Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Conventionalism
  • Cited by 65
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2009
Print publication year:
2006
Online ISBN:
9780511584404
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584404
Subjects:
Logic, Philosophy
Information

Book description

The daring idea that convention - human decision - lies at the root both of necessary truths and much of empirical science reverberates through twentieth-century philosophy, constituting a revolution comparable to Kant's Copernican revolution. This book provides a comprehensive study of Conventionalism. Drawing a distinction between two conventionalist theses, the under-determination of science by empirical fact, and the linguistic account of necessity, Yemima Ben-Menahem traces the evolution of both ideas to their origins in Poincaré's geometric conventionalism. She argues that the radical extrapolations of Poincaré's ideas by later thinkers, including Wittgenstein, Quine, and Carnap, eventually led to the decline of conventionalism. This book provides a fresh perspective on twentieth-century philosophy. Many of the major themes of contemporary philosophy emerge in this book as arising from engagement with the challenge of conventionalism.

Reviews

Review of the hardback:'… a wonderfully detailed look at the history of conventionalism.'

Source: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
Anderson, J. L. 1967. Principles of Relativity Physics, New York Google Scholar: Academic Press.
Anderson, R., Vetharaniam, I., and Stedman, G. E. 1998. “Conventionality of Synchronisation, Gauge Dependence and Test Theories of Relativity,” Physics Reports 295 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 93–180.
Aspray, W. and Kitcher, P. (eds.) 1988. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics 11, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press.
Ayer, A. J. 1936. “Truth by Convention: A Symposium,” Analysis 4 Google Scholar, 17–22.
Ayer, A. J. 1936a. Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd ed., 1946, London Google Scholar: Victor Gollancz.
Ayer, A. J. (ed.) 1959. Logical Positivism, New York Google Scholar: Free Press.
Babak, S. V. and Grishchuk, L. P. 2000. “The Energy Momentum Tensor for the Gravitational Field,” Physical Review Google Scholar D 61 024038.
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984. Scepticism, Rules and Language, Oxford Google Scholar: Blackwell.
Barbour, J. B. and Pfister, H. (eds.) 1995. Mach's Principle, Berlin Google Scholar: Birkhäuser.
Bar-Elli, G. 1996. The Sense of Reference, Berlin and New York CrossRef | Google Scholar: de Gruyter.
Barrett, R. B. and Gibson, R. F. (eds.) 1990. Perspectives on Quine, Oxford Google Scholar: Blackwell.
Bekenstein, J. D. 2001. “The Limits of Information,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 511–24.
Bell, D. and Vossenkuhl, W. (eds.) 1992. Wissenschaft und Subjektivität/Science and Subjectivity, Berlin Google Scholar: Akademie Verlag.
Belnap, N. 1962. “Tonk, Plonk and Plink,” Analysis 22 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 130–4.
Benacerraf, P. 1973. “Mathematical Truth,” Journal of Philosophy 70 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 661–79.
Benacerraf, P. 1985. “Skolem and the Skeptic,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 59 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 85–115. Also in Shapiro 1996, 419–50.
Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H. (eds.) 1983. Philosophy of Mathematics, Selected Writings, 2nd ed., Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Ben-Menahem, Y. 1993. “Struggling with Causality: Einstein's Case,” Science in Context 12 Google Scholar, 291–310.
Ben-Menahem, Y. 1995. “Pragmatism and Revisionism: James's Conception of Truth,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 270–89.
Ben-Menahem, Y. 1998. “Explanation and Description: Wittgenstein on Convention,” Synthese 115 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 99–130.
Ben-Menahem, Y. 2001. “Convention: Poincaré and Some of His Critics,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 471–513.
Ben-Menahem, Y. 2001a. “Direction and Description,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 621–35.
Ben-Menahem, Y. (ed.) 2005. Hilary Putnam,Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Ben-Menahem, Y. 2005a. “Putnam on Skepticism,” in Ben-Menahem 2005, 125–55. Google Scholar
Bergsrom, L. 1990. “Quine on Underdetermination,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 38–52. Google Scholar
Bergsrom, L. 1993. “Quine, Underdetermination and Skepticism,” Journal of Philosophy 90 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 331–58.
Bernays, P. 1930. “Die Philosophie der Mathematik und die Hilbertsche Beweistheorie,” Blätter für deutsche Philosophie 4, 326–67. Also in Bernays 1976 Google Scholar, 17–61.
Bernays, P. 1967. “What Do Some Recent Results in Set Theory Suggest?” in Lakatos 1967, 109–12. Google Scholar
Bernays, P. 1976. Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik, Darmstadt Google Scholar: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Berry, G. D. W. 1953. “On the Ontological Significance of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem,” in White, M. (ed.), Academic Freedom, Logic and Religion, Philadelphia CrossRef | Google Scholar: American Philosophical Society, University of Pennsylvania Press, 39–55.
Beth, E. W. 1953. “On Padoa's Method in the Theory of Definition,” Indagationes Mathematicae 15 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 330–9.
Beth, E. W. 1959. The Foundations of Mathematics, Amsterdam Google Scholar: North-Holland.
Beth, E. W. 1963. “Carnap's Views on the Advantages of Constructed Systems over Natural Languages in the Philosophy of Science,” in Schilpp 1963, 469–502. Google Scholar
Black, M. 1936. “Truth by Convention: A Symposium,” Analysis 4 Google Scholar, 28–32.
Black, M. 1942. “Conventionalism in Geometry and the Interpretation of Necessary Statements,” Philosophy of Science 9 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 335–49.
Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. 2000. New Essays on the A Priori, Oxford CrossRef | Google Scholar: Clarendon Press.
Braithwaite, R. B. (1955). Scientific Explanation, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Brenner, A. A. 1990. “Holism a Century Ago: The Elaboration of Duhem's Thesis,” Synthese 83 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 325–35.
Buchdahl, H. A. 1981. Seventeen Simple Lectures on General Relativity Theory, New York Google Scholar: John Wiley & Sons.
Burali-Forti, C. 1901. “Sur les différentes méthodes logiques pour la définition du nombre réel,” Bibliothèque du Congrès international de philosophie 3, Paris Google Scholar: A. Colin, 289–308.
Buzaglo, M. 2002. The Logic of Conceptual Expansion, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Capek, M. 1971. Bergson and Modern Physics,Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7, Dordrecht Google Scholar: Reidel.
Carnap, R. 1922. Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre, Kant-Studien. Ergänzungshefte 56, Berlin Google Scholar: Reuther & Reichard.
Carnap, R. 1923. “Über die Aufgabe der Physik und die Anwendung des Grundsatzes der Einfachheit,” Kant-Studien 28 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 90–107.
Carnap, R. 1924. “Dreidimensionalität des Raumes und Kausalität,” Annalen der Philosophie und philosophischen Kritik 4 Google Scholar, 105–30.
Carnap, R. 1927. “Eigentliche und uneigentliche Begriffe,” Symposion: Philosophische Zeitschrift für Forschung und Aussprache 1 Google Scholar, 355–74.
Carnap, R. [1928] 1967. Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis; trans. R. George as The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Carnap, R. 1930. “Die alte und die neue Logik,” Erkenntnis 1 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 12–26; trans. Isaac Levi as “The Old and the New Logic,” in Ayer 1959, 133–46.
Carnap, R. 1930a. “Die Mathematik als Zweig der Logik,” Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 4 Google Scholar, 298–310.
Carnap, R. 1931. “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache,” Erkenntnis 2 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 219–41; trans. A. Pap as “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” in Ayer 1959, 60–82.
Carnap, R. [1932] 1934. “Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft,” Erkenntnis 2 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 432–65; trans. and with an introduction by Max Black as The Unity of Science, London: Kegan Paul, revised by Carnap for the English edition.
Carnap, R. [1934] 1937. Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Julius Springer; trans. A. Smeaton as The Logical Syntax of Language, London CrossRef | Google Scholar: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Carnap, R. 1935. Philosophy and Logical Syntax, London Google Scholar: Kegan Paul.
Carnap, R. 1936–7. “Testability and Meaning,” Philosophy of Science 3, 420–71; 4 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 2–40.
Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Carnap, R. 1950 “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology,” Revue International de Philosophie 4 Google Scholar, 20–40. Also in Carnap 1956, 205–21.
Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed., Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Carnap, R. 1963. “Carnap's Intellectual Autobiography,” in Schilpp 1963, 1–84. Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1963a. “W. V. Quine on Logical Truth,” in Schilpp 1963, 915–21. Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1963b. “E. W. Beth on Constructed Language Systems,” in Schilpp 1963, 927–32. Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1966. Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, New York Google Scholar: Basic Books.
Carroll, L. 1895. “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles,” Mind 4 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 278–80.
Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford CrossRef | Google Scholar: Clarendon.
Ciufolini, I.Dominici, D., and Lusanna, L. (eds.) 2003. 2001: A Relativistic Spacetime Odyssey, Hackensack, NJ CrossRef | Google Scholar: World Scientific.
Clark, P. and Hale, B. (eds.) 1994. Reading Putnam, Oxford Google Scholar: Blackwell.
Coffa, A. J. 1979. “Effective Affinities,” in Salmon 1979, 267–304. Google Scholar
Coffa, A. J. 1986. “From Geometry to Tolerance: Sources of Conventionalism in Nineteenth-Century Geometry,” in Colodny, R. G. (ed.), From Quarks to Quasers: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, Pittsburgh Google Scholar: University of Pittsburgh Press, 3–70.
Coffa, A. J. 1987. “Carnap, Tarski, and the Search for Truth,” Noûs 21 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 547–72.
Coffa, A. J. 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, ed. Wessels, L., Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Conant, J. 1992. “The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus,” Philosophical Topics 20 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 115–80.
Conant, J. 2000. “Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein,” in Crary and Read 2000, 174–217. Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. 1971. “A Semantic Definition of Definition,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 Google Scholar, 366–7.
Corcoran, J. 1980. “Categoricity,” History and Philosophy of Logic 1 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 137–207.
Cornu, A. 1891. “Sur une expérience récente, déterminant la direction de la vibration dans la lumière polarisée,” Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences 112 Google Scholar, 186–9.
Corry, L. 2004. David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics 1898–1918: From Grundlagen der Geometrie to Grundlagen der Physik, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Kluwer.
Crary, A. and Read, R. (eds.) 2000. The New Wittgenstein, London CrossRef | Google Scholar: Routledge.
Creath, R. 1987. “The Initial Reception of Carnap's Doctrine of Analyticity,” Noûs 21 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 477–99.
Creath, R. (ed.) 1990. Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Creath, R. 1992. “Carnap's Conventionalism,” Synthese 93 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 141–65.
Curry, H. B. 1954. “Remarks on the Definition and Nature of Mathematics,” in Benacerraf and Putnam 1983, 202–6. Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,” in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon, 183–98.
Davidson, D. 1995. “Pursuit of the Concept of Truth,” in Leonardi and Santambrogio 1995, 7–21. Google Scholar
Dedekind, J. W. R. [1888] 1932. “Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?” Gesammelte mathematische Werke, ed. Fricke, R, Noether, E., and Ore, O., Braunschweig Google Scholar: F. Vieweg & Sohn, 3:335–91; trans. W. W. Beman in Ewald 1996, 2:790–833.
Diamond, C. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy and the Mind, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: MIT Press.
Diamond, C. 1991a. “Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus,” in Diamond 1991, 179–204. Google Scholar
Diamond, C. 1991b. “The Face of Necessity,” in Diamond 1991, 243–66. Google Scholar
Dieks, D. 1987. “Gravitation as a Universal Force,” Synthese 73 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 381–97.
Dingler, H. 1913. Grundlagen der Naturphilosophie, Leipzig Google Scholar: Verlag Unesma.
Dreben, B. 1990. “Quine,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 81–95. Google Scholar
Dreben, B. and Floyd, J. 1991. “Tautology: How Not to Use a Word,” Synthese 87 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 23–49.
Duhem, P. 1892. “Quelques réflexions au sujet des théories physiques,” Revue des Questions Scientifiques 31 Google Scholar (2nd series), 139–77; trans. R. Ariew and P. Baker as “Some Reflections on the Subject of Physical Theories,” in Duhem 1996, 1–28.
Duhem, P. 1893. “Review of Poincaré 1892, vol. 2,” Revue des Questions Scientifiques 33 Google Scholar (2nd series), 257–9.
Duhem, P. 1894. “Quelques réflexions au sujet de la physique expérimentale,” Revue des Questions Scientifiques 36 Google Scholar (2nd series), 179–229; trans. R. Ariew and P. Baker as “Some Reflections on the Subject of Experimental Physics,” in Duhem 1996, 75–111.
Duhem, P. 1894a. “Les théories de l'optique,” Revue des Deux Mondes 123 Google Scholar, 94–125.
Duhem, P. [1903] 1980. L'Evolution de la méchanique, Paris: Joanin; trans. M. Cole as The Evolution of Mechanics, Alphen aan den Rijn, Nederlans Google Scholar: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
Duhem, P. [1906] 1954. La Théorie physique: son objet, sa structure, 2nd ed., Paris: M. Rivière & Cie, 1914; trans. P. P. Wiener as The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Duhem, P. [1908] 1969. ΣΩZEIN TA ØAINOMENA, Paris: A. Hermann; trans. E. Doland and C. Maschler as To Save the Phenomena, Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Duhem, P. 1913–1959. Le Système du monde, histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, 10 vols., Paris Google Scholar: Herman.
Duhem, P. 1996. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science, ed. and trans. Ariew, R. and Barker, P., Indianapolis Google Scholar: Hackett.
Dummett, M. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas,Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Dummett, M. 1978a. “The Significance of Quine's Indeterminacy Thesis,” in Dummet 1978, 375–419. Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978b. “Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics,” in Dummett 1978, 166–85. Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, London Google Scholar: Duckworth.
Earman, J. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Bradford.
Earman, J. and Norton, J. D. 1987. “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 515–25.
Ebbs, G. 1997. Rule-Following and Realism, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Eddington, A. 1920. Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Eddington, A. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Eddington, A. 1939. The Philosophy of Physical Science, New York Google Scholar: Macmillan.
Ehlers, J., Pirani, F. A. E., and Schild, A. 1972. “The Geometry of Free Fall and Light Propagation,” in O'Raifeartaigh 1972, 63–84. Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 1912. “Lichtgeschwindigkeit und Statik des Gravitationfeldes,” Annalen der Physik 38 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 355–69. Also in Einstein 1996, document 3, 129–43; trans. as “The Speed of Light and the Statics of the Gravitational Field” in Einstein 1996a, 95–106.
Einstein, A. 1916. “Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,” Annalen der Physik 49 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 769–822. Also in Einstein 1997, document 30, 283–339; trans. as “The Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity” in Einstein 1997a, 147–200.
Einstein, A. [1917] 1920. Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, Braunschweig: F. Vieweg & Sohn; trans. R. W. Lawson as Relativity: The Special and the General Theory, London Google Scholar: Methuen.
Einstein, A. 1920. “Äther und Relativitätstheorie,” Berlin CrossRef | Google Scholar: Julius Springer. Also in Einstein 2002, document 38, 306–23; trans. as “Ether and the Theory of Relativity” in Einstein 2002a, 161–82.
Einstein, A. 1920a. Discussions of Bad Nauheim lectures. Physikalische Zeitschrift 21 Google Scholar, 650–1, 662, 666–8. Also in Einstein 2002, document 46, 350–9.
Einstein, A. 1921. “Geometrie und Erfahrung,” Sitzungsberichte der preuss. Akad. der Wissenschaften 1 Google Scholar, 123–30. Also in Einstein 2002, document 52, 383–405; trans. S. Bargmann as “Geometry and Experience” in Einstein 1954, 232–45 and in Einstein 2002a, 208–22.
Einstein, A. 1922. The Meaning of Relativity, 5th ed., 1956, Princeton, NJ CrossRef | Google Scholar: Princeton University Press. Also in Einstein 2002, document 47, 497–589.
Einstein, A. 1927. “Newtons Mechanik und ihr Einfluss auf die Gestaltung der theoretischen Physik,” Die Naturwissenschaften 15 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 273–6; trans. S. Bargmann as “The Mechanics of Newton and Their Influence on the Development of Theoretical Physics” in Einstein 1954, 253–61.
Einstein, A. 1933. “On the Method of Theoretical Physics. The Herbert Spencer Lecture, delivered at Oxford, 10 June 1933,” Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon; new trans. S. Bargmann in Einstein 1954, 270–6.
Einstein, A. 1934. Mein Weltbild, Amsterdam Google Scholar: Querido Verlag.
Einstein, A. 1936. “Physics and Reality,” Journal of the Franklin Institute 221 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 313–47. Also in Einstein 1954, 290–322.
Einstein, A. 1949. “Reply to Criticisms,” in Schilpp 1949, 663–8. Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 1950. “On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation,” Scientific American 182/4 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 13–17. Also in Einstein 1954, 341–55.
Einstein, A. 1954. Ideas and Opinions, New York Google Scholar: Crown.
Einstein, A. 1996. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 4, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Einstein, A. 1996a. English supplement to Einstein 1996; trans. Anna Beck. Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 1997. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 6, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Einstein, A. 1997a. English supplement to Einstein 1997; trans. Alfred Engel. Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 2002. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Einstein, A. 2002a. English supplement to Einstein 2002; trans. Alfred Engel. Google Scholar
Einstein, A.Infeld, L., and Hoffmann, B. 1938. “Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion,” Annals of Mathematics 39 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 65–100.
Elkana, Y. 1974. The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, London Google Scholar: Hutchinson.
Ewald, W. B. (ed.) 1996. From Kant to Hilbert, A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols., Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon.
Feigl, H. 1975. “Homage to Rudolf Carnap,” in Hintikka 1975, ⅹⅲ–ⅹⅶ. Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) 1962. Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1962. “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism,” in Feigl and Maxwell 1962, 28–97. Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P. 1971. Lectures on Gravitation, ed. Morinigo, F. B. and Wagner, W. G., Pasadena Google Scholar: California Institute of Technology.
Field, H. H. bt980. Science Without Numbers, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Fine, A. 1971. “Reflections on a Relational Theory of Space,” Synthese 22 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 448–81.
Fine, A. 1986. “Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to Science,” Mind 95 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 149–79.
Floyd, J. 2001. “Number and Ascriptions of Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus,” in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 145–91. Google Scholar
Floyd, J. and Shieh, S. (eds.) 2001. Future Pasts, Oxford CrossRef | Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Fock, V. [1955] 1966. The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, 2nd revised ed.; trans. from the Russian by N. Kemmer, Oxford Google Scholar: Pergamon Press.
Fraenkel, A. A., Bar Hillel, Y., and Levy, A. 1973. Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd ed., Amsterdam Google Scholar: North-Holland.
Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik,Breslau Google Scholar: W. Koebner; trans. J. Austin as The Foundations of Arithmetic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950.
Frege, G. 1893. Grundgesetze der Artithmetik, Jena: Verlag Hermann Pohle; trans. M. Furth as The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1964 Google Scholar.
Frege, G. 1903. “Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie” (Erste Serie), Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 12 Google Scholar, 319–24 (part I), 368–75 (part II), in Frege 1967, 262–72; trans. E. H. W. Kluge as “On the Foundations of Geometry” (First Series) in Kluge 1971, 22–37.
Frege, G. 1906. “Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie” (Zweite Serie), Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15 Google Scholar, 293–309 (part I), 377–403 (part II), 423–30 (part III), in Frege 1967, 281–323; trans. E. H. W. Kluge as “On the Foundations of Geometry” (Second Series) in Kluge 1971, 49–112.
Frege, G. 1967. Kleine Schriften, ed. Angelelli, I., Hildesheim Google Scholar: Georg Olms.
Frege, G. 1967a. Unbekannte Briefe Freges über die Grundlagen der Geometrie und Antwortbrief Hilberts an Frege, in Frege 1967, 407–18; trans. E. H. W. Kluge as “Correspondence with Hilbert” in Frege 1971, 6–21. Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1971. On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic, ed. and trans. Kluge, E. H. W., New Haven; CT Google Scholar: Yale University Press.
Friedman, M. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Friedman, M. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Friedman, M. 1996. “Poincaré's Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists,” in Greffe et al. 1996, 333–44. Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1999. Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Gergonne, J. D. 1818. “Essai sur la théorie des définitions,” Annales de Mathématiques 9 Google Scholar, 1–35.
Giannoni, C. B. 1971. Conventionalism in Logic, The Hague CrossRef | Google Scholar: Mouton.
Gibson, R. F. Jr. 1986 Google Scholar. “Translation, Physics and Facts of the Matter,” in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, 139–54.
Giedymin, J. 1982. Science and Convention, Oxford Google Scholar: Pergamon.
Giedymin, J. 1991. “Geometrical and Physical Conventionalism of Henri Poincaré in Epistemological Formulation,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 22 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 1–22.
Giere, R. N. and Richardson, A. W. (eds.) 1996. Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press.
Glymour, C. 1971. “Theoretical Realism and Theoretical Equivalence,” in Buck, R. C. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, Dordrecht Google Scholar: Reidel, 275–88.
Glymour, C. 1972. “Topology, Cosmology and Convention,” Synthese 24 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 195–218.
Glymour, C. 1980. Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Gödel, K. 1930. “Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalküls, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 37 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 349–60; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as “The Completeness of the Axioms of the Functional Calculus of Logic,” in van Heijenoort 1967, 582–91.
Gödel, K. 1931. “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I,” Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38 Google Scholar, 178–98; trans. J. van Heijenoort as “On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems,” in van Heijenoort 1967, 596–616.
Gödel, K. 1953. “Is Mathematics Syntax of Language?” in Gödel 1995, 335–62. Google Scholar
Gödel, K. 1961. “The Modern Developments of the Foundations of Mathematics in the Light of Philosophy,” in Gödel 1995, 375–88. Google Scholar
Gödel, K. 1995. Kurt Godel: Collected Works, ed. Feferman, S.., vol. 3, Oxford Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Goldfarb, W. D. 1988. “Poincaré against the Logicists,” in Aspray and Kitcher 1988, 61–81. Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. D. 1995. “Introductory Note to Gödel (1953),” in Gödel 1995, 324–34. Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. D. 1996. “The Philosophy of Mathematics in Early Positivism,” in Giere and Richardson 1996, 213–30. Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. and Ricketts, T. 1992. “Carnap and the Philosophy of Mathematics,” in Bell and Vossenkuhl 1992, 61–78. Google Scholar
Gould, C. C. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.) 1994. Artifacts, Representations and Social Practice, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Kluwer.
Grayling, A. C. 1998. An Introduction to Philosophical Logic, 3rd ed., Oxford Google Scholar: Blackwell.
Grassmann, H. 1844. Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre, Leipzig Google Scholar: Otto Wigand Verlag; trans. in Grassmann 1995, 9–297.
Grassmann, H. 1995. A New Branch of Mathematics, The Ausdehnungslehre of 1844 and Other Works; trans. L. C. Kannenberg, Chicago and La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.
Greene, B. 1999. The Elegant Universe, New York Google Scholar: W. W. Norton.
Greene, B. 2004. The Fabric of the Cosmos,New York Google Scholar: Knopf.
Greffe, J. L., Heinzmann, G. and Lorenz, K. (eds.) 1996. Henri Poincaré, Science and Philosophy, International Congress Nancy 1994, Berlin: Akademie Verlag; Paris Google Scholar: Albert Blanchard.
Grünbaum, A. 1962. “Geometry, Chronometry, and Empiricism,” in Feigl and Maxwell 1962, 405–526. Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. 1968. Geometry and Chronometry, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press.
Grünbaum, A. 1973. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd ed., Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel.
Grünbaum, A. 1976. “The Duhemian Argument,” in Harding 1976, 116–31. Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1992. “Wittgenstein on Frazer's “Golden Bough,” Iyyun 41 Google Scholar, 277–300.
Hahn, L. E. and Schilpp, P. A. (eds.) 1986. The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, Library of Living Philosophers 18, La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.
Hale, B. and Wright, C. 2000. “Implicit Definition and the A Priori,” in Boghossian and Peacocke 2000, 286–319. Google Scholar
Harding, S. (ed.) 1976. Can Theories Be Refuted?Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel.
Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W. (eds.) 1979. General Relativity, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Healey, R. 1987. “Critical Review of Michael Friedman's Foundations of Space-Time Theories,” Noûs 21 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 595–601.
Held, A. (ed.) 1980. General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years after the Birth of Albert Einstein, New York Google Scholar: Plenum.
Hellman, G. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers, Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon.
Helmholtz, H.. [1847] 1882. “Über die Erhaltung der Kraft,” in Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 1, Leipzig Google Scholar: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 12–75.
Helmholtz, H.. 1876. “The Origin and Meaning of Geometrical Axioms,” Mind 1 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 301–21. Also in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 663–85.
Hempel, C. G. 1958. “The Theoretician's Dilemma: A Study in the Logic of Theory Construction,” in Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation,New York Google Scholar: Free Press, 1965, 173–226.
Henkin, L. 1950. “Completeness in the Theory of Types,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 81–91.
Hertz, H. [1894] 1956. Die Principien der Mechanik, Leipzig: Barth; trans. D. E. Jones and J. T. Walley as The Principles of Mechanics, New York Google Scholar: Dover.
Hilbert, D. [1899] 1902. “Grundlagen der Geometrie,” in Festschrift zur Feier der Enthüllung des Gauss-Weber Denkmals in Göttingen,Leipzig: Teubner; trans. E. J. Townsend as The Foundations of Geometry, Chicago Google Scholar: Open Court.
Hilbert, D. [1899a] 1971. Grundlagen der Geometrie, 10th ed., Leipzig: Teubner; trans. Leo Unger as Foundations of Geometry, 2nd ed. revised and expanded by Paul Bernays, La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.
Hilbert, D. 1905. “Über die Grundlagen der Logik und der Arithmetik,” Verhandlungen des Dritten Internationalen Mathematiker-Kongresses vom 8 bis 13 August 1904,Leipzig Google Scholar: Teubner, 174–85; trans. Beverly Woodward as “On the Foundations of Logic and Arithmetic” in van Heijenoort 1967, 130–8.
Hilbert, D. 1922. “Neubegründung der Mathematik; Erste Mitteilung,” in Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Berlin Google Scholar: Springer, 1932–5, 3, 157–77; trans. W. Ewald as “The New Grounding of Mathematics” in Ewald 1996, 2, 1115–34.
Hilbert, D. 1926. “Über das Unendliche,” Mathematische Annalen 95 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 161–90; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as “On the Infinite” in van Heijenoort 1967, 367–92.
Hintikka, J. (ed.) 1975. Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist, Synthese Library 83, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel.
Hintikka, J. 1990. “Quine as a Member of the Tradition of the Universality of Language,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 159–74. Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1992. “Carnap's Work in the Foundations of Logic and Mathematics in a Historical Perspective,” Synthese 93 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 167–89.
Hintikka, J. 1993. “Ludwig's Apple Tree: On the Philosophical Relations between Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle,” in Stadler 1993. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 2001. “Ernst Mach at the Crossroads of Twentieth-Century Philosophy,” in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 81–100. Google Scholar
Hintikka, M. B. and Hintikka, J. 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein, Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Hiskes, A. L. 1986. “Friedman on the Foundations of Space-Time Theories,” Erkenntnis 25 Google Scholar, 111–26.
Hoefer, C. 1994. “Einstein's Struggle for a Machian Gravitation Theory,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 287–335.
Horwich, P. 1997. “Implicit Definition, Analytic Truth, and Apriori Knowledge,” Noûs 31 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 423–40.
Howard, D. 1990. “Einstein and Duhem,” Synthese 83 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 363–84.
Howard, D. 1994. “Einstein, Kant, and the Origins of Logical Empiricism,” in Salmon and Wolters 1994, 45–105. Google Scholar
Howard, D. 1996. “Relativity, Eindeutigkeit, and Monomorphism: Rudolf Carnap and the Development of the Categoricity Concept in Formal Semantics,” in Giere and Richardson 1996, 115–64. Google Scholar
Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.) 1989. Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Einstein Studies 1, Boston and Berlin Google Scholar: Birkhaüser.
Hylton, P. 2001 “‘The Defensible Province of Philosophy’: Quine's 1934 Lectures on Carnap,” in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 257–76. Google Scholar
James, W. [1907–9] 1955. Pragmatism, Cleveland Google Scholar: Meridian.
Kreisel, G. 1958. “Wittgenstein's Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 135–58.
Kretschmann, E. 1917. “Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulate, A. Einsteins neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitätstheorie,” Annalen der Physik 53 Google Scholar, 575–614.
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language,Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970 Google Scholar.
Lakatos, I. (ed.) 1967. Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, Amsterdam Google Scholar: North-Holland.
Lakatos, I. 1981. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, ed. Worrall, J. and Zahar, E., Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. 1976. “Grünbaum on ‘The Duhemian Argument,’” in Harding 1976, 155–61. Google Scholar
Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Laudan, L. 1990. Science and Relativism, Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Laudan, L. and Leplin, J. 1991. “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination,” Journal of Philosophy 88 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 449–72.
Leonardi, P. and Santambrogio, M. (eds.) 1995. On Quine, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, Y. 1995. “Synthetic Apriority,” Erkenntnis 43 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 137–50.
Lewis, C. I. and Langford, C. H. 1932. Symbolic Logic, New York Google Scholar: Century.
Lewis, D. 1969. Convention, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Longino, H. E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Löwenheim, L. 1915. “Über Möglichkeiten im Relativkalkül,” Mathematische Annalen 76 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 447–70; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as “On Possibilities in the Calculus of Relatives” in van Heijenoort 1967, 228–51.
Maiocchi, R. 1990. “Pierre Duhem's The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory: A Book against Conventionalism,” Synthese 83 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 385–400.
Malament, D. B. 1977. “Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity,” Nous 11 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 293–300.
Malament, D. B. (ed.) 2002. Reading Natural Philosophy, Chicago and La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.
Margalit, A. 1992. “Wittgenstein on The Golden Bough,” Iyyun 41 Google Scholar, 301–18.
Martin, R. N. D. 1982. “Darwin and Duhem” [Review of Paul 1979], History of Science 20 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 64–75.
Martin, R. N. D. 1990. “Duhem and the Origins of Statics: Ramifications of the Crisis of 1903–4,” Synthese 83 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 337–55.
Mates, B. 1972. Elementary Logic, 2nd ed., New York Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Mauthner, F. 1923. Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache, 3 vols., 3rd ed., Leipzig Google Scholar: F. Meiner Verlag.
McDowell, J. 1998. Mind, Value and Reality, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
McMullin, E. 1990. “Comment: Duhem's Middle Way,” Synthese 83 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 421–30.
Misner, W. C., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. 1973. Gravitation, San Francisco Google Scholar: W. H. Freeman.
Monk, R. 1990. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London Google Scholar: Vintage.
Moore, G. E. 1921–2. “External and Internal Relations,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 40–62. Also in Moore, Philosophical Studies, London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1922, 276–309.
Moore, G. E. 1954. “Wittgenstein's Lectures in 1930–33,” Mind 63, 1–15, 289–315; 64 CrossRef | Google Scholar 1–27. Also in Wittgenstein 1993, 46–114.
Morrison, M. 2000. Unifying Scientific Theories,Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, A. and Fine A. 2005. “Realism, Beyond Miracles,” in Ben-Menahem 2005, 83–124. Google Scholar
Myhill, T. R. 1953. “On the Ontological Significance of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem,” in White, M. (ed.), Academic Freedom, Logic and Religion, APA Eastern Division Meeting, Philadelphia CrossRef | Google Scholar: University of Pennsylvania Press, 57–70.
Nagel, E. 1939. “The Formation of Modern Conceptions of Formal Logic in the Development of Geometry,” Osiris 7 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 142–224.
Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science, London Google Scholar: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Narlikar, J. V. and Padmanabhan, T. 1986. Gravity, Gauge Theories and Quantum Cosmology, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel.
Norton, J. 1989. “What Was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?” in Howard and Stachel 1989, 5–47. Google Scholar
Norton, J. 1993. “General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute,” Reports of Progress in Physics 56 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 791–858.
Norton, J. (1995). “Did Einstein Stumble? The Debate over General Covariance,” Erkenntnis 42 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 223–45.
Nye, M. J. 1976. “The Moral Freedom of Man and the Determinism of Nature: The Catholic Synthesis of Science and History in the Revue des Questions Scientifiques,” British Journal for the History of Science 9 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 274–92.
O'Raifeartaigh, L. (ed.) 1972. General Relativity: Papers in Honour of J. L. Synge, Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon.
Padoa, A. 1901. “Essai d'une théorie algébrique des nombres entiers, précédé d'une introduction logique à une théorie déductive quelconque,” Bibliothèque du Congrès international de philosophie, 3, Paris Google Scholar: A Colin, 309–65; trans. J. van Heijenoort in van Heijenoort 1967, 118–23.
Pais, A. 1982. Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon.
Parsons, C. 1990. “The Structuralist View of Mathematical Objects,” Synthese 84 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 303–46.
Parsons, C. 1992. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press, 62–100.
Parsons, C. 1995. “Quine and Godel on Analyticity,” in Leonardi and Santambrogio 1995, 297–313. Google Scholar
Pasch, M. 1882. Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie, 2nd ed., 1912, Leipzig Google Scholar: Teubner.
Pasch, M. 1892. “Über die Einführung der irrationalen Zahlen,” Mathematische Annalen 40 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 149–52.
Paul, H. W. 1979. The Edge of Contingency, Gainesville Google Scholar: University of Florida Press.
Peano, G. 1889. I Principii di Geometria logicamente esposti,Torino Google Scholar: Fratelli Bocca.
Pears, D. 1987. The False Prison,Oxford CrossRef | Google Scholar: Clarendon.
Penrose, R. 2004. The Road to Reality, London Google Scholar: Jonathan Cape.
Pieri, M. 1901. “Sur la géométrie envisagée comme un système purement logique,” In Bibliothèque du Congrès international de philosophie, 3, Paris Google Scholar: A Colin, 367–404.
Pitowsky, I. 1984. “Unified Field Theory and the Conventionality of Geometry,” Philosophy of Science 51 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 685–9.
Pitowsky, I. 1994. “On the Concept of Proof in Modern Mathematics,” unpublished. Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1891. “Sur l'expérience de M.Wiener,” Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des sciences 112 Google Scholar, 325–9.
Poincaré, H. 1892. Théorie mathématique de la lumière, 2 vols., Paris Google Scholar: G. Carré.
Poincaré, H. 1898. “On the Foundations of Geometry,” The Monist 9 Google Scholar, 1–43.
Poincaré, H. 1898a. “De la mesure du temps,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 6 Google Scholar, 1–13.
Poincaré, H. 1899. “Des fondements de la géométrie,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 7 Google Scholar, 251–79.
Poincaré, H. 1900. “Du rôle de l'intuition et de la logique en mathématiques,” in Compte rendu du deuxième Congrès international des mathématiques tenu à Paris du 6 au 12 août 1900,Paris Google Scholar: Gauthier-Villars, 115–30; trans. G. B. Halsted as “Intuition and Logic in Mathematics” in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 1012–20.
Poincaré, H. 1901. Électricité et optique, Paris Google Scholar: Gauthier-Villars.
Poincaré, H. [1902] 1952. La Science et l'hypothèse, Paris Google Scholar: Flammarion; trans. W. S. Greenstreet as Science and Hypothesis, New York: Dover.
Poincaré, H. 1902a. “Compte rendu et analyses” [Review of Hilbert 1899], Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques, 2 ser. 26 Google Scholar, 249–72; trans. E. Huntington in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 10, 1903, 1–23.
Poincaré, H. 1905–6. “Les Mathématiques et la logique,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 13, 815–35; 14 Google Scholar, 17–34, 294–317; trans. G. B. Halsted as “Mathematics and Logic” in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 1021–1074.
Poincaré, H. 1905a. “The Principles of Mathematical Physics,” The Monist 15 Google Scholar, 1–24.
Poincaré, H. [1908] 1956. Science et méthode, Paris: Flammarion; trans. F. Maitland as Science and Method, New York Google Scholar: Dover.
Poincaré, H. 1913. The Foundations of Science, Lancaster, PA Google Scholar: Science Press.
Poincaré, H. [1913a] 1963. Dernières pensées, Paris: Flammarion; trans. Bolduc, J. W. as Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, New York Google Scholar: Dover.
Pollock, J. L. 1967. “Mathematical Proof,” American Philosophical Quarterly 4 Google Scholar, 238–44.
Popper, K. [1934] 1959. Logik der Forschung, Vienna: Julius Springer Verlag, 1935; trans. by the author as The Logic of Scientific Discovery,London Google Scholar: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. 1963. “Science: Conjectures and Refutations,” in Conjectures and Refutations, New York Google Scholar: Harper & Row, 33–65.
Prior, A. N. 1960. “The Runabout Inference-Ticket,” Analysis 21 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 38–9.
Proust, J. 1987. “Formal Logic as Transcendental in Wittgenstein and Carnap,” Nous 21 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 500–20.
Putnam, H. 1963. “An Examination of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Space and Time,” in Baumrin, B. (ed.), The Delaware Seminar in Philosophy of Science, New York Google Scholar: Interscience Publishers, 205–55, reprinted as “An Examination of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Geometry” in Putnam 1975, 93–129.
Putnam, H. 1965. “Trial and Error Predicates and the Solution to a Problem of Mostowski,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 49–57.
Putnam, H. 1967. “Mathematics Without Foundations,” Journal of Philosophy 64 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 5–22. Also in Putnam 1975, 43–59.
Putnam, H. 1973. “Explanation and Reference,” in Pearce, G. and Maynard, P. (eds.), Conceptual Change, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel, 199–221. Also in Putnam 1975a, 196–214.
Putnam, H. 1974. “The Refutation of Conventionalism,” Noûs 8 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 25–40; revised version in Putnam 1975a, 153–91.
Putnam, H. 1975. Mathematics, Matter and Method, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. 1975a. Mind, Language and Reality, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. 1975b. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning,’” in Gunderson, K. (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press, 131–93. Also in Putnam 1975a, 215–71.
Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences, London Google Scholar: Routledge.
Putnam, H. 1979. “Analyticity and Apriority: Beyond Wittgenstein and Quine,” in French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press, 423–41. Also in Putnam 1983, 98–114.
Putnam, H. 1980. “Models and Reality,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 464–82. Also in Putnam 1983, 1–24.
Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. 1983. Realism and Reason, Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. 1994. “Rethinking Mathematical Necessity,” in Words and Life, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press, 245–63.
Putnam, H. 2004. Ethics without Ontology, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. 1934. “Lectures on Carnap,” in Creath 1990, 47–103. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. [1936] 1966. “Truth by Convention,” in Lee, O. H. (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, New York Google Scholar: Longmans, 90–124. Also in Quine 1966, 70–99.
Quine, W. V. 1937. “Is Logic a Matter of Words?” MS 102–61–05, Carnap Collection, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1948. “On What There Is,” Review of Metaphysics 2 Google Scholar, 21–38. Also in Quine 1953a, 1–19.
Quine, W. V. 1951 “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” Philosophical Review 60 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 20–43. Also in Quine 1953a, 20–46.
Quine, W. V. 1951a. “Carnap's Views on Ontology,” Philosophical Studies 2 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 65–72. Also in Quine 1966, 126–34.
Quine, W. V. 1953. “Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory,” Mind 62 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 433–51. Also in Quine 1966, 135–55.
Quine, W. V. 1953a. From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. 1960. “Carnap and Logical Truth,” Synthese 12 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 350–74. Also in Schilpp 1963, 385–406 and Quine 1966, 100–125.
Quine, W. V. 1960a. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. 1963. “On Simple Theories of a Complex World,” Synthese 15 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 107–111. Also in Quine 1966, 242–5.
Quine, W. V. 1964. “Necessary Truth,” in Quine 1966, 48–56. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1964a. “Implicit Definition Sustained,” Journal of Philosophy 61 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 71–74. Also in Quine 1966, 195–8.
Quine, W. V. 1966. The Ways of Paradox, New York Google Scholar: Random House.
Quine, W. V. 1968. “Ontological Relativity,” Journal of Philosophy 65 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 185–212. Also in Quine 1969, 26–68.
Quine, W. V. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York Google Scholar: Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. 1969a. “Epistemology Naturalized,” in Quine 1969, 69–89. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1970. Philosophy of Logic, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Google Scholar: Prentice Hall.
Quine, W. V. 1970a. “On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation,” Journal of Philosophy 67 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 178–83.
Quine, W. V. 1975. “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World,” Erkenntnis 9 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 313–28.
Quine, W. V. 1981. Theories and Things, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. 1986. “Reply to Roger F. Gibson, Jr,” in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, 155–8. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1990 “Three Indeterminacies,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 1–16. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1990a. “Comment on Hintikka,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 176–7. Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1991. “Two Dogmas in Retrospect,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 265–74.
Quine, W. V. 1992. Pursuit of Truth, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. 1995. From Stimulus to Science, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. 1995a. “Reactions,” in Leonardi and Santambrogio 1995, 347–61. Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1931. The Foundation of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, London Google Scholar: Kegan Paul.
Reichenbach, H. [1920] 1965. Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori,Berlin: Springer; trans. M. Reichenbach as The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge, Los Angeles CrossRef | Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Reichenbach, H. [1922] 1978. Der gegenwärtige Stand der Relativitätsdiskussion, Logos 10, 316–78; trans. M. Reichenbach as “The Present State of the Discussion on Relativity: A Critical Investigation,” in Hans Reichenbach; Selected Writings 1909–1953, vol. 2, ed. M. Reichenbach and R. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel, 3–47. Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. [1928] 1958. Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre,Berlin: de Gruyter; trans. M. Reichenbach and J. Freund as The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York CrossRef | Google Scholar: Dover.
Reichenbach, H. 1938. Experience and Prediction, Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Reichenbach, H. 1949. “The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity,” in Schilpp 1949, 287–312. Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. 1971. The Direction of Time, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Ricketts, T. G. 1985. “Frege, the Tractatus and the Logocentric Predicament,” Noûs 19 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 3–15.
Ricketts, T. G. 1994. “Carnap's Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism and Conventionalism,” in Clark and Hale 1994, 176–200. Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. G. 1996. “Carnap: From Logical Syntax to Semantics,” in Giere and Richardson 1996, 231–50. Google Scholar
Riemann, B. G. F. 1868. “Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen,” in Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen Google Scholar, 13; trans. W. K. Clifford as “On the Hypotheses which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry,” in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 652–61.
Robinson, A. 1956. “On Beth's Test in the Theory of Definitions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 Google Scholar, 220–1.
Russell, B. 1897. An Essay on the Foundation of Geometry, Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. 1898. “Les axiomes propres à Euclide: sont-ils empiriques?” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 6 Google Scholar, 759–76.
Russell, B. 1899. “Sur les axiomes de la géométrie,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 7 Google Scholar, 684–707.
Russell, B. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London Google Scholar: George Allen and Unwin.
Ryckman, T. A. 1992. “P(oint) C(oincidence) Thinking: The Ironic Attachment of Logical Empiricism to General Relativity,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 471–97.
Ryckman, T. A. 1994. “Weyl, Reichenbach and the Epistemology of Geometry,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 831–70.
Ryckman, T. A. 1999. “World Geometries: Weyl and Eddington,” paper presented at the Bar-Hillel Colloquium for the History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, May 26, 1999. Google Scholar
Ryckman, T. A. 2005. The Reign of Relativity, Oxford CrossRef | Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Salmon, W. (ed.) 1979. Hans Reichenbach: Logical Empiricist, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel.
Salmon, W. and Wolters, G. (eds.) 1994. Language, Logic, and the Structure of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; Konstanz Google Scholar: Universitätsverlag.
Sarkar, S. 1992. “‘The Boundless Ocean of Unlimited Possibilities’: Logic in Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language,” Synthese 93 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 191–237.
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) 1949. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Library of Living Philosophers, La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) 1963. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Library of Living Philosophers, La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.
Schlick, M. [1917] 1920. Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik, 3rd ed., Berlin CrossRef | Google Scholar: Springer; trans. H. L. Brose as Space and Time in Contemporary Physics, Oxford: Clarendon.
Schlick, M. [1925] 1974. Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, 3rd ed., Berlin CrossRef | Google Scholar: Julius Springer; trans. A. E. Blumberg as General Theory of Knowledge, Vienna and New York: Springer.
Schlick, M. 1979. Philosophical Papers, ed. Mulder, H. I. and Velde, B. F. B., trans. P. Heath, W. Sellars, H. Feigl, and M. Brodbeck, 2 vols., Dordrecht Google Scholar: Reidel.
Schrödinger, E. 1950. Space-Time Structure. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Shanker, S. G. 1987. Wittgenstein and the Turning-Point in the Philosophy of Mathematics, Albany Google Scholar: SUNY Press.
Shapiro, S. 1985. “Second-Order Languages and Mathematical Practice,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 714–42. Also in Shapiro 1996, 89–118.
Shapiro, S. (ed.) 1996. The Limits of Logic, Aldershot, England and Brookfield VT Google Scholar: Dartmouth.
Sher, G. 1996. “Did Tarski Commit ‘Tarski's Fallacy’?” Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 653–86.
Sher, G. 1998–9. “On the Possibility of a Substantive Theory of Truth,” Synthese 117 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 133–92.
Sieg, W. 2002. “Beyond Hilbert's Reach,” in Malament 2002, 363–405. Google Scholar
Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Sklar, L. 1985. Philosophy and Spacetime Physics, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Skolem, Th. 1920. “Logische-kombinatorische Untersuchungen über die Erfüllbarkeit und Beweisbarkeit mathematischer Sätze nebst einem Theorem über dichte Mengen,” in Skolem 1970, 103–36; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as “Logico-combinatorial investigations in the satisfiability or provability of mathematical propositions: A simplified proof of a theorem by L. Löwenheim and generalizations of the theorem,” in van Heijenoort 1967, 254–63. Google Scholar
Skolem, Th. 1922. “Einige Bemerkungen zur axiomatischen Begründung der Mengenlehre,” in Skolem 1970, 137–52; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as “Some remarks on axiomatised set theory” in van Heijenoort 1967, 290–301. Google Scholar
Skolem, Th. 1929. “Über die Grundlagendiskussionen in der Mathematik,” in Skolem 1970, 207–25. Google Scholar
Skolem, Th. 1970. Selected Works in Logic, ed. Fenstad, J. E., Oslo Google Scholar: Universitetsforlaget.
Smolin, L. 2001. Three Roads to Quantum Gravity, New York Google Scholar: Basic Books.
Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Stachel, J. 1989. “Einstein's Search for General Covariance,” in Howard and Stachel 1989, 63–100. Google Scholar
Stachel, J. 1994. “Changes in the Concepts of Space and Time Brought About by Relativity,” in Gould and Cohen 1994, 141–62. Google Scholar
Stachel, J. 2002. “‘The Relations between Things’ versus ‘The Things between Relations’: The Deeper Meaning of the Hole Argument,” in Malament 2002, 231–66. Google Scholar
Stachel, J. 2002a. Einstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z,’Berlin Google Scholar: Birkhäuser.
Stachel, J. 2003. “A Brief History of Space-Time,” in Ciufolini et al. 2003, 15–34. Google Scholar
Stadler, F. (ed.) 1993. Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Kluwer.
Stein, H. 1977. “Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity,” in Earman, J., Glymour, C., and Stachel, J. (eds.) Foundations of Spacetime Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, Minneapolis Google Scholar: University of Minnesota Press, 3–49.
Stein, H. 1988. “Logos, Logic, and Logistiké: Some Philosophical Remarks on Nineteenth-Century Transformation of Mathematics,” in Aspray and Kitcher 1988, 238–59. Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1992. “Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, After All?” Synthese 93 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 275–95.
Steiner, M. 1996. “Wittgenstein: Mathematics, Regularities, Rules,” in Morton, A. and Stich, S. P. (eds.), Benacerraf and His Critics,Oxford Google Scholar: Blackwell, 190–212.
Steiner, M. 1998. The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Steiner, M. 2001. “Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Godel's Theorem,” Philosophia Mathematica (ser. 3) 9 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 257–79.
Steiner, M. (2005). “Empirical Regularities in Wittgenstein,” unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar
Stroud, B. 1965. “Wittgenstein and Logical Necessity,” Philosophical Review 74 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 504–18.
Stroud, B. 1969. “Conventionalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation,” in Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J. (eds.), Words and Objections,Dordrecht Google Scholar: Reidel.
Synge, J. L. 1960. Relativity: The General Theory, Amsterdam Google Scholar: North Holland.
Tarski, A. 1940. “The Completeness of Elementary Algebra and Geometry,” in Tarski 1986, vol. 4, 289–346. Google Scholar
Tarski, A. 1951. A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry, Berkeley Google Scholar: University of California Press.
Tarski, A. 1956. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Tarski, A. 1986. Collected Papers, ed. Givant, S. R. and McKenzie, R. N., Basel Google Scholar: Birkhäuser.
Tharp, L. H. 1975. “Which Logic Is the Right Logic?” Synthese 31 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 1–21. Also in Shapiro 1996, 47–68.
Thorne, K. S. 1996. Black Holes and Time Warps, New York Google Scholar: W. W. Norton.
Thorne, K. S., LeeD. L., D. L., and Lightman, A. P. 1973. “Foundations for a Theory of Gravitation Theories,” Physical Review D7 Google Scholar 3563–78.
Torretti, R. 1978. Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, Dordrecht CrossRef | Google Scholar: Reidel.
Torretti, R. [1983] 1996. Relativity and Geometry, 1st ed., Oxford: Pergamon; 2nd ed., New York Google Scholar: Dover.
Trautman, A. 1980. “Fiber Bundles, Gauge Fields, and Gravitation,” in Held 1980, vol. 1, 287–308. Google Scholar
Tymoczko, T. 1989. “In Defense of Putnam's Brains,” Philosophical Studies 57 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 281–97.
Van Fraassen, B. C. 1997. “Putnam's Paradox: Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded,” in Tomberlin, J. E. (ed.), Mind, Causation and World, Philosophical Perspectives, 11, Oxford Google Scholar: Blackwell, 17–42.
Heijenoort, J. (ed.) 1967. From Frege to Gödel, A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Veblen, O. 1904. “A System of Axioms for Geometry,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 5 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 343–84.
Veronese, G. 1894. Grundzüge der Geometrie, Leipzig Google Scholar: B. G. Trubner.
Wright, G. H. 1971. Explanation and Understanding, London Google Scholar: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Waismann, F. 1979. Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, ed. B. McGuinness; tr. J. Schulte and B. McGuinness, Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Wang, H. 1970. “A Survey of Skolem's Work in Logic,” in Skolem 1970, 17–52. Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, New York Google Scholar: John Wiley & Sons.
Weinberg, S. 2001. “Can Science Explain Everything? Anything?” New York Review of Books, vol. 48 Google Scholar, no. 9.
Weingard, R. and Smith, G. 1986. “Critical Notice: Michael Friedman's Foundations of Space-Time Theories,” Philosophy of Science 53 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 286–99.
Weyl, H. [1921] 1952. Raum-Zeit-Materie, 4th ed., Berlin: Springer; trans. Brose, H. L. as Space-Time-Matter, London: Methuen; New York CrossRef | Google Scholar: Dover.
Weyl, H. 1922. “Die Relativitätstheorie auf der Naturforscherversammlung in Bad Nauheim,” Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 31 Google Scholar, 51–63.
Wheeler, J. A. 1962. Geometrodynamics, New York Google Scholar: Academic Press.
Whitely, C. I. 1936. “Truth by Convention: A Symposium,” Analysis 4 Google Scholar, 22–28.
Wiener, O. 1890. “Stehende Lichtwellen und die Schwingungsrichtung polarisierten Lichtes,” Wiedemann's Annalen 40 Google Scholar, 203–13.
Will, C. M. 1979. “The Confrontation between Gravitation Theory and Experiment,” in Hawking and Israel 1979, 24–89. Google Scholar
Will, C. M. 1993. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, rev. ed., Cambridge CrossRef | Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. [1921] 1961. “Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung,” Annalen der Naturphilosophie 14, 184–262; trans. C. K. Ogden and F. P. Ramsey as Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1922; trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations (PI); trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. [1956] 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics (RFM), ed. Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe;, G. E. M. trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 3rd rev. edition 1978 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Notebooks 1914–16, ed. Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. 1974. Philosophical Grammar (PG), ed. Rhees, R.; trans. A. Kenny, Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. 1976. Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics (LFM), ed. Diamond, C., Ithaca, NY Google Scholar: Cornell University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. 1977. On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. H. and Wright, G. H.; trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. 1979. Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, ed. Rhees, R., Retford Google Scholar: Brynmill. Also in Wittgenstein 1993, 119–55.
Wittgenstein, L. 1979a. Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932–1935, ed. Ambrose, A., Oxford Google Scholar: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. 1980. Culture and Value; trans. P. Winch, Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein, L. 1993. Philosophical Occasions (PO), ed. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A., Indianapolis Google Scholar: Hackett.
Wittgenstein, L. 1993a. “Philosophy,” in Wittgenstein 1993, 160–99. Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1993b. “Notes for the ‘Philosophical Lecture,’” in Wittgenstein 1993, 447–58. Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1980. Wittgenstein on the Foundations of Mathematics, London Google Scholar: Duckworth.
Zahar, E. G. 1997. “Poincaré's Philosophy of Geometry, or Does Geometric Conventionalism Deserve its Name?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 CrossRef | Google Scholar, 183–218.
Zahar, E. G. 2001. Poincaré's Philosophy, Chicago and La Salle, IL Google Scholar: Open Court.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.