Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:14:23.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Emotion and Various Forms of Job Performance

from Part II - Workplace Affect and Individual Worker Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

Liu-Qin Yang
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Russell Cropanzano
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Catherine S. Daus
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Get access

Summary

The employee outcome that has the greatest impact on organizational functioning is job performance in its various forms. Most of the literature directed toward understanding job performance has tended to focus on individual factors, such as ability and personality, as well as environmental conditions that might affect it, such as leadership. Far less attention has been given to the role of emotions in performance, except, perhaps, for emotion as a personality trait. In this chapter I will review the literature on different forms of emotion – that is, emotional traits, emotional states, and emotion regulation (emotional labor) – and how they relate to various aspects of performance, specifically counterproductive work behavior (behaviors that harm organizations and organization stakeholders), organizational citizenship behavior (positive performance behavior that goes beyond assigned tasks), task performance, and safety performance (following safety rules in carrying out the job).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvan, M. L., Shimon, Y., & Kessler, S. R. (2015). Examining temporal precedence in the relationship between customer mistreatment and customer CWB. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association, St. Petersburg Beach.Google Scholar
Baka, Ł. (2015). How do negative emotions regulate the effects of workplace aggression on counterproductive work behaviours? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(3), 326335.Google Scholar
Banks, G. C., Whelpley, C. E., Oh, I.-S., & Shin, K. (2012). (How) are emotionally exhausted employees harmful? International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 198216, doi:10.1037/a0029249Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, J. A., & Spector, P. E. (2015). Discrete negative emotions and counterproductive work behavior. Human Performance, 28(4), 307331, doi:10.1080/08959285.2015.1021040Google Scholar
Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613636, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026739Google Scholar
Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410424, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beus, J. M., Dhanani, L. Y., & McCord, M. A. (2015). A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 481498, doi:10.1037/a0037916Google Scholar
Bluen, S. D., Barling, J., & Burns, W. (1990). Predicting sales performance, job satisfaction, and depression by using the Achievement Strivings and Impatience–Irritability dimensions of Type A behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 212216, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599670, doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1153260Google Scholar
Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P., Van Harrison, R., & Penneau, S. R. (1980). Job demands and worker health. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Catino, M., & Patriotta, G. (2013). Learning from errors: Cognition, emotions and safety culture in the Italian Air Force. Organization Studies, 34(4), 437467, doi:10.1177/0170840612467156Google Scholar
Chang, C.-H., Johnson, R. E., & Yang, L.-Q. (2007). Emotional strain and organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis and review. Work & Stress, 21(4), 312332, doi:10.1080/02678370701758124Google Scholar
Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 11401166, doi:10.1037/a0024004Google Scholar
Clarke, S., & Robertson, I. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 355376, doi:10.1348/096317905X26183Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 12411255, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417440.Google Scholar
Erez, A., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 12701279, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Farnese, M. L. (2015). “Yes, I Can”: the protective role of personal self-efficacy in hindering counterproductive work behavior under stressful conditions. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(5), 479499, doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.969718Google Scholar
Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Fontaine, R. G., Barbaranelli, C., & Farnese, M. L. (2015). An integrative approach to understanding counterproductive work behavior: The roles of stressors, negative emotions, and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 131144, doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2209-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of work frustration–aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 915931, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199911%2920:6%3C915::AID-JOB918%3E3.0.CO;2-63.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K., & Kessler, S. R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 199220, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02032.xGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A., & Melloy, R. C. (2017). The state of the heart: Emotional labor as emotion regulation reviewed and revised. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 407422, doi:10.1037/ocp0000067Google Scholar
Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 2444.Google Scholar
Hülsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. (2011). On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 361389, doi:10.1037/a002287610.1037/a0022876.supp (Supplemental)Google Scholar
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 5478, doi:10.1037/a0017286Google Scholar
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Rubenstein, A. L., Long, D. M., Odio, M. A., Buckman, B. R., Zhang, Y., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2013). A meta-analytic structural model of dispositonal affectivity and emotional labor. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 4790, doi:10.1111/peps.12009Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 162176, doi:10.1037/a0013115Google Scholar
Kidwell, B., Hardesty, D. M., Murtha, B. R., & Sheng, S. (2011). Emotional intelligence in marketing exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 7895.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Park, Y., & Niu, Q. K. (2017). Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 2844, doi:10.1002/job.2109Google Scholar
Krischer, M. M., Penney, L. M., & Hunter, E. M. (2010). Can counterproductive work behaviors be productive? CWB as emotion-focused coping. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(2), 154166, doi:10.1037/a0018349Google Scholar
Li, F., Jiang, L., Yao, X., & Li, Y. (2013). Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: The roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 51, 243251, doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.029Google Scholar
Matta, F. K., Erol-Korkmaz, H. T., Johnson, R. E., & Biçaksiz, P. (2014). Significant work events and counterproductive work behavior: The role of fairness, emotions, and emotion regulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 920944, doi:10.1002/job.1934Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17(4), 433442, https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(93)90010-3Google Scholar
McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 836844.Google Scholar
Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2013). Reciprocal effects of work stressors and counterproductive work behavior: A five-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 529539, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031732Google Scholar
Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2017). Are the emotionally intelligent good citizens or counterproductive? A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and its relationships with organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 144156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.015Google Scholar
Piotrowski, C. (2013). Counterproductive Work Behavior: Topical domain in emergent research. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 40(3), 7880.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theroetical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513563, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555572, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256693Google Scholar
Rotundo, M., & Xie, J. L. (2008). Understanding the domain of counterproductive work behaviour in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(5), 856877, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190801991400Google Scholar
Rupprecht, E. A., Kueny, C. R., Shoss, M. K., & Metzger, A. J. (2016). Getting what you want: How fit between desired and received leader sensitivity influences emotion and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(4), 443454, doi:10.1037/a0040074Google Scholar
Salminen, S., Perttula, P., Hirvonen, M., Perkiö-Mäkelä, M., & Vartia, M. (2017). Link between haste and occupational injury. Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 56(1), 119124, doi:10.3233/WOR-162471Google Scholar
Sharma, A., & Levy, M. (2003). Salespeople’s affect toward customers: Why should it be important for retailers? Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 523528, doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00248-XGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K. M., Ispas, D., Rossi, M. E., & Levine, E. L. (2012). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance, 25(5), 377411, doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.721832Google Scholar
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434443, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Che, X. X. (2014). Re-examining citizenship: How the control of measurement artifacts affects observed relationships of organizational citizenship behavior and organizational variables. Human Performance, 27(2), 165182, doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.882928Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269292, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822%2802%2900049-9Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In Fox, S & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010a). Counterproductive work behavior and organisational citizenship behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59(1), 2139, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00414.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010b). Theorizing about the deviant citizen: An attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 132143, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.06.002Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446460, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005Google Scholar
Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219230, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 7793, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00297.xGoogle Scholar
Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S., III, & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 586597.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465490, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 10631070, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063Google Scholar
Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 259295, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01138.xGoogle Scholar
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (2008). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology, 18, 459482.Google Scholar
Yeung, D. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2012). Impacts of suppression on emotional responses and performance outcomes: An experience-sampling study in younger and older workers. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(6), 666676, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr159Google Scholar
Yue, Y., Wang, K. L., & Groth, M. (2016). The impact of surface acting on coworker-directed voluntary workplace behaviours. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 447458, doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1111874Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×