Hoile, D., The International Criminal Court: Europe’s Guantánamo Bay? (London: Africa Research Centre, 2010).Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘The “End”, the “Beginning of the End” or the “End of the Beginning”? Introducing Debates and Voices on the Definition of “Aggression”’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 875–82.Google Scholar

Feng, L., ‘Debate and Development of Balancing Activities among Powers’, Diplomacy Comment, 1 (2010), 111–25.Google Scholar

Haili, H. and Honghua, M., ‘Veto Regime and its Future’, Chinese Journal of European Studies, 3 (2005), 14–27.Google Scholar

Jisong, J., ‘The Retroactive Power for ICC to Exercise its Jurisdiction over Crime of Aggression’, Legal Science, 9 (2008), 61–71.Google Scholar

Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), ICJ Reports (2002), 3.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 326 (1973), concerning Zambia, 2 February 1973, UN Doc. S/RES/326.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 387 (1976), concerning Angola and South Africa, 31 March 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/387.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 405 (1977), concerning Benin, 14 April 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/405.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 546 (1984), concerning Angola and South Africa, 6 January 1984, UN Doc. S/RES/546.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 568 (1985), concerning Botswana and South Africa, 21 June 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/568.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 571 (1985), concerning Angola and South Africa, 20 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/571.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 572 (1985) concerning Botswana and South Africa, 30 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/572.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 573 (1985), concerning Israel and Tunisia, 4 October 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/573.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 660 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 2 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/660.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 666 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 13 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/666.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 667 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 16 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/667.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Uniting for Peace, 3 November 1950, UN Doc. A/RES/377 (V).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of South West Africa, 17 December 1965, UN Doc. A/RES/2074 (XX).Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Affirmation of the Principles of International Law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal’, 11 December 1946, UN Doc. A/RES/95(I).Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-seventh Session, 2 May–21 July 1995’, UN Doc. A/50/10.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 326 (1973), concerning Zambia, 2 February 1973, UN Doc. S/RES/326.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 387 (1976), concerning Angola and South Africa, 31 March 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/387.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 405 (1977), concerning Benin, 14 April 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/405.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 546 (1984), concerning Angola and South Africa, 6 January 1984, UN Doc. S/RES/546.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 568 (1985), concerning Botswana and South Africa, 21 June 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/568.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 571 (1985), concerning Angola and South Africa, 20 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/571.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 572 (1985) concerning Botswana and South Africa, 30 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/572.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 573 (1985), concerning Israel and Tunisia, 4 October 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/573.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 660 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 2 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/660.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 666 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 13 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/666.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 667 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 16 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/667.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Uniting for Peace, 3 November 1950, UN Doc. A/RES/377 (V).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of South West Africa, 17 December 1965, UN Doc. A/RES/2074 (XX).Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Affirmation of the Principles of International Law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal’, 11 December 1946, UN Doc. A/RES/95(I).Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-seventh Session, 2 May–21 July 1995’, UN Doc. A/50/10.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 326 (1973), concerning Zambia, 2 February 1973, UN Doc. S/RES/326.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 387 (1976), concerning Angola and South Africa, 31 March 1976, UN Doc. S/RES/387.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 405 (1977), concerning Benin, 14 April 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/405.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 546 (1984), concerning Angola and South Africa, 6 January 1984, UN Doc. S/RES/546.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 568 (1985), concerning Botswana and South Africa, 21 June 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/568.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 571 (1985), concerning Angola and South Africa, 20 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/571.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 572 (1985) concerning Botswana and South Africa, 30 September 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/572.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 573 (1985), concerning Israel and Tunisia, 4 October 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/573.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 660 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 2 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/660.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 666 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 13 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/666.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 667 (1990), concerning Kuwait and Iraq, 16 September 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/667.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Uniting for Peace, 3 November 1950, UN Doc. A/RES/377 (V).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of South West Africa, 17 December 1965, UN Doc. A/RES/2074 (XX).Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Affirmation of the Principles of International Law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal’, 11 December 1946, UN Doc. A/RES/95(I).Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-seventh Session, 2 May–21 July 1995’, UN Doc. A/50/10.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1984), 392.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United States of America), Provisional Measures, Order 14 April 1992, ICJ Reports (1992), 114.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Sixth Session, 2 May–22 July 1994’, UN Doc. A/49/10, Yb ILC (1994) vol. II(2) 1.Google Scholar

Ambos, K., Internationales Strafrecht: Strafanwendungsrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, Rechtshilfe (Munich: Beck, 2011).Google Scholar

Werle, G., Völkerstrafrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 3rd ed. 2012).Google Scholar

Fink, U., ‘Artikel 26’, in von Mangoldt, H., Klein, F. and Starck, C. (eds.), Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Band 2 (Munich: Franz Vahlen, 2010), 533–56.Google Scholar

Laufhütte, H. W., ‘§ 80: Vorbereitung eines Angriffskrieges’, in Jähnke, B., Laufhütte, H. W. and Odersky, W. (eds.), Leipziger Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, Band 4 (Berlin: De Gruyter Recht, 2007), 19–30.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A., ‘Article 5: Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’, in Triffterer, O. and Ambos, K. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Munich: Beck, Hart, and Nomos, 3rd ed. 2016), 111–26.Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression nach Kampala’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (2010), 649–68.Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Der Kompromiss von Kampala zum Verbrechen der Aggression: Ein Blick aus der Verhandlungsperspektive’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (2010), 644–48.Google Scholar

Blokker, N. and Kreß, C., ‘A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, M., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2010), 71–114.Google Scholar

Heinsch, R., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future?’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 713–43.Google Scholar

Kaul, H. P., ‘Kampala June 2010: A First Review of the ICC Review Conference’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 649–67.Google Scholar

Kinkel, K., ‘Für einen funktionsfähigen Weltstrafgerichtshof’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (1997), 2860–861.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression before the First Review of the International Criminal Court Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 851–65.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1129–146.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘Der Kompromiss von Kampala über das Verbrechen der Aggression’, Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht (2011), 65–94.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘The International Criminal Court’s Exercise of Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression – at Last … in Reach … over Some’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 745–89.Google Scholar

Safferling, C. and Kirsch, S., ‘Zehn Jahre Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, Juristische Arbeitsblätter (2012), 481–87.Google Scholar

Scharf, M., ‘Universal Jurisdiction and the Crime of Aggression’, Harvard International Law Journal, 53 (2012), 358–89.Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, K., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof: Ein politischer Erfolg mit rechtlichen Untiefen’, Juristen Zeitung (2010), 745–52.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Zehn Jahre Internationaler Strafgerichtshof’, Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift, 39 (2012), 673–81.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B., ‘Par in Parem Imperium Non Habet: Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 133–64.Google Scholar

Werle, G., ‘Völkerstrafrecht und deutsches Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, Juristen Zeitung (2012), 373–80.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A., ‘The Creation of a Permanent International Criminal Court’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 2 (1998), 169–237.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A., ‘Amending the Amendment Provisions of the Rome Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 209–27.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B., Defining International Aggression (2 vols., New York: Oceana, 1975).Google Scholar

United Nations, Historical Review of Developments Relating to Aggression (New York: United Nations, 2003).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Grover, L., ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 517–33.Google Scholar

Boas, A. T., ‘The Definition of the Crime of Aggression and its Relevance for Contemporary Armed Conflict’, International Crimes Database, Brief 1, June 2013.Google Scholar

Communiqué of the Ministerial Meeting of the Coordinating Bureau of the Non-Aligned Movement, Cartagena De Indias, Colombia, 19–20 May 1998, available at: http://southmovement.alphalink.com.au/southnews/cartagena98.html.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., ‘Aggression’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (updated May 2009).Google Scholar

Final Document of the 15th NAM Summit Meeting held at Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt, in July 2009, available at: http://cns.miis.edu/nam/documents/Official_Document/15Summit-Final-_Compiled.pdf.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 6th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 295th Meeting, 22 January 1952, GAOR A/C.6/SR.295.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 7th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 341st Meeting, 4 December 1952, GAOR A/C.6/SR.341.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 12th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 520th Meeting, 22 October 1957, GAOR A/C.6/SR.520.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 12th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 530th Meeting, 6 November 1957, GAOR A/C.6/SR.530.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 12th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 535th Meeting, 18 November 1957, GAOR A/C.6/SR.535.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 22nd Session [Summary Record], 1618th Plenary Meeting, 4 December 1967.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 23rd Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1078th Meeting, 22 November 1968, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1078.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 25th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1162nd Meeting, 26 October 1970, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1162.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 26th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1274th Meeting, 3 November 1971, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1274.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 27th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1350th Meeting, 3 November 1972, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1350.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 28th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1442nd Meeting, 20 November 1973, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1442.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 29th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1478th Meeting, 16 October 1974, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1478.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 29th Session [Summary Record], Sixth Committee, 1478th Meeting, 16 October 1974, GAOR A/C.6/SR.1478.Google Scholar

Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 4611, Answered on 18 April 2001, available at: http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/psearch/QResult13.aspx?qref=30416.Google Scholar

Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2918, Answered on 18 August 2004, available at: http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/psearch/QResult14.aspx?qref=2854.Google Scholar

Barriga, S., Danspeckgruber, W. and Wenaweser, C. (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression: Materials of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, 2003–2009 (Princeton, NJ: Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination, 2009).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Broms, B., The Definition of Aggression in the United Nations (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1968).Google Scholar

May, L., Aggression and Crimes against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Rajaee, F. (ed.), The Iran–Iraq War: The Politics of Aggression (Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1993).Google Scholar

Rajaee, F. (ed.), Iranian Perspectives on the Iran–Iraq War (Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1997).Google Scholar

Tzanakopoulos, A., Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. CLIV (374 vols., Leiden and Boston: Brill and Nijhoff, 1977), 299–400.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., Barriga, S., Grover, L. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘Negotiating the Understandings on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 81–98.Google Scholar

Abtahi, H., ‘The Islamic Republic of Iran and the ICC’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3 (2005), 635–48.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., ‘The United Nations Consensus Definition of Aggression: Sieve or Substance’, Journal of International Law and Economics, 10 (1975), 701–24.Google Scholar

Greegan, E., ‘Justified Uses of Force and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 59–82.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘The Uncertain Legal Status of the Aggression Understandings’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 229–48.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Nsereko, D. D. N., ‘Aggression under the Rome Statute of the ICC’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 71 (2002), 497–521.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189–207.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘Second Thought on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar

Politi, M., ‘The ICC and the Crime of Aggression: A Dream that Came Through and the Reality Ahead’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 267–88.Google Scholar

Reddi, V. J., ‘The ICC and the Crime of Aggression: A Need to Reconcile the Prerogatives of the SC, the ICC and the ICJ’, International Criminal Law Review, 8 (2008), 655–86.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Oil Platform (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (2003), 161.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., Statement to the United Nations General Assembly Thematic Dialogue on the Responsibility to Protect, United Nations, New York, 23 July 2009, available at: www.un.org/ga/president/63/interactive/protect/noam.pdf, last accessed 23 September 2015.Google Scholar

Convention for the Definition of Aggression (adopted 3 July 1933, entered into force 17 February 1934), 147 LNTS 69, No. 3391.Google Scholar

Declaration of Howard Teicher, Case No. 93-241-CR-HIGHSMITH (United States District Court: Southern District Florida), 31 January 1995, available at: www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/iraq61.pdf, last accessed 23 September 2015.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Needs to Expedite the Drafting of a Definition of Aggression in the Light of the Present International Situation, 18 December 1967, UN Doc. A/Res/2330 (XXII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 20 December 1952, UN Doc. A/Res/688 (VII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Properties, 2 December 2004, UN Doc. A/RES/38.Google Scholar

Groves, S., ‘The US Should Reject the “UN Responsibility to Protect”’, The Heritage Foundation, 1 May 2008, available at: www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/bg2130.cfm, last accessed 23 January 2012.Google Scholar

Intervention by the Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran during the Informal Intersessional Meeting on the Crime of Aggression, Princeton Club, New York, 8–10 June 2009 (on file with the authors).Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. (Legal Advisor to the US State Department), Statement Regarding the Crime of Aggression at the Resumed Eighth Session of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court, 23 March 2010, available at: http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/139000.htm.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 479 (1980) concerning the situation between Iran and Iraq, 28 September 1980, UN Doc. S/Res/479.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 514 (1982) concerning the situation between Iran and Iraq, 12 July 1982, UN Doc. S/RES/514.Google Scholar

Statement by Momtaz, Djamchid, Legal Adviser of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran, during the General Debate of the Kampala Review Conference, 1 June 2012 (on file with the co-authors), available at: www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/RC2010/Statements/ICC-RC-gendeba-Iran-ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

Statement by Samy, H. E. Mahmoud, Ambassador of the Arab Republic of Egypt to the Hague on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement before the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, available at: www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/RC2010/Statements/ICC-RC-gendeba-NAM-ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

Statement of the Representative of Iran at the Sixth Committee, Official Records of the General Assembly, 29th Session, Supplement No. 19 (A/9619), at 88.Google Scholar

Becker, T., Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility (Oxford: Hart, 2006).Google Scholar

Cassese, A. and Gaeta, P. (eds.), Cassese’s International Criminal Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Franck, T., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Green, J. A., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

Lie, T., In the Cause of Peace: Seven Years with the United Nations (New York: Macmillan, 1954).Google Scholar

Shaw, M., International Law, 6th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus: United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Enker, A., ‘Law of the Pursuer’, in Ben-Menahem, H., Edrei, A. and Hecht, N. S. (eds.), Windows onto Jewish Legal Culture: Fourteen Exploratory Essays, vol. I (2 vols., London: Routledge, 2011), 266–320.Google Scholar

Jennings, R. Y., ‘International Force and the International Court of Justice’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 323–35.Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘International Courts and Tribunals, Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Inter-State Applications’ (last updated March 2006), in Wolfrum, Rudiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008) (online edition).Google Scholar

Rubin, A. R., ‘The International Criminal Court: A Skeptical Analysis’, in Schmitt, M. N. (ed.), International Law across the Spectrum of Conflict: Essays in Honor of Professor L. C. Green on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday (Newport, RI: Naval War College, 2000), 421–38.Google Scholar

Wilmshurst, E., ‘Definition of the Crime of Aggression: State Responsibility or Individual Criminal Responsibility?’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Farnham: Ashgate, 2004), 93–96.Google Scholar

Wilmshurst, E., ‘Aggression’, in Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E. (eds.), An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2010), 312–33.Google Scholar

Akande, D., ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1(3) (2003), 618–50.Google Scholar

Akande, D., ‘The Contribution of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the Use of Force’, EJIL:Talk! (18 November 2011), available at: www.ejiltalk.org.Google Scholar

Bethlehem, D., ‘Self-Defense Against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors’, American Journal of International Law, 106 (2012), 770–77.Google Scholar

Beytenbrod, S., ‘Defining Aggression: An Opportunity to Curtail the Criminal Activities of Non-State Actors’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36 (2011), 647–91.Google Scholar

Blum, Y., ‘Economic Boycotts in International Law’, Texas International Law Journal, 12 (1977), 5–16.Google Scholar

Creegan, E., ‘Justified Uses of Force and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(1) (2012), 59–82.Google Scholar

Davidson, O., ‘A Legal Analysis of Computer Network Attacks Under International Law’, Israel Defense Forces Law Review, 3 (2007–8), 70–111.Google Scholar

Gleditsch, N. P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M. and Strand, H., ‘Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research, 39(5) (2002), 615–37.Google Scholar

Lapidoth, R., ‘The Security Council in the May 1967 Crisis: A Study in Frustration’, Israel Law Review, 4 (1969), 534–50.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Israel’s Acceptance of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, Israel Law Review, 4(3) (1969), 307–32.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Ideal to Law to Practice: The Universal Declaration Today and Tomorrow’, Pace International Law Review, 11 (1999), 89–94.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Defining Aggression for the International Criminal Court’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 25(1) (2001–2), 1–15.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Reflections on the Prosecution of War Crimes by International Tribunals’, American Journal of International Law, 100 (2006), 551–79.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘On the Definition of Aggression’, International Problems, 15 (1976), 25–34.Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘On Defining International Aggression: An Exercise in Futility’, Israel Law Review, 12 (1977), 401–5.Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘State Responsibility and International Crimes: Further Reflections on Article 19 of the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 30 (1997–98), 145–66.Google Scholar

Schondorf, R., ‘Extra-State Armed Conflict: Is there a Need for a New Legal Regime?’, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 37 (2004), 1–78.Google Scholar

Sofaer, A. D., ‘The Best Defense? Preventive Force and International Security’, Foreign Affairs, 89 (2010), 109–18.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Conceptualizing Aggression’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20 (2009), 1–68.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran), ICJ Reports (1980), 3.Google Scholar

Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania), ICJ Reports (1949), 18.Google Scholar

East Timor case (Portugal v. Australia), ICJ Reports (1995), 90.Google Scholar

High Court of Justice 3451/02, Almandi and Others v. Minister of Defence and Others, available at: www.court.gov.il.Google Scholar

High Court of Justice 6204/06, Beilin v. Prime Minister, available at: www.court.gov.il.Google Scholar

Interpretation of Peace Treaties (Advisory Opinion), 30 March 1950, ICJ Reports (1950), 65.Google Scholar

Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, Award, PCA, International Law Reports, 119 (2001), 566–98.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Monetary Gold case (Italy v. France, United Kingdom, and United States), ICJ Reports (1954), 19.Google Scholar

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), ICJ Reports (1974), 253.Google Scholar

Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France), ICJ Reports (1974), 457.Google Scholar

Status of Eastern Carelia (Advisory Opinion), PCIJ (1923), Series B, No. 5.Google Scholar

Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1975), 12.Google Scholar

Abuja Non-Aggression and Common Defence Pact (2005), adopted by the African Union.Google Scholar

Akande, D., ‘Prosecuting Aggression: The Consent Problem and the Role of the Security Council’, Working Paper (May 2010).Google Scholar

Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1997/42, concerning Human Rights and Terrorism, 11 April 1997, E/CN.4/RES/1997/42.Google Scholar

Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Analytical Paper Prepared Pursuant to the Request Contained in Paragraph 256 of the Report of the Commission on the Work of its Thirty-Fourth Session, 25 March 1983, A/CN.4/365.Google Scholar

General Assembly, 22nd Session [Provisional Verbatim Records], 1566th Plenary Meeting, 25 September 1967, GAOR A/22/PV.1566.Google Scholar

Press Release, ‘Legal Prosecution of Aggression Required Agreed Definition, Preparatory Committee on the International Criminal Court Told’, 27 March 1996, UN Doc. L/2765.Google Scholar

Protocol on Non-Aggression and Mutual Defence in the Great Lakes Region (2006).Google Scholar

‘Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change’, UN Doc. A/59/565 (2004).Google Scholar

‘Report of the Working Group on Amendments’, 9 December 2011, ICC-ASP/10/32.Google Scholar

‘Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Kampala, Uganda, 31 May–11 June 2010, Review Conference Official Records.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 405 (1977) concerning Benin, 14 April 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/405.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 419 (1977) concerning Benin, 24 November 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/419.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 1368 (2001) concerning Threats to International Peace and Security caused by Terrorist Acts, 12 September 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1368.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) concerning Threats to International Peace and Security caused by Terrorist Acts, 28 September 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1373.Google Scholar

Statement on the US Withdrawal from the Proceedings Initiated by Nicaragua in the International Court of Justice, US Department of State Statement, 18 January 1985.Google Scholar

United Nations Treaty Series, vols. 108, 252 and 1349.Google Scholar

Vesterdahl, M., ‘Re-Defining the “Crime of Aggression”: The Evolution of an Outdated Ideal to Include Non-State Actors’ (February 2010), available at: http://works.bepress.com/matthew_vesterdahl/1.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Fujita, H., What are War Crimes? (Senso Hanzai towa Nanika?) (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Grover, L., ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 517–33.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Mayama, A., ‘The Crime of Aggression in the Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Consent-Based Jurisdictional Regime and the Issue of Selectivity’, Journal of International Law and Diplomacy, 109 (2011), 543–75.Google Scholar

Politi, M., ‘The ICC and the Crime of Aggression: A Dream that Came through and the Reality Ahead’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 267–88.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A., ‘Amending the Amendment Provisions of the Rome Statute: The Kampala Conference on the Crime of Aggression and the Law of Treaties’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 209–27.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Declaration RC/Decl.2, ‘Declaration on Cooperation’, 8 June 2010, in Review Conference Official Records, RC/11, part II, 25.Google Scholar

Resolution ICC-ASP/5/Res.4, ‘Programme Budget for 2007, the Working Capital Fund for 2007, Scale of Assessments for the Apportionment of Expenses of the International Criminal Court and Financing Appropriations for the Year 2007’, 1 December 2006, in Review Conference Official Records, ICC-ASP/5/32, part III, 383.Google Scholar

Resolution ICC-ASP/10/Res.5, ‘Strengthening the International Criminal Court and the Assembly of States Parties’, 21 December 2011, in Review Conference Official Records, ICC-ASP/10/20, part III, 28.Google Scholar

Resolution ICC-ASP/4/Res.8, ‘Programme Budget for 2006, the Working Capital Fund for 2006, Scale of Assessments for the Apportionment of Expenses of the International Criminal Court and Financing Appropriations for the Year 2006’, 3 December 2005, in Review Conference Official Records, ICC-ASP/4/32, part III, 350.Google Scholar

Review Conference Pledges, RC/9, 15 July 2010, available at: www.icc-cpi.int.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Boyle, F. A., The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 1989).Google Scholar

Boyle, F. A., Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations, 1898–1922 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Dive, G., Goes, B. and Vandermeersch, D., From Rome to Kampala: The First 2 Amendments to the Rome Statute (Brussels: Bruylant, 2012).Google Scholar

Kim, Y. S., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary of the Rome Statute (Chapel Hill, NC: Wisdom House, 2010).Google Scholar

Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination (ed.), Handbook on the Ratification and Implementation of the Kampala Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Princeton, NJ: Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination at Princeton University, 2012).Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B., Cases on United Nations Law (Brooklyn, NJ: Foundation Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court considered at the first Review Conference on the Court, Kampala, 31 May–11 June 2010’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 689–711.Google Scholar

Heinsch, R., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future?’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 713–43.Google Scholar

Kaul, H-P., ‘Kampala June 2010: A First Review of the ICC Review Conference’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 649–67.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. S., ‘Responsibility to Protect, Humanitarian Intervention and North Korea’, Journal of International Business and Law, 5 (2006), 74–94.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. S., ‘The Korean Implementing Legislation on the ICC Statute’, Chinese Journal of International Law, 10 (2011), 161–70.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

‘Certain Expenses of the United Nations’, ICJ Reports (Advisory Opinion), 20 July 1962, 151, reprinted in American Journal of International Law, 56 (1962), 1053.Google Scholar

Editorial, ‘Risky Nationalism in Japan’, New York Times, 26 December 2013.Google Scholar

‘Final Report of the Special Rapporteur of the Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery, on Systematic Rape, Sexual Slavery and Slavery-Like Practices During Armed Conflict’, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub. 2/1998/13.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Uniting for Peace’ Resolution, 3 November 1950, UN Doc. 377 (V) A (1950).Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), IAEA Fact Sheet, 05-24291/FS Series 1/01 Rev.1/E.Google Scholar

Office of the Prosecutor, ‘Report on Preliminary Examination Activities 2013’, 25 November 2013.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 82 (1950) concerning Korea, 25 June 1950, UN Doc. S/1501.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 83 (1950) concerning Korea, 27 June 1950, UN Doc. S/1511.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 84 (1950) concerning Korea, 7 July 1950, UN Doc. S/1588.Google Scholar

Tabuchi, H., ‘With Shrine Visit, Leader Asserts Japan’s Track From Pacifism’, New York Times, 26 December 2013.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bass, G. J., Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals (Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Documentary History (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 1998).Google Scholar

Bergsmo, M. (ed.), Quality Control in Fact-Finding (Florence: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2013).Google Scholar

Berlin, I., The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy’s View of History (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1953; 2nd edn Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Black, H. C. and Nolan, J. R. (eds.), Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence Ancient and Modern, 6th edn (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1993).Google Scholar

Clark, C., The Sleepwalkers: How Europe went to War in 1914 (London: Allen Lane, 2012).Google Scholar

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Droz, J., Les causes de la Première Guerre Mondiale: Essai d’historiographie (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1973).Google Scholar

Duguit, L., L’Etat, le droit objectif et la loi positive (Paris: Fontemoing, 1901).Google Scholar

Duguit, L., Traité de droit constitutionnel (5 vols., Paris: Fontemoing, 1911–25) (re-edited by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in 1972).Google Scholar

Elster, J., Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Fischer, F., Griff nach der Weltmacht. Die Kriegszielpolitik des kaiserlichen Deutschlands 1914–1918 (Dusseldorf: Droste, 1961).Google Scholar

Fromkin, D., Europe’s Last Summer, Who Started the Great War in 1914? (New York: Knopf, 2004).Google Scholar

Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Huber, M., Die soziologischen Grundlagen des Völkerrechts (The Sociological Foundations of International Law) (Berlin: Rothschild, 1928).Google Scholar

Kennedy, P., The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism (London: Allen & Unwin, 1980).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press, 1933; reprinted by the Lawbook Exchange, 2000).Google Scholar

Lesaffer, R. (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993).Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Law Series, 1978, reprinted 2003).Google Scholar

Maturana, H. and Varela, F., The Tree of Knowledge. Biological Basis of Human Understanding (Boston, MA: Shambala, 1987; rev. edn 1992).Google Scholar

Moore, J. B., Digest of International Law, vol. II (8 vols., Washington: Government Printing Office, 1906).Google Scholar

Neff, S. C., War and the Law of Nations: A General History (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Parsons, T., The Social System (New York: Free Press, 1951).Google Scholar

Prideaux, S., Edvard Munch: Behind the Scream (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Renouvin, P., Les Origines immédiates de la guerre 28 juin–4 août 1914 (Paris: A. Costes, 1925).Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P., La mémoire, l’histoire et l’oubli (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 2000).Google Scholar

Scelle, G., Précis de droit des gens (2 vols., Paris: Sirey, 1932, 1934; vol. I reprinted by Dalloz, Paris, 2008, with a presentation by Carlo Santulli).Google Scholar

Schiffbauer, B., Vorbeugende Selbstverteidigung im Völkerrecht, Eine Systematische Ermittlung des gegenwärtigen friedenssicherungsrechtlichen Besitzstandes aus völkerrechtsdogmatischer und praxisanalytischer Sicht (Preventive Self-defense in International Law: A Systematic Investigation of the Current Peacekeeping Law Acquis from the Perspectives of Dogmatic International Law and the Analysis of Practice) (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2012).Google Scholar

Taylor, A. J. P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe 1848–1918 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Diggelmann, O., ‘Georges Scelle (1878–1961)’, in Fassbender, B. and Peters, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), 1162–66.Google Scholar

Fife, R. E., ‘Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States’, in Bergsmo, M. (ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden. Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), 53–73.Google Scholar

Gaurier, D., ‘Cosmopolis and Utopia’, in Fassbender, B. and Peters, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), 250–71.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘Lawfare and Warfare’, in Crawford, J. and Koskenniemi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 158–83.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P. and Robinson, D., ‘Reaching Agreement at the Rome Conference’, in Cassese, A., Gaeta, P. and Jones, J. R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2002), 67–91.Google Scholar

Munch, E., ‘The Sun’, in Woll, G., Edvard Munch: The Complete Paintings. Catalogue Raisonné, vol. 3 (1909–1920), Catalogue No. 970 (2008), 962–63.Google Scholar

Nouwen, S., ‘Justifying Justice’, in Crawford, J. and Koskenniemi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 327–51.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘International Adjudication’, in Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), 207–24.Google Scholar

Schmoeckel, M., ‘Consent and Caution: Lassa Oppenheim and his Reaction to World War I’, in Lesaffer, R. (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 270–88.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘The 1871 Peace Treaty between France and Germany and the 1919 Peace Treaty of Versailles’, in Lesaffer, R. (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 382–96.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S., ‘Twilight of Sovereignty or the Emergence of Cosmopolitan Norms? Rethinking Citizenship in Volatile Times’, Citizenship Studies, 11(1) (2007), 19–36.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., ‘Die Paradoxie des Entscheidens’, Verwaltungsarchiv, 84 (1993), 287–310.Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., ‘Law as Institutional Fact’, 1973 Edinburgh University Inaugural Lecture, No. 52, Law Quarterly Review, 90 (1974), 102–29.Google Scholar

Thierry, H., ‘The Thought of Georges Scelle’, European Journal of International Law, 1 (1990), 193–209.Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Reports (2007), 43.Google Scholar

Bensouda, F., Prosecutor, International Criminal Court, Statement following an Application Seeking an Adjournment of the Provisional Trial Date Due to Changes in the State of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11, 19 December 2013, available at: www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/structure%20of%20the%20court/office%20of%20the%20prosecutor/reports%20and%20statements/statement/Pages/otp-statement-19-12-2013.aspx, last accessed 19 December 2013.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania), ICJ Reports (1949), 18.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Carmel Agius, ICTY-06-90-A, 16 November 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Simatović, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Michèle Picard, ICTY-03-69-T, 30 May 2013.Google Scholar

General Assembly, ‘Affirmation of the Principles of International Law Recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal’, 11 December 1946, GA Res. 95 (I).Google Scholar

‘Historical Review of Developments Relating to Aggression’, 24 January 2002, UN Doc. PCNICC/2002/WGCA/L.1 and UN Doc. PCNICC/2002/WGCA/L.1/Add.1, 18 January 2002.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Eighth Session, 6 May–26 July 1996’, UN Doc. A/51/10 (1997), 9–120.Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Bellini, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 621–43.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Ambiguities in Art. 5(2), 121 and 123 of the Rome Statute’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 46 (2009), 413–27.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘States Parties Approve New Crimes for International Criminal Court’, ASIL Insight, 14(16) (22 June 2010), available at: www.asil.org/insights, last accessed 9 July 2014.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B., ‘Negotiating at the Interface of Power and Law: The Crime of Aggression’, Columbia Journal of International Law, 49 (2011), 505–601.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A., ‘Amending the Amendment Provisions of the Rome Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 209–27.Google Scholar

Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09, 4 March 2009.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 1593 (2005) concerning Sudan, 31 March 2005, UN Doc. S/RES/1593.Google Scholar

Aust, A., Handbook of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Barber, J. and Barratt, J., South Africa’s Foreign Policy: The Search for Status and Security 1945–1988 (Johannesburg: Southern, 1990).Google Scholar

Crocker, C., High Noon in Southern Africa: Making Peace in a Rough Neighborhood (New York: W. W. Norton, 1992).Google Scholar

Dugard, J., International Law: A South African Perspective, 4th edn (Cape Town: Juta, 2011).Google Scholar

Geldenhuys, D., The Diplomacy of Isolation: South Africa’s Foreign Policy Making (Johannesburg: Macmillan, 1984).Google Scholar

Heunis, J., United Nations versus South Africa: A Legal Assessment of United Nations and United Nations related Activities in Respect to South Africa (Cape Town: Lex Patria, 1986).Google Scholar

Macmillan, M., Pacemakers: Six Months that Changed the World (London: John Murray, 2001).Google Scholar

Reynolds, D., Summits: Six Meetings that Changed the Twentieth Century (London: Penguin, 2006).Google Scholar

Wiechers, M., Verloren van Themaat Staatsreg (Durban: Butterworth, 1981).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Grover, L., ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 517–33.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Kunschak, M., ‘The African Union and the Right to Intervene: Is there a Need for UN Security Council Authorisation?’, South African Yearbook of International Law, 31 (2006), 195–208.Google Scholar

Schaffer, R. P., ‘The Prerogative of War and Peace: Its Development in South Africa’, South African Yearbook of International Law, 4 (1978), 29–45.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 897–904.Google Scholar

Stemmet, A., ‘All’s Well that Ends Postponed: The Adoption of a Definition of the Crime of Aggression at the Rome Statute Review Conference in Kampala’, African Security Review, 19(4) (2010), 2–16.Google Scholar

Tladi, D., ‘Kampala, the International Criminal Court and the Adoption of a Definition of the Crime of Aggression: A Dream Deferred’, South African Yearbook of International Law, 35 (2010), 80–96.Google Scholar

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Cape Town: Juta Law, 2010).Google Scholar

Koh, H. H., ‘International Criminal Justice 5.0’, Yale Journal of International Law, 38 (2013), 525–42.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. and Buchwald, T., ‘The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective’, The American Journal of International Law 109 (2015), 257–95.Google Scholar

Bellinger, J. B., ‘The United States and the International Criminal Court: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going, Remarks to the DePaul University College of Law’, Chicago, 25 April 2008, available at: http://2001–2009.state.gov/s/l/rls/104053.htm.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court Review Conference, Kampala, Uganda, May 31–June 11, 2010, S. Rpt. 111-55, 2 September 2010.Google Scholar

Questions for the Record, Nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton to be Secretary of State, available at: www.amicc.org/docs/KerryClintonQFRs.pdf.Google Scholar

Rapp, S. J., ‘Speech to Assembly of States Parties’, 19 November 2009, available at: www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP8/Statements/ICC-ASP-ASP8-GenDeba-USA-ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

‘Statement by Japan’, Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Kampala, 31 May–11 June 2010, Official Records, 122–23.Google Scholar

‘US Engagement with the ICC and the Outcome of the Recently Concluded Review Conference’, Special Briefing by Koh, Harold Hongju and Rapp, Stephen J., Washington, 15 June 2010, available at: www.state.gov/j/gcj/us_releases/remarks/2010/143178.htm.Google Scholar

Adamson, M. and Borgos, S., This Mighty Dream: Social Protest Movements in the United States (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984).Google Scholar

Arendt, H., Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Viking Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Carson, C., In Struggle: SNCC and the Black Awakening of the 1960s (Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Charles, J. E., Ella Baker and the SNCC: Grassroots Leadership and Political Activism in a Nonhierarchical Organization (Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag, 2009).Google Scholar

Chong, D., Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement (University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Drumbl, M. A., Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression. The Search for World Peace: A Documentary History and Analysis (2 vols., New York: Oceana, 1975).Google Scholar

Goel, O. P., Strategic Management and Policy Issues of NGOs (Delhi: Chawla Offset Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. and Posner, E., The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. et al., Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements (University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Heath, C. and Heath, D., Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die (New York: Random House, 2007).Google Scholar

Henkin, L., International Law: Politics and Values (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar

Hirschman, A., The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Isserman, M., If I Had a Hammer … the Death of the Old Left and the Birth of the New Left (New York: Basic Books 1987).Google Scholar

Kant, I., The Philosophy of Law: An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence as the Science of Right, trans. Hastie, W. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1887).Google Scholar

May, L., Aggression and Crimes Against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Minow, M., Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Padmanabhan, V., From Rome to Kampala: The US Approach to the 2010 International Criminal Court Review Conference (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Snow, D. A. and Soule, S. A., A Primer on Social Movements (New York: W. W. Norton, 2010).Google Scholar

United Nations War Crimes Commission, History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War (London: HMSO, 1948).Google Scholar

Willie, C. V., Ridini, S. P. and Willard, D. A., Grassroots Social Action: Lessons in People Power Movements (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of The Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Cole, L. R., ‘Externships: A Special Focus to Help Understand and Advance Social Justice’, in Bloch, F. S. (ed.), The Global Clinical Movement: Educating Lawyers for Social Justice (Oxford University Press, 2011), 323–34.Google Scholar

Collins, R., ‘Social Movements and the Focus of Emotional Attention’, in Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M. and Poletta, F. (eds.), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements (University of Chicago Press, 2001), 27–44.Google Scholar

Freeman, J., ‘A Model for Analyzing the Strategic Options of Social Movement Organizations’, in Freeman, J. and Johnson, V. (eds.), Waves of Protest: Social Movements Since the Sixties (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999), 221–40.Google Scholar

Glasius, M., ‘Expertise in the Cause of Justice: Global Civil Society Influence on the Statute for an International Criminal Court’, in Glasius, M., Kaldor, M. and Anheier, H. K. (eds.), Global Civil Society 2002 (Oxford University Press, 2002), 137–68.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M. and Poletta, F., ‘Emotional Dimensions of Social Movements’, in Snow, D. A. et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2004), 413–32.Google Scholar

McAdam, D., ‘Conceptual Origins, Problems, Future Directions’, in McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, 1996), 23–40.Google Scholar

Pace, W. R. and Thieroff, M., ‘Crimes Within the Jurisdiction of the Court’, in Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 1999), 79–126.Google Scholar

Schabas, W., ‘Issue #15: Should Saddam Hussein Be Prosecuted for the Crime of Aggression?’, in Scharf, M. P. and McNeal, G. S. (eds.), Saddam on Trial: Understanding and Debating the Iraqi High Tribunal (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2006), 225–28.Google Scholar

Scott, J. B., ‘The Trial of the Kaiser’, in House, E. M. and Seymour, C. (eds.), What Really Happened at Paris: The Story of the Peace Conference, 1918–1919 (New York: Charles Scribner, 1921), 231–58.Google Scholar

Shukri, M. A., ‘Will Aggressors Ever be Tried Before the ICC?’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Vermont: Ashgate, 2004), 33–42.Google Scholar

von Hebel, H. and Robinson, D., ‘Participation of Non-Governmental Organizations’, in Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 1999), 391–98.Google Scholar

White, S. A., ‘The Catalyst Communicator: Facilitation Without Fear’, in White, S. A. and Nair, K. S. (eds.), The Art of Facilitating Participation: Releasing the Power of Grassroots Communication (New Delhi: Sage, 1999), 15–32.Google Scholar

Adatci, M. and Tachi, S., ‘Commission on the Responsibilities of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties: Report Presented to the Preliminary Peace Conference’, American Journal of International Law, 14 (1920), 95–154.Google Scholar

Akhavan, P., ‘Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?’, American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001), 7–31.Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘The Challenges of Responding to Extrajudicial Executions: Interview with Philip Alston’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2 (2010), 355–73.Google Scholar

Andrews, K. T., ‘The Impact of Social Movements on the Political Process: The Civil Rights Movement and Black Electoral Politics in Mississippi’, American Sociological Review, 62 (1997), 800–19.Google Scholar

Benvenuto, F. M., ‘The Participation of Victims at ICC Proceedings: Brief Reflections on the Question of the Right “to” Trial in the Lubanga Trial: Lessons Learned’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2(1) (2012), 73–84.Google Scholar

Burnham, G., Lafta, R., Doocy, S. and Roberts, L., ‘Mortality after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey’, The Lancet, 368 (2006), 1421–28.Google Scholar

Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme … Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–424.Google Scholar

Cannock, M., ‘Keynote Address at the Lubanga Trial: Lessons Learned Conference, 9 March 2012’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2(1) (2012), 18–28.Google Scholar

Childress, J. F., ‘Just-War Theories: The Bases, Interrelations, Priorities, and Functions of Their Criteria’, Theological Studies, 39 (1978), 427–45.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Negotiating Provisions Defining the Crime of Aggression, its Elements and the Conditions for ICC Exercise of Jurisdiction Over It’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1103–15.Google Scholar

Craver, C. B., ‘The Impact of Labor Unions on Worker Rights and on Other Social Movements’, ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 26 (2011), 267–78.Google Scholar

Damrosch, L. and Oxman, B., ‘Agora: Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict’, American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), 553–628.Google Scholar

Donini, A., Minear, L. and Walker, P., ‘Between Cooptation and Irrelevance: Humanitarian Action after Iraq’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 17 (2004), 261–72.Google Scholar

Drumbl, M. A., ‘The Push to Criminalize Aggression: Something Lost Amid the Gains?’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 41 (2009), 291–319.Google Scholar

Fairlie, M. A., ‘The United States and the International Criminal Court Post-Bush: A Beautiful Courtship but an Unlikely Marriage’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29 (2011), 528–76.Google Scholar

Glennon, M., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2010), 71–114.Google Scholar

Harroff-Tavel, M., ‘Principles Under Fire: Does it Still Make Sense to be Neutral?’, Humanitarian Exchange (2003), 2.Google Scholar

Heath, J. B., ‘Human Dignity at Trial: Hard Cases and Broad Concepts in International Criminal Law’, George Washington International Law Review, 44 (2012), 317–66.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Thoughts on Glennon’s “Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression”,’ Opinio Juris (2010), available at: www.opiniojuris.org/2010/01/29/thoughts-on-glennons-blank-prose-crime-of-aggression, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Joseph, S., ‘Social Media, Political Change, and Human Rights’, Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 35 (2012), 145–88.Google Scholar

Kaul, H. P., ‘Is it Possible to Prevent or Punish Future Aggressive War-Making?’, Forum for International Criminal and Humanitarian Law Occasional Paper Series, 1 (2011), 1–15.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Oxford Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Langan, J., ‘The Elements of St. Augustine’s Just War Theory’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 12 (1984), 19–38.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. D., ‘Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991’, American Sociological Review, 61 (1996), 478–99.Google Scholar

Morris, A., ‘Reflections on Social Movement Theory: Criticisms and Proposals’, Contemporary Society, 29 (2000), 445–54.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E., ‘The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense’, American Society of International Law Task Force on Terrorism (2002), 1–21.Google Scholar

Rieffer-Flanagan, B. A., ‘Is Neutral Humanitarianism Dead? Red Cross Neutrality: Walking the Tightrope of Neutral Humanitarianism’, Human Rights Quarterly, 31 (2009), 888–915.Google Scholar

Santoro, W. A., ‘The Civil Rights Movement’s Struggle for Fair Employment: A “Dramatic Events–Conventional Politics’ Model”’, Social Forces, 81 (2002), 177–206.Google Scholar

Schuster, M., ‘The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression: A Gordian Knot in Search of a Sword’, Criminal Law Forum, 14 (2003), 1–57.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘The Rome Statute’s Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 49–104.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘A Meaningful Definition of the Crime of Aggression: A Response to Michael Glennon’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 33 (2012), 907–69.Google Scholar

von Braun, L. and Micus, A., ‘Judicial Independence at Risk: Raised by Selected Human Rights Organizations’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2010), 111–32.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Prosecuting Aggression’, Harvard International Law Journal, 49 (2008), 161–219.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Conceptualizing Aggression’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20 (2009), 1–68.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Judging Aggression’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 50 (2012), 82–168.Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary, or Arbitrary Executions’, 28 May 2010, United Nations General Assembly, A/HRC/14/24/Add.6Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘About Us’, available at: www.amnestyusa.org/about-us, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘Opt Out System Risks Undermining ICC’, Amnesty International News and Updates, 15 June 2010, available at: www.amnesty.or.jp/en/news/2010/0709_1186.html, last accessed 30 October 2012.Google Scholar

Beirich, H., ‘The Anti-Gay Movement’, Southern Poverty Law Center, available at: www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/ideology/anti-gay/the-anti-gay-movement, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Bensouda, F., ‘The International Criminal Court: A New Approach to International Relations’, David Rockefeller Lecture Series, 21 September 2012, available at: www.cfr.org/international-criminal-courts-and-tribunals/international-criminal-court-new-approach-international-relations/p29067, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Bruno, G., ‘Arab States say “We’ll Sign up to International War Crimes Court when Israel Does”’, The National, 26 May 2011, available at: www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/arab-states-say-well-sign-up-to-international-war-crimes-court-when-israel-does, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Buddhist Peace Fellowship, available at: www.buddhistpeacefellowship.org/category/international, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Caren, N. and Gaby, S., ‘Occupy Online: Facebook and the Spread of Occupy Wall Street’, Social Science Research Network (2011), available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1943168, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Citizens for Global Solutions, ‘ICC Conference Takes Steps to End Aggression’, Press Release, 14 June 2010, available at: https://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/ICC_KampalaPR_wrapup.pdf, last accessed 15 March 2015.Google Scholar

Citizens for Global Solutions, ‘US NGO’s Support Definition of Crime of Aggression in Rome Statute’, Press Release, 4 June 2010, available at: https://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/ICC_KampalaPR_AggressionDef.pdf.Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, ‘About the Coalition’, available at: www.iccnow.org/?mod=coalition, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, ‘Guiding Principles for the Consideration of the Crime of Aggression at the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,’ 31 May–11 June 2010, available at: www.iccnow.org/documents/CICC_Principles_on_the_Crime_of_Aggression_Final_EN.pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Congress of Racial Equality, ‘CORE Volunteers Put Their Lives on the Road’, 2011, available at: www.core-online.org/History/freedom%20rides.htm, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Dicker, R., ‘ICC: Review Conference is Opportunity to Advance the Fight Against Impunity’, 12 April 2010, Human Rights Watch, available at: www.hrw.org/news/2010/04/12/icc-review-conference-opportunity-advance-fight-against-impunity, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

‘Ending Liberia’s Second Civil War: Religious Women as Peacemakers’, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, & World Affairs, Case Study Series (2010), available at: http://repository.berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/110811LiberiaSecondCivilWar[FINAL].pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Email from Robert Manson to Noah Weisbord, 28 October 2012, 10.11 am (on file with author).Google Scholar

Fernando, P., ‘Working with Social Movements’, OECD iLibrary, 260, 27 April 2012, available at: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/poverty-reduction-and-pro-poor-growth/working-with-social-movements_9789264168350–12-en.Google Scholar

Glasius, M., ‘How Activists Shaped the Court’, War Crimes Project, December 2003.Google Scholar

Glennon, M. J., ‘The Vague New Crime of Aggression’, 5 April 2010, New York Times, available at: www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/opinion/06iht-edglennon.html?_r=0, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Goldstone, R., ‘Prosecuting Aggression’, New York Times, 26 May 2010, available at: www.nytimes.com/2010/05/27/opinion/27iht-edpoint.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Gollom, M., ‘Our Own Voice on Iraq?’, 9 October 2008, CBC News, available at: www.cbc.ca/news2/canadavotes/realitycheck/2008/10/our_own_voice_on_iraq.html.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, ‘About Us, Mission Statement’, available at: www.hrw.org/about, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

ICC, ‘Tunisia Becomes the 116th State to Join the ICC’s Governing Treaty, the Rome Statute’, Press Release, ICC-CPI-20110624-PR688, available at: www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/press%20releases/press%20releases%202011/Pages/tunisia%20becomes%20the%20116th%20state%20to%20join%20the%20icc’s%20governing%20treaty_%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx.Google Scholar

ICCSN, Official Website of the International Criminal Court Student Network, available at: www.iccsn.com, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

International Federation for Human Rights, ‘Conclusion of Landmark ICC Review Conference: Difficult Compromise and Commitments to be Confirmed’, 14 June 2010, available at: www.fidh.org/Conclusion-of-landmark-ICC-Review, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Iraq Body Count database, available at: www.iraqbodycount.org/database, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Kaye, D., ‘Prosecuting Aggression’, New York Times, 26 May 2010, available at: www.nytimes.com/2010/05/27/opinion/27iht-edpoint.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. (Legal Advisor to the US Department of State), ‘The Obama Administration and International Law’, Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 25 March 2010 available at: www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/139119.htm, last accessed 15 March 2015.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. (Legal Advisor, to the US Department of State), ‘Statement at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court’, Kampala, Uganda, 4 June 2010, available at: www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/142665.htm, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Kolb, F., ‘The Impact of Transnational Protest on Social Movement Organizations: Mass Media and the Making of ATTAC Germany’, at Conference on Transnational Processes and Social Movements, Villa Serbelloni, Bellagio, 22–26 July 2003.Google Scholar

Letter from Neier, A., President of the Open Society Institute, to Foreign Minister, 10 May 2010, available at: www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/icc-aggression-letter-20100511.pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Méndez, J. E., ‘The Importance of Justice in Securing Peace’, Review Conference of the Rome Statute, 31 May–11 June, 2010, Kampala, Uganda, UN Doc. RC/ST/PJ/INF.3.Google Scholar

Ministerial Panel, ‘Preventing the illegal use of force through judicial accountability. The role of the ICC and its States Parties after the adoption of the Kampala Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, United Nations, New York, 24 September 2012, on file with author, available at: http://unrol.org/files/Save%20the%20Date_Preventing%20the%20illegal%20use%20of%20force.pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

‘Mozambique: Religious Peacebuilders Broker End to Civil War’, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, & World Affairs, Case Study Series, (2011), available at: http://repository.berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/110811Mozambique[FINAL].pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Munyonyo Commonwealth Resort, home page, see at: www.munyonyocommonwealth.com, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Mutua, M., ‘African Human Rights Organizations: Questions of Context and Legitimacy’, Africa Legal Aid, July/Sept. 1987, 9–13.Google Scholar

Natsios, A., ‘Waltz With Bashir: Why the Arrest Warrant Against Sudan’s President Will Serve Neither Peace Nor Justice’, Foreign Affairs, 23 March 2009, available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/64904/andrew-natsios/waltz-with-bashir, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Network of Christian Peace Organisations, ‘About Us’, available at: http://ncpo.org.uk/about-the-ncpo, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

‘Nuremberg Declaration on Peace and Justice’, included in UN Doc. A/62/885, 19 June 2008, available at: www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/491058/publicationFile/3491/080620-NuernbergerErklaerung-EN.pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Obar, J. A., ‘Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action’, Social Science Research Network (2011), available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1956352, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Parliamentarians for Global Action, ‘Programme Overview’, available at: www.pgaction.org/programmes/ilhr/overview.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Parliamentarians for Global Action, ‘On Victory Day, Liechtenstein ratifies Rome Statute Amendment on the Crime of Aggression’, Press Release, 8 May 2012, available at: www.pgaction.org/news/press_releases/liechtenstein-aggression.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Quakers in Britain, ‘Quakers and Peace’, available at: www.quaker.org.uk/quakers-and-peace-0, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Rapp, S. J., Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, ‘Statement to the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court’, Kampala, Uganda, 1 June 2010, available at: www.state.gov/j/gcj/us_releases/remarks/2010/142520.htm, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Schabas, W., ‘An Assessment of Kampala: The Final Blog’, 17 June 2010, available at: http://iccreviewconference.blogspot.com/2010/06/assessment-of-kampala-final-blog.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Adoption of the Amendments on Aggression to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, 13 June 2010, ASIL Blog – International Criminal Court Review Conference, in American Society of International Law, available at: http://iccreview.asil.org, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Schorr, B., ‘Desegregation Drive: Militant Negro Groups Aim to Step Up Attack On Dixie Race Barriers Students Slate More Public Demonstrations, Freedom Rides, Win Elders’ Backing More Calls to Fill the Jails? Desegregation Drive; Negroes Press Attack On Dixie Race Barriers’, Wall Street Journal, 23 January 1962.Google Scholar

Shales, T., ‘Eyes on the Prize: “Marching into History”. A Superlative Documentary on PBS’, The Washington Post, 21 January 1987, available at: www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1302039.html.Google Scholar

Simons, M., ‘International Court May Define Aggression as Crime’, New York Times, 30 May 2010, available at: www.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/world/31icc.html?_r=0, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Solera, O., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the International Criminal Court: Lessons from the Past, Challenges for the Future’, Doctoral dissertation, Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales, Geneva, 2006.Google Scholar

Students for a Democratic Society, ‘About Us’, available at: www.newsds.org./about-us, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Student Peace Action Network, ‘About SPAN’, available at: www.studentpeaceaction.org/Home/About.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Student Peace Union, available at: www.peacebuttons.info/PDF/SPU%20flyer.pdf, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

UN Secretary General, ‘The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-conflict Societies’, Report, 23 August 2004, UN Doc. S/2004/616, 21.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Who Started the Fight’, New York Times, 3 May 2010, available at: www.newyorktimes.com/2010/05/04/opinion, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

‘Young Muslim Activists Launch Global Peace Movement’, Voice of America, 2 November 2009, available at: www.voanews.com/content/a-13–2009-02–11-voa16-68714812/409702.html, last accessed 26 September 2014.Google Scholar

Cornette, J., Le roi de guerre. Essai sur la souveraineté dans la France du Grand Siècle (Paris: Payot, 1993).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Edelstein, D., The Terror of Natural Right. Republicanism, the Cult of Nature, and the French Revolution (Chicago University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Franck, T. M., The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., On Law and War (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., An Introduction to International Institutional Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

Lindstedt, J. and Löytömäki, S., Sotasyyllisyysoikeudenkäynti (Helsinki: Oikeusministeriön julkaisuja, 2010, No. 22/2010) (War Responsibility Trials (Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Justice, 2010, No. 22/2010)).Google Scholar

Prost, M., The Concept of Unity in Public International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Schauer, F., Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-based Decision-making in Law and in Life (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus. United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Weber, M., On Law in Economy and Society, ed. Rheinstein, M. (New York: Touchstone, 1954).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Hegemonic Regimes’, in Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law. Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 305–24.Google Scholar

de Vitoria, F., ‘On the Law of War’, in Pagden, A. and Lawrance, J. (eds.), Political Writings (Cambridge University Press, 1991), 293–327.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., ‘Reconceptualizing Aggression’, Duke Law Journal, 60 (2010), 411–51.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des Cours, 154 (1977), 299–399.Google Scholar

Kacker, D., ‘Coming Full Circle: The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 33 (2010), 257–88.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 89 (1977), 1685–778.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order’, British Yearbook of International Law, 72 (2001), 349–55.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘“The Lady Doth Protest too Much”. Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law’, Modern Law Review, 65 (2002), 159–75.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 6 (2002), 1–36.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Murphy, S., ‘Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1147–56.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 897–904.Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘The “End”, the “Beginning of the End” or the “End of the Beginning”? Introducing Debates and Voices on the Definition of “Aggression”’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 875–82.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Prosecuting Aggression’, Harvard International Law Journal, 49 (2008), 161–220.Google Scholar

Borchard, E., ‘The Multilateral Pact. “The Renunciation of War”’, an address delivered at the Williamstown Institute of Politics, 22 August 1928), available at: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/kbbor.asp.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration on the Enhancement of the Effectiveness of the Principle of Refraining from the Threat or Use of Force in International Relations, 18 November 1987, UN Doc. A/RES/42/22.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes, 15 November 1982, UN Doc. A/ Res/ 37/10.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 266; Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel, 311.Google Scholar

‘The Responsibility to Protect’, Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, December 2001.Google Scholar

Bazargan, S. and Rickless, S. (eds.), The Ethics of War (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Preventive War (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S. and Tadros, V. (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Conditions of Liability to Preventive Attack’, in Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Preventive War (Cambridge University Press, 2013), 121–44.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘War Crimes and Immoral Action in War’, in Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., and Tadros, V. (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2013), 151–84.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘Liability, Proportionality, and the Number of Aggressors’, in Bazargan, S. and Rickless, S. (eds.), The Ethics of War (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Limits of Self-Defence’, in Coons, C. and Weber, M. E. (eds.), The Ethics of Self-Defence (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 11–54.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘Proportionality and Just Cause: A Comment on Kamm’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11 (2014), 428–53.Google Scholar

Neu, M., ‘Why McMahan’s Just Wars are only Justified and Why that Matters’, Ethical Perspectives, 19 (2012), 235–55.Google Scholar

Arnold, R. and Quénivet, N. N. R., International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: Towards a New Merger in International Law (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar

Bricmont, J., Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War (Delhi: Aakar Books, 2007).Google Scholar

Cryer, R. and Boister, N., Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: Charter, Indictment, and Judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cushman, T., The Human Rights Case for the War in Iraq: A Consequentialist View (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

de Vattel, É., The Law of Nations; Or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns …: A Work Tending to Display the True Interest of Powers, trans. from the French (Philadelphia: Pitt, Nicklin & T. Johnson, 1829).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., Of War and Law (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Macklem, P., The Sovereignty of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Meron, T., Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Provost, R., International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Just And Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations, 4th edn (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Effect of Rights on Political Culture’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999), 99–116.Google Scholar

Lazar, S., ‘The Morality and Law of War’, in Marmor, A. (ed.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law (London: Routledge, 2012), 364–79.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J., ‘How to Judge Soldiers Whose Cause is Unjust’, in Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008), 112–30.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Morality of War and the Law of War’, in Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008), 19–43.Google Scholar

Office of the United States Chief of Counsel For Prosecution of Axis Criminality, ‘Chapter IX Launching of Wars of Aggression’, in Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (The Red Set), vol. I (8 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1946), 370–874.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘The Human Right to Peace’, in Eide, A., Möller, J. Th. and Ziemele, I. (eds.), Making Peoples Heard. Essays on Human Rights in Honour of Gudmundur Alfredsson (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011), 43–57.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Freedom from Fear and the Human Right to Peace’, in Keane, D. and McDermott, Y. (eds.), The Challenge of Human Rights: Past, Present and Future (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012), 36–51.Google Scholar

af Jochnick, C. and Normand, R., ‘Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War’, Harvard International Law Journal, 35 (1994), 49–95.Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 815–44.Google Scholar

Arneson, R. J., ‘Just Warfare Theory and Noncombatant Immunity’, Cornell International Law Journal, 39 (2006), 663–88.Google Scholar

Bellin, E., ‘The Iraqi Intervention and Democracy in Comparative Historical Perspective’, Political Science Quarterly, 119 (2004), 595–608.Google Scholar

Benbaji, Y., ‘The War Convention and the Moral Division of Labour’, Philosophical Quarterly, 59 (2009), 593–617.Google Scholar

Bennoune, K., ‘Toward a Human Rights Approach to Armed Conflict: Iraq 2003’, UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, 11 (2004), 171–228.Google Scholar

Boister, N., ‘The Application of Collective and Comprehensive Criminal Responsibility for Aggression at the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: The Measure of the Crime of Aggression?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 425–47.Google Scholar

Bomann-Larsen, L., ‘Licence to Kill? The Question of Just vs. Unjust Combatants’, Journal of Military Ethics, 3 (2004), 142–60.Google Scholar

Burnham, G., Lafta, R., Doocy, S. and Roberts, L., ‘Mortality after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey’, The Lancet, 368 (2006), 1421–28.Google Scholar

Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme … Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–423.Google Scholar

de Mesquita, B. B. and Downs, G. W., ‘Intervention and Democracy’, International Organization, 60 (2006), 627–49.Google Scholar

Dill, J., ‘Should International Law Ensure the Moral Acceptability of War?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), 253–70.Google Scholar

Durand, A., ‘Gustave Moynier and the Peace Societies’, International Review of the Red Cross, 36 (1996), 532–50.Google Scholar

Engle, K., ‘Calling in the Troops: The Uneasy Relationship among Women’s Rights, Human Rights, and Humanitarian Intervention’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20 (2007), 189–226.Google Scholar

Falk, R., ‘Haiti Intervention: A Dangerous World Order Precedent for the United Nations’, Harvard International Law Journal, 36 (1995), 341–58.Google Scholar

Farer, T., ‘Un-Just War Against Terrorism and the Struggle to Appropriate Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 30 (2008), 356–403.Google Scholar

Freeman, M., ‘International Law and Internal Armed Conflicts: Clarifying the Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Protections’, Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (2000), https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/152, last accessed 3 November 2015.Google Scholar

Gattini, A., ‘The UN Compensation Commission: Old Rules, New Procedures on War Reparations’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 161–81.Google Scholar

Gerwin, M., ‘Peace, Honesty, and Consent: A Hobbesian Definition of “Peace”’, Peace Research, 23 (1991), 75–85.Google Scholar

Gillard, E-C., ‘Reparation for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 529–53.Google Scholar

Glanville, L., ‘The Antecedents of “Sovereignty as Responsibility”’, European Journal of International Relations, 17 (2010), 233–55.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., ‘The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 819–53.Google Scholar

Hsiao-Rei Hicks, M. et al., ‘The Weapons That Kill Civilians: Deaths of Children and Noncombatants in Iraq, 2003–2008’, New England Journal of Medicine, 360 (2009), 1585–88.Google Scholar

Kahl, C. H., ‘In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs? Norms, Civilian Casualties, and US Conduct in Iraq’, International Security, 32 (2007), 7–46.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Occupied Zone: A Zone of Reasonableness?’, Israel Law Review, 41 (2008), 13–40.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1 (2010), 47–58.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and Mégret, F., ‘The Regulation of Non-International Armed Conflicts: Can a Privilege of Belligerency be Envisioned in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts?’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96(893) (2014), 29–66.Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D., ‘The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 235–82.Google Scholar

Lazar, S., ‘The Responsibility Dilemma for Killing in War: A Review Essay’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 38 (2010), 180–213.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘Just War and Human Rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9 (1980), 160–81.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘The Legacies of Nuremberg’, Social Research, 54 (1987), 779–829.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘A Theory of Crimes against Humanity’, Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), 85–167.Google Scholar

Lubell, N., ‘Challenges in Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, 87 (2005), 737–54.Google Scholar

Macklem, P., ‘What is International Human Rights Law: Three Applications of a Distributive Account’, McGill Law Journal, 52 (2007), 575–604.Google Scholar

Martinez, J. and Bouvier, A., ‘Assessing the Relationship between Jus in Bello and Jus Ad Bellum: An “Orthodox” View’, American Society of International Law: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 100 (2006), 109–12.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 247–68.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘L’étatisme spécifique du droit international’, Revue québécoise de droit international (RQDI), 24 (2012), 105–29.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Missions autorisées par le conseil de sécurité à l’heure de la R2P: au-delà du jus in bello?’, Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, 52 (2013), 205–40.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘The Apology of Utopia: Reflections on Some Koskenniemian Themes with Particular Emphasis on Massively Institutionalized Human Rights Law’, Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 27 (2013), 455–97.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Response to Claus Kreß: Leveraging the Privilege of Belligerency in Non-International Armed Conflict Towards Respect for the Jus in Bello’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96 (2014), 44–66.Google Scholar

Mégret, F. and Pinto, F., ‘“Prisoners’ Dilemmas”: The Potemkin Villages of International Law?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 16 (2003), 467–90.Google Scholar

Meisels, T., ‘Combatants: Lawful and Unlawful’, Law and Philosophy, 26 (2007), 31–65.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000), 239–78.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Norm Conflict in International Law: Whither Human Rights’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20 (2009), 69–131.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’, New England Review (1990–), 27 (2006), 252–64.Google Scholar

Modirzadeh, N. K., ‘The Dark Sides of Convergence: A Pro-Civilian Critique of the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict’, International Law Studies Series, US Naval War College, 86 (2010) 349–410.Google Scholar

Orford, A., ‘Muscular Humanitarianism: Reading the Narratives of the New Interventionism’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 679–711.Google Scholar

Rocheleau, J., ‘Combatant Responsibility for Fighting in Unjust Wars’, Social Philosophy Today, 26 (2010), 93–106.Google Scholar

Rodin, D., ‘Liability of Ordinary Soldiers for Crimes of Aggression’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 591–607.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Lex Specialis – Belt and Suspenders – The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus Ad Bellum’, Israel Law Review, 40 (2007), 592–613.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Freedom from Fear, Human Rights, and the Crime of Aggression’, Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 43 (2011), 167–72.Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion’, American Journal of International Law, 78 (1984), 645–50.Google Scholar

Scharf, M. P., ‘Tainted Provenance: When, if Ever, Should Torture Evidence be Admissible’, Washington & Lee Law Review, 65 (2008), 129–72.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Genocide and Atrocity Crimes’, Genocide Studies and Prevention, 1 (2006), 229–50.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40 (2007), 111–35.Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. N., ‘Wound, Capture, or Kill: A Reply to Ryan Goodman’s “The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants”’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 855–61.Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo’, European Journal of International Law, 21 (2010), 1085–102.Google Scholar

Simpson, G., ‘“Stop Calling it Aggression”: War as Crime’, Current Legal Problems, 61 (2008), 191–228.Google Scholar

Smith, M. E., ‘NATO, the Kosovo Liberation Army, and the War for an Independent Kosovo: Unlawful Aggression or Legitimate Exercise of Self-Determination’, Army Law (2001), 1–22.Google Scholar

Smith, T. W., ‘Can Human Rights Build a Better War?’, Journal of Human Rights, 9 (2010), 24–44.Google Scholar

Solomon, S., ‘Targeted Killings and the Soldiers’ Right to Life’, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 14 (2007), 99–120.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, U., ‘Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants’, Journal of Ethics, 16 (2012), 339–66.Google Scholar

Tomasevski, K., ‘The Right to Peace’, Current Research on Peace and Violence, 5 (1982), 42–69.Google Scholar