Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T02:41:14.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages

from Part III - Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

By
Charles B. Chang
Edited by
Silvina Montrul  and
Maria Polinsky
Silvina Montrul
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides an overview of research on heritage language (HL) sound systems, with a focus on areas of convergence and divergence among heritage speakers (HSs), native speakers (NSs) who continue to be dominant in the language, and second language learners (L2ers) who acquired the language later in life. Drawing on data from a wide range of HLs, the chapter addresses both phonetic (articulatory, acoustic, perceptual) and phonological (phonemic, distributional, phonotactic) aspects of the HL sound system, as well as that of the majority language, in light of theories of bilingual speech and variables previously studied as predictors of HSs’ linguistic behavior. Despite the diversity of results reviewed, several recurring themes emerge, including intermediate patterning between NSs and L2ers, a higher level of performance in perception than production, and individual variability. In particular, the depth and the accessibility of HSs’ knowledge of the HL sound system show considerable variation related to structural linguistic factors, demographic and sociolinguistic factors, input and usage-based factors, and methodological factors. In addition to summarizing the areas in which there is an emerging consensus, the chapter points out a number of remaining questions that pave the way for future research on HL sound systems.

Keywords

voice onset timevowel formantsfundamental frequencystresstoneintonationintelligibilityaccentspeech perceptionindividual differences
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics , pp. 581 - 612
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, S., Chang, C. B., DeKeyser, R., and Lee-Ellis, S.. 2017. Age Effects in First Language Attrition: Speech Perception by Korean-English Bilinguals. Language Learning 67(3), 694–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, F. and Stuart-Smith, J.. 2011. Identity and Ethnicity in /t/ in Glasgow-Pakistani High-School Girls. In Lee, W.-S. and Zee, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, 216–219.Google Scholar
Amengual, M. 2016. Acoustic Correlates of the Spanish Tap–Trill Contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 88–112.Google Scholar
Amengual, M. 2018. Asymmetrical Interlingual Influence in the Production of Spanish and English Laterals as a Result of Competing Activation in Bilingual Language Processing. Journal of Phonetics 69, 12–28.Google Scholar
Amengual, M. 2019. Type of Early Bilingualism and Its Effect on the Acoustic Realization of Allophonic Variants: Early Sequential and Simultaneous Bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 23(5), 954–970.Google Scholar
Amengual, M. and Simonet, M.. 2020. Language Dominance Does Not Always Predict Cross-linguistic Interactions in Bilingual Speech Production. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10(6), 847–872.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. R. 1993. American Intonational Interference in Emigré Russian: A Comparative Analysis of Elicited Speech Samples. Slavic and East European Journal 37(2), 162–177.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. R. 2001. Teaching the Russian Heritage Learner: Socio- and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Slavic and East European Journal 45(3), 519–530.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Tyler, M. D., and Best, C. T.. 2012. Two Ways to Listen: Do L2-dominant Bilinguals Perceive Stop Voicing According to Language Mode? Journal of Phonetics 40(4), 582–594.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., and Wong, P. C. M.. 2015. The Bilingual Advantage in Phonetic Learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4), 683–695.Google Scholar
Asherov, D., Fishman, A., and Cohen, E.-G.. 2016. Vowel Reduction in Israeli Heritage Russian. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 113–133.Google Scholar
Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., and Oh, J. S.. 2002. Overhearing a Language during Childhood. Psychological Science 13(3), 238–243.Google Scholar
Au, T. K., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., and Romo, L. F.. 2008. Salvaging a Childhood Language. Journal of Memory and Language 58(4), 998–1011.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. 1994. The Emergence of Native-Language Phonological Influences in Infants: A Perceptual Assimilation Model. In Goodman, J. C. and Nusbaum, H. C. (eds.), The Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Speech Sounds to Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 167–224.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. 1995. A Direct Realist View of Cross-language Speech Perception. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, 171–204.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. and Tyler, M. D.. 2007. Nonnative and Second-Language Speech Perception: Commonalities and Complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. and Munro, M. J. (eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 13–34.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., and Viswanathan, M.. 2004. Bilingualism, Aging, and Cognitive Control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging 19(2), 290–303.Google Scholar
Blasingame, M. 2018. Early versus Extended Exposure in Speech and Vocabulary Learning: Evidence from Switched-Dominance Bilinguals. PhD thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Bullock, B. E. 2009. Prosody in Contact in French: A Case Study from a Heritage Variety in the USA. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 165–194.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2012. Rapid and Multifaceted Effects of Second-Language Learning on First-Language Speech Production. Journal of Phonetics 40(2), 249–268.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2013. A Novelty Effect in Phonetic Drift of the Native Language. Journal of Phonetics 41(6), 491–504.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2016. Bilingual Perceptual Benefits of Experience with a Heritage Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(4), 791–809.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2019a. Language Change and Linguistic Inquiry in a World of Multicompetence: Sustained Phonetic Drift And Its Implications for Behavioral Linguistic Research. Journal of Phonetics 74, 96–113.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2019b. The Phonetics of Second Language Learning and Bilingualism. In Katz, W. F. and Assmann, P. F. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics. Abingdon: Routledge, 427–447.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. and Yao, Y.. 2016. Toward an Understanding of Heritage Prosody: Acoustic and Perceptual Properties of Tone Produced by Heritage, Native, and Second Language Speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 134–160.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. and Yao, Y.. 2019. Production of Neutral Tone in Mandarin by Heritage, Native, and Second Language Speakers. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., and Warren, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc., 2291–2295.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2009. A Tale of Five Fricatives: Consonantal Contrast in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2010. The Phonetic Space of Phonological Categories in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. In Bane, M., Bueno, J., Grano, T., Grotberg, A., and McNabb, Y. (eds.), Proceedings from the 44th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Main Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 31–45.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Yao, Y., Haynes, E. F., and Rhodes, R.. 2011. Production of Phonetic and Phonological Contrast by Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129(6), 3964–3980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y., Xu, Y., and Guion-Anderson, S.. 2014. Prosodic Realization of Focus in Bilingual Production of Southern Min and Mandarin. Phonetica 71(4), 249–270.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. 2019a. Age of Arrival Does Not Affect Childhood Immigrants’ Acquisition of Ongoing Sound Change: Evidence from Korean Americans. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., and Warren, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc., 2213–2217.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. 2019b. VOT Merger and f0 Contrast in Heritage Korean in California. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 25(1), 69–77.Google Scholar
Cheon, S. Y. and Lee, T.. 2013. The Perception of Korean Stops by Heritage and Non-heritage Learners: Pedagogical Implications for Beginning Learners. The Korean Language in America 18, 23–39.Google Scholar
Cho, M.-H. and Lee, S.. 2016. The Impact of Different L1 and L2 Learning Experience in the Acquisition of L1 Phonological Processes. Language Sciences 56, 30–44.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Cutler, A., and Broersma, M.. 2017. Early Development of Abstract Language Knowledge: Evidence from Perception–Production Transfer of Birth-Language Memory. Royal Society Open Science 4(1), 160660.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., Cuza, A., and Mazzaro, N.. 2016. Task-Related Effects in the Prosody of Spanish Heritage Speakers and Long-Term Immigrants. In Armstrong, M. E., Henriksen, N., and Vanrell, M. M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 1–24.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 1997. The Consequences of Bilingualism for Cognitive Processing. In de Groot, A. M. B. and Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 279–300.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 2003. The Changing L1 in the L2 User’s Mind. In Cook, V. (ed.), Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cornwell, S. and Rafat, Y.. 2017. English Interdental Fricative Production in Dutch Heritage Speakers Living in Canada. Ilha do Desterro 70(3), 95–115.Google Scholar
Cummings Ruiz, L. D. 2019. North Midland /u/-fronting and Its Effects on Heritage Speakers of Spanish. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., and Warren, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc., 1099–1103.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Burchfield, L. A., and Antoniou, M.. 2019. A Criterial Interlocutor Tally for Successful Talker Adaptation? In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., and Warren, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc., 1485–1489.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, E. and Bogulski, C. A.. 2016. Frequent L2 Language Use Enhances Executive Control in Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(5), 907–913.Google Scholar
Dehé, N. 2018. The Intonation of Polar Questions in North American (“Heritage”) Icelandic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30(3), 213–259.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, A. 2018. Personae and Phonetic Detail in Sociolinguistic Signs. Language in Society 47(4), 513–539.Google Scholar
Elias, V., McKinnon, S., and Milla-Muñoz, Á.. 2017. The Effects of Code-Switching and Lexical Stress on Vowel Quality and Duration of Heritage Speakers of Spanish. Languages 2(4), 29.Google Scholar
Escalante, C. 2018. ¡Ya pué[h]! Perception of Coda-/s/ Weakening among L2 and Heritage Speakers in Coastal Ecuador. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 5(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1995. Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings, and Problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore: York Press, 233–272.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1996. English Vowel Productions by Dutch Talkers: More Evidence for the “Similar” vs “New” Distinction. In James, A. and Leather, J. (eds.), Second-Language Speech: Structure and Process. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 11–52.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 2007. Language Contact in Bilingualism: Phonetic System Interactions. In Cole, J. and Hualde, J. I. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 353–382.Google Scholar
Flores, C. and Rato, A.. 2016. Global Accent in the Portuguese Speech of Heritage Returnees. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 161–183.Google Scholar
Flores, C., Rinke, E., and Rato, A.. 2017. Comparing the Outcomes of Early and Late Acquisition of European Portuguese: An Analysis of Morpho-syntactic and Phonetic Performance. Heritage Language Journal 14(2), 124–149.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., Krause, M., and Dittmers, T.. 2018. VOT Production in Multilingual Learners of French As a Foreign Language: Cross-Linguistic Influence from the Heritage Languages Russian and Turkish. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 23(1), 59–72.Google Scholar
Godson, L. 2003. Phonetics of Language Attrition: Vowel Production and Articulatory Setting in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Godson, L. 2004. Vowel Production in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 2(1), 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gor, K. 2014. Raspberry, Not a Car: Context Predictability and a Phonological Advantage in Early and Late Learners’ Processing of Speech in Noise. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1449.Google Scholar
Hrycyna, M., Lapinskaya, N., Kochetov, A., and Nagy, N.. 2011. VOT Drift in 3 Generations of Heritage Language Speakers in Toronto. Canadian Acoustics 39(3), 166–167.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. and Prieto, P.. 2016. Towards an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology 7(1), 5.Google Scholar
Kan, R. T. Y. and Schmid, M. S.. 2019. Development of Tonal Discrimination in Young Heritage Speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics 73, 40–54.Google Scholar
Kang, Y. and Nagy, N.. 2016. VOT Merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28(2), 249–272.Google Scholar
Kang, Y., George, S., and Soo, R.. 2016. Cross-Language Influence in the Stop Voicing Contrast in Heritage Tagalog. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 184–218.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2010. Phonological Effect of Single-Word Insertion by Korean Heritage Speakers: Vowel Epenthesis in Word-Final Position. Korean Journal of Linguistics 35(1), 49–70.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2011. L1–L2 Phonetic Interference in the Production of Spanish Heritage Speakers in the US. The Korean Journal of Hispanic Studies 4, 1–28.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2014. Use of Suprasegmental Information in the Perception of Spanish Lexical Stress by Spanish Heritage Speakers of Different Generations. In Campbell, N., Gibbon, D., and Hirst, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody. Dublin: International Speech Communication Association, 453–456.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2015. Perception and Production of Spanish Lexical Stress by Spanish Heritage Speakers and English L2 Learners of Spanish. In Willis, E. W., Martín Butragueño, P., and Herrera Zendejas, E. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 106–128.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2017. Voice Quality Transfer in the Production of Spanish Heritage Speakers and English L2 Learners of Spanish. In Perpiñán, S., Heap, D., Moreno-Villamar, I., and Soto-Corominas, A. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 191–207.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2019. Heritage Speakers’ Use of Prosodic Strategies in Focus Marking in Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 23(5), 986–1004.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2020. Discrepancy between Heritage Speakers’ Use of Suprasegmental Cues in the Perception and Production of Spanish Lexical Stress. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(2), 233–250.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. and Repiso Puigdelliura, G.. 2020. Deconstructing Heritage Language Dominance: Effects of Proficiency, Use, and Input on Heritage Speakers’ Production of the Spanish Alveolar Tap. Phonetica 77(1), 55–80.Google Scholar
Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Oh, J. S., and Au, T. K.. 2003. Production Benefits of Childhood Overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114(1), 465–474.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. 2000. A New View of Language Acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(22), 11850–11857.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., Klaschik, E., Stangen, I., Lein, T., and van de Weijer, J.. 2014. Foreign Accent in Adult Simultaneous Bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal 11(2), 123–150.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. and Polinsky, M.. 2017. Silence Is Difficult: On Missing Elements in Bilingual Grammars. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 36(1), 135–163.Google Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S. 2012. Looking into Bilingualism through the Heritage Speaker’s Mind. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Lein, T., Kupisch, T., and van de Weijer, J.. 2016. Voice Onset Time and Global Foreign Accent in German–French Simultaneous Bilinguals during Adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism 20(6), 732–749.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, A., Einfeldt, M., and Kupisch, T.. 2020. Italian-German Bilinguals: The Effects of Heritage Language Use on Accent in Early-Acquired Languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(2), 289–304.Google Scholar
Lukyanchenko, A. and Gor, K.. 2011. Perceptual Correlates of Phonological Representations in Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners. In Danis, N., Mesh, K., and Sung, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 414–426.Google Scholar
Lüpke, F. and Storch, A.. 2013. Repertoires and Choices in African Languages. Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Łyskawa, P., Maddeaux, R., Melara, E., and Nagy, N.. 2016. Heritage Speakers Follow All the Rules: Language Contact and Convergence in Polish Devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 219–244.Google Scholar
Mayr, R. and Siddika, A.. 2018. Inter-generational Transmission in a Minority Language Setting: Stop Consonant Production by Bangladeshi Heritage Children and Adults. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(3), 255–284.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., López-Bueno, L., Vázquez Fernández, M., and Tomé Lourido, G.. 2019. The Role of Early Experience and Continued Language Use in Bilingual Speech Production: A Study of Galician and Spanish Mid Vowels by Galician-Spanish Bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 72, 1–16.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K., Evans, B. G., and Mahon, M.. 2011. Detailing the Phonetic Environment: A Sociophonetic Study of the London Bengali Community. In Lee, W.-S. and Zee, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong, 1354–1357.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K., Evans, B. G., and Mahon, M.. 2013. Acquiring a Second Language in an Immigrant Community: The Production of Sylheti and English Stops and Vowels by London-Bengali Speakers. Journal of Phonetics 41(5), 344–358.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. M., Mahon, M., Rosen, S., and Evans, B. G.. 2014. Speech Perception and Production by Sequential Bilingual Children: A Longitudinal Study of Voice Onset Time Acquisition. Child Development 85(5), 1965–1980.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2015. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2015. A Sociolinguistic View of Null Subjects and VOT in Toronto Heritage Languages. Lingua 164(B), 309–327.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2016. Heritage Languages as New Dialects. In Côté, M.-H., Knooihuizen, R., and Nerbonne, J. (eds.), The Future of Dialects. Berlin: Language Science Press, 15–35.Google Scholar
Natvig, D. 2016. Heritage Norwegian Vowel Phonology and English Dialect Formation. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 245–274.Google Scholar
Newlin-Łukowicz, L. 2014. From Interference to Transfer in Language Contact: Variation in Voice Onset Time. Language Variation and Change 26(3), 359–385.Google Scholar
Nodari, R., Celata, C., and Nagy, N.. 2019. Socio-indexical Phonetic Features in the Heritage Language Context: Voiceless Stop Aspiration in the Calabrian Community in Toronto. Journal of Phonetics 73, 91–112.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S. and Au, T. K.. 2005. Learning Spanish as a Heritage Language: The Role of Sociocultural Background Variables. Language, Culture and Curriculum 18(3), 229–241.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S., Au, T. K., and Jun, S. A.. 2010. Early Childhood Language Memory in the Speech Perception of International Adoptees. Journal of Child Language 37(5), 1123–1132.Google Scholar
Oh, J., Jun, S.-A., Knightly, L., and Au, T.. 2003. Holding on to Childhood Language Memory. Cognition 86(3), B53–B64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., Dupoux, E., and Mehler, J.. 2003. Brain Imaging of Language Plasticity in Adopted Adults: Can a Second Language Replace the First? Cerebral Cortex 13(2), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, R. 2015. Manifestations of /bdg/ in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 12(1), 48–74.Google Scholar
Rao, R. 2016a. Introduction to Special Issue on Heritage Phonetics and Phonology. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), i.Google Scholar
Rao, R. 2016b. On the Nuclear Intonational Phonology of Heritage Speakers of Spanish. In Pascual y Cabo, D. (ed.), Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 51–80.Google Scholar
Rao, R. and Ronquest, R.. 2015. The Heritage Spanish Phonetic/Phonological System: Looking Back and Moving Forward. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 8(2), 403–414.Google Scholar
Ronquest, R. 2016. Stylistic Variation in Heritage Spanish Vowel Production. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 275–297.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. 2013. First Language Attrition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4(2), 117–123.Google Scholar
Shea, C. 2019. Dominance, Proficiency, and Spanish Heritage Speakers’ Production of English and Spanish Vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(1), 123–149.Google Scholar
Shelton, M., Counselman, D., and Gutiérrez Palma, N.. 2017. Metalinguistic Intuitions and Dominant Language Transfer in Heritage Spanish Syllabification. Heritage Language Journal 14(3), 288–306.Google Scholar
Shin, E. 2005. The Perception of Foreign Accents in Spoken Korean by Prosody: Comparison of Heritage and Non-heritage Speakers. The Korean Language in America 10, 103–118.Google Scholar
Singh, L. and Seet, S. K.. 2019. The Impact of Foreign Language Caregiving on Native Language Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 185, 51–70.Google Scholar
Solon, M., Knarvik, N., and DeClerck, J.. 2019. On Comparison Groups in Heritage Phonetics/Phonology Research: The Case of Bilingual Spanish Vowels. Hispanic Studies Review 4(1), 165–192.Google Scholar
Strange, W. 2011. Automatic Selective Perception (ASP) of First and Second Language Speech: A Working Model. Journal of Phonetics 39(4), 456–466.Google Scholar
Tees, R. C. and Werker, J. F.. 1984. Perceptual Flexibility: Maintenance or Recovery of the Ability to Discriminate Non-native Speech Sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology 38(4), 579–590.Google Scholar
Tse, H. 2016a. Contact-Induced Splits in Toronto Heritage Cantonese Mid-vowels. Linguistica Atlantica 35(2), 133–155.Google Scholar
Tse, H. 2016b. Variation and Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese: An Analysis of Two Monophthongs across Two Generations. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 2(2), 124–156.Google Scholar
Tse, H. 2019. Beyond the Monolingual Core and out into the Wild: A Variationist Study of Early Bilingualism and Sound Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. R. 2001. A Global Perspective on Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. In Alatis, J. E. and Tan, A.-H. (eds.), Language in Our Time: Bilingual Education and Official English, Ebonics and Standard English, Immigration and the Unz Initiative. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 332–340.Google Scholar
van de Weijer, J. and Kupisch, T. 2015. Voice Onset Time in Heritage Speakers and Second-Language Speakers of German. In Babatsouli, E. and Ingram, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015. Chania: Institute of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech, 414–420.Google Scholar
van Rijswijk, R., Muntendam, A., and Dijkstra, T.. 2017. Focus Marking in Dutch by Heritage Speakers of Turkish and Dutch L1 Speakers. Journal of Phonetics 61, 48–70.Google Scholar
Ventureyra, V. A. G., Pallier, C., and Yoo, H.-Y.. 2004. The Loss of First Language Phonetic Perception in Adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17(1), 79–91.Google Scholar
Wong, P. and Strange, W.. 2017. Phonetic Complexity Affects Children’s Mandarin Tone Production Accuracy in Disyllabic Words: A Perceptual Study. PLoS ONE 12(8), e0182337.Google Scholar
Yakel, A. N. 2018. Rhythmic Variation in Speakers of Spanish as a Heritage Language. PhD thesis, University of Houston, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Yang, B. 2015. Perception and Production of Mandarin Tones by Native Speakers and L2 Learners. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Yao, Y. and Chang, C. B.. 2016. On the Cognitive Basis of Contact-Induced Sound Change: Vowel Merger Reversal in Shanghainese. Language 92(2), 433–467.Google Scholar
Yao, Y., Chan, A., Fung, R., Wu, W. L., Leung, N., Lee, S., and Luo, J.. 2020. Cantonese Tone Production in Pre-school Urdu-Cantonese Bilingual Minority Children. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(2), 767–782.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E., and Liu, S.. 2000. Pronunciation Proficiency in the First and Second Languages of Korean-English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3(2), 131–149.Google Scholar
Zárate-Sández, G. A. 2015. Perception and Production of Intonation among English-Spanish Bilingual Speakers at Different Proficiency Levels. PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., and Tohkura, Y.. 2005. Effects of Language Experience: Neural Commitment to Language-Specific Auditory Patterns. NeuroImage 26(3), 703–720.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×