Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:26:11.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Gowanus Canal and Public Policy

Community Well-Being at a Superfund Site

from Part III - Community Psychology in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2021

By
Beth Bingham  and
Susan Opotow
Edited by
Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Affiliation:
Long Island University, New York
Get access

Summary

Using historical, ethnographic, and archival research, this chapter examines the intersection of environmental policies and community well-being through the lens of community psychology, particularly its attention to the entwinement of socioeconomic and environmental conditions. Focusing on the Gowanus community in Brooklyn, New York, which is midway through a federally mandated environmental cleanup as a Superfund site, we describe how advancing the collective well-being at the scale of the neighborhood can also entail challenging entrenched power structures that have supported systemic inequalities and working within a diverse group. The collective efforts of the Gowanus Canal Community Advisory Group illustrate how chronic toxic environmental degradation can be addressed within an extended collaborative process. We conclude that while endeavoring to improve the surrounding physical environment, the Group’s efforts have also strengthened collaborative engagement across groups to foster community well-being and social justice.

Keywords

Environmental justicepublic policycommunity well-beingcommunity participationSuperfundsacrifice zonemoral exclusionmoral inclusionland usezoning
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Community Psychology
Interdisciplinary and Contextual Perspectives
 , pp. 331 - 343
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiou, J. (2015). Gowanus: Brooklyn’s curious canal. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Angotti, T., & Hanhardt, E. (2001). Problems and prospects for healthy mixed-use communities in New York City. Planning Practice & Research, 16(2), 145–154. doi.org/10.1080/02697450120077352Google Scholar
Angotti, T., & Morse, S. (2016). Zoned out! Race, displacement, and city planning in New York City. New York: Terreform, Inc.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. C., Anderson, L. S., Cooper, S., et al. (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston Conference on the Education of Psychologists for Community Mental Health. Boston: Boston University.Google Scholar
Bingham, B., & Shapiro, J. (2020). Land use regulation for manufacturing. In Rappaport, N. (Ed.), Designing for urban manufacturing (pp. 203–211). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bond, M. (2016). Leading the way on diversity: Community psychology’s evolution from invisible to individual to contextual. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(3–4), 259–268. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12083Google Scholar
Brash, J. (2010). Bloomberg’s New York: Class and governance in the luxury city. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Bullard, R. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. (2016). “It’s the way that you do it”: Developing an ethical framework for community psychology research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(3–4), 294–302. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, A., Todd, D., & Kral, N. (2014). Ethnography in community psychology: Promises and tensions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1), 60–71. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9648-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, V., & Opotow, S. (2009). Conservation values, environmental identity, and moral inclusion in the Kunene Region, Namibia: A comparative study. Beliefs and Values, 1(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
Chavis, B. F. Jr., & Lee, C. (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States. New York: United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice.Google Scholar
Checker, M. (2005). Polluted promises: Environmental racism and the search for justice in a southern town. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Checker, M. (2019). Environmental gentrification: Sustainability and the just city. In Low, S. (Ed.). The handbook of anthropology and the city (pp. 199–213). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coburn, D. (2004). Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: Class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 58(1), 41–56. doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00159-xGoogle Scholar
Crane, M., Flynn, K., Lucchini, R., et al. (2018). Health impacts of 9/11. In Opotow, S. & Shemtob, Z. B. (Eds.), New York after 9/11 (pp. 145–179). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137–149. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.xGoogle Scholar
Gould, K., & Lewis, T. L. (2017). Green gentrification: Urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gowanus Canal Community Advisory Group. (2019). Home page. https://gowanuscag.orgGoogle Scholar
Gowanus Canal Conservancy. (2019). History. https://gowanuscanalconservancy.org/history/Google Scholar
Gowanus Dredgers Canoe Club. (2019). History. https://gowanuscanal.org/gowanus-canal-historyGoogle Scholar
Kloos, B., & Duffy, K. (2012). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Lerner, S. (2010). Sacrifice zones: The front lines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moos, R. (2003). Social contexts: Transcending their power and their fragility. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1–2), 1–13. doi.org/10.1023/A:1023041101850Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An overview. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.xGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. (2012). Environmental injustice, collaborative action, and the inclusionary shift. In Clayton, S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 414–427). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (2018). Social justice theory and practice: Fostering inclusion in exclusionary contexts. In Hammack, P. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice (pp. 41–56). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Opotow, S., & Weiss, L. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Denial and the process of moral exclusion in environmental conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 475–490. doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00179Google Scholar
Piketty, T., & Goldhammer, A. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porta, M., & Last, J. M. (2018). Public policy. In Porta, M. & Last, J. M. (Eds.), A dictionary of public health (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 33–40.Google Scholar
Prilleltensky, I. (2012). Wellness as fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1–2), 1–21. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9448-8Google Scholar
Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 12–40. doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00182Google Scholar
Rappaport, J. (2011). Searching for OZ: Empowerment, crossing boundaries, and telling our story. In Aber, M. S., Maton, K. I., & Seidman, E. (Eds.), Empowering settings and voices for social change (pp. 232–237). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, A. (2009, October 21). On the waterfront. The New York Times Magazine. www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/magazine/25Key-Gowanus-t.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ruel, E., & Robert, S. A. (2009). A model of racial residential history and its association with self-rated health and mortality among black and white adults in the United States. Sociological Spectrum, 29(4), 443–466. doi.org/10.1080/02732170902904616Google Scholar
Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schueller, S. (2009). Promoting wellness: Integrating community and positive psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(7), 922–937. doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20334Google Scholar
Sonn, C. C., & Fisher, A. T. (1996). Psychological sense of community in a politically constructed group. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 417–430. doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199610)24:4<417::AID-JCOP9>3.0.CO;2-QGoogle Scholar
Stein, S. (2019). Capital city: Gentrification and the real estate state. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Syme, G. J., Kals, E., Nancarrow, B. E., & Montada, L. (2000). Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: A cross‐cultural model. Risk Analysis, 20(6), 905–916. doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.206083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornblom, K., & Vermunt, R. (Eds.). (2007) Distributive and procedural justice: Research and social applications. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Torre, M. E. & Fine, M. with Alexander, N., Billups, A., Blanding, Y., et al. (2008). Participatory action research in the contact zone. In Cammarota, J. & Fine, M. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 23–43). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2019). QuickFacts for Kings County (Brooklyn Borough), New York, 2018. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/kingscountybrooklynboroughnewyork,US/PST045218Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2018, November 30). What is a Superfund? www.epa.gov/superfund/what-superfundGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670–690. doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005004Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×