Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T16:17:55.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - A Twisted Tale: Women in the Physical Sciences in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries

from Part I - The Public Cultures of the Physical Sciences After 1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Margaret Rossiter
Edited by
Mary Jo Nye
Mary Jo Nye
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Summary

Dismissed as inconsequential before the 1970s, the history of the contributions of women to the physical sciences has become a topic of considerable research in the last two decades. Best known of the women physical scientists are the three “great exceptions” from central Europe – Sonya Kovalevsky, Marie Sklodowska Curie, and Lise Meitner– but in recent years, other women and other countries and areas have been receiving attention, and more is to be expected in the future. The overall pattern for most women in these fields, the nonexceptions, has been one of ghettoization and subsequent attempts to overcome barriers.

PRECEDENTS

Before 1800 there were several self-taught and privately-tutored “learned ladies” in the physical sciences. Included were the English self-styled “natural philosopher” Margaret Cavendish (1623–1673), who wrote books and in the 1660s visited the Royal Society of London, which had not elected her to membership; the German astronomer Maria Winkelmann Kirch (1670– 1720), who worked for the then-new Berlin Academy of Sciences in the early 1700s; the Frenchwoman Emilie du Chatelet (1706–1749), who translated Newton’s Principia into French before her premature death in childbirth in 1749; the Italians Laura Bassi (1711–1778), famed professor of physics at the University of Bologna, and Maria Agnesi (1718–1799), a mathematician in Bologna; Ekaterina Romanovna Dashkova (1743–1810), the director of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Russia; and Marie Anne Lavoisier (1758– 1836), who helped her husband Antoine with his work in the Chemical Revolution.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 54 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

References

Abbott, Allison, “Europe’s Poorer Regions Woo Researchers,” Nature, 388 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albisetti, James C., “American Women’s Colleges Through European Eyes, 1865–1914,” History of Education Quarterly, 32 (Winter 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Nessy, “Textile Physics and the Wool Industry: An Australian Woman Scientist’s Contribution,” Agricultural History, 67 (1993).Google Scholar
Allen, Nessy, “Achievement in Science: The Careers of Two Australian Women Chemists,” Historical Records of Australian Science, 10 (December 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arianrhod, Robyn, “Physics and Mathematics, Reality and Language: Dilemmas for Feminists,” in The Knowledge Explosion: Generations of Feminist Scholarship, ed. Kramarae, Cheris and Spender, Dale (New York: Teachers College Press, 1992), chap. 2.Google Scholar
Benczer-Koller, N., “Personal Memories of Chien-Shiung Wu,” Physics and Society, 26, no. 3 (July 1997).Google Scholar
Bonner, Thomas N., To the Ends of the Earth: Women’s Search for Education in Medicine (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, Louis L. and Dworsky, NancySophie Germain: An Essay in the History of the Theory of Elasticity (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, E. Margaret, “Watcher of the Skies,“ Annual Reviews of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 32 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Patricia Cline, A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Couture-Cherki, Monique, “Women in [French] Physics,” in Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven, The Radicalisation of Science: Ideology of the Natural Sciences (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1976), chap. 3.Google Scholar
Curie, Eve, Madame Curie, trans. Sheean, Vincent (Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday Doran, 1938).Google Scholar
Dash, Joan, A Life of One’s Own (New York: Harper and Row, 1973).Google Scholar
Davis, J. L., “The Research School of Marie Curie in the Paris Faculty, 1907–1914,” Annals of Science, 52 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kathleen A., “Katharine Blodgett and Thin Films,” Journal of Chemical Education, 61 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrick, M. Elizabeth, “Agnes Pockels, 1862–1935,” Journal of Chemical Education, 59 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, David, “France Seeking More Female Scientists with Offer of $4,500 Scholarships,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 September, 1985.Google Scholar
Dyhouse, Carol, No Distinction of Sex? Women in British Universities 1870–1939 (London: UCL Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Farago, Peter, “Interview with Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin,” Journal of Chemical Education, 54 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehrs, Mary and Czujko, Roman, “Women in Physics: Reversing the Exclusion,” Physics Today, 45 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlen, Paula, “Science as a Career in Enlightenment Italy, The Strategies of Laura Bassi,” Isis, 84 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlen, Paula, “Translating the New Science: Women and the Circulation of Knowledge in Enlightenment Italy,” Configurations, 2 (1995).Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard, Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds, introduction by Gelbart, Nina (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Freeman, Joan, A Passion for Physics: The Story of a Woman Physicist (Bristol, England: Adam Hilger, 1991).Google Scholar
Freeman, Joan, A Passion for Physics; Edward Hill, My Daughter Beatrice: A Personal Memoir of Dr. Beatrice Tinsley, Astronomer (New York: American Physical Society, 1986).Google Scholar
Gleiser, Molly, “The Garvan Women,” Journal of Chemical Education, 62 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Paula, “Women and the Culture of University Physics in Late Nineteenth-Century Cambridge,” British Journal for the History of Science, 30 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habashi, Fathi, “Ida Noddack (1896–1978),” C[anadian] I[nstitute] of M[etals] Bulletin 78, no. 877 (May 1985).Google Scholar
Hall, Alfred E., “Baccalaureate Origins of Doctorate Recipients in Chemistry: 1920–1980,” Journal of Chemical Education, 62 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gerald, “Of Love, Physics and Other Passions: The Letters of Albert [Einstein] and Mileva [Marić],” Physics Today, 47 (August 1994), and (September 1994).Google Scholar
Hoobler, Icie Gertrude Macy, Boundless Horizons: Portrait of a Pioneer Woman Scientist (Smithtown, N.Y.: Exposition Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Hudson, Gill, “Unfathering the Thinkable: Gender, Science and Pacificism in the 1930s,” in Science and Sensibility: Gender and Scientific Enquiry, 1780–1945, ed. Benjamin, Marina (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Johnson, Karen E., “Maria Goeppert Mayer: Atoms, Molecules and Nuclear Shells,” Physics Today, 39, no. 9 (September 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julian, Maureen M., “Dame Kathleen Lonsdale,” Physics Teacher, 19 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koblitz, Ann Hibner, A Convergence of Lives: Sofia Kovalevskaia: Scientist, Writer, Revolutionary (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1993; rev. ed.).Google Scholar
Koblitz, Ann Hibner, “Science, Women, and the Russian Intelligentsia: The Generation of the 1860s,” Isis, 79 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Robert E., “Innovation in Normal Science: Bacterial Physiology,” Isis, 76 (1985).Google ScholarPubMed
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory, “Maria Mitchell and the Advancement of Women in Science,” in Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789–1979, ed. Abir-Am, Pnina G. and Outram, Dorinda (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Kubanek, Anne-Marie Weidler, “Ellen Gleditsch (1879–1968), Nuclear Chemist,” in Notable Women in the Physical Sciences, ed. Shearer, Benjamin F. and Shearer, Barbara S. (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Lankford, John, American Astronomy, Community, Careers, and Power, 1859–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Leitner, Gerit, Der Fall Clara Immerwahr: Leben für eine humane Wissenschaf (Munich: Beck, 1993).Google Scholar
Lindee, Susan, “The American Career of Jane Marcet’s Conversations on Chemistry, 1806–1853,” Isis, 82 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy and Moseley, Russell, “Fathers and Daughters: Reflections of Women, Science, and Victorian Cambridge,” History of Education, 8 (1979).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magallon, Carmen, “Mujeres en Las Ciencias Fisico-Quimicas en Espana: El Instituto Nacional de Ciencias y el Instituto Nacional de Fisicay Quimica (1910–1936),” Llull, 20 (1997).Google Scholar
Margadant, Jo Burr, Madame le Professeur: Women Educators in the Third Republic (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Masevich, A. G. and Terentieva, A. K., “Zhenshchiny-astronomy” Istoriko-Astronomischeskie Issledovaniia, 23 (1991).Google Scholar
Mason, Joan, “The Admission of the First Women to the Royal Society of London,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 46 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Joan, “A Forty Years’ War,” Chemistry in Britain, 27 (1991).Google Scholar
Maushart, Marie-Ann, “Um mich nicht zu vergessen:” Hertha Sponer – Ein Frauenleben für die Physik im 20. Jahrhundert (Bassum: Verlagfür Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften undder Technik, 1997).Google Scholar
McGrayne, Sharon Bertsch, Nobel Prize Women in Science: Their Lives, Struggles, and Momentous Discoveries (Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Publishing, 1993).Google Scholar
Megaw, W. John, “Gender Distribution in the World’s Physics Departments,” in Council, National Research, Women in Science and Engineering: Increasing Their Numbers in the 1990s (Washington, D.C., 1991).Google Scholar
Menard, Albert and Uzun, Ali, “Educating Women for Success in Physics: Lessons from Turkey,” American Journal of Physics, 61, no. 7 (July 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jane A., “Erika Cremer (1900–),” in Women in Chemistry and Physics: A Biobibliographic Sourcebook, ed. Grinstein, Louise S., Rose, Rose K., and Rafailovich, Miriam H. (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Moyal, Ann, “Invisible Participants: Women Scientists in Australia, 1830–1950,” Prometheus, 11, no. 2 (December 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nappi, Chiara, “On Mathematics and Science Education in the U.S. and Europe,” Physics Today, 43, no. 5 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noether, and Richards, Joan L., “Hilda Geiringer,” in Notable American Women: The Modern Period, A Biographical Dictionary, ed. Sicherman, Barbara and Hurd, Carol Green (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Oesper, Ralph E., “Gertrud Woker,” Journal of Chemical Education, 30 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Marilyn and Harvey, Joy, eds., The Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science, Pioneering Lives from Ancient Times to the mid-20th century, 2 vols. (New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Marilyn Bailey, Women in Science: Antiquity Through the Nineteenth Century: A Biographical Dictionary with Annotated Bibliography (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986; 1990).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Marilyn Bailey, “Caroline Herschel’s Contributions to Astronomy,” Annals of Science, 32 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Elizabeth C., Mary Somerville and the Cultivation of Science, 1815–1840 (The Hague: Nijhoff 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perl, Teri, “The Ladies’ Diary or Woman’s Almanack, 1704–1841,” Historia Mathematica, 6 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pycior, Helena M., “Reaping the Benefits of Collaboration While Avoiding Its Pitfalls: Marie Curie’s Rise to Scientific Prominence,” Social Studies of Science, 23 (1993).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pycior, Helena M., “Pierre Curie and ‘His Eminent Collaborator Mme. Curie,’” in Creative Couples in the Sciences, ed. Pycior, Helena, Slack, Nancy, and Abir-Am, Pnina (New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Quinn, Susan, Marie Curie (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994), reviewed by Badash, Lawrence in Isis in 1997.Google Scholar
Rayner-Canham, Marelene F. and Rayner-Canham, Geoffrey W., Harriet Brooks: Pioneer Nuclear Scientist (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Rayner-Canham, Marelene F. and Rayer-Canham, Geoffrey W., sr. authors and eds., A Devotion to Their Science: Pioneer Women of Radioactivity (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation; and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Renn, J. and Schulman, R. ed. Albert Einstein/Mileva Marić: The Love Letters, (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Ritter, Jim, “French Academy Elects First Woman to Full Membership,” Nature, 282 (January 1980).Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science,” Social Studies of Science, 23 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “‘But She’s an Avowed Communist!’ L’Affaire Curie at the American Chemical Society, 1953–55,” Bulletin for the History of Chemistry, no. 20 (1997).Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “Mendel the Mentor: Yale Women Doctorates in Biochemistry, 1898–1937,” Journal of Chemical Education, 71 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “Which Science? Which Women?” Osiris, 12 (1998).Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “Women’s Work in Science, 1880–1910,” Isis, 71 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret, “Chemical Librarianship: A Kind of‘Women’s Work in America,” Ambix, 43 (March 1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossiter, Margaret W., Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940 [Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982], p..)Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret W., Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940–1972 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Ruth, and Wallis, Peter, “Female Philomaths,” Historia Mathematica, 7 (1980).Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T., “A Science Turned Upside Down: Feminism and the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 47 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, Anne, Rosalind Franklin & DNA (New York: W. W. Norton, 1975).Google Scholar
Scheich, Elvira, “Science, Politics, and Morality: The Relationship of Lise Meitner and Elisabeth Schiemann,” Osiris, 12 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa, “Maria Winkelman at the Berlin Academy, A Turning Point for Women in Science,” Isis, 78 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shmurak, Carol, “Emma Perry Carr: The Spectrum of a Life,” Ambix, 41 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shmurak, Carol, “‘Castle of Science’: Mount Holyoke College and the Preparation of Women in Chemistry, 1837ü1941,” History of Education Quarterly 32 (1992).Google Scholar
Sime, Ruth, Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Stage, Sarah and Vincenti, Virginia, eds., Rethinking Women and Home Economics in the Twentieth Century (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Steinberg, Charlene, “Yulya Vsevolodovna Lermontova (1846–1919),” Journal of Chemical Education, 60 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrall, Mary, “Emilie du Chatelet and the Gendering of Science,” History of Science, 33 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Kim “Science for Ladies, Classics for Gentlemen: A Comparative Analysis of Scientific Subjects in the Curricula of Boys’ and Girls’ Secondary Schools in the United States, 1794–1850,” History of Education Quarterly, 36 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traweek, Sharon, Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Tscherisch, H., Malz, E., and Gaede, K., “Sag mir, wo die Frauen sind!” Urania, 28, no. 3 (March 1965).Google Scholar
Turkevich, John, Soviet Men [sic] of Science, Academicians and Corresponding Members of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand, 1963).Google Scholar
Vitug, Marites D., “The Philippines: Fighting the Patriarchy in Growing Numbers,” Science, 263 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisgal, Meyer W., “Prof. Anna Weizmann,” Nature, 198 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woronzoff-Dashkoff, A. “Princess E. R. Dashkova: First Woman Member of the American Philosophical Society,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 140 (1996).Google Scholar
Yagi, Eri, Matsuda, Hisako, and Narita, Kyomi, “Toshiko Yuasa (1909–1980), and the Nature of her Archives at Ochan-omizu University in Tokyo,” Historia Scientarum, 7 (1997).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×