Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:57:06.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Sustainability Cultures: Exploring the Relationships Between Cultural Attributes and Sustainability Outcomes

from Part IV - Sustainability and Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

By
Janet Stephenson
Edited by
Katharine Legun ,
Julie C. Keller ,
Michael Carolan  and
Michael M. Bell
Katharine Legun
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands
Julie C. Keller
Affiliation:
University of Rhode Island
Michael Carolan
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Michael M. Bell
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Unsustainable behaviour is often blamed on the ‘culture’ of organisations, businesses or households. In this chapter I unpick what culture means in the context of sustainability, and in particular how it can underpin resistance to change or alternatively can be a dynamic and creative force for more sustainable outcomes. The concept of ‘sustainability cultures’ outlined in this chapter offers a structured way of thinking about and investigating culture. It has been applied in a wide variety of situations to help explore cultural attributes that shape outcomes such as energy use and mobility choices by households, businesses and organisations. The chapter also discusses and exemplifies how cultures are both shaped and constrained by exogenous factors which may constrain or facilitate cultural change. This kind of analysis can assist in identifying policy interventions which can remove barriers or support latent potential for cultural change. Seen in sustainability terms, culture is not a bystander, but a core driver of outcomes that are critical to long-term human survival.

Keywords

Culturesustainabilityframeworkactorssocial change
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology , pp. 236 - 248
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, M. S. (1996). Culture and Agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardazzi, R., & Pazienza, M. G. (2017). Switch off the light, please! Energy use, aging population and consumption habits. Energy Economics, 65, 161–71.Google Scholar
Barton, B., Blackwell, S., Carrington, G. et al. (2013). Energy cultures: Implications for policymakers. Centre for Sustainability. Retrieved from https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/3747Google Scholar
Bell, M., Carrington, G, Lawson, R, Stephenson, J (2014). Socio-technical barriers to the use of low-emission timber drying technology in New Zealand. Energy Policy, 67, 747–55.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Dew, N., Aten, K., & Ferrer, G. (2017). How many admirals does it take to change a light bulb? Organizational innovation, energy efficiency, and the United States Navy’s battle over LED lighting. Energy Research & Social Science, 27, 57–67.Google Scholar
Ford, R., Karlin, B., Frantz, C. (2016). Evaluating Energy Cultures: Identifying and validating measures for behaviour-based energy interventions. International Energy Policies and Programmes Evaluation Conference, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ford, R., Walton, S., Stephenson, J. et al. (2017). Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 138–50.Google Scholar
Geels, F.W. (2002). Technical transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31, 1257–74.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gnoth., D. (2016). Residential mobility and changing energy related behaviour (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago.Google Scholar
Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12 (1), 57–72.Google Scholar
Hoicka, C. (2012). Understanding Pro-Environmental Behaviour as Process: Assessing the Importance of Program Structure and (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo).Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. (2017). Destabilising automobility? The emergent mobilities of generation Y. Ambio, 46(3), 371–83.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D., & McCarthy, A. (2016). Change trends in urban freight delivery: A qualitative inquiry. Geoforum, 74, 158–70.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D., & Stephenson, J. (2014). Generation Y mobilities through the lens of energy cultures: a preliminary exploration of mobility cultures. Journal of Transport Geography, 38, 88–91.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D., & Stephenson, J. (2016). The replication and reduction of automobility: Findings from Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 56, 92–101.Google Scholar
King, G., Stephenson, J., & Ford, R. (2014) PV in Blueskin: Drivers, barriers and enablers of uptake of household photovoltaic systems in the Blueskin communities. Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Kurz, T., Gardner, B., Verplankem, B., Abraham, C (2015). Habitual behaviour or patterns of practice? Explaining and changing repetitive climate-relevant actions. WIREs Climate Change, 6,113–28.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor–Network Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lawson, R., Williams, J. (2012). Understanding energy cultures. Annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Academy of Marketing (ANZMAC), December 2012, University of New South Wales, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
Manouseli, D., Anderson, B., & Nagarajan, M. (2018). Domestic water demand during droughts in temperate climates: Synthesising evidence for an integrated framework. Water Resources Management, 32 (2), 433–47.Google Scholar
McKague, F., Lawson, R., Scott, M. and Wooliscroft, B. (2016). Understanding the energy consumption choices and coping mechanisms of fuel poor households in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 31(1), 106–26.Google Scholar
Midgely, G., (2003). Systems Thinking. Sage publications, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moezzi, M., Janda, K. B., & Rotmann, S. (2017). Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–63.Google Scholar
Røpke, I. (2009). Theories of practice—new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68 (10), 2490–2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. (2002). The Site of the Social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Scott, M. G., McCarthy, A., Ford, R., Stephenson, J., & Gorrie, S. (2016). Evaluating the impact of energy interventions: home audits vs. community events. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1221–40.Google Scholar
Scott, M.G. and Lawson, R. (2017). The road code: Encouraging more efficient driving practices in New Zealand, Journal of Energy Efficiency, 1–10Google Scholar
Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The social organisation of normality. Berg: Oxford.Google Scholar
Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2007). Recruitment and reproduction: the careers and carriers of digital photography and floorball. Human Affairs, 17 (2), 154–167.Google Scholar
Shove, E. & Spurling, N. (2013). Sustainable Practices: Social theory and climate change. Routledge, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J. (2018). Sustainability cultures: An actor-centred interpretation of cultural theory. Energy Research and Social Science, 44, 242–249.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G. et al. (2010). Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38: 6120–9.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G. et al. (2015a). The energy cultures framework: Exploring the role of norms, practices and material culture in shaping energy behaviour in New Zealand. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, J., Hopkins, D., Doering, A. (2015b). Conceptualizing transport transitions: Energy Cultures as an organizing framework. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy & Environment, 4, 354–64.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G. et al. (2016). Energy Cultures Policy Briefs. Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago. Retrieved from https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/7104Google Scholar
Sweeney, J. C., Kresling, J., Webb, D., Soutar, G. N., Mazzarol, T. (2013). Energy saving behaviours: Development of a practice-based model. Energy Policy, 61, 371–381.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Walton, S., Doering, A., Gabriel, C., Ford, R. (2014). Energy Transitions: Lighting in Vanuatu. Report prepared for The Australian Aid – Governance for Growth Programme. Retrieved from https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/4859Google Scholar
Walton, S., Zhang, A., & O’Kane, C. (2019). Energy eco‐innovations for sustainable development: Exploring organizational strategic capabilities through an energy cultures framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 812–826.Google Scholar
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–53.Google Scholar
Young, W., & Middlemiss, L. (2012). A rethink of how policy and social science approach changing individuals’ actions on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 41, 742–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×