Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:54:18.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Workplace Flexibility: Strategies to Help Organizations Navigate Global Expansion

from Part VI - Organizational Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2018

By
Rebecca J. Thompson  and
Ellen Ernst Kossek
Edited by
Kristen M. Shockley ,
Winny Shen  and
Ryan C. Johnson
Kristen M. Shockley
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Winny Shen
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Ryan C. Johnson
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access

Summary

Workplace flexibility research has expanded with the global marketplace, looking beyond Western practices. Despite the relative increase in availability and use of flexibility across the globe, meaningful issues exist for researchers and organizations seeking to design and implement flexible workplace policies for multinational organizations. This chapter begins by defining and describing the primary types of workplace flexibility in the research literature. Next, broad patterns and cultural trends across major geographic regions are reviewed and discussed. Additionally, the chapter identifies key challenges and corresponding strategic outcomes of implementing workplace flexibility for multinational organizations. Finally, the chapter concludes with recommendations for areas of future research.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 533 - 554
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management review, 25(3), 472–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beham, B., Präg, P., & Drobnič, S. (2012). Who’s got the balance? A study of satisfaction with the work–family balance among part-time service sector employees in five western European countries. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(18), 3725–3741. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.654808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behson, S. J. (2005). The relative contribution of formal and informal organizational work–family support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 487–500.Google Scholar
Berg, P., Kossek, E. E., Baird, M., & Block, R. N. (2013). Collective bargaining and public policy: Pathways to work-family policy adoption in Australia and the United States. European Management Journal, 31(5), 495–504.Google Scholar
Berg, P., Kossek, E., Misra, K., & Belman, D. (2014). Do unions matter for work- life flexibility policy access and use? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 67(1), 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston College Center for Work and Families. (2007). What companies are doing, why they are doing it and what lies ahead. A report prepared for the members of the global workforce roundtable.Google Scholar
Boston College Center for Work and Families (2010). Work and family issues in Japan and the Republic of Korea: Expanding our understanding of work and family experiences in North Asia. Wallace E. Carroll School of Management.Google Scholar
Bhate, R. (2013). Flexibility at work: Employee perceptions. The Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston College.Google Scholar
Boring, N. (2017, Jan). France: Right to disconnect takes effect. Global Legal Monitor. The Library of Congress: United States. Retrieved from: www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/france-right-to-disconnect-takes-effectGoogle Scholar
Brewster, C., Mayne, L., & Tregaskis, O. (1997). Flexible working in Europe. Journal of World Business, 32(2), 133–151. doi:10.1016/S1090-9516(97)90004-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, V. (2012). Work–life balance: Eastern and Western perspectives. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 1040–1056. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.651339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, H., & Tijdens, K. (2013). Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: using company-level data across 21 countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), 1418–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, F. L., & Jing, X. (2009). Work–life balance in China: Sources of conflicts and coping strategies. NHRD Network Journal, 2(3), 18–28.Google Scholar
Dancaster, L., & Baird, M. (2016). Predictors of the adoption of work–care arrangements: a study of South African firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(4), 456–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 145–167.Google Scholar
Eurofound. (2011). Part-Time Work in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Retrieved from: www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_files/pubdocs/2010/86/en/3/EF1086EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eurofound. (2015). Workplace practices: Patterns, performance and well-being. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Retrieved: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1448&context=intlGoogle Scholar
Eurofound. (2016). Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from: www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2016/working-conditions/sixth-european-working-conditions-survey-overview-reportGoogle Scholar
Eurofound. (2017). France: New rules on working time enter into force. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from: www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/france-new-rules-on-working-time-enter-into-forceGoogle Scholar
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524.Google Scholar
Giannikis, S. K., & Mihail, D. M. (2011). Flexible work arrangements in Greece: A study of employee perceptions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 417–432. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.540163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays Recruitment. (2016). 2016 Hays Salary Guide – Asia. Retrieved from: www.hays.cn/cs/groups/hays_common/@cn/@content/documents/digitalasset/hays_314891.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hill, J., Grzywacz, J., Allen, S., Blanchard, V., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, 11, 149–163.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied psychology, 50(3), 337–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesmin, S. S., & Seward, R. R. (2011). Parental leave and fathers’ involvement with children in Bangladesh: A comparison with United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Thompson, R. J., & Burke, L. B. (2014). Leveraging workplace flexibility: Fostering engagement and productivity. SHRM Foundation’s Effective Practice Guidelines Series. Alexandra, VA: SHRM Foundation.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced Workplace Flexibility. California Management Review, 57(4), 5–25.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., & Lee, M. (2008). Implementing a reduced-workload arrangement to retain high talent: A case study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 49–64.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. (2011). Flexible work scheduling. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial-Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 535–572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta‐analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family‐specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., & Thompson, R. J. (2016). Workplace flexibility: Integrating employer and employee perspectives to close the research–practice implementation gap. In Allen, T. & Eby, L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Family, 255.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Su, R., & Wu, L (2016). “Opting out” or “pushed out”? Integrating perspectives on women’s career equality for gender inclusion and interventions. Journal of Management, 43, 228–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. D., MacDermid, S. M., & Buck, M. L. (2000). Organizational paradigms of reduced-load work: Accommodation, elaboration, and transformation. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1211–1226.Google Scholar
MacVaugh, J., & Evans, J. (2012). A re-examination of flexible employment practices in Japan. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(6), 1245–1258. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.561237Google Scholar
Matos, K., & Galinsky, E. (2014). 2014 National Study of Employers. Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
Myers, C. G. (2016). Where in the world are the workers? Cultural underrepresentation in IO research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(01), 144–152.Google Scholar
Patrick, R. (2012). Work as the primary ‘duty’ of the responsible citizen: a critique of this work-centric approach. People, Place & Policy Online, 6(1).Google Scholar
Raghuram, S., London, M., & Larsen, H. H. (2001). Flexible employment practices in Europe: Country versus culture. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(5), 738–753. doi:10.1080/09585190110047811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robila, M. (2012). Family policies in Eastern Europe: A focus on parental leave. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(1), 32–41. doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9421-4Google Scholar
Sabattini, L., & Carter, N. M. (2012). Expanding work–life perspectives: Talent management in Asia. New York, NY: Catalyst.Google Scholar
Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 479–493. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006Google Scholar
Simard, C., Henderson, A. D., Gilmartin, S. K., Schiebinger, L., & Whitney, T. (2008). Climbing the technical ladder: Obstacles and solutions for mid-level women in technology. Clayman, Michelle R. Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University, Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology.Google Scholar
Smit, R. (2011). Family-related policies in Southern African countries: Are working parents reaping any benefits? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
Smith, L., Folkard, S., Tucker, P., & Macdonald, I. (1998). Work shift duration: a review comparing eight hour and 12 hour shift systems. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(4), 217–229.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., … & Lu, L. (2004). A cross‐national comparative study of work‐family stressors, working hours, and well‐being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 119–142.Google Scholar
Stavrou, E. T., Casper, W. J., & Ierodiakonou, C. (2015). Support for part-time work as a channel to female employment: the moderating effects of national gender empowerment and labour market conditions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 688–706.Google Scholar
Stavrou, E., & Kilaniotis, C. (2010). Flexible work and turnover: An empirical investigation across cultures. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 541–554.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 392–415.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. J., Payne, S. C., & Taylor, A. B. (2015). Applicant attraction to flexible work arrangements: Separating the influence of flextime and flexplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 726–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Labor (1993). Wage and Hour Division. Family and Medical Leave Act. Retrieved from www.dol.gov/whd/fmlaGoogle Scholar
US Office of Personnel Management (2011). Guide to telework in the federal government. Retrieved from: www.telework.gov/guidance-legislation/telework-guidance/telework-guide/guide-to-telework-in-the-federal-government.pdfGoogle Scholar
Van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (1999). Protecting women and promoting equality in the labor market: Theory and evidence. World Bank, Development Research Group, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., Kossek, E., & Lobel, S. (2007). Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support work–life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB. Human Relations, 60(8), 1123–1154.Google Scholar
Voyandoff, P. (2005). Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and perceived stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 491–503. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.491Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×