Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:27:04.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Inflectional Endings: Conjugation

from Part 2 - Inflectional and Derivational Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

By
Ian Press
Edited by
Danko Šipka  and
Wayles Browne
Danko Šipka
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Wayles Browne
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

The Slavic languages are fusional. Categories include person, gender, number, tense, aspect, and mood. We concentrate on endings for non-past, compound tenses, aorist, imperfect, and imperative, starting from Proto-Slavic (PSL), with reference to Proto-Indo-European (PIE). The time lapse between PIE and PSL is vast, so details are largely unrecoverable. The situation in the modern Slavic languages is sketched, summarizing secondary and primary endings, roots, themes, and thematic and athematic formations. The PIE present, aorist, and optative are outlined. Morphological persistence, innovation, and loss are evident from the data, and analogy plays an important and expected role. Attention is drawn to uncertainties in the origins of the various endings, uncertainties which on the whole have been pointed out, though much is open to research and discussion. Overall, the general state of the art in the field is well-established, but there is scope for further investigation, as becomes even clearer once viewed alongside other chapters.

Keywords

inflectional endingsProto-Indo-EuropeanProto-SlavicverbpresentaoristimperfectimperativeL-participle
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics , pp. 161 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. (with the assistance of O. M. Mladenova) (2000). Intensive Bulgarian. A Textbook and Reference Grammar. Volumes 1–2, Madison, WI & London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. (2006). Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, A Grammar. With Sociolinguistic Commentary, Madison, WI & London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (1998). Slavic. In Ramat, & Ramat, , pp. 415–453.Google Scholar
Baláž, P., Darovec, M., & Trebatická, H. (1976). Slovak for Slavicists, Bratislava: SPN.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. S. P. (1995). Comparative Indo-European Linguistics. An Introduction, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W. (1993). Serbo-Croat. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 306–387.Google Scholar
Browne, W. & Alt, T. (2004). A Handbook of Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian, Durham, NC: SEELRC Duke University. https://slaviccenters.duke.edu/projects/grammars.Google Scholar
Bulaxovskij, L. A. (1958). Istoričeskij kommentarij k russkomu literaturnomu jazyku, Kyiv: Radjans’ka škola.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds. (1993). The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dalewska-Greń, H. (2012). Języki słowiańskie, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Darden, B. J. (2018). Balto-Slavic morphology. In Klein, et al., pp. 1985–1999.Google Scholar
de Bray, R. G. A. (1980). Guide to the Slavonic Languages, 3rd ed., Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Faßke, H. (1981), Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Morphologie, Bautzen: VEB Domowina-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2004). Indo-European Language and Culture. An Introduction, Oxford & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (1993). Macedonian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. L. (2006). A Short Reference Grammar of Standard Slovene, University of Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/5469/m.l.greenberg_slovene_grammar_8dec06.pdf;sequence=1.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. L. (2017). Slavic. In Kapović, , pp. 519–551.Google Scholar
Herrity, P. (2000). Slovenian: A Comprehensive Grammar, 1st ed. (2nd ed. not consulted due to Covid), London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. (1962). Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, Teil 1. Formenlehre, Halle (Saale): VEB Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kapović, M., ed., (2017). The Indo-European Languages, 2nd ed., London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kapović, M. (2017). Proto-Indo-European morphology. In Kapović, , pp. 61–110.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, V. (1963). Russische historische Grammatik, Band II. Die Entwicklung des Formensystems, Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Klein, J., Joseph, B., & Fritz, M., eds. (in cooperation with M. Wenthe) (2018). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, Vol. 3, Berlin & Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, K. (2018). The morphology of Slavic. In Klein, et al., pp. 1538–1556, especially pp. 1551–1555.Google Scholar
Lenček, R. L. (1982). The Structure and History of the Slovenian Language, Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Leskien, A. (1962). Handbuch der altbulgarischen (altkirchenslavischen) Sprache, 8th ed., Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Lundquist, J. & Yates, A. D. (2018). The morphology of Proto-Indo-European. In Klein, et al., pp. 2079–2195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, H. G. (2001). Old Church Slavonic Grammar, 7th ed., Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, P. (1993). Belorussian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 887–946.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1934). Le slave commun, 2nd ed., Paris: Institut d’Études Slaves.Google Scholar
Mykhaylyk, R. (2010). Diachronic universals and morpheme order in the Ukrainian synthetic imperfective future. Morphology, 20, 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9182-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandriş, G. (1959/1965). Handbook of Old Church Slavonic. Part 1: Old Church Slavonic Grammar, London, Toronto, & New York, NY: University of London, The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (2018). The evolution of Slavic. In Klein, et al., pp. 1600–1621.Google Scholar
Olander, T. (2015). Proto-Slavic Inflectional Morphology. A Comparative Handbook, Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polański, K. (1993). Polabian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 795–824.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. (1993). Slovenian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 388–451.Google Scholar
Ramat, A. G. & Ramat, P., eds. (1998). The Indo-European Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, especially Chapters 5 (C. Watkins), 14 (H. Andersen), and 15 (W. R. Schmalstieg.Google Scholar
Rothstein, R. A. (1993). Polish. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 686–758.Google Scholar
Scatton, E. A. (1993). Bulgarian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 188–248.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. M. (1973). Beginning Polish, 2 vols, revised ed., New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. M. (1993). Proto-Slavonic. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 60–121.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. M. (1995). The Dawn of Slavic. An Introduction to Slavic Philology, New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, W. R. (1998). Baltic. In Ramat, & Ramat, , pp. 454–479.Google Scholar
Shevelov, G. Y. (1993). Ukrainian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 947–998.Google Scholar
Short, D. (1993). Czech. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 455–532.Google Scholar
Short, D. (1993). Slovak. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 533–592.Google Scholar
Stone, G. (1993). Sorbian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 593–685.Google Scholar
Stone, G. (1993). Kashubian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 759–794.Google Scholar
Sussex, R. & Cubberley, P. (2006). The Slavic Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szemerényi, O. J. L. (1990). Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1993). Russian. In Comrie, & Corbett, , pp. 827–886.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (2004). A Reference Grammar of Russian, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. (1966). Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Tome III. Le verbe, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1969). Indogermanische Grammatik. Band III: Formenlehre. Erster Teil: Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion, Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1998). Proto-Indo-European: Comparison and reconstruction. In Ramat, & Ramat, , pp. 25–73 (especially pp. 54–67).Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1996). Studien zum sorbischen Verbum, Bautzen: VEB Domowina-Verlag.Google Scholar
Young, S. (2017). Balto-Slavic. In Kapović, , pp. 479–485.Google Scholar
Young, S. (2017). Baltic. In Kapović, pp. 486–518.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×