Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:22:40.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Military captivity in two world wars

legal frameworks and camp regimes

from Part II - The Era of Total War, 1914–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Roger Chickering
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Dennis Showalter
Affiliation:
Colorado College
Hans van de Ven
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Military captivity was one of the most pervasive experiences in both world wars. In World War I an estimated 8 million soldiers became prisoners of war (POWs), while in World War II the number was perhaps as high as 35 million. If one adds the number of soldiers captured in the multitude of wars that occurred between the signing of the Hague Convention of 1899 (the first major international treaty relating to the treatment of POWs) and the signing of the Geneva Convention in 1949, the number of captured soldiers approximated 50 million.

The difficulty of assessing the number of POWs during this period stems not only from the general unreliability of wartime statistics during the first half of the twentieth century, but also from the deliberate obfuscation by some armies of their casualty figures. Moreover, because the designation “prisoner of war” came to be applied only to interstate warfare (rather than intrastate or non-state warfare), many de facto combatants did not acquire this legal designation at all (or lost it for various reasons). In other words, the evolving legal codification of POW treatment in the period 1899–1949 affected not only the treatment of military captives, but also the framing of captivity itself.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ferguson, Niall, The Pity of War: Explaining World War One (New York, 1999), 368–69Google Scholar
Krivosheev, G. F., Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century (London, 1997), 231Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, “Constraints on Warfare,” in Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George, and Shulman, Mark, eds., The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World (New Haven, 1994), 1–11Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey, War and Law since 1945 (Oxford, 1994), 14.Google Scholar
Streeruwitz, Ernst, “Die Stockholmer Konferenz 1915,” in Weiland, Hans and Kern, Leopold, eds., In Feindeshand: Die Gefangenschaft im Weltkriege in Einzeldarstellungen (2 vols., Vienna, 1931), vol. II, 331–35Google Scholar
von Raabl-Werner, Heinrich, “Österreich-Ungarns offizielle Kriegsgefangenen Fürsorge,” in Weiland and Kern, eds., Feindeshand, vol. 2, 324–31
Nachtigal, Reinhard, Russland und seine österreichisch-ungarischen Kriegsgefangenen, 1914–1918 (Remshalden, 2003)Google Scholar
Yanikdağ, Yücel, “Ottoman Prisoners of War in Russia 1914–1922,” Journal of Contemporary History 34 (1999): 69–85Google Scholar
Beaumont, , “Protecting Prisoners,” 279; Bischof, Günter and Ambrose, Stephen, eds., Eisenhower and the German POWs: Facts against Falsehood (Baton Rouge, LA, 1992)Google Scholar
Barber, John and Harrison, Mark, The Soviet Home Front: A Social and Economic History of the USSR in World War II (London and New York, 1991), 40Google Scholar
Moritz, Verena, Zwischen Nutzen und Bedrohung: Die russischen Kriegsgefangenen in Österreich 1914–1921 (Bonn, 2005), 180Google Scholar
Nachtigal, Reinhard, Die Murmanbahn: Die Verkehrsanbindung eines kriegswichtigen Hafens und das Arbeitspotential der Kriegsgefangenen (1915 bis 1918) (Grunbach, 2001), 16Google Scholar
Kochavi, Arieh J., Confronting Captivity: Britain and the United States and Their POWs in Nazi Germany (Chapel Hill, 2005), 40–52Google Scholar
Vourkoutiotis, , Prisoners of War and the German High Command: The British and American Experience (New York, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×