Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:55:54.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Doing It: Participatory Visual Methodologies and Youth Sexuality Research

from Part II - How Do We Study Sexual Development?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

By
Katie MacEntee  and
Sarah Flicker
Edited by
Sharon Lamb  and
Jen Gilbert
Sharon Lamb
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Jen Gilbert
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Participatory visual methodologies (PVMs) disrupt the traditional hierarchy between researcher and participant and open up possibilities for processes and findings that may be overlooked in adult-driven research methodologies. In this chapter, the authors argue that PVMs are especially well-suited to research with young people about sexuality, as young people can use these methods to explore topics about which they may have difficulty speaking or writing. They describe several examples of PVMs in sexuality research with youth, providing a case study for each that highlights how the particularities of each PVM technique shaped the research projects. This chapter provides guidance for researchers choosing among various PVM techniques and navigating the ethical and practical challenges that PVMs pose.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sexual Development
Childhood and Adolescence
 , pp. 352 - 372
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, L. (1991). The Problem of Speaking for Others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32.Google Scholar
Allen, L. & Ingram, T. (2015). “Bieber Fever”: Girls, Desire and the Negotiation of Girlhood Sexualities. In Renold, E., Ringrose, J., & Egan, R. D. (Eds.), Children, Sexuality and Sexualization (141–158). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ball, H. (2008). Quilts. In Knowles, J. G. & Cole, A. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues (363–368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brandt, D. (2008). Touching Minds and Hearts: Community Arts as Collaborative Research. In Knowles, J. G. & Cole, A. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues (351–362). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Buckingham, D. & Sefton-Green, J. (1994). Cultural Studies Goes to School: Reading and Teaching Popular Media. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Burkholder, C. (2016). We Are HK too! Disseminating Cellphilms in a Participatory Archive. In MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (Eds.), What’s a Cellphim?: Integrating Mobile Phone Technology into Participatory Arts-Based Research and Activism. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Burkholder, C. & MacEntee, K. (2016). Exploring the Ethics of a Participant-Produced Cellphilm Archive: The Complexities of Dissemination. In Warr, D., Guillemin, M., Cox, S. M., & Waycott, J. (Eds.), Visual Research Ethics: Learning from Practice. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Catalani, C. & Minkler, M. (2010). Photovoice: A Review of the Literature in Health and Public Health. Health Education & Behavior, 37(3), 424–451.Google Scholar
Chalfen, R. (2011). Differentiating Practices of Participatory Visual Media Production. In Margolis, E. & Pauwels, L. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (186–200). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Dakin, E. K., Parker, S. N., Amell, J. W., & Rogers, B. S. (2015). Seeing with Our Own Eyes: Youth in Mathare, Kenya Use Photovoice to Examine Individual and Community Strengths. Qualitative Social Work, 14(2), 170–192. doi:10.1177/1473325014526085.Google Scholar
Danforth, J. & Flicker, S. (2014). Taking Action!!: Art and Aboriginal Youth Leadership for HIV Prevention. Toronto, ON: Taking Action. www.takingaction4youth.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/1455_TakingAction2_Booklet_LowRes.pdf.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. S. & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sext Education: Pedagogies of Sex, Gender and Shame in the Schoolyards of Tagged and Exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), 8–21. doi:10.1080/14681811.2015.1050486.Google Scholar
Drew, S. E., Duncan, R. E., & Sawyer, S. M. (2010). Visual Storytelling: A Beneficial But Challenging Method for Health Research with Young People. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1677–1688. doi:10.1177/1049732310377455.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (1997). The Promise and Perils of Alternative Forms of Data Representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4–10.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (2003). On the Differences between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative Research. Visual Arts Research, 29(57), 5–11.Google Scholar
Flicker, S. (2008). Who Benefits from Community-Based Participatory Research? A Case Study of the Positive Youth Project. Health Education & Behavior, 35(1), 70–86.Google Scholar
Flicker, S., Danforth, J., Konsmo, E., et al. (2013). “Because We Are Natives and We Stand Strong to Our Pride”: Decolonizing HIV Prevention with Aboriginal Youth in Canada Using the Arts. Canadian Journal of Aboriginal Community-Based HIV/AIDS Research, 5, 4–24.Google Scholar
Flicker, S., Danforth, J. Y., Wilson, C., et al. (2014). “Because We Have Really Unique Art”: Decolonizing Research with Indigenous Youth Using the Arts. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 10(1), 16.Google Scholar
Flicker, S., & Guta, A. (2008). Ethical Approaches to Adolescent Participation in Sexual Health Research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.017.>Google Scholar
Flicker, S., Maley, O., Ridgley, A., et al. (2008). e-PAR: Using Technology and Participatory Action Research to Engage Youth in Health Promotion. Action Research, 6(3), 285–303. doi:10.1177/1476750307083711.Google Scholar
Flicker, S., Native Youth Sexual Health Network, Wilson, C., et al. (2017). “Stay Strong, Stay Sexy, Stay Native”: Storying Indigenous Youth HIV Prevention Activism. Action Research. doi:10.1177/1476750317721302.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1984). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by M. Bergman Ramos. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. P., Minkler, M., Cardenas, Z., Grills, C., & Porter, C. (2013). Engaging Homeless Youth in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Case Study from Skid Row, Los Angeles. Health Promotion Practice, 15(1), 18–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gervais, M., & Rivard, L. (2013). “SMART” Photovoice Agricultural Consultation: Increasing Rwandan Women Farmers’ Active Participation in Development. Development in Practice, 23(4), 496–510. doi:10.1080/09614524.2013.790942.Google Scholar
Gubrium, A. (2009). Digital Storytelling: An Emergent Method for Health Promotion Research and Practice. Health Promotion Practice, 10(2), 186.Google Scholar
Gubrium, A., & Harper, K. (2016). Participatory Visual and Digital Methods. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gubrium, A., Hill, A., & Flicker, S. (2014). A Situated Practice of Ethics for Participatory Visual and Digital Methods in Public Health Research and Practice: A Focus on Digital Storytelling. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1606–1614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gubrium, A., Krause, E., & Jernigan, K. (2014). Strategic Authenticity and Voice: New Ways of Seeing and Being Seen as Young Mothers through Digital Storytelling. Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 11(4), 337–347. doi:10.1007/s13178-014-0161-x.Google Scholar
Gubrium, A., & Turner, K. C. N. (2011). Digital Storytelling as an Emergent Method for Social Research and Practice. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. (Ed.), The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research (469–491). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holtby, A., Klein, K., Cook, K., & Travers, R. (2015). To Be Seen or Not to Be Seen: Photovoice, Queer and Trans Youth, and the Dilemma of Representation. Action Research, 13(4), 317–335. doi:10.1177/1476750314566414.Google Scholar
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of Community-Based Research: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2013). From New Media Literacies to New Media Expertise. In Fraser, P. & Wardle, J. (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Media Education: Beyond the Manifesto (110–127). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joanou, J. P. (2009). The Bad and the Ugly: Ethical Concerns in Participatory Photographic Methods with Children Living and Working on the Streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies, 24(3), 214–223. doi:10.1080/14725860903309120.Google Scholar
Jordan, S. R. (2014). Research Integrity, Image Manipulation, and Anonymizing Photographs in Visual Social Science Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(4), 441–454. doi:10.1080/13645579.2012.759333.Google Scholar
Klein, K., Holtby, A., Cook, K., & Travers, R. (2015). Complicating the Coming Out Narrative: Becoming Oneself in a Heterosexist and Cissexist World. Journal of homosexuality, 62(3), 297–326.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. (2012). Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lapenta, F. (2011). Some Theoretical and Methodological Views on Photo-Elicitation. In Margolis, E. & Pauweles, L. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods (201–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Pew Research Center. (2015). Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015: Smarphones Facilitate Shifts in Communication Landscape for Teens. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/.Google Scholar
Luttrell, W. (2010). ‘A Camera Is a Big Responsibility’: A Lens for Analysing Children’s Visual Voices. Visual Studies, 25(3), 224–237. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.523274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lykes, B. (2001). Creative Arts and Photography in Participatory Action Research in Guatemala. In Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (363–371). London: Sage.Google Scholar
MacEntee, K. (2015). Using Cellphones to Discuss Cellphones: Gender-Based Violence and Girls’ Sexual Agency in and around Schools in Rural South Africa in the Age of AIDS. In Gillander Gådin, K. & Mitchell, C. (Eds.), Being Young in a Neoliberal Time: Transnational Perspectives on Challenges and Possibilities for Resistance and Social Change (31–52). Sundsvall: Forum for Gender Studies at Mid Sweden University.Google Scholar
MacEntee, K. (2016a). Girls, Condoms, Tradition, and Abstinence: Making Sense of HIV Prevention Discourses in Rural South Africa. In Mitchell, C. & Rentschler, C. (Eds.), Girlhood and the Politics of Place (315–332). New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
MacEntee, K. (2016b). Facing Constructions of African Girlhood: Reflections on Screening Participant’s Cellphilms in Academic Contexts. In MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (Eds.), What’s a Cellphilm? Mobile Digital Technology for Research and Activism (137–152). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (2016). What’s a Cellphilm? Integrating Mobile Technology into Visual Research and Activism. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
MacEntee, K., & Mandrona, A. (2015). From Discomfort to Collaboration: Teachers Screening Cellphilms in a Rural South African School. Perspectives in Education, 33(4), 43–56.Google Scholar
Milne, E.-J., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2012). Handbook of Participatory Video. Plymouth: AltaMira.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing Visual Research. Los Angeles, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2011). Community-Based Participatory Video and Social Action in Rural South Africa. In Margolis, E. & Pauwels, L. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods (171–185). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., & Moletsane, R. (2014). Me and My Cellphone: Constructing Change from the Inside through Cellphilms and Participatory Video in a Rural Community. Area, 48(4), 1–7. doi:10.1111/area.12142.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., & Moletsane, R. (2016). Poetry in a Pocket: The Cellphilms of South African Rural Women Teachers and the Poetics of the Everyday. In MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (Eds.), What’s a Cellphilm? Integrating Mobile Technology into Visual Research and Activism (19–34). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. & Sommer, M. (2016). Participatory Visual Methodologies in Global Public Health. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 521–527. doi:10.1080/17441692.2016.1170184.Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. (2010). Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4), 545–581.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2012). Global Digital Communication: Texting, Social Networking Popular Worldwide. Retrieved from www.pewglobal.org/2011/12/20/global-digital-communication-texting-social-networking-popular-worldwide/.Google Scholar
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635.Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media, and Representation in Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2003). Interdisciplinary Agendas in Visual Research: Re-Situating Visual Anthropology. Visual Studies, 18(2), 179–192.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (2014). On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 24–46. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12109.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Casares, M., & Thompson, J. (2016). Obtaining Meaningful Informed Consent: Preliminary Results of a Study to Develop Visual Informed Consent Forms with Children. Children’s Geographies, 14(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. (2006). ‘From Our Frames’: Exploring with Teachers the Pedagogic Possibilities of a Visual Arts-Based Approach to HIV and AIDS. Journal of Education, 38, 67–88.Google Scholar
Switzer, S. (2017). What’s in an Image? Towards a Critical Reading of Participatory Visual Methods. In Capous-Desyllas, M. & Morgaine, K. (Eds.), Creating Social Change through Creativity: Anti-Oppressive Arts-Based Research Methodologies. Cham, CH: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A. L., & Stuart, J. (2011). Picturing Research. Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
Wang, C. (2008). Using Photovoice as a Participatory Assessment and Issue Selection Tool. In Minkler, M. & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.), Community Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes, 2nd edn. (179–196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wang, C. & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309.Google Scholar
Warr, D., Waycott, J., & Guillemin, M. (2016). Ethical Issues in Visual Research and the Value of Stories from the Field. In Warr, D., Cox, S., Guillemin, M., & Waycott, J. (Eds.), Ethics and Visual Research Methods: Theory, Methodology, and Practice (1–16). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Weber, S. (2008). Visual Images in Research. In Knowles, J. G. & Cole, A. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research (41–54). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, C., & Flicker, S. (2015). Picturing Transactional $ex: Ethics, Challenges and Possibilities. In Gubrium, A., Harper, K., Otañez, M., & Vannini, P. (Eds.), Participatory Visual and Digital Research in Action. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×