Abbott, Frederick M.: Second Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of the Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Importation, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 2000 (http://ssrn.com/%20abstract=1921856).Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M.: Parallel Importation: Economic and Social Welfare Dimensions, 2007 (www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/parallel_importation.pdf).Google Scholar

Abelson, Sarah: An Emerging Secondary Market for Digital Music – The Legality of ReDigi and the Extent of the First Sale Doctrine, Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, Winter 2012, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

Acquah, Daniel: Opoku: CJEU Invokes ERTA Principle to Assert EU Competence to Ratify Marrakesh Treaty, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 7/2017, pp. 548–550.Google Scholar

Acquah, Daniel: Book Review – Peter Mezei: Copyright Exhaustion: Law and Policy of the United States and the European Union, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 3/2019, pp. 673–678.Google Scholar

Ahrens, Sönke: Die Auswirkungen des Brexits auf die Rechte des geistigen Eigentums, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/2020, pp. 382–392.Google Scholar

Akkermans, Bram, and Ramaekers, Eveline: Article 345 TFEU (ex. 295 EC), Its Meanings and Interpretations, European Law Journal, Vol. 3/2010, pp. 292–314.Google Scholar

Alderman, Elliott C.: Resale Royalties in the United States for Fine Visual Artists: An Alien Concept, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 40/1983, pp. 265–283.Google Scholar

Alderman, Liz: Along the Seine, Booksellers Try to Hold Off an Unhappy Ending, The New York Times, November 7, 2020 (www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/world/europe/france-paris-seine-books.html).Google Scholar

Aldridge, Lindsay R.: Costco v. Omega and the First Sale Doctrine, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 12/2011, pp. 325–344.Google Scholar

Allfeld, Philipp: Das Urheberrecht an Werken der Literatur und der Tonkunst, Zweite, vielfach veränderte Auflage, Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 1928.Google Scholar

Alter, Alexandra: Amazon Unveils E-Book Subscription Service, With Some Notable Absences, The New York Times, July 18, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/07/19/business/media/amazon-introduces-kindle-subscription-service.html).Google Scholar

Alter, Alexandra: The World of Books Braces for a Newly Ominous Future, The New York Times, March 16, 2020 (www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/books/coronavirus-impact-publishing-industry-booksellers-authors.html).Google Scholar

Alvarado, Daniela: Seamaster-ing the First Sale Doctrine: A Tripartite Framework for Navigating the Applicability of Section 109(a) to Gray Market Goods, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, pp. 885–925.Google Scholar

Amundsen, Kaitlyn E.: From Your Land to Mine: The Benefits of Applying the First Sale Doctrine to Goods Manufactured Abroad, George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law, Spring 2012, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar

Aplin, Tanya: The ECJ Elucidates the Database Right, Intellectual Property Quarterly, Vol. 2/2005, pp. 204–221.Google Scholar

Apel, Simon: Keine Anwendung der “UsedSoft”-Rechtsprechung des EuGH jenseits von Computerprogrammen – Eine Bestandaufnahme zur Erschöpfung bei “gebrauchten”digitalen Gütern, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8–9/2015, pp. 640–648.Google Scholar

Appl, Clemens, and Schmidt, Marlene: Zweitverwertung gebrauchter Digitalgüter – Die Folgen des UsedSoft-Urteils für Schöpfungen anderer Werkarten, Medien und Recht, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 189–200.Google Scholar

Aragon, Nina: Calculating Artists’ Royalties: An Analysis of the Courts’ Dualistic Interpretations of Recording Contracts Negotiated in a Pre-Digital Age, Cardozo Law Review De Novo, 2017, pp. 180–209.Google Scholar

Arena, Amedeo: The ERTA Pre-emption Effects of Minimum and Partial Harmonisation Directives: Insights from Opinion 3/15 on the Competence to Conclude the Marrakesh Treaty, European Law Review, Vol. 5/2018, pp. 770–779.Google Scholar

Arnerstål, Stojan: Licensing Digital Content in a Sale of Goods Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10/2015, pp. 750–758.Google Scholar

Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI): Report and Opinion on the Making Available and Communication to the Public in the Internet Environment – Focus on Linking Techniques on the Internet, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 149–154.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Benedict, and Fitzgerald, Brian: A Short History of Copyright – The Genie Information, Springer, Cham, 2014.Google Scholar

Außner, Nils W.: Gekaufte Binärdateien klassischer urheberrechtlicher Werke im digitalen Nachlass – Überlegungen zur Vererbbarkeit von Musik-, Film- und E-Book-Dateien, Erbrecht, Vol. 4/2021, pp. 280–289.Google Scholar

Axberg, Robyn: File-Sharing Tools and Copyright Law: A Study of In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation and MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Loyola University Chicago Law Review, Fall 2003, pp. 389–456.Google Scholar

Bäcker, Kerstin, and Michael Höfinger, Frank: Online-Vertrieb digitaler Inhalte: Erstvertrieb, nachgelagerte Nutzungen und nachgelagerte Märkte, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8-9/2013, pp. 623–641.Google Scholar

Bacon, Thomas J.: Caveat Bibliotheca: The First Sale Doctrine and the Future of Libraries after Omega v. Costco, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 11/2011, pp. 414–438.Google Scholar

Bailey, Jonathan: VidAngel: It’s Not About Filtering, Plagiarism Today, January 12, 2017 (www.plagiarismtoday.com/2017/01/12/vidangel-important-case-dont-know/).Google Scholar

Bainbridge, David: Software Copyright Law, 4th ed., Butterworths, London, 1999.Google Scholar

Balderston, Michael: Global Streaming Subs Saw Record Growth in Q3 2020, Finds Strategy Analytics, TV Technology, December 17, 2020 (www.tvtechnology.com/news/global-streaming-subs-saw-record-growth-in-q3-2020-finds-strategy-analytics).Google Scholar

Barbour, Adrienne Clare: Used iTunes: The Legality of ReDigi’s Model for a Second-Hand Digital Music Store, Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Fall 2012, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar

Barfield, Claude E., and Groombridge, Mark A: The Economic Case for Copyright Owner Control over Parallel Imports, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 6/1998, pp. 904–939.Google Scholar

Barker, Emily: The California Resale Royalty Act: Droit de [Not So] Suite, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 2/2011, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar

Barnes, Brooks, and Sperling, Nicole: Studio’s Movies in Theaters Will Be Offered for In-Home Rental, The New York Times, March 16, 2020 (www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/business/media/coronavirus-universal-home-movies.html).Google Scholar

Barrett, Jonathan: An Analysis of Jean-François Millet’s The Angelus and the Origins of Droit de Suite through the Multifocal Lens of Love, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 8/2018, pp. 660–668.Google Scholar

Batchelor, Bill, and Montani, Luca: Exhaustion, Essential Subject Matter and Other CJEU Judicial Tools to Update Copyright for an Online Economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 8/2015, pp. 591–600.Google Scholar

Beck, Gunnar: Judicial Activism in the Court of Justice of the EU, University of Queensland Law Journal, Vol. 2/2017, pp. 333–353.Google Scholar

Beier, Friedrich-Karl: Territoriality of Trademark Law and International Trade, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 1, Vol. 1/1970, pp. 48–72.Google Scholar

Benabou, Valerie Laure: Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in the EU or Shall We Cease Being So Schizophrenic? In: Stamatoudi, Irini (Ed.): New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2016, pp. 351–378.Google Scholar

Bently, Lionel, and Sherman, Brad: Intellectual Property Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 2009.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian: Urheberrechtliche Erschöpfungslehre und digitale Informationstechnologie, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 3/2002, pp. 198–203.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian: Verkehrsfähigkeit “Digitaler Güter”: Zur Dogmatik der Verkehrsfähigkeit von Rechten, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 170–194.Google Scholar

Bice, Scott H.: The Limited Grant of Certiorari and the Justification of Judicial Review, Wisconsin Law Review, 1975, pp. 343–413.Google Scholar

Biehler, Manuel, and Apel, Simon: Anmerking zu OLG Hamm, Urteil vom 15. Mai 2014 – I-22 U 60/13 – Keine Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts bei per Download vertriebenen Hörbüchern, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8–9/2014, pp. 727–729.Google Scholar

Billah, Muhammad Masum: Resale of Digital Works Under Copyright Laws: A Legal and Economic Analysis, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 2018, pp. 123–143.Google Scholar

Bjelke, Harald: The Development of Nordic Copyright in the Light of Court Usage, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 1/1991, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar

Blomqvist, Jørgen: Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014.Google Scholar

Bodewig, Theo: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Takenaka, Toshiko (Ed.): Intellectual Property in Civil Law and Common Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 401–415.Google Scholar

Bodewits, Joke: The Reselling of Second Hand E-Books Allowed in the Netherlands, E-Commerce Law Reports, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

Bodó, Balázs, Gervais, Daniel, and Quintais, João Pedro: Blockchain and Smart Contracts: the Missing Link in Copyright Licensing?, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 4/2018, pp. 311–336.Google Scholar

Bolch, Ben W., Damon, William W, and Hinshaw, C. Elton: An Economic Analysis of the California Art Royalty Statute, Connecticut Law Review, 1978, pp. 689–701.Google Scholar

Bonadio, Enrico: Parallel Imports in a Global Market: Should a Generalised International Exhaustion be the Next Step?, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2011, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar

Borghi, Maurizio: Exceptions as Users’ Rights in EU Copyright Law. In: Rosati, Eleonora (Ed.): The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law, Routledge, 2021, pp. 263–280.Google Scholar

Borghi, Maurizio, Maggiolino, Mariateresa, Montagnani, Maria Lillá, and Nuccio, Massimiliano: Determinants in the Online Distribution of Digital Content: An Exploratory Analysis, European Journal for Law and Technology, Vol. 2/2012, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Bouchè, Gionata: BGH: Uploading a Free-Trial Version of Microsoft Office Is Also Making Available to the Public, Kluwer Copyright Blog, February 20, 2020 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/02/20/bgh-uploading-a-free-trial-version-of-microsoft-office-is-also-making-available-to-the-public/).Google Scholar

Boutsikaris, Constance: Can I Sell My iTunes Library? The Implications of Expanding the First Sale Doctrine to Digital Goods, Landslide, November/December 2015, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar

Bracha, Oren: United States Copyright, 1672–1909. In: Alexander, Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 335–371.Google Scholar

Braun, Thorsten: Schutz geistigen Eigentums contra Berufsausübungsfreiheit am Beispiel der Tonträgervermietung, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8–9/1998, pp. 627–630.Google Scholar

Bräutigam, Peter: Second-Hand Software in Europe – Thoughts on the Three Questions of the German Federal Court of Justice Referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 1/2012, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breagelmann, Tom: Copyright Law in and under the Constitution: The Constitutional Scope and Limits to Copyright Law in the United States in Comparison with the Scope and Limits Imposed by Constitutional and European Law on Copyright Law in Germany, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 27/2009, pp. 99–144.Google Scholar

Brison, Fabienne: The Influence of the Seven First European Directives on Belgian Copyright. In: Janssens, Marie-Christine and Van Overwalle, Geertrui (Eds.): Harmonisation of European IP Law – Contributions in Honour of Frank Gotzen, Bruylant/Larcier, Brussels, 2012, pp. 31–54.Google Scholar

Brooks, Samuel: Battling Gray Markets through Copyright Law: Omega, S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 20/2010, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar

Brown, Ralph S., and Denicola, Robert C.: Copyright – Unfair Competition, and Related Topics Bearing on the Protection of Works of Authorship, 10th ed., Foundation Press, New York, 2009.Google Scholar

Brustein, Joshua: Spotify Hits 10 Million Paid Users. Now Can It Make Money?, Bloomberg Businessweek, May 21, 2014 (www.businessweek.com/%20articles/2014–05–21/why-spotify-and-the-streaming-music-industry-cantmake-money).Google Scholar

Business Insider: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, March 1, 2011 (www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankrupted-anddestroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3).Google Scholar

Bussey, Alexander: The Incompatibility of Droit de Suite with Common Law Theories of Copyright, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 1063–1104.Google Scholar

Büscher, Mareile, and Müller, Judith: Urheberrechtliche Fragestellungen des Audio-Video-Streamings, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 6/2009, pp. 558–560.Google Scholar

Calaba, Victor F.: Quibbles’n Bits: Making a Digital First Sale Doctrine Feasible, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 9/2002, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene: Trademark Exhaustion in the European Union: Community-Wide or International? The Saga Continues, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 6/2002, pp. 47–86.Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene: The United States Supreme Court’s Decision in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons: An “Inevitable” Step in Which Direction?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar

Cameron, Alec: Copyright Exceptions for the Digital Age: New Rights of Private Copying, Parody and Quotation, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 12/2014, pp. 1002–1007.Google Scholar

Capobianco, Gregory: Rethinking ReDigi: How a Characteristics-Based Test Advances the “Digital First Sale” Doctrine Debate, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 35/2013, pp. 391–424.Google Scholar

Capon, Alex: Brexit Deal Retains Artist’s Resale Right as Part of Level Playing Field, Antiques Trade Gazette, January 18, 2021 (www.antiquestradegazette.com/print-edition/2021/january/2476/news/brexit-deal-retains-artist-s-resale-right-as-part-of-level-playing-field/?).Google Scholar

Carrington, Victoria: .ca Domain Names Are Personal Property, World Intellectual Property Review, May/June 2014, p. 81.Google Scholar

Cassiers, Vincent, and Strowel, Alain: Intellectual Property Law Made by the Court of Justice of the European Union. In: Geiger, Christophe, Nard, Craig A. and Seuba, Xavier (Eds.): Intellectual Property and the Judiciary, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018, pp. 175-206.Google Scholar

Challis, Ben: Warner Music Moves to Settle Digital Royalties Class Action, The 1709 Blog, January 9, 2014 (http://the1709blog.blogspot.hu/2014/01/warner-music-moves-to-settle-digital.html).Google Scholar

Chatterjee, I. Neel: Imperishable Intellectual Creations: The Limits of the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 5/1995, pp. 383–425.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Vincent: The Desirability of Agreeing to Disagree: The WTO, TRIPS, International IPR Exhaustion and a Few Other Things, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 21/2000, pp. 333–392.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Vincent: Patent Exhaustion: What’s It Good For?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 51/2011, pp. 101–161.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Vincent: Working toward International Harmony on Intellectual Property Exhaustion (and Substantive Law). In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 125–144.Google Scholar

Chiarizio, Matthew: An American Tragedy: E-Books, Licences, and the End of Public Lending Libraries, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 2/2013, pp. 615–644.Google Scholar

Choderker, Ivy: The First Sale Doctrine Defense as a Limit on the Right of Publicity: Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 19/1998–1999, pp. 413–444.Google Scholar

Cistaro, Mario: The Interface between the EU Copyright Law and the Fundamental Economic Freedoms of Trade and Competition in the Digital Single Market: From the FAPL Case to the Decision, UsedSoft, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar

Clark, Charles R.: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corporation of America: Application of the Fair Use Doctrine under the United States Copyright Acts of 1909 and 1976, New England Law Review, Vol. 15/1979–1980, pp. 661–681.Google Scholar

Coats, William S., Rafter, Heather D., Feeman, Vickie L, and Given, John G: Blows against the Empire: Napster, Aimster, Grokster and the War against P2P File Sharing, Practising Law Institute, Vol. 765/2003, pp. 445–488.Google Scholar

Cohen, Patricia: Lobbyists Set to Fight Royalty Bill for Artists, New York Times, March 23, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/arts/design/auction-houses-taking-no-chances-on-american-royalties-too-act.html).Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Cabletelevision, Satellites and Copyright, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 2–3/1985, pp. 188–195.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Harmonising Intellectual Property Law within the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1992, pp. 622–629.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: The EC Copyright Directives, Economics and Authors’ Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/1994, pp. 821–839.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Prohibition of Parallel Imports through Intellectual Property Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1999, pp. 495–511.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: European Copyright Law – Ever More Horizontal, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/2001, pp. 532–545.Google Scholar

Collins, Maureen B.: Crossing Parallel Lines: The State of the First Sale Doctrine after Costco v. Omega, Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 8/2012, pp. 26–49.Google Scholar

Congdon, Julie S.: Copyright Law – Gray Marketing – The First Sale Doctrine of Copyright Law Closes Another Avenue of Redress, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 34/1989, pp. 597–609.Google Scholar

Cook, Trevor: EU Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.Google Scholar

Corbet, Jan: The Law of the EEC and Intellectual Property, Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol. 13/1994, pp. 327–369.Google Scholar

Corbet, Jan: Transposition de la Directive 2001/29/CE en Belgique, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 4/2005, pp. 5–69.Google Scholar

Corrado, Sean M.: Care for a Sample? De Minimis, Fair Use, Blockchain, and an Approach to an Affordable Music Sampling System for Independent Artists, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 1/2019, pp. 181–244.Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M.: Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford Commentaries on the GATT/WTO Agreements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M., and Correa, Juan I.: Parallel Imports and the Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in Latin America. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 198–225.Google Scholar

Corsello, Kenneth R.: The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990: Another Bend in the First Sale Doctrine, Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 41/1991, pp. 177–209.Google Scholar

Costanza, Nicholas: Digital Music Garage Sale: An Analysis of Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. and a Proposal for Legislative Reform in Copyright Enabling a Secondary Market for Digital Music, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Winter 2015, pp. 135–161.Google Scholar

Covotta, Brian, and Sergeeff, Pamela: ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 1998, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar

Cozine, John C.: Fade to Black? The Fate of the Gray Market after L’anza Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 66/1998, pp. 775–800.Google Scholar

Craig, Carys: The Changing Face of Fair Dealing in Canadian Copyright Law: A Proposal for Legislative Reform. In: Geist, Michael (Ed.): In the Public Interest – The Future of Canadian Copyright Law, Irwin Law, Toronto, 2005, pp. 437–461.Google Scholar

Craig, Carys, and Tarantino, Bob: “An Hundred Stories in Ten Days”: COVID-19 Lessons for Culture, Learning, and Copyright Law, Osgood Hall Law Journal, Fall 2020, pp. 567–604.Google Scholar

Cross, John: Case Note: Mai Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. (9th Cir. 1993), Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1/1994, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar

Cross, John: Case Note: Revisiting the “Shrinkwrap License”: ProCD Inc v. Zeidenberg, Information & Communications Technology Law, Vol. 1/1997, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar

Crowne, Emir: Anything but Tired: The Doctrine of Exhaustion in Canada, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 11/2015, pp. 801–802.Google Scholar

Cuevas, Michel Olmedo: Copyright: Dutch Copyright Succumbs to Aging as Exhaustion Extends to E-Books, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 1/2015a, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar

Cuevas, Michel Olmedo: Hot News: Amsterdam Court of Appeal Gives Tom Kabinet Three Days to Shut Down, The 1709 Blog, January 20, 2015b (http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/hot-news-amsterdam-court-of-appeal.html).Google Scholar

Dannreuther, Anna: Freedom to Contract Prevails: Anyone Can Bear the Cost of the Artist’s Resale Royalty, European Law Reporter, Vol. 1/2015, pp. 2–7.Google Scholar

Davis, Nakimuli: Reselling Digital Music: Is There a Digital First Sale Doctrine?, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 29/2009, pp. 363–373.Google Scholar

Dawson, , Mark, Bruno De Witte, , and Muir, Elise (Eds.): Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013.Google Scholar

de Beer, Jeremy, and Burri, Mira: Transatlantic Copyright Comparisons: Making Available via Hyperlinks in the European Union and Canada, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 2/2014, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar

de Beer, Jeremy, and Tomkowicz, Robert: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights in Canada, Canadian Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2009, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar

Degner, Andrew: Wise-ing Up about the First Sale Doctrine: A Look at the Ninth Circuit’s Approach to Vernor v. Autodesk, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 35/2012, pp. 581–606.Google Scholar

de la Durantaye, Katharina, and Kuschel, Linda: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz – Josef Kohler, UsedSoft, and Beyond, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 195–217.Google Scholar

de la Merced, Michael J.: Pandora, Faded Star of Online Music, Gets Cash Infusion from Sirius XM, The New York Times, June 9, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/06/09/business/dealbook/pandora.html).Google Scholar

Del Mar, Maksymilian, and William, Twining (Eds.): Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, Springer, Cham, 2015. Google Scholar

Derclaye, Estelle: The Legal Protection of Databases – A Comparative Analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.Google Scholar

Desurmont, Thierry: The Author’s Right to Control the Destination of Copies Reproducing His Work, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 4/1987, pp. 2–69.Google Scholar

Determann, Lothar: Digital Exhaustion: New Law from the Old World’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2018, pp. 177–223.Google Scholar

Determann, Lothar, and Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier: Don’t Judge a Sale by Its License: Software Transfers under the First Sale Doctrine in the United States and the European Community, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2001, pp. 1–107.Google Scholar

Determann, Lothar, and Nimmer, David: Software Copyright’s Oracle from the Cloud, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Spring 2015, pp. 161–211.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Askan, and Zimmerman, Robert: Customs Seizure Proceedings in the European Union and the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 276–286.Google Scholar

Dietz, Adolf: The Possible Harmonization of Copyright Law within the European Community, ICC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 10/1979, pp. 395–411.Google Scholar

Dietz, Adolf: The Harmonization of Copyright in the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1985, pp. 379–411.Google Scholar

Dobson, Monica L.: Comment: ReDigi and the Resale of Digital Media: The Courts Reject a Digital First Sale Doctrine and Sustain the Imbalance between Copyright Owners and Consumers, Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 7/2015, pp. 179–211.Google Scholar

Doi, Teruo: Japan: Copyright – Whether Computer Games Are Cinematographic Works – Exhaustion of Distribution Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 9/2002, pp. N147–148.Google Scholar

Donatello, Gary: Killing the Secondary Market: How the Ninth Circuit Interpreted Vernor and Aftermath to Destroy the First Sale Doctrine, Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, Vol. 22/2012, pp. 59–92.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Darren E.: Parallel Trade and International Harmonization of the Exhaustion of Rights Doctrine, Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 2/1997, pp. 445–515.Google Scholar

Donohue, James P.: The Use of Copyright Laws to Prevent the Importation of “Genuine Goods,” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Spring 1986, pp. 183–204.Google Scholar

Dredge, Stuart: Spotify Financial Results Show Struggle to Make Streaming Music Profitable, The Guardian, May 11, 2015 (www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/11/spotify-financial-results-streaming-musicprofitable).Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas: Online and Its Effect on the “Goods” versus “Services” Distinction, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 2/2013, pp. 137–139.Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas, and Leistner, Matthias: Urheberrecht im Internet: die Forschungsherausforderungen, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2013, pp. 887–888.Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas, and Schulze, Gernot: Urheberrechtsgesetz, Vierte Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2013.Google Scholar

DuBoff, Leonard D., King, Christy A., and Murray, Michael D.: Art Law in a Nutshell, 5th ed., West Academic, St. Paul, 2017.Google Scholar

Dutfield, Graham, and Suthersanen, Uma: Pope versus Curll (1741) Revisited: Being a Fair and True Account of the Views of Certain Well-Respected Authors on Publishing, Pyracy and Propertie in the Eighteenth Century. In: Ghosh, Shubha (Ed.): Forgotten Intellectual Property Lore – Creativity, Entrepreneurship and Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar

Dyekjaer, Karen: Internet Sales into the EU of Fake “Replicas,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 7/2014, pp. 550–551.Google Scholar

Eichelberger, Jan: Das urheberrechtliche Verbreitungsrecht (§ 17 Abs. 1 UrhG) nach den Entscheidungen EuGH Peek & Cloppenburg/Cassina und BGH – Le Corbusier-Möbel II, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2011, pp. 403–434.Google Scholar

Eichelberger, Jan: (Wieder-) Ausdehnung des urheberrechtlichen Verbreitungsrechts durch den EuGH?, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 12/2012, pp. 954–959.Google Scholar

Eisnach, Michael: Omega v. Costco: An Unprecedented Decision without Precedent, ABA Section of International Law, International Intellectual Property Newsletter, Spring 2011, p. 4.Google Scholar

Elio, Anthony: The Rise and Fall of Pokémon Go, Innovation & Technology Today, December 5, 2016 (https://innotechtoday.com/rise-fall-pokemongo/).Google Scholar

Elvy, Stacy-Ann: Hybrid Transactions and the Internet of Things: Goods, Services, or Software?, Washington and Lee Law Review, Winter 2017, pp. 77–172.Google Scholar

Espantaleon, Jaime: Exhaustion Light in European Television, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2010, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar

Etherington, Darrell: Apple Patents a System for the Resale and Transfer of “Used” Digital Goods, Techcrunch, March 7, 2013 (http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/07/apple-patents-a-system-for-the-resale-and-transfer-of-used-digital-goods/).Google Scholar

Etienne, Stefan: Microsoft Stops Selling eBooks and Will Refund Customers for Previous Purchases, The Verge, April 2, 2019 (www.theverge.com/2019/4/2/18292177/microsoft-ebooks-refund-stops-selling-digital-books-store).Google Scholar

Evans, Mark, and Prévost, Geneviève: Copyright Licensing Not the Answer to Grey Imports, Managing Intellectual Property, September 2007, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar

Evans, Whitney: 4 Hollywood Studios Sue Utah Movie Editing Service VidAngel, Desert News, June 10, 2016 (www.deseretnews.com/article/865656008/Major-Hollywood-studios-sue-movie-editing-service-VidAngel.html).Google Scholar

Fabian, Ewa: Blockchain, Digital Music and Lex Mercatoria, US-China Law Review, Vol. 12/2017, pp. 852–863.Google Scholar

Fagundes, David: Property Rhetoric and the Public Domain, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94/2010, pp. 652–705.Google Scholar

Fazio, Marie: Forgotten Copy of Super Mario Bros. Sets Record at Auction, New York Times, April 3, 2021 (www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/business/super-mario-bros-nintendo-auction.html).Google Scholar

Feiler, Lukas: Birth of the First-Download Doctrine: The Application of the First-Sale Doctrine to Internet Downloads under EU and U.S. Copyright Law, Journal of Internet Law, October 2012, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

Fennelly, Nial: Rules and Exceptions: Freedom of Movement and Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Hansen, Hugh C (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 5, Juris, Huntington, 2003, pp. 33-1–33-19.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: The Spring 1997 Horace S. Manges Lecture – Copyright for the Digital Era: The WIPO “Internet” Treaties, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Spring–Summer 1997, pp. 197–223. Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties, Their Interpretation and Implementation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms, Publication 891(E), World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Current Issues of Exhaustion of Rights (Kirtsaeng & Quality King, ReDigi v. UsedSoft), Copyright See-Saw, January 28, 2014a (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=55).Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Svensson: Honest Attempt at Establishing Due Balance Concerning the Use of Hyperlinks – Spoiled by the Erroneous “New Public” Theory, Copyright See-Saw Blog, May 4, 2014b (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=63).Google Scholar

Fiegerman, Seth: Netflix Nears 100 Million Subscribers, CNN Tech, April 17, 2017 (http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/17/technology/netflix-subscribers/).Google Scholar

50 Years of the Video Cassette Recorder, WIPO Magazine, November 2006, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

Figliomeni, Marco: The Song Remains the Same: Preserving the First Sale Doctrine for a Secondary Market of Digital Music, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, November 2014, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar

Finck, Michèle, and Moscon, Valentina: Copyright Law on Blockchains: Between New Forms of Rights Administration and Digital Rights Management, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 1/2019, pp. 77–108.Google Scholar

Fischman Afori, Orit: Copyright Infringement without Copying – Reflections on the Théberge Case, Ottawa Law Review, Vol. 1/2007, pp. 25–61.Google Scholar

Frankel, Susy: Tangible Meets the Intangible: International Trade in Intellectual Property. In: Lai, Jessica C and Dominicé, Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 204–224.Google Scholar

Frankel, Susy, and Gervais, Daniel: International Intellectual Property Rules and Parallel Imports. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton: Price Theory, 4th printing, Transaction, New Brunswick, 2008.Google Scholar

Frosio, Giancarlo: It’s All Linked: How Communication to the Public Affects Internet Architecture, Computer Law & Security Review, July 2020, Article 105410.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.: Legal Fictions, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1967Google Scholar

Gadd, Ian: The Stationers’ Company in England before 1710. In: Alexander, Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar

García, Kristelia A.: Copyright Arbitrage, California Law Review, February 2019, pp. 199–266.Google Scholar

Gardner, Eriq: “Weird Al” Yankovic Settles $5 Million Lawsuit against Sony Music, The Hollywood Reporter, December 18, 2013 (www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/weird-al-yankovic-settles-5–666550).Google Scholar

Gaster, Jens: “Obtinere” of Data in the Eyes of the ECJ – How to Interpret the Database Directive after British Horseracing Board Ltd et al. v. William Hill Organisation Ltd, Computer und Recht: International, Vol. 3/2005, pp. 129–135.Google Scholar

Gaubiac, Yves: The Exhaustion of Rights in the Analogue and Digital Environment, Copyright Bulletin, Vol. 4/2002, pp. 2–15.Google Scholar

Gautam, S. Zubin: The Murky Waters of First Sale: Price Discrimination and Downstream Control in the Wake of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29/2014, pp. 717–758.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe: Der urheberrechtliche Interessenausgleich in der Informationsgesellschaft – Zur Rechtsnatur der Beschränkungen des Urheberrechts, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht International, Vol. 10/2004, pp. 815–821.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe: The Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Harmonizing, Creating and Sometimes Disrupting Copyright Law in the European Union. In: Stamatoudi, Irini (Ed.): New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2016, pp. 435–446.Google Scholar

Geiregat, Simon: Digital Exhaustion of Copyright After CJEU Judgment in Ranks and Vasiļevičs, Computer Law & Securities Review, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 521–540.Google Scholar

Geiregat, Simon: Paris Court on digital exhaustion and videogames, The IPKat, October 2, 2019 (https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2019/10/guest-post-paris-court-on-digital.html).Google Scholar

Geiregat, Simon: Digital Exhaustion and Internal Market Law: Tom Kabinet, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 4/2021, pp. 1207–1228.Google Scholar

Geist, Rachel Ann: A “Licence to Read”: The Effect of E-books on Publishers, Libraries and the First Sale Doctrine, IDEA, Vol. 52/2012, pp. 63–100.Google Scholar

Gervais, Daniel J.: Copyright, Culture and the Cloud. In: Pager, Sean A. and Candeub, Adam (Eds.): Transnational Culture in the Internet Age, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2012, pp. 31–54.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Shubha: The Implementation of Exhaustion Policies – Lessons from National Experiences, Issue Paper 40, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Shubha, and Calboli, Irene: Exhausting Intellectual Property Rights – A Comparative Law and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2018.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Shubha, and Mezei, Péter: Elusive Quest for Digital Exhaustion in US and EU: The CJEU’s Tom Kabinet Ruling as Milestone or Millstone for Legal Evolution?, Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 2020, p. 249–275.Google Scholar

Giannopoulou, Alexandra, Quintais, João Pedro, Mezei, Péter, and Bodó, Balázs: The Rise of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and the Role of Copyright Law – Part I, Kluwer Copyright Blog, April 14, 2021 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/04/14/the-rise-of-non-fungible-tokens-nfts-and-the-role-of-copyright-law-part-i/).Google Scholar

Gill, Lex: Law, Metaphor, and the Encrypted Machine, Osgood Hall Law Journal, 2018, pp. 440–477.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C.: Four Reasons and a Paradox: The Manifest Superiority of Copyright over Sui Generic Protection of Computer Software, Columbia Law Review, December 1994, pp. 2559–2572.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C.: Hyperlinking and “Making Available,” European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 147–148.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C., and Treppoz, Edouard: International CopyrightLaw – U.S. and E.U. Perspectives, Text and Cases, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.Google Scholar

Gladwell, David: The Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 12/1986, pp. 366–370.Google Scholar

Glenn, H. Patrick: The Aims of Comparative Law. In: Smits, J. M. (Ed.): Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2006, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar

Göbel, Alexander: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Downloaded Software – The UsedSoft v. Oracle Case [UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corporation, ECJ (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 3 July 2012, C-128/11], European Law Reporter, Vol. 9/2012, pp. 226–234.Google Scholar

Goetzel, Dwayne K.: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Spring 1999, pp. 445–461.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Melissa: A Textbook Dilemma: Should the First Sale Doctrine Provide a Valid Defense for Foreign-Made Goods?, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 80/2012, pp. 3057–3092.Google Scholar

Goldmann, Michael, and Möller, Ralf: Anbieten und Verbreiten von Werken der angewandten Kunst nach der “Le-Corbusier-Möbel”-Entscheidung des EuGH, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 6/2009, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Paul, and Hugenholtz, P. Bernt: International Copyright – Principles, Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar

Gomber, Amit Jyoti S.: First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era. In: Sinha, Manoj Kumar and Mahalwar, Vandana (Eds.): Copyright Law in the Digital World, Springer, Singapore, 2017, pp. 251–277.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Alexis: Why the Supreme Court Said Yes to the First Sale Doctrine in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’anza Research International, Inc., University of Miami Business Law Review, Vol. 8/1999, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

Gotzen, Frank: Distribution and Exhaustion in the EC, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/1990, pp. 299–303.Google Scholar

Graber, Christoph B.: Tethered Technologies, Cloud Strategies and the Future of the First Sale/Exhaustion Defence in Copyright Law, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 4/2015, pp. 389–408.Google Scholar

Graham, Lorie M., and Stephen M., McJohn: Intellectual Property’s First Sale Doctrine and the Policy Against Restraints on Alienation, Texas A&M Law Review, Spring 2020, pp. 497–541.Google Scholar

Granmar, Claes: Intellectual Property Rights and the Single Market, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 4/2011, pp. 321–351.Google Scholar

Gratz, Joseph: Digital Book Distribution – The End of the First-Sale Doctrine?, Landslide, May/June 2011, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Jonathan: Exhaustion and the Alteration of Copyright Works in EU Copyright Law – (C-419/13) Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, ERA Forum, Vol. 17/2016, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar

Grigoriadis, Lazaros G.: The Distribution of Software in the European Union after the Decision of the CJEU “UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp.” (“UsedSoft”), Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 198–205.Google Scholar

Grimmelmann, James: Grimmelmann: Issues in Kirtsaeng “Significant,” Publishers Weekly, March 20, 2013 (www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/56444-grimmelmann-issues-inkirtsaeng-too-signifcant-to-end-with-supreme-court.html).Google Scholar

Grisse, Karina, and Koroch, Stefan: The British Private Copying Exception and Its Compatibility with the Information Society Directive, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 7/2015, pp. 562–569.Google Scholar

Groffe-Charrier, Julie: Diversity of Works in Video Games – Some Thoughts on the Difficulties Inherent in Placing Rights on a Secure Footing, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 1/2021, pp. 47–81.Google Scholar

Grützmacher, Malte: “Gebrauchtssoftware” und Erschöpfungsgrundlehre: zu den Rahmenbedingungen eines Second-Hand-Marktes für Software, Zeitschrift für Urheberund Medienrecht, Vol. 4/2006, pp. 302–306.Google Scholar

Grützmacher, Malte: Endlich angekommen im digitalen Zeitalter!? Die Erschöpfungslehre im europäischen Urheberrecht: der gemeinsame Binnenmarkt und der Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 46–83.Google Scholar

Grützmacher, Malte: Digitale Brüche im Urheberrecht – und ihre Auswirkungen insbesondere bei softwarebasierten hybriden Werken, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 438–439.Google Scholar

Guadamuz, Andres: All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace: A Critical Look at Smart Contracts, Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 6/2019, No. 105338, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Guadamuz, Andres: Can copyright teach us anything about NFTs?, TechnoLlama, March 7, 2021 (www.technollama.co.uk/can-copyright-teach-us-anything-about-nfts).Google Scholar

Guibault, Lucie, and van’t Klooster, Kevin: Netherlands. In: Hilty, Reto M. and Nérisson, Sylvie (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012, pp. 677–718.Google Scholar

Günther, Petteri: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Digital Music in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. and Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi, Inc. Cases, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 205–229.Google Scholar

Haberstumpf, Helmut: Der Handel mit gebrauchter Software im harmonisierten Urheberrecht – Warum der Ansatz des EuGH einen falschen Weg zeigt, Computer und Recht, Vol. 9/2012, pp. 561–572.Google Scholar

Haberstumpf, Helmut: Josef Kohler und die Erschöpfungslehre, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 470–496.Google Scholar

Halpern, Marcelo, Kapgan, Yury, and Yu, Kathy: Vernor v. Autodesk: Software and the First Sale Doctrine under Copyright Law, Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, Vol. 23/2011, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar

Hamborg, Benjamin: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng: The Uncertain Future of the First-Sale Doctrine, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, Vol. 13/2012, pp. 899–924.Google Scholar

Hamilton, David: It’s My Copy and I’ll Sell It If I Want to: Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc., Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 2015, pp. 232–255.Google Scholar

Handley, Lucy: Streaming Services Like Disney+ Aren’t Likely to Make Money “Anytime Soon,” Analyst Says, CNBC, December 9, 2019 (www.cnbc.com/2019/12/09/streaming-services-arent-likely-to-make-money-anytime-soon.html).Google Scholar

Hansen, William R., and Suzanne, M. Morales, M: John Wiles & Sons Case: Limits on the First Sale Doctrine on U.S. Copyright Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/2012, pp. 558–563.Google Scholar

Hanuz, Bianca: Liability Implications of Extending the Communication to the Public Right to Third-party Re-posting of Images Already Freely Available Online with Right Holder Permission, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2019, pp. 190–196.Google Scholar

Harkai, István: Mezei, Péter: Copyright Exhaustion – Law and Policy in the United States and the European Union (Book Review), Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 2019, pp. 577–579.Google Scholar

Harmon, Steph, and Clark, Lucy: Magda Szubanski May Leave Australia If Changes to Book Industry Go Ahead, The Guardian, May 20, 2016 (www.theguardian.com/books/2016/may/20/authors-condemn-book-copyright-and-import-proposal-as-massive-own-goal).Google Scholar

Harris, Keith: For Promotional Use Only: Is the Resale of a Promotional CD Protected by the First Sale Doctrine?, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30/2009, pp. 1745–1772.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Thomas: Weiterverkauf und “Verleih” online vertriebener Inhalte – Zugleich Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 3. Juli 2012, Rs. C-128/11 – UsedSoft./. Oracle, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 11/2012, pp. 980–989.Google Scholar

Hartzler, Matthew H.: Shipping the Old Man across the Sea: The Importation of Books in the Public Domain Abroad, University of Illinois Law Review, 2020, pp. 1007–1043.Google Scholar

Hasik, Daniel, and Łapińska, Anna: The Seizure by Customs Authorities of Counterfeited Goods: The Ruling by the European Court of Justice in Blomqvist v. Rolex and the Changes Brought about by Regulation (EU) No. 608/2013, ERA-Forum: scripta iuris europaei, 2015 pp. 73–87.Google Scholar

Hauck, Ronny: Digitale Inhalte – Verkehrsfähigkeit oder Lizenzketten?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 1/2017, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar

Hauck, Ronny, Hofmann, Franz, and Zech, Herbert: Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 141–148.Google Scholar

Heath, Christopher: Parallel Imports and International Trade, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1997, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar

Helberger, Natali, Huygen, Annelies, and van Eijk, Nico: Ups and Downs – Economic and Cultural Effects of File Sharing on Music, Film and Games, Culture and Science, Economic Affairs and Justice, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper 2012-33, Institute for Information Law Research Paper 2012-27, February 2009.Google Scholar

Helft, Miguel: Netflix to Deliver Movies to the PC, New York Times, January 16, 2007 (www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/technology/16netflix.html).Google Scholar

Helm, Sabrina V., Ligon, Victoria, Stovall, Tony, and Van Riper, Silvia: Consumer Interpretations of Digital Ownership in the Book Market, Electronic Markets, Vol. 2/2018, pp. 177–189.Google Scholar

Hess, Evan: Code-ifying Copyright: An Architectural Solution to Digitally Expanding the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review, March 2013, pp. 1965–2011.Google Scholar

Heun-Rehn, Stefan Lars-Thoren, and Wagner, Eva: Das Folgerecht nach dem Tod des Künstlers – Erste Vorabentscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, European Law Reporter, Vol. 7/2010, pp. 212–218.Google Scholar

Hieger, Barbara: Verletzung von Marken- und Urheberrechten durch Versand rechtsverletzender Ware aus Drittstaat in die EU, Ecolex, Vol. 25/2014: p. 548.Google Scholar

Hill, Brad: Pandora Earnings: Revenue Growth, Gross Profit, Net Loss, and Savaged Stock, Radio and Internet News, October 23, 2015 (http://rainnews.com/pandora-earnings-revenue-growth-gross-profit-net-loss-and-savaged-stock/).Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto M.: “Exhaustion” in the Digital Age. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 64–82.Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto M.: Kontrolle der digitalen Werknutzung zwischen Vertrag und Erschöpfung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2018, pp. 865–880. Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto M., and Nérisson, Sylvie (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz bei Software – Körperliche Übertragung und Folgeprobleme, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 8/2010a, pp. 665–673.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas: Die Online-Erschöpfung im Softwarebereich – Fallgruppen und Beweislast, Multimedia und Recht, Vol. 7/2010b, pp. 447–450.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas, and Försterling, Matthias: Onlinevertrieb “gebrauchter” Software – Hintergründe und Konsequenzen der EuGH-Entscheidung “Used-Soft,” Multimedia und Recht, Vol. 10/2012, pp. 642–647.Google Scholar

Hoffelder, Nate: Used eBook Website Launches in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 19, 2014a (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/19/used-ebook-website-launches-europe/).Google Scholar

Hoffelder, Nate: Used eBook Website Faces Lawsuit in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 27, 2014b (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/27/used-ebook-website-faces-lawsuit-europe/).Google Scholar

Hoffelder, Nate: Publishers Lose First Round of Lawsuit against Used eBook Marketplace, The Digital Reader, July 21, 2014c (http://the-digitalreader.com/2014/07/21/publishers-lose-first-round-lawsuit-used-ebookmarketplace/).Google Scholar

Hofmann, Franz: Grundsatz der Technikneutralität im Urheberrecht? Zugleich Gedanken zu einem more technological approach, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2016, pp. 482–512.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Franz: Recht der digitalen Güter: Keine digitale Erschöpfung bei der Weitergabe von E-Books – Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 19.12.2019 – C-263/18 – NUV u. a./Tom Kabinet Internet u. a. (ZUM 2020, 129), Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 136–138.Google Scholar

Hohmann, Jasmin: Case Note – eBooks: Exhaustion of Distribution Rights and Communication to the Public, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 5/2020, pp. 547–550.Google Scholar

Hojnik, Janja: Technology Neutral EU Law: Digital Goods within the Traditional Goods/Services Distinction, International Journal of Law and IT, Vol. 25/2017, pp. 63–84.Google Scholar

Homar, Philipp: Unzulässigkeit der Weiterveräußerung von E-Books – Schlussfolgerungen aus EuGH C-263/18 – Tom Kabinet, Medien und Recht, Vol. 1/2020, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar

Horowith, Martin L.: Video Games, The Licensing Journal, June/July 2020, p. 27.Google Scholar

Horowitz, David H.: The Record Rental Amendment of 1984: A Case Study in the Effort to Adapt Copyright Law to New Technology, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & Arts, March 1988, pp. 31–72.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert: Post-Sale Restraints and Competitive Harm: The First Sale Doctrine in Perspective, New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 66/2011, pp. 487–547.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, Bernt: Harmonization or Unification of EU Copyright Law. In: Axhamn, Johan (Ed.): Copyright in a Borderless Online Environment, The Institute for Legal Research, 2012, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, Bernt: Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis. In: Pila, Justine and Ohly, Ansgar (Eds.): The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology, Oxford University Press, New York, 2013, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P. Bernt, Quaedvlieg, Antoon, and Visser, Dirk (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012.Google Scholar

Hunnings, N. March (Ed.): Industrial Property Cases from Common Market Law Reports, Common Law Reports Ltd., London, 1973.Google Scholar

Husa, Jaakko: Methodology of Comparative Law Today: From Paradoxes to Flexibility?, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, Vol. 4/2006, pp. 1095–1117.Google Scholar

Hyland, Mark: The Football Association Premier League Ruling – the Bosman of Exclusive Broadcasting Rights?, Communications Law, Vol. 1/2012, pp. 7–13.Google Scholar

IFPI: Global Music Report – Music Consumption Exploding Worldwide, State of the Industry Overview, 2016 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2016.pdf).Google Scholar

IFPI: Global Music Report – Annual State of the Industry, 2017 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2017.pdf).Google Scholar

IFPI: Global Music Report – The Industry in 2019, 2020 (www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Global_Music_Report-the_Industry_in_2019-en.pdf).Google Scholar

Igel, Dominic: Anmerkung zu OLG Frankfurt am Main, Urteil vom 18. Dezember 2012 – 11 U 68/11, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 4/2013, pp. 300–303.Google Scholar

Ikeler, Kim: Sony v. Universal City Studios: Can the Marketplace Relationship between Creator and Consumer Be Preserved?, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 62/1985, pp. 873–897.Google Scholar

Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1982, pp. 415–430.Google Scholar

Ingham, Tim: iTunes: Music, Movie, TV and e-Book Sales Drop 7%, Music Business Worldwide, January 30, 2015 (www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/itunes-music-movie-tv-e-book-sales-drop-7/).Google Scholar

Jankowski, Donald Frank, II: The End of Ownership?, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 14/2013, pp. 103–121.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Georgia: An Extended Doctrine of Implied Consent – A Digital Mediator?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/2021, pp. 706–733.Google Scholar

Joliet, René: Patented Articles and the Free Movement of Goods within the EEC, Current Legal Problems, Vol. 1/1975, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar

Jolly, Ieuan, and Westmoreland, Jill: Case Comment: Can You Sell “Used” Music Purchased on iTunes – the ReDigi Decision, Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 5/2013, pp. 180–182.Google Scholar

Jotzo, Florian: Der EuGH als Interimsnormgeber im digitalen Urheberrecht, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 447–470.Google Scholar

Joyce, Craig P., and Patterson, L. Ray: Copyright in 1791: An Essay Concerning the Founders’ View of the Copyright Power Granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 52/2003, pp. 909–952.Google Scholar

Joyce, Craig P., Leaffer, Marshall, Jaszi, Peter, Ochoa, Tyler, and Carroll, Michael: Copyright Law, 9th ed., LexisNexis, New Providence, 2013.Google Scholar

Jütte, Bernd Justin: Reconstructing European Copyright Law for the Digital Single Market – Between Old Paradigms and Digital Challenges, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2017.Google Scholar

Jütte, Bernd Justin: A Plaidoyer for the Relevance of Copyright Exhaustion, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10/2018a, pp. 838–839.Google Scholar

Jütte, Bernd Justin: Ein horizontales Konzept der Öffentlichkeit – Facetten aus dem europäischen Urheberrecht, UFITA – Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft, Vol. 2/2018b, pp. 354–374.Google Scholar

Jütte, Bernd Justin: Finding the Balance in Copyright Law: Internal and External Control through Fundamental Rights. In: Torremans, Paul (Ed.): Intellectual Property Law and Human Rights, 4th ed., Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2020, pp. 461–484.Google Scholar

Kaczanowska, Agata: DVD, Game & Video Rental in the US, IBISWorld Industry Report 53223, May 2011 (www.ibisworld.com/industry/default.aspx?indid=1370).Google Scholar

Kaiser, Ansgar: Exhaustion, Distribution and Communication to the Public – The CJEU’s Decision C-263/18 – Tom Kabinet on E-Books and Beyond, GRUR International, Vol. 5/2020, pp. 489–495.Google Scholar

Kalimo, Harri, Meyer, Trisha, and Mylly, Tuomas: Of Values and Legitimacy – Discourse Analytical Insights on the Copyright Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Modern Law Review, Vol. 2/2018, pp. 282–307.Google Scholar

Kaltner, Jonathan: Zum EuGH-Urteil “Phil Collins,” Ecolex, Vol. 5/1994, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar

Karapapa, Stavroula: Exhaustion of Rights on Digital Content under EU Copyright: Positive and No Perspectives. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 483–505.Google Scholar

Karjala, Dennis S.: “Copying” and “Piracy” in the Digital Age, Washburn Law Journal, Spring 2013, pp. 245–266.Google Scholar

Karmel, Dan: Off the Wall: Abandonment and the First Sale Doctrine, Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, Spring 2012, pp. 353–378. Google Scholar

Karnell, Gunnar W. G.: Exhaustion of Copyright – Swedish Law in a European Setting, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/1999, pp. 654–660.Google Scholar

Kass, Sean M.: Misinterpreting the Record Rental Amendment: Brilliance Audio v. Haights Cross Communications, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 21/2007, pp. 297–319.Google Scholar

Katz, Ariel: The First Sale Doctrine and the Economics of Post-Sale Restraints, Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, pp. 55–142.Google Scholar

Katz, Ariel, Perzanowski, Aaron, and Rub, Guy A: The Interaction of Exhaustion and the General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes, Virginia Law Review Online, Vol. 102/2016, pp. 8–24.Google Scholar

Katzenberger, Paul: The Droit de Suite in Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 3–4/1973, pp. 361–375.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Anthony: The Vanishing: The Demise of VHS, and the Movies Disappearing Along with It, Museum Moving Image, February 26, 2009 (www.movingimagesource.us/articles/the-vanishing-20090226).Google Scholar

Kawabata, B. Makoa: Unresolved Textual Tension: Capitol Records v. ReDigi and a Digital First Sale Doctrine, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Winter 2014, pp. 33–78.Google Scholar

Keeling, David T.: Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law, Vol. 1, Free Movement and Competition Law, Oxford EC Law Library, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.Google Scholar

Kerber, Wolfgang: Exhaustion of Digital Goods: An Economic Perspective, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 149–169.Google Scholar

Kernochan, John M.: The Distribution Right in the United States of America: Review and Reflections, Vanderbilt Law Review, October 1989, pp. 1407–1438.Google Scholar

Khoury, May: Exhausted Yet? The First-Sale Doctrine and the Second-Hand Market for Software Licenses in the European Union, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 45–57.Google Scholar

Knopf, Howard P.: Parallel Imports & the Internet: Bits, Borders, Barriers & Exhaustion. In: Hansen, Hugh C (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001, pp. 113-1–113-66.Google Scholar

Koehler, Philipp: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz des Urheberrechts im Online-Bereich, C. H. Beck, München, 2000.Google Scholar

Kohler, Joseph: Das Authorrecht – Eine zivilistische Abhandlung, Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1880.Google Scholar

Koktvedgaard, Mogens: The Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in the Law of Intellectual Property, Especially Copyright Law, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/1982, pp. 355–362.Google Scholar

Kon, Stephen, and Heide, Thomas: BHB/William Hill: Europe’s Feist. Court of Appeal Confirmation Establishes Bright Lines, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2006, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar

Korah, Valentine: The Limitation of Copyright and Patents by the Rules for the Free Movement of Goods in the European Common Market, Case Westerne Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 7/1982, pp. 7–45.Google Scholar

Kremen, Hillary A.: Caveat Venditor: International Application of the First Sale Doctrine, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol. 23/1997, pp. 161–185.Google Scholar

Kretsinger, Marilyn J.: Droit de Suite: The Artist’s Right to a Resale Royalty, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Summer 1993, pp. 967–978.Google Scholar

Krüger, Stefan, Biehler, Manuel, and Apel, Simon: Keine “Used Games” aus dem Netz – Unanwendbarkeit der “UsefSoft”-Entscheidung des EuGH auf Videospiele, Multimedia und Recht, Vol. 12/2013, pp. 760–765.Google Scholar

Kur, Annette: Händlerwerbung für Markenartikel aus urheberrechtlicher Sicht – Präsentationsrecht als neue Schutzschranke?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 1/1999, pp. 24–30.Google Scholar

Kuschel, Linda: Zur urheberrechtlichen Einordnung des Weiterverkaufs digitaler Werkexemplare Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 19.12.2019 – C-263/18 – NUV u. a./Tom Kabinet Internet u. a. (ZUM 2020, 129), Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 138–140.Google Scholar

Laddie, Hugh, Prescott, Peter, Vitoria, Mary, Speck, Adrian, and Lane, Lindsay: The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, Vol. 2, Butterworths, London, 2000.Google Scholar

LaFrance, Mary: Global Issues in Copyright Law, West Academic, St. Paul, 2009.Google Scholar

LaFrance, Mary: Using Trademark Law to Override Copyright’s First Sale Rule for Imported Copies in the United States. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 390–407.Google Scholar

Lapatoura, Ioanna: Copyright & NFTs of Digital Artworks, IPKat, March 23, 2021 (https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-post-copyright-nfts-of-digital.html).Google Scholar

Larsson, Stefan: Conceptions in the Code: How Metaphors Explain Legal Challenges in Digital Times, Oxford University Press, New York, 2017Google Scholar

Lauff, Steve: Decompilation of Collective Works: When the First Sale Doctrine Is a Mirage, Texas Law Review, 1998, pp. 869–904.Google Scholar

Lauterbach, Thorsten: Copyright Law Trumps Free Movement of Unlawfully Distributed Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar

Lay, Stacia N.: The First Sale Doctrine in a Digital World?, The Copyright & New Media Law Newsletter, Vol. 4/2013, pp. 3–4, 11.Google Scholar

Lavin, Sean, Klees, Tracey, Lee, Daye, Mah, Scott, Marhsall, Caroline, and Watlington, Ellen: Intellectual Property Crimes, American Criminal Law Review, Summer, 2019, pp. 1101–1149.Google Scholar

Leahy, Brandon: Supreme Indecision: Copyright’s First Sale Doctrine in the Gray Aftermath of Costco v. Omega, Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, Fall 2011, pp. 45–67.Google Scholar

Lee, Yin Harn: UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. (Case C-128/11) – Sales of “Used” Software and the Principle of Exhaustion, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 7/2012, pp. 846–853.Google Scholar

Lee, Yin Harn: United Kingdom Copyright Decisions and Post-Brexit Copyright Developments 2020, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 3/2021, pp. 319–328.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Michael: Digitisation and Copyright Agreements. In: Stamatoudi, Irini A and Paul, L. Torremans, C (Eds.): Copyright in the New Digital Environment: The Need to Redesign Copyright, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2000, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar

Leiss, Ludwig: Verlagsgesetz – Kommentar mit Vertragmustern, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1973.Google Scholar

Leistner, Matthias: Gebrauchtsoftware auf dem Weg nach Luxemburg – Der Vorlagebeschluss des BGH in Sachen Oracle v. UsedSoft, Computer und Recht, Vol. 4/2011a, pp. 209–215.Google Scholar

Leistner, Matthias: “Used” Software before Europe’s Top Court – the German Federal Supreme Court Refers the Oracle v. UsedSoft Case to the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/2011b, pp. 503–506.Google Scholar

Leistner, Matthias, and Antoine, Lucie: Exhaustion and Second-Hand Digital Goods/Contents. In: Heath, Christopher, Sanders, Anselm Kamperman and Moerland, Anke (Eds.): Intellectual Property Rights as Obstacles to Legitimate Trade?, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2018, pp. 159–180.Google Scholar

Lejeune, Mathias: Remarks to USA: No Second Hand Digital Music (Yet), Computer Law Review International, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 88–90.Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A.: Disappearing Content (manuscript), December 29, 2020, pp. 1–36. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3715133).Google Scholar

Leong, Terence: When the Software We Buy Is Not Actually Ours: An Analysis of Vernor v. Autodesk on the First Sale Doctrine and Essential Step Defense, Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, January 2012, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Leval, Pierre: Toward a Fair Use Standard, Harvard Law Review, 1990, pp. 1105–1136.Google Scholar

Lichfield, Gideon: We’re Not Going Back to Normal, MIT Technology Review, March 17, 2020 (www.technologyreview.com/s/615370/coronavirus-pandemic-social-distancing-18-months/).Google Scholar

Lindey, Alexander, and Landau, Michael: Lindey on Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts, 3rd ed., Thomson Reuters, 2016.Google Scholar

Linklater, Emma: UsedSoft and the Big Bang Theory: Is the e-Exhaustion Meteor about to Strike?, JIPITEC, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar

Lipton, Jacqueline: Rethinking Cyberlaw – A New Vision for Internet Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.Google Scholar

Lipton, Jacqueline: Mass Digitization in the Ebook Market: Copyright Protections and Exceptions. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 186–200.Google Scholar

Litman, Jessica: Digital Copyright, Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2006.Google Scholar

Liu, Joseph P.: Owning Digital Copies: Copyright Law and the Incidents of Copy Ownership, William and Mary Law Review, April 2001, pp. 1245–1366.Google Scholar

Loades, D. M.: The Press under the Early Tudors: A Study in Censorship and Sedition, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, Vol. 4/1964, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

Lober, Andreas, Klein, Susanne, and Groothuis, Florian: The Long and Winding Road of Digital Distribution. Or: Why the ECJ’s UsedSoft Decision Is of No Use to Keysellers, Interactive Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 1/2018, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar

Loewenheim, Ulrich (Ed.): Handbuch des Urheberrechts, Vol. 2. Auflage/C. H. Beck, München, 2010.Google Scholar

Long, Doris Estelle: Globalization: A Future Trend or a Satisfying Mirage, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 49/2001, pp. 313–343.Google Scholar

Long, Doris Estelle: Deviant Globalization: The Next Step in the Multilateral Protection of Intellectual Property. In: Weckström, Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013, pp. 49–84.Google Scholar

Long, Henry Sprott, III: Reconsidering the “Balance” of the “Digital First Sale” Debate: Re-examining the Case for a Statutory Digital First Sale Doctrine to Facilitate Second-Hand Digital Media Markets, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 59/2008, pp. 1183–1201.Google Scholar

Longdin, Louise: Making the Most of Article 6: Parallel Importing in Australia and New Zealand. In: Hansen, Hugh C (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001, pp. 112-1–112-38.Google Scholar

Longdin, Louise, Eagles, Ian, and Lim, Pheh Hoon: Sale versus Licence Offline and Online: Can Competition Law Bridge the Doctrinal Gap? Sale versus Licence Offline and Online, International Journal of Law and IT, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 311–333.Google Scholar

Longdin, Louise, and Lim, Pheh Hoon: Inexhaustible Distribution Rights for Copyright Owners and the Foreclosure of Secondary Markets for Used Software, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 5/2013, pp. 541–567.Google Scholar

Loughlan, Patricia: “You Wouldn’t Steal a Car”: Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 29/2007, pp. 401–405.Google Scholar

Lucas, André: Copyright in the European Community: The Green Paper and the Proposal for a Directive Concerning Legal Protection of Computer Programs, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 29/1991, pp. 145–167.Google Scholar

Lunney, Glynn S., Jr.: Copyright’s Price Discrimination Panacea, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Spring 2008, pp. 387–456.Google Scholar

Maclean, Fiona: European Union (CJEU) has delivered its long-awaited decision in UsedSoft v. Oracle International Corp., Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

Maggioni, Ilaria: Kirtsaeng v. Wiley Incentivizes Digital Distribution, les Nouvelles, December 2013, pp. 260–262.Google Scholar

Maher, Imelda: Trade Marks & International Exhaustion, The Bar Review, Vol. 5/2000, pp. 243–246.Google Scholar

Malovic, Nedim: Copyright: Distribution Right Encompasses Advertisement for Sale of Copyright Works, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 12/2015, pp. 895–896.Google Scholar

Marly, Jochen, and Wirz, Anna-Lena: Die Weiterverbreitung digitaler Güter, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Vol. 1/2017, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar

Matthews, Brander: The Evolution of Copyright, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 5/1890, pp. 583–602.Google Scholar

Matulionyte, Rita: Lending E-Books in Libraries: Is a Technologically Neutral Approach the Solution?, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCusker, John, and Menard, Russell R: The Economy of British America, 1607–1789, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1991.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Jeff A.: Recent Copyright Case Law Development, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 5/1997, pp. 293–317.Google Scholar

McInerney, John E., III: California Resale Royalties Act: Private Sector Enforcement, University of Sand Francisco Law Review, 1984, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

McIntyre, Hugh: Spotify Officially Hits 50 Million Paid Subscribers, Forbes, March 3, 2017 (www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/03/03/spotify-officially-hits-50-million-paying-subscribers/).Google Scholar

McJohn, Steven M.: Copyright – Examples & Explanations, Aspen Publishers, New York, 2006.Google Scholar

McKenzie, Elizabeth: A Book by Any Other Name: E-Books and the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 12/2013, pp. 57–73.Google Scholar

Menell, Peter S.: In Search of Copyright’s Lost Ark: Interpreting the Right to Distribute in the Internet Age, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 59/2012, pp. 201–267.Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry: The Wrath of Robert Rauschenberg, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Winter 1993, pp. 103–127.Google Scholar

Meurer, Michael J.: Copyright Law and Price Discrimination, Cardozo Law Review, November 2001, pp. 55–148.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter: The Painter, the One Horn Cow and Ole Hank Wilson’s Back Lot – The Future of Library Digitization in the European Union and Hungary, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 5/2015, pp. 535–562.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter: Enter the Matrix: The Effects of the CJEU’s Case Law on Linking and Beyond, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 10/2016, pp. 887–900.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter: The Doctrine of Exhaustion in Limbo – Critical Remarks on the CJEU’s Tom Kabinet Ruling, Zeszty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego - Prace z Prawa Wlasnosci Intelektualnej (Jagiellonian University Intellectual Property Law Review), Vol. 2/2020a, pp. 130–153.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter: Acquis Communautaire+ The Copyright Aspects of the EU’s Free Trade Agreements. In: Nagy, Csongor (Ed.): World Trade and Local Public Interest – Trade Liberalization and National Regulatory Sovereignty, Springer, Cham, 2020b, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter, and Jütte, Bernd Justin: CJEU Clarifies that Framing Infringes Copyright if TPMs are Circumvented, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 6/2021, pp. 461–463.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter, Quintais, João Pedro, Giannapoulou, Alexandra, and Bodó, Balázs: The Rise of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and the Role of Copyright Law – Part II, Kluwer Copyright Blog, April 22, 2021 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/04/22/the-rise-of-non-fungible-tokens-nfts-and-the-role-of-copyright-law-part-ii/).Google Scholar

Miller, Claire Cain, and Bosman, Julie: E-Books Outsell Print Books at Amazon, The New York Times, May 19, 2011 (www.nytimes.com/2011/05/20/technology/20amazon.html).Google Scholar

Miller, Esti: NAFTA: Protector of National Intellectual Property Rights or Blueprint for Globalization? The Effect of NAFTA on the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/1995, pp. 475–511.Google Scholar

Mills, Mary L.: New Technology and the Limitations of Copyright Law: An Argument for Finding Alternatives to Copyright Legislation in an Era of Rapid Technological Change, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1989, pp. 307–339.Google Scholar

Mohn, Ludwig: Juristische Hilfsbücher für Studium und Praxis, Springer, Berlin, 1919.Google Scholar

Mok, M. Robert: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights: EC-wide or Worldwide? In: Schulze, Reiner (Ed.): Auslegung europäischen Privatrechts und angeglichenen Rechts, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1999, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar

Morgan, Alexandra, Abbott, Paul and Stothers, Christopher: ECJ Rules That the Sale of Second-Hand E-Books Infringes Copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2020, pp. 236–238.Google Scholar

Morris, P. Sean: Beyond Trade: Global Digital Exhaustion in International Economic Regulation, Campbell Law Review, Fall 2013, pp. 107–145.Google Scholar

Mosley, C. Todd: Mourning the Loss of Copyright’s Unsung Hero: Destruction of the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 14/2015, pp. 235–262.Google Scholar

Mount, Dan: A Review of Public Library E-Lending Models, Civic Agenda European Unit, December 2014 (www.bibliotheksportal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/content/bibliotheken/international/Study_Public_Library_ELending_Models_2014.pdf).Google Scholar

Moyse, Pierre-Emmanuel: From Importation to Digital Exhaustion: A Canadian Copyright Perspective. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 478–497.Google Scholar

Mtima, Lateef: So Dark the CON(TU) of Man: The Quest for a Software Derivative Work Right in Section 117, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 70/2008, pp. 1–100.Google Scholar

Mtima, Lateef: The Idea Exclusions in Intellectual Property Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol 3/2020, pp. 343–391.Google Scholar

Mueller-Langer, Frank: Copyright and Parallel Trade. In: Watt, Richard (Ed.): Handbook on the Economics of Copyright – A Guide for Students and Teachers, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014, pp. 287–310.Google Scholar

Mulligan, Deirdre K., and Schultz, Jason M: Neglecting the National Memory: How Copyright Term Extensions Compromise the Development of Digital Archives, Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 4/2002, pp. 451–473.Google Scholar

Muñoz, Rodolphe, Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited. Judgment of 19 March 1998, [1998] ECR I-1251, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 4/1999, pp. 831–839.Google Scholar

Mutimear, Jane: Merck v Primecrown: The Challenge to Merck v Stephar, European Competition Law Review, Vol. 2/1996, pp. 185–188.Google Scholar

Mylly, Tuomas: A Silhouette of Fortress Europe? International Exhaustion of Trade Mark Rights in the EU, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 7/2000, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Mysoor, Poorna: Exhaustion, Non-exhaustion and Implied Licence, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 6/2018, pp. 656–684.Google Scholar

Navarro, Arthur I.: Selected Recent Developments in Copyright, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 3/1995, pp. 107–114.Google Scholar

Naylor, David, and Parris, Emily: After ReDigi: Contrasting the EU and US Approaches to the Re-sale of Second-Hand Digital Assets, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/2013, pp. 487–490.Google Scholar

Newman, Joshua W.: Selling the Right to License: Examination of the First Sale Doctrine Through the Lens of UMG Recordings & Quanta Computer, Journal of Corporation Law, Summer 2010, pp. 849–866.Google Scholar

Ng Boyte, Alina: The Conceits of our Legal Imagination: Legal Fiction and the Concept of Deemed Authorship, Legislation and Public Policy, 2014, p. 707–762.Google Scholar

Nimmer, Melville B., and Nimmer, David: Nimmer on Copyright, Matthew Bender, 2013.Google Scholar

Norman, Helen: Perfume, Whisky and Leaping Cats of Prey: A UK Perspective on Three Recent Trade Mark Cases before the European Court of Justice, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/1998, pp. 306–312.Google Scholar

Norman, Helen: Parallel Imports from Non-EEA Member States: The Vision Remains Unclear, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 4/2000, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar

Norton, Thomas B.: Watch What You *Bleeping* Want: Interpretation of Statutes Dealing with Advancing Technology in Light of the Ninth Circuit Case of Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc., Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Fall 2018, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar

Nowak, Peter: Netflix Launches Canadian Movie Service, CBCNews, September 22, 2010 (www.cbc.ca/news/technology/netflix-launches-canadian-movie-service-1.872505).Google Scholar

Nugent, Annabel: Ed Sheeran’s First-Ever Demo Written Aged 13 Sells for £50,000, Independent, September 9, 2020 (www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/ed-sheeran-first-demo-album-auction-b420874.html).Google Scholar

O’Connor, Sean M.: The Overlooked French Influence on the Intellectual Property Clause, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2015, pp. 733–830.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Sean M.: Distinguishing Different Kinds of Property in Patents and Copyrights, George Mason Law Review, Fall 2019, pp. 205–261.Google Scholar

Oderkerk, Marieke: The Importance of Context: Selecting Legal Systems in Comparative Legal Research, Netherlands International Law Review, XLVIII, 2001, pp. 293–318.Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, Anthony: The Artists’ Resale Right Directive 2001/84: Reflecting upon a Distasteful Encounter of Art and Commerce, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2018, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar

Ohly, Ansgar: Ohly, Ansgar: Unmittelbare und mittelbare Verletzung des Rechts der öffentlichen Wiedergabe nach dem “Córdoba”-Urteil des EuGH, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 10/2018, pp. 996–1004.Google Scholar

Ohly, Ansgar: Anmerkungen zur “Öffentliche Wiedergabe” durch Verkauf “gebrauchter” E-Books – NUV ua/Tom Kabinet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 184–186.Google Scholar

Oliar, Dotan: Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress’s Intellectual Property Power, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94/2006, pp. 1771–1845.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Megan: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, Social Times, March 1, 2011, www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankruptedand-destroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3.Google Scholar

Opri, Debra A.: Video Rentals and the First Sale Doctrine: The Deficiency of Proposed Legislation, Whittier Law Review, Vol. 8/1986, pp. 331–352.Google Scholar

Oprysk, Liliia: “Digital” Exhaustion and the EU (Digital) Single Market. In: Synodinou, Tatiana-Eleni, Jougleux, Philippe, Markou, Christiana, and Prastitou, Thalia (Eds.): EU Internet Law in the Digital Era, Springer, Cham, 2019a, pp. 161–180.Google Scholar

Oprysk, Liliia: The CJEU Judgment in Ranks and Vasilevics: You Can Buy a Used License, but Will a Copy Follow? In: Holm, Cyril (Ed.): Secure Digitalisation. Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics 2016–2018, Poseidon Förlag AB, 2019b, pp. 77–82.Google Scholar

Oprysk, Liliia: Secondary Communication Under the EU Copyright Acquis after Tom Kabinet, JIPITEC, Vol. 2/2020, 200–214.Google Scholar

Oprysk, Liliia, and Sein, Karin: Limitations in End-User Licensing Agreements: Is There a Lack of Conformity Under the New Digital Content Directive?, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 5/2020, pp. 594–623.Google Scholar

Oprysk, Liliia, Matulevičius, Raimundas, and Kelli, Aleksei: Development of a Secondary Market for E-books – The Case of Amazon, JIPITEC, Vol. 2/2017, 128–138.Google Scholar

Overdijk, Tjerd, van der Putt, Polo, de Vries, Eva, and Schafft, Thomas: Exhaustion and Software Resale Rights – A Comparison between the European Exhaustion Doctrine and the U.S. First Sale Doctrine in the Light of Recent Case Law, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 2/2011, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar

Owen, Laura: Like Amazon, Apple Wants to Create a Marketplace for Used Digital Goods, Gigaom, March 8, 2013 (https://gigaom.com/2013/03/08/like-amazon-apple-wants-to-create-a-marketplace-for-used-digital-goods/).Google Scholar

Pagenberg, Jochen: The Exhaustion Principle and “Silhouette” Case, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 1/1999, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar

Pahlow, Louis: Lizenzen als handelbare Güter? Nutzungrecht und Nutzunggegenstand im Softwareverkehr, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 218–238.Google Scholar

Pallante, Maria A.: The Next Great Copyright Act, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 36/2013, pp. 315–344.Google Scholar

Parker, James: Comparing Strategies of the 2d Punic War: Rome’s Strategic Victory over the Tactical/Operational Genius, Hannibal Barca, USAWC Strategy Research Project, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, 2001 (www.iwar.org.uk/military/resources/hannibal/Parker_J_P_01.pdf).Google Scholar

Patry, William: In Praise of the Betamax Decision: An Examination of Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America, South Texas Law Journal, Vol. 22/1982, pp. 211–248.Google Scholar

Patry, William: Copyright Law and Practice, Vol. 2, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, 1994.Google Scholar

Patry, William: Patry on Copyright, Thomson Reuters, 2016.Google Scholar

Patterson, L. Ray, Birch, Stanley F, and Joyce, Craig: A Unified Theory of Copyright – Chapter 2: The Copyright Clause and Copyright History, Houston Law Review, Vol. 46/2009, pp. 215–397.Google Scholar

Pegoraro, Rob: The Paper-to-Pixels Workaround Activists Want to Use to Keep Libraries Online, Forbes, March 27, 2021 (www.forbes.com/sites/robpegoraro/2021/03/27/the-paper-to-pixels-workaround-activists-want-to-use-to-keep-libraries-online/).Google Scholar

Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus: Das Territorialitätprinzip im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht vor dem Hintergrund der technischen Entwicklungen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 1/2006, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, Shira: Resale Royalties for Artists: An Analysis of the Register of Copyrights’ Report, Journal of Copyright Society, 1983, pp. 284–314.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Hoofnagle, Chris Jay: What We Buy When We Buy Now, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, January 2017, pp. 315–378.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: Digital Exhaustion, UCLA Law Review, April 2011, pp. 889–946.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: Legislating Digital Exhaustion, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Symposium 2014, pp. 1535–1557.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: The End of Ownership – Personal Property in the Digital Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar

Peter, Christof: Urheberrechtliche Erschöpfung bei digitalen Gütern, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 6/2019, pp. 490–501.Google Scholar

Petty, M. Elizabeth: Rauschenberg, Royalties, and Artists’ Rights: Potential Droit de Suite Legislation in the United States, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 977–1009.Google Scholar

Pfennig, Gerhard: The Resale Right of Artists (droit de suite), Copyright Bulletin, Vol. 3/1997, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar

Pickton, Miggie: Ebook Price Increases from Three Publishers, Research Support Hub, July 5, 2013 (https://researchsupporthub.northampton.ac.uk/2013/07/05/ebook-price-increases-from-three-publishers/).Google Scholar

Pila, Justine, and Torremans, Pauk: European Intellectual Property Law, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Glasgow, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitell, Lisa R.: Non-transferability of Software Licences in the European Union, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 9/2004, pp. 390–401.Google Scholar

Pope, Alexander B.: A Second Look at First Sale: An International Look at U.S. Copyright Exhaustion, Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 1/2011, pp. 201–230.Google Scholar

Porter, Jon: Spotify Surges Past 300M Users After Successful Russia Launch, The Verge, October 29, 2020 (www.theverge.com/2020/10/29/21539759/spotify-320-million-monthly-active-users-155-subscribers-q3-2020-earnings).Google Scholar

Puig, Antoni Rubí: Copyright Exhaustion Rationales and Used Software – A Law and Economics Approach to Oracle v. UsedSoft, JIPITEC, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar

Quintais, João Pedro: Untangling the Hyperlinking Web: In Search of the Online Right of Communication to the Public, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 5/2018, pp. 385–420.Google Scholar

Racine, Pierre-Luc: Copyright Digital Exhaustion: A Public Interest Approach for the Retransfer of Licensed Digital Content in Canada, Intellectual Property Journal, September 2019, pp. 361–383.Google Scholar

Rahmatian, Andreas: A Comparison of German Moveable Property Law and English Personal Property Law, Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 1/2010, pp. 197–248.Google Scholar

Ramalho, Ana: Copyright Law-Making in the EU: What Lies under the “International Market” Mask?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 208–224.Google Scholar

Raue, Benjamin: Öffentliche Wiedergabe auf Webseite durch Einstellen einer anderweitig zugänglich gemachten Fotografie, GPR - Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union, Vol. 4/2019, pp. 165–167.Google Scholar

Rauer, Nils, and Ettig, Diana: Can E-Books and Other Digital Works Be Resold?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9/2015, pp. 713–716.Google Scholar

Raymond, Art: VidAngel ordered to pay $62 million to Disney, others for copyright infringement, Deseret News, June 17, 2019 (www.deseret.com/2019/6/17/20675845/vidangel-ordered-to-pay-62-million-to-disney-others-for-copyright-infringement).Google Scholar

Reddy, Michael B.: The Droit de Suite: Why American Fine Artists Should Have the Right to a Resale Royalty, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, 1995, pp. 509–546.Google Scholar

Reese, R. Anthony: The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks, Boston College Law Review, March 2003, pp. 577–652.Google Scholar

Rehbinder, Manfred: Urheberrecht, 15., neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2008.Google Scholar

Reimer, Dietrich: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz im Urheberrecht und gewerblichen Rechtsschutz unter Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 6/1972, pp. 221–234.Google Scholar

Reimer, Dietrich: Copyright Law and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1981, pp. 493–511.Google Scholar

Reimer, Dietrich: Principle of Exhaustion of Rights, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/1982, pp. 362–367.Google Scholar

Reinbothe, Jörg: The EC Directive on Rental and Lending Rights and Rights Related to Copyright. In: Jehoram, Herman Cohen, Keuchenius, Petra, and Seignette, Jacqueline (Eds.): Audiovisual Media and Copyright in Europe, Kluwer, Deventer, 1999, pp. 41–51.Google Scholar

Reinbothe, Jörg, and von Lewinski, Silke: The WIPO Treaties 1996 – The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, Commentary and Legal Analysis, Butterworths Lexis Nexis, London, 2002.Google Scholar

Reiner, Richard F.: Home Videorecording: Fair Use or Infringement?, Southern California Law Review, 1978–1979, pp. 573–634.Google Scholar

Reis, Sarah: Toward a “Digital Transfer Doctrine”? The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era, Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, pp. 173–208.Google Scholar

Reischl, Gerhard: Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 13/1982, pp. 415–430.Google Scholar

Rendas, Tito: Lex Specialis(sima): Videogames and Technological Protection Measures in EU Copyright Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2015, pp. 39–45.Google Scholar

Research and Markets: Global E-Book Market Growth, Trends and Forecast (2018–2023): In 2013, E-Books Held 12.3% of Total Books Sales, and the Percentage Is Expected to Rise to 25.8% by the End of 2018, Globe Newswire, December 10, 2018 (www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/12/10/1664294/0/en/Global-E-Book-Market-Growth-Trends-and-Forecast-2018-2023-In-2013-E-Books-Held-12-3-of-Total-Books-Sales-and-the-Percentage-is-Expected-to-Rise-to-25-8-by-the-End-of-2018.html).Google Scholar

Reyburn, Scott: JPG File Sells for $69 Million, as “NFT Mania” Gathers Pace, New York Times, March 11, 2021 (www.nytimes.com/2021/03/11/arts/design/nft-auction-christies-beeple.html).Google Scholar

Richelieu, William: Gray Days Ahead? The Impact of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’anza Research International, Inc., Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 27/2000, pp. 827–859.Google Scholar

Ricketson, Sam: WIPO Study in Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment, Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Ninth Session, Geneva, June 23–27, 2003 (www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_9/sccr_9_7.pdf).Google Scholar

Ricketson, Sam: Proposed International Treaty on Droit de Suite/Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists, Revue Internationale de Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 3/2015, pp. 3–263.Google Scholar

Ricketson, Sam, and Ginsburg, Jane C.: International Copyrights and Neighboring Rights – Berne Convention and Beyond, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.Google Scholar

Riehl, Damien, and Kassim, Jumi: Is “Buying” Digital Content Just “Renting” for Life? Contemplating a Digital First-Sale Doctrine, William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 40/2014, pp. 783–812.Google Scholar

Rigamonti, Cyrill P.: Der Handel mit Gebrauchtsoftware nach schweizerischem Urheberrecht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 43/2009, pp. 14–27.Google Scholar

Rizzuto, Francesco: The European Court of Justice Rules in Tom Kabinet that the Exhaustion of Rights in Copyright Has Little Place in the Age of Online Digital Formats, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Vol. 4/2020, pp. 108–115.Google Scholar

Roa, John C.: Gray Market Goods and the First Sale Doctrine: The Last Nail in the Coffin?, Mississippi College Law Review, Vol. 20/1999, pp. 211–234.Google Scholar

Rognstad, Ole-Andreas: Legally Flawed but Politically Sound? Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in Europe after UsedSoft, Oslo Law Review, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Rosati, Eleonora: Online Copyright Exhaustion in a Post-Allposters World, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9/2015, pp. 673–681.Google Scholar

Rosati, Eleonora: Brexit and Copyright: A Pyrrhic Victory, Intellectual Property Forum, March 2019, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar

Rosati, Eleonora: Ebooks and Mass Digitization Projects: The Role of Licensing. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020a, pp. 201–216.Google Scholar

Rosati, Eleonora: Round-up of CJEU Copyright Decisions in 2019, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2020b, pp. 264–275.Google Scholar

Rosén, Jan: Free Trade, Competition and Copyright: Viewpoints from the Nordic EFTA Countries, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 2/1987, pp. 120–131.Google Scholar

Rothnie, Warwick A.: Parallel Imports, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1993.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Robert H., Evitt, Emily F, and Williams, Matthew: The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, March 2010, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar

Rott, Peter: Download of Copyright-Protected Internet Content and the Role of (Consumer) Contract Law, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 4/2008, pp. 441–457.Google Scholar

Röttinger, Moritz: Copyright and the Rules on the Free Movement of Goods, Revue Internationale de Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 3/1993, pp. 50–127.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: The Economics of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: The Efficiency of a Balanced Approach to the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review Res Gestae, Vol. 81/2013, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: The Unconvincing Case for Resale Royalties, The Yale Law Journal Forum, 2014, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64/2015, pp. 741–817.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: Experimenting with State-Enacted Resale Rights, Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 107/2018, pp. 651–684.Google Scholar

Rubí-Puig, Antoni: Fairness v. Welfare in the Discussion of Copyright Law and Policies: Royalties for the Resale of Artworks as a Case Study. In: Gervais, Daniel J. (Ed.): Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 76–95.Google Scholar

Rucz, Melinda: Does the Doctrine of Exhaustion Apply to Videogames Purchased Digitally? French Court Says Oui, Kluwer Copyright Blog, December 12, 2019 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/12/12/does-the-doctrine-of-exhaustion-apply-to-videogames-purchased-digitally-french-court-says-oui/).Google Scholar

Ruffler, Friedrich: Is Trading in Used Software an Infringement of Copyright? The Perspective of European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 6/2011, pp. 375–383.Google Scholar

Runge, Philipp: Prinzip der gemeinschaftsweiten Erschöpfung im Urheberrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Vol. 21/2006, pp. 666–667.Google Scholar

Rutz, Christian: Germany: Copyright – Exhaustion of Rights and Re-sale of Pre-installed Software, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 6/2009, pp. N48–50.Google Scholar

Sanders, Rick: Will Professor Nimmer’s Change of Heart on File Sharing Matter?, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, Summer 2013, pp. 857–881.Google Scholar

Sang, Yoonmo: Toward Cultural Democracy: Digital First Sale Doctrine and Copyright, Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 221–249.Google Scholar

Sang, Yoonmo: Revisiting Copyright Theories: Democratic Culture and the Resale of Digital Goods, Communication Theory, Vol. 3/2018, pp. 277–296.Google Scholar

Savič, Maša: The CJEU Allposters Case: Beginning of the End of Digital Exhaustion?, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 6/2015a, pp. 389–394.Google Scholar

Savič, Maša: The Legality of Resale of Digital Content after UsedSoft in Subsequent German and CJEU Case Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 7/2015b, pp. 414–429.Google Scholar

Schack, Haimo: Urheber- und Urheber vertragsrecht, Vol. 3, Neubearbeitete Auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2005.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Michael: Legal Issues in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing, Focusing on the Making Available Right. In: Strowel, Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009, pp. 43–70.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Thomas Rainer: Gewährleistung für digitale Inhalte – neuer Vorschlag, alte Probleme. In: Staudegger, Elisabeth and Thiele, Clemens (Eds.): Jahrbuch Geistiges Eigentum 2017, NWV, 2017, pp. 279–314.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Thomas Rainer: UsedSoft ≠ UsedBook – eine Besprechung des EuGH-Urteils “Tom Kabinet,” JusIT – Zeitschrift für IT-Recht, Rechtsinformation und Datenschutz, Vol. 2/2020, no. 5.Google Scholar

Schneider, Jochen, and Spindler, Gerald: Der Kampf um die gebrauchte Software – Revolution im Urheberrecht? – Das Urteil des EuGH vom 3.7.2012 – Rs. C-128/11 – “UsedSoft” Gebrauchtsoftware, Computer und Recht, Vol. 8/2012, pp. 492–493.Google Scholar

Schneider, Marius, and Maillefer, Christophe: How Europe Deals with Private Imports of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2015, pp. 262–268.Google Scholar