Book contents
- Child Custody in Islamic Law
- Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization
- Child Custody in Islamic Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Child Custody and Guardianship in Comparative Perspective
- Part II Ottoman-Egyptian Practice, 1517–1801
- Part III The Transition into Modernity
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Other titles in the series
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2018
Book contents
- Child Custody in Islamic Law
- Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization
- Child Custody in Islamic Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Child Custody and Guardianship in Comparative Perspective
- Part II Ottoman-Egyptian Practice, 1517–1801
- Part III The Transition into Modernity
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Other titles in the series
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Child Custody in Islamic LawTheory and Practice in Egypt since the Sixteenth Century, pp. 239 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abramowicz, Sarah. “English Child Custody Law, 1660–1839: The Origins of Judicial Intervention in Paternal Custody.” Columbia Law Review 99:5 (1999): 1344–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abū al-Faḍāʾil, Ibn al-ʿAssāl al-Ṣafī. Al-Majmūʿ Al-Ṣafawī. Edited by Fīlūthaws ʿAwaḍ, Girgis. 2 vols. Cairo, n.d.Google Scholar
Agmon, Iris. Family & Court: Legal Culture and Modernity in Late Ottoman Palestine. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Agrama, Hussein Ali. Questioning Secularism: Islam, Sovereignty, and the Rule of Law in Modern Egypt. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aḥmad, Fāṭima al-Zahrāʾ ʿAbbās, and Ḥasan, Ḥilmī ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm. Qānūn Al-Aḥwāl Al-Shakhṣiyya Li’l-Muslimīn Wa’l-Qarārāt Al-Munaffidha Li-Aḥkāmih Wa-Baʿḍ Aḥkām Al-Maḥkama Al-Dustūriyya Al-ʿUlyā Al-Ṣādira Bi-Shaʾnih. Cairo: al-Maṭābiʿal-Amīriyya, 2009.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Shahab. What Is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkach, Samer. ʿAbd Al-Ghani Al-Nabulusi: Islam and the Enlightenment. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2014.Google Scholar
Al-Ḥaṭṭāb al-Ruʿaynī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad al-Maghribī. Mawāhib Al-Jalīl Li-Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar Khalīl. Edited by ʿUmayrāt, Zakariyyā. 8 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1995.Google Scholar
Ali, Kecia. Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip. “The Best Interests Principle: Towards a Reconciliation of Culture and Human Rights.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 8:1 (1994): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Philip, and UNICEF, and International Child Development Centre. The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights. Oxford; New York, NY: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Anjum, Ovamir. Politics, Law and Community in Islamic Thought: The Taymiyyan Moment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
An-Na’im, Abdullahi. “Cultural Transformation and Normative Consensus on the Best Interests of the Child.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 8:1 (1994): 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ʿArnūs, Maḥmūd. “Baʿḍ Masāʾil Al-Ḥaḍāna.” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 2:1 (1930): 5–11.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University, 1986.Google Scholar
Astarūshinī, Muḥammad b. Maḥmūd b. al-Ḥusayn. Aḥkām Al-Ṣighār. Edited by Ṣumayda, Muṣṭafā. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
Asyūṭī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Aḥmad al-Minhājī al-. Jawāhir Al-ʿUqūd Wa-Muʿīn Al-Quḍāh Wa’l-Muwaqqiʿīna Wa’l-Shuhūd. Edited by Saʿdanī, Musʿad ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Muḥammad. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1996.Google Scholar
Atçıl, Abdurrahman. Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badran, Margot. Feminists, Islam, and Nation: Gender and the Making of Modern Egypt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James. “Islamic Law in an Ottoman Context: Resolving Disputes in Late 17th/Early 18th-Century Cairo.” PhD Dissertation, New York University, 2010.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James E. Islamic Law and Empire in Ottoman Cairo. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkhī, Niẓām al-Dīn. Al-Fatāwā Al-Hindiyya. 2nd edn. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaʿa al-Kubrā al-Amīriyya, 1893.Google Scholar
Baron, Beth. “Islam, Philanthropy, and Political Culture in Interwar Egypt: The Activism of Labiba Ahmad.” In Poverty and Charity in Middle Eastern Contexts. Edited by Bonner, Michael David, Ener, Mine, and Singer, Amy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2003, 239–254.Google Scholar
Baron, Beth. “Orphans and Abandoned Children in Modern Egypt.” In Interpreting Welfare and Relief in the Middle East. Leiden: Brill, 2008, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Beth The Women’s Awakening in Egypt: Culture, Society, and the Press. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bashīr, Marwā al-. “Majmaʿ Al-Buḥūth Yaḥsim Al-Jadal: Qanūn Al-Ḥaḍāna Muṭābiq Li’l-Sharīʿa.” Al-Ahram Newspaper. May 25, 2012. www.masress.com/ahram/151360.Google Scholar
Bayhaqī, Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn b. ʿAlī. Al-Sunan Al-Kubrā. Edited by ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAtā, Muḥammad. 3rd edn. 11 vols. Dār al-Kutub al-῾Ilmiyya, 2003.Google Scholar
Bearman, P., Bianquis, T., Bosworth, C.E., van Donzel, E., and Heinrichs, W.P., eds. “Bāligh.” Encyclopaedia of Islam. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Bidelman, Patrick Kay. Pariahs Stand Up!: The Founding of the Liberal Feminist Movement in France, 1858–1889. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Blakesley, Christopher. “Child Custody and Parental Authority in France, Louisiana and Other States of the United States: A Comparative Analysis.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 4:2 (1981), 283–359. http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol4/iss2/3.Google Scholar
Buhūtī, Manṣūr b. Yūnus b. Idrīs al-. Sharḥ Muntahā Al-Irādāt Daqāʾiq Ūlā Al-Nahy Li-Sharḥ Al-Muntahā. Edited by al-Turkī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿAbd al-Muḥsin. 7 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 2000.Google Scholar
Burak, Guy. “Evidentiary Truth Claims, Imperial Registers, and the Ottoman Archive: Contending Legal Views of Archival and Record-Keeping Practices in Ottoman Greater Syria (Seventeenth-Nineteenth Centuries).” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 79:2 (2016), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burak, Guy The Second Formation of Islamic Law: The Hanafi School in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin N. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Case No. 7 of 8th Judicial Year (Supreme Constitutional Court May 15, 1993).Google Scholar
“Case No. 15277 of 78th Judicial Year (Court of Cassation).” Maḥkamat Al-Naqd: Majmūʿat Al-Aḥkām Al-Ṣādira Min Al-Hayʾa Al-ʿĀmma Lil-Mawād Al-Madaniyya Wa-Min Al-Dawāir Al-Madaniyya, 2009.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of the Child. “Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Egypt.” United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, July 15, 2011. www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/MENARegion/Pages/EGIndex.aspx.Google Scholar
“Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt 2014.” www.sis.gov.eg. Accessed July 7, 2016. www.sis.gov.eg/Newvr/Dustor-en001.pdf.Google Scholar
Coons, John E., and Mnookin, Robert H.. “Toward a Theory of Children’s Rights.” In The Child and the Courts. Edited by Baxter, Ian F.G and Eberts, Mary A.. Toronto: Carswell Co., 1978.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman’s Sphere” in New England, 1780–1835. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F. “Legal Pragmatism and Intellectual Property Law.” In Intellectual Property and the Common Law. Edited by Balganesh, Shyamkrishna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 211–229.Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F. “Legal Pragmatism and the Law and Economics Movement.” Georgetown Law Journal 84:6 (1996): 2071–2142.Google Scholar
Coulson, Noel James. A History of Islamic Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
“Court of Al-Bāb Al-ʿĀlī, Sijill 1 (937/1530), Archival Code 1001–000001,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Al-Bāb Al-ʿĀlī, Sijill 3 (939/1533), Archival Code 1001–000003,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Al-Bāb Al-ʿĀlī, Sijill 55 (1000/1592), Archival Code 1001–000104,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Al-Bāb Al-ʿĀlī, Sijill 293 (1190/1776), Archival Code 1001–000656,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Al-Bāb Al-ʿĀlī, Sijill 311 (1202/1787–8), Archival Code 1001–000702,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Babay Al-Saʿāda Wa’l-Kharq, Sijill 1 (1050/1640), Archival Code 1011–000101,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Būlāq, Sijill 26 (1016/1607), Archival Code 1005–000101,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Būlāq, Sijill 64 (1130/1718), Archival Code 1005–000304,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 1 (934/1528), Archival Code 1006–000001,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 3 (950/1544), Archival Code 1006–000003,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 4 (955/1548), Archival Code 1006–000004,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 8 (971/1564), Archival Code 1006–000008,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 10 (978/1570), Archival Code 1006–000010,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 13 (991/1583), Archival Code 1006–000151,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 15 (1018/1609), Archival Code 1006–000153,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 16 (1025/1616), Archival Code 1006–000154,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 17 (1053/1643), Archival Code 1006–000155,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 18 (1057/1647), Archival Code 1006–000156,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 20 (1076/1665–6), Archival Code 1006–000158,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 21 (1081/1670), Archival Code 1006–000159,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 22 (1092–1681), Archival Code 1006–000160,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 31 (1217–1802), Archival Code 1006–000169,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Qadīma, Sijill 38 (1308–1887), Archival Code 1006–000176,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Sharʿiyya, Sijill 61 (1306/1895), Archival Code 1017–000160,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Miṣr Al-Sharʿiyya, Sijill 1146 (1253/1837), Archival Code 1017–004051,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Mudīriyyat Al-Gharbiyya (Ṭanṭā), Sijill 11 (1244/1828), Archival Code 1033–000011,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Mudīriyyat Al-Gharbiyya (Ṭanṭā), Sijill 14 (1250/1835), Archival Code 1033–000014,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Mudīriyyat Al-Gharbiyya (Ṭanṭā), Sijill 31 (1264/1848), Archival Code 1033–000031,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Mudīriyyat Asyūṭ, Sijill 73 (1887), Archival Code 1139–000130,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qanāṭir Al-Sibāʿ, Sijill 3 (961/1554), Archival Code 1007–000003,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿArabiyya, Sijill 1 (968–9/1561), Archival Code 1004–000001,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿArabiyya, Sijill 2 (970–1/1562–3), Archival Code 1004–000002,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿArabiyya, Sijill 3 (973/1566), Archival Code 1004–000003,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿArabiyya, Sijill 80 (1115/1704), Archival Code 1004–000405,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿArabiyya, Sijill 140 (1206/1792), Archival Code 1004–000703,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿAskariyya, Sijill 1 (961/1554), Archival Code 1003–000001,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿAskariyya, Sijill 26 (1019/1610), Archival Code 1003–000105,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Qisma ʿAskariyya, Sijill 212 (1211/ 1796), Archival Code 1003–001009,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
“Court of Ṣāliḥiyya Al-Najmiyya, Sijill 3 (951/1544), Archival Code 1012–000003,” Dār al-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, Cairo.Google Scholar
Crecelius, Daniel. “Incidences of Waqf Cases in Three Cairo Courts: 1640–1802.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 29:2 (1986): 176–189.Google Scholar
Cuno, Kenneth M. “African Slaves in Nineteenth-Century Rural Egypt: A Preliminary Assessment.” In Race and Slavery in the Middle East: Histories of Trans-Saharan Africans in Nineteenth-Century Egypt, Sudan, and the Ottoman Mediterranean. Edited by Walz, Terence and Cuno, Kenneth M.. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2010, 77–98. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=891298.Google Scholar
Cuno, Kenneth M. Modernizing Marriage: Family, Ideology, and Law in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Egypt. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Cuno, Kenneth M. “The Era of Muḥammad ʿAlī.” In The Islamic World in the Age of Western Dominance: The New Cambridge History of Islam. Edited by Robinson, Francis. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 5:79–106.Google Scholar
Currie, James Dawud, Muhammad. “Kadizadeli Ottoman Scholarship, Muḥammad Ibn ʿabd Al-Wahhāb, and the Rise of the Saudi State.” Journal of Islamic Studies 26: 3 (2015): 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damīrī, Bahrām al-. Al-Shāmil Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Mālik. Edited by Najīb, Aḥmad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm. 2 vols. Cairo: Markaz Najībwayh li’l-Makhṭūṭāt wa-Khidmat al-Turāth, 2008.Google Scholar
al-Miṣriyya, Dār al-Iftāʾ. Al-Fatāwā Al-Islāmiyya Min Dār Al-Iftāʾ Al-Miṣriyya. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-Kutub wa’l-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, 2012.Google Scholar
Dardīr, Abū al-Barakāt Aḥmad b. al-, and al-Ṣāwī, Aḥmad b. Muḥammad. Al-Sharḥ Al-Saghīr ʿalā Aqrab Al-Masālik Ilā Madhhab Al-Imām Mālik. Edited by Waṣfī, Muṣṭafā Kamāl. Cairo: Muṣṭafā Kamāl, 1986.Google Scholar
Dasūqī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad b. ʿArafa al-. Ḥāshiyat Al-Dasūqī ʿalā Al-Sharḥ Al-Kabīr. 4 vols. Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya, 1984.Google Scholar
Dedek, Helge. “The Splendour of Form: Scholastic Jurisprudence and ‘Irrational Formality’.” Law and Humanities 5:2 (2011): 349–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. “Logical Method and Law.” Philosophical Review 33: 6 (1924): 560–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupret, Baudouin. Standing Trial: Law and the Person in the Modern Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, John. “The Interests of the Child and the Child’s Wishes: The Role of Dynamic Self-Determinism.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 8:1 (1994): 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Alami, Dawoud S. “Law No. 100 of 1985 Amending Certain Provisions of Egypt’s Personal Status Laws.” Islamic Law and Society 1:1 (January 1994): 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, Robert E. Renegotiating Family Relationships: Divorce, Child Custody, and Mediation. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ener, Mine. Managing Egypt’s Poor and the Politics of Benevolence, 1800–1952. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Barbara Alpern. Breaking the Ties That Bound: The Politics of Marital Strife in Late Imperial Russia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergene, Boğaç A. Local Court, Provincial Society, and Justice in the Ottoman Empire Legal Practice and Dispute Resolution in Çankırı and Kastamonu (1652–1744). Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Evans, Hugh Davey. Maryland Common Law Practice: A Treatise on the Course of Proceeding in the Common Law Courts of the State of Maryland. Baltimore, MD: J. Robinson, 1839.Google Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad. “The Social Logic of Taqlīd and the Rise of the Mukhtaṣar.” Islamic Law and Society 3:2 (1996): 193–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahīm, Muḥarram, ed. “Case No. 55 of 1929–30, Al-Manṣūra Sharia Court of First Instance.” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:8 (1930): 644–738.Google Scholar
Fahīm, Muḥarram ed. “Iftitāḥiyyat Al-ʿAdad Al-Awwal Min Al-Sana Al-Thāniya.” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 2:1 (October 1930): 1–4.Google Scholar
Fahīm, Muḥarram. “Qawānīn Wa-Qarārāt Wa-Awāmir Wa-Manshūrāt.” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 24:1 (1953), 126–127.Google Scholar
Fahmy, Khaled. All the Pasha’s Men: Mehmed Ali, His Army, and the Making of Modern Egypt. Cairo; New York, NY American University in Cairo Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. “Legal Pragmatism and the Constitution.” Minnesota Law Review 72 (1987–1988): 1331–1387.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. “The Inevitability of Practical Reason: Statutes, Formalism, and the Rule of Law.” Vanderbilt Law Review 45 (1992): 533–559.Google Scholar
Faron, Olivier. “Father Child Relations in France: Changes in Paternal Authority in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” The History of the Family 6:3 (2001): 365–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fish, Stanley. “Almost Pragmatism: Richard Posner’s Jurisprudence.” The University of Chicago Law Review 57:4 (1990): 1447–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. Families in Former Times: Kinship, Household, and Sexuality in Early Modern France. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Fulchiron, Hugues. Autorité parentale et parents désunis. Paris: Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1985.Google Scholar
Fulchiron, Hugues. “Custody and Separated Families: The Example of French Law.” Family Law Quarterly 39:2 (2005): 301–313.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Jacqueline. “Orphanages in Egypt.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 40:4 (2005): 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giladi, A. “Ṣaghīr.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam. Bearman, P., Bianquis, T., Bosworth, C.E., van Donzel, E., and Heinrichs, W.P., eds. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Giladi, Avner. Children of Islam: Concepts of Childhood in Medieval Muslim Society. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giladi, Avner Infants, Parents and Wet Nurses: Medieval Islamic Views on Breastfeeding and Their Social Implications. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Michael. The American Family in Social-Historical Perspective. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture the Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʻAbbāsid Society (2nd–4th/8th–10th Centuries). London; New York, NY: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
“Ḥaḍānat Al-Aṭfāl.” Cairo: National Council for Women, n.d. www.conference.ncwegypt.com/index.php/docsara/140-custody.Google Scholar
Ḥajjāwī, Sharaf al-Dīn Mūsā b. Sālim Abū al-Najā al-. Al-Iqnāʿ Li-Ṭālib Al-Intifāʿ. Edited by al-Muḥsin al-Turk, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿAbd. 3rd edn. Riyadh: Darat al-Malik ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, 2002.Google Scholar
Ḥalabī, Ibrāhīm b. Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-, Dāmād Afandī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad b. Sulaymān al-Kalībūlī, and al-Ḥiṣnī al-Ḥaṣkafī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. Multaqā Al-Abḥur; Majmaʿ Al-Anhur: Al-Durr Al-Muntaqā Fī Sharḥ Al-Multaqā. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1998.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wael B, Hallaq. “The Qāḍī’s Dīwān (Sijill) before the Ottomans.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 61:3 (1998): 415–436.Google Scholar
Hanna, Nelly. “Marriage among Merchant Families in Seventeenth-Century Cairo.” In Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History. Edited by Sonbol, Amira El Azhary. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996, 143–145.Google Scholar
Muḥammad al-Ḥiṣnī al-, Ḥaṣkafī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b., and al-Ghazzī al-Timurtāshī, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd Allāh b. Aḥmad. Al-Durr Al-Mukhtār Sharḥ Tanwīr Al-Abṣār Wa-Jāmiʿ Al-Biḥār. Edited by ʿAbd al-Munʿim Khalīl Ibrāhīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub, 2002.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Jane. The Arab Lands under Ottoman Rule, 1516–1800. Harlow; New York, NY: Pearson Longman, 2008.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Jane The Politics of Households in Ottoman Egypt: The Rise of the Qazdağlis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Haytamī, Ibn Ḥajar al-. Al-Fatāwā Al-Kubrā Al-Fiqhiyya. 4 vols. Cairo: ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Aḥmad Ḥanafī, n.d.Google Scholar
Heyworth-Dunne, J. An Introduction to the History of Education in Modern Egypt. 2nd edn. London: Frank Cass and Company Limited, 1968.Google Scholar
al-Ḥusayn al-Muḥaqqiq al-, Ḥillī, Abū al-Qāsim Najm al-Dīn Jaʿfar b.. Sharāʾiʿ Al-Islām Fī Masāʾil Al-Ḥalāl Wa’l-Ḥarām. Edited by al-Shīrāzī, Āyat Allāh al-Sayyid Ṣādiq. 10th edn. Beirut: Markaz al-Rasūl al-Aʿẓam li’l-Taḥqīq wa’l-Nashr, 1998.Google Scholar
Hirschler, Konrad. “From Archive to Archival Practices: Rethinking the Preservation of Mamluk Administrative Documents.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 136:1 (2016): 1–28.Google Scholar
Hoexter, Miriam. “Qāḍī, Muftī and Ruler: Their Roles in the Development of Islamic Law.” In Law, Custom, and Statute in the Muslim World. Edited by Shaham, Ron. Leiden: Brill, 2006, 67–85.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher. The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Margaret. Women in Eighteenth Century Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, F. Robert. Egypt under the Khedives, 1805–1879: From Household Government to Modern Bureaucracy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Ḥājib, Jamāl al-Dīn b. ʿUmar. Jāmiʿ Al-Ummahāt. Edited by al-Akhḍar al-Akhḍarī, Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Damascus: Al-Yamāma, 1998.Google Scholar
Ibn Mufliḥ al-Maqdisī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad. Kitāb Al-Furūʿ. Edited by Turkī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿAbd al-Muḥsin. 1st edn. Riyadh: Muʾassassat al-Risāla, 2003.Google Scholar
Ibn Qudāma al-Maqdisī, Muwaffaq al-Dīn. Al-Mughnī. Edited by Abī ʿAlafa, Rāʾid b. Ṣabrī b.. Beirut: Bayt al-Afkār al-Dawliyya, 2004.Google Scholar
Ibn Qudāma al-Maqdisī, Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʿUmdat Al-Fiqh Fi’l-Madhhab Al-Ḥanbalī. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAzzūz, Aḥmad. Beirut: Al-Maktaba al-ʿAṣriyya, 2003.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. Majmūʿ Fatāwā Shaykh Al-Islām Aḥmad Ibn Taymiyya. Edited by Qāsim, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad Ibn and Muḥammad Ibn Qāsim, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b.. 37 vols. Riyadh: Wizārat al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyya wa’l-Awqāf wa’l-Daʿwa wa’l-Irshād, 2004.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn Risāla Fī Taslīm Al-Bint Ilā Al-Abb Aw Al-Umm. Edited by Muḥammad al-Kibbī, Saʿd al-Dīn b.. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Maʿārif li’l-Nashr wa’l-Tawzīʿ, 2010.Google Scholar
Abū ʿUmar Yūsuf, Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr. Al-Kāfī Fī Fiqh Ahl Al-Madīna Al-Mālikī. 2nd edn. 1 vol. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1992.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn. Majmūʿat Rasāʾil Ibn ʿĀbidīn. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2014.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīr b. ʿUmar, and al-Ḥiṣnī al-Ḥaṣkafī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. Radd Al-Muḥtār ʿalā Al-Durr Al-Mukhtār Sharḥ Tanwīr Al-Abṣār. Edited by ʿĀdil Aḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawjūd, ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwaḍ, and Ismāʿīl, Muḥammad Bakr. 14 vols. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Dār ʿĀlam al-Kutub, 2003.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry . “Al-Shaʿrānī’s Response to Legal Purism: A Theory of Legal Pluralism.” Islamic Law and Society 20:1–2 (2013): 110–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. “Islamic Law as a Discursive Tradition.” In Sustainable Diversity in Law: Essays in Memory of H. Patrick Glenn. Edited by Dedek, Helge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry Pragmatism in Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry Pragmatism in Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. 2nd edn. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. “Rethinking the Taqlīd Hegemony: An Institutional, Longue-Durée Approach.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 136:4 (2016): 801–816.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. “Rethinking the Taqlīd-Ijtihād Dichotomy: A Conceptual-Historical Approach.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 136:2 (2016): 285–303.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. “The Codification Episteme in Islamic Juristic Discourse between Inertia and Change.” Islamic Law and Society 22:3 (2015): 157–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibyānī Bek, Muḥammad Zayn. Sharḥ Al-Aḥkām Al-Sharʿīyya Fi’l-Aḥwāl Al-Shakhṣiyya. 1st edn. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-Nahḍa, 1919.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil, and Quataert, Donald. An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
ʿĪsā, ʿAbd al-Rāziq. Al-Marʾa Al-Miṣriyya Qabl Al-Ḥadātha Mukhtārāt Min Wathāʾiq Al-ʿAṣr Al-ʿUthmānī. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub wa’l-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, 2012.Google Scholar
Ivanyi, Katharina Anna. “Virtue, Piety and the Law: A Study of Birgivi Mehmed Efendi’s Al-Tariqa Al-Muhammadiyya,” 2012. http://dataspace.princeton.edu/jspui/handle/88435/dsp015d86p0259.Google Scholar
Jabartī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Ḥasan al-. ʿAjāʾib Al-Āthār Fi’l-Tarājim Wa’l-Akhbār. Edited by ʿAbd al-Raḥīm, ʿAbd al-Raḥīm ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub wa’l-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, 1998.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sherman. Islamic Law and the State: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Shihāb Al-Dīn Al-Qarāfī. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sherman A.. “Kramer versus Kramer in a Tenth/Sixteenth Century Egyptian Court: Post-Formative Jurisprudence between Exigency and Law.” Islamic Law and Society 8:1 (2001): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sherman A. “Taqlīd, Legal Scaffolding and the Scope of Legal Injunctions in Post-Formative Theory: Muṭlaq and ʿĀmm in the Jurisprudence of Shihāb Al-Dīn Al-Qarāfī.” Islamic Law and Society 3:2 (1996): 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jallād, Philip B. Yūsuf. Qāmūs Al-Idāra Wa’l-Qaḍāʾ. 3 vols. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-Kutub wa’l-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, 2003.Google Scholar
Jawziyya, Ibn Qayyim al-. Iʿlām Al-Muwaqqiʿīn ʿan Rabb Al-ʿĀlamīn. Edited by Ḥasan Āl Salmān, Abū ʿUbayda Mashhūr b. and Aḥmad, Abū ʿUmar Aḥmad ʿAbd Allāh. 7 vols. Riyadh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī, 2002.Google Scholar
Jawziyya, Ibn Qayyim al- Tuḥfat Al-Mawdūd Bi-Aḥkām Al-Mawlūd. Edited by Jumʿa Ḍumayriyya, ʿUthmān b.. Jedda: Dār ʿĀlam al-Fawāʾid, 2010.Google Scholar
Jawziyya, Ibn Qayyim al- Zād Al-Maʿād Fī Hudā Khayr Al-ʿIbād. Edited by al-Arnaʾūṭ, Shuʿayb and al-Arnaʾūṭ, ʿAbd al-Qādir. 3rd edn. 6 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1998.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. “Formes de Langage et Fonctions Publiques: Stéréotypes, Témoins et Offices Dans La Preuve Par l’écrit En Droit Musulman.” Arabica 44:3 (1997): 333–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, Baber. “Signs as Evidence: The Doctrine of Ibn Taymiyya (1263–1328) and Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya (d. 1351) on Proof.” Islamic Law and Society 9:2 (2002): 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jumʿa, ʿAlī. Al-Fatāwā Al-Islāmiyya Min Dār Al-Iftāʾ Al-Miṣriyya. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-Kutub wa’l-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, 2010.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Y.S. “Child Custody in Jewish Law: From Authority of the Father to the Best Interest of the Child.” Journal of Law and Religion 24:1 (2009): 89–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kāsānī, Alāʾ al-Dīn al-. Badāʾiʿ Al-Ṣanāʾiʿ Fī Tartīb Al-Sharāʾiʿ. Edited by Muʿawwaḍ, ʿAlī Muḥammad and ʿAbd al-Mawjūd, ʿĀdil Aḥmad. 2nd edn. 10 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2003.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89:8 (1976): 1685–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kholoussy, Hanan. For Better, For Worse: The Marriage Crisis That Made Modern Egypt. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Klinck, Dennis R. Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England. Surrey: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H. “The Philosopher-Judge: Some Friendly Criticisms of Richard Posner’s Jurisprudence.” The Modern Law Review 59:3 (1996): 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Law No. 4 (2005) Amending Art. 20 of Decree-Law No. 25 of 1920.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya 9:2 (March 8, 2005): 3.Google Scholar
“Law No. 10 (2004) Promulgating the Law on the Establishment of the Family Courts.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya 12:2 (March 18, 2004): 3–9.Google Scholar
“Law No. 13 (1968) of Civil and Commercial Procedure.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya, n.d.Google Scholar
“Law No. 25 (1920) Concerning Maintenance and Certain Matters of Personal Status.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya, July 15, 1920.Google Scholar
“Law No. 25 (1929).” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya 27 (March 25, 1929): 203–219.Google Scholar
“Law No. 44 (1979) Amending Some of the Rules of Personal Status Law.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya 25:2 (June 21, 1979): 1–4.Google Scholar
“Law No. 100 (1985) Amending Certain Provisions of Egypt’s Personal Status Laws.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya 27 (July 4, 1985), 4–11.Google Scholar
“Law No. 119 (1952) Governing Guardianship over Property.” Al-Waqāʾiʿ Al-Miṣriyya, August 4, 1952, 12–15.Google Scholar
Layish, Aharon. Divorce in the Libyan Family: A Study Based on the Sijills of the Sharīʻa Courts of Ajdābiyya and Kufra. New York, NY; Jerusalem: New York University Press; Magnes Press, the Hebrew University, 1991.Google Scholar
Levit, Nancy. “Practically Unreasonable – A Critique of Practical Reason: A Review of the Problems of Jurisprudence by Richard A. Posner.” Northwestern University Law Review 85:2 (1991): 494–518.Google Scholar
Libson, Gideon. Jewish and Islamic Law: A Comparative Study of Custom during the Geonic Period. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor B. Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c 800–1830: Volume 2 Mainland Mirrors: Europe, Japan, China, South Asia, and the Islands. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Linant De Bellefonds, Yvon. “Ḥaḍāna.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam. Edited by Bearman, P., Bianquis, Th, Bosworth, C.E., van Donzel, E., and Heinrichs, W.P.. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Linant de Bellefonds, Yvon. Traité de Droit Musulman Comparé. Paris, LaHaye: Mouton et Cie, 1965.Google Scholar
Mahdī, Muḥammad al-ʿAbbāsī al-. Al-Fatāwā Al-Mahdiyya Fi’l-Waqāʿiʿ Al-Miṣriyya. 1st edn. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azharīyya al-Miṣriyya, 1883.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maidment, Susan. Child Custody and Divorce: The Law in Social Context. Croom: Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
Mainardi, Patricia. Husbands, Wives, and Lovers: Marriage and Its Discontents in Nineteenth-Century France. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mardāwī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī b. Sulaymān al-. Al-Inṣāf Fī Maʿrifat Al-Rājiḥ Min Al-Khilāf. Edited by Abī ʿAlfa, Rāʾid b. Ṣabrī Ibn. 2 vols. Beirut: Bayt al-Afkār al-Dawliyya, 2004.Google Scholar
Margolis, Maxine L. Mothers and Such: Views of American Women and Why They Changed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mason, Mary Ann. From Father’s Property to Children’s Rights: The History of Child Custody in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Matthews, Glenna. “Just a Housewife”: The Rise and Fall of Domesticity in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Māwardī, Abū Ḥasan ʿAlī al-.Al-Ḥāwī Al-Kabīr. Edited by Maḥmūd Maṭrajī, Yāsīn Nāṣir Maḥmūd al-Khaṭīb, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Shumayla al-Ahdal, Ḥasan ʿAlī Kūrkūlū, and Aḥmad Ḥājj Muḥammad Shaykh Māḥī. 22 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1994.Google Scholar
Meriwether, Margaret L. “The Rights of Children and the Responsibilities of Women: Women as Wasis in Ottoman Aleppo, 1770–1840.” In Women, the Family, and Divorce Laws in Islamic History. Edited by Sonbol, Amira El Azhary. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996, 219–235.Google Scholar
Miṣrī, Ibn Nujaym Zayn al-Dīn al-, Abū al-Barakāt ʿAbd Allāh Ḥāfiẓ al-Dīn al-Nasafī, and Amīn Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad. Al-Baḥr Al-Rāʾiq Sharḥ Kanz Al-Daqāʾiq Wa-Maʿahu Al-Ḥawāshī Al-Musammāh Minḥat Al-Khāliq ʿalā Al-Baḥr Al-Rāʾiq. Edited by ʿUmayrāt, Zakariyyā. 9 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. Colonising Egypt. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Morris, Rosalind C, and Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Murphy, John P. Pragmatism: From Peirce to Davidson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mūsā, Aḥmad. “Khināqa ʿalā Al-Hawāʾ Bayna Ḍuyūf Aḥmad Mūsā Bi-Sabab Qānūn Ḥaḍānit Al-Aṭfāl.” Cairo, December 21, 2016. www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbJAh6E9R6Y.Google Scholar
Mūsā, Aḥmad Farīd. “Ḥalaqa Nāriyya ʿan Qānūn Al-Usra.” Cairo: al-Balad, December 20, 2016. www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IA5P6DNDao.Google Scholar
Nabil, Sally. “Ḥaḍānat Al-Aṭfāl Tuthīru Jadalan Fī Miṣr.” London: BBC, December 22, 2016. www.bbc.com/arabic/media-38404013.Google Scholar
Nawawī, Muḥyī al-Dīn Abū Zakariyyā al-. Rawḍat Al-Ṭālibīn. Edited by al-Shāwīsh, Zuhayr. 12 vols. Beirut: Maktab al-Islāmī, 1991.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 55 of 1929–1930 (Manṣūra Sharia Court of First Instance).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:8 (1929): 698–701.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 58 of 1946–47 (Asyūt Sharia Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 20:1 (1948–1949): 205–207.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 79 of 1929–1930 (Sharia Summary Court of Damietta).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:6 (1929): 537–538.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 220 of 1954 (Miṣr Al-Jadīda Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:4 (1954): 304–305.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 272 of 1929–1930 (Miṣr Sharia Court of First Instance).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:5 (1929): 417.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 283 of 1954 (Wāylī Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:7 (1954): 453–459.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 288 of 1954 (Sayyida Zaynab Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:1 (1954): 111–112.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 295 of 1948 (ʿAṭṭārīn Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:1 (1954): 99–105.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 391 of 1928–1929 (Sharia Court of Shabrakhīt).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:4 (1929): 325.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 547 of 1922–1923 (Miṣr Sharia Court of Summary Justice).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:5 (1929):418–419.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 660 of 1945–1946 (Al-Minyā Sharia Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:1 (1954): 76–78.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 812 of 1943–44 (The Aqṣur Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 16:9–10 (1944): 250–251.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 861 of 1954 (Sanballāwīn Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:7 (1954): 448–450.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1025 of 1928–9 (Al-Labbān Court of Summary Justice).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā, 1929, 714–715.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1069 of 1934–35 (Miṣr Sharia Court of First Instance).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 8:1 (1936–1937): 195–198.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1182 of 1946–47 (Asyūt Sharia Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 20:1 (1948–1949): 89–91.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1239 of 1928–9 (The Jamāliyya Court of Summary Justice).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:2 (1929): 320–321.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1449 of 1949–40 (Shubra Sharia Court of Summary Justice).” Edited by al-Qāḍī, ʿAbd al-Razzāq. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 11:1 (1939–1940): 128–129.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1811 of 1952 (Mīt Ghamra Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 25:1 (1954): 80–82.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 1888 of 1928–1929 (The Azbakiyya Court of Summary Justice).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:4 (1929): 321–323.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 2528 of 1928–9 (The Azbakiyya Court of Summary Justice).” Edited by Muḥarram, Fahīm. Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 1:6 (1929): 521–522.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn. “Case No. 3102 of 1951 (Sayyida Zaynab Sharia Court of Summary Justice).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 24:1 (1953): 106–109.Google Scholar
al-Sharʿiyīn, Niqābat al-Muḥāmiyyīn, and al-Qāḍī, ʿAbd al-Razzāq. “Case No. 2037 of 1937 (Miṣr Sharia Court of First Instance).” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Khāmisa Wa’l-ʿIshrīn 11:2 (1939): 67–68.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Robert E., and Steegh, Nancy Ver. Family Law. New York: Aspen Publishers Online, 2007.Google Scholar
Sheikh, Mustapha. Ottoman Puritanism and Its Discontents: Ahmad Al-Aqhisari and the Qadizadelis. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Owen, Roger. Cotton and the Egyptian Economy, 1820–1914: A Study in Trade and Development. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Parker, Stephen. “The Best Interests of the Child – Principles and Problems.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 8:1 (1994): 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Leslie P. Morality Tales Law and Gender in the Ottoman Court of Aintab. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Rudolph. “Muḥammad Al-ʿAbbāsī Al-Mahdī (D. 1897), Grand Muftī of Egypt, and His ‘Al-Fatāwā Al-Mahdiyya.’” Islamic Law and Society 1:1 (1994): 66–82.Google Scholar
Peters, Rudolph. “The Battered Dervishes of Bab Zuwayla: A Religious Riot in Eighteenth-Century Cairo.” In Eighteenth Century Renewal and Reform in Islam. Edited by Levtzion, Nehemia and Voll, John. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1987, 66–82.Google Scholar
Peters, Rudolph. “What Does It Mean to Be an Official Madhhab?” In The Islamic School of Law: Evolution, Devolution, and Progress. Edited by Bearman, Peri, Peters, Rudolph, and Vogel, Frank E. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005, 149–152.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.. “Pragmatic Adjudication.” Cardozo Law Review 18 (1996–1997): 1–20.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pruett, Marsha Kleine, and Barker, Carrie. The Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions. Edited by Galatzer-Levy, Robert M, Kraus, Louis, and Galatzer-Levy, Jeanne. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2009.Google Scholar
Putnam, Ruth Anna. “Justice in Context.” Southern California Law Review 63 (1990 1989): 1797–1810.Google Scholar
Putnam, Ruth Anna. “Taking Pragmatism Seriously.” In Hilary Putnam: Pragmatism and Realism. Edited by Contant, James and Żegleń, Urszula M.. London; New York, NY: Routledge, 2002, 7–11.Google Scholar
Qādirī, Muḥammad b. Ḥussain b. ʿAlī al-Ṭūrī al-. Takmilat Al-Baḥr Al-Rāʾiq Sharḥ Kanz Al-Daqāʾiq. Edited by ʿUmayrāt, Zakariyyā. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
Qarāfī, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Yaḥyā al-. “Taḥqīq Al-Ibāna Fī Ṣiḥḥat Isqāṭ Mā Lam Yajib Min Al-Ḥaḍāna.” In Min Khizānat Al-Madhhab Al-Mālikī. Edited by ʿAlī al-Qadhdhāfī, Jalāl. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2006, 349–428.Google Scholar
Qarāfī, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Yaḥyā al-. “Qatar Family Law No. 22 (2006).” Official Gazette 8 (August 28, 2006): 31–99.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Yossef. Marriage, Money and Divorce in Medieval Islamic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Yossef. “Royal Justice and Religious Law: Siyāsah and Shariʿah under the Mamluks.” Mamluk Studies Review 16 (2012): 71–102.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. Realistic Pragmatism: An Introduction to Pragmatic Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice.” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989–1990): 1811–1819.Google Scholar
Rosen, David M. “American Families and American Law.” In Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Edited by Sussman, Marvin B., Steinmetz, Suzanne K., and Peterson, Gary W., 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, 553–570.Google Scholar
Rubellin-Devichi, Jacqueline. “The Best Interests Principle in French Law and Practice.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 8:2 (August 1, 1994): 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, Behnam. The Logic of Law Making in Islam: Women and Prayer in the Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saʿīd al-Tanūkhī, Saḥnūn b.. Al-Mudawwana Al-Kubrā. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1994.Google Scholar
Salīm, Aḥmad. “Limādhā Athāra Iqtirāḥ Taʿdīl Qānūn Al-Ḥaḍāna Fī Miṣr Kull Hādhā Al-Jadal?” Raṣīf. December 12, 2016. http://raseef22.com/life/2016/12/09/%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B0%D8%A7-%D8%A3%D8%AB%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AD-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B6%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9/.Google Scholar
Salīm, ʿAbd al-Wahhāb. “Yajib Ilghāʾ Al-Majālis Al-Ḥasbiyya Wa-Ḍamm Ikhtiṣāṣihā Ilā Al-Maḥākim Al-Sharʿiyya: Iqtirāḥ ʿalā Maʿālī Wazīr Al-Ḥaqqāniyya.” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 2:1 (1930): 225–226.Google Scholar
Sayyid-Marsot, Afaf Lutfi. Women and Men in Late Eighteenth-Century Egypt. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford [Oxfordshire]; New York, NY: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Shāfiʻī, Muḥammad b. Idrīs al-. Al-Umm. Edited by ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib, Rifʿat Fawzī. 11 vols. Manṣūra: Dār al-Wafāʾ, 2001.Google Scholar
Shaham, Ron. Family and the Courts in Modern Egypt: A Study Based on Decisions by the Sharīʻa Courts, 1900–1955. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakry, Omnia. “Schooled Mothers and Structured Play: Child Rearing in Turn-of-the-Century Egypt.” In Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle East. Edited by Abu-Lughod, Lila. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998, 126–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirwānī, ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd al-, Aḥmad b. Qāsim al-ʿIbādī, and al-Haytamī, Ibn Ḥajar. Ḥawāshī Tuḥfat Al-Muḥtāj Bi-Sharḥ Al-Minhāj. Beirut: Dār Ṣadir, 1972.Google Scholar
Shaw, Stanford J. The Financial and Administrative Organization and Development of Ottoman Egypt, 1517–1798. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Shaw, Stanford J.. “The Land Law of Ottoman Egypt (960/1553): A Contribution to the Study of Landholding in the Early Years of Ottoman Rule in Egypt.” Der Islam 38:1 (1963): 106–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaybānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-. Al-Aṣl. Edited by Boynukalın, Mehmet. 12 vols. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2012.Google Scholar
Shestack, Jerome J. “The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 20:2 (1998): 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shīrāzī, Abū Isḥāq al-. Al-Muhadhdhab Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Al-Shāfiʿī. Edited by al-Zuḥaylī, Muḥammad. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, 1996.Google Scholar
Shirbīnī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad b. al-Khaṭīb al-. Mughnī Al-Muḥtāj Ilā Maʿrifat Maʿānī Alfāẓ Al-Minhāj. Edited by Khalīl ʿAytānī, Muḥammad. 1st edn. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1997.Google Scholar
Shook, John R., and Margolis, Joseph. A Companion to Pragmatism. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub., 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijistānī, Abū Dawūd Sulaymān b. al-Ashʿath al-. Sunan Abī Dawūd. Edited by al-Arnaʾūṭ, Shuʿayb and Qurabellī, Muḥammad Kāmil. Damascus: Dār al-Risāla al-ʿĀlamiyya, 2009.Google Scholar
Sinai, Yuval, and Shmueli, Benjamin. “Calabresi’s and Maimonides’s Tort Law Theories-A Comparative Analysis and a Preliminary Sketch of a Modern Model of Differential Pluralistic Tort Liability Based on the Two Theories.” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 26:1 (2015): 59–133.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph. “Legal Realism Now.” California Law Review 76:2, no. 2 (1988): 465–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. “Property and Coercion in Federal Indian Law: The Conflict between Critical and Complacent Pragmatism.” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989–1990): 1821–1841.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. “Interpretation and Legal Reasoning in Roman Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 70:4 (June 1, 1995): 1539–1556.Google Scholar
Stilt, Kristen. Islamic Law in Action: Authority, Discretion, and Everyday Experiences in Mamluk Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. Broken Lives: Separation and Divorce in England, 1660–1857. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence Road to Divorce: England 1530–1987. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subkī, Tāj al-Dīn al-. Muʿīd Al-Niʿam Wa-Mubīd Al-Niqam. Edited by ʿAlī al-Najjār, Muḥammad, Shalabī, Abū Zayd, and Abū al-ʿUyūn, Muḥammad. 1st edn. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1948.Google Scholar
Subkī, Tāj al-Dīn al-. “Supreme Constitutional Court Case No. 125 of 27th Judicial Year 2008.” Al-Jarīda Al-Rasmiyya 20:2 (May 19, 2008): 84–90.Google Scholar
Ṭahṭāwī, Rifāʿa al-. Al-Murshid Al-Amīn Li’l-Banāt Wa’l-Banīn. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-Miṣrī wa’l-Lubnānī, 2012.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B.Z. “Pragmatism in U.S. Legal Theory: Its Application to Normative Jurisprudence, Sociolegal Studies, and the Fact-Value Distinction.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 41:1 (1996): 315–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ṭayyib, Aḥmad al-. Al-Fatāwā Al-Islāmiyya Min Dār Al-Iftāʾ Al-Miṣriyya. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-Kutub wa’l-Wathāʾiq al-Qawmiyya, 2011.Google Scholar
Terman, Rochelle. “Islamophobia, Feminism and the Politics of Critique.” Theory, Culture & Society Theory, Culture & Society, 33:2 (2015): 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Tatjana, and Haukanes, Haldis. Parenting after the Century of the Child: Travelling Ideals, Institutional Negotiations and Individual Responses. Farnham, Surrey; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Toledano, Ehud R. “Review Article: Mehmet Ali Paşa or Muhammad Ali Basha? An Historiographic Appraisal in the Wake of a Recent Book.” Middle Eastern Studies 21:4 (1985): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledano, Ehud R. State and Society in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Egypt. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Trans-Atlantic Divorce Mediation Conference, Vermont Law School, and Dispute Resolution Project, eds. The Role of Mediation in Divorce Proceedings: A Comparative Perspective (United States, Canada and Great Britain). South Royalton, VT: Vermont Law School, 1987.Google Scholar
Tucker, Judith E. Women, Family, and Gender in Islamic Law. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Judith E. Women in Nineteenth-Century Egypt. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uniform Law Commission. “Marriage and Divorce Act, Model Summary.” Accessed February 9, 2015. www.uniformlaws.org/ActSummary.aspx?title=Marriage%20and%20Divorce%20Act,%20Model.Google Scholar
Vikør, Knut S. Between God and the Sultan: A History of Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wadud, Amina. Inside the Gender Jihad: Women’s Reform in Islam. Oxford: Oneworld, 2006.Google Scholar
Wakako, Kumakura. “Who Handed over Mamluk Land Registers to the Ottomans? A Study on the Administrators of Land Records in the Late Mamluk Period.” Mamluk Studies Review XVIII (2014–2015): 279–298.Google Scholar
Wansharīsī, Abū al-ʿAbbās Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā al-. Al-Manhaj Al-Fāʾiq Wa’l-Manhal Al-Rāʾiq Wa’l-Maʿnā Al-Lāʾiq Bi-Ādāb Al-Muwaththiq Wa-Aḥkām Al-Wathāʾiq. Edited by ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Aṭram, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Ḥammūd b.. 2 vols. Dubai: Dār al-Buḥūth li’l-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyya, 2005.Google Scholar
Warner, Richard. “Pragmatism and Legal Reasoning.” In Hilary Putnam: Pragmatism and Realism. Edited by Contant, James and Żegleń, Urszula M.. London; New York, NY: Routledge, 2002, 25–37.Google Scholar
al-ʿAdl, Wizārat. “Law No. 118 (1952) on the Forfeiture of Guardianship over the Person.” Tashrīʿāt, 1953, 12–15.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore J. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York; London: Free Press; Collier Macmillan, 1985.Google Scholar
Welchman, Lynn. Women and Muslim Family Laws in Arab States: A Comparative Overview of Textual Development and Advocacy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
West, Cornel. The American Evasion of Philosophy a Genealogy of Pragmatism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Steven Harmon. The U.S. Justice System: Law and Constitution in Early America. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2012.Google Scholar
Wroath, John. Until They Are Seven: The Origins of Women’s Legal Rights. Winchester: Waterside Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Yousef, Hoda A. Composing Egypt: Reading, Writing, and the Emergence of a Modern Nation 1870–1930. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Zahraa, Mahdi, and Malek, Normi A.. “The Concept Of Custody In Islamic Law.” Arab Law Quarterly 13:2 (1998): 55–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarqānī, ʿAbd al-Bāqī b. Yūsuf al-. Sharḥ Al-Zarqānī ʿalā Mukhtaṣar Sayyidī Khalīl Wa-Maʿahu Al-Fatḥ Al-Rabbānī Fīmā Dhahala ʿanhu Al-Zarqānī. Edited by Muḥammad Amīn, ʿAbd al-Salām. 8 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2002.Google Scholar
Zayn, Muḥammad al-. “Al-Majālis Al-Ḥasbiyya.” Al-Muḥāmā Al-Sharʿiyya: Majalla Qaḍāʾiyya Shahriyya Al-Sana Al-Ūlā 2:1 (1930): 19–23.Google Scholar
Ze’evi, Dror. “The Use of Ottoman Sharīʿa Court Records As a Source for Middle Eastern Social History: A Reappraisal.” ILS Islamic Law and Society 5: 1 (1998): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilfi, Madeline C. The Politics of Piety: The Ottoman Ulema in the Postclassical Age (1600–1800). Minneapolis, MN: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1988.Google Scholar
Zuḥaylī, Wahba al-. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa-Adillatuhu. 2nd edn. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.Google Scholar