75 - Medical Decision-Making
from Theme 1: - Health Care Environment and Behaviour
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 339 - 342Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Baron, J. (2004). Normative models of judgment and decision making. In Koehler, D. J. & Harvey, N. (eds), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 19–36). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Berns, G. S., Laibson, D. & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Intertemporal choice: toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(11), 482–488. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.011.Google Scholar
Bhargava, S. & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Choosing a health insurance plan: complexity and consequences. JAMA, 314(23), 2505–2506. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.15176.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. B., Li, M., Vietri, J., et al. (2012). Using game theory to examine incentives in influenza vaccination behavior. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1008–1015. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612437606.Google Scholar
Colby, H., DeWitt, J. & Chapman, G. B. (2015). Grouping promotes equality: the effect of recipient grouping on allocation of limited medical resources. Psychological Science. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615583978.Google Scholar
Dayan, E. & Bar-Hillel, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity II: menu positions influence food orders. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 333–342.Google Scholar
Downs, J. S., Loewenstein, G. & Wisdom, J. (2009). Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. American Economic Review, 99(2), 159–164. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.2.159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.Google Scholar
Galvani, A. P., Reluga, T. C. & Chapman, G. B. (2007). Long-standing influenza vaccination policy is in accord with individual self-interest but not with the utilitarian optimum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(13), 5692–5697. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0606774104.Google Scholar
Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C. & Ubel, P. A. (2002). The role of physicians’ recommendations in medical treatment decisions. Medical Decision Making, 22(3), 262–271. DOI: 10.1177/0272989x0202200314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, E., Shu, S., Dellaert, B., et al. (2012). Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23(2), 487–504. DOI: 10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E., Hassin, R., Baker, T., Bajger, A. & Treuer, G. (2013). Can consumers make affordable care affordable? The value of choice architecture. PLoS One, 8(12), e81521.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–291. DOI: 10.2307/1914185.Google Scholar
Li, M., & DeWitt, J. (2017). Equality by Principle, Efficiency by Practice: How Policy Description Affects Allocation Preference. In Li, M. & Tracer, D. P. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Fairness, Equity, and Justice (pp. 67–91). Cham: Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
Li, M. & Chapman, G. B. (2009). ‘100% of anything looks good’: the appeal of one hundred percent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 156–162. DOI: 10.3758/pbr.16.1.156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, M. & Chapman, G. B. (2013). A big fish or a small pond? Framing effects in percentages. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 190–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.003.Google Scholar
Li, M. & Chapman, G. B. (in press). Medical Decision Making. Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Li, M., Taylor, E. G., Atkins, K. E., Chapman, G. B. & Galvani, A. P. (2016). Stimulating influenza vaccination via prosocial motives. PLoS One, 11(7), e0159780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G. & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37–44. DOI: 10.1177/0272989x0102100105.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. M., Afendulis, C. C., McGuire, T. G. & Landon, B. E. (2011). Complex Medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors – especially those with impaired decision making. Health Affairs. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132.Google Scholar
Milkman, K. L., Minson, J. A. & Volpp, K. G. M. (2014). Holding the hunger games hostage at the gym: an evaluation of temptation bundling. Management Science, 60(2), 283–299. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, V. A. (2012). What we don’t know can hurt our patients: physician innumeracy and overuse of screening tests. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(5), 392–393. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156–5-201203060-00015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Over, D. (2004). Rationality and the normative/descriptive distinction. In Koehler, D. J. & Harvey, N. (eds), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 3–18). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Persad, G., Wertheimer, A. & Emanuel, E. J. (2009). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet, 373(9661), 423–431.Google Scholar
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., et al. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.Google Scholar
Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K. & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973. DOI: 10.1037/a0017327.Google Scholar
Rogers, T., Milkman, K. L. & Volpp, K. G. (2014). Commitment devices: using initiatives to change behavior. JAMA, 311(20), 2065–2066. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3485.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Scott, S., Dingley, M., et al. (2011). Nudge to nobesity I: minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, S. L. & Pignone, M. (2002). Numeracy and the medical student’s ability to interpret data. Effective Clinical Practice, 5(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5), 364–371. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.50.5.364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Response mode, framing, and information-processing effects in risk assessment. In Hogarth, R. (ed.), New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: Question Framing and Response Consistency (pp. 21–36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, A. N., Sonnenberg, L., Riis, J., Barraclough, S. & Levy, D. E. (2012). A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 527–533. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300391.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.Google Scholar
Ubel, P. A., Baron, J. & Asch, D. A. (2001). Preference for equity as a framing effect. Medical Decision Making, 21(3), 180–189. DOI: 10.1177/0272989x0102100303.Google Scholar
Ubel, P. A., Angott, A. M. & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2011). Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(7), 630–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volpp, K. G., John, L. K., Troxel, A. B., et al. (2008). Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA, 300(22), 2631–2637. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.804.Google Scholar
Volpp, K. G., Troxel, A. B., Pauly, M. V., et al. (2009). A randomized, controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(7), 699–709. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0806819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, C., McGraw, A. P. & Van Boven, L. (2011). Values and preferences: defining preference construction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(2), 193–205. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.98.Google ScholarPubMed
Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., Colditz, G. A. & Emmons, K. M. (2007a). Aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12(Pt 3), 383–401. DOI: 10.1348/135910706x115209.Google Scholar
Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., Colditz, G. A. & Emmons, K. M. (2007b). Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(1), 11–21. DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.1.11.Google Scholar
Wegwarth, O. & Gigerenzer, G. (2013). Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: evaluation of what physicians tell their patients about screening harms. JAMA Internal Medicine, 173(22), 2086–2087. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegwarth, O., Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Gaissmaier, W. & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(5), 340–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Sarr, B., Fagerlin, A. & Ubel, P. A. (2006). A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(6), 618–622. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00410.x.Google Scholar