Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:36:05.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Consensus and Controversy

from Part II - Description and Measurement: How Personality Is Studied

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Robert R. McCrae
Edited by
Philip J. Corr  and
Gerald Matthews
Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Get access

Summary

There is little doubt that the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality traits (the “Big Five”) is currently the dominant paradigm in personality research and one of the most influential models in all of psychology. Digman’s 1990 review on the topic has become one of the most highly cited articles in the history of the Annual Review of Psychology, with over 8,500 citations. Barrick and Mount’s 1991 meta-analysis of job performance and the FFM – itself cited 11,000 times – brought personality back into the mainstream of Industrial/Organizational Psychology. The FFM has led to novel and compelling reformulations of the personality disorders that have influenced DSM-V (Widiger & Trull, 2007). Cross-cultural collaborations have shown the universality of the FFM and demonstrated pervasive fallacies in national character stereotypes (Terracciano et al., 2005). Social Psychologist Harry Reis (personal communication, April 24, 2006) characterized the FFM as “the most scientifically rigorous taxonomy that behavioral science has,” and for his research on the FFM, Paul Costa was selected by the Division of General Psychology of the American Psychological Association to present the 2004 Arthur W. Staats Lecture for Contributions towards Unifying Psychology.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 129 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five-Factor Model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 319–349). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allik, J., Church, A. T., Ortiz, F. A., Rossier, J., Hřebíčková, M., de Fruyt, F., Realo, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Mean profiles of the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 402–420.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (2000, July). The FFM: A comparison of German speaking countries (Austria, Former East and West Germany, and Switzerland). Paper presented at the XXVIIth International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B., Caspi, A., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (2002). The puzzle of personality types [Special Issue]. European Journal of Personality, 16 (S1).Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty–Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1353.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1952–1962.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blass, L., … De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.Google Scholar
Ball, S. A. (2002). Big Five, Alternative Five, and seven personality dimensions: Validity in substance-dependent patients. In Costa, P. T. Jr. & Widiger, T. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 177–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2013). Scalar equivalence of OPQ32: Big Five profiles of 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.Google Scholar
Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845–876.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar
Cervone, D. (2004). Personality assessment: Tapping the social-cognitive architecture of personality. Behavior Therapy, 35, 113–129.Google Scholar
Cheung, F., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 433–452.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W. Z., Zhang, J. X., & Zhang, J. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, A. T., Alvarez, J.M., Mai, N. T., French, B. F., Katigbak, M. S., & Ortiz, F.A. (2011). Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1068–1089.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Author.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1427–1440.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation–motivation) approach. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2339–2354.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980a). Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980b). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In Baltes, P. B. & Brim, O. G. Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65–102). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Trait psychology comes of age. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and aging (pp. 169–204). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2019). Personality across the life span. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 423–448.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Peabody, D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451–474.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (Eds.) (2002). Big Five assessment. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116–123.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1967.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48, 473–493.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1983, June). The magical number five, plus or minus two: Some considerations on the dimensionality of personality descriptors. Paper presented at a Research Seminar, Gerontology Research Center, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (2002). Implications of personality individual differences science for clinical work on personality disorders. In Costa, P. T. Jr. & Widiger, T. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 391–403). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. B. (2014). Environmental sustainability and national personality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 233–240.Google Scholar
Hřebíčková, M., & Graf, S. (2014). Accuracy of national stereotypes in central Europe: Outgroups are not better than ingroup in considering personality traits of real people. European Journal of Personality, 28, 60–72.Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Ando, J., Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Angleitner, A., … Spinath, F. (2006). Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 261–272.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203.Google Scholar
Juni, S. (1996). Review of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In Conoley, J. C. & Impara, J. C. (Eds.), 12th Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 863–868). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Keiser, H. N., & Ross, S. R. (2011). Carver and White’s BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 39–44.Google Scholar
Kurtz, J. E., & Sherker, J. L. (2003). Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality traits in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 71, 21–48.Google Scholar
Lanning, K. (1994). Dimensionality of observer ratings on the California Adult Q-Set. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 151–160.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.Google Scholar
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293–303.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the Five-Factor Model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI and other instruments. In Buss, D. M. & Cantor, N. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237–245). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1990). Traits and trait names: How well is Openness represented in natural languages? European Journal of Personality, 4, 119–129.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential Openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In McCrae, R. R. & Allik, J. (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 105–126). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2007). Aesthetic chills as a universal marker of Openness to Experience. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 5–11.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2009). Personality profiles of cultures: Patterns of ethos. European Journal of Personality, 23, 205–227.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2017). The Five-Factor Model across cultures. In Church, A. T. (Ed.), Praeger handbook of personality across cultures (Vol. 1, pp. 47–72). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2018). Defining traits. In Ziegler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. (Eds.), Sage handbook of individual differences (pp. 3–22). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Allik, J. (Eds.) (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Chan, W., Jussim, L., De Fruyt, F., Löckenhoff, C. E., De Bolle, M., … Terracciano, A. (2013). The inaccuracy of national character stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 831–842.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1988). Age, personality, and the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S177–S185.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1995). Positive and negative valence within the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 443–460.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008a). Empirical and theoretical status of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 273–294). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008b). The Five-Factor Theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Busch, C. M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q-Set and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430–446.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Herbst, J. H., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2001). Effects of acquiescence on personality factor structures. In Riemann, R., Ostendorf, F. & Spinath, F. (Eds.), Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure (pp. 217–231). Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28–50.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Scally, M., Terracciano, A., Abecasis, G. A., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2010). An alternative to the search for single polymorphisms: Toward molecular personality scales for the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1014–1024.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2008). The Five-Factor Model and its correlates in individuals and cultures. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A. & Poortinga, Y. (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 249–283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., Gelfand, M. J., Costa, P. T. Jr., & 42 Collaborators of the Adolescent Personality Profiles of Cultures project. (2010). The validity and structure of culture-level personality scores: Data from ratings of young adolescents. Journal of Personality, 78, 815–838.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2007). Climatic warmth and national wealth: Some culture-level determinants of national character stereotypes; Response: On the validity of culture-level personality and stereotype scores. European Journal of Personality, 21, 953–976; 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Yamagata, S., Jang, K. L., Riemann, R., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 442–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mõttus, R. (2016). Towards more rigorous trait-outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303.Google Scholar
Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, M., Riemann, R., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490.Google Scholar
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Niszczota, P. (2014). Cross-country differences in personality and the foreign bias in international equity portfolios. The European Journal of Finance, 20, 934–956.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.Google Scholar
Pettersson, E., Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E., & Menatti, A. R. (2012). The general factor of personality and evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 26, 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013.Google Scholar
Pilia, G., Chen, W.-M., Scuteri, A., Orrú, M., Albai, G., Deo, M., et al. (2006). Heritability of cardiovascular and personality traits in 6,148 Sardinians. PLoS Genetics, 2, 1207–1223.Google Scholar
Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality, 65, 449–475.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. E. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of Conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 164–178.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of Conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Personality traits change in adulthood: Reply to Costa and McCrae (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 29–32.Google Scholar
Rossberger, R. J. (2014). National personality profiles and innovation: The role of cultural practices. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 331–348.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.Google Scholar
Singer, J. A. (2005). Personality and psychotherapy: Treating the whole person. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, T., Griffin, S. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2017). Capturing the DSM‐5 Alternative Personality Disorder model traits in the Five‐Factor Model’s nomological net. Journal of Personality, 85, 220–231.Google Scholar
Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalak, A. M., Ádám, N., Adamovová, L., Ahn, C.-k., Ahn, H.-n., et al. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96–100.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61–97, Lackland Airforce Base, TX: US Air Force.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225–251.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. & Pandey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method (pp. 257–300). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A. (Ed.) (2017). The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T. Jr., Gore, W. L., & Crego, C. (2013). Five-Factor Model personality disorder research. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 75–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Gardner, M. H., & Harms, P. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111.Google Scholar
Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K., et al. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 987–998.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×