Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Maps
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction to volume IV
- Part I The industrialization of warfare, 1850–1914
- Part II The Era of Total War, 1914–1945
- 8 World War I
- 9 Military captivity in two world wars
- 10 Military occupations, 1914–1945
- 11 Home fronts
- 12 The search for peace in the interwar period
- 13 Commemorating war, 1914–1945
- 14 Military doctrine and planning in the interwar era
- 15 The military and the revolutionary state
- 16 World War II
- Part III Post-total warfare, 1945–2005
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
9 - Military captivity in two world wars
legal frameworks and camp regimes
from Part II - The Era of Total War, 1914–1945
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Maps
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction to volume IV
- Part I The industrialization of warfare, 1850–1914
- Part II The Era of Total War, 1914–1945
- 8 World War I
- 9 Military captivity in two world wars
- 10 Military occupations, 1914–1945
- 11 Home fronts
- 12 The search for peace in the interwar period
- 13 Commemorating war, 1914–1945
- 14 Military doctrine and planning in the interwar era
- 15 The military and the revolutionary state
- 16 World War II
- Part III Post-total warfare, 1945–2005
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Military captivity was one of the most pervasive experiences in both world wars. In World War I an estimated 8 million soldiers became prisoners of war (POWs), while in World War II the number was perhaps as high as 35 million. If one adds the number of soldiers captured in the multitude of wars that occurred between the signing of the Hague Convention of 1899 (the first major international treaty relating to the treatment of POWs) and the signing of the Geneva Convention in 1949, the number of captured soldiers approximated 50 million.
The difficulty of assessing the number of POWs during this period stems not only from the general unreliability of wartime statistics during the first half of the twentieth century, but also from the deliberate obfuscation by some armies of their casualty figures. Moreover, because the designation “prisoner of war” came to be applied only to interstate warfare (rather than intrastate or non-state warfare), many de facto combatants did not acquire this legal designation at all (or lost it for various reasons). In other words, the evolving legal codification of POW treatment in the period 1899–1949 affected not only the treatment of military captives, but also the framing of captivity itself.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of War , pp. 214 - 235Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
- 1
- Cited by