Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T22:08:41.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

101. - Intuition

from I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

In each of the taxonomies of cognition found throughout Spinoza’s corpus, there is a kind of cognition that is (1) inerrant (TIE[29], KV2.1) or necessarily true (E2p41), (2) a cognition of an essence (TIE[29], E2p40s2) or of the “thing itself” (KV2.2), and (3) a cognition that is intuitive in the sense that it does not require that one work through any demonstrations or practice any “art of reasoning” (KV1.1, TIE[24], E2p40s2).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1973). Experience in Spinoza’s theory of knowledge. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 2559). Anchor.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2010). Spinoza’s theory of scientia intuitiva. In Sorrell, T., Rogers, G. A. J., and Kraye, J. (eds.), Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 99116). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2024). Finding oneself in God: Scientia intuitiva as a metaphysically self-locating thought. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2016). The distinction between reason and intuitive knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. European Journal of Philosophy, 24, 2754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1983). Infinite understanding, scientia intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, Y. (1989). The third kind of knowledge as alternative salvation. In Spinoza and Other Heretics, vol. i: The Marrano of Reason (pp. 153–71). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×