Alvarez, J. A. and Emory, E. (2006) ‘Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review.’ Neuropsychology Review, 16:17–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsuglia, J. P., Nedjat-Haiem, F. R., Shapira, J. S., Valasco, C., Jimenez, E. E., Mather, M. J. and Mendez, M. F. (2014) ‘Observational themes of social behavioral disturbances in frontotemporal dementia.’ International Psychogeriatrics, 26(9): 1475–1481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021400091X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2008) ‘Agitated behavior in persons with dementia: The relationship between type of behavior, its frequency, and its disruptiveness.’ Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(1): 64–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.02.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Desmarais, P., Lanctot, K. L., Masellis, M., Black, S. E. and Herrmann, N. (2018) ‘Social inappropriateness in neurodegenerative disorders.’ International Psychogeriatrics, 30(2): 197–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217001260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diehl-Schmid, J., Monsch, A. U., Aebi, C., Wagenpfeil, S., Krapp, S., Grimmer, T., Seeley, W., Förstl, H. and Kurz, A. (2005) ‘Frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: The contribution of standard neuropsychological tests to differential diagnosis.’ Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 18: 39–44. doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0891988704272309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diehl-Schmid, J., Bornschein, S., Pohl, C., Förstl, H., Jurz, A. and Jahn, T. (2011) ‘Cognitive decline in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia.’ International Pscyhogeriatrics, 23(2): 230–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021000164X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dooley, J., Bailey, C. and McCabe, R. (2015) ‘Communication in healthcare interactions in dementia: A systematic review of observational studies.’ International Psychogeriatrics, 27(8): 1277–1300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214002890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Erickson, F. and Schultz, J. (1997) ‘When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence’, in Cole, M., Engeström, Y. and Vasquez, O. (eds.) Mind, Culture, and Activity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–31.Google Scholar

Guendouzi, J. A. and Müller, N. (2006) Approaches to Discourse in Dementia. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (2006) ‘The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction’, in Enfield, N.J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.) Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg Publishers, pp. 375–398.Google Scholar

Hydén, L.-C. (2014) ‘Cutting Brussels sprouts: Collaboration involving persons with dementia.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 29: 115–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.02.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendrick, K. H. and Drew, P. (2016) ‘Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1): 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindell, J., Keady, J., Sage, K. and Wilkinson, R. (2017) ‘Everyday conversation in dementia: A review of the literature to inform research and practice.’ International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(4): 392–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kipps, C., Knibb, J. A. and Hodges, J. R. (2007) ‘Clinical presentations of frontotemporal Dementia’, in Hobbs, J. R. (ed.) Frontotemporal Dementia Syndrome. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majlesi, A. R. and Ekström, A. (2016) ‘Baking together – the coordination of actions in activities involving people with dementia.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 38: 37–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mates, A. W., Mikesell, L. and Smith, M. S. (eds.). (2010) Language, Interaction and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Mendez, M. F., Fong, S. S., Shapira, J. S., Jimenez, E. E., Kaiser, N. C., Kremen, S. A. and Tsai, P. (2014) ‘Observation of social behavior in frontotemporal dementia.’ American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 29(3): 215–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317513517035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mikesell, L. (2010a) ‘Examining perseverative behaviors of a frontotemporal dementia patient and caregiver responses: The benefits of observing ordinary interactions and reflections on caregiver stress’, in Mates, A. W., Mikesell, L. and Smith, M. S. (eds.) Language, Interaction and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind. London: Equinox, pp. 85–113.Google Scholar

Mikesell, L. (2010b) ‘Repetitional responses in frontotemporal dementia discourse: Asserting agency or demonstrating confusion?’ Discourse Studies, 12(4): 465–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikesell, L. (2014) ‘Conflicting demonstrations of understanding in interactions with individuals with frontotemporal dementia: Considering cognitive resources and their implications for caring and communication’, in Schrauf, R. and Müller, N. (eds.) Dialogue and Dementia: Cognitive and Communicative Resources for Engagement. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 147–180.Google Scholar

Mikesell, L. (2016) ‘Opposing orientations in interactions with individuals with frontotemporal dementia: Blurring the boundaries between conflict and collaboration.’ Journal on Language Aggression and Conflict, 4(1): 62–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.4.1.03mik.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikesell, L. (2020) ‘Does atypicality entail impairment? Tracing a cohesive marker in the interactions of an individual with schizophrenia’, in Wilkinson, R., Rae, J. and Rasmussen, G. (eds.) Atypical Interaction: Impacts of Communicative Impairments within Everyday Talk. Cham, Switzerland: Macmillan, pp. 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikesell, L. and Bromley, E. (2016) ‘Exploring the heterogeneity of “schizophrenic speech” outside of the clinic’, in O’Reilly, M. and Lester, J. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health: Discourse and Conversations Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 329–351.Google Scholar

Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuff, D., Black, S. et al. (1998) ‘Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria.’ Neurology, 51: 1546–1554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Keefe, F. M., Murray, B., Coen, R. F., Dockree, P. M., Bellgrove, M. A., Garavan, H., Lynch, T. and Robertson, I. H. (2007) ‘Loss of insight in frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy.’ Brain, 130(3): 75–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl367.Google Scholar

Perkins, L., Whitworth, A. and Lesser, R. (1998) ‘Conversing in dementia: A conversation analytic approach.’ Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(1–2): 33–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(98)00004-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. and Fehr, B. J. (2007) ‘Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices’, in van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 64–91.Google Scholar

Roscovsky, K., Hodges, J. R., Knopman, D. et al. (2011) ‘Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.’ Brain,134(pt 9): 2456-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1968) ‘Sequencing in conversational openings.’ American Anthropologist, 70: 1075–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973) ‘Opening up closings.’ Semiotica, 7(4): 289–327. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.Google Scholar

Shany-Ur, T. and Rankin, K.P. (2011) ‘Personality and social cognition in neurodegenerative disease.’ Current Opinion in Neurology, 24(6): 550–555. doi: https://10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834cd42a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stivers, T. (2005) ‘Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2): 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torralva, T., Roca, M., Gleichgerrcht, E., Bekinschtein, and Manes, F. (2009) ‘A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia.’ Brain, 132: 1299–1309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005) ‘Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.’ Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatterton, W., Baker, F. and Morgan, K. (2010) ‘The singer or the singing: Who sings individually to persons with dementia and what are the effects?’ American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 25(8): 641–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen-Mansfield, J. and Werner, P. (1997) ‘Typology of disruptive vocalizations in older persons suffering from dementia.’ International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12(11): 1079–1091.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cuddy, L. L. and Duffin, J. (2005) ‘Music, memory, and Alzheimer’s disease: Is music recognition spared in dementia, and how can it be assessed?’ Medical Hypotheses, 64(2): 229–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dacre, H. (1892/1925) Daisy Bell (Bicycle Built for Two). New York: Harms, Inc.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2013) Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, R. M. G. L. W. (2015) Dementia and singing: A conversation analysis case study of singing in everyday interaction. PhD dissertation, [Online] Available at: https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/3484zg88m.Google Scholar

Frick, M. (2013) ‘Singing and codeswitching in sequence closings.’ Pragmatics, 23(2): 243–273.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1987) ‘Forgetfulness as an interactive resource.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2): 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L.-C. (2011) ‘Non-verbal vocalizations, dementia and social interaction.’ Communication & Medicine, 8(2): 135–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jefferson, G. (1979) ‘A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination.’ In Psathas, G. (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1996) ‘On the poetics of ordinary talk.’ Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1): 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.’ In Lerner, G. H. (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation: Vol. 125 Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggieri, M., Thaut, M. H., Fornazzari, L., Schweizer, T. A., Barfett, J., Munoz, D. G. and Fischer, C. E. (2019) ‘Music intervention approaches for Alzheimer’s disease: A review of the literature.’ Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13: 132–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lerner, G. H. (1996) ‘On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker.’ In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelbaum, J. (2013) ‘Storytelling in conversation’. In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 492–507.Google Scholar

Muntigl, P. and Choi, K. T. (2010) ‘Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy.’ Discourse Studies, 12(3): 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1978) ‘Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints.’ In Schenkein, J. (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. and Heritage, J. (2013) ‘Preference.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 210–228.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, G. (2020) ‘Singing as a resource in conversations involving persons with dementia.’ In Wilkinson, R., Rae, J. P. and Rasmussen, G. (eds.) Atypical Interaction: The Impact of Communicative Impairments within Everyday Talk. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodgers, R. and Hammerstein, O. II (1943) ‘Kansas City’, Act I, Oklahoma! New York: Williamson Music Co.Google Scholar

Ryan, D. P., Tainsh, S. M. M., Kolodny, V., Lendrum, B. L. and Fisher, R. H. (1988) ‘Noise-making amongst the elderly in long term care.’ The Gerontologist, 28(3): 369–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Samuelsson, C. and Hydén, L. C. (2011) ‘Intonational patterns of nonverbal vocalizations in people with dementia.’ American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 26(7): 563–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Särkämö, T., Laitinen, S., Tervaniemi, M., Numminen, A., Kurki, M. and Rantanen, P. (2012) ‘Music, emotion, and dementia: Insight from neuroscientific and clinical research.’ Music and Medicine, 4(3): 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sidnell, J. (2010) Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Language in Society. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar

Stevanovic, M. (2012) ‘Establishing joint decisions in a dyad.’ Discourse Studies, 14(6): 779–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swall, A., Hammar, L. M. and Gransjön Craftman, Å. (2020) ‘Like a bridge over troubled water – a qualitative study of professional caregiver singing and music as a way to enable person-centred care for persons with dementia.’ International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 15(1): 1735092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2006) ‘Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2): 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bristol, R. and Rossano, F. (2020) ‘Epistemic trespassing and disagreement.’ Journal of Memory and Language, 110: 104067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. and O’Leary, K. (1988) ‘Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions.’ In Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (eds.) Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex. New York: Longman, pp. 74–93.Google Scholar

Drew, P. (2013) ‘Turn design.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley, pp. 131–149.Google Scholar

Ekberg, K., Ekberg, S., Weinglass, L., Rendl-Short, J., Bluebond-Langner, M., Yates, P., Bradford, N. and Danby, S. (2022) ‘Attending to child agency in paediatric palliative care consultations: Adult’s use of tag questions directed to the child.’ Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(3): 566–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elsey, C. (2020) ‘Dementia in conversation: Observations from triadic memory clinic interactions.’ In Wilkinson, R., Rae, J. P. and Rasmussen, G (eds.) Atypical Interaction: The Impact of Communicative Impairments within Everyday Talk. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1978) ‘Response cries.’ Language 54(4): 787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. H. (2004) ‘Participation.’ In Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 222–244.Google Scholar

Goodwin, M. H. (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., Manes, F., Dronkers, N. F., Vandenberghe, R. M. D., Rascovsky, K., Patterson, K., Miller, B. L., Knopman, D. S., Hodges, J. R., Mesulam, M. M. and Grossman, M. (2011) ‘Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants’. Neurology, 76(11): 1006–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heinemann, T. and Traverso, V. (2009) ‘Complaining in interaction.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 2381–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepburn, A. and Potter, J. (2010). ‘Interrogating tears: Some uses of tag questions in a child protection helpline.’ In Freed, A. F. and Ehrlich, S. (eds.) ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar

Hepburn, A. and Potter, J. (2011) ‘Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2): 216–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethdology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1998) ‘Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry.’ Language in Society, 27(3): 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. (2010) ‘Questioning in medicine.’ In Freed, A. F., and Ehrlich, S. (eds.) ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–68.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (2012) ‘Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J. (2013) ‘Epistemics in conversation.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 370–394.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (2005) ‘The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1): 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J., and Raymond, G. (2012) ‘Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions.’ In De Ruiter, J.‑P (ed.) Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodges, J. R. (2005) Addenbrook’s cognitive examination [Online]. www.neurovascularmedicine.com/ace.pdf.Google Scholar

Holt, E. (1996) ‘Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3): 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.’ In Lerner, G. (ed) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jokel, R., Rochon, E. and Leonard, C. (2006) ‘Treating anomia in semantic dementia: Improvement, maintenance, or both?’ Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16(3):241–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keisanen, T. (2007). ‘Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker.’ In Englebretson, R. (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kertesz, A., Jesso, S., Harciarek, M., Blair, M. and McMonagle, P. (2010) ‘What is semantic dementia? A cohort study of diagnostic and clinical boundaries.’ Archives of Neurology, 67(4): 483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kindell, J., Sage, K., Keady, J. and Wilkinson, R. (2013) ‘Adapting to conversation with semantic dementia: Using enactment as a compensatory strategy in everyday social interaction.’ International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(5): 497–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2013) ‘Action formation and ascription.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Boston, MA: Blackwell-Wiley, pp. 103–130.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1980) ‘“Telling my side”: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device.’ Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4): 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, G., Dalby, K. E. and Muth, E. (2019) ‘Working out availability, unavailability and awayness in social face-to-face encounters: The case of dementia.’ Discourse Studies, 21(3): 258–279.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. D. (2020) ‘One type of polar, information-seeking question and its stance of probability: Implications for the preference for agreement.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(4): 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation.’ Language, 50(4): 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schnabel, E. L., Wahl, H. W., Streib, C. and Schmidt, T. (2021) ‘Elderspeak in acute hospitals? The role of context, cognitive and functional impairment.’ Research on Aging, 43(9–10): 416–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Snowden, J., Goulding, P. J. and Neary, D. (1989) ‘Semantic dementia: A form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy.’ Behavioural Neurology, 2(3): 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snowden, J., Kindell, J. and Neary, D. (2006) ‘Diagnosing semantic dementia and managing communication difficulties.’ In Bryan, K. and Maxim, J. (eds.) Communication Disability in the Dementias. London: Whurr, pp. 125–146.Google Scholar

Sorjonen, M.-L. and Peräkylä, A. (2012) ‘Introduction.’ In Peräkylä, A. and Sorjonen, M.-L. (eds.) Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2014) ‘Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations.’ Language in Society, 43(2): 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) (2011) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svennevig, J. and Landmark, A. M. D. (2019) ‘Accounting for forgetfulness in dementia interaction.’ Linguistics Vanguard, 5(s2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor-Rubin, C., Croot, K., Power, E., Savage, S. A., Hodges, J. R. and Togher, L. (2017) ‘Communication behaviors associated with successful conversation in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.’ International Psychogeriatrics, 29(10): 1619–1632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilkinson, R. (2014) ‘Intervening with Conversation Analysis in speech and language therapy: Improving aphasic conversation.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3): 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K. and Sage, K., 2011. ‘Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia.’ International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1): 74–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, K., Kemper, S. and Hummert, M. L. (2004) ‘Enhancing communication with older adults overcoming elderspeak.’ Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30(10): 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, K. N., Herman, R., Gajewski, B. and Wilson, K. (2009). ‘Elderspeak communication: Impact on dementia care.’ American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 24(1): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Antaki, C. and Crompton, R. J. (2015) ‘Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities.’ Discourse & Society, 26(6): 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antaki, C. and Webb, J. (2019) ‘When the larger objective matters more: Support workers’ epistemic and deontic authority over adult service‐users.’ Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(8): 1549–1567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Backhaus, P. (2018) ‘Reclaiming agency in resident–staff interaction: A case study from a Japanese eldercare facility.’ Discourse Studies, 20(2): 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooker, D. and Kitwood, T. (2019) Dementia Reconsidered, Revisited: The Person Still Comes First. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Drew, P. (1997) ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1): 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drew, P. and Kendrick, K. H. (2018) ‘Searching for trouble: Recruiting assistance through embodied action.’ Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 1(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmertsen, S. and Heinemann, T. (2010) ‘Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2): 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. (2017) ‘Distribution of agency.’ In Enfield, N.J. and Kockelman, P. (eds.) Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. and Kockelman, P. (2017) ‘Editors’ Preface.’ In Enfield, N.J. and Kockelman, P. (eds.) Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. xi–xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrara, K. (1994) ‘Repetition as rejoinder in therapeutic discourse: Echoing and mirroring.’ In Johnstone, B. (ed.) Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2 vols.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 66–84.Google Scholar

Hamilton, H. E. (2019) Language, Dementia and Meaning Making. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinemann, T. (2011) ‘From home to institution: Roles, relations and the loss of autonomy in the care of old people in Denmark.’ In Backhaus, P. (ed.) Communication in Elderly Care: Crosscultural Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 90–111.Google Scholar

Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G.B. (2013) ‘The conversation analytic approach to transcription.’ In Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984) ‘A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.’ In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. and Clayman, S. (2011) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions (Vol. 44). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (2005) ‘The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1): 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L. C. and Örulv, L. (2009) ‘Narrative and identity in Alzheimer’s disease: A case study.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 23(4): 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hydén, L. C. and Samuelsson, C. (2019) ‘“So they are not alive?”: Dementia, reality disjunctions and conversational strategies.’ Dementia, 18(7–8): 2662–2678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jansson, G., Plejert, C. and Lindholm, C. (2019) ‘The social organization of assistance in multilingual interaction in Swedish residential care.’ Discourse Studies, 21(1): 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1972) ‘Side sequences.’ In Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 295–331.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘Glossary of transcript symbols.’ Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 24–31.Google Scholar

Kendrick, K. H. and Drew, P. (2016) ‘Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landmark, A. M. D., Nilsson, E., Ekström, A. and Svennevig, J. (2021) ‘Couples living with dementia managing conflicting knowledge claims.’ Discourse Studies, 23(2): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1979) ‘Activity types and language.’ Linguistics, 17(5–6): 365–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindholm, C. (2015) ‘Parallel realities: the interactional management of confabulation in dementia care encounters.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2): 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindholm, C. (2016) ‘Boundaries of participation in care home settings: Use of the Swedish token jaså by a person with dementia.’ Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(10): 832–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindholm, C. and Stevanovic, M. (2022) ‘Challenges of trust in atypical interaction.’ Pragmatics & Society, 13(1): 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindström, A. (1999) ‘Language as social action: Grammar, prosody, and interaction in Swedish conversation (Grammatik, prosodi och interaktion i svenska samtal)’, Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar

Lindström, A. (2005) ‘Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance.’ In Hakulinen, A. and Selting, M. (eds.) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linell, P. (2009) Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar

Mazeland, H. (2019) ‘Activities as discrete organizational domains.’ In Reber, E. and Gerhardt, C. (eds.) Embodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings: Social Encounters in Time and Space. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H. et al. (2011) ‘The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease.’ Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 7(3): 263–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nilsson, E. (2017) ‘Fishing for answers: Couples living with dementia managing trouble with recollection.’ Educational Gerontology, 43(2): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nilsson, E., Ekström, A. and Majlesi, A. R. (2018) ‘Speaking for and about a spouse with dementia: A matter of inclusion or exclusion?’ Discourse Studies, 20(6): 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Österholm, J. H. and Samuelsson, C. (2015) ‘Orally positioning persons with dementia in assessment meetings.’ Ageing & Society, 35(2): 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, T. and Wästerfors, D. (2009) ‘“Such trivial matters”: How staff account for restrictions of residents’ influence in nursing homes.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 23(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1980) ‘Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device.’ Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4): 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984) ‘Pursuing a response.’ In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–164.Google Scholar

Rossi, G. and Zinken, J. (2017) ‘Social agency and grammar.’ In Enfield, N. J. and Kockelman, P. (eds.) Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryvicker, M. (2009) ‘Preservation of self in the nursing home: Contradictory practices within two models of care.’ Journal of Aging Studies, 23(1): 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1968) ‘Sequencing in conversational openings 1.’ American Anthropologist, 70(6): 1075–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrauf, R. W. (2020) ‘Epistemic responsibility – Labored, loosened, and lost: Staging Alzheimer’s disease.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 168: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Selting, M. (1996) ‘Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair initiation.’ In Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Selting, M. (eds.) Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevanovic, M. (2013) ‘Deontic rights in interaction: A conversation analytic study on authority and cooperation’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2012) ‘Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide.’ Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2014) ‘Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations.’ Language in Society, 43(2): 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) (2011) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (Vol. 29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svennevig, J. (2003) ‘Echo answers in native/non-native interaction.’ Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 13(2): 285–309.Google Scholar

Svennevig, J. (2013) ‘Reformulation of questions with candidate answers.’ International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(2): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svennevig, J. and Hamilton, H. (2022) ‘Fostering storytelling by persons with dementia in multiparty conversation.’ In Røyneland, U. and Blackwood, R. (eds.) Multilingualism across the Lifespan. London: Routledge, pp. 169–188.Google Scholar

Svennevig, J. and Landmark, A. M. (2019) ‘Accounting for forgetfulness in dementia interaction.’ Linguistics Vanguard, 5(s2): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svennevig, J., Hansen, P., Simonsen, H. G. and Landmark, A. M. D. (2019) ‘Code-switching in multilinguals with dementia: Patterns across speech contexts.’ Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(10–11): 1009–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, V., Webb, J., Dowling, S. and Gall, M. (2019) ‘Direct and indirect ways of managing epistemic asymmetries when eliciting memories.’ Discourse Studies, 21(2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar