Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T06:13:06.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

By
Timothy Rutzou
Edited by
Peter Kivisto
Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

Realism has garnered considerable attention as a philosophical position in the history of social theory, both from its supporters, and, more often, its detractors.This article examines the history and prevalence of realism in social science; identifies the consistent philosophical features and logic of realism vis-à-vis ontology, causation, and methodology; and discusses the challenges and limitations of realism as a positon when it comes to understanding complex social phenomena.

Abduction, causation, critical realism, ontology, realism

Timothy Rutzou studied under Roy Bhaskar, earning his Ph.D. in philosophy with a dissertation on the problem of structure and difference, in which he explored tie complex relationship between critical realism and post-structuralism. He works at the interaction of philosophy and sociology, studying questions of ontology and models of causation in social science. He currently holds a teaching position at Western Sydney University.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 163 - 183
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackroyd, Stephen, and Fleetwood, Steve (eds.). 2000. Realist Perspectives on Management and Organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret. 1979. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1995. Realist Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assiter, Alison. 1996. Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aviles, Natalie, and Reed, Isaac. 2017. “Ratio via Machina: Three Standards of Mechanistic Explanation in Sociology.” Sociological Methods and Research 46(4): 715–738.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1970. “What Is a Law of Nature” In Brody, B. A. (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1998 [1979]. The Possibility of Naturalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 2008 [1975]. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Benton, Ted. 1977. Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Benton, Ted, and Craib, Ian. 2010. Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Callinicos, Alex. 2006. Resources of Critique. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Danermark, Berth, Ekström, Mats, Jakobsen, Lisolette, and Karlsson, Jan Ch.. 1997. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Decoteau, Claire. 2017. The AART of Ethnography: A Critical Realist Explanatory Research Model. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47(1): 58–82.Google Scholar
Delanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Delanda, Manuel.2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Taylor, Charles. 2015. Retrieving Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1982. “Realism.” Synthese 52: 55–112.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul, O’Mahoney, Joe, and Vincent, Steve (eds.). 2014. Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave. 2012. The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1999. “Field Labor and Ethnographic Reality.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28: 532–539.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Hallett, Tim. 2014. “Stranger and Stranger: Creating Theory through Ethnographic Distance and Authority.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 3: 188–203.Google Scholar
Frost, Samantha, and Coole, Diana (eds.). 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 2004. “The Poverty of Deductivism: A Constructive Realist Model of Sociological Explanation.” Sociological Methodology 34(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 2008. “The ECPRES Model: A Critical Realist Approach to Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” In Wittrock, Björn and Hedström, Peter (eds.), The Frontiers of Sociology (pp. 147–194). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2015. “Radical Alterity Is Just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’: A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5: 1–41.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science/Whose Knowledge? Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 1979. Social Being. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter, and Wittrock, Björn (eds.). 2009. The Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedstrӧm, Peter, and Ylikoski, Petri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review Sociology 36: 49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1777. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Selby-Biggs, A. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 2015. “The Symptomatology of Crises, Reading Crises and Learning from Them: Some Critical Realist Reflections.” Journal of Critical Realism 14(3): 238–271.Google Scholar
Kaidesoja, Tukka. 2015. Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keat, Robert, and Urry, John. 1975. Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, Tony. 1997. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, Tony.2003. Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. 2016. New Directions in the Philosophy of Social Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1968. “Methodological Individualism Reconsidered.” The British Journal of Sociology 19(2): 119–129.Google Scholar
Manicas, Peter. 1987. A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Manicas, Peter.2006. A Realist Philosophy of Social Science: Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, John Levi. 2014. Thinking through Theory. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Norrie, Alan. 1993. Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher. 1985. The Contest of Faculties. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher.1995. Truth and the Ethics of Criticism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Wendy, and Morgan, Jamie. 2005. “A Critical Epistemology of Analytical Statistics: Addressing the Skeptical Realist.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35(3): 255–284.Google Scholar
Outhwaite, William. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Pawson, Ray. 2006. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pawson, Ray.2013. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pawson, Ray, and Tilley, Nick. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Porpora, Douglas. 1993. “Cultural Rules and Material Relations.” Sociological Theory 11(2): 212–229.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1997. Representing Reality. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis.2014. “Regularities, Natural Patterns and Laws of Nature.” Theoria 79: 9–27.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, and Conant, James. 1990. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Isaac A. 2011. Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Chris, and Gatenby, Mark. 2014. “Critical Realism and Ethnography.” In Edwards, Paul K., O’Mahoney, Joe, and Vincent, Steve (eds.), Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism (pp. 132–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew.2010 [1984]. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schillbrack, Kevin. 2014. Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Scott, David. 2000. Realism and Educational Research: New Perspectives and Possibilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shotter, John. 1996. Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian. 2017. Religion: What It Is, How It Works, and Why It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 1998. “Critical Realism and Historical Sociology.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 40(1): 170–186.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George.2003. “Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and ‘Small N’s’ in Sociology.” Sociological Theory 22(3): 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1994. Interrogating Inequality: Essays on Class Analysis, Socialism and Marxism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Realism
  • Edited by Peter Kivisto, Augustana College, Illinois
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
  • Online publication: 03 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677452.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Realism
  • Edited by Peter Kivisto, Augustana College, Illinois
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
  • Online publication: 03 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677452.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Realism
  • Edited by Peter Kivisto, Augustana College, Illinois
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory
  • Online publication: 03 December 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677452.010
Available formats
×