Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-g549k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-15T00:02:38.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Perfusion and diffusion imaging in chronic carotid disease

from Section 2 - Cerebrovascular disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

By
Iain D. Wilkinson
Edited by
Jonathan H. Gillard ,
Adam D. Waldman  and
Peter B. Barker
Jonathan H. Gillard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Adam D. Waldman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Peter B. Barker
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Diseases affecting the arterial supply to and distribution within the brain often interfere with central nervous system (CNS) metabolism. Such interference, which frequently results from internal carotid artery (ICA) pathology, can lead to the onset of clinical symptoms, signaling the need for investigation of the brain via an appropriate imaging modality. Imaging has historically been used to exclude the presence of pathology such as hemorrhage, neoplasm, or infection and latterly to investigate hemodynamic cause and status. The nature of metabolic change and the onset of associated symptoms can be broadly classified as being either acute or chronic. In the acute case (“brain attack”), an abrupt alteration in brain function resulting from changes in vascular supply, which are non-transient, is termed stroke. The ability of a healthcare system to respond quickly and effectively to the presentation of acute stroke may well depend heavily on the provision of imaging technology: the applications of diffusion and perfusion MR imaging (MRI) in this context are detailed elsewhere (Ch. 15). This chapter will concentrate on the utility of perfusion and diffusion in the context of chronic ICA disease. The majority of carotid disease is atherosclerotic, and so emphasis will be placed on this pathology.

Alterations to the brain’s vascular supply, hemodynamic failure, and the search for clinically relevant physiological indicators

Patients with chronic cerebrovascular blood supply deficits often present with a history of symptoms such as those associated with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), amaurosis fugax, or having experienced an episode of minor or non-disabling stroke. Sometimes they have experienced more than one such ischemic event. They may be at high risk of having a significant disabling stroke and although previous symptoms may have had sudden onset, for the purposes of this chapter, their speedy resolution classifies their overall disease state as being chronic. In the clinical setting, the overall aim of imaging in this patient group is to aid the prevention of recurrent ischemia, thereby reducing the risk of disabling stroke.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical MR Neuroimaging
Physiological and Functional Techniques
 , pp. 258 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Powers, WJ.Cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Ann Neurol 1991; 29: 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamauchi, H, Fukuyama, H, Nagahama, Y, Katsumi, Y, Okazawa, H.Cerebral hematocrit decreases with hemodynamic compromise in carotid artery occlusion: a PET study. Stroke 1998; 29: 98–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperling, B, Lassen, NA.Hyperfixation of HMPAO in subacute ischemic stroke leading to spuriously high estimates of cerebral blood flow by SPECT. Stroke 1993; 24: 193–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warach, S, Gaa, J, Siewert, B, Wielopolski, P, Edelman, RR.Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 231–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdette, JH, Ricci, PE, Petitti, N, Elster, AD. Cerebral infarction: time course of signal intensity changes on diffusion-weighted MR images. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 791–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandya, H, Wilkinson, ID, Griffiths, PD.Sequential dynamic gadolinium MR perfusion weighted imaging: effects on transit time and cerebral blood volume measurements. in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the British Society of Neuroradiologists, Amsterdam, 2003.Google Scholar
Nighoghossian, N, Berthezene, Y, Meyer, R, et al. Assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Neurol Sci 1997; 149: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bihan, D, Breton, E, Lallemand, D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986; 161: 401–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merboldt, KD, Hanicke, W, Bruhn, H, Gyngell, ML, Frahm, J.Diffusion imaging of the human brain in vivo using high-speed STEAM MRI. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23: 179–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordidge, RJ, Helpern, JA, Qing, ZX, Knight, RA, Nagesh, V.Correction of motional artifacts in diffusion-weighted MR images using navigator echoes. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12: 455–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, LR, Hennerici, M.Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol 1998; 55: 1475–1482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäger, HR, Saunders, D, Murray, A.Cranial and intracranial pathology (2): cerebrovascular disease and non-traumatic intracranial haemorrhage. In Diagnostic Radiology: A Textbook of Medical Imaging, 4th edn eds. Grainger, RS, Allison, DJ, Adam, A, Dixon, AK. London: Harcourt, 2001, p. 625.Google Scholar
Liebeskind, DSCollateral circulation. Stroke 2003; 34: 2279–2284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartkamp, MJ, van der Grond, J, van Everdingen, KJ, Hillen, B, Mali, WP.Circle of Willis collateral flow investigated by magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke 1999; 30: 2671–2678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmeijer, J, Klijn, CJ, Kappelle, LJ, van Huffelen, AC, van Gijn, J.Collateral circulation via the ophthalmic artery or leptomeningeal vessels is associated with impaired cerebral vasoreactivity in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002; 14: 22–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermier, M, Ibrahim, AS, Wiart, M, et al. The delayed perfusion sign at MRI. J Neuroradiol 2003; 30: 172–179.Google ScholarPubMed
Teng, MM, Cheng, HC, Kao, YH, et al. MR perfusion studies of brain for patients with unilateral carotid stenosis or occlusion: evaluation of maps of “time to peak” and “percentage of baseline at peak.”J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasel, C, Azizi, A, Wilfort, A, Mallek, R, Schindler, E.Measurement of time-to-peak parameter by use of a new standardization method in patients with stenotic or occlusive disease of the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1056–1061.Google ScholarPubMed
Kajimoto, K, Moriwaki, H, Yamada, N, et al. Cerebral hemodynamic evaluation using perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography values in chronic occlusive carotid disease. Stroke 2003; 34: 1662–1666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, PD, Hoggard, N, Dannells, W, Wilkinson, ID. In vivo measurement of cerebral blood flow: a review of methods and applications. Vasc Med 2001; 6: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nighoghossian, N, Berthezene, Y, Phillippon, B, et al. Hemodynamic parameter assessment with dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in unilateral symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 1996; 27: 474–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, M, Yuh, WT, Ueda, T, et al. Severe occlusive carotid artery disease: hemodynamic assessment by MR perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 43–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillard, JH, Hardingham, CR, Antoun, NM, Freer, CE, Kirkpatrick, PJ.Evaluation of carotid endarterectomy with sequential MR perfusion imaging: a preliminary 12-month follow up. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 798–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, ID, Griffiths, PD, Hoggard, N, et al. Short-term changes in cerebral micro-hemodynamics following carotid stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1501–1507.Google Scholar
Bozzao, A, Floris, R, Gaudiello, F, et al. Hemodynamic modifications in patients with symptomatic unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery: evaluation with MR imaging perfusion sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1342–1345.Google ScholarPubMed
Doerfler, A, Eckstein, HH, Eichbaum, M, et al. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carotid artery disease before and after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 587–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effects of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. N Eng J Med 1991; 325: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lythgoe, DJ, Østergaard, L, William, SC, et al. Quantitative perfusion imaging in carotid artery stenosis using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluytmans, M, van der Grond, J, Eikelboom, BC, Viergever, MA.Long-term hemodynamic effects of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1998; 29: 1567–1572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonas, H, Smith, HA, Durham, SR, Pentheny, SL, Johnson, DW.Increased stroke risk predicted by compromised cerebral blood flow reactivity. J Neurosurg 1993; 79: 483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markus, H, Cullinane, M.Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion. Brain 2001; 124: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvestrini, M, Vernieri, F, Pasqualetti, P, et al. Impaired cerebral vasoreactivity and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 2000; 283: 2122–2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guckel, FJ, Brix, G, Schmiedek, P, et al. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease: assessment with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging and the acetazolamide stimulation test. Radiology 1996; 201: 405–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Detre, JA, Samuels, OB, Alsop, DC, et al. Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral blood flow with acetazolamide challenge in patients with cerebrovascular stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 870–875.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, PD, Salam, S, Gaines, P, et al. Assessment of cerebral haemodynamics and vascular reserve in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion: an integrated MR method. In Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the British Society of Neuroradiologists, Amsterdam, 2003.Google Scholar
Lovblad, KO, Laubach, HJ, Baird, AE, et al. Clinical experience with diffusion-weighted MR in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 1061–1066.Google ScholarPubMed
Lefkowitz, D, LaBenz, M, Nudo, SR, Steg, RE, Bertoni, JM.Hyperacute ischemic stroke missed by diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1871–1875.Google ScholarPubMed
Fiehler, J, Foth, M, Kucinski, T, et al. Severe ADC decreases do not predict irreversible tissue damage in humans. Stroke 2002; 33: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabo, K, Kern, R, Gass, A, Hirsch, J, Hennerici, M.Acute stroke patterns in patients with internal carotid artery disease: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2001; 32: 1323–1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, UG, Briley, D, Meagher, T, Molyneux, A, Rothwell, PM.Abnormalities on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging performed several weeks after a minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 734–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kastrup, A, Schulz, JB, Mader, I, Dichgans, J, Kuker, W.Diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery disease. J Neurol 2002; 249: 1168–1174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Carotid Surgery Trials Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351: 1379–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): a randomized study. Lancet 2001; 357: 1729–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, JS, Roubin, GS, Iyer, S, et al. Elective stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries. Circulation 1997; 95: 376–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillard, JH, Hardingham, CR, Kirkpatrick, PJ, et al. Evaluation of carotid endarterectomy with sequential MR perfusion imaging: a preliminary report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 1747–1752.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, ID, Beard, JD, Hoggard, N, Griffiths, PD, Venables, GS.Short-term haemodynamic consequences of carotid endarterectomy. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance of Medicine, Glasgow, 2001, p. 1440.Google Scholar
Soinne, L, Helenius, J, Tatlisumak, T, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2003; 34: 1655–1661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, S, Wilkinson, ID, Gaines, PA, et al. Changes in cerebral hemodynamics following carotid stenting by magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging. In Proceedings of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Lucerne, 2002.Google Scholar
du Mesnil de Rochemont, R et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions after filter-protected stenting of high-grade symptomatic carotid artery stenoses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1321–1325.Google ScholarPubMed
Powers, AD, Smith, RR.Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy: a transcranial doppler evaluation. Neurosurgery 1990; 26: 56–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, RB.Hyperperfusion encephalopathies: hypertensive encephalopathy and related conditions. Neurology 2002; 8: 22–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, ID, Griffiths, PD, Hoggard, N, et al. Unilateral leptomeningeal enhancement after carotid stent insertion detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2000; 31: 848–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiart, M, Berthezene, Y, Adeleine, P, et al. Vasodilatory response of border zones to acetazolamide before and after endarterectomy: an echo planar imaging-dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI study in patients with high-grade unilateral internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 2000; 31: 1561–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, HJ, Mathias, KD, Drescher, R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1251–1259.Google Scholar
Schnaudigel, S, Gröschel, K, Pilgram, SM, Kastrup, A. New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2008; 39: 1911–1919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, KP, Shill, HA, Britt, PM, et al. Assessment of silent embolism from carotid endarterectomy by use of diffusion-weighted imaging: work in progress. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 650–653.Google ScholarPubMed
Barth, A, Remonda, L, Lovblad, KO, Schroth, G, Seiler, RW.Silent cerebral ischemia detected by diffusion-weighted MRI after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2000; 31: 1824–1828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feiwell, RJ, Besmertis, L, Sarkar, R, Saloner, DA, Rapp, JH.Detection of clinically silent infarcts after carotid endarterectomy by use of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 646–649.Google ScholarPubMed
Tomczak, R, Wunderlich, A, Liewald, F, Stuber, G, Gorich, J.Diffusion-weighted MRI: detection of cerebral ischemia before and after carotid thromboendarterectomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 247–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, M, Reiche, W, Langenscheidt, P, Hassfeld, J, Hagen, T.Ischemia after carotid endarterectomy: comparison between transcranial Doppler sonography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 47–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, S, Gaines, PA.Current concepts of mechanical cerebral protection during precutaneous carotid intervention. Vasc Med 2003; 8: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, S, McKevitt, F, Venables, GS, Cleveland, TJ, Gaines, PA.Neurological outcomes after carotid stenting protected with the NeuroShield filter compared to unprotected stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 777–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terada, T, Tsuura, M, Matsumoto, H, et al. Results of endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenoses with a newly developed balloon protection catheter. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 617–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schluter, M, Tubler, T, Steffens, JC, Mathey, DG, Schofer, J.Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1007–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Restrepo, L, Wityk, RJ, Grega, MA, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke 2002; 33: 2909–2915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wityk, RJ, Goldsborough, MA, Hillis, A, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with neurologic complications after cardiac surgery. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 571–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wityk, RJ, Hillis, A, Beauchamp, N, Barker, PB, Rigamonti, D.Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in adult moyamoya syndrome: characteristic patterns and change after surgical intervention: case report. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 1499–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SK, Kim, DI, Jeong, EK, et al. Postoperative evaluation of moyamoya disease with perfusion-weighted MR imaging: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 741–747.Google Scholar
El-Koussy, M, Lovblad, KO, Steinlin, M, Kiefer, C, Schroth, G.Perfusion MRI abnormalities in the absence of diffusion changes in a case of moyamoya-like syndrome in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 938–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantu, C, Pineda, C, Barinagarrementeria, F, et al. Noninvasive cerebrovascular assessment of Takayasu arteritis. Stroke 2000; 31: 2197–2202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, M, Corr, P, Robbs, J.Cerebrovascular findings in Takayasu disease. J Neuroimaging 2000; 10: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kissin, EY, Merkel, PA.Diagnostic imaging in Takayasu arteritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004; 16: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, GS, Hallahan, CW, Giordano, J, et al. Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 919–929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramia, F, Santoro, A, Pantano, P, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics on MR perfusion images before and after bypass surgery in patients with giant intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1704–1710.Google ScholarPubMed
Bracard, S, Anxionnat, R, Auliac, S, et al. Relevance of diffusion and perfusion weighted MRI for endovascular treatment of vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neuroradiol 2001; 28: 27–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Yoneda, K, Harada, M, Morita, N, et al. Comparison of FAIR technique with different inversion times and post-contrast dynamic perfusion MRI in chronic occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21: 701–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, AW, Harshbarger, T, Li, T, et al. Functional activation using apparent diffusion coefficient-dependent contrast allows better spatial localization to the neuronal activity: evidence using diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 955–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×