Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:19:48.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - crime and justice in the states, 1789–1839

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Elizabeth Dale
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Tocqueville did not stop with his observation about the lack of central power; he also argued that the individual state governments assumed that sovereign role. And histories of criminal law in the United States have followed Tocqueville. They begin from the premise that in the first century and a half of the constitutional order, from the implementation of the Constitution in 1789 to the rise of New Deal jurisprudence in 1939, the United States saw the emergence of a nationwide capitalist economy in the context of separate, local States. And so, instead of studying the development of a single, national system of criminal justice, those histories of criminal law in the United States look at the development of parallel, local systems of criminal law.

Because criminal justice was localized, the scope of the State in the United States was smaller, encompassing only the institutions of city, county, and state governments. Many have argued that that smaller scale was the system’s greatest strength, because it permitted a degree of popular participation unimaginable in a nation-state; the nineteenth-century American State was responsive to local ideas of justice and the concerns of the sovereign people. In this view of criminal justice in the United States, the local State maintained order by channeling disputes into the state court system, which ruled according to norms defined and applied by the people of the community.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Curtis, Michael KentFree Speech: The People’s Darling Privilege 2000 246

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×