Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:46:11.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Collective Guilt in the United States: Predicting Support for Social Policies that Alleviate Social Injustice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Robyn K. Mallett
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Janet K. Swim
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Nyla R. Branscombe
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bertjan Doosje
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

In 1964, the United States government admitted the nation continued to have a problem with race relations. Although slavery had officially ended nearly a century before, a deep racial divide remained between Black and White Americans. In an effort to improve intergroup relations, the government created Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Title VII prohibited discriminatory practices toward applicants for employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Several other legislative acts have made discrimination illegal in different domains (e.g., school desegregation), and blatant acts of racism have diminished since 1964 (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1991; 1998). Yet these laws are being rapidly overturned and discrimination still remains, albeit in a subtler, more ambiguous form (Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Stephan & Stephan, 2000; Swim et al., 2001). Nearly every American has an opinion on issues of race and racism; some believe that racism still exists and others adamantly disagree (McConahay, 1986; Sniderman & Tetlock, 1986). Regardless of which side of the coin opinion is on, it is sure to be strongly held and accompanied by emotion (Smith, 1993; Zanna, 1994).

Perhaps because of the prevalence of these ambivalent opinions and controversy in policy, in 1997 President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 13050 that created the Initiative on Race and an advisory board to make recommendations on how to build a unified nation for the coming century. Board members spent over a year gathering information from around the country on how racism has affected lives.

Type
Chapter
Information
Collective Guilt
International Perspectives
, pp. 56 - 74
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Board (1998). One America in the 21st century: Forging a new future, the President's initiative on race, the Advisory Board's report to the President. (GPO publication number 040-000-00713-0). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Participants' reactions to “equity with the world.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 528–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: W. W. Norton
Barrett, K., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Cole, P. M. (1993). Avoiders vs. amenders: Implications for the investigation of guilt and shame during toddlerhood. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 481–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 173–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differential reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
Branscombe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup's negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Bulka, R. P. (1987). Guilt from, guilt towards. Journal of Psychology and Judaism, 11, 72–90Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (Ed.). (1998). Guilt and children. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 317–44). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Devine, P. G., & Zuwerink, J. R. (1994). Prejudice and guilt: The internal struggle to overcome prejudice. In W. J. Lonner & R. S. Malpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture (pp. 203–7). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1991). Changes in the expression and assessment of racial prejudice. In H. J. Knopke, R. J. Norrell, & R. W. Rogers (Eds.), Opening doors: Perspectives on race relations in contemporary America (pp. 119–48). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1998). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes, consequences, and challenges of aversive racism. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 3–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Estrada-Hollenbeck, M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1998). Avoiding and alleviating guilt through prosocial behavior. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children, (pp. 215–31). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Fazio, R. H., & Hilden, L. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 538–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, J. R., & Sikes, M. P. (1994). Living with racism: The Black middle-class experience. Boston, MA: Beacon Press
Ferguson, T. J., Stegge, H., & Damhuis, I. (1991). Children's understanding of guilt and shame. Child Development, 62, 827–39Google Scholar
Fine, M., Weis, L., Powell, L., & Wong, L. (1997). (Eds.). Off White: Readings on race, power, and society. New York: Routledge
Harder, D. W. & Greenwald, S. R. (1999). Further validation of the shame and guilt scales of the Harder personal feelings questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 85, 271–81Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, R. J. (1976). Handling negative inputs: On the plausible equity formula. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 194–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegtvedt, K. A. (1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, M. L. (1983). Affective and cognitive processes in moral internalization: An information processing approach. In E. T. Higgins, D. Ruble, & S. W. Hartup (Eds.), Developmental social cognition, (pp. 236–74). New York: Cambridge University Press
Hoffman, M. L. (1994). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In B. Puka (Ed.), Reaching out: Caring, altruism, and prosocial behavior. Moral development: A compendium, Vol. 7 (pp. 161–94). New York: Garland
Hoffman, M. L. (1998). Varieties of empathy-based guilt. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 91–112) San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Horowitz, D. (2001). Ten reasons why reparations for Blacks is a bad idea for Blacks – and racist too. http://www.FrontPageMagazine.com
Jackson, M., & Tisak, M. S. (2001). Is prosocial behaviour a good thing? Developmental changes in children's evaluations of helping, sharing, cooperating, and comforting. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 349–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M. L. (1963). Why we can't wait. New York: Harper & Row
King, C. S. (1969). My life with Martin Luther King, Jr. New York: Hold, Rinehart, & Winston
Lerner, M. J. (1981). Justice motive in human relations. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 11–35). New York: Plenum PressCrossRef
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallett, R. K., & Swim, J. K. (2002). But it's not my fault!: Predicting feelings of collective guilt in White Americans. Poster presented at the SPSP annual meeting, held in Savannah, GA.
Mallett, R. K., & Swim, J. K. (2004). Group-based emotions in response to perceived inequity: Antecedents and consequences. Manuscript under review
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press
McIntosh, P. (1998). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. In M. McGoldrick (Ed.), Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture, and gender in clinical practice (pp. 147–52). New York: Guilford Press
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, M. J., Devine, P. G. & Zuwerink, J. R. (1993). Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, F. (1997). Whites oppose formal apology for slavery: Blacks heavily in favor. Retrieved July 25, 1997 from Gallup Poll Analysis
Oubre, C. F. (1978). Forty acres and a mule: The freedmen's bureau and black land ownership. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press
Quiles, Z. N., & Bybee, J. (1997). Chronic and predispositional guilt: Relations to mental health, prosocial behavior and religiosity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 104–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scher, S. J. (1997). Measuring the consequences of injustice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 482–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, S. (1979). Emotion and social life: A symbolic interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1317–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, L. L., Batson, C. D., & Todd, R. M. (1994). Empathy avoidance: Forestalling feeling for another in order to escape the motivational consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 879–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie, & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Steele, S. (1990). White guilt. In S. Steele (Ed.), The content of our character (pp. 77–92). New York: Harper Perennial
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. ‘The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swim, J. K., & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 114–39). New York: Guilford Press
Tatum, B. D. (1994). Teaching White students about racism: The search for White allies and the restoration of hope. Teacher College Record, 95, 462–76Google Scholar
Tatum, B. D. (1997). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? New York: Basic Books
Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers
Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. New York: Westview Press
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 21–43Google Scholar
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., Berscheid, E., Austin, W., Traupmann, J., & Utne, M. K. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Wenzel, M. (2001). A social categorization approach to distributive justice: Social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 315–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C., & Bybee, J. (1994). What do children feel guilty about? Developmental and gender differences. Developmental Psychology, 30, 617–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahn-Waxler, C., & Robinson, J. (1995). Empathy and guilt: Early origins of feelings of responsibility. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 143–73). New York: Guilford Press
Zanna, M. P. (1994). On the nature of prejudice. Canadian Psychology, 35, 11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×