Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:43:00.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Amateurs and Professionals

from PART I - WORKERS AND PLACES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

By
David Allen
Edited by
Peter J. Bowler  and
John V. Pickstone
Peter J. Bowler
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
John V. Pickstone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Science in the nineteenth century underwent major transformations. The immense growth of knowledge encouraged subdivision into increasingly narrow and self-contained areas of specialization. Science changed from an area of learning in which it was exceptional for people to be paid to pursue it into one in which large numbers were receiving instruction in schools and universities with the expectation of making their living from it. Science turned into a substantial profession, but the process of professionalization was not automatic. In most developed countries, there were conditions inimical to it, and when the change eventually took place, it did so comparatively abruptly and generated considerable tension. This compression has been a boon to historians, for it provides them with a clearly marked stratum dividing the preexisting world of science from the very different one that emerged shortly afterward.

THE PREPROFESSIONAL ERA

Until the 1880s, it is unhelpful and misleading to employ the categories “amateur” and “professional.” Whereas “amateur” has come to acquire a derogatory overtone, especially in the United States, it was the “professional” who was despised in the early nineteenth century. A professional was someone who received money to do something that others did for pleasure, and to put one’s labor up for hire placed one in the position of a servant. This aristocratic prejudice had trickled down into the upper middle class and restricted the range of occupations members of that class could follow.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 13 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, Marianrie G., “The Contribution of the Amateur to North American Ornithology: A Historical Perspective,” Living Bird, 18 (1979), at p. 169.Google Scholar
Allen, D. E., “The Early Professionals in British Natural History,” in From Linnaeus to Darwin: Commentaries on the History of Biology and Geology, ed. Wheeler, Alwyne and Price, James H. (London: Society for the History of Natural History, 1985).Google Scholar
Allen, D. E., “Walking the Swards: Medical Education and the Rise and Spread of the Botanical Field Class,” Archives of Natural History, 27 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. E., “The Natural History Society in Britain through the Years,” Archives of Natural History, 14 (1987).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, D. E., The Botanists: A History of the Botanical Society of the British Isles through 150 Years (Winchester: St. Paul’s Bibliographies, 1986).Google Scholar
Allen, D. E., “The Biological Societies of London, 1870–1914: Their Interrelations and Their Responses to Change,” Linnean, 4 (1988).Google Scholar
Allen, D. E., “J. F. M. Dovaston, an Overlooked Pioneer of Field Ornithology,” Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 4 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. E., The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History (London: Allen Lane, 1976), p..Google Scholar
Allen, D. E., The Victorian Fern Craze: A History of Pteridomania (London: Hutchinson, 1969);Google Scholar
Allen, D. E., “Changing Attitudes to Nature Conservation: The Botanical Perspective,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 32 (1987);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Toby A., “Organizing Biology: The American Society of Naturalists and Its Affiliated Societies,” in The American Development of Biology, ed. Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith R., and Maienschein, Jane (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Baker, R. A. and Bayliss, R. A., “The Amateur and Professional Scientist: A Comment on Louis C. Miall (1842–1921),” Naturalist, 110 (1985).Google Scholar
Barrow, Mark V., A Passion for Birds: American Ornithology after Audubon (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997), p..Google Scholar
Bates, Ralph, Scientific Societies in the United States, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bennett, Thomas Peter, “The History of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia,” in Contributions to the History of North American Natural History, ed. Wheeler, Alwyne (London: Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 1983);Google Scholar
Benson, Keith R. and Quinn, C. Edward, “The American Society of Zoologists, 1889–1989: A Century of Interpreting the Biological Sciences,” American Zoologist, 30 (1990);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Carl, Science, God, and Nature in Victorian Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983), p..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Morris, “‘Hegemony’ and the Amateur Tradition in British Science,” Journal of Social History, 8 (1974).Google Scholar
Bower, F. O., Sixty Years of Botany in Britain (1875–1935): Impressions of an Eye-Witness (London: Macmillan, 1938), p..Google Scholar
[Britten, J.], “Local Scientific Societies,” Nature, 9 (1873);Google Scholar
Campbell, Bruce, “Co-operation in Zoological Studies,” Discovery, II (1950).Google Scholar
Cittadino, Eugene, “Ecology and the Professionalization of Botany in America, 1890–1905,” Studies in the History of Biology, 4 (1980).Google Scholar
Coats, Alice M., The Quest for Plants: A History of the Horticultural Explorers (London: Studio Vista, 1969).Google Scholar
Dandy, J. E., Watsonian Vice-Counties of Great Britain (London: Ray Society, 1969).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, “Redefining the X Axis: ‘Professionals,’ ‘Amateurs’ and the Making of Mid-Victorian Biology,” Journal of the History of Biology, 34 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, Ray, The India Museum, 1801–1879 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1982).Google Scholar
Doughty, Robin W., Feather Fashions and Bird Preservation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Ducker, Sophie, “History of Australian Phycology: Early German Collectors and Botanists,” in History in the Service of Systematics, ed. Wheeler, Alwyne and Price, James H. (London: Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 1981).Google Scholar
Dutcher, William, “History of the Audubon Movement,” Bird-Lore, 7 (1905);Google Scholar
Faase, Patricia, Between Seasons and Science (Amsterdam: SPB Academic, 1995).Google Scholar
Farber, Paul Lawrence, The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982), p.;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, Paul L., “The Transformation of Natural History in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Biology, 15 (1982);Google Scholar
Fox, Robert, “The Savant Confronts His Peers: Scientific Societies in France, 1815–1914,” in The Organization of Science and Technology in France, 1808–1914, ed. Fox, Robert and Weisz, George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), see p. 258.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Neal C., “Preparing for Darwin: Conchology and Natural Theology in Anglo-American Natural History,” Studies in the History of Biology, 7 (1984).Google Scholar
Graham, Frank, Jr., The Audubon Ark: A History of the National Audubon Society (New York: Knopf, 1990).Google Scholar
Green, J. Reynolds, A History of Botany in the United Kingdom from the Earliest Times to the End of the 19th Century (London: Dent, 1914).Google Scholar
Guralnick, Stanley M., “The American Scientist in Higher Education, 1820–1910,” in The Sciences in the American Context: New Perspectives, ed. Reingold, Nathan (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Hagen, Joel B., “Evolutionists and Taxonomists: Divergent Traditions in Twentieth-Century Plant Geography,” Journal of the History of Biology, 19 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, Melville H., “Entomology in Search of a Soul,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 47 (1954), at p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, S. W. F., “The Apothecaries’ Act, 1815: A Reinterpretation,” Medical History, 10 (1966).Google ScholarPubMed
Huxley, Julian, Memories (London: Allen and Unwin, 1970);Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian, “Bird-Watching and Biological Science: Some Observations on the Study of Courtship,” Auk, 35 (1916):;Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian, ed., The New Systematics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Jackson, B. Daydon, “The Late George Bentham, F. R. S.,” Journal of Botany, 22 (1884).Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. W., “Science, Sentimentalism or Social Control? The Nature Study Movement in England and Wales, 1899–1914,” History of Education, 10 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargon, Robert H., Science in Victorian Manchester: Enterprise and Expertise (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Keeney, Elizabeth B., The Botanizers: Amateur Scientists in Nineteenth-Century America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992), p..Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S., “Fifty and One Years of the Geologists’ Association,” Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 58 (1948).Google Scholar
Kloos, A. W., “The Study of Plant Distribution in Holland,” in The Study of the Distribution of British Plants, ed. Lousley, J. E. (Oxford: Botanical Society of the British Isles, 1951);Google Scholar
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory, “The Nineteenth-Century Amateur Tradition: The Case of the Boston Society of Natural History,” in Science and Its Public: The Changing Relationship, ed. Holton, Gerald and Blanpied, William A. (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976);Google Scholar
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory, “Savants and Professionals: The American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1848–1860,” in The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic, ed. Oleson, Alexandra and Brown, Sanborn C. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Laissus, Yves, “Les Societes Savantes et l’Avancement des Sciences Naturelles: Les Musees d’Histoire Naturelle,” in Actes du Congres National des Societes Savantes (Paris: Bibliotheque Nationale, 1976), see p. 47;Google Scholar
Lemon, F. E., “The Story of the R. S. P. B.,” Bird Notes and News, 20 (1943);Google Scholar
Lowe, Philip, “The British Association and the Provincial Public,” in The Parliament of Science: The British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1831–1981, ed. MacLeod, Roy and Collins, Peter (Northwood: Science Reviews, 1981), see p. 132.Google Scholar
Maienschein, Jane, Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Morrell, J. B., “Individualism and the Structure of British Science in 1830,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, J. B., Science at Oxford: 1914–1939 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, J. G. and Meadows, A. J., “Specialization and Professionalization in British Geology,” Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976);Google Scholar
Palmer, E. L., “Fifty Years of Nature Study and the American Nature Study Society,” Nature Magazine, 50 (1957);Google Scholar
Pearson, T. Gilbert, “Fifty Years of Bird Protection,” in Fifty Years’ Progress of American Ornithology, 1883–1933, ed. Chapman, Frank M. and Palmer, T. S. (Lancaster, Pa.: American Ornithologists’ Union, 1933);Google Scholar
Porter, Charlotte M., The Eagle’s Nest: Natural History and American Ideas, 1812–1842 (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, “Gentlemen and Geology: The Emergence of a Scientific Career, 1660–1920,” Historical Journal, 21 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, “The Contribution of the Morphological Tradition: American Palaeontology, 1880–1910,” Journal of the History of Biology, 14 (1981).Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S., The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydzewski, W., “A Historical Review of Bird Marking,” Dansk Ornithologisk Forening Tidsskrift, 45 (1951).Google Scholar
Secord, Anne, “Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth Century Lancashire,” History of Science, 32 (1979);Google Scholar
Secord, Anne, “Artisan Botany,” in Cultures of Natural History, ed. Jardine, N., Secord, J. A., and Spary, E. C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Shteir, Ann B., Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996);Google Scholar
Smit, P., “Van Floristiek tot Moleculaire Biologie: 125 Jaren Koninklijke Nederlandse Botanische Vereniging,” Jaarboek van de KNBV over het jaar 1970 (Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Botanische Vereniging, 1971);Google Scholar
Sorensen, W. Conner, Brethren of the Net: American Entomology, 1840–1880 (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Stainton, H. T., “At Home,” Entomologists’ Weekly Intelligencer, 5 (1859);Google Scholar
Stresemann, Erwin, Ornithology from Aristotle to the Present, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975), p..Google Scholar
Thackray, Arnold, “Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model,” American Historical Review, 791 (1974);Google Scholar
Walters, S. M., “Distribution Maps of Plants – An Historical Survey,” in Progress in the Study of the British Flora, ed. Lousley, J. E. (London: Botanical Society of the British Isles, 1951).Google Scholar
Ward, Harold B., “The History of Bird Banding,” Auk, 62 (1945);Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×