Men. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–34.Google Scholar
Duneier, M. (1992). Slim’s Table: Race, Respectability, and Masculinity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elliston, D. (1995). Erotic anthropology: “ritualized homosexuality” in Melanesia and beyond. American Ethnologist, 22(4), 848–67.Google Scholar
Elliston, D. (2004). A passion for the nation: masculinity, modernity, and nationalist struggle. American Anthropologist, 31(4), 606–30.Google Scholar
Enloe, C. (1990). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (2008 [1952]). Black Skin, White Masks. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Gamlin, J. B., and Hawkes, S. J. (2018). Masculinities on the continuum of structural violence: the case of Mexico’s homicide epidemic. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25(1), 50–71.Google Scholar
Ghoussub, M., and Sinclair-Webb, E. (2000). Imagined Masculinities: Male Identity and Culture in the Modern Middle East. London: Saqi.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. W. (1991). Feminist ideas about masculinity. American Quarterly, 43(1), 128–34.Google Scholar
Gill, L. (1997). Creating citizens, making men: the military and masculinity in Bolivia. Cultural Anthropology, 12(4), 527–50.Google Scholar
Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, A. (2014). On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M. C. (1997). Trafficking in men: the anthropology of masculinity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 385–409.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M. C. (2019). Are Men Animals? How Modern Masculinity Sells Men Short. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. (1998). Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: discourse and power. In Gieben, B. and Hall, S., eds., Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 275–332.Google Scholar
Harrington, D. C. (2020). What is “toxic masculinity” and why does it matter? Men and Masculinities, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hearn, J. (2015). Men of the World. Genders, Globalizations, Transnational Times. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Herdt, G. H. (1981). Guardians of the Flutes: Idioms of Masculinity: A Study of Ritualized Homosexual Behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (1985). The Poetics of Manhood: Contest and Identity in a Cretan Mountain Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
High, C. (2010). Warriors, hunters, and Bruce Lee: gendered agency and the transformation of Amazonian masculinity. American Anthropologist, 37(4), 753–70.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D. L. (1999). “Once intrepid warriors”: modernity and the production of Maasai masculinities. Ethnology, 38(2), 121–50.Google Scholar
Howe, C. (2015). Queer anthropology. In Smelser, N. J., ed., The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 19. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 752–58.Google Scholar
Howson, R. (2006). Challenging Hegemonic Masculinity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingvars, Á., and Gíslason, I. (2018). Moral mobility: emergent refugee masculinities among young Syrians in Athens. Men and Masculinities, 21(2), 383–402.Google Scholar
Kanaaneh, R. (2005). Boys or men? Duped or “made”? Palestinian soldiers in the Israeli military. American Ethnologist, 32(2), 260–75.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1991). Identity and its discontents: women and the nation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(3), 429–43.Google Scholar
Knauft, B. M. (1997). Gender identity, political economy and modernity in Melanesia and Amazonia. Source: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3(2), 233–59.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. (1998). Travesti: Sex, Gender, and Culture among Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lancaster, R. N. (1988). Subject honor and object shame: the construction of male homosexuality and stigma in Nicaragua. Ethnology, 27(2), 111–25.Google Scholar
Lin, X. (2016). “Filial son,” dislocated masculinity and the making of male migrant workers in urban China. In Cornwall, A., Karioris, F., and Lindisfarne, N., eds., Masculinities under Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books, pp. 66–79.Google Scholar
Manalisan IV, M. (2003). Global Divas: Filipino Gay Men in the Diaspora. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, J. W. (1994). Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualizations of Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mfecane, S. (2016). “Ndiyindoda” [I am a man]: theorising Xhosa masculinity. Anthropology Southern Africa, 39(3), 204–14.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1979). Male bias in anthropology. Man: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute n.s., 14(1), 40–54.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. (2015). Tourist Attractions: Performing Race and Masculinity in Brazil’s Sexual Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monterescu, D. (2006). Stranger masculinities: gender and politics in a Palestinian-Israeli third space. In Ouzgane, L., ed., Islamic Masculinities. London: Zed Books, pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Monterescu, D. (2007). Masculinity as a relational mode: Palestinian gender ideologies and working-class categorical boundaries in an ethnically mixed town. In Sufian, S. M. and LeVine, M., eds., Reapproaching Borders: New Perspectives on the Study of Israel/Palestine. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 177–98.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. (1990). Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. (1996). The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mullins, C. W. (2006). Holding Your Square: Masculinities, Streetlife and Violence. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O., and Roscoe, W., eds. (1997). Islamic Homosexualities: Culture, History, and Literature. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 4–27.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. (2003). Race, Ethnicity and Sexuality: Intimate Intersections, Forbidden Frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ouzgane, L., ed. (2006). Islamic Masculinities. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Parker, R. G. (1991). Bodies, Pleasures, and Passions: Sexual Culture in Contemporary Brazil. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Penglase, B. (2010). The owner of the hill: masculinity and drug-trafficking in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 15(2), 317–37.Google Scholar
Peteet, J. (1994). Male gender and rituals of resistance in the Palestinian Intifada: a cultural politics of violence. American Ethnologist, 21(1), 31–49.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. (2005). With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, R., ed. (1975). Introduction. In Reiter, R., ed., Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: notes on the “political economy” of sex. In Reiter, R., ed., Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157–210.Google Scholar
Scheibelhofer, P. (2016). “How would you react if you learned that your son was gay?” Racialized sexualities and the production of migrant others in Europe. In Amelina, A., Horvath, K., and Meeus, B., eds., An Anthology of Migration and Social Transformation. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 295–306.Google Scholar
Scheibelhofer, P. (2018). Der fremd-gemachte Mann: Konstruktionen von Männlichkeit in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scheper‐Hughes, N. (1983). Introduction: the problem of bias in androcentric and feminist anthropology. Women’s Studies, 10(2), 109–16.Google Scholar
Silverman, E. K. (2004 ). Anthropology and circumcision. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33(1), 419–45.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1971 [1908]). On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sinatti, G. (2013). Masculinities and intersectionality in migration: transnational Wolof migrants negotiating manhood and gendered family roles. In Truong, T.-D., Gasper, D., Handmaker, J., and Bergh, S., eds., Migration, Gender and Social Justice: Perspectives on Human Security. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 215–26.Google Scholar
Sinha, M. (1995). Colonial Masculinity: The “Manly Englishman” and the “Effeminate Bengali” in the Late Nineteenth Century. Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Soja, E. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. and Grossbern, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271–313.Google Scholar
Stephen, L. (2002). Sexualities and genders in Zapotec Oaxaca. Latin American Perspectives, 29(2), 41–59.Google Scholar
Waling, A. (2019). Problematising “toxic” and “healthy” masculinity for addressing gender inequalities. Australian Feminist Studies, 34(101), 362–75.Google Scholar
Ward, E. (2015). Not Gay: Sex between Straight White Men. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
West, C., and Zimmermann, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–51.Google Scholar
Whyte, W. F. (1947). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Young, A. (2000). Women Who Become Men: Albanian Sworn Virgins. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Knowledges and Domains
  • Edited by Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil, Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality
  • Online publication: 29 September 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647410.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Knowledges and Domains
  • Edited by Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil, Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality
  • Online publication: 29 September 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647410.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Knowledges and Domains
  • Edited by Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil, Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality
  • Online publication: 29 September 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647410.007
Available formats
×