References

Vladimir Kanovei; Marcin Sabok; Jindřich Zapletal

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139208666.012

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2013

Vladimir Kanovei ,

Marcin Sabok and

Jindřich Zapletal

Show author details

Vladimir Kanovei: Affiliation:
Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Marcin Sabok: Affiliation:
Polish Academy of Sciences
Jindřich Zapletal: Affiliation:
University of Florida

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Canonical Ramsey Theory on Polish Spaces , pp. 264 - 267

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208666.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagaria, J. and DiPrisco, C.A. (2009) Parameterized partition relations on the real numbers, Archive for Mathematical Logic 48, 201–226.Google Scholar

Balcar, B. and Simon, P. (1989) Disjoint refinement. In Handbook of Boolean Algebras. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 333–388.

Balcar, B., Jech, T. and Pazák, T. (2005) Complete CCC Boolean algebras, the order sequential topology, and a problem of von Neumann, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 37, 885–898.Google Scholar

Bartoszynski, T. and Judah, H. (1995) Set Theory: On the Structure ofthe Real Line. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters.

Becker, H. and Kechris, A. (1996) The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions. London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bell, J.L. (2005) Set Theory. Oxford Logic Guides 47. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Blass, A. (1989) Applications of superperfect forcing and its relatives. In Set Theory and its Applications, Toronto 1987. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1401. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 18–40.CrossRef

Brendle, J., Hjorth, G. and Spinas, O. (1995) Regularity properties for dominating projective sets, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 72, 291–307.Google Scholar

Cichon, J., Morayne, M., Pawlikowski, J. and Solecki, S. (1991) Decomposing Baire functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 56, 1273–1283.Google Scholar

Clemens, J. and Zapletal, J. (2012) Dichotomies for ideals, in preparation.

Connes, A., Feldman, J. and Weiss, B. (1981) An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 1, 431–450.Google Scholar

Debs, G. (1995) Polar σ-ideals of compact sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 347, 317–338.Google Scholar

Debs, G. and Saint-Raymond, J. (1987) Ensembles boréliens d'unicité et d'unicité au sens large, Annals de l'Institut Fourier (Grenoble) 37, 217–239.Google Scholar

Doucha, M. (2013) Ph.D. thesis, Charles University.

Erdős, P. and Rado, R. (1950) A combinatorial theorem, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 25, 249–255.Google Scholar

Farah, I. and Zapletal, J. (2004) Between Maharam's and von Neumann's problems, Mathematical Research Letters 11, 673–684.Google Scholar

Feldman, J. and Moore, C. C. (1977) Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology and von Neumann algebras, Transactions ofthe American Mathematical Society 234, 289–324.Google Scholar

Foreman, M. and Magidor, M. (1995) Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76, 47–97.Google Scholar

Galvin, F. and Prikry, K. (1973) Borel sets and Ramsey's theorem, Journal of Symbolic Logic 38, 193–198.Google Scholar

Gao, S. (2009) Invariant Descriptive Set Theory. Boca Raton, CA: CRC Press.

Grigorieff, S. (1971) Combinatorics on ideals and forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic 3, 363–394.Google Scholar

Groszek, M. (1987) Combinatorics of ideals and forcing with trees, Journal of Symbolic Logic 52, 582–593.Google Scholar

Groszek, M. (1994) as an initial segment of the c degrees, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 956–976.Google Scholar

Harrington, L., Kechris, A. S. and Louveau, A. (1990) A Glimm-Effros dichotomy for Borel equivalence relations, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 3, 903–928.Google Scholar

Harrington, L., Marker, D. and Shelah, S. (1988) Borel orderings, Transactions ofthe American Mathematical Society 310, 293–302.Google Scholar

Hjorth, G. (2000) Actions by the classical Banach spaces, Journal of Symbolic Logic 65, 392–420.Google Scholar

Humke, P. D. and Preiss, D. (1985) Measures for which σ -porous sets are null, Journal ofthe London Mathematical Society 32, 236–244.Google Scholar

Ishiu, T. (2005) α-properness and Axiom A, Fundamenta Mathematicae 186, 25–37.Google Scholar

Jech, T. (2002) Set Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.

Jech, T. and Balcar, B. (2006) Weak distributivity, a problem of von Neumann, and the mystery of measurability, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12, 241–265.Google Scholar

Jossen, S. and Spinas, O. (2005) A two-dimensional tree ideal. In Logic Colloquium 2000. Lecture Notes in Logic 19. Urbana, IL: Association for Symbolic Logic, pp. 294–322.

Judah, H., Roslanowski, A. and Shelah, S. (1994) Examples for souslin forcing, Fundamenta Mathematicae 144, 23–42. Math.LO/9310224.Google Scholar

Kanamori, A. (1994) The Higher Infinite. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Kanovei, V. (1999) On non-well-founded iterations of the perfect set forcing, Journal of Symbolic Logic 64, 191–207.Google Scholar

Kanovei, V. (2008) Borel Equivalence Relations. University Lecture Series 44. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Kanovei, V. and Reeken, M. (2000) New Radon-Nikodym ideals, Mathematika 47, 219–227.Google Scholar

Kechris, A. and Louveau, A. (1989) Descriptive Set Theory and the Structure of Sets of Uniqueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kechris, A. and Louveau, A. (1997) The structure of hypersmooth Borel equivalence relations, Journal of American Mathematical Society 10, 215–242.Google Scholar

Kechris, A. and Miller, B. (2004) Topics in Orbit Equivalence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1852. New York: Springer Verlag.

Kechris, A., Louveau, A. and Woodin, H. (1987) The structure of σ-ideals of compact sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 301, 263–288.Google Scholar

Kechris, A. S. (1977) On a notion of smallness for subsets of the Baire space, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 229, 191–207.Google Scholar

Kechris, A. S. (1994) Classical Descriptive Set Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.

Kellner, J. and Shelah, S. (2011) Saccharinity, Journal of Symbolic Logic 74, 1153–1183. Math.LO/0511330.Google Scholar

Klein, O. and Spinas, O. (2005) Canonical forms of Borel functions on the Milliken space, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 357, 4739–4769.Google Scholar

Lindenstrauss, J., Preiss, D. and Tišer, J. (2012) Fréchet Differentiability of Lipschitz Functions and Porous Sets in Banach Spaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies 179. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Martin, D. A. (1985) A purely inductive proof of Borel determinacy. In A., Nerode and R. A., Shore (eds), Recursion Theory. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 42. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 303–308.

Matet, P. (1988) Some filters of partitions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 53, 540–553.Google Scholar

Mathias, A. R. (1977) Happy families, Annals of Mathematical Logic 12, 59–111.Google Scholar

Mazur, K. (1991) Fσ -ideals and ω1ω1* gaps in the Boolean algebra P(ω)/I, Fundamenta Mathematicae 138, 103–111.Google Scholar

Miller, A.W. (1984) Rational perfect set forcing. In Axiomatic Set Theory. Contemporary Mathematics 31. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 143–159.CrossRef

Mycielski, J. (1964) Independent sets in topological algebras, Fundamenta Mathematicae 55, 139–147.Google Scholar

Nešetril, J. (2005) Ramsey classes and homogeneous structures, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 14, 171–189.Google Scholar

Pelant, J. and Zeleny, M. (2004) The structure of the σ-ideal of σ-porous sets, Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 45, 37–72.Google Scholar

Pestov, V. (2006) Dynamics of Infinite-Dimensional Groups. University Lecture Series 40. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Pol, R. and Zakrzewski, P. (2012) On Borel mappings and σ-ideals generated by closed sets, Advances in Mathematics 231, 651–663.Google Scholar

Prömel, H.J. and Voigt, B. (1985) Canonical forms of Borel-measurable mappings Δ :[ω]ω → R, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 40, 409–417.Google Scholar

Rajchman, A. (1922) Sur l'unicité du développement trigonométrique, Fundamenta Mathematicae 3, 287–302.Google Scholar

Rojas, D. (2006) Using determinacy to inscribe compact non-σ-porous sets into projective non-σ-porous sets, Real Analysis Exchange 32, 55–66.Google Scholar

Rosendal, C. (2005) Cofinal families of Borel equivalence relations and quasiorders, Journal of Symbolic Logic 70, 1325–1340.Google Scholar

Rosłanowski, A. (2006) n-localization property, Journal of Symbolic Logic 71, 881–902.Google Scholar

Sabok, M. (2009) σ-continuity and related forcings, Archive for Mathematical Logic 48, 449–464.Google Scholar

Sabok, M. (2012a) Forcing, games, and families of closed sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 364, 4011–4039.Google Scholar

Sabok, M. (2012b) Complexity of Ramsey null sets, Advances in Mathematics 230, 1184–1195.Google Scholar

Sabok, M. and Zapletal, J. (2011) Forcing properties of ideals of closed sets, Journal of Symbolic Logic 76, 1075–1095.Google Scholar

Shelah, S. (1998) Proper and Improper Forcing. 2nd edn. New York: Springer Verlag.

Shelah, S. and Zapletal, J. (2011) Ramsey theorems for product of finite sets with submeasures, Combinatorica 31, 225–244.Google Scholar

Silver, J. (1970) Every analytic set is Ramsey, Journal of Symbolic Logic 35, 60–64.Google Scholar

Silver, J. (1980) Counting the number of equivalence classes of Borel and coanalytic equivalence relations, Annals of Mathematical Logic 18, 1–28.Google Scholar

Solecki, S. (1994) Covering analytic sets by families of closed sets, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 1022–1031.Google Scholar

Solecki, S. (1999) Analytic ideals and their applications, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 99, 51–72.Google Scholar

Solecki, S. and Spinas, O. (1999) Dominating and unbounded free sets, Journal of Symbolic Logic 64, 75–80.Google Scholar

Spinas, O. (2001a) Canonical behavior of Borel functions on superperfect rectangles, Journal of Mathematical Logic 1, 173–220.Google Scholar

Spinas, O. (2001b) Ramsey and freeness properties of Polish planes, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 82, 31–63.Google Scholar

Spinas, O. (2009) Proper products, Proceedings ofthe American Mathematical Society 137, 2767–2772.Google Scholar

Steprans, J. (1993) A very discontinuous Borel function, Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 1268–1283.Google Scholar

Stern, J. (1984) On Lusin's restricted continuum problem, Annals of Mathematics 120, 7–37.Google Scholar

Taylor, A.D. (1976) A canonical partition relation for finite subsets of ω, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 21, 137–146.Google Scholar

Todorcevic, S. (2010) Introduction to Ramsey Spaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies 174. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Velickovic, B. and Woodin, W. H. (1998) Complexity of the reals in inner models of set theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92, 283–295.Google Scholar

Zajícek, L. (1987/1988) Porosity and σ-porosity, Real Analysis Exchange 13, 314–350.Google Scholar

Zajícek, L. and Zeleny, M. (2005) Inscribing compact non-σ-porous sets into analytic non-σ-porous sets, Fundamenta Mathematicae 185, 19–39.Google Scholar

Zapletal, J. (2003) Isolating cardinal invariants, Journal of Mathematical Logic 3, 143–162.Google Scholar

Zapletal, J. (2004) Descriptive Set Theory and Definable Forcing. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Zapletal, J. (2008) Forcing Idealized. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zapletal, J. (2009) Preservation of P-points and definable forcing, Fundamenta Mathematicae 204, 145–154.Google Scholar

Zapletal, J. (2011) Overspill and forcing, preprint.

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive