Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T09:40:26.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Constructionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Yasmin B. Kafai
Affiliation:
University of California
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Learning sciences researchers are unified by their deep commitment to radically transform learning – away from the transmission and acquisition style associated with lectures and quizzes, to a more active, participatory learning style. Perhaps the first scholar to realize that computers provided schools with an opportunity to do so was Seymour Papert, who created the now-famous Logo programming language. Papert, who received two doctorates in mathematics, expanded his career by studying cognitive development with Jean Piaget, the founder of constructivism – one of the theoretical foundations of today's learning sciences. After leaving Piaget's lab in Switzerland, Papert took a faculty position at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he cofounded the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory with Marvin Minsky. In the 1970s, Papert began to expand the psychological insights of Piaget's constructivism into pedagogical principles, providing a template that later influenced many learning sciences researchers.

When Papert's book Mindstorms was published in 1980 the term constructionism had yet to be coined. In this book and subsequent publications he advanced a theory of learning, teaching, and design. Many took the notion of “children, computers and powerful ideas” (to quote the subtitle of his book) as a rather simplistic version of Piagetian discovery learning with the Logo programming language when, in fact, the opposite applied. Constructionism is not constructivism, as Piaget never intended his theory of knowledge development to be a theory of learning and teaching; nor is constructionist learning simply discovery learning and thus opposed to any forms of instruction; and last, in constructionism, people and not computers are seen as the driving force for educational change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ching, C. C. (2000). Apprenticeship, learning and technology: Children as oldtimers and newcomers in the culture of learning through design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, Learning and Literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, L. (1998). Embodying mathematics and science: Microworlds as representations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, M. (2003). Mindstuff: Educational technology beyond the computer. Convergence, 4, 45–76.Google Scholar
Furth, H. G. (1987). Knowledge as desire: An essay on Freud and Piaget. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harel, I. (1990). Children designers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kafai, Y. B. (1996). Gender differences in children's constructions of video games. In Greenfield, Patricia M. & Cocking, Rodney R. (Eds.), Interacting with video (pp. 39–66). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students' science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 323–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafai, Y. B., Franke, M., Ching, C., & Shih, J. (1998). Games as interactive learning environments fostering teachers' and students' mathematical thinking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(2), 149–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kafai, Y. B., & Roberts, M. (2002). On becoming junior software designers. In Stevens, R. & Bell, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 191–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. (2000). Planning in context: A situated view of children's management of science projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Martin, F. (1996). Ideal and real systems: A study of notions of control in undergraduates who design robots. In Kafai, Y. & Resnick, M. (Eds.), Constructionism in practice (pp. 255–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Martin, F. (2001). Robotic Explorations: A Hands-on introduction to engineering. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kuwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, D. (1990). Programming language/problem-solving research: A review of relevant issues. Review of Educational Research, 45, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papert, S. (1980/1993). Mindstorms (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism versus technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 24–28.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1997). Tinkering towards utopia: A century of public school reform. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R., & Kurland, M. (1984). On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas in Psychology, 2(2), 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, M. (1991). New paradigms for computing, new paradigms for thinking. In Kafai, Y. & Resnick, M. (Eds.), Constructionism in Practice (pp. 255–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for life long learning. In Educational Technology, Research & Development, 46(4), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, M., & Ocko, S. (1991). LEGO/Logo: Learning through and about design. In Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 141–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Resnick, M., Rusk, N., & Cooke, S. (1998). The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner-city. In Schon, D., Sanyal, B., & Mitchell, W. (Eds.), High Technology and Low Income Communities (pp. 266–286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1998). Diving into complexity: Developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(2), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism and the reevaluation of the concrete. Signs, 16(1), 128–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Constructionism
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Constructionism
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Constructionism
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.004
Available formats
×