Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T09:06:01.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - A New Generation of Worker Cooperatives

from Part IV - Enterprise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2024

By
Joan S. M. Meyers ,
Sanjay Pinto ,
Laura Hanson Schlachter  and
Olga Prushinskaya
Edited by
Brian D. Christens
Brian D. Christens
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Get access

Summary

Worker cooperatives – enterprises owned and operated by their employees – offer the potential for workplace socioeconomic empowerment. Historically they have struggled to capture a significant share of employment in the US and to be fully inclusive of communities confronting the greatest social and economic marginalization. Since the Great Recession, however, worker cooperatives have shown strong growth, with increasing representation from BIPOC, working-class, and immigrant communities. This chapter compares two home care worker cooperatives to discuss the benefits that worker cooperatives bring and some of the challenges they face. One, Golden Steps, operates at the small scale typical of most of the newer worker cooperatives, while the other, Cooperative Home Care Associates, is currently the largest worker cooperative in the US. Focusing on the financial, social, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and labor dimensions of worker cooperatives, we consider the important role of worker ownership and control within broader discussions of individual and community empowerment.

Keywords

care workdiversity, equity, and inclusionsolidarity economyworker cooperativesworker ownershipworkplace democracy
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Community Empowerment , pp. 415 - 437
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alperovitz, G. (2011). The new-economy movement. The Nation 292(24), 20–24.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, G., Howard, T., & Williamson, T. (2010). The Cleveland model. The Nation, 290(8), 21–24.Google Scholar
Alvarez, A. (2017). Lawyers, organizers, and workers: Collaboration and conflict in worker cooperative development. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 24(3), 353–380.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Arvins, J., Larcom, M., & Weissbourd, J. (2018). New forms of worker voice in the 21st century. Harvard Kennedy School of Government and MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/shared/ods/documents?DocumentID=4475Google Scholar
Bell, M. P., Leopold, J., Berry, D., & Hall, A. V. (2018). Diversity, discrimination, and persistent inequality: Hope for the future through the solidarity economy movement. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 224–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D. (2013). Effects of cooperative membership and participation in decision making on job satisfaction of home health aides. In Kruse, D. (Ed.), Sharing ownership, profits, and decision-making in the 21st century (pp. 3–25), Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D., & Bell, M. P. (2018). Worker cooperatives: Alternative governance for caring and precarious work. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 37(4), 376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D. P., & Schneider, S. (2011). Improving the quality of home health aide jobs: A collaboration between organized labor and a worker cooperative. In Carberry, E. J. (Ed.), Employee ownership and shared capitalism: New directions in research (pp. 59–89). Labor and Employment Relations Association.Google Scholar
Boris, E., & Klein, J. (2012). Caring for America: Home health workers in the shadow of the welfare state. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowiak, C., & Ji, M. (2019). Taxi co-ops versus Uber: Struggles for workplace democracy in the sharing economy. Journal of Labor and Society, 21(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Bransburg, V. (2011, April 19). The Center for Family Life: Tackling poverty and social isolation in Brooklyn with worker cooperatives. Grassroots Economic Organizing (GEO) Newsletter. https://geo.coop/articles/center-family-life-tackling-poverty-and-social-isolation-brooklyn-worker-cooperativesGoogle Scholar
Bretos, I., & Errasti, A. (2018). The challenges of managing across borders in worker cooperatives: Insights from the Mondragon Cooperative Group. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 6(1), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, J., Lamare, R., & Timming, A. (2018). Learning about democracy at work: Cross-sectional evidence on individual employee voice influencing political participation in civil society. ILR Review, 71(4), 956–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdín, G. (2014). Are worker-managed firms more likely to fail than conventional enterprises? Evidence from Uruguay. ILR Review, 67(1), 202–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington-Ward, Y. (2021). Bodily burdens: Physical abuse, workplace injury, and understanding intersectionality through the experiences of African immigrant direct care health workers. Transforming Anthropology, 29(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, B., & Pencavel, J. (1992). The behavior of worker cooperatives: The plywood companies of the Pacific Northwest. The American Economic Review, 82(5), 1083–1105.Google Scholar
Davis, J. C. (2017). From head shops to whole foods: The rise and fall of activist entrepreneurs. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Democracy at Work Institute, & US Federation of Worker Cooperatives. (2022). 2021 State of the sector: Worker cooperatives in the U.S. Democracy at Work Institute. https://institute.coop/resources/2021-worker-cooperative-state-sector-reportGoogle Scholar
Dickstein, C. (1991). The promise and problem of worker cooperatives. Journal of Planning Literature, 6(1), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1907). Economic co-operation among Negro Americans. Atlanta University Press.Google Scholar
Dube, A., & Freeman, R. B. (2010). Complementarity of shared compensation and decision-making systems: Evidence from the American labor market. In Kruse, D. L., Freeman, R. B., & Blasi, J. R. (Eds.), Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options (pp. 167–199). University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerman, D. P. (1988). The legitimate opposition at work: The union’s role in large democratic firms. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 9(4), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esim, S., & Katajamaki, W. (2017). Rediscovering worker cooperatives in a changing world. IUSLabor, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
Eum, H. (2017, January 26). Cooperatives and employment: Second global report 2017. CICOPA. www.cicopa.coop/publications/second-global-report-on-cooperatives-and-employment/Google Scholar
Figueroa, M., & Alkon, A. H. (2017). Cooperative social practices, self-determination, and the struggle for food justice in Oakland and Chicago. In Alkon, A. H. & Guthman, J. (Eds.), The new food activism (1st ed., pp. 206–231). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Flecha, R., & Ngai, P. (2014). The challenge for Mondragon: Searching for the cooperative values in times of internationalization. Organization, 21(5), 666–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funicello, T. (1993). Tyranny of kindness: Dismantling the welfare system to end poverty in America. Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Gerteis, J. (2002). The possession of civic virtue: Movement narratives of race and class in the Knights of Labor. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 580–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J., Cameron, J., Dombroski, K., Healy, S., & Miller, E. (2017). Cultivating community economies: Tools for building a liveable world. The Next System Project. https://thenextsystem.org/cultivating-community-economiesGoogle Scholar
Gordon Nembhard, J. (2014). Collective courage: A history of African American cooperative economic thought and practice. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, A. (2013). Labor republicanism and the transformation of work. Political Theory, 41(4), 591–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, E. S. (1986). Workplace democracy: The political effects of participation. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, E. S. (2008). Spillovers from cooperative and democratic workplaces: Have the benefits been oversold? In Sullivan, B., Snyder, M., & Sullivan, J. (Eds.), Cooperation: The political psychology of effective human interaction (pp. 219–239). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, E. A. (2012). Co-operative workplace dispute resolution: Organizational structure, ownership, and ideology. Gower.Google Scholar
Hoover, M. (2018). Converting employees to owners: Deeper investment for deeper impact. In Horn, C. E. V. (Ed.), Investing in work (pp. 115–128). W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Hudson, L. (2021). New York City: Struggles over the narrative of the solidarity economy. Geoforum, 127, 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannello, K. P. (1992). Decisions without hierarchy: Feminist interventions in organization theory and practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
ICA Group. (2021). 2020 homecare cooperative benchmarking report: By the numbers: Successes and continuing challenges. ICA Group. https://icagroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/5465_HC_2020-BenchmarkingReport_9.20.21.pdfGoogle Scholar
International Cooperative Alliance. (2017, January 3). Guidance notes to the co-operative principles. International Cooperative Alliance. www.ica.coop/en/media/library/research-and-reviews/guidance-notes-cooperative-principlesGoogle Scholar
Jackall, R., & Crain, J. (1984). The shape of the small worker cooperative movement. In Jackall, R. (Ed.), Worker cooperatives in America (pp. 88–104). University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, M. (2016). Revolution or reform? Union–worker cooperative relations in the United States and Korea. Labor Studies Journal, 41(4), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasmir, S. (1996). The myth of Mondragón: Cooperatives, politics, and working-class life in a Basque town. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, C. (1939). Productive enterprises of the unemployed: 1931–1938. University of California.Google Scholar
Kerr, C., & Taylor, P. S. (1935). The self-help cooperatives in California. Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
Knapp, J. G. (1968). The rise of American cooperative enterprise: 1620–1920. Interstate Printers and Publishers.Google Scholar
Kumar, V. S., & Mukherjee, S. (2018). Holacracy – The future of organizing? The case of Zappos. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(7), 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laville, J.-L. (2015). Social and solidarity economy in historical perspective. In Utting, P. (Ed.), Social and solidarity economy: Beyond the fringe (pp. 41–56). Zed Books.Google Scholar
Leikin, S. B. (2004). The practical utopians: American workers and the cooperative movement in the Gilded Age. Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, N. (2012). State of the Union: A century of American labor. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, R. (2006). Reform or revolution and other writings. Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Malleson, T. (2014). After Occupy: Economic democracy for the 21st century. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandiberg, J. M., & Kim, S. M. (2021). A matrix form of multi-organizational hybridity in a cooperative–union venture. In Chen, K. K. & Chen, V. T. (Eds.), Organizational imaginaries: Tempering capitalism and tending to communities through cooperatives and collectivist democracy (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 72, pp. 141–162). Emerald Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Marti, D. B. (1984). Sisters of the Grange: Rural feminism in the late nineteenth century. Agricultural History, 58(3), 247–261.Google Scholar
Martins Rodrigues, J., & Schneider, N. (2021). Scaling co-operatives through a multi-stakeholder network: A case study in the Colorado solar energy industry. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 10(2), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, J. S. M. (2022). Working democracies: Managing inequality in worker cooperatives. ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, J. S. M., & Vallas, S. P. (2016). Diversity regimes in worker cooperatives: Workplace inequality under conditions of worker control. The Sociological Quarterly, 57(1), 98–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, R. (2006). LA story: Immigrant workers and the future of the US labor movement. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. L. (1973). The founding and early history of the Southern Tenant Farmers Union. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, 32(4), 342–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, C. P. (2015). Transcending capitalism through cooperative practices. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Office of Advocacy. (2021). 2021 Small business profile. US Small Business Administration.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. C. (2014). Democratic workplace ownership after the Great Recession: An economic overview of U.S. worker cooperatives in 2013. Democracy at Work Institute.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. C. (2020). 2019 Worker cooperative state of the sector report. Democracy at Work Institute. https://institute.coop/resources/2019-worker-cooperative-state-sector-reportGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. (2018). Shut down the business school: What’s wrong with management education. Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pencavel, J. (2001). Worker participation: Lessons from the worker co-ops of the Pacific Northwest. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
PHI. (2020, September 8). Direct care workers in the United States: Key facts. PHI. www.phinational.org/resource/direct-care-workers-in-the-united-states-key-facts/Google Scholar
Pinto, S. (2021). Economic democracy, embodied: A union co-op strategy for the long-term care sector. In Chen, K. K. & Chen, V. T. (Eds.), Organizational imaginaries: Tempering capitalism and tending to communities through cooperatives and collectivist democracy (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 72, pp. 163–184). Emerald Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Pinto, S. (2023). Cooperative home care associates. In Scharf, A. (Ed.), Just health: Case studies of worker cooperatives in health and care sectors (pp. 40–47). Institute for the Study of Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing, Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations.Google Scholar
Pinto, S., Kerr, C., & Criscietello, R. (2021, December). Shifting power, meeting the moment: Worker ownership as a strategic tool for the labor movement. Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations. https://cleo.rutgers.edu/articles/shifting-power-meeting-the-moment-worker-ownership-as-a-strategy-tool-for-the-labor-movementGoogle Scholar
Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prushinskaya, O., Pockrandt, J., McKinley, J., & Hoover, M. (2021). When workers matter most: A study of worker cooperatives and the prioritization of workers through COVID-19. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 4(2), 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reibstein, S., & Schlachter, L. H. (2022). Gender- and race-based inequalities in democratic worker-owned firms: Evidence from the first national survey of the sector. Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations. https://cleo.rutgers.edu/articles/gender-and-race-based-inequalities-in-democratic-worker-owned-firms-evidence-from-the-first-national-survey-of-the-sector/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. E. (1990). Discrimination against women in New Deal work programs. Affilia, 5(2), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, S. (2016). Professionalisation and precariousness: Perspectives on the sustainability of activism in everyday life. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements, 8(2), 29–58.Google Scholar
Safri, M. (2020). Worker cooperatives. In Gibson-Graham, J. K. & Dombroski, K. (Eds.), Handbook of diverse economies (pp. 40–47). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Schlachter, L. H. (2017). Stronger together? The USW–Mondragon union co-op model. Labor Studies Journal, 42(2), 124–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlachter, L. H. (2021). Diversity, equity, and inclusion trends in the cooperative community. National Cooperative Business Association CLUSA International. https://ncbaclusa.coop/diversity-equity-inclusion-trends-in-the-cooperative-community/Google Scholar
Schlachter, L. H., & Már, K. (2022). Spillover or enrichment? Workplace and civic participation in democratic firms. SocArXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/684tf/Google Scholar
Schlachter, L. H., & Prushinskaya, O. (2021). How economic democracy impacts workers, firms, and communities: The census of individual workers in worker cooperatives. Democracy at Work Institute. https://institute.coop/resources/how-economic-democracy-impacts-workers-firms-and-communitiesGoogle Scholar
Schneiberg, M. (2021). Organizational infrastructures for economic resilience: Alternatives to shareholder value-oriented corporations and unemployment trajectories in the US during the Great Recession. In Chen, K. K. & Chen, V. T. (Eds.), Organizational imaginaries: Tempering capitalism and tending to communities through cooperatives and collectivist democracy (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 72, pp. 187–228). Emerald Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Spicer, J., & Kay, T. (2022). Another organization is possible: New directions in research on alternative enterprise. Sociology Compass, 16(3), e12963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, C. L. (2011). The caring self: The work experiences of home care aides. ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Avent-Holt, D. (2019). Relational inequalities: An organizational approach. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Household data averages: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htmGoogle Scholar
Valocchi, S. (1994). The racial basis of capitalism and the state, and the impact of the New Deal on African Americans. Social Problems, 41(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Webb, B. P. (1897). Industrial democracy. Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Webb, B. P. (1920). A constitution of the socialist commonwealth of Great Britain. Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
White, M. M. (2018). Freedom farmers: Agricultural resistance and the Black freedom movement. University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. Alfred A. Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherell, R. (2013). An emerging solidarity: Worker cooperatives, unions, and the new union cooperative model in the United States. International Journal of Labour Research, 5(2), 251–268.Google Scholar
Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. Verso.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×