Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVolume IV
- The Cambridge World History
- A World with States, Empires, and Networks, 1200 bce–900 ce
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: the world from 1200 bce to 900 ce
- Part I Global histories
- 2 Global economic history
- 3 The gendering of power in the family and the state
- 4 Slavery
- 5 The Axial Age in world history
- 6 Developments in science and technology c. 800 bce – c. 800 ce
- 7 Discourses on gender and sexuality
- 8 Art
- 9 Pastoral nomads
- Part II Trans-regional and regional perspectives
- Index
- References
6 - Developments in science and technology c. 800 bce – c. 800 ce
from Part I - Global histories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVolume IV
- The Cambridge World History
- A World with States, Empires, and Networks, 1200 bce–900 ce
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: the world from 1200 bce to 900 ce
- Part I Global histories
- 2 Global economic history
- 3 The gendering of power in the family and the state
- 4 Slavery
- 5 The Axial Age in world history
- 6 Developments in science and technology c. 800 bce – c. 800 ce
- 7 Discourses on gender and sexuality
- 8 Art
- 9 Pastoral nomads
- Part II Trans-regional and regional perspectives
- Index
- References
Summary
The Neolithic Revolution set in motion a development whereby humans influenced their environment on an ever larger scale in order to meet their need for nutrition and material goods. A process of eminent historical importance, especially to the history of the knowledge about nature and technology, was the cultural, political, and economic development of Greece during the Archaic Period. A new era of natural science in ancient Greece began in Alexandria. The development of technology in antiquity was shaped in equal measure by inventions and innovations, by technology transfer and the adoption of technical artefacts and processes from foreign cultures, by the preservation of traditional technology, and also by stagnation. The technological achievements of China included inventions in the field of mechanics, especially the use of water power. The development in India was similar to that in China: the emergence and collapse of empires, immigration, urbanization, internal wars, and local powers shaped Indian civilization in crucial ways.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History , pp. 120 - 153Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Further Reading
Balasubramanian, A. V., “Metallurgy in India,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 728–30.Google Scholar
Boardman, John, The Greek Sculpture: The Archaic Period, London: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Bray, Francesca, “Agriculture in China,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter, Weisheit und Wissenschaft: Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon, Nuremberg: Hans Carl, 1962.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander (ed.), Stätten des Geistes: Große Universitäten Europas von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Cologne: Böhlau, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walther (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker Griechisch und Deutsch, Hildesheim: Weidmann, 1951.Google Scholar
Domergue, Claude, Les mines antiques: La production des métaux aux époques grecque et romaine, Paris: A&J Picard, 2008.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Ludwig, Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein, Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Embree, Ainslie Thomas, and Wilhelm, Friedrich, Indien: Geschichte des Subkontinents von der Induskultur bis zum Beginn der englischen Herrschaft, Frankfurt am Main
: Fischer-Bücherei, 1967.Google Scholar
Flashar, Hellmut, “Athen: Die institutionelle Begründung von Forschung und Lehre,” in Demandt, Alexander (ed.), Stätten des Geistes: Große Universitäten Europas von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Cologne: Böhlau, 1999, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Franz, Heinrich G. (ed.), Das Alte Indien: Geschichte und Kultur des indischen Subkontinents, Munich: Bertelsmann, 1990.Google Scholar
Furley, David, Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature, Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Gille, Bertrand, Les mécaniciens grecs: La naissance de la technologie, Paris: Seuil, 1980.Google Scholar
Goepper, Roger (ed.), Das Alte China: Geschichte und Kultur des Reiches der Mitte, Munich: C. Bertelsmann, 1988.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan, and Lennox, James G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, William Keith Chambers, A History of Greek Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1962–81, vols. i–vi.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Takao, “Number Theory in India,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 784–86.Google Scholar
Healy, John F., Mining and Metallurgy in the Greek and Roman World, London: Thames and Hudson, 1978.Google Scholar
Healy, John F., Pliny the Elder on Science and Technology, Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Yoke, Ho Peng, “Astronomy in China,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 108–11.Google Scholar
Jueming, Hua, “Metallurgy in China,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 725–26.Google Scholar
Humphrey, John W., Oleson, John P., and Sherwood, Andrew N. (eds.), Greek and Roman Technology: A Sourcebook: Annotated translations of Greek and Latin texts and documents, New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Joseph, G. G., “Mathematics in India,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 634–37.Google Scholar
Judson, Lindsay (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, Oxford University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M., The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelbing, Huldyrch M., Arzt und Patient in der antiken Welt, Zürich: Artemis Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Dorothea, “Wissenschaften und Technik,” in Goepper, Roger (ed.), Das Alte China: Geschichte und Kultur des Reiches der Mitte, Munich: C. Bertelsmann, 1988, pp. 247–79.Google Scholar
Kulke, Hermann, and Rothermund, Dietmar, Geschichte Indiens: Von der Induskultur bis heute, Munich: Beck, 2006.Google Scholar
Yong, Lam Lay, “Pi in Chinese Mathematics,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 822–23.Google Scholar
Landels, John G., Engineering in the Ancient World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Libbrecht, Ulrich, “Mathematics in China,” in Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997, pp. 626–29.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought, Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle, London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1970.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Greek Science after Aristotle, London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1973.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science, Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Methods and Problems in Greek Science: Selected Papers, Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece, Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Longrigg, James, Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians, London: Routledge, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolet, Claude (ed.), Les littératures techniques dans l’antiquité romaine: Statut, public et destination, tradition, Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1996.Google Scholar
Oleson, John Peter (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World, Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Price, Jennifer, “Glass,” in Strong, Donald and Brown, David (eds.), Roman Crafts, New York University Press, 1976, pp. 111–25.Google Scholar
Sadao, Nishijima, “The Economic and Social History of the Former Han,” in Twitchett, Denis and Loewe, Michael (eds.), The Cambridge History of China, Cambridge University Press, 1986, vol. i, pp. 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambursky, Samuel, Das Physikalische Weltbild der Antike, Zürich: Akademie-Verl, 1965.Google Scholar
Schneider, Helmuth, Das griechische Technikverständnis: Von den Epen Homers bis zu den Anfängen der technologischen Fachliteratur, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1989.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, Bernd, “Alexandria: Die Bibliothek der Könige und die Wissenschaften,” in Demandt, Alexander (ed.), Stätten des Geistes: Große Universitäten Europas von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Cologne: Böhlau, 1999, pp. 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selin, Helaine (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, London: Springer, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaje, Walter, “Die brahmanisch-orthodoxe Scholastik,” in Franz, Heinrich G. (ed.), Das Alte Indien: Geschichte und Kultur des indischen Subkontinents, Munich: C. Bertelsmann, 1990, pp. 264–75.Google Scholar
Spengler, Tilman, and Needham, Joseph, Wissenschaftlicher Universalismus: Über Bedeutung und Besonderheit der chinesischen Wissenschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar
Strong, Donald, and Brown, David (eds.), Roman Crafts, New York University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ivor (ed.), Greek Mathematical Works, Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1980, vols. i–ii.Google Scholar
Twitchett, Denis, and Loewe, Michael (eds.), The Cambridge History of China, Cambridge University Press, 1986, vol. i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, Sarah, Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics: A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikander, Örjan (ed.), Handbook of Ancient Water Technology, Leiden: Brill, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Michael, Geschichte der Impetustheorie: Untersuchungen zum Ursprung der klassischen Mechanik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978.Google Scholar