Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:44:15.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Science and Religion

from Part V - Ramifications and Impacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Roy Porter
Affiliation:
Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
Get access

Summary

Commentaries on the Enlightenment often propose a highly schematic account of the changing relations between science and religion. Whereas the seventeenth century is credited with a notional “separation” of the sciences from religious control, the eighteenth is characterized by a more devastating form of secularization in which the methods and conclusions of the natural philosophers were turned against the authority of the established Churches. With carefully selected examples, this story can be attractive and plausible. Early in the seventeenth century, Francis Bacon (1561–1626) had warned against the mixing of biblical exegesis with natural philosophy, and, in France, René Descartes (1596–1650) had mechanized a universe no longer anthropocentric. Both men had devised stringent criteria that truth claims had to meet and both had rejected final causes from the explanation of natural phenomena. During the second half of the seventeenth century, enduring scientific societies had come into existence in both London and Paris, and within them religious disputation was banned. By the end of the century, Isaac Newton (1642–1727) had articulated his laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, laws that to later generations would symbolize a universe characterized by order and regularity rather than divine caprice.

Newton is brought within the schema in other ways. If his Principia was a towering monument to the power of mathematical reasoning, his Opticks displayed the power of a rigorous experimental method. Seemingly the stage was set for the displacement of theology, once the queen of the sciences, by more bracing sciences that promised an improvement of the world and a brighter destiny for humankind.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooke, John Hedley, Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley, “Science and Theology in the Enlightenment,” in Richardson, W. Mark and Wildman, Wesley J. (eds.), Religion and Science: History, Method, Dialogue (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley, “‘A Sower Went Forth’: Joseph Priestley and the Ministry of Reform,” in Schwarz, A. Truman and McEvoy, John G. (eds.), Motion Toward Perfection: The Achievement of Joseph Priestley (Boston: Skinner House, 1990).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd, The Image of Newton and Locke in the Age of Reason (London: Sheed and Ward, 1961).Google Scholar
Buckley, Michael J., At the Origins of Modern Atheism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Burbridge, David, “William Paley, Erasmus Darwin, and the System of Appetencies: Natural Theology and Evolutionism in the Eighteenth Century,” Science and Christian Belief, 10 (1998).Google Scholar
Burke, Peter, “Religion and Secularisation,” in The New Cambridge Modern History, vol. 13 (Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, John P., “Gottesbeweise,” in Krause, Gerhard and Müller, Gerhard (eds.), Theologische Realenzyklopädie (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1984).Google Scholar
Clayton, John P., “Thomas Jefferson and the Study of Religion,” an Inaugural Lecture (Lancaster: Lancaster University, 1992).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard, Benjamin Franklin’s Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Crosland, Maurice, “The Image of Science as a Threat: Burke versus Priestley and the ‘Philosophic Revolution,’British Journal for the History of Science, 20 (1987).Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, “How the Principia Got Its Name,” History of Science, 29 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, Robert, The Business of Enlightenment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo, The Janus Faces of Genius (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Force, James E., William Whiston: Honest Newtonian (Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Force, , “Biblical Interpretation, Newton, and English Deism,” in Vanderjagt, Arjo (ed.), Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Leiden: Brill, 1993).Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos, Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gascoigne, John, “From Bentley to the Victorians: The Rise and Fall of British Newtonian Natural Theology,” Science in Context, i (1988)Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A., Hume’s Philosophy of Religion, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Neal C., “Natural History, Natural Theology and Social Order: John Ray and the ‘Newtonian Ideology,’Journal of the History of Biology, 20 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Neal C., “Divine Design and the Industrial Revolution,” Isis, 81 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinski, Jan, Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820 (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hahn, Roger, “Laplace and the Mechanistic Universe,” in Lindberg, David C. and Numbers, Ronald L. (eds.), God and Nature (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Houston, J., Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume (Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, Peter and Jordanova, Ludmilla, “Introduction,” in Hulme, Peter and Jordanova, Ludmilla (eds.), The Enlightenment and its Shadows (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Hume, David, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, and The Natural History of Religion, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A. (Oxford: World’s Classics, 1993).Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael and Wootton, David (eds.), Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C., “John Toland and the Newtonian Ideology,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 32 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas, The Scenes of Inquiry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Jordanova, Ludmilla, “Nature’s Powers: A Reading of Lamarck’s Distinction Between Creation and Production,” in Moore, James R. (ed.), History, Humanity and Evolution (Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Knight, David, The Transcendental Part of Chemistry (Folkestone: Dawson, 1978)Google Scholar
Knight, , Humphry Davy: Science and Power (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Kors, A. C., D’Holbach’s Coterie: An Enlightenment in Paris (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Laudan, Rachel, From Mineralogy to Geology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Fourth Paper…,” in Alexander, H. G. (ed.), The Leibniz Clarke Correspondence (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy, The Strategy of Life (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982).Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., Reflections on the Study of Nature (1754), trans. Smith, J. E. (1786)Google Scholar
Goodman, David, Buffon’s Natural History (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Mackie, John L., The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Massey, Marilyn Chapin, Christ Unmasked: The Meaning of the “Life of Jesus” in German Politics (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983).Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., “Newton on Place, Space, Time and God,” British Journal for the History of Science, 11 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neil, W., “The Criticism and Theological Uses of the Bible, 1700–1950,” in Greenslade, S. L. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the Bible (Cambridge University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Orange, Derek, “Rational Dissent and Provincial Science: William Turner and the Newcastle Literary and Philosophical Society,” in Inkster, Ian and Morrell, Jack (eds.), Metropolis and Province (London: Hutchinson, 1983).Google Scholar
Outram, Dorinda, The Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Pailin, David, “What Is Natural Religion?” in Sharma, Arvind (ed.), The Sum of our Choices (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H., Isaac La Peyrère (1596–1676): His Life, Work and Influence (Leiden: Brill, 1987).Google Scholar
Porter, Roy and Teich, Mikuláš (eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context (Cambridge University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy, Doctor of Society: Thomas Beddoes and the Sick Trade in Late Enlightenment England (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Roe, Shirley A., Matter, Life and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate (Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century,” History of Science, 21 (1983)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapin, Steven, “Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes,” Isis, 72 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Roger, The Fontana History of the Human Sciences (London: Fontana, 1997).Google Scholar
Stewart, Dugald, Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, vol. I, in Hamilton, WilliamSir (ed.), The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart (Edinburgh: Constable, 1854), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Stewart, Larry, The Rise of Public Science (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Stewart, Larry, “Seeing Through the Scholium: Religion and Reading Newton in the Eighteenth Century,” History of Science, 34 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackray, Arnold, “Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model,” American Historical Review, 79 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torlais, Jean, Un Physicien au Siècle des Lumières: L’Abbé Nollet, 1700–1770 (Paris: Sipuco, 1954), and Home, R. W., Electricity and Experimental Physics in Eighteenth-Century Europe (Aldershot: Variorum, 1992).Google Scholar
Vartanian, Aram, “Trembley’s Polyp, La Mettrie and Eighteenth-Century French Materialism,” in Wiener, P. and Noland, A. (eds.), Roots of Scientific Thought (New York: Basic Books, 1957).Google Scholar
Voltaire, , “Sermon of the Fifty,” in Gay, Peter (ed.), Deism: An Anthology (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1968).Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., Force in Newton’s Physics (London: Macdonald, 1978).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Science and Religion
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.033
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Science and Religion
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.033
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Science and Religion
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.033
Available formats
×