Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:22:02.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

Hannah Čulík-Baird
Hannah Čulík-Baird
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cicero and the Early Latin Poets , pp. 279 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, M. von. 1997. A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M. von. 2003. Cicero’s Style. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C. 1990. Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C. 2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Allen, J. 2005. “The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology.” In Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Language and Learning. Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. D. 1966. Ethos and Education in Greek Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von. (ed.) 1903–1924. Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Artigas, E. 2009. Marc Pacuvi, Tragèdies. Fragments. Barcelona: Fundació Bernat Metge.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. 1978. Cato the Censor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Atzert, C. 1908. De Cicerone interprete Graecorum, dissertation. Göttingen: Acad. Huthiana.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. 1960. Cicero Pro Caelio. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1972. “Ennius and His Friends.” In Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 17. Geneva: Fondation Hardt. 151–208.Google Scholar
Baehrens, A. 1886. Fragmenta Poetarum Romanorum. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Baker, N. 1991. U and I: A True Story. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. 2019. “Metallurgical Imagination: the Prometheus Triology.” In Braund, D., Hall, E., Wyles, R. (eds.), Ancient Theatre and Performance Culture around the Black Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1992. “Greek in Cicero’s Letters.” Acta Classica 35: 1–17.Google Scholar
Barrile, A. R. 1969. Frammenti. Dalle tragedie e dalle preteste. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A. 1983. Lawyers in Roman Republican Politics. A Study of the Roman Jurists in their Political Setting, 316–82 BC. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 75. Munich: C H Beck.Google Scholar
Beare, W. 1955. “Scaenicorum Romanorum Fragmenta edidit Alfredus Klotz.” Classical Review 5.2: 170–171.Google Scholar
Beare, W. 1964. The Roman Stage. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Behrendt, A. 2013. Mit Zitaten kommunizieren: Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero. Litora classica, 6. Rahden, Westphalia: VML Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1912. Laughter. An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2018. “Pessimus omnium poeta: Canonization and the Ancient Reception of Cicero’s Poetry.” ICS 43.1: 137–159.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2019. Cicero, Greek Learning, and the Making of a Roman Classic. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchot, M. 1995. The Writing of the Disaster. Translated by A. Smock. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. 1995. Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum praeter Ennium et Lucilium. Post W. Morel novis curis adhibitis ed. Büchner, C.. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: the Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der. 2016. Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. 1973. The Anxiety of Influence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 2011. The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bonaria, M. 1965. Romani Mimi. Rome: Athenae.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bosak-Schroeder, C. 2020. Other Natures: Environmental Encounters with Ancient Greek. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 2006. An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 2017. Seneca: Thyestes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L. 1976. A Word Index to Plato. Leeds: W. S. Maney and Son.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, Vol. 1. American Philological Association Philological Monographs. New York: American Philological Association.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1965. “Amicitia in the Late Roman Republic.” PCPS 191: 1–20.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1979. “Cicero and Historiography.” In Miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni, 1.311–40. Rome: Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. 1982. Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum praeter Ennium et Lucilium. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2002. The Hand of Cicero. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1976. Circus Factions. Blues and Greens at Rome and Byzantium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cappello, O. 2019. The School of Doubt. Skepticism, History and Politics in Cicero’s Academica. Leiden; Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, A. 1992. “How Not to Read a Poem: Unmixing Simonides from Protagoras.” CP 87.2: 110–130.Google Scholar
Casali, S. 2018. “Caesar’s Poetry in its Context.” In Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 206–214.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2004. “The Roman Satirist Speaks Greek.” Classics Ireland 11: 1–46.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2010. “Verbal Mosaics: Speech Patterns and Generic Stylization.” In Breed, B. W., Keitel, E., Wallace, R. (eds.), Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 132–161.Google Scholar
Charpin, F. 1978–1991. Lucilius Satires. 3 vols. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. 2000. Plautus’ Amphitryo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christes, J. and Garbugino, G. 2015. Satiren: lateinisch und deutsch. Darmstadt: WBG (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Coffey, M. 1976. Roman Satire. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Collins, R. 1998. The Sociologies of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Colonna, H. 1590 (F. Hesselio reprint, 1707). Q. Ennii poetae vetustissimi quae supersunt fragmenta. Amsterdam: Wetstein.Google Scholar
Comotti, G. 1991. Music in Greek and Roman Culture. Translated by R. V. Munson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 2001. “Cicero on the Origins of Rome.” In Powell, J. G. F. and North, J. A. (eds.), Cicero’s Republic (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supp. 76). London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London. 41–56.Google Scholar
Corpet, E. F. 1845. Satires de C. Lucilius. Paris: Panckoucke.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 2003. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. 1990. “Cicero’s Strategy of Embarrassment in the Speech for Plancius.” AJP 111: 75–81.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. 1994. M. Tullius Cicero. The Fragmentary Speeches: an Edition with Commentary. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 1996. Writing, Teachers, and Students in Greco-Roman Egypt. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2004. “The Politics of the New Music.” In Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of ‘Mousike’ in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 207–248.Google Scholar
Čulík-Baird, H. 2018. “Stoicism in the Stars: Cicero’s Aratea in the De Natura Deorum,” Latomus 77: 646–670.Google Scholar
Čulík-Baird, H. 2019. “Staging Roman Slavery in the 2nd Century BCE.” Ramus 48.2: 174–197.Google Scholar
Čulík-Baird, H. 2020. “Archias the Good Immigrant.” Rhetorica 38.4: 382–410.Google Scholar
Čulík-Baird, H. 2021. “Fragments of ‘Anonymous’ Latin Verse in Cicero.” In Kayachev, B. (ed.), Poems Without Poets: Approaches to Anonymous Ancient Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge Classical Journal Supplement 43. 105–119.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. 1967. M. Pacuvi Fragmenta. Rome: Aedibus Athenaei.Google Scholar
D’Antò, A. 1980. Accius: I frammenti delle tragedie. Lecce: Milella.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. 1932. Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie. Berlin; Zürich: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Damen, M. 1990. “Electra’s Monody and the Role of the Chorus in Euripides’ Orestes 960–1012.” TAPA 120: 133–45.Google Scholar
Dangel, J. 2001. “Varron et les citations poetiques dans le De Lingua Latina.” In Calboli, (ed.), Papers on Grammar 6: 97–122. Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar
Dangel, J. 2002. Accius. Oeuvres, Fragments. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
De Graff, T. B. 1940. “Plato in Cicero.” CP 35.2: 143–153.Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1970. Varrone: il terzo gran lume romano. Florence. La nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Delrius, M. A. 1593. Syntagma Tragoediae Latinae. Antwerp: Moretus.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. 2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. 2016. Learning Latin the Ancient Way: Latin Textbooks from the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. 1911 (6th edition: 1967). Poetarum romanorum veterum reliquiae. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. 1936/1942. Anthologia Lyrica Graeca. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, A. C. 1997. “On Fragments in Classical Scholarship.” In Most, G. W. (ed.), Collecting Fragments – Fragmente Sammeln. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1–33.Google Scholar
Dix, T. K. 2004. “Aristotle’s Peripatetic Library.” In Raven, J. (ed.), Lost Libraries: The Destruction of Great Book Collections Since Antiquity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dix, T. K. 2013. “‘Beware of Promising Your Library to Anyone’: Assembling a Private Library at Rome.” In König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K., Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 209–236.Google Scholar
Dougan, T. W. 1905–1907. M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum disputationum libri quinque. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dousa, F. 1597. Satyrarum quae supersunt reliquiae. Lugdunum Batavorum: Franciscus Raphelengius.Google Scholar
DuBois, P. 1995. Sappho is Burning. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dué, C. 2006. The Captive Woman’s Lament in Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. 2001. “Appius’ Indignation: Gossip, Tradition, and Performance in Republican Rome.” TAPA 131: 119–142.Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. 2007. The Ghosts of the Past: Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2012. “Scriptum and Voluntas in Cicero’s Brutus.” In Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e civitas: transizioni dalla repubblica all’impero, in ricordo di Emanuele Narducci. Pisa: Edizioni ETS. 117–128.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2013. “Cicero and the Politics of Ambiguity: Interpreting the Pro Marcello.” In Steel, C., van der Blom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, A. 2006. Performance and Identity in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durante, G. de. 1966. Le fabulae praetextae. Rome: Fratelli Palombi.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D. M. 2008. Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 2003. Cicero: De Natura Deorum. Liber I. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 2008. Cicero: Catilinarians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 2010. Cicero. Pro Sexto Roscio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. 2013. Cicero: Pro Marco Caelio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. W. 1971. “Quotation and Originality.” In Ferguson, A. R., Spiller, R. E. (eds.), The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, VIII: Letters and Social Aims. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 93–107.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. 1916 (4th edition: 1973). Recueil de textes latins archaïques. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Estienne, H. 1564. Fragmenta Poetarum Veterum Latinorum. Geneva: H Stephanus.Google Scholar
Ewbank, W. W. 1933. The Poems of Cicero. New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1984. “Roman Experience of Menander in the Late Republic and Early Empire.” TAPA 114, 299–309.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2002. “Orator and/et actor.” In Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.), Greek and Roman Actors. Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 362–376.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2004. Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2016. Beyond Greek. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. 2014. “The Reception of Plautus in Antiquity.” In Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 767–81.Google Scholar
Flores, E. (ed.) 2000–2009. Quinto Ennio. Annali. Naples: Liguori.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fornara, C. W. 1983. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 2007. Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 2007. Plautine Elements in Plautus. Translated by T. Drevikovsky and F. Muecke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 2003. “Images of Ashurbanipal in Later Tradition.” Eretz Israel 27: 37–48.Google Scholar
Frampton, S. A. 2016. “What to Do with Books in the De Finibus.” TAPA 146.1:117–147.Google Scholar
Frampton, S. A. 2019. Empire of Letters. Writing in Roman Literature and Thought from Lucretius to Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franchella, Q. 1968. Lucii Accii tragoediarum fragmenta. Bologna: Compositori.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W. 1985. The Rise of the Roman Jurists. Studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. 2001. “Lucilius und die Freundschaft.” In Manuwald, G. (ed.), Der Satiriker Lucilius und Seine Zeit. Munich: Zetemata. 90–110Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2000. Ovid, Aratus and Augustus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2001. “Cicero’s Astronomy.” CQ 51. 2: 520–36.Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2013a “Cicero’s Poetry.” In Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 88–106.Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2013b. Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geffcken, K. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gellar-Goad, T. H. M. 2018. “Lucretius’ Personified Natura Rerum, Satire, and Ennius’ Saturae.” Phoenix 71.1/2: 143–160.Google Scholar
Gerlach, F. D. 1846. C. Lucili Saturarum Reliquiae. Zurich: Meyer et Zeller.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. 1959. “Cicero und Aristoteles.” Hermes 87: 143–62Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2007. “Greek Auxiliaries: Tragedy and Philosophy in Ciceronian Invective.” In Booth, J. (ed.) Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 149–182.Google Scholar
Goh, I. 2016. “Of Cabbages and Kin: Traces of Lucilius in the First Half of Horace’s Epodes.” In Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds.), Horace’s Epodes: Contexts, Intertexts, and Reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 63–83.Google Scholar
Goh, I. 2018. “Scepticism at the Birth of Satire: Carneades in Lucilius’ Concilium Deorum.” CQ 68.1: 128–142.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1989. “Poetry, Politics, and Ennius.” TAPA 119: 247–261.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1995. Epic in Republican Rome. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1996. “The Fall and Rise of Roman Tragedy.” TAPA 126: 265–286.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2013. Terence: Hecyra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. and Manuwald, G.. 2018. Fragmentary Republican Latin, Vol. I: Ennius, Testimonia. Epic Fragments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. and Manuwald, G.. 2018. Fragmentary Republican Latin, Vol. II: Ennius, Dramatic Fragments. Minor Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. 2012. “Absent Presence: pater Ennius in Renaissance Europe.” Classical Receptions Journal 4.1: 1–19.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. 2013. Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graver, M. 2002. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. 1984. “Sénèque juge de Cicéron.” MEFRA 96.2: 655–70.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. 1980. “P. Köln III 131 adespotum: Euripides, Orestes 134–142.” ZPE 39: 35–6.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1968. Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 BC. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden; New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Guastella, G. 2017. Word of Mouth. Fama and its Personifications in Art and Literature from Ancient Rome to the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, H. U. 2003. The Powers of Philology. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. 2012. Work in Progress: Literary Revision as Social Performance in Ancient Rome. Oxford; New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. 1998. Poetic Garlands. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. 2005. The World of Roman Song. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. 2002. “The Singing Actors of Antiquity.” In Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–38.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2000. “The Subjection of Mythos to Logos: Plato’s Citations of the Poets.” CQ 50: 94–112.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2012. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. G. L. 1966. “The Opening Campaigns and the Battle of the Aoi Stena in the Second Macedonian War.” JRS 56: 39–54.Google Scholar
Hanses, M. 2020. The Life of Comedy after the Death of Plautus and Terence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Harries, B. 2007. “Acting the Part: Techniques of the Comic Stage in Cicero’s Early Speeches.” In Booth, J. (ed.) Cicero on the attack: invective and subversion in the orations and beyond. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. 129–147.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1990. “Cicero’s de Temporibus Suis. The Evidence Reconsidered.” Hermes 118: 455–463.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2004a. Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2004b. “Terence’s Selbstaussöhnung: Payback Time for the Self (Hautontimorumenus).” Ramus 33.1–2: 53–81.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2016. “Cicero’s Letters to Cicero, ad QFr: Big Brothers Keepers.” Arethusa 49.3: 439–461.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dyamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Højte, J. M. (ed.) 2002. Images of Ancestors. Aarhus, Oxford, and Oakville, CT: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. 1998. “A Tragic Fragment in Cicero, Pro Caelio 67?” CQ 48: 561–564.Google Scholar
Hollywood, A. 2002. “Performativity, Citationality, Ritualization.” History of Religions 42.2: 93–115.Google Scholar
Hostis, A. 1874. Scritti Inediti di Francesco Petrarca. Trieste: Tipografia del Lloyd Austro-Ungarico.Google Scholar
Houston, G. W. 2013. “The non-Philodemus book collection in the Villa of the Papyri.” In König, J., Oikonomoupoulou, K., Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 183–208.Google Scholar
Houston, K. 2013. Shady Characters: the Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and Other Typographical Marks. New York; London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Howley, J. A. 2018. Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huby, P. M. 1989. “Cicero’s Topics and its Peripatetic Sources.” In Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds.) Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. London: Routledge. 61–76.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. J. 1998. “Invective and Comedic Allusion: Cicero, In Pisonem, Fragment 9 (Nisbet).” Latomus 57: 570–577.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 1998. Cicero’s Correspondence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R.. 2017. Aristotle. Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy. www.protrepticus.infoGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1995. “Reconstructing Philodemus’ On Poems.” In Obbink, D. (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. 69–96.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1969a. The Tragedies of Ennius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1969b. “The Fragments of Ennius’ Scenic Scripts.” L’Antiquité Classique, T. 38, Fasc. 1. 181–217.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1973a. “Greek Poetry in Cicero’s Prose Writing.” YCS 23: 61–111.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1973b. “Homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto (Terence, Heauton timoumenos 77).” Antichthon 7: 14–46.Google Scholar
Jones, D. M. 1959. “Cicero as a Translator.” BICS 6: 22–34.Google Scholar
Kaibel, G. 1899. Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Berlin: Weidman.Google Scholar
Karamanou, I. 2017. Euripides’ Alexandros: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 1995. Suetonius: De grammaticis et rhetoribus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2006. Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World 300 BC–AD 300. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. 2002. “Cicero’s Oratorical and Rhetorical Legacy.” In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Leiden: Brill. 481–501.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. 1953. Scaenicorum Romanorum Fragmenta. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Knapp, C. 1911. “Vahlen’s Ennius.” AJP 32.1: 1–35.Google Scholar
Knox, P. 2011. “Cicero as a Hellenistic Poet.” CQ 61: 192–204.Google Scholar
Kock, T. 1880–1888. Comicorum Atticorum Fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2011. “Excerpting as a Reading Practice.” In Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.), Thinking through Excerpts: Studies on Stobaeus. Turnhout: Brepolis. 9–22.Google Scholar
Krenkel, W. 1970. Lucilius, Satiren. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. 2009. Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. 2000. “Beyond (Dis)belief: Rhetorical Form and Religious Symbol in Cicero’s de Divinatione.” TAPA 130: 353–391.Google Scholar
Kubiak, D. P. 1989. “Piso’s Madness,” AJP 110: 237–45.Google Scholar
Lachmann, C. 1876. C. Lucili Saturarum Reliquiae. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Landels, J. G. 1999. Music in Ancient Greece and Rome. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. 1997. Varron: Théologien et philosophe romain. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2004. “The Pro Caelio and Comedy.” CP 99.4: 300–335.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. 1986. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1904. The Ancient Editions of Plautus. Oxford: J. Parker and Co.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1990. “Electoral Bribery in the Roman Republic.” JRS 80: 1–16.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 2008. Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1992. “Stoic Readers of Homer.” In Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 41–66.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2005. “Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus, and Augustine’s De dialectica.” In Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Language and Learning. Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 36–55.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2006. From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Clarendon Press: Oxford. 285–306.Google Scholar
Long, A. A, and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. 1943. Cicerone e la poesia. Pavia: Annali della Facoltà di lettere e di filosofia della Università di Cagliari.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. 2012. Terence: Phormio. Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Aris & Phillips Classical Texts.Google Scholar
Mankin, D. 2011. Cicero: De Oratore Book III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2011. Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marinone, N. 1997. Cronologia Ciceroniana. Rome: Centro di Studi Ciceroniani.Google Scholar
Marlowe, E. 2013. Shaky Ground: Context, Connoisseurship and the History of Roman Art. London, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. I. 1964. A History of Education in Antiquity. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, J. 1988. Trials of Character. The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
May, J. M and Wisse, J., 2001. Cicero. On the Ideal Orator. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, J. M. 2002. “Ciceronian Oratory in Context.” In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden: Brill. 49–70.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. B. 1883. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum Libri Tres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McElduff, S. 2013. Roman Theories of Translation: Surpassing the Source. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNamee, K. 2007. Annotations in Greek and Latin Texts from Egypt. New Haven: American Society of Papyrologists. Vol. 45.Google Scholar
Merula, P. 1595. Q. Enni, poetae cum primis censendi, annalium libb. XIIX : quae apud varios Auctores superant, fragmenta. Leiden: Joannis Paetsij & Ludovici Elzeverij.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2014. Graffiti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monda, S. 1998. “Le citazioni di Cecilio Stazio nella Pro Caelio di Cicerone.” Giornale italiano di filologia 50: 23–39.Google Scholar
Monda, S. 2004. Titus Maccius Plautus. Vidularia et deperditarum fabularum fragmenta. Sarsina: QuattroVenti.Google Scholar
Monda, S. 2015. “Terence Quotations in Latin Grammarians: Shared and Distinguishing Features.” In Turner, A. and Torello-Hill, G. (eds.), Terence between Late Antiquity and the Age of Printing: Illustration, Commentary and Performance. Leiden: Brill. 105–137.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 1998. The Theatre of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. 2012. Music in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morel, W. 1927. Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum praeter Ennium et Lucilium, post Aemilium Baehrens iterum. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Müller, L. 1872. C. Lucili Saturarum Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Murray, G. 1897. A History of Ancient Greek Literature. London: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 1981. “Cicerone, Crasso e un verso di Ennio. Nota a Pro Caelio 18.” Maia 33: 145–146.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. 2021. Ennius Noster. Lucretius and the Annales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neubecker, A. J. 1986. Philodemus. Über Die Musik IV. Buch. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
North, H. 1952. “The Use of Poetry in the Training of the Ancient Orator.” Traditio 8: 1–33.Google Scholar
Nosarti, L. 1993. “Medo, Medea, e il ‘doctus’ Pacuvio.” In Aricò, G. (ed.), Atti del V seminario di studi sulla tragedia romana. Palermo: Università degli Studi di Palermo. 21–43.Google Scholar
Nosarti, L. 1999. Filologia in frammenti. Contributi esegetici e testuali ai frammenti dei poeti latini. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Otto, A. 1890 (Reprint: 1971). Die Sprichwörter und Sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Hildesheim, New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2017. “Slave Religiosity in the Roman Middle Republic.” Classical Antiquity 36.2: 317–369.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 1883. “Emendations.” Hermathena 4.9: 446–452.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius: The Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press.Google Scholar
Pedroli, L. 1953. Fabularum Praetextarum Quae Extant. Genova: Universita di Genova.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1949–1953. Callimachus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Piras, G. 1998. Varrone e i poetica verba: studio sul settimo libro del De lingua latina. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Piras, G. 2015. “Cum poeticis multis verbis magis delecter quam utar: Poetic Citations and Etymological Enquiry in Varro’s De Lingua Latina.” In Butterfield, D. J. (ed.), Varro Varius: The Polymath of the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society. 51–72.Google Scholar
Pocetti, P. 2018. “Another Image of Literary Latin,” in Breed, B. W, Keitel, E., Wallace, R. (eds.) Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome, pp81–131.Google Scholar
Pociña, A. 1984. El tragediógrafo latino Lucio Acio. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 1960. Griechische Musikfragmente. Nuremberg: H. Carl.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. 1970. Denkmäler Altgriechischer Musik. Nuremberg: H. Carl.Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E. and West, M. L. 2001. Documents of Ancient Greek Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Polt, C. 2021. Catullus and Roman Comedy. Theatricality and Personal Drama in the Late Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poncelet, R. 1957. Cicéron, traducteur de Platon; l’expression de la pensée complexe en latin classique. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J. (eds.). 2004. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 1988. Cicero: Cato Maior De Senectute. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 1995. Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. 2006. Singing Alexandria. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. 1953. Cicéron et L’Histoire Romaine. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Raschke, W. 1987. “Arma pro amico. Lucilian Satire at the Crisis of the Roman Republic.” Hermes 115.3: 299–318.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1972. “Cicero the Historian and Cicero the Antiquarian.” JRS 62: 33–45.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the late Roman Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1991. Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. 1996. “Classical Scholarship.” In Kraye, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 20–46.Google Scholar
Regali, M. 2015. “Amicus Homerus: Allusive Art in Plato’s Incipit to Book X of the Republic (595a–c).” In Cornelli, G. (ed.), Plato’s Styles and Characters: Between Literature and Philosophy. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. 173–186.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., Marshall, P. K., and Mynors, R. A. B. (eds.). 1983. Texts and Transmission: a Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. 1 1852/ 2 1871/ 3 1897. Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta: Vol. I. Tragicorum Romanorum fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. 1 1855/ 2 1873/ 3 1898. Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta: Vol. II. Comicorum Romanorum praeter Plautum et Terentium fragmenta. Leipzig:Teubner.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. 1875. Die römische Tragödie im Zeitalter der Republik. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1992. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2017. Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. 1999. Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. 2017. “Assyria in Classical Sources.” In Frahm, E. (ed.), A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 570–582.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1997. “Ovid’s Heroides and Tristia: Voices from Exile.” Ramus 26.1: 29–56.Google Scholar
Rouse, R. H. and Rouse, M. A.. 1979. Preachers, Florilegia and Sermons: Studies on the Manipulus Florum of Thomas of Ireland. (Studies and Texts, number 47.) Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1997. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. 1982. “Cicero, the Megalenses and the Defense of Caelius.” AJP 103: 199–304.Google Scholar
Schierl, P. 2006. Die Tragödien des Pacuvius: ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten mit Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. 2011. Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Latin Prose. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Scriverius, P. 1620. Collectanea veterum tragicorum fragmenta cum notis G. I. Vossii. Leiden: J Maire.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965–70. Cicero’s Letters to Atticus. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 3–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1977. Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 16–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1983. “Cicero and Early Latin Poetry.” ICS 8.2: 239–249.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1995. Onomasticon to Cicero’s Letters. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1996. Onomasticon to Cicero’s Treatises. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. 2011. Clodia Metelli: The Tribune’s Sister. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1968. Studia Enniana. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 1983. “Mosaics.” In Henig, M. (ed.), A Handbook of Roman Art. London: Phaidon Press. 116–138.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1953. Pindari Carmina cum Fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Soubiran, J. 1972. Aratea: fragments poétiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Spahlinger, L. 2005. Tulliana Simplicitas. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Spaltenstein, F. 2008. Commentaire des fragments dramatiques de Livius Andronicus. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2011. “Movement and the Linguistic Turn: Reading Varro’s De Lingua Latina.” In Laurence, R. and Newsome, D. K. (eds.), Rome, Ostia, Pompeii. Movement and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 57–80.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2015. “Varro’s Romespeak: De lingua Latina.” In Butterfield, D. J. (ed.), Varro Varius. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society. 73–92.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2019. Language and Authority in De Lingua Latina: Varro’s Guide to Being Roman. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Studies in Classics.Google Scholar
Stark, R. 1957. “Sapphoreminiszenzen.” Hermes 85: 325–326.Google Scholar
Starr, R. J. 1991. “Reading Aloud: Lectores and Roman Reading.” CJ. 86.4: 337–43.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2001. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2002. “Cicero’s Brutus: the End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?” BICS 46: 195–211.Google Scholar
Steele, R. B. 1900. “The Greek in Cicero’s Epistles.” AJP 21.4: 387–410.Google Scholar
Stein, P. 1978. “The Place of Servius Sulpicius Rufus in the Development of Roman Legal Science.” In Behrends, O., Disselhorst, M., Lange, H., Liebs, D., Wolff, G., and Wollschläger, C. (eds.), Festschrift für Franz Wieacker zum 70. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. 175–184.Google Scholar
Stem, R. 2006. “Cicero as Orator and Philosopher: The Value of the Pro Murena for Ciceronian Political Thought.” The Review of Politics 68.2: 206–231.Google Scholar
Steuart, E. M. “The Earliest Narrative Poetry of Rome.” CQ 15.1: 31–37.Google Scholar
Stroup, C. S. 2010. Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung aelterer roemischer Dichter : Livius Andronicus Naevius, Ennius. Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. 1973. The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1961. “Who Was Vedius Pollio?” JRS 51: 23–30.Google Scholar
Terzaghi, N. 1934 (2nd edition: 1966). Lucilio. Turin: L’Erma.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. M. 1987. William of Malmesbury. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. 1949. “Note a Livio Andronico, Ennio, Varrone, Virgilio.” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 18: 186–204.Google Scholar
Traglia, A. 1962. Cicerone, I frammenti poetici. Milan: A. Mondadori.Google Scholar
Traglia, A. 1986. Poeti latini arcaici. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1969. Roman Freedmen During the Late Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tronzo, W. (ed.) 2009. The Fragment: An Incomplete History. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Uden, J. 2006. “Embracing the Young Man in Love: Catullus 75 and the Comic adulescens.” Antichthon 40: 19–34.Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. 1854. Ennianae Poesis Reliquiae, recensuit. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. 1903. Ennianae Poesis Reliquiae, iteratis curis recensuit. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Vanderbroeck, P. J. J. 1987. Popular Leadership and Collective Behaviour in the late Roman Republic (80–50 BC). Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1985. “The Masks of Rhetoric: Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino.” Rhetorica 3: 1–20.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1996. Representations. Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 2002. “Cicero’s Early Speeches.” In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Leiden: Brill. 71–111.Google Scholar
Vaughn, J. W. 1985. “Law and Rhetoric in the Causa Curiana.” CA 4: 208–222.Google Scholar
Victor, B. 2013. “History of the Text and the Scholia.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 343–362.Google Scholar
Victor, B. 2014. “The Transmission of Terence.” In Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 699–716.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2013. “The Genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo.” In Franoulidis, S. A., Harrison, S. J., Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.), Generic interfaces in Latin literature: encounters, interactions, and transformations. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1955. “Tragic History: a Reconsideration.” BICS 2: 4–14.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. 2015. Reconstructing Damon: Music, Wisdom Teaching, and Politics in Perikles’ Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, J. O. 2015. “What the Middle Ages Missed of Cicero.” In Altman, W. H. F. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. 2011. “Accius, Porcius Licinus, and the Beginning of Latin Literature.” JRS 101: 31–50.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1992. Ancient Greek Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. 1934/1974. Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
White, H. 1990. The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, P. 2010. Cicero in Letters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wille, G. 1967. Musica Romana. Amsterdam: P. Schippers.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974. Cinna the Poet, and other Roman essays. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1985. Catullus and his World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1999. Historiography and Imagination. Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2002. “History, Poetry, and Annales.” In Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden: Brill. 331–362.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. Portland, OR: Areopagitica Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. 1929 (1989). A Room of One’s Own. San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. 2011. Hermogenes’ ‘On Types of Style.’ Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wright, F. W. 1931. Cicero and the Theater. Northampton, MA: Smith College Classical Studies. No. 11.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 1992. “Petitio and Largitio: Popular Participation in the Centuriate Assembly of the Late Republic.” JRS 82: 32–52.Google Scholar
Young, E. M. 2015. Translation as Muse. Poetic Translation in Catullus’ Rome. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1972. “Cicero and the Scipionic Circle.” HSCP 76: 173–179.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1995. Cicero, De Republica. Selections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2007. “The Influence of Cicero on Ennius.” In Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E., (eds.), Ennius Perennis: the Annals and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society. 1–16.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2018. Critics, Compilers, and Commentators. An introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE – 800 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zillinger, W. 1911. Cicero Und Die Altrömischen Dichter. Würzberg: Staudenraus.Google Scholar
Zinn, E. 1959. “Fragment über Fragmente.” In Schmoll gen. Eisenwerth, J. A. (ed.), Das Unvollendete als künstlerische Form. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Ziolokowski, J. 2000. “Nota bene: why the classics were neumed in the Middle Ages.” The Journal of Medieval Latin 10: 74–114.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. 1962. Cicero Platonis Aemulus. Zurich: Juris.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Hannah Čulík-Baird, Boston University
  • Book: Cicero and the Early Latin Poets
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031820.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Hannah Čulík-Baird, Boston University
  • Book: Cicero and the Early Latin Poets
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031820.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Hannah Čulík-Baird, Boston University
  • Book: Cicero and the Early Latin Poets
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031820.012
Available formats
×