Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T19:52:28.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Clause

An Overview of the Lexicogrammar

from Part I - SFL: The Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Geoff Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Wendy L. Bowcher
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Lise Fontaine
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
David Schönthal
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers the structure of the clause from the perspective of the metafunctional choices that give rise to it. Experiential metafunction choices (Transitivity) are shown to lead to the number and nature of the basic constituents of the clause. Interpersonal metafunction choices (Mood and Modality) have realizations threaded in among the basic constituents. Textual metafunction choices (Theme and Given/New) relate to what comes at the beginning of the clause and what comes at the end. Remembering that an important concern of SFL is that it should be appliable to text analysis, the chapter includes discussion of how ‘probes’ are used in SFL to identify instances of categories in texts. An application of SFL of particular interest to the chapter’s author is that of discovering how children learn to write in different registers. Most of the exemplification of the theoretical points is from the work of an eleven-year-old girl, who provided a variety of pieces of writing from her different school courses. There is no room in the chapter for full discussion of her registers, but by implication the chapter shows how the analysis is relevant to such a study.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, T. 2014. Analysing Power in Language: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berry, M. 1975. An Introduction to Systemic Linguistics, Volume 1: Structures and Systems. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Berry, M. 1996. What is Theme? A(nother) Personal View. In Berry, M., Butler, C. S., Fawcett, R. P., and Huang, G., eds., Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 164.Google Scholar
Berry, M. 2016. Interpersonal Meanings, with Particular Reference to Getting People to Do Things. Paper for seminar, Vigo, February 2016.Google Scholar
Berry, M. forthcoming. ‘Actually Given’ Versus ‘Presented as Given’ and ‘Actually New’ Versus ‘Presented as New’: What Happens when the ‘Presented as’ Gets out of Step with the ‘Actually’? Paper presented at the 2nd Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, Namur, Belgium, September 2016.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. 1999. On the Subject of the Subject in English. Functions of Language 6(2): 243–73.Google Scholar
Fontaine, L. 2013. Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fries, P. H. 1981. On the Status of Theme in English: Arguments from Discourse. Forum Linguisticum 6: 138.Google Scholar
Gwilliams, L. and Fontaine, L.. 2015. Indeterminacy in Process Type Classification. Functional Linguistics 2(8): 119.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure and Their Determination by Different Semantic Functions. In Webster, J. J., ed., On Grammar: Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol. 1. London: Continuum. 196218.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1992. Interpreting the Textual Metafunction. In Davies, M. and Ravelli, L., eds., Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice. London: Pinter. 3781.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M., Zappavigna, M., and Whitelaw, C.. 2009. A Survey of Process Type Classification over Difficult Cases. In Jones, C. and Ventola, E., eds., From Language to Multimodality: New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning. London: Continuum. 4764.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×