Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:43:41.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2020

Devin O. Pendas
Devin O. Pendas
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950 , pp. 202 - 215
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Belov, G. A. Um ein antifaschistisch-demokratisches Deutschland: Dokumente aus den Jahren 1945–1949. Berlin: Staatsverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, 1968.Google Scholar
A Decade of American Foreign Policy, 1941–1949: Basic Documents, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1985.Google Scholar
Die Haltung der beiden deutschen Staaten zu den Nazi- und Kriegsverbrechen. Berlin: Staatsverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, 1965.Google Scholar
Dorn, Walter L. Inspektionsreisen in der US-Zone: Notizen, Denkschriften und Erinnerungen aus dem Nachlaß, ed. Niethammer., Lutz Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstallt, 1973.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States: The Conference at Quebec, 1944. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
German History in Documents and Images, vol. 8, Occupation and the Emergence of Two States, 1945–1961. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, n.d.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Martin ed. The Churchill War Papers: The Ever-Widening War, 1941, vol. 3. New York: W.W. Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Historic Hansard, HC Deb, https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/sittings/1940s.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London 1945. Washington, DC: Department of State, 1949.Google Scholar
Kranzbühler, Otto. Rückblick auf Nürnberg. Hamburg: Zeit-Verlag, 1949.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Karl. “Reconstruction of the Administration of Justice in American-Occupied Germany.” Harvard Law Review 61/3 (1948): pp. 419–467.Google Scholar
Merrit, Anna J., and Merritt, Richard L. eds. Public Opinion in Occupied Germany: The HICOG Surveys, 1949–1955. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Münch, Ingo. Dokumente des geteilten Deutschland, vol. 1. Stuttgart: Kröner, 1968.Google Scholar
Office of United States Chief of Counsel for Prosecution of Axis Criminality. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression: Opinion and Judgment. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1947.Google Scholar
Peters, Gerhard, and Woolley, John T.. The American Presidency Project. Available online at: www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=16026.Google Scholar
Rößler, Ruth-Kristin. Entnazifizierungspolitik der KPD/SED, 1945–1948. Goldbach: Keip, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley F. The American Road to Nuremberg: The Documentary Record, 1944–1945. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1982.Google Scholar
The Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945–1 October 1946, 42 vols. Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947.Google Scholar
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 15 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.Google Scholar
The United Nations Review: War and Peace Aims, No. 1. New York: United Nations Information Office, 1943.Google Scholar
Verhandlung des Deutschen Bundestages, vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1949.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam. “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): pp. 7–31.Google Scholar
Angermund, Ralph. Deutsche Richterschaft 1919–1945. Krisenerfahrung, Illusion, politische Rechtsprechung. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1990.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitariansm, New ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Poetics of Aristotle, trans. and ed. by Butcher, S. H.. Edinburgh: R&R Clark, 1907.Google Scholar
Arthur, Paige. “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice.” Human Rights Quarterly 31/2 (2009): pp. 321–367.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. “Human Rights, Criminal Law, and the Principles of Legal Certainty and Non-Retrospectivity,” in Arnold, Jörg et al. eds., Menschengerechtes Strafrecht: Festschrift für Albin Eser zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2005, pp. 49–59.Google Scholar
Ball, Howard. Prosecuting War Crimes and Genocide: The Twentieth-Century Experience. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bankier, David. The Germans and the Final Solution: Public Opinion under Nazism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
Bankier, David ed. Probing the Depths of German Antisemitism: German Society and the Persecution of the Jews, 1933–1941. New York: Berghan, 2000.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Bartov, Omer. Hitler’s Army: Soldiers, Nazis, and War in the Third Reich. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. Crimes against Humanity in International Criminal Law, 2nd rev. ed. The Hague: Kluwer, 1999.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. “The ‘Nuremberg Legacy,’” in Mettraux, Guénaël ed., Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 577–598.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. “Das ‘Vermächtnis von Nürnberg’: eine historische Bewertung fünzig Jahre dannach,” in Hankel, Gerd and Stuby, Gerhard eds., Strafgerichte gegen Menschheits-Verbrechen. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 1995.Google Scholar
Bauer, Yehuda. Jews for Sale? Nazi-Jewish Negotiations, 1933–1945. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beevor, Antony. The Fall of Berlin 1945. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Beigbeder, Yves. Judging War Criminals: The Politics of International Justice. New York: St. Martins, 1999.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Hilde et al. Zur Geschichte der Rechtspflege, 1945–1949. Berlin: Akademie für Staats- und Rechtswissenschaft der DDR, 1976.Google Scholar
Benser, Günter. “Zum Prozeß und zu den Wirkungen der Entnazifizierung in der sowjetischen Besatzungzone.” Geschichtsunterricht und Staatsbürgerkunde 29 (1987): pp. 702–707.Google Scholar
Berk, Richard. “New Claims about Execution and General Deterrence: Déjà vu All over Again.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2 (July 2005): 303–330.Google Scholar
Bessel, Richard. Germany 1945: From War to Peace. New York: Harper Perennial, 2009.Google Scholar
Biddescombe, Perry. The Denazification of Germany: A History, 1945–1950. Stroud: Tempus, 2007.Google Scholar
Bilsky, Leora. Transformative Justice: Israeli Identity on Trial. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David, and Ely, Geoff. The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bloxham, Donald. Genocide on Trial: War Crimes Trials and the Formation of Holocaust History and Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bloxham, Donald. “‘The Trial that Never Was’: Why There Was No Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg.” History 87 (2002): pp. 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, Walter Hart. Rendezvous with Chance: How Luck Has Shaped History. New York: Exposition Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Bohr, Felix. Die Kriegsverbrecherlobby: Bundesdeutsche Hilfe für im Ausland inhaftierte NS-Täter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2018.Google Scholar
Bookbinder, Paul. Weimar Germany: The Republic of the Reasonable. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Borgwardt, Elizabeth. A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bower, Tom. The Pledge Betrayed: America, Britain and the denazification of Post-War Germany. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1982.Google Scholar
Broszat, Martin, and Weber, Hermann eds. SBZ-Handbuch: Staatliche Verwaltungen, Parteien, gesellschaftliche Organisationen und ihre Führungskräfte in der Sowjetischen Besatzungzone Deutschlands, 1945–1949. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1990.Google Scholar
Broszat, Martin. “Siegerjustiz oder strafrechtliche ‘Selbstreinigung’: Aspekte der Vergangenheitsbewältigung der deutschen Justiz während der Besatzungszeit 1945–1949.” Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte 29/4 (1981): pp. 477–544.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher. Collected Memories: Holocaust History and Postwar Testimony. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Perennial, 1998 [1992].Google Scholar
Bryant, Michael. Confronting the “Good Death”: Nazi Euthanasia on Trial, 1945–1953. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2005.Google Scholar
Buruma, Ian. The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1994.Google Scholar
Buscher, Frank M. The U.S. War Crimes Trial Program in Germany, 1946–1955. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bush, Jonathan. “The Prehistory of Corporations and Conspiracy in International Criminal Law: What Nuremberg Really Said.” Columbia Law Review 109 (2009): pp. 1094–1242.Google Scholar
Bush, Jonathan. “‘The Supreme … Crime’ and Its Origin: The Lost Legislative History of Aggressive War.” Columbia Law Review 102 (2002): pp. 2234–2423.Google Scholar
Carter, Linda E., Ellis, Mark S., and Jallow, Charles Chernor. The International Criminal Court in an Effective Global Justice System. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar
Clark, Anne Marie. Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Conot, Robert E. Justice at Nuremberg. New York: Caroll and Graf, 1983.Google Scholar
Coquillette, Daniel R. The Anglo-American Legal Heritage. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Kai. Vom spurlosen Verschwindenlassen zur Benachrichtigungspflicht bei Festnahmen. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, 2006.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. “Nomos and Narrative,” in Minow, Martha, Ryan, Michael, and Sarat, Austin eds., Narrative, Violence and the Law: The Essays of Robert Cover. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 95–172.Google Scholar
Cramer, John. Belsen Trial 1945: Der Lüneberger Prozess gegen Wachpersonal der Konzentrationslager Auschwitz und Bergen-Belsen. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2011.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eugene. The Nuremberg Fallacy. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1998 [1973].Google Scholar
de Grieff, Pablo. The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dennis, Mike. The Stasi: Myth and Reality. Harlow: Pearson, 2003.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J., and Wolfers, Justin. “Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate.” Stanford Law Review 58 (December 2005): pp. 791–846.Google Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence. “The Didactic Trial: Filtering History and Memory in the Courtroom.” European Review 14/4 (2006): pp. 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence. The Right Wrong Man: John Demjanjuk and the Last Great Nazi War Crimes Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Ehret, Susanne. Franz von Liszt und das Gesetzlichkeitsprinzip. Zugleich ein Beitrag wider die Gleichsetzung von Magna-charta-Formel und Nullum-crimen-Grundsatz. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar
Eichmüller, Andreas. “Die Strafvervolgung von NS-Verbrechen durch westdeutsche Justizbehörden seit 1945.” Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte 56/4 (2008): pp. 621–640.Google Scholar
Eichmüller, Andreas. Keine Generalamnestie: Die Strafverfolgung von NS-Verbrechern in der frühen Bundesrepublik. Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Carolyn Woods. Drawing the Line: The American Decision to Divide Germany, 1944–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Eisert, Wolfgang. Die Waldheimer Prozesse: Der stalinistische Terror 1950. Munich: Bechtle Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Erickson, John. The Road to Berlin: Stalin’s War with Germany. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Eschenburg, Theodor. Jahre der Besatzung, 1945–1950. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1983.Google Scholar
Fabréguet, Michel. “La Commission des Nations Unies pour les Crimes de Guerre et la Notion de Crimes contre l’Humanité (1943–1948).” Revue d’Allemangne 23 (Fall 1991): pp. 519–553.Google Scholar
Feldmann, Horst. Das Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit. Essen: West Verlag, 1948.Google Scholar
Ferencz, Benjamin B. An International Criminal Court: A Step toward World Peace – A Documentary History and Analysis. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1980.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm von. Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland gültigenpeinlichen Rechts. Gießen: G. F. Heyer, 1840 [1801].Google Scholar
Frei, Norbert. Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and Integration. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Frei, Norbert. Amerikanische Lizenzpolitik und deutsche Pressetradition: Die Geschichte der nachkriegszeitung Südost-Kurier. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1986.Google Scholar
Frei, Norbert. Vergangenheitspolitik: Die Anfänge der Bundesrepublik und die NS-Vergangenheit. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1996.Google Scholar
Frei, Norbert ed. Transnationale Vergangenheitspolitik: Der Umgang mit deutschen Kriegsverbrechern in Europa nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2006.Google Scholar
Freudiger, Kerstin. Die juristische Aufarbeitung von NS-Verbrechen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J., and Brezezinski, Zbigniew K.. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. New York: Praeger, 1965.Google Scholar
Fritsche, Peter. Germans into Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Fulbrook, Mary. The People’s State: East German Society from Hitler to Honcecker. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Füssl, Karl-Heinz. Die Umerziehung der Deutschen: Jugend und Schule unter den Siegermächten des Zweiten Weltkriegs, 1945–1955. Paderborn: F. Schöningh, 1994.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. The Cold War: A New History. New York: Penguin Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gellately, Robert. Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gieseke, Jens. Die Stasi, 1945–1990. Munich: DVA, 2001.Google Scholar
Goda, Norman J. W. Tales from Spandau: Nazi Criminals and the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Godau-Schüttke, Klaus-Detlev. Ich habe nur dem Recht gedient: Die ‘Renazifizierung’ der Schleswig-Holsteinischen Justiz nach 1945. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1993.Google Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel J. Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel J., Browning, Chrisopher R., and Wieseltier, Leon. The “Willing Executioners”/“Ordinary Men” Debate: Selections from the Symposium, April 8, 1996. Washington, DC: United States Holocaust Research Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
Gottwald, Stefan. Das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht: Eine zeitgeschichtliches Erklärungsmodell. Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
Grebing, Helge. “Demokratie ohne Demokraten? Politisches Denken, Einstellungen und Mentalitäten in der Nachkriegszeit,” in Holtmann, Everhard ed., Wie neu war der Neubeginn? Zum deutschen Kontinuitätsproblem nach 1945. Erlangen: Universitätsbund Erlange-Nürnberg, 1989, pp. 6–19.Google Scholar
Grieder, Peter. The East German Leadership, 1946–1973. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gross, Leonard. The Last Jews in Berlin. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982.Google Scholar
Gross, Raphael. “Der Führer als Betrüger: Moral und Antipositivismus in Deutschland 1945/1946 am Beispiel Fritz von Hippels,” in Klein, Anne and Wilhelm, Jürgen eds., NS-Unrecht vor Kölner Gerichten nach 1945. Cologne:Greven Verlag, 2003, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Atina. “A Question of Silence: The Rape of German Women by Occupation Soldiers.” October 72 (1995): pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
Halbrainer, Heimo, and Kuretsidis-Haider, Claudia eds. Kriegsverbrechen, NS-Gewaltverbrechen und die europäische Strafjustiz von Nürnberg bis Den Haag. Graz: Clio, 2007.Google Scholar
Hankel, Gerd, and Stuby, Gerhard eds. Strafgerichte gegen Menschheitsverbrechen: Zum Völkerstrafrecht 50 Jahre nach den Nürnberger Prozessen. Hamburg: HamburgerEdition, 1995.Google Scholar
Hastings, Max. Armageddon: The Battle for Germany, 1944–1945. New York: Vintage Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Heberer, Patricia, and Matthäus, Jürgen eds. Atrocities on Trial: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Prosecuting War Crimes. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Manfred. Umerziehung und Wiederaufbau: die Bildungspolitik der Besatzungsmächte in Deutschland und Österreich. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1981.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, Helmut et al. eds. Deutsche Juristen jüdischer Herkunft. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1993.Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon. The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Herbert, Ulrich. Best: Biographische Studien über Radikalismus, Weltanschauung und Vernunft, 1903–1989. Bonn: J. H. W. Dietz, 1996.Google Scholar
Herbert, Ulrich ed. Wandlungsprozesse in Westdeutschland: Belastung, Integration, Liberalisierung, 1945–1980. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2002.Google Scholar
Herf, Jeffrey. Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Herf, Jeffrey. The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hett, Benjamin Carter. Death in the Tiergarten: Murder and Criminal Justice in the Kaiser’s Berlin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. “The Soviets at Nuremberg: International Law, Propaganda, and the Making of the Postwar Order.” American Historical Review 113/3 (June 2008): pp. 701–730.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. “The Soviet Union, the Nuremberg Trials, and the Politics the Postwar Moment,” in Meierhenrich, Jens and Pendas, Devin O. eds., Political Trials in Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 157–183.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Christa. Stunden Null? Vergangenheitsbewältigung in Deutschland, 1945 und 1989. Bonn: Bouvier, 1992.Google Scholar
Hohmann, Joachim S. Der Euthanasie-Prozeß Dresden, 1947. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang, 1993.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jardim, Thomaz. The Mauthausen Trial: American Military Justice in Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Jasper, Gotthard. “Justiz und Politik in der Weimarer Republik.” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 30 (1982): pp. 167–205.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. “Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?” International Organization 70/3 (2016): pp. 443–475.Google Scholar
Jones, Priscilla Dale. “Nazi Atrocities against Allied Airmen: Stalag Luft III and the End of British War Crimes Trials.” The Historical Journal 41 (1998): pp. 543–565.Google Scholar
Jung, Susanne. Die Rechtsprobleme der Nürnberger Prozesse. Dargestellt am Verfahren gegen Friedrich Flick. Tübingen: Mohr, 1992.Google Scholar
Jungius, Martin, and Seibel, Wolfgang. “Der Bürger als Schreibtischtäter. Der Fall Kurt Blanke.” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 56/2 (2008): pp. 265–300.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Marion. Between Dignity and Despair: Jewish Life in Nazi Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Arthur. “Die Naturrechtsrenaissance der ersten Nachkriegsjahre—und was daraus geworden ist,” in Stolleis, Michael et al. eds., Die Bedeutung der Wörter. Festschrift für Sten Gagnér zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1991, pp. 105–132.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Ian. Hitler, the Germans, and the Final Solution. Jerusalem: International Institute for Holocaust Research, 2008.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Ian. Popular Opinion and Political Dissent in the Third Reich, 1933–1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon, and Sikkink, Kathryn. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 54/4 (2010): pp. 939–963.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Kleßmann, Christoph. Die doppelte Staatsgründung: Deutsche Geschichte, 1945–1955, 5th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 1991.Google Scholar
Kochavi, Arieh J. Prelude to Nuremberg: Allied War Crimes Policy and the Question of Punishment. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Koonz, Claudia. The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kössler, Till. “Die Grenzen der Demokratie. Antikommunismus als politische und gesellschaftliche Praxis in der frühen Bundesrepublik,” in Creuzberger, Stefan and Hoffmann, Dierk eds., “Geistige Gefahr” und “Immunisierung der Gesellschaft”: Antikommunismus und politische Kultur in der frühen Bundesrepublik. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2014, pp. 229–250.Google Scholar
Krach, Tillmann. Jüdische Rechtsanwalte in Preußen: Bedeutung und Zestörung der freien Advokatur. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1991.Google Scholar
Kröger, Klaus. “Der Wandel des Grundrechtsverständnisses in der Weimarer Republik,” in Köbler, Gerhard et al. eds., Geschichtliche Rechtswissenschaft; Ars Tradendo Innovandoque Acquitatem Sectandi. Freundesgabe für Alfred Söllner zum 60. Geburtstag. Gießen: Brühlscher Verlag, 1990, pp. 299–312.Google Scholar
Kühl, Kristian. “Rückblick auf die Renaissance des Naturrechts nach dem 2. Weltkrieg,” in Köbler, Gerhard et al. eds., Geschichtliche Rechtswissenschaft: Ars Tradendo Innovandoque Acquitatem Sectandi. Freundesgabe für Alfred Söllner zum 60. Geburtstag. Gießen: Brühlscher Verlag, 1990, pp. 331–357.Google Scholar
Landsman, Stephan. Crimes of the Holocaust: The Law Confronts the Hard Cases. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lang, Martin. Stalins Strafjustiz gegen deutsche Soldaten: Die Massenprozesse gegen deutsche Kriegsgefangene in den Jahren 1949 und 1950 in historischer Sicht. Herford: Mittler, 1981.Google Scholar
Ledford, Kenneth F. From General Estate to Special Interest: German Lawyers, 1878–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lingen, Kerstin von. Kesselring’s Last Battle: War Crimes Trials and Cold War Politics, 1945–1960. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2009.Google Scholar
Longerich, Peter. “Davon haben wir nichts gewusst!”: Die Deutschen und die Judenverfolgung, 1933–1945. Munich: Siedler, 2006.Google Scholar
Loth, Wilfried. Stalins ungeliebtes Kind. Warum Moskau die DDR nicht wollte. Berlin: Rohwolt, 1994.Google Scholar
Lovenheim, Barbara. Survival in the Shadows: Seven Jews Hidden in Hitler’s Berlin. Rochester, NY: Center for Holocaust Awareness and Information, 2002.Google Scholar
Lührs, Wilhelm. “Wilhelm Kiesselbach,” in Neue Deutsche Biographie, vol. 11. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1977: pp. 599–600.Google Scholar
Mallmann, Klaus-Michael, and Paul, Gerhard eds. Karrieren der Gewalt: nationalsozialistische Täterbiographien. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2004.Google Scholar
Malycha, Andreas. Die SED. Geschichte ihrer Stalinisierung, 1946–1953. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2000.Google Scholar
Maser, Werner. Nürnberg: Tribunal der Sieger. Düsseldorf: Econ Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Meinicke, Wolfgang. “Die Entnazifizierung in der sowjetischen Besatzungzone 1945 bis 1948.” Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 32 (1984): pp. 968–979.Google Scholar
Mertens, Thomas. “Nazism, Legal Positivism and Radbruch’s Thesis on Statutory Injustice.” Law and Critique 14 (2003): pp. 277–295.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elisabeth. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Meuter, Günter. Carl Schmitts ‘nomos basileus’ oder: Der Wille des Führers ist Gesetz. Über den Versuch, die konkrete Ordnung als Erlösung vom Übel des Positivismus zu denken. Munich: Institut für Staatswissenschaft, Universität der Bundeswehr, 2000.Google Scholar
Meyer, Beate. “Jüdische Mischlinge”: Rassenpolitik und Verfolgungserfahrung 1933–1945, 3rd ed. Hamburg: Dölling und Galitz Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Meyer-Seitz, Christian. Die Verfolgung von NS-Straftaten in der Sowjetischen Besatzungszone. Berlin: Arno Spitz, 1998.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, Henri. La Répression par les Tribunaux Allemands des Crimes contre L’Humanité et de L’Appartenance a une Organisation Criminelle en Application de la Loi No. 10 du Conseil de Contôle Allié. Paris: Librarie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1960.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Murder. Boston: Beacon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Miquel, Marc von. Ahnden oder amnestieren? Westdeutsche Justiz und Vergangenheitspolitik in den sechziger Jahren. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2004.Google Scholar
Moeller, Robert G. War Stories: The Search for a Usable Past in the Federal Republic of Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Moghalu, Kingsley Chiedu. Global Justice: The Politics of War Crimes Trials. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2006.Google Scholar
Moisel, Claudia. Frankreich und die deutschen Kriegsverbrecher: Politik und Praxis der Strafverfolgung nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2004.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Müller, Ingo. Furchtbare Juristine: Die unbewältigte Vergangenheit unserer Justiz. Munich: Knaur, 1989.Google Scholar
Muller, Jerry Z. The Other God That Failed: Hans Freyer and the Deradicalization of German Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Naimark, Norman M. “To Know Everything and to Report Everything Worth Knowing: Building the East German Police State, 1945–1949.” Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars Working Paper No. 10. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1994.Google Scholar
Naimark, Norman M. The Russians in Germany: A History of the Soviet Zone of Occupation, 1945–1949. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
National Front des Demokratischen Deutschlands. Braunbuch: Kriegs- und Naziverbrecher in der Bundesrepublic. Berlin: Staatsverlag der DDR, 1965.Google Scholar
Neusel, Werner. Höchstrichterliche Strafgerichtsbarkeit in der Republik von Weimar. Frankfurt: Athenäum, 1972.Google Scholar
Niethammer, Lutz. Mitläuferfabrik: die Entnazifizierung am Beispiel Bayerns. Berlin: Dietz, 1982.Google Scholar
Noakes, J., and Pridham, G. eds. Nazism, 1919–1945, vol. 2, State, Economy and Society, 1933–1939. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
O’Donnel, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Olenhuse, Albrecht Gotz von. “Zur Entwicklung völkischen Rechtsdenkens: Frühe rechtsradikale Programmatik und bürgerliche Rechtswissenschaft,” in Vogel, Hans Jochen et al. eds., Die Freiheit des Anderen: Festschrift für Martin Hirsch. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1981, pp. 77–108.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K. In the House of the Hangman: The Agonies of German Defeat, 1943–1949. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark. Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Osterloh, Jörg, and Clemens, Vollnhals eds. NS-Prozesse und deutsche Öffentlichkeit: Besatzungszeit, frühe Bundesrepublik und DDR. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 2011.Google Scholar
Overy, Richard. Interrogations: The Nazi Elite in Allied Hands, 1945. New York: Viking, 2001.Google Scholar
Paul, Gerhard ed. Täter der Shoah: fanatische Nationalsozialisten oder ganz normale Deutsche? Göttingen: Wallstein, 2002.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L. “Radbruch on Unjust Laws: Competing Earlier or Later Views?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (1995): pp. 489–500.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O., Jockusch, Laura, and Finder, Gabriel N.. “Auschwitz Trials: The Jewish Dimension.” Yad Vashem Studies 41/2 (2013): pp. 139–171.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O., Mark, Roseman, and Wetzell, Richard F. eds. Beyond the Racial State: New Perspectives on Nazi Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. “Criminals, Enemies, and the Politics of Transitional Justice,” in Sarat, Austin et al. eds., Criminals and Enemies. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2018, pp. 22–43.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–1965: Genocide, History and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. “Testimony,” in Ziemann, Benjamin and Dobson, Miriam eds., Reading Primary Sources: The Interpretation of Texts from Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century History. London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 226–242.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. “Truth and Its Consequences: Reflections on Political, Historical and Legal ‘Truth’ in West German Holocaust Trials.” Traverse: Zeitschrift für Geschichte/Revue d’histoire 11 (2004): pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev. Inside Nazi Germany: Conformity, Opposition, and Racism in Everyday Life. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Plesch, Dan. Human Rights after Hitler: The Lost History of Prosecuting Axis War Crimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. A Digest of the Law of Partnership Incorporating the Partnership Act, 1890, 6th ed. London: Stevens and Sons, 1895.Google Scholar
Port, Andrew I. Conflict and Stability in the German Democratic Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Pretzel, Andreas ed. NS-Opfer unter Vorbehalt: Homosexuelle Männer in Berlin nach 1945. Münster: Lit Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Priemel, Kim Christian. The Betrayal: The Nuremberg Trials and German Divergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Priemel, Kim Christian, and Stiller, Alexa eds. Reassesing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals: Transitional Justice, Trial Narratives, and Historiography. New York: Berghahn, 2012.Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. Rechtsphilosophie: Studienausgabe, 2nd ed. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2003.Google Scholar
Raim, Edith. Justiz zwischen Diktatur und Demokratie. Wiederaufbau und Ahndung von NS-Verbrechen in Westdeutschland 1945–1949. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2013.Google Scholar
Ramm, Joachim. Eugen Schiffer und die Reform der deutschen Justiz. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1987.Google Scholar
Reichel, Peter. Vergangenheitsbewältigung in Deutschland: Die Auseinandersetzung mit der NS-Diktatur von 1945 bis heute. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2001.Google Scholar
Remy, Steven P. The Malmedy Massacre: The War Crimes Trial Controversy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Reuß, Ernst. Vier Sektoren – Eine Justiz: Berliner Justiz in der Nachkriegszeit. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Robertson, Geoffrey. Crimes against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice. New York: The New Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rockenmaier, Dieter W., and Hermyt, Elisabeth. Denunzianten. 47 Fallgeschichten aus den Akten der Gestapo im NS-Gau Mainfranken. Würzburg: Echter, 1998.Google Scholar
Römer, Sebastian. Mitglieder verbrecherischer Organizationen nach 1945: Die Ahndung des Organisationsverbrechens in der britischen Zone durch die Spruchgerichte. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2005.Google Scholar
Roseman, Mark. A Past in Hiding: Memory and Survival in Nazi Germany. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I., and Thompson, Dennis eds. Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rottleuthner, Hubert. “Rechtspositivismus und Nationalsozialismus: Bausteine zu einer Theorie der Rechtsentwicklung.” Demokratie und Recht 15 (1987): pp. 373–394.Google Scholar
Rückerl, Adalbert. NS-Verbrechen vor Gericht: Versuch einer Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 1984.Google Scholar
Rüping, Hinrich. “Denunziationen im 20. Jahrhundert als Phänomen der Rechtsgeschichte.” Historical Social Research 26 (2001): pp. 30–43.Google Scholar
Rüping, Hinrich. Staatsanwälte und Parteigenossen: Haltung der Justiz zur nationalsozialistischen Vergangenheit zwischen 1945 und 1949 im Bezirk Celle. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1994.Google Scholar
Rüthers, Bernd. Carl Schmitt im Dritten Reich: Wissenschaft als Zeitgeist-Verstärkung? 2nd exp. ed. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1990.Google Scholar
Rüthers, Bernd. Die unbegrenzgte Auslegung: Zum Wandel der Privatrechtsordnung im Nationalsozialismus. Tübingen: Mohr, 1968.Google Scholar
Rüthers, Bernd. Entartetes Recht: Rechtslehren und Kronjuristen im Dritten Reich. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1994.Google Scholar
Sands, Phillippe ed. From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sauer, Berhard. Schwarze Reichswehr und Fememorde: Eine Mileustudie zum Rechtsradikalismus in der Weimarer Republik. Berlin: Metropol, 2004.Google Scholar
Scheuren-Brandes, Christoph M. Der Weg von Nationalsozialistischen Rechtslehren zur Radbruchschen Formel: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Idee vom ‘Unrichtigen Recht’. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2006.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Das internationale-rechtliche Verbrechen des Angriffskrieges und der Grundsatz “Nullum Crimen, nulla poena sine lege, ed. Quaritsch, Helmut. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994 [1945].Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy, trans. by Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004 [1932].Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Über Schuld und Schuldarten. Eine terminologische Untersuchung. Breslau: Schletter’sche Buchhandlung, 1910.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Helmut ed. A Nation of Victims? Representations of German Wartime Suffering, 1945 to the Present. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi, 2007.Google Scholar
Schoeps, Manfred. “Der Deutsche Herrenklub: ein Beitrag des Jungkonservatismus in der Weimarer Republik.” Ph.D. diss. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 1974.Google Scholar
Scholz, Friedrich. Berlin und seine Justiz: Die Geschichte des Kammergerichtsbezirks 1945 bis 1980. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1982.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Hans-Ludwig. Gesetz und Richter: Zur geschichtlichen Entwicklung des Satzes nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege. Frankfurt am Main: Alfred Metzner Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar
Schrenck-Notzing, Caspar von. Charakterwäsche: die Re-Education der Deutschen und ihre bleibenden Auswirkungen, exp. ed. Graz: Ares-Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Sheehan, James J. Where Have All the Soldiers Gone? The Transformation of Modern Europe. Boston: Mariner Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter H. Jr. Soviet Criminal Justice under Stalin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Spilker, Dirk. The East German Leadership and the Division of Germany: Patriotism and Propaganda, 1945–1953. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Steinweis, Alan. Kristallnacht 1938. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stern, Frank. The Whitewashing of the Yellow Badge: Antisemitism and Philosemitism in Postwar Germany. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Stoltzfus, Nathan. Resistance of the Heart: Intermarriage and the Rosenstrasse Protest in Nazi Germany. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.Google Scholar
Svarez, Carl Gottlieb. Vorträge über Recht und Staat, ed. Conrad, Hermann and Kleinheyer, Gerd. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
Swett, Pamela E. “Political Violence, Gesinnung, and the Courts in Late Weimar Berlin,” in Biess, Frank, Roseman, Mark, and Schissler, Hannah eds., Conflict, Catastrophe and Continuity: Essays on Modern German History. New York: Berghahn Books, 2007, pp. 60–79.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Trainin, A. N. Hitlerite Responsibility under Crimnal Law. London: Hutchinson, 1945.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon. Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice. New York: Pathfinder, 1969.Google Scholar
Vollnhals, Clemens ed. Entnazifizierung: politische Säuberung und Rehabilitierung in den vier Besatzungszonen 1945–1949. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
Walther, Manfred. “Hat der juristiche Positivismus die deutschen Juristen wehrlos gemacht?” Kritische Justiz 21 (1988): pp. 263–280.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Weckel, Ulrike. Beschämende Bilder: Deutsche Reaktionen auf alliierte Dokumentarfilme über befreite Konzentrationslager. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul Julian. Nazi Medicine and the Nuremberg Trials: From Medical War Crimes to Informed Consent. Houndsdmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Weingartner, James J. Crossroads of Death: The Story of the Malmedy Massacre and Trial. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Welsh, Helga A. Revolutionärer Wandel auf Befehl? Entnazifizierungs- und Personalpolitik in Thüringen und Sachsen (1945–1948). Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1989.Google Scholar
Wentker, Hermann. Justiz in der SBZ/DDR, 1945–1953: Transformation und Rolle ihrer zentralen Institutionen. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2001.Google Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne. The Cold War: A World History. New York: Basic Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Wetzel, Richard F. Inventing the Criminal: A History of German Criminology, 1880-1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. “Latin America’s Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left.” Journal of Democracy 24 (2013): pp. 18–32.Google Scholar
Wieland, Günther. “Die Ahndung von NS-Verchen in Ostdeutschland, 1945–1990,” in Rüter, C. F. ed., DDR-Justiz und NS-Verbrechen: Sammlung Deutscher Strafurteile wegen Nationalsozialistischer Tötungsverbrechen. Register und Dokumente. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wilke, Jürgen et al. eds. Holocaust und NS-Prozesse: Die Presseberichterstattung in Israel und Deutschland zwischen Aneigung und Abwehr. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Winkler, Heinrich August. Der lange Weg nach Westen: Deutsche Geschichte, 2 vols. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2000.Google Scholar
Winter, Stephen. Transitional Justice in Established Democracies: A Political Theory. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Wojak, Irmtrud. Fritz Bauer, 1903–1968: Eine Biographie. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2009.Google Scholar
Wolle, Stefan. Der große Plan: Alltag und Herrschaft in der DDR, 1949–1961. Berlin: Ch. Links Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Wyschogrod, Edith. Spirit in Ashes: Hegel, Heidegger, and Man-Made Mass Death. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Zatlin, Jonathan R. The Currency of Socialism: Money and Political Culture in East Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Devin O. Pendas, Boston College, Massachusetts
  • Book: Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950
  • Online publication: 11 September 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139021074.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Devin O. Pendas, Boston College, Massachusetts
  • Book: Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950
  • Online publication: 11 September 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139021074.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Devin O. Pendas, Boston College, Massachusetts
  • Book: Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950
  • Online publication: 11 September 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139021074.008
Available formats
×