Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:58:19.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Teun A. van Dijk
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Discourse and Knowledge
A Sociocognitive Approach
, pp. 329 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, B. (2008). Presuppositions and common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(5), 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, E. (ed.) (1981). What’s news: the media in American society. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
Abel, R. R., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1986). Maps, mode of text presentation, and children’s prose learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abelson, R. P. (1973). The structure of belief systems. In Schank, R. C., and Colby, K. M. (eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 287–340). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Abelson, R. P. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In Carroll, J. S., and Payne, J. W. (eds.), Cognition and social behavior (pp. 33–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Abelson, R. P. (1994). A personal perspective on social cognition. In Devine, P. G., Hamilton, D. L., and Ostrom, T. M. (eds.), Social cognition: impact on social psychology (pp. 15–37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, N. (1980). Class, structure, and knowledge: problems in the sociology of knowledge. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., and Turner, B. S. (eds.) (1990). Dominant ideologies. London/Boston: Unwin/Hyman.
Aboud, F. E. (1988). Children and prejudice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (eds.) (1990). Social identity theory: constructive and critical advances. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (1994). Pratiques sociales et représentation. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Abu-Akel, A. (2002). The psychological and social dynamics of topic performance in family dinnertime conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1787–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, D., and Tauber, M. J. (eds.) (1990). Mental models and human-computer interaction, vol. 1. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
Adler, J. E. (1996). Transmitting knowledge. Nous, 30(1), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Aebischer, V., Deconchy, J. P., and Lipiansky, E. M. (1992). Idéologies et représentations sociales. Fribourg: Delval.Google Scholar
Agar, M. (2005). Local discourse and global research: the role of local knowledge. Language in Society, 34(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, M., and Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews. Discourse Processes, 5(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnone, J. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: the policy impact of the US environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 1593–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2009). Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language, 16(1), 63–88.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, P. B. (1998). Psychology, law, and eyewitness testimony. Chichester/New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S., and Burcham, S. (2007). The impact of text coherence on learning by self-explanation. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, S., and Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koc, A. (1996). Frames of mind through narrative discourse. In Slobin, D. I., Gerhardt, J., Kyratzis, A., and Guo, J. (eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 309–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Alali, A. O., and Eke, K. K. (1991). Media coverage of terrorism: methods of diffusion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Albert, E. (1986). Culture patterning of speech behavior in Burundi. In Gumperz, J., and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication (pp. 72–105). New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Albrecht, J. E., and O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. A., and Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualizations for the information age. In Graesser, , Gernsbacher, , and Goldman, (eds.), (pp. 199–241).
Alexander, Y., and Latter, R. (eds.) (1990). Terrorism and the media: dilemmas for government, journalists and the public. Washington, DC: Brassey’s (US).
Allan, S. (ed.) (2010). The Routledge companion to news and journalism. New York: Routledge.
Allen, C., and Bekoff, M. (1997). Species of mind: the philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Allen, G. L., Kirasic, K. C., and Spilich, G. J. (1997). Children’s political knowledge and memory for political news stories. Child Study Journal, 27(3), 163–177.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (1993). The reliability of sense perception. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (1996). A realist conception of truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (2005). Beyond “justification”: dimensions of epistemic evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Altschull, J. H. (1984). Agents of power: the role of the news media in human affairs. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Alvermann, D. E., and Hague, S. A. (1989). Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82(4), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvermann, D. E., and Hynd, C. R. (1989). Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on nonscience majors’ comprehension of physics. Journal of Educational Research, 83(2), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvermann, D. E., Hynd, C. E., and Qian, G. (1995). Effects of interactive discussion and text type on learning counterintuitive science concepts. Journal of Educational Research, 88(3), 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K., and Trudgill, P. (2006). Sociolinguistics: an international handbook of the science of language and society, 2nd edn. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. A., and Owens, J. (eds.) (1990). Propositional attitudes: the role of content in logic, language, and mind. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Anderson, J. R. (1980). Concepts, propositions, and schemata: what are the cognitive units? Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. C. (1973). Learning principles from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(1), 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., and Montague, W. E. (eds.) (1977). Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Anmarkrud, Ø., and Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonietti, A., Liverta Sempio, O., and Marchetti, A. (eds.) (2006). Theory of mind and language in developmental contexts. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Antos, G., Ventola, E., and Weber, T. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of interpersonal communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRef
Apfelbaum, E. P., Pauker, K., Ambady, N., Sommers, S. R., and Norton, M. I. (2008). Learning (not) to talk about race: when older children underperform in social categorization. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1513–1518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apffel-Marglin, F., and Marglin, S. A. (eds.) (1996). Decolonizing knowledge: from development to dialogue. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Apker, J., and Eggly, S. (2004). Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: considering the ideological discourse of morning report. Qualitative Health Research, 14(3), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apple, M. W. (1982). Education and power. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Apple, M. W. (1986). Teachers and texts: a political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Apple, M. W. (1993). Official knowledge: democratic education in a conservative age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Apple, M. W. (2012). Knowledge, power, and education: the selected works of Michael W. Apple. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Apter, T. (1996). Expert witness: who controls the psychologist’s narrative? In Josselson, R. (ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (pp. 22–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. A. (ed.) (2006). Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Arbib, M. A., Conklin, E. J., and Hill, J. A. C. (1987). From schema theory to language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Argyle, M., Trimboli, L., and Forgas, J. (1988). The bank manager/doctor effect: disclosure profiles in different relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128 (1), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aries, E. J., and Johnson, F. L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9(12), 1183–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aries, E. J., and Seider, M. (2007). The role of social class in the formation of identity: a study of public and elite private college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(2), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armand, F. (2001). Learning from expository texts: effects of the interaction of prior knowledge and text structure on responses to different question types. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(1), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., and Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?Reading Research Quarterly. 1987, Sum, 22(3), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction: studies of talk at work. Aldershot, Hants/Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1973). Belief, truth and knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronowitz, S. (1988). Science as power: discourse and ideology in modern society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaja, M., Häkkinen, P., Eteläpelto, A., and Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2000). Collaborative processes during report writing of science learning project: the nature of discourse as a function of task requirements. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, T. (ed.) (1973). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. New York: Humanities Press.
Asad, T. (1979). Anthropology and the analysis of ideology. Man, 14(4), 624–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N. (2004). Discourse topic. Theoretical Linguistics, 30(2–3), 163–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, E. (1994). Metaphor in context: an examination of the significance of metaphor for reflection and communication. Educational Studies, 20(3), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asp, E. D., and de Villiers, J. (2010). When language breaks down: analysing discourse in clinical contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astington, J. W., and Olson, D. R. (1990). Metacognitive and metalinguistic language: learning to talk about thought. Applied Psychology, 39(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. (1992). A comparative analysis of formal and informal courtroom interaction. In Drew, , and Heritage, (eds.).
Atlas, J. D. (2000). Logic, meaning, and conversation: semantical underdeterminacy, implicature, and the semantics/pragmatics interface. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (1993). Cognitive foundations of natural history: towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge University Press, Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (1996). Modes of thinking of living kinds. In Olson, D. R., and Torrance, N. (eds.), Modes of thought: explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 216–260). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atran, S., Medin, D. L., and Ross, N. O. (2005). The cultural mind: environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112(4), 744–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audi, R. (1997). The place of testimony in the fabric of knowledge and justification. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34(4), 405–422.Google Scholar
Audi, R. (2010). Epistemology: a contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auer, P., Couper-Kuhlen, E., and Müller, F. (1999). Language in time. The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, M. (1995). Social representations and ideology: towards the study of ideological representations. In Flick, U., and Moscovici, S. (eds.), The psychology of the social: language and social knowledge in social psychology (pp. 200–217). Reinbek: Ro.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, M., and Every, D. (2007). The language of “race” and prejudice: a discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustinos, M., and Reynolds, K. J. (eds.) (2001). Understanding prejudice, racism, and social conflict. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Augoustinos, M., LeCouteur, A., and Soyland, J. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the Stolen Generations. Discourse and Society, 13(1), 105–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augoustinos, N., Walker, I., and Donaghue, N. (2006). Social cognition: an integrated introduction, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1950). Truth. Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 24, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, A., Briejer, M., Hiernaux, P., Udo, H., and Tabo, R. (2008). Botanical knowledge and its differentiation by age, gender and ethnicity in Southwestern Niger. Human Ecology, 36(6), 881–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, R., and Jacobson, M. J. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: a summary and critical analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, A. (ed.) (2005). Getting real about knowledge networks: unlocking corporate knowledge assets. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (1994). The magical number 7: still magic after all these years. Psychological Review, 101(2), 353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., and Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 8 (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Conway, M., and Aggleton, J. (eds.) (2002). Episodic memory: new directions in research. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Baert, P., and Rubio, F. D. (eds.) (2012). The politics of knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.
Bahrick, H. P. (1984). Semantic memory content in permastore: fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahrick, H. P., and Hall, L. K. (1991). Lifetime maintenance of high-school mathematics content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L. D. (1998). From savage to Negro: anthropology and the construction of race, 1896–1954. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bal, M. (1985). Narratology: introduction to the theory of narrative. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bal, M. (ed.) (2004). Narrative theory: critical concepts in literary and cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge.
Bala, A., and Joseph, G. G. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and western science: the possibility of dialogue. Race and Class, 49(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballmer, T. T., and Pinkal, M. (eds.) (1983). Approaching vagueness. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
Barclay, C. R. (1993). Remembering ourselves. In Davies, G. M., and Logie, R. H. (eds.), Memory in everyday life. Advances in Psychology, vol. 100 (pp. 285–309). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendt, E. M. (1997). Libel and the media: the chilling effect. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barkan, E. (1992). Retreat of scientific racism: changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States between the world wars. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, F. M. (2006). Reason and self-enactment in history and politics: themes and voices of modernity. Montreal/Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: knowledge, higher education, and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., and Medin, D. L. (1986). Concepts: static definitions or context-dependent representations?Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 187–202.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., Graumann, C. F., Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.). (1989). Stereotyping and prejudice: changing conceptions. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group beliefs: a conception for analyzing group structure, processes and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Group beliefs as an expression of social identity. In Worchel, S., Morales, J. F., Paez, D., and Deschamps, J. C. (eds.), Social identity: international perspectives (pp. 93–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., and Kruglanski, A. (eds.) (1988). The social psychology of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Bartels-Tobin, L. R., and Hinckley, J. J. (2005). Cognition and discourse production in right hemisphere disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18(6), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomé, T., and Bromme, R. (2009). Coherence formation when learning from text and pictures: what kind of support for whom?Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 282–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barwise, J., and Perry, J. (1999). Situations and attitudes. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Co.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. J. (2007). Remembering the times of our lives: memory in infancy and beyond. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baum, M. (2003). Soft news goes to war: public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Beacco, J. C. (1999). L’astronomie dans les médias: analyses linguistiques de discours de vulgarisation. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar
Beaver, D. I. (2001). Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. Stanford, CA.CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., and Gromoll, E. W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6(2), 99–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, N. (2006). Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: a text-driven approach. Text and Talk, 26(6), 635–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, M., and Chiarello, C. E. (eds.) (1997). Right hemisphere language comprehension: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Beghtol, C. (1998). Knowledge domains: multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems. Knowledge Organization, 25(1–2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Beinhauer, M. (2004). Knowledge communities. Lohmar: Eul.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bell, A., and Garrett, P. (eds.) (1997). Approaches to media discourse. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Bell, A. R., Davies, A. R., and Mellor, F. (2008). Science and its publics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1988). Embattled reason: essays on social knowledge. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Benedict, R. (1935). Patterns of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., Lubben, F., Campbell, B., and Robinson, A. (2010). Talking science: the research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W. L., and Benoit, P. J. (2008). Persuasive messages: the process of influence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benson, S., and Standing, C. (2001). Effective knowledge management: knowledge, thinking and the personal–corporate knowledge nexus problem. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(2), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, C., and Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernecker, S., and Dretske, F. I. (eds.) (2000). Knowledge: readings in contemporary epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Bernstein, B. B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique. London/Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Berntsen, D., and Jacobsen, A. S. (2008). Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertuccelli-Papi, M. (2000). Implicitness in text and discourse. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A., and Cutting, J. C. (2002). Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2005). Vagueness in normative texts. Bern/New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C., and Dalla Chiara, M. L. (eds.) (1992). Knowledge, belief, and strategic interaction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Bicker, A., Sillitoe, P., and Pottier, J. (eds.) (2004). Development and local knowledge: new approaches to issues in natural resources management, conservation and agriculture. London/New York: Routledge.
Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and human behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s tongue: how humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Bickham, T. O. (2005). Savages within the empire: representations of American Indians in eighteenth-century Britain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bietenholz, P. G. (1994). Historia and fabula: myths and legends in historical thought from antiquity to the modern age. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1982). Ideology and social psychology: extremism, moderation, and contradiction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1989). Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (ed.) (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., and Radley, A.R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: a social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bischoping, K. (1993). Gender differences in conversation topics, 1922–1990. Sex Roles, 28(1–2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, A. (1996). Evolution and politics: how can the history of political thought educate us?University of Dundee, Dept. of Political Science and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Black, E. (1992). Rhetorical questions: studies of public discourse. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., and Wolter, F. (eds.) (2006), Handbook of modal logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Blackburn, S. (1985). Knowledge, truth and reliability. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S., and Simmons, K. (eds.) (1999). Truth. Oxford University Press.
Blanc, N., Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., and Brouillet, D. (2008). Updating situation models during reading of news articles: evidence from empirical data and simulations. Discourse Processes, 45, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. (1998). How we think they think: anthropological approaches to cognition, memory, and literacy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Blome-Tillmann, M. (2008). The indexicality of ‘knowledge.’Philosophical Studies, 138(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluck, S. (ed.) (2003). Autobiographical memory: exploring its functions in everyday life. Hove: Psychology Press.PubMed
Boas, F. (1911). The mind of primitive man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: organizations in action. London/Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boden, D. (1997). Temporal frames: time and talk in organizations. Time and Society, 6(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, D., and Bielby, D. D. (1986). The way it was: topical organization in elderly conversation. Language and Communication, 6(1–2), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, D., and Zimmerman, D. H. (eds.) (1991). Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bodner, G. E., and Lindsay, D. S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggs, J. P. (2002). Anthropological knowledge and native American cultural practice in the liberal polity. American Anthropologist, 104(2), 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohère, G. (1984). Profession, journalist: a study on the working conditions of journalists. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Boisvert, D., and Ludwig, K. (2006). Semantics for nondeclaratives. In Lepore, E., and Smith, B. C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of language (pp. 864–892). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boltz, M. G. (2005). Temporal dimensions of conversational interaction: the role of response latencies and pauses in social impression formation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(2), 103–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordia, P., Irmer, B. E., and Abusah, D. (2006). Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: the role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borge, S. (2007). Unwarranted questions and conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1689–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, P. (1984). Lexical learning, context dependence, and metaphor. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Boscolo, P., and Mason, L. (2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: how they interact in learning from instructional texts. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 126–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boster, J. S., Johnson, J. C., and Weller, S. C. (1987). Social position and shared knowledge: actors’ perceptions of status, role, and social structure. Social Networks, 9(4), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botzung, A., Denkova, E., and Manning, L. (2008). Experiencing past and future personal events: functional neuroimaging evidence on the neural bases of mental time travel. Brain and Cognition, 66(2), 202–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C., and Saint-Martin, M. (1994). Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (2009). Science for all: the popularization of science in early twentieth-century Britain. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, F. B., and Thompson, M. K. (2008). Multimodality and literacy learning: using multiple texts to enhance content-area learning. In Hinchman, K. A., and Sheridan-Thomas, H. K. (eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 151–163). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Boyd-Barrett, O., and Braham, P. (eds.) (1987). Media, knowledge, and power: a reader. London/Wolfeboro, NH: Croom Helm in association with the Open University.
Boye, K., and Harder, P. (2009). Evidentiality: linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language, 16(1), 9–43.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Branigan, E. (1984). Point of view in the cinema: a theory of narration and subjectivity in classical film. Berlin/New York: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., and Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bråten, I. (2008). Personal epistemology, understanding of multiple texts, and learning within internet technologies. In Khine, (ed.), (pp. 351–376).CrossRef
Bråten, I., Amundsen, A., and Samuelstuen, M. S. (2010). Poor readers – good learners: a study of dyslexic readers learning with and without text. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 26(2), 166–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breakwell, G. M., and Canter, D. V. (eds.) (1993). Empirical approaches to social representations. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Brewer, M. B. (2003). Intergroup relations. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., and Hewstone, M. (eds.) (2003). Self and social identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Briggs, R. (1989). Communities of belief: cultural and social tension in early modern France. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Briley, D. A., and Aaker, J. L. (2006). When does culture matter? Effects of personal knowledge on the correction of culture-based judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briner, S. W., Virtue, S., and Kurby, C. A. (2012). Processing causality in narrative events: temporal order matters. Discourse Processes, 49(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, J. H., Timms, E., and Rock, S. (eds.) (2006). Nationalist myths and modern media: contested identities in the age of globalization. London/New York: Tauris Academic Studies.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., and Rouet, J. F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In Goldman, , Graesser, , and van den Broek, (eds.) (pp. 209–233).
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., Georgi, M. C., and Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Learning from history texts: from causal analysis to argument models. In Leinhardt, G., Beck, I. L., and Stainton, C. (eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 47–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Britton, B. K. (ed.) (1984). Understanding expository text: a theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britton, B. K., and Black, J. B. (eds.) (1985). Understanding expository text: a theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britton, B. K., Woodward, A., and Binkley, M. R. (eds.) (1993). Learning from textbooks: theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britton, B. K., Stimson, M., Stennett, B., and Gülgöz, S. (1998). Learning from instructional text: test of an individual-differences model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 476–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brøgger, J. (1986). Belief and experience among the Sidano: a case study towards an anthropology of knowledge. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Brokensha, D., Warren, D. M., and Werner, O. (eds.) (1980). Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Brothers, L. (1997). Friday’s footprint: how society shapes the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J., and Gerken, M. (eds.) (2012). Knowledge ascriptions. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Brown, J. W. (1991). Self and process: brain states and the conscious present. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (ed.) (2001). Intergroup processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Brown, R., and Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–277). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brownell, H., and Friedman, O. (2001). Discourse ability in patients with unilateral left and right hemisphere brain damage. In Berndt, R. S. (ed.), Handbook of neuropsychology, 2nd edn., vol. 3: Language and aphasia (pp. 189–203). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Brownell, H., and Joanette, Y. (1990). Discourse ability and brain damage: theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Brueckner, A., and Ebbs, G. (2012). Debating self-knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: law, literature, life. New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., and Ventola, E. (1999). Coherence in spoken and written discourse: how to create it and how to describe it, selected papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg, April 24–27, 1997. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucchi, M., and Trench, B. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. New York: Routledge.
Bucholtz, M. (ed.) (1994). Cultural performances. Proceedings of the third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, April 8, 9, and 10, 1994. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Bukobza, G. (2008). The development of knowledge structures in adulthood. In Columbus, A. M. (ed.), Advances in psychology research, vol. 54 (pp. 199–228). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Bultman, D. C., and Svarstad, B. L. (2000). Effects of physician communication style on client medication beliefs and adherence with antidepressant treatment. Patient Education and Counseling, 40(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, T. E. (1995). Questions of belief. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Burnstein, E., and Sentis, K. (1981). Attitude polarization in groups, In Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Buskes, C. (1998). The genealogy of knowledge: a Darwinian approach to epistemology and philosophy of science. Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, K. R., and Kintsch, W. (2003). Text comprehension and discourse processing. In Healy, A. F., and Proctor, R. W. (eds.), Handbook of psychology: experimental psychology, vol. 4 (pp. 575–595). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Butt, D., Bywater, J., and Paul, N. (eds.) (2008). Place: local knowledge and new media practice. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Buus, N. (2008). Negotiating clinical knowledge: a field study of psychiatric nurses’ everyday communication. Nursing Inquiry, 15(3), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bybee, J., and Fleischman, S. (eds.) (1995). Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., and Tapiero, I. (1997). Text structures and prior knowledge. L’Année Psychologique, 97(4), 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., Denhière, G., and Kintsch, W. (2002). The effect of prior knowledge on understanding from text: evidence from primed recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calisir, F., and Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading-comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calisir, F., Eryazici, M., and Lehto, M. R. (2008). The effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on computer-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, D., and Drum, P. A. (1984). Reading ability and prior knowledge as predictors of eleven and twelve year olds’ text comprehension. Reading Psychology, 5(1–2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callebaut, W., and Pinxten, R. (eds.) (1987). Evolutionary epistemology: a multiparadigm program. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRef
Calsamiglia, H., and van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse and Society, 15(4), 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, S. A., and Meinhof, U. H. (eds.), Masculinity and language (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2006). Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said. Mind and Language, 21(3), 280–309.Google Scholar
Canary, H. E., and McPhee, R. (eds.) (2010). Communication and organizational knowledge: contemporary issues for theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
Canisius, P. (1987). Perspektivität in Sprache und Text. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Cantor, N. (1980). Perceptions of situations: situation prototypes and person-situation prototypes. ln Magnusson, D. (ed.), The situation: an interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cantor, N., and Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 4–47.Google Scholar
Capozza, D., and Brown, R. (eds.) (2000). Social identity processes: trends in theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cappelen, H., and Lepore, E. (2005). Insensitive semantics: a defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., and Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 354–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carayannis, E. G., and Alexander, J. M. (2005). Global and local knowledge: glocal transatlantic public–private partnerships for research and technological development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (eds.) (2006). Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Carey, S. (1996). Cognitive domains as modes of thought. In Olson, D. R., and Torrance, N. (eds.), Modes of thought: explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 187–215). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlsen, W. S. (1997). Never ask a question if you don’t know the answer: the tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 14–23.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1956). Meaning and necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carney, R. N., and Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. E., and Müller, U. E. (2004). Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carr, M., Mizelle, N. B., and Charak, D. (1998). Motivation to read and learn from text. In Stahl, Steven A., and Hynd, Cynthia R., (eds.), Learning from text across conceptual domains (pp. 45–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carroll, W., and Seng, M. (2003). Eyewitness testimony: strategies and tactics. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2009). How do we know our own minds: the relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 121–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carston, R., and Uchida, S. (eds.) (1998). Relevance theory: applications and implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Caspari, I., and Parkinson, S. R. (2000). Effects of memory impairment on discourse. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, E. J. (1985). Talking with patients. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1955). Mythical thought. New Haven, NY: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, S., Lopez, M., and Romero, M. (1987). The role of five induced-learning strategies in scientific text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Education, 55(3), 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catt, I. E., and Eicher-Catt, D. (eds.) (2010). Communicology: the new science of embodied discourse. Madison, NJ: Fairleight Dickinson University Press.
Caughlin, J. P., and Afifi, T. D. (2004). When is topic avoidance unsatisfying? Examining moderators of the association between avoidance and dissatisfaction. Human Communication Research, 30(4), 479–513.Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., and Golish, T. D. (2002). An analysis of the association between topic avoidance and dissatisfaction: comparing perceptual and interpersonal explanations. Communication Monographs, 69(4), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., and Petronio, S. (2004). Privacy in families. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 379–412). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1972). Discourse structure and human knowledge. In Freedle, R. O., and Carroll, J. B. (eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 41–70). New York: Winston.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language 50, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 27–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (ed.) (1980). The Pear Stories: cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L., and Nichols, J. (eds.) (1986). Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corp.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. K., and André, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct-current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, R. A. (1992). The structuralists on myth: an introduction. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Chan, C. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29(6), 443–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. K., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. C., and Keisler, H. J. (1973). Model theory. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland/American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. B., Highley, A. P., and Thompson, J. L. (1998). Discourse in fluent aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease: linguistic and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(1–2), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez, L. R., McMullin, J. M., Mishra, S. I., and Hubbell, F. A. (2001). Beliefs matter: cultural beliefs and the use of cervical cancer-screening tests. American Anthropologist, 103(4), 1114–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chen, W. L., and Looi, C. K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: a new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenail, R. J., and Morris, G. H. (eds.) (1995). The talk of the clinic: explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chinn, C. A., O’Donnell, A. M., and Jinks, T. S. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, W. (ed.) (1984). Interrogativity: a colloquium on the grammar, typology, and pragmatics of questions in seven diverse languages, Cleveland, Ohio, October 5th, 1981-May 3rd, 1982. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Chomsky, N. (1987). On power and ideology: the Managua lectures. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., and Kirby, S. (eds.) (2003). Language evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefPubMed
Chua, L., High, C., and Lau, T. (eds.) (2008). How do we know? Evidence, ethnography, and the making of anthropological knowledge. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Cicourel, A. V. (1981). Notes on the Integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis. In Cetina, K. Knorr, and Cicourel, A. V. (eds.) Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 51–80). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clariana, R. B., and Marker, A. W. (2007). Generating topic headings during reading of screen-based text facilitates learning of structural knowledge and impairs learning of lower-level knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (ed.) (1988). Social interaction: readings in sociology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., and Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A. K., Webber, B., and Sag, I. (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E., and Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning presidents: journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press-conferences of US presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 749–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clift, R. (2006). Indexing stance: reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clift, R. (2012). Who Knew? A view from linguistics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: a philosophical study. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coburn, D., and Willis, E. (2000). The medical profession: knowledge, power, and autonomy. In Albrecht, G. L., Fitzpatrick, R., and Scrimshaw, S. C. (eds.), The handbook of social studies in health and medicine (pp. 377–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffe, H., and Geys, B. (2006). Community heterogeneity: a burden for the creation of social capital?Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 1053–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. (2010). Anthropology of knowledge. In Marchand, (ed.) (pp. 183–192).CrossRef
Cohen, E. D. (ed.) (2005). News incorporated: corporate media ownership and its threat to democracy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. S., and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.) (1983). Epistemology, methodology, and the social sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRef
Cohen, S. (1987). Knowledge, context, and social standards. Synthese, 73, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, E. B., Brown, A. L., and Rivkin, I. D. (1997). The effect of instructional explanations on learning from scientific texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, L., and Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: the English verb ‘lie.’Language, 57(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (ed.) (2012). The self and self-knowledge. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Collins, A. M., and Quillian, M. R. (1972). Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. In Gregg, L. W. (ed.), Cognition in learning and memory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Colson, E. (1953). The Makah Indians: a study of an Indian tribe in modern American society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M. (1999). How the public understands genetics: nondeterministic and nondiscriminatory interpretations of the blueprint metaphor. Public Understanding of Science, 8(3), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, H. C. (1962). Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In Household, F. W., and Saporta, S. (eds.), Problems in Lexicography. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Connelly, F. M., and Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: stories of educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A. (ed.) (2007). Variation in working memory. Oxford University Press.
Conway, M. A. (1990). Autobiographical memory: an introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, M. A. (ed.) (1997). Cognitive models of memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Conway, M. A., Cohen, G., and Stanhope, N. (1992). Very long-term memory for knowledge acquired at school and university. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(6), 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, T. E. (1989). Making laws and making news: media strategies in the US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. A., and Johnson, M. (2009). Representative reporters? Examining journalists’ ideology in context. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. E. (1974). Presupposition. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Copney, C. V. (1998). Jamaican culture and international folklore, superstitions, beliefs, dreams, proverbs, and remedies. Raleigh, NC: Pentland Press.Google Scholar
Corlett, J. A. (1996). Analyzing social knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cormack, A. (1998). Definitions: implications for syntax, semantics, and the language of thought. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B. (2007). Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-) auxiliaries: a cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B. (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: on the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16(1), 44–62.Google Scholar
Cortese, G., and Duszak, A. (2005). Identity, community, discourse: English in intercultural settings. Bern/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1998). The handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, H. (ed.) (2000). Social interaction in learning and instruction the meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge. Oxford/New York: Pergamon.
Cowie, H., and van der Aalsvoort, G. (eds.) (2000). Social interaction in learning and instruction: the meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge. Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
Cox, O. C. (1970). Caste, class, and race: a study in social dynamics. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Crane, T. (2009). Intentionalism. In McLaughlin, B. P., Beckermann, A., Walter, S. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind (pp. 474–493). Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cranefield, J., and Yoong, P. (2009). Crossings: embedding personal professional knowledge in a complex online community environment. Online Information Review, 33(2), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. (1985). Structured meanings: the semantics of propositional attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crick, M. R. (1982). Anthropology of knowledge. Annual Review of Anthropology, 11, 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, M. (1992). Talk about beliefs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, A., and Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A., and Andrews, B. (1997). Western medicine as contested knowledge. New York: Manchester University Press, distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. E., and Petras, J. W. (eds.) (1970). The sociology of knowledge: a reader. London: Duckworth.
Custers, E. J. F. M. (2010). Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutica, I., and Bucciarelli, M. (2008). The deep versus the shallow: effects of co-speech gestures in learning from discourse. Cognitive Science, 32(5), 921–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, B. L. (2002). Eyewitness testimony: challenging your opponent’s witness. Notre Dame: National Institute for Trial Advocacy, Notre Dame Law School.Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L. (ed.) (2009). Expert testimony on the psychology of eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Cutting, J. (2000). Analysing the language of discourse communities. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Costa, A. L. (1980). News values and principles of cross-cultural communication. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1974). Topic and comment, contextual boundness and focus. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, A. C., and Trygger, S. B. (2009). Indigenous medicine and primary health care: the importance of lay knowledge and use of medicinal plants in rural South Africa. Human Ecology, 37(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailey, R. M., and Palomares, N. A. (2004). Strategic topic avoidance: an investigation of topic avoidance frequency, strategies used, and relational correlates. Communication Monographs, 71(4), 471–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R. (1992). Generating referring expressions: constructing descriptions in a domain of objects and processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, J. (2009). Cloaked websites: propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era. New Media and Society, 11(5), 659–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, B. (2002). A model for the construction of conversational common ground in interpreted discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(9), 1273–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford University Press (Clarendon).Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1996). The folly of trying to define truth. Journal of Philosophy, 93(6), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (2005), Truth and predication. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A., and Wagner, J. R. (2003). Who knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology, 31(3), 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, O. L. J., Hicks, L. C., and Bowers, N. D. (1966). The usefulness of time lines in learning chronological relationships in text materials. Journal of Experimental Education, 34(3), 22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. (2002). Conversation, epistemology and norms. Mind and Language, 17(5), 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S., and Gillon, B. S. (eds.) (2004). Semantics: a reader. Oxford University Press.
Davis, W. A. (1998). Implicature: intention, convention, and principle in the failure of Gricean theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. A. (2004). Are knowledge claims indexical? (David Lewis, Stewart Cohen, and Keith DeRose). Erkenntnis, 61(2–3), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M. A. (1937). Children’s preferences for conversational topics. The Elementary School Journal, 37, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. (1984). Text production: toward a science of composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
De Condillac, B. (1746). Essai sur I'origine des connoissances humaines. Ouvrage où I'on réduit a un seul principe tout ce qui concerne I'entendement human: première partie. Amsterdam: Chez Pierre Mortier.Google Scholar
De Mente, B. (2009). The Chinese mind: understanding traditional Chinese beliefs and their influence on contemporary culture. North Clarendon, VT: Tuttle.Google Scholar
De Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., and Oostenveld, W. (2010). Leadership = communication? The relations of leaders’ communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 367–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vries, R. E., van den Hooff, B., and de Ridder, J. A. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing: the role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Deaux, K., and Philogène, G. (eds.) (2001). Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell.
DeConcini, B. (1990). Narrative remembering. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Dee-Lucas, D., and di Vesta, F. J. (1980). Learner-generated organizational aids: effects on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee-Lucas, D., and Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 431–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deemter, K., and Kibble, R. (2002). Information sharing: reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
DeGenaro, W. (ed.) (2007). Who says? Working-class rhetoric, class consciousness, and community. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, K. (2009). The case for contextualism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuze, M. (2005). Popular journalism and professional ideology: tabloid reporters and editors speak out. Media Culture and Society, 27(6), 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, D. J. (1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30(5), 608–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Leonardo, M. (ed.) (1991). Gender at the crossroads of knowledge: feminist anthropology in the postmodern era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Kendeou, P., and Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: the effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G., and Smirnova, E. (2010). Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M. S., Allen, R. S., and Burgio, L. D. (2004). Conversational coherence: discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(4), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. (1973). Rules and meaning: the anthropology of everyday knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.) (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. New York: Academic Press.
Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., and Rudman, L. A. (eds). (2005). On the nature of prejudice: fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRef
Downing, J. D. H., and Husband, C. (2005). Representing race: racisms, ethnicities and media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. I. (2000). Perception, knowledge, and belief. Selected essays. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. (2003). Precision and exaggeration in interaction. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 917–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P., and Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge University Press.
Druckman, D. (2003). Linking micro and macro-level processes: interaction analysis in context. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14(3), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1996). Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 475–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duek, J. E. (2000). Whose group is it anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL). In Hmelo, C. E., and Evensen, D. H., Problem-based learning, a research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 75–107). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duell, O. K. (1984). The effects of test expectations based upon goals on the free recall of learning from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9(2), 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, M. C., Hengst, J. A., Tranel, D., and Cohen, N. J. (2008). Collaborative discourse facilitates efficient communication and new learning in amnesia. Brain and Language, 106(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dummett, M. A. E. (1978). Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1986). Essays on individualism: modern ideology in anthropological perspective. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., and Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. (2001a). Properties of greetings. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader (pp. 208–238). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (ed.) (2001b). Key terms in language and culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Duranti, A. (ed.) (2004). A companion to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (2002[2010]). Le problème sociologique de la connaissance. Chicoutimi: J.-M. Tremblay.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutke, S. (1996). Generic and generative knowledge: memory schemata in the construction of mental models. In Battmann, W., and Dutke, S. (eds.), Processes of the molar regulation of behavior (pp. 35–54). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. L., and McGoodwin, J. R. (1994). Folk management in the world’s fisheries: lessons for modern fisheries management. Niwiot, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Dymock, S. J. (1999). Learning about text structure. In Thompson, G. B., and Nicholson, T. (eds.), Learning to read: beyond phonics and whole language (pp. 174–192). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: an introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M., and Lyles, M. A. (eds.) (2011). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Chichester, West Sussex/Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Ecarma, R. E. (2003). Beyond ideology: a case of egalitarian bias in the news?Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., and Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: experiencing commonality with other’s inner states about the world. Perspective on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, G. R., and Rollins, P. C. (eds.) (2001). Television histories: shaping collective memory in the media age. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Edson, G. (2009). Shamanism: a cross-cultural study of beliefs and practices. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., and Davis, B. (1997). Learning from classroom questions and answers: teachers’ uncertainties about children’s language. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(4), 471–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Egan, A. (2007). Epistemic modals, relativism and assertion. Philosophical Studies, 133(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S., and Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London/New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Ehrich, V., and Koster, C. (1983). Discourse organization and sentence form: the structure of room descriptions in Dutch. Discourse Processes, 6(2), 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, M. F., Tardieu, H., and Cavazza, M. (1993). Les modèles mentaux: approche cognitive de représentations. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Eiser, J. R., Claessen, M. J. A., and Loose, J. J. (1998). Attitudes, beliefs, and other minds: shared representations in self-organizing systems. In Read, Stephen J., and Miller, Lynn C. (eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. (1961). The sacred and the profane: the nature of religion. New York: Harper & Row (Harper Torchbooks/The Cloister Library).Google Scholar
Ellen, R. (2011). “Indigenous knowledge” and the understanding of cultural cognition: the contribution of studies of environmental knowledge systems. In Kronenfeld, , Bennardo, , de Munck, , and Fischer, (eds.) (pp. 290–313).CrossRef
Ellen, R., Parkes, P., and Bicker, A. (eds.) (2000). Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Ellis, C. (1989). Expert knowledge and explanation: the knowledge–language interface. Chichester, UK/New York:E. Horwood/Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. G. (1999). Research on social-interaction and the micro–macro issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endriss, C., and Hinterwimmer, S. (2008). Direct and indirect aboutness topics. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2011). Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In Stivers, , Mondada, , and Steensig, (eds.) (2011b) (pp. 285–312).CrossRef
Engelke, M. E. (ed.) (2009). The objects of evidence: anthropological approaches to the production of knowledge. Chichester, UK/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Engelstad, E., and Gerrard, S. (2005). Challenging situatedness: gender, culture and the production of knowledge. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Englander, D. (ed.) (1990). Culture and belief in Europe, 1450–1600: an anthology of sources. Oxford: Blackwell.
Englebretsen, G. (2006). Bare facts and truth: an essay on the correspondence theory of truth. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London/Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. (1988). Discourse coherence, participation structure, and personal display in a family dinner table conversation. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 4, 1–26.Google Scholar
Ericson, R. V., Baranek, P. M., and Chan, J. B. L. (1989). Negotiating control: a study of news sources. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., and Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erman, B. (2001). Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(9), 1337–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: the syntax-discourse interface. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1997). Anthropology and development. International Social Science Journal, 49(4), 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and knowledges otherwise: the Latin American modernity/coloniality research program. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essed, P. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: an interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eveland, W. R., Marton, K., and Seo, M. Y. (2004). Moving beyond “just the facts”: the influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Communication Research, 31(1), 82–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, B. I., Leinbach, M. D., Hort, B. E., and Strayer, J. (1997). Qualities underlying the definitions of gender. Sex Roles, 37(1–2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faller, M. (2006). Evidentiality and epistemic modality at the semantics/pragmatics interface. Paper presented at the 2006 Workshop on Philosophy and Linguistics, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Fals-Borda, O. (1991). Knowledge and social movements. Santa Cruz, CA: Merrill.Google Scholar
Fanselow, G. (2008). In need of mediation: the relation between syntax and information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fardon, R. (1985). Power and knowledge: anthropological and sociological approaches. Proceedings of a conference held at the University of St. Andrews in December 1982. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fardon, R. (ed.) (1995). Counterworks: managing the diversity of knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Farr, R. M., and Moscovici, S. (eds.) (1984). Social representations. Cambridge University Press.
Farrell, L. (2006). Making knowledge common: literacy and knowledge at work. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Feltham, C. (1996). Beyond denial, myth and superstition in the counselling profession. In Bayne, R., and Horton, I. (eds.), New directions in counselling (pp. 297–308). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferguson, H. J., and Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: an eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. S. (2000). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E., and Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). The role of prior knowledge in inferential processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 15(1), 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, E. C., and Speer, J. H. (eds.) (1992). Performance, culture, and identity. New York: Praeger.
Finucane, R. C. (1995). Miracles and pilgrims: popular beliefs in medieval England. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
First, M. B., and Pincus, H. A. (1999). Definitions of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S., and Todd, A. (eds.) (1983). The social organization of doctor–patient communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Distributed by Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (2007). Social cognition: from brain to culture, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fivush, R., and Hudson, J. A. (eds.) (1990). Knowing and remembering in young children. Cambridge University Press.
Flick, U. (1998). Everyday knowledge in social psychology. In Flick, U. (ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 41–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., and Leong, S. (2010). Presumed knowledge in the discursive construction of socio-political and cultural identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2240–2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: discourse and ideology in the press. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fox, B. A. (2001). Evidentiality: authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 11(2), 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, E. (2009). The role of reader characteristics in processing and learning from informational text. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 197–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, J. E., and Schrock, J. C. (2002). Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 727–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frandji, D., and Vitale, P. (eds.) (2010). Knowledge, pedagogy, and society: international perspectives on Basil Bernstein’s sociology of education. Abingdon, Oxon/New York: Routledge.
Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., Auble, P. M., Mezynski, K. J., Perfetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., Stein, B. S., and Littlefield, J. (1982). Learning from explicit versus implicit texts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(4), 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C., and Gaskell, G. (eds.) (1990). The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Frazer, J. G. (1910). Questions on the customs, beliefs, and languages of savages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frechie, S., Halbert, H. W., and McCormick, C. (2005). The newspaper reader. New Jersey: Pearson–Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, C. H. (1999). Learning to reason through discourse in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory: a conceptual approach. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (ed.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Freedle, R. O. (1977). Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: a study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (2006). Second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3), 592–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, W. J. (2007). The role of reminding in long-term memory for temporal order. Memory and Cognition, 35(1), 66–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fröhlich, R., and Holtz-Bacha, C. (eds.) (2003). Journalism education in Europe and North America: an international comparison. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Fuller, J. (1996). News values: ideas for an information age. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2002). Social epistemology, 2nd edn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Personality, intelligence and general knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Christopher, A. N., Garwood, J., and Martin, G. N. (2007). Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbard, D. (ed.) (2000). Knowledge and power in the global economy: politics and the rhetoric of school reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gagné, E. D., and Rothkopf, E. Z. (1975). Text organization and learning goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, I., and Nigro, G. (1990). Les représentations sociales: la question de la genèse. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 3(3), 429–450.Google Scholar
Gallini, J. K., Seaman, M. A., and Terry, S. (1995). Metaphors and learning new text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(2), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, J. K., Spires, H. A., Terry, S., and Gleaton, J. (1993). The influence of macro and micro-level cognitive strategies training on text learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(3), 164–178.Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. (ed.) (1992). Animal cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Galtung, J., and Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research 2, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: a study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, M., and Kölbel, M. (eds.) (2008). Relative truth. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Garfinkel, H. (1962). Common sense knowledge of social structures: the documentary method of lay/professional fact finding. In Scher, J. M. (ed.), Theories of the mind (pp. 689–712). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., and White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A. (1987). Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Chichester, West Sussex, England/New York: E. Horwood Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Gaskell, G., and Fraser, C. (1990). The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. In Fraser, C., and Gaskell, G. (eds.), The social psychological study of widespread beliefs (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gaunt, P. (1992). Making the newsmakers: international handbook on journalism training. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gavin, H. (1998). The essence of cognitive psychology. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1977). Implicature, presupposition and logical form. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition and logical form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2005). Folk knowledge and academic learning. In Ellis, B. J., and Bjorklund, D. F. (eds.), Origins of the social mind: evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 493–519). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P., and Handford, M. (eds.) (2012). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: further essays in interpretative anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geluykens, R. (1984). Focus phenomena in English: an empirical investigation into cleft and pseudo-cleft sentences. Wilrijk, Belgium: Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Departement Germaanse, Afdeling Lingüistiek.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: an essay in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. L. (eds.) (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gerbner, G. (1988). Violence and terror in the mass media. Paris, France/Lanham, MD: Unesco/UNIPUB.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., and Givón, T. (eds.) (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Gernsbacher, M. A., and Robertson, D. A. (2005). Watching the brain comprehend discourse. In Healy, A. F. (ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 157–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1987). Relevance theory, mutual knowledge, and accidental irrelevance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10(4), 717–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., and Prentice, D. A. (1991). The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2, 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, B. (ed.) (2003). Privileged access: philosophical accounts of self-knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Geurts, B., and van der Sandt, R. (2004). Interpreting focus. Theoretical Linguistics, 30(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1987). Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(5), 561–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., and Gerrig, R. J. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.” Special Issue: Context and metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4(3), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The theory of affordances. In Gibson, J. J. (ed.), The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 127–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J., Huemer, W., and Pocci, L. (eds.) (2007). Fiction, narrative, and knowledge: a sense of world. London/New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gigone, D., and Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 959–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilles, V. E., and Lucey, H. E. (2008). Power, knowledge and the academy: the institutional is political. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gillett, G. (2003). Form and content: the role of discourse in mental disorder. In Fulford, K. W. M. B., Morris, K., Sadler, J. Z., and Stanghellini, G. (eds.), Nature and narrative: an introduction to the new philosophy of psychiatry (pp. 139–153). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code, and context: essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2005). Context as other minds: the pragmatics of sociality, cognition and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givry, D., and Roth, W. M. (2006). Toward a new conception of conceptions: interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1086–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow University Media Group (1976). Bad news. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Glasgow University Media Group (1980). More bad news. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Glasgow University Media Group (1982). Really bad news. London: Writers & Readers.Google Scholar
Glasgow University Media Group (1985). War and peace news. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Glasser, C. J. (ed.) (2009). International libel and privacy handbook: a global reference for journalists, publishers, webmasters, and lawyers. New York: Bloomberg Press.
Glenberg, A. (1999). Why mental models must be embodied. In Rickheit, , and Habel, (eds.) (pp. 77–90).CrossRef
Gluckman, M. (1963). Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 4(3), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, S. M., and Takahashi, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1129–1149.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goldenweiser, A. A. (1915). The knowledge of primitive man. American Anthropologist, New Series, 17(2), 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1992). Liaisons: philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1993). Philosophical applications of cognitive science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford, UK/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2002). Pathways to knowledge: private and public. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 357–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. R., and Bisanz, G. L. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: implications for understanding and learning processes. In Leon, Jose A., and Otero, Jose (eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., and Rakestraw, J. A. J. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In Kamil, Michael L., and Mosenthal, Peter B. (eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 3 (pp. 311–335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., and Varma, S. (1995). CAPping the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. In Weaver, C., Mannes, S., and Fletcher, C. (eds.), Discourse comprehension: essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 337–358). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., and van den Broek, P. (eds.) (1999). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Good, B. (1994). Medicine, rationality, and experience: an anthropological perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. (1964). Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology (pp. 36–39). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goody, E. N. (ed.) (1978). Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Goodyear, P., and Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, D. (1997). Modeling discourse topic: sequential relations and strategies in expository text. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news: how people tame the information tide. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Graber, D. A. (2001). Processing politics: learning from television in the Internet age. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., and Bower, G. H. (eds.) (1990). Inferences and text comprehension: the psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 25. New York: Academic Press.
Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., and Goldman, S. R. (eds.) (2003). Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Graetz, B. (1986). Social structure and class consciousness: facts, fictions and fantasies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. J. (2000). Transferring knowledge. Nous, 34(1), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. (2010). Achieving knowledge: a virtue-theoretic account of epistemic normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J., and Sosa, E. (eds.) (1999). The Blackwell guide to epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Greenberg, G., and Tobach, E. (eds.) (1990). Theories of the evolution of knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Greene, J. O., and Cappella, J. N. (1986). Cognition and talk: the relationship of semantic units to temporal patterns of fluency in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 29(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, S. (2009). The anthropology of magic. Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Gregory, J., and Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: communication, culture and credibility. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 68–134). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, J. A. G., de Jongh, D., and Stokhof, M. B. J. (1987). Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn: beyond political-economy paradigms. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. (1993). Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics, 3(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubrium, J. F., and Holstein, J. A. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéraud, S., Harmon, M. E., and Peracchi, K. A. (2005). Updating situation models: the memory-based contribution. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilhon, B. (ed.) (2001). Technology and markets for knowledge: knowledge creation, diffusion, and exchange within a growing economy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Gumperz, J. J. (1962). Types of linguistic community. Anthropological Linguistics 4, 28–40.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (ed.) (1982b). Language and social identity. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J., and Hymes, D. (eds.) (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gumperz, J. J., and Levinson, S. C. (eds.) (1994). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1988). The interrelations between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts. Instructional Science, 17(3), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Notions and subnotions in information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzetti, B. J. (2001). Texts and talk: the role of gender in learning physics. In Moje, E. B., and O’Brien, D. G. (eds.), Constructions of literacy: studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. 125–146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Haarmann, H. (2007). Foundations of culture: knowledge-construction, belief systems and worldview in their dynamic interplay. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Haas, A., and Sherman, M. A. (1982). Conversational topic as a function of role and gender. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 453–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hachten, W. A., and Scotton, J. F. (2002). The world news prism: global media in an era of terrorism. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press.Google Scholar
Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.) (2010). Social epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Haenggi, D., and Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Individual differences in reprocessing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, T. A., and Grinstein, J. (1997). The mythology of aggregate corporate knowledge: a deconstruction. George Washington Law Review, 65(2), 210–247.Google Scholar
Haghighat, C. (1988). Le racisme “scientifique”: offensive contre l’égalité sociale. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Hahlweg, K., and Hooker, C. A. (eds.) (1989). Issues in evolutionary epistemology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hajičová, E., Partee, B. H., and Sgall, P. (eds.) (1996). Discourse and meaning. Papers in honor of Eva Hajičová. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T., and Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Critical intercultural communication studies: at a crossroads. In Nakayama, and Halualani, (eds.), (pp. 1–16).CrossRef
Hambrick, D. Z., Meinz, E. J., and Oswald, F. L. (2007). Individual differences in current events knowledge: contributions of ability, personality, and interests. Memory and Cognition, 35(2), 304–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hames, R. (2007). The ecologically noble savage debate. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 177–190.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. (1974). Knowledge and social structure: an introduction to the classical argument in the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. J. (1997). Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 299–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, P. (2011). Structured propositions as types. Mind, 120, 11–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1989). Text and textuality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, F. A. (1979). Does God have a body? Truth, reality and cultural relativism. Man, 14(3), 515–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, D. H. (1984). Teachers’ questions: open, closed and half-open. Educational Research, 26(1), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harindranath, R. (2009). Audience–citizens: the media, public knowledge and interpretive practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Harp, S. F., and Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. (ed.) (2007). Ways of knowing: anthropological approaches to crafting experience and knowledge. New York: Berghahn Books.
Hart, C. (2011). Legitimizing assertions and the logico-rhetorical module: evidence and epistemic vigilance in media discourse on immigration. Discourse Studies, 13(6), 751–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, P. G., and Husband, C. (1974). Racism and the mass media: a study of the role of the mass media in the formation of white beliefs and attitudes in Britain. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, N. (2007). Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: an interview-based study of ‘I’ and ‘we.’Text and Talk, 27(1), 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, R., Park, B., and Weber, R. (1984). Social memory. In Wyer, , and Srull, (eds.), vol. 2 (pp. 151–212).
Haugeland, J. (1998). Having thought: essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Havens, N., and Ashida, T. (1994). Folk beliefs in modern Japan. Tokyo: Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. (1987). Fighting words: evidential particles, affect and argument. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Haworth, K. (2006). The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse and Society, 17(6), 739–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlehurst, B. (2011). The distributed cognition model of mind. In Kronenfeld, , Bennardo, , de Munck, , and Fischer, (eds.) (pp. 471–488).CrossRef
Hazlett, A. (2009). Knowledge and conversation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(3), 591–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, S. J. (1986). Hermeneutics and the sociology of knowledge. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Heldner, M., and Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction. In Stivers, , Mondada, and Steensig, (eds.) (2011b) (pp. 42–68).CrossRef
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J., and Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, D. (ed.) (2003). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W., and Jonas, K. (eds.) (2008). Introduction to social psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Heydon, G. (2005). The language of police interviewing: a critical analysis. Houndsmill: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidi, S. E. (1995). A reexamination of the role of attention in learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., and Vedder, P. (2006). The relationship between the quality of cooperative learning, students’ goal preferences, and perceptions of contextual factors in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, J. H., and Irvine, J. T. (eds.) (1993). Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Hill, J. H., and Mannheim, B. (1992). Language and world view. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelweit, H. T. (1990). Societal psychology: implications and scope. In Himmelweit, , and Gaskell, (eds.) (pp. 17–45).
Himmelweit, H. T., and Gaskell, G. (eds.) (1990). Societal psychology. London: Sage.
Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse. Report No. CSLI-85–37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.) (2002). Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hoffmann, G. A. (2007). The semantic theory of truth: Field’s incompleteness objection. Philosophia, 35(2), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D. (eds.) (2001). Intergroup relations: essential readings. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Holland, D., and Quinn, N. (eds.) (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Holstein, J. A., and Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., and Gordon, P. C. (1984). Information processing and social cognition. In Wyer, , and Srull, (eds.), vol. 1.
Holyoak, K. J., and Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hood, B. M., and Santos, L. (eds.) (2009). The origins of object knowledge. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Hopper, R. (ed.) (1991). Ethnography and conversation analysis after Talking Culture. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24, 161–387.CrossRef
Horowitz, M. H., Milbrath, C., Reidbord, S., and Stinson, C. (1993). Elaboration and dyselaboration: measures of expression and defense in discourse. Psychotherapy Research, 3(4), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, W. S., and Gerrig, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96(2), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, W. S., and Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground?Cognition, 59(1), 91–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, J. A., and Sternberg, R. J. (eds.) (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Horwich, P. (1990). Truth. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hosseini, S. A. H. (2010). Alternative globalizations: an integrative approach to studying dissident knowledge in the global justice movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hotter, M., and Tancred, P. (eds.) (1993). Engendering knowledge: the impact of feminism on the academy. Montreal: McGill Centre for Research and Teaching on Women.
Hudson, J. A., and Nelson, K. (1986). Repeated encounters of a similar kind – effects of familiarity on children’s autobiographical memory. Cognitive Development, 3, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C., and Dunn, J. (1998). Understanding mind and emotion: longitudinal associations with mental-state talk between young friends. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 1026–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, G., and Cresswell, M. (1968). An introduction to modal logic. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hulteng, J. L. (1979). The news media: what makes them tick?. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hultman, G., and Horberg, C. R. (1998). Knowledge competition and personal ambition: a theoretical framework for knowledge utilization and action in context. Science Communication, 19(4), 328–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1750). Philosophical essays concerning human understanding. London: A. Millar.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T., and Sturtevant, W. C. (eds.), Anthropology and Human Behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1972). Reinventing anthropology. New York: Vintage Books.
Hymes, D. (1974). Ways of speaking. In Bauman, R., and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 433–451). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, Linguistics, narrative inequality: toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, J., and Jarvis, B. (2012). Rational imagination and modal knowledge. Nous, 46(1), 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iding, M. K. (1997). How analogies foster learning from science texts. Instructional Science, 25(4), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, C. (1994). What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ismael, J. T. (2007). The situated self. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2003). Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, F. (2002). Language, thought and the epistemic theory of vagueness. Language and Communication, 22(3), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, D. (1986). Diffusion et vulgarisation: Itinéraires du texte scientifique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (2004). Focus, presuppositions, and discourse restrictions. Theoretical Linguistics, 30(1), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. (2007). Social epistemology: theory for the “Fourth wave” of knowledge transfer and exchange research. Science Communication, 29(1), 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, S. (1989). Rechtsextreme Propaganda heute. In Ehlich, K. (ed.), Sprache im Faschismus (pp. 289–322). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Jäger, S., and Link, J. (1993). Die vierte Gewalt. Rassismus und die Medien. (The Fourth Power. Racism and the Media). Duisburg: DISS.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1998). Images of savages: ancient roots of modern prejudice in Western culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jansen, S. C. (2002). Critical communication theory new media, science, technology, and gender. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jaspars, J. M. F., and Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In Farr, , and Moscovici, (eds.) (pp. 101–124).
Jaworski, A., Fitzgerald, R., and Morris, D. (2003). Certainty and speculation in news reporting of the future: the execution of Timothy McVeigh. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, J. (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, A., and Lee, J. M. (2008). The effects of active versus reflective learning style on the processes of critical discourse in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, H., and Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Construction of shared knowledge during collaborative learning. In Rogers Hall, Naomi Miyake & Noel Enyedy (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences.CrossRef
Jeong, H., and Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35(4), 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodelet, D. (ed.) (1989). Les représentations sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Jodelet, D. (2008). Social representations: the beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. C., and Griffith, D. C. (1996). Pollution, food safety, and the distribution of knowledge. Human Ecology, 24(1), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K. (2007). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, November, 760–771.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., and Raye, C. L. (2000). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. In Schacter, , and Scarry, (eds.) (pp. 35–86).
Johnson, S. (2012). Indigenous knowledge. Cambridge, UK: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., and Garnham, A. (1980). Descriptions and discourse models. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(3), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Oakhill, J., and Garnham, A. (eds.) (1996). Mental models in cognitive science. Essays in honour of Phil Johnson-Laird. Hove: Psychology Press.
Jones, B., and Miller, B. (2007). Innovation diffusion in the new economy: the tacit component. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joshi, S. T. (ed.) (2006). In her place: a documentary history of prejudice against women. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jost, J. T. (2009). “Elective affinities”: on the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., and Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. Special Issue: Stereotypes: Structure, function and process. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., and Major, B. (eds.) (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., and Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: representations, community and culture. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., Smith, S. W., and Ludge, T. (2003). Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics: semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction clan interfere with learning. Human Factors, 46(3), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., and Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45(4–5), 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamio, A. (1997). Territory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H., and Partee, B. H. (eds.) (2004). Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier.
Kamp, H., and Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: introduction to model-theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), online.Google Scholar
Kapoor, D., and Shizha, E. (eds.) (2010). Indigenous knowledge and learning in Asia/Pacific and Africa: perspectives on development, education, and culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karseth, B., and Nerland, M. (2007). Building professionalism in a knowledge society: examining discourses of knowledge in four professional associations. Journal of Education and Work, 20(4), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1974). Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaše, R., Paauwe, J., and Zupan, N. (2009). HR practices, interpersonal relations, and intrafirm knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: a social network perspective. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kausler, D. H., and Hakami, M. K. (1983). Memory for topics of conversation: adult age differences and intentionality. Experimental Aging Research, 9(3), 153–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keesing, R. M. (1979). Linguistic knowledge and cultural knowledge: some doubts and speculations. American Anthropologist, 81(1), 14–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, R. M. (1987). Models, “folk” and “cultural”: paradigms regained? In Holland, , and Quinn, (eds.) (pp. 369–393).CrossRef
Keesing, R. M. (1992). Custom and confrontation: the Kwaio struggle for cultural autonomy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keevallik, L. (2011). The terms of not knowing. In Stivers, , Mondada, and Steensig, (eds.) (2011b) (pp. 184–206).CrossRef
Kehler, A. (2004). Discourse topics, sentence topics, and coherence. Theoretical Linguistics, 30(2–3), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: an ontological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1998). Cognitive science and the origins of thought and knowledge. In Damon, W., and Lerner, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 1: Theorectical models of human development, 5th edn., (pp. 341–413). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Keller, R. (2005). Die diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Kellermann, K. (1987). Information exchange in social interaction. In Roloff, M. E., and Miller, G. R. (eds.), Interpersonal processes: new directions in communication research. Sage annual reviews of communication research, vol. 14 (pp. 188–219). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kellermann, K., and Palomares, N. A. (2004). Topical profiling: emergent, co-occurring, and relationally defining topics in talk. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(3), 308–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsh, D., Hill, D., and Macrine, S. L. (eds.) (2010). Class in education: knowledge, pedagogy, subjectivity. New York: Routledge.
Kempson, R. M. (1975). Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., and van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, M. L., and Smith, H. M. (1994). Reading and writing in the academic community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: the nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Keysar, B. (1997). Unconfounding common ground. Discourse Processes, 24(2–3), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., and Horton, S. W. (1998). Speaking with common ground: from principles to processes in pragmatics. A reply to Polichak and Gerrig. Cognition, 66, 191–198.Google ScholarPubMed
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., and Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Sciences, 11, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., and Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khine, M. S. E. (2008). Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: epistemological studies across diverse cultures. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, M. (2009). What happened? An epistemics of before and after in at-the-scene police questioning. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(1), 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, M., and Martinez, E. G. (2010). ‘Let me tell you about myself’: a method for suppressing subject talk in a ‘soft accusation’ interrogation. Discourse Studies, 12(1), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikoski, C. K., and Kikoski, J. F. (2004). The inquiring organization: tacit knowledge, conversation, and knowledge creation: skills for 21st-century organizations. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kim, S. I., and van Dusen, L. M. (1998). The role of prior knowledge and elaboration in text comprehension and memory: a comparison of self-generated elaboration and text-provided elaboration. The American Journal of Psychology, 111(3), 353–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, D. J. (1973). Influence of exposure interval and interitem interval on the learning of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97(2), 258–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. C. (2007). The nature and structure of content. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, N. A. (2000). Memory, narrative, identity: remembering the self. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from a text, levels of comprehension, or: why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W. (1994). The psychology of discourse processing. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 721–739). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., and Franzke, M. (1995). The role of background knowledge in the recall of a news story. In Lorch, , and O’Brien, (eds.) (pp. 321–333).
Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., and Landauer, T. K. (2007). LSA and meaning: in theory and application. In Landauer, T., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., and Kintsch, W. (eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 467–479). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. (1999). Relativism and reality: a contemporary introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirkham, R. L. (1992). Theories of truth: a critical introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirwen, M. C. (ed.) (2005). African cultural knowledge: themes and embedded beliefs. Nairobi: MIAS Books.
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G. (1990). La sémantique du prototype: catégories et sens lexical. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Kniffka, H. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 55(3–4), 243–276.Google Scholar
Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Hurford, J. R. (eds.) (2000). The evolutionary emergence of language: social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knotek, S., Sauer-Lee, A., and Lowe-Greenlee, B. (2009). Consultee-centered consultation as a vehicle for knowledge diffusion and utilization. In Rosenfield, S., and Berninger, V. (eds.), Implementing evidence-based academic interventions in school settings (pp. 233–252). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, A., Oberlander, J., O’Donnell, M., and Mellish, C. (2001). Beyond elaboration: the interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In Sanders, T., Schilperoord, J., and Spooren, W. (eds.), Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 181–196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, B. J. (1998). The relationship between remembering and knowing: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Acta Psychologica, 98(2–3), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, S. (2005). Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: a study of the development of the metaphor of genetic code. Public Understanding of Science, 14(4), 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, K. (2009). The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college experience on students’ comprehension of controversial texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, P. (2006). Representations of the world: memories, perceptions, beliefs, intentions and plans. Semiotica, 162(1/4), 73–125.Google Scholar
Kompus, K., Olsson, C. J., Larsson, A., and Nyberg, L. (2009). Dynamic switching between semantic and episodic memory systems. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2252–2260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komter, M. L. (1995). The distribution of knowledge in courtroom interaction. In Have, P. Ten, and Psathas, G. (eds), Situated order: studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 107–128). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Komter, M. L. (1998). Dilemmas in the courtroom: a study of trials of violent crime in the Netherlands. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kopperman, R. (1972). Model theory and its applications. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Koriat, A., and Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(3), 297–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornblith, H. (1993). Inductive inference and its natural ground: an essay in naturalistic epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. (ed.) (1994). Naturalizing epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and its place in nature. Oxford/Toronto: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2009). The effect of context on the use of metaphor in discourse. Iberica, 17, 11–23.Google Scholar
Koven, M. (2009). Managing relationships and identities through forms of address: what French–Portuguese bilinguals call their parents in each language. Language and Communication, 29(4), 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozminsky, E. (1977). Altering comprehension: the effect of biasing titles on text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 482–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, S. (ed.) (1990). Mass communication and political information processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krauss, R. M., and Fussell, S. R. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In Galegher, J., Kraut, R. E., and Egido, C. (eds.), Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 111–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. E., and Higgins, E. T. (1984). Communication and social cognition. In Wyer, , and Srull, (eds.) vol. 3.
Kroeber, A. L., and Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, vol. 47, no. 1.Google Scholar
Kronenfeld, D. B., Bennardo, G., de Munck, V. C., and Fischer, M. D. (eds.) (2011). A companion to cognitive anthropology. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D. (1996). Is good thinking scientific thinking? In Olson, D. R., and Torrance, N. (eds.), Modes of thought: explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 261–281). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: the anthropologists’ account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (2003). The return of the native. Current Anthropology, 44(3), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz-Costes, B., Rowley, S. J., Harris-Britt, A., and Woods, T. A. (2008). Gender stereotypes about mathematics and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 54, 386–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, D. (1988). Prolegomena to a speech act approach to hearsay evidence. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law/Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique, 1(3), 263–273.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English Vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, J. (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (1999). Testimonial knowledge and transmission (considerations on the epistemology of testimony and cognition). Philosophical Quarterly, 49(197), 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFollette, M. C. (2008). Science on the air: popularizers and personalities on radio and early television. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: the essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: why you can’t understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanser, S. S. (1981). The narrative act: point of view in prose fiction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larraín, J. (1979). The concept of ideology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, S. F. (1981). Knowledge updating: three papers on news memory, background knowledge, and text processing. Aarhus, Denmark: Institute of Psychology, University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., and Sears, D. O. (eds.) (1986). Political cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lauer, M., and Aswani, S. (2009). Indigenous ecological knowledge as situated practices: understanding fishers’ knowledge in the Western Solomon Islands. American Anthropologist, 111(3), 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, G. (2001). On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B. P. H. (2001). Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. W. (2007). Is there a place for private conversation in public dialogue? Comparing stakeholder assessments of informal communication in collaborative regional planning. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 41–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. (2009). News values, media coverage, and audience attention: an analysis of direct and mediated causal relationships. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. (1990). Theory of knowledge. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. (2000). Discursive knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(3), 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B., de Partz, M. P., Grandin, C., and Pillon, A. (2009). Domain-specific reorganization of semantic processing after extensive damage to the left temporal lobe. Neuroimage, 45(2), 572–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, D. (1960). Evidence and inference. Chicago, IL: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In Peters, S., and Saarinen, E., (eds.) Processes, beliefs and questions. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions. In Bloom, P., and Peterson, M. A. (eds.), Language and space (pp. 77–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., and Barnas, A. (2008). Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In Drew, P., and Wootton, A. (eds.), Erving Goffman: exploring the interaction order (pp. 161–227). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1974). Tristes tropiques. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., and Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. A. (2001). A sociological theory of communication: the self-organization of the knowledge-based society. New York: Universal Publishers.Google Scholar
Li, L., Cao, H. J., Wu, Z. Y., Wu, S., and Xiao, L. (2007). Diffusion of positive AIDS care messages among service providers in China. Aids Education and Prevention, 19(6), 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1987). On the origins of language: an introduction to the evolution of human speech. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, J. (ed.) (2012). Knowledge management handbook: collaboration and social networking. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRef
Lin, T. J., and Anderson, R. C. (2008). Reflections on collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenbaum, S., and Lock, M. M. (eds.) (1993). Knowledge, power, and practice: the anthropolgy of medicine and everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lindström, L. (1990). Knowledge and power in a South Pacific society. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Lipson, M. Y. (1982). Learning new information from text: the role of prior knowledge and reading ability. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(3), 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, R., and Smith, S. M. (eds.) (1988). Belief systems and international relations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lloyd, C. V. (1990). The elaboration of concepts in three biology textbooks: facilitating student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1019–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1690). An essay concerning humane understanding: In 4 books. London: Printed by E. Holt, for T. Basset.
Loewen, G. V. (2006). How can we explain the persistence of irrational beliefs? Essays in social anthropology. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Loftus, E. F. (1996). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. F., and Doyle, J. M. (1987). Eyewitness testimony: civil and criminal. New York: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. In Educational psychology review, 1, 209–234. NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., and O’Brien, E. J. E. (eds.) (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lounsbury, F. G. (1969). The structural analysis of kinship semantics. In Tyler, S. A. (ed.), Cognitive anthropology (pp. 193–212). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. M., and Graesser, A. C. (2006). Macrostructure. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M., and van Peer, W. (eds.) (2002). Thematics: interdisciplinary studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Lu, H. J., Su, Y. J., and Wang, Q. (2008). Talking about others facilitates theory of mind in Chinese preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1726–1736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and cognitive development: a reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, A. (1988). Literacy, textbooks, and ideology: postwar literacy instruction and the mythology of Dick and Jane. London/New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. (1996). Thought contagion: how belief spreads through society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (2 vols). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (2004). Talk that counts: age, gender, and social class differences in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (2005). Extremely common eloquence: constructing Scottish identity through narrative. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Machin, D., and Niblock, S. (2006). News production: theory and practice. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M., and Cooper, J. (1983). Attitude polarization: effects of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, M., and Coombs, S. L. (1981). More than news: media power in public affairs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Magnussen, S., Melinder, A., Stridbeck, U., and Raja, A. Q. (2010). Beliefs about factors affecting the reliability of eyewitness testimony: a comparison of judges, jurors and the general public. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and custom in savage society. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1939). The group and the individual in functional analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 948–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, science and religion: and other essays, with an introduction by Redfield, R.. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (2007). On the origins of the conceptual system. American Psychologist, 62(8), 741–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manfredi, P. A. (1993). Tacit beliefs and other doxastic attitudes. Philosophia, 22(1–2), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, I., and Maybury, M. T. (eds.) (1999). Advances in automatic text summarization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mann, W. C., and Thompson, S. A. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: a theory of text organization. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Mann, W. C., and Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: towards a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C., and Thompson, S. A. (1991). Discourse description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mannes, S., and St. George, M. (1996). Effects of prior knowledge on text comprehension: a simple modeling approach. In Britton, B. K. and Graesser, A. C. (eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 115–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London/New York: Kegan. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co./Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1972). Essays on the sociology of knowledge, edited by Paul Kecskemeti. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Manning, P. (2001). News and news sources: a critical introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Marchand, T. H. J. (ed.) (2010). Making knowledge: explorations of the indissoluble relation between mind, body and environment. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Marcu, D. (1999). Discourse trees are good indicators of importance in text. In Mani, , and Maybury, (pp. 123–135).
Marcu, D. (2000). The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., and Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: an experimental moment in the human sciences. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maria, K., and MacGinitie, W. (1987). Learning from texts that refute the reader’s prior knowledge. Reading Research and Instruction, 26(4), 222–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2006). Epistemic stance and commitment in the discourse of fact and opinion in English and Spanish: a comparable corpus study. In Hornero, A. M., Luzón, M. J., and Murillo, S. (eds.), Corpus linguistics: applications for the study of English (pp. 141–157). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2009). Effective vs. epistemic stance, and subjectivity/intersubjectivity in political discourse: a case study. In Tsangalidis, A., and Facchinetti, R (eds.), Studies on English Modality. In Honour of Frank R. Palmer (pp. 23–52). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2011a). Effective vs. epistemic stance, and subjectivity in political discourse: legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 193–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2011b). Epistemic legitimizing strategies, commitment and accountability in discourse. Discourse Studies, 13(6), 789–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markkanen, R., and Schröder, H. (eds.) (1997). Hedging and discourse: approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef
Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Markus, H., and Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemata on the perception of others. In Cantor, N., and Kihlstrom, J. (eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 233–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., and White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. M. W. (ed.) (1995). Sociocultural psychology theory and practice of doing and knowing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Martín Rojo, L., and Gómez Esteban, C. (2005). The gender of power: the female style of labour organizations. In Lazar, M. M. (ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: gender, power, and ideology in discourse (pp. 61–89). Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1846/1947). The German ideology. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Mason, R. A., and Just, M. A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text: a theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science, 15(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matilal, B. K., and Chakrabarti, A. (eds.) (1994). Knowing from words: Western and Indian philosophical analysis of understanding and testimony. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Mauss, M. (1972). A general theory of magic. New York: W. W. Norton (Norton Library).Google Scholar
Mawhinney, L. (2010). Let’s lunch and learn: professional knowledge sharing in teachers’ lounges and other congregational spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 972–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Using illustrations to promote constructivist learning from science text. In Otero, , León, , and Graesser, (eds.) (pp. 333–356).
Mayes, P. (2005). Linking micro and macro social structure through genre analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 331–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W. (1989). On the ethnography and the analysis of talk in institutional settings. In Holstein, J., and Miller, G. (eds.), New perspectives on social problems (pp. 127–164). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W., and Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: the interactional substrate of educational exams. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, A. (2008). Language and power: an introduction to institutional discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. (2006). Why defining is seldom “just semantics”: marriage and “marriage.” In Birner, B. J., and Ward, G. L. (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Lawrence R. Horn (pp. 217–240). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
McCready, E., and Ogata, N. (2007). Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(2), 147–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, M. T., and Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., Lehman, S., and Poliquin, A. (2007). The effect of causal diagrams on text learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., and Wall, L. C. (1983). Generalizing impact of object language to other audiences: peer response to office design. Psychological Reports, 53, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C. (2009). Imagination. In McLaughlin, B. P., Beckermann, A., and Walter, S. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind (pp. 595–606). Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1986). The vicissitudes of attitudes and similar representations in twentieth century psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 89–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1989). The structure of individual attitudes and attitude systems. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., and Greenwald, A. G. (eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 37–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McHoul, A. W. (ed.) (2001). How to analyse talk in institutional settings: a casebook of methods. New York: Continuum.
McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation: the organization of meaning in social interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high and low coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, D. S., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., and Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., and O’Reilly, T. (2002). Learning: knowledge acquisition, representation, and organization. In Guthrie, J. W. et al. (eds.), The encyclopedia of education. New York: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. (ed.) (1937). Cooperation and competition among primitive peoples. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRef
Mehan, H. (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 48(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhof, U. H., and Smith, J. (eds.) (2000). Intertextuality and the media: from genre to everyday life. Manchester University Press.
Menon, V., Boyett-Anderson, J. M., Schatzberg, A. F., and Reiss, A. L. (2002). Relating semantic and episodic memory systems. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(2), 261–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mény, Y., and Lavau, G. E. (1991). Idéologies, partis politiques et groupes sociaux. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.Google Scholar
Mercer, N. (ed.) (1987). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. London/New York: Methuen.
Merton, R. K. (eds.) (1983). The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
Mertz, E. (1992). Steps toward a social semiotic of selves (article review of the contributions to semiotics-self-and-society). Semiotica, 90(3–4), 295–309.Google Scholar
Metusalem, R., Kutas, M., Urbach, T. P., Hare, M., McRae, K., and Elman, J. L. (2012). Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 545–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mey, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M., and Schleef, E. (2010). The Routledge sociolinguistics reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyers, M. (1992). Reporters and beats: the making of oppositional news. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 9(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalove, P. A., Georg, S., and Ramer, A. M. (1998). Current issues in linguistic taxonomy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W. (1999). Local histories/global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, R., Crute, V., and Hargie, O. (1992). Professional interviewing. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, D. L., and Karakowsky, L. (2005). Gender influences as an impediment to knowledge sharing: when men and women fail to seek peer feedback. Journal of Psychology, 139(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, H. T., and Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration and Society, 32(6), 668–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, P. (ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., and Shah, P. (eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Moerman, M. (1987). Talking culture: ethnographic and conversational analysis. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2011). Management of knowledge discrepancies. In Stivers, , Mondada, , and Steensig, (eds.) (2011b) (pp. 27–57).
Monroe, J. (ed.) (2003). Local knowledges, local practices: writing in the disciplines at Cornell. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Montgomery, M. (2007). The discourse of broadcast news. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, H. L., and Sanders, T. (eds.) (2006). Anthropology in theory: issues in epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Morgan, M. (2004). Speech community. In Duranti, (ed.), (pp. 3–22).
Morris, B. (1991). Western conceptions of the individual. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Morrow, D. G. (1986). Places as referents in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(6), 676–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., and Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(3), 292–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, P. C., and McElroy, J. C. (1981). Interior office design and visitor response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 630–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychoanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. P. (ed.), Social cognition (pp. 181–209). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., Mucchi-Faina, A., and Maass, A. (eds.) (1994). Minority influence. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Munz, P. (1993). Philosophical Darwinism: on the origin of knowledge by means of natural selection. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, A. (1993). Common sense, science, and scepticism: a historical introduction to the theory of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mushin, I. (2001). Evidentiality and epistemological stance: narrative retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A., and Zinken, J. (eds.) (2008). Metaphor and discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1996). Strategic vagueness in academic writing. In Ventola, E., and Mauranen, A. (eds.), Academic writing: intercultural and textual issues (pp. 3–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, G. (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularization: questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naceur, A., and Schiefele, U. (2005). Motivation and learning – the role of interest in construction of representation of text and longterm retention: inter- and intraindividual analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, N. G. (1996). Learning through real-world problem solving: the power of integrative teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T. K., and Halualani, R. T. (eds.) (2010). The handbook of critical intercultural communication. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef
Nash, C., and Kirby, B. (1989). Whose news? Ownership and control of the news media (with simulation game). Manchester Development Education Project.Google Scholar
Natti, S., Halinen, A., and Hanttu, N. (2006). Customer knowledge transfer and key account management in professional service organizations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(3–4), 304–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Lavi, H., McKeachie, W. J., and Lin, Y. G. (1997). Individual-differences in students’ retention of knowledge and conceptual structures learned in university and high-school courses: the case of test anxiety. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 507–526.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazarea, V. D. (1999). Ethnoecology: situated knowledge/local lives. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Needham, R. (1972). Belief, language and experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: what are the important questions? In Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., and Sykes, R. N. (eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3–24). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (ed.) (1982). Memory observed: remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: Freeman.
Neisser, U. (ed.) (1993). The perceived self: ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Neisser, U. (ed.) (1997). The conceptual self in context culture, experience, self-understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Neisser, U., and Fivush, R. (eds.) (1994). The remembering self: construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Neisser, U., and Hyman, I. E. (2000). Memory observed: remembering in natural contexts. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Nevile, M. (2007). Action in time: ensuring timeliness for collaborative work in the airline cockpit. Language in Society, 36(2), 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newtson, D. A., and Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S., and Stich, S. P. (2003). Mindreading: an integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford/New York: Clarendon/Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, S., and Dirven, R. (eds.) (1997). The language of emotions: conceptualization, expression, and theoretical foundation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Nieuwland, M. S. (2013). “If a lion could speak…”: online sensitivity to propositional truth-value of unrealistic counterfactual sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., and Martin, A. E. (2012). If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: the role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension. Cognition, 122(1), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. A., and Scott, C. M. (eds.) (2010). Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: development and disorders. New York: Psychology Press.
Normand, R. (2008). School effectiveness or the horizon of the world as a laboratory. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(6), 665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1973). Theories of the proposition: ancient and medieval conceptions of the bearers of truth and falsity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. (1993). The semantics of certainty in Quechua and its implications for a cultural epistemology. Language in Society, 22(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2001a). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: a cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2001b). Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2012). Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction, 5(1), 53–76.Google Scholar
Nye, J. L., and Brower, A. M. (eds.) (1996). What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Nygren, A. (1999). Local knowledge in the environment–development: discourse from dichotomies to situated knowledges. Critique of Anthropology, 19(3), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., and McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J., and Garnham, A. (eds.) (1996). Mental models in cognitive science: essays in honour of Phil Johnson-Laird. Hove: Psychology Press.
Oberschall, A. (1993). Social movements: ideologies, interests, and identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ochs Keenan, E. (1976). The universality of conversational implicatures. Language in Society, 5, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1982). Talking to children in Western Samoa. Language in Society 11: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1987). The impact of stratification and socialization on men’s and women’s speech in Western Samoa. In Steele, S., and Philips, S. U. (eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 50–70). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., and Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., and Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B.B. (2001). Language acquisition and socialization. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader (pp. 263–301). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, H. (1992). Angewandte Fachtextlinguistik: “conclusions” und Zusammenfassungen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Operario, D., and Fiske, S. T. (1999). Integrating social identity and social cognition: a framework for bridging diverse perspectives. In Abrams, , and Hogg, (eds.), (pp. 26–54).
Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26, 126–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, T. M., Skowronski, J. J., and Nowak, A. (1994). The cognitive foundation of attitudes: it’s a wonderful construct. In Devine, P. G., Hamilton, D. L, and Ostrom, T. M. (eds.), Social cognition: impact on social psychology (pp. 195–258) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Otero, J., León, J. A., and Graesser, A. C. (eds.) (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., and McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paechter, C. F. (eds.) (2001). Knowledge, power, and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Paletz, D. L. (ed.) (1992). Terrorism and the media. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Palmer, C. T., and Wadley, R. L. (2007). Local environmental knowledge, talk, and skepticism: using ‘LES’ to distinguish ‘LEK’ from ‘LET’ in Newfoundland. Human Ecology, 35(6), 749–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panda, N., and Mohanty, A. K. (1981). Effects of adjunct questions on learning from connected discourse. Psychological Studies, 26(2), 117–123.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A. (2006). Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua, 116(10), 1688–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papousek, H., Papousek, M., and Koester, L. S. (1986). Sharing emotionality and sharing knowledge: a microanalytic approach to parent–infant communication. In Read, P. B., and Izard, Carroll E. (eds.), Measuring emotions in infants and children, vol. 2 (pp. 93–123). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, C. Y. (2001). News media exposure and self-perceived knowledge: the illusion of knowing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13(4), 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partee, B. H., and Sgall, P. (eds.) (1996). Discourse and meaning: Papers in Honor of Eva Hajičová. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Paulson, S. (2011). The use of ethnography and narrative interviews in a study of ‘cultures of dance.’ Journal of Health Psychology, 16(1), 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3(3), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelto, P. J., and Pelto, G. H. (1997). Studying knowledge, culture, and behavior in applied medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 11(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peräkylä, A., and Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society, 14(6), 727–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perry, D. K. (1990). News reading, knowledge about, and attitudes toward foreign-countries. Journalism Quarterly, 67(2), 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. (1993). The problem of the essential indexical and other essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petöfi, J. S., and Franck, D. M. L. (eds.) (1973). Presuppositions in linguistics and philosophy. Frankfurt: Athenaeum.
Petöfi, J. S., and Rieser, H. (eds.) (1973). Studies in text grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRef
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W.C. Brown.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, H. R., and Oehl, M. (2009). The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net-based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phye, G. D. (1997). Learning and remembering: the basis for personal knowledge construction. In Phye, G. D. (ed.), Handbook of academic learning: construction of knowledge (pp. 47–64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. (2001). Stereotyping: the politics of representation. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1993). Talk, thought, and thing: the emic road toward conscious knowledge. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pishwa, H. (ed.) (2006). Language and memory: aspects of knowledge representation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRef
Planalp, S., and Garvin-Doxas, K. (1994). Using mutual knowledge in conversation: friends as experts on each other. In Duck, S. (ed.), Dynamics of relationships (pp. 1–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Platchias, D. (2011). Phenomenal consciousness: understanding the relation between experience and neural processes in the brain. Durham, UK: Acumen.Google Scholar
Plett, H. F. (ed.) (1991). Intertextuality. Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter.
Plotkin, H. C. (1993). Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. C. (1997). Evolution in mind: an introduction to evolutionary psychology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. C. (2007). Necessary knowledge. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plungian, V. A. (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1981). Telling the same story twice. Text, 1(4), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M., and Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, C. (1987). Discussing for reasoning: the role of argument in knowledge construction. In de Corte, Erik, Lodewijks, Hans, and Parmentier, Roger (eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context, vol. 1 (pp. 71–82). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. E. (1992). Audience and rhetoric: an archaeological composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottier, J., Bicker, A., and Sillitoe, P. (eds.) (2003). Negotiating local knowledge: power and identity in development. London: Pluto Press.
Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pramling, N., and Saljö, R. (2007). Scientific knowledge, popularisation, and the use of metaphors: modern genetics in popular science magazines. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., and Greenwald, A. G. (eds.) (1989). Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Preyer, G., and Peter, G. (eds.) (2005). Contextualism in philosophy: knowledge, meaning, and truth. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Preyer, G., and Peter, G. (eds.) (2007). Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: new essays on semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Price, H. H. (1969). Belief. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Price, V., and Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: a theoretical account of media priming and framing. In Barnett, G., and Foster, F. J. (eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Priest, S. H. (ed.) (2010). Encyclopedia of science and technology communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Cole, P., (ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–256). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Propp, V. (1968). The morphology of the folktale, 2nd edn. (trans. Scott, T.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Prosser, H., and Walley, T. (2006). New drug prescribing by hospital doctors: the nature and meaning of knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 62(7), 1565–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkhardt, S. C. (1993). Transforming social representations: a social psychology of common sense and science. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Epistemology naturalized. In Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69–90). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, N. (1987). Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. In Holland, , and Quinn, (eds.), (pp. 173–192).CrossRef
Quinn, N. (ed.) (2005). Finding culture in talk: a collection of methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Quinn, N. (2011). The history of the Cultural Models school reconsidered: a paradigm shift in cognitive anthropology. In Kronenfeld, , Bennardo, , de Munck, , and Fischer, (eds.), (pp. 30–46).CrossRef
Quintana, S. M., and McKown, C. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of race, racism, and the developing child. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Rabon, D. (1992). Interviewing and interrogation. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Radin, P. (1927). Primitive man as philosopher. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Radnitzky, G., and Bartley, W. W. I. (eds.) (1987). Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.
Radvansky, G. A., and Zacks, J. M. (2011). Event perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 608–620.Google ScholarPubMed
Raftopoulos, A. (2009). Cognition and perception. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, G., and Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35, 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., and Sudzina, F. (2009). Personal knowledge management: the role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual and organisational levels. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1021–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, D. (2005). Beyond consciousness? The psychic landscape of social class. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 39(5), 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. J., and Beveridge, M. (1986). Effects of text illustration on children’s learning of a school science topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27, 53–94.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.) (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rescher, N. (ed.) (1990). Evolution, cognition, and realism: studies in evolutionary epistemology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (eds.) (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Reychav, I., and Te’eni, D. (2009). Knowledge exchange in the shrines of knowledge: the “how’s” and “where’s” of knowledge sharing processes. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1266–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. L. (2002). Testimony, knowledge, and epistemic goals. Philosophical Studies, 110(2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, M. (1990). Propositional attitudes: an essay on thoughts and how we ascribe them. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: an approach from critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickheit, G., and Habel, C. (eds.) (1999). Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
Rickheit, G., and Strohner, H. (eds.) (1985). Inferences in text processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Riley, S. C. E. (2003). The management of the traditional male-role: a discourse analysis of the constructions and functions of provision. Journal of Gender Studies, 12(2), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinck, M., and Bower, G. H. (2004). Goal-based accessibility of entities within situation models. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol. 44 (pp. 1–33). New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Ritzer, G. (1994). Sociological beginnings: on the origins of key ideas in sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. (2003). Beyond ground truth: GIS and the environmental knowledge of herders, professional foresters, and other traditional communities. Human Ecology, 31(2), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. P., and Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rodin, J., and Steinberg, S. P. (eds.) (2003). Public discourse in America: conversation and community in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolin, K. (2008). Science as collective knowledge. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (ed.) (1982). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold.
Romney, A. K., Batchelder, W. H., and Weller, S. C. (1986). Culture as consensus: a theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, D., Hearn, G., and Kastelle, T. (eds.) (2012). Handbook on the knowledge economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, M. (2008). Notions of focus anaphoricity. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Basic objects in natural categories. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Language Behavior Research Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, , and Lloyd, (eds.).
Rosch, E., and Lloyd, B. B. (eds.) (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 27–48).
Rosenberg, M. J., and Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In Hovland, C. I., and Rosenberg, M. J. (eds.), Attitude organization and change (pp. 1–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, M. (1981). Coups and earthquakes: reporting the world to America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Roskos, K., Boehlen, S., and Walker, B. J. (2000). Learning the art of instructional conversation: the influence of self-assessment on teachers’ instructional discourse in a reading clinic. The Elementary School Journal, 100(3), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, N., and Medin, D. L. (2011). Culture and cognition: the role of cognitive anthropology in anthropology and the cognitive sciences. In Kronenfeld, , Bennardo, , de Munck, , and Fischer, (eds.) (pp. 357–375).CrossRef
Roth, C., and Bourgine, P. (2005). Epistemic communities: description and hierarchic categorization. Mathematical population studies, 12(2), 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W. M. (2005). Talking science: language and learning in science classrooms. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rouchota, V., and Jucker, A. H. (eds.) (1998). Current issues in relevance theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Rouet, J. F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., and Spiro, R. J. (eds.) (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rubin, D. S. (ed.) (1986). Autobiographical memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Rubin, V. L. (2010). Epistemic modality: from uncertainty to certainty in the context of information seeking as interactions with texts. Information Processing and Management, 46(5), 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) (1996). States, social knowledge, and the origins of modern social policies. Princeton University Press Russell Sage Foundation.
Ruse, M. (1986). Taking Darwin seriously: a naturalistic approach to philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1971). Collected papers, vol. II: Collected essays, 1929–1968. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salili, F., Chiu, C., and Hong, Y. (eds.) (2001). Student motivation: the culture and context of learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Salmon, N. U., and Soames, S. (eds.) (1988). Propositions and attitudes. Oxford University Press.
Salomon, G. (ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press.
Salomon, G. (1997). Of mind and media: how culture’s symbolic forms affect learning and thinking. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 375–380.Google Scholar
Samuelstuen, M. S., and Bråten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, J., and Spooren, W. (1996). Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: a study of Dutch epistemic modifiers. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(3), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S., and Roberts, C. (eds.) (1999). Talk, work, and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRef
Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1997). Belief and knowledge: mapping the cognitive landscape. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Scarbrough, E. (1984). Political ideology and voting: an exploratory study. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarbrough, E. (1990). Attitudes, social representations, and ideology. In Fraser, , and Gaskell, (eds.), (pp. 99–117).
Scevak, J. J., and Moore, P. J. (1998). Levels of processing effects on learning from texts with maps. Educational Psychology, 18(2), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (ed.) (1999). The cognitive neuropsychology of false memories. Hove: Psychology Press.
Schacter, D. L., and Scarry, E. E. (2000). Memory, brain, and belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., and Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews – Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understandings: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: the real story. In Wyer, (ed.), vol. 8 (pp. 1–85).
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In Drew, , and Heritage, (eds.), (pp. 101–34).
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 715–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2003). On conversation analysis: an interview with Emanuel E. Schegloff with Svetla Cmejrková and Carlo L. Prevignano. In C. L. Prevignano, and P. J. Thibault (eds.), Discussing conversation analysis, the work of Emmanuel E. Schegloff. (pp. 11–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheler, M. (1980). Problems of a sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (2008). Speaking only your own mind: reflections on talk, gossip and intentionality in Bosavi (PNG). Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.) (2013). The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd edn. Malden, MA.: Blackwell.
Schlenker, P. (2008). Be articulate: a pragmatic theory of presupposition projection. Theoretical Linguistics, 34(3), 157–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, P., Murdock, G., and Elliott, P. (1983). Televising ‘terrorism’: political violence in popular culture. London: Comedia.Google Scholar
Schmid, A. P., and de Graaf, J. (1982). Violence as communication: insurgent terrorism and the Western news media. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmitt, F. F. (ed.) (1994). Socializing epistemology: the social dimensions of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Schnotz, W. (1993). Adaptive construction of mental representations in understanding expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. G., and Te’eni, D. (2011). Encyclopedia of knowledge management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
Schwarz, M. N. K., and Flammer, A. (1981). Text structure and title-effects on comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwoch, J., White, M., and Reilly, S. (1992). Media knowledge: readings in popular culture, pedagogy and critical citizenship. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1971). The philosophy of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1993). The problem of consciousness. Social Research, 60(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1998). Mind, language, and society: philosophy in the real world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2002). Consciousness and language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (1995). Approaches to summarization: discourse analysis and language education. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Semb, G. B., Ellis, J. A., and Araujo, J. (1993). Long-term-memory for knowledge learned in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R. (1989). Prototypes and social representations. In Jodelet, (ed.), (pp. 239–251).
Semin, G. R., and Smith, E. R. (2008). Embodied grounding: social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sert, O. (2013). ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., and Benešová, E. (1973). Topic, focus and generative semantics. Kronberg: Taunus.Google Scholar
Shanafelt, R. (2002). Idols of our tribes? Relativism, truth and falsity in ethnographic fieldwork and cross-cultural interaction. Critique of Anthropology, 22(1), 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. A. (2010). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2008). Vagueness in context. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, R. (1980). Knowledge, ideology and the politics of schooling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Shears, C., Hawkins, A., Varner, A., Lewis, L., Heatley, J., and Twachtmann, L. (2008). Knowledge-based inferences across the hemispheres: domain makes a difference. Neuropsychologia, 46(10), 2563–2568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelley, C., and Thagard, P. (1996). Mythology and analogy. In Olson, D. R., and Torrance, N. (eds.), Modes of thought: explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 152–183). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S. (2007). Right brain damage and the verbal expression of emotion: a preliminary investigation. Aphasiology, 21(3–4), 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1977). The ethnography of speaking: a critical appraisal. In Saville-Troike, M. (ed.), Linguistics and Anthropology (pp. 43–58). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1987). A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinjo, M., and Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of context in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, T., and Whitley, R. (eds.) (1985). Expository science: forms and functions of popularisation. Dordrecht/Boston, MA.: Reidel.CrossRef
Shipley, T. F., and Zacks, J. M. (eds.) (2008). Understanding events: from perception to action. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Short, K. (1992). Researching intertextuality within classroom learning environments. Linguistics and Education, 4(3–4), 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuy, R. W. (1998). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: an intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillitoe, P. (ed.) (2007). Local science vs. global science: approaches to indigenous knowledge in international development. New York: Berghahn Books.
Sillitoe, P. (2010). Trust in development: some implications of knowing in indigenous knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(1), 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, J. (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, M. (2007). Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality and presupposition. Lingua, 117, 1034–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2008). Almost certainly and most definitely: degree modifiers and epistemic stance. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), 1521–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. C., and Carpenter, M. (2008). Maternal talk about mental states and the emergence of joint visual attention. Infancy, 13(6), 640–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1990). The development from child speaker to native speaker. In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., and Herdt, G. (eds.), Cultural psychology: essays on comparative human development (pp. 233–256). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotte, V., Lonka, K., and Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2001). Study-strategy use in learning from text: does gender make any difference. Instructional Science, 29(3), 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., and Queller, S. (2004). Mental representations. In Brewer, M. B., and Hewstone, M. (eds.), Social cognition (pp. 5–27). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1982). Mutual knowledge. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Soames, S. (2010). What is meaning?Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, S. (2004). Discurso y género en historias de vida. Una investigación de relatos de hombres y mujeres en Bogotá. Bogota: Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Soley, L. C. (1992). The news shapers: the sources who explain the news. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sörlin, S., and Vessuri, H. M. C. (eds.) (2006). Knowledge society vs. knowledge economy: knowledge, power, and politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sosa, E. (ed.) (1994). Knowledge and justification. Aldershot, England/Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
Sosa, E., Kim, J., Fantl, J., and McGrath, M. (eds.) (2008). Epistemology: an anthology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., and Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99(4), 605–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, D. (1990). The epidemiology of beliefs. In Fraser, , and Gaskell, (eds.), (pp. 25–44).
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1990). Spontaneous deduction and mutual knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(1), 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Spires, H. A., and Donley, J. (1998). Prior knowledge activation: inducing engagement with informational texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spradley, J. P. (1972). Culture and cognition: rules, maps, and plans. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.Google Scholar
Squartini, M. (2008). Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics, 46(5), 917–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Glynn, S. M., and Carr, M. (1996). Beyond reading to learn: developing content and disciplinary knowledge through texts. In Baker, L., Afflerbach, P., and Reinking, D. (eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 136–146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In Munitz, M., and Unger, P. (eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197–214). New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1999). Context and content: essays on intentionality in speech and thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6), 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (2008). Our knowledge of the internal world. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, W. (1958). The sociology of knowledge: an essay in aid of a deeper understanding of the history of ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stehr, N., and Meja, V. (eds.) (2005). Society and knowledge: contemporary perspectives in the sociology of knowledge and science. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Stein, R. L., and Stein, P. L. (2005). The anthropology of religion, magic, and witchcraft. Boston: Pearson – Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Stemmer, B. (1999). Discourse studies in neurologically impaired populations: a quest for action. Brain and Language, 68(3), 402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., and Stephan, C. W. (1996). Intergroup relations. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
Stern, J. (2000). Metaphor in context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Steube, A. (ed.) (2004). Information structure: theoretical and empirical aspects. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef
Steup, M. (ed.) (2001). Knowledge, truth, and duty: essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Steup, M., and Sosa, E. (eds.) (2005). Contemporary debates in epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sticha, F. (1996). On implicitness in language and discourse: a contrastive view. In Hajičová, E., Leska, O., Sgall, P., and Skoumalova, Z. (eds.), Prague Linguistic Circle Papers, vol. 2 (pp. 331–346). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, M., and Steensig, J. (2011a). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Stivers, , Mondada, , and Steensig, (eds), (pp. 3–24).
Stivers, T., Mondada, M., and Steensig, J. (eds.) (2011b). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Stokoe, E., and Edwards, D. (2006). Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 56–65.Google Scholar
Strauss, C., and Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1950). Truth. Aristotelian Society, suppl, vol. 24, 139–156.Google Scholar
Strentz, H. (1989). News reporters and news sources: accomplices in shaping and misshaping the news. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W., Kruglanski, A., Bar-Tal, D., and Hewstone, M. (eds) (1988). The social psychology of intergroup conflict. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., and Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 513–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, W. C. (1964). Studies in ethnoscience. American Anthropologist, 66(2), 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stygall, G. (2001). A different class of witnesses: experts in the courtroom. Discourse Studies, 3(3), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderlin, W. D. (2002). Ideology, social theory, and the environment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., and Robertson, M. (2003). Linking knowledge, networking and innovation processes: a conceptual model. In Shavinina, L. V. (ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 680–694). New York: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1987). The definition of LIE. In Holland, and Quinn, (eds.) (pp. 43–66).CrossRef
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic stucture. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1985). Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 21(1), 293–337.Google Scholar
Tanesini, A. (1999). An introduction to feminist epistemologies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1994a). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1994b). Talking from 9 to 5: how women’s and men’s conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Tannen, D., Kendall, S., and Gordon, C. (eds.) (2007). Family talk: discourse and identity in four American families. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Taylor, E. L. (1989). Language and the study of shared cultural knowledge. In Helm, D. T., Anderson, W. T., Meehan, A. J., and Rawls, A. W. (eds.) The interactional order: new directions in the study of social order (pp. 215–230). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, J. T. (ed.) (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press.
Telfer, W. R., and Garde, M. J. (2006). Indigenous knowledge of rock kangaroo ecology in western Arnhem Land, Australia. Human Ecology, 34(3), 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide, 2nd edn. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrink, T., Coventry, K. R., and Andonova, E. (2011). Spatial strategies in the description of complex configurations. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In Pratkanis, , Breckler, , and Greenwald, (eds.), (pp. 129–151).
Teufel, S. (2010). The structure of scientific articles: applications to citation indexing and summarization. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, D. (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the internet. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 694–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., and Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L. (2011). Sociality in cognitive and sociocultural anthropologies: the relationships aren’t just additive. In Kronenfeld, , Bennardo, , de Munck, , and Fischer, (eds.), (pp. 413–429).CrossRef
Thomas, W. I. (1928/1966). Situational analysis: the behavior pattern and the situation. (1928). In Janovitz, M. (ed.), W. I. Thomas on social organization and social personality. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. P. (ed.) (1998a). Autobiographical memory: theoretical and applied perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thompson, C. P. (ed.) (1998b). Eyewitness memory: theoretical and applied perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thompson, J. B. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. L., Levine, J. M., and Messick, D. M. (eds.) (1999). Shared cognition in organizations: the management of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk: language ad interaction in institutional discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Knowledge acquisition from newspaper stories. Discourse Processes, 2(2), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. (2009). The transmission of knowledge in South African traditional healing. Africa, 79(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichenor, H. M. (1921). Primitive beliefs. Girard, KS: Haldeman-Julius.Google Scholar
Tillema, H., and Orland-Barak, L. (2006). Constructing knowledge in professional conversations: the role of beliefs on knowledge and knowing. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 592–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1998). The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., and Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomlin, R. S. (ed.) (1987). Coherence and grounding in discourse: outcome of a symposium, Eugene, Oregon, June 1984. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Tönnies, F. (1957). Community and society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., and Clarkson, J. J. (2008). Source trustworthiness and information processing in multiple message situations: a contextual analysis. Social Cognition, 26(3), 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T. (2005). Goal plans of action and inferences during comprehension of narratives. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., and van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.) (1990). Meanings and prototypes: studies in linguistic categorization. London/New York: Routledge.
Tsui, A. B. M. (1992). A functional description of questions. In Coulthard, M. (ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 89–110). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: a study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. T., and Donaldson, W. (eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., and Giles, H. (eds.) (1981). Intergroup behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.
Turow, J. (1984). Media industries: the production of news and entertainment. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., Hard, B. M. (2008). The structure of experience. In Shipley, , and Zacks, (eds.), (pp. 436–464).CrossRef
Unesco (1980). Many voices, one world. Report by the International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems (chaired by Sean Mac Bride). Paris: Unesco/London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Valencia, S. W., and Stallman, A. C. (1989). Multiple measures of prior knowledge: comparative predictive validity. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 38, 427–436.Google Scholar
Vallduvi, E. (1992). The informational component. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Van Ausdale, D., and Feagin, J. R. (2001). The first R: how children learn race and racism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Van Benthem, J. F. A. K. (2011). Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, R. G. (1984). Prolegomena to inferential discourse processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Deemter, K. (2010). Not exactly: in praise of vagueness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, P. W., Bauer, P. J., and Bourg, T. (eds.) (1997). Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: bridging fictional and actual events. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Van der Auwera, J. (1975). Semantic and pragmatic presupposition. Wilrijk: Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars: a study in theoretical linguistics and poetics. The Hague:Mouton.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: an interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1984a). Prejudice in discourse: an analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1984b). Structures of international news. Report to UNESCO. University of Amsterdam, Dept. of General Literary Studies, Section of Discourse Studies, Unpublished ms. (summarized in Van Dijk, 1988b).
Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis, 4 vols. London: Academic Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988a). News analysis: case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988b). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Race, riots and the press: an analysis of editorials in the British press about the 1985 disorders. Gazette, 43, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society, 3(1), 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Parliamentary debates. In Wodak, , and van Dijk, (eds.), (pp. 45–78).
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2004a). Discourse, knowledge and ideology. In Pütz, M., Neff, J., and van Dijk, T. A. (eds.), Communicating ideologies: multidisciplinary perspectives on language, discourse and social practice (pp. 5–38). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2004b). Knowledge and news. Revista Canaria e Estudios Ingleses 49, 71–86.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2004c). Text and context of parliamentary debates. In Bayley, P. (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse (pp. 339–372). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2005a). Contextual knowledge management in discourse production. A CDA perspective. In Wodak, R. and Chilton, P. (eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis (pp. 71–100) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2005b). War rhetoric of a little ally: political implicatures of Aznar’s legitimization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006a). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(3), 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (2006b). Discourse, interaction and cognition. Special issue of Discourse Studies 8(1), 5–7.
Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (2007). Discourse studies, 5 vols. Sage Benchmarks in Discourse Studies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008a). Discourse and context: a socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008b). Discourse and power. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009a). Society and discourse: how social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009b). Racism and discourse in Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2011a). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics. Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition (pp. 27–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (2011b). Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction, one-volume edition. London: Sage.CrossRef
Van Dijk, T. A. (2012). Knowledge, discourse and domination. In Meeuwis, M. and Östman, J.-O. (eds.), Pragmaticizing understanding: studies for Jef Verschueren (pp. 151–196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York/Toronto: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., and Porter, B. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of knowledge representation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Van Hout, T., and Jacobs, G. (2008). News production theory and practice: fieldwork notes on power, interaction and agency. Pragmatics, 18(1), 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kuppevelt, J. (1995). Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 109–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. J. (1995). Representing social action. Discourse and Society, 6(1), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. J. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C.Caldas-Coulthard, R., and Coulthard, M. (eds.), Texts and practices: readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. J. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Oostendorp, H. (1996). Updating situation models derived from newspaper articles. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 8(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
Van Oostendorp, H., and Goldman, S. R. (eds.) (1999). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Van Oostendorp, H., and Zwaan, R. A. (eds.) (1994). Naturalistic text comprehension. Advances in Discourse Processing, vol. LIII. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Van Voorst, J. (1988). Event structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPool, C. S., and VanPool, T. L. (2009). The semantics of local knowledge: using ethnosemantics to study folk taxonomies represented in the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Research, 65(4), 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Velmans, M., and Schneider, S. (eds.) (2007). The Blackwell companion to consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRef
Ventola, E. (2000). Discourse and community: doing functional linguistics. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Verdi, M. P., and Kulhavy, R. (2002). Learning with maps and texts: an overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veroff, J., Douvan, E., and Kulka, R. A. (1981). The inner American. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J., Östman, J. O., and Blommaert, J. (1994). Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vezin, L. (1980). Text organisation: supplied or constructed during learning, and acquired skills. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 7(3), 63–80.Google Scholar
Vine, B. (2004). Getting things done at work: the discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voithofer, R. (2006). Studying intertextuality, discourse and narratives to conceptualize and contextualize online learning environments. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(2), 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Cranach, M., Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (1992). Social representations and the social bases of knowledge. Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
Wade, S. E. (1992). How interest affects learning from text. In Renninger, , Hidi, , and Krapp, A. (eds.), (pp. 255–277).
Wade, S., and Schramm, W. (1969). The mass media as sources of public affairs, science and health knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 33, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waern, Y. (1977). On the relationship between knowledge of the world and comprehension of texts: assimilation and accommodation effects related to belief structure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., and Seifert, F. (2002). Collective symbolic coping with new technology: knowledge, images, and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wake, D. G. (2009). Teaching expository text structures: using digital storytelling techniques to make learning explicit. In Falk-Ross, F., Szabo, S., Sampson, M. B., and Foote, M. M. (eds.), Literacy issues during changing times: a call to action (pp. 164–188). Pittsburg, KS: College Reading Association.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. (2002). Legal argumentation and evidence. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. (2008). Witness testimony evidence: argumentation, artificial intelligence, and law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2001). Did you have fun: American and Chinese mother–child conversations about shared emotional experiences. Cognitive Development, 16(2), 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q. (2003). Emotion situation knowledge in American and Chinese preschool-children and adults. Cognition and Emotion, 17(5), 725–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegener, D. T., and Petty, R. E. (1998). The naive scientist revisited: naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, D. M., and Vallacher, R. R. (1981). Common-sense psychology. In Forgas, J. (ed.), Social cognition: perspectives on everyday understanding. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Welch, A. R., and Freebody, P. (eds.) (1993). Knowledge, culture, and power: international perspectives on literacy as policy and practice. London/Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Wellman, J. L. (2013). Organizational learning: how companies and institutions manage and apply knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werth, P. (1993). Accommodation and the myth of presupposition: the view from discourse. Lingua, 89(1), 39–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. (1984). Routine complications: troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. (2006). Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: a new framework for analysis. In Lassen, I., Strunck, J., and Vestergaard, T. (eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: ten critical studies (pp. 37–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilen, W. W. (ed.) (1990). Teaching and learning through discussion: the theory, research and practice of the discussion method. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Wilkinson, A., Papaioannou, D., Keen, C., and Booth, A. (2009). The role of the information specialist in supporting knowledge transfer: a public health information case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 118–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, N. (2009). Secrecy and the media: the official history of the United Kingdom’s D-notice system. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., and Cohen, G. (2008). Autobiographical memory. In Cohen, G., and Conway, M. A. (eds.), Memory in the real world, 3rd edn. (pp. 21–90). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P. (1991). Comprehension by learning-disabled and nondisabled adolescents of personal/social problems presented in text. The American Journal of Psychology, 104(4), 563–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, N. M., and Baines, G. (eds.) (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge: wisdom for sustainable development. Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University.
Williams, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. C., Gutiérrez, F., and Chao, L. M. (2003). Racism, sexism, and the media: the rise of class communication in multicultural America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Winiecki, D. (2008). The expert witnesses and courtroom discourse: applying micro and macro forms of discourse analysis to study process and the ‘doings of doings’ for individuals and for society. Discourse and Society, 19(6), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, U. (2002). Performanz. Zwischen Sprachphilosophie und Kulturwissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (1984). Determination of guilt: discourses in the courtroom. In Kramarae, C., Schulz, M., and O’Barr, W. M. (eds.), Language and power (pp. 89–100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (1989a). Sprache und Macht – Sprache und Politik. Vienna: Österreichischer Bundesverlag.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (ed.) (1989b). Language, power, and ideology: studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Wodak, R., and van Dijk, T. A. (eds.) (2000). Racism at the top: parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.
Wodak, R., Johnstone, B., and Kerswill, P. (eds.) (2011). The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics. London: Sage.
Wodak, R., Khosravinik, M., and Mral, B. (eds.) (2013). Right-wing populism in Europe. London: Bloomsbury.
Wolfe, M. B. W., and Mienko, J. A. (2007). Learning and memory of factual content from narrative and expository text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 541–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, M. (2008). The man who owns the news: inside the secret world of Rupert Murdoch. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Wosnitza, M., and Volet, S. (2009). A framework for personal goals in collaborative learning contexts. In Wosnitza, M., Karabenick, S. A., Efklides, A., and Nenniger, P. (eds.), Contemporary motivation research: from global to local perspectives (pp. 49–67). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
Wright, A. L., Bauer, M., Clark, C., Morgan, F., and Begishe, K. (1993). Cultural interpretations and intracultural variability in Navajo beliefs about breast-feeding. American Ethnologist, 20(4), 781–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (1993). Realism, meaning, and truth. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wuketits, F. M. (1990). Evolutionary epistemology and its implications for humankind. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, R. (1989). Communities of discourse: ideology and social structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European socialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S. (ed.) (1995). Knowledge and memory: the real story. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wyer, R. S. (ed.) (1996). Ruminative thoughts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wyer, R. S. (2004). The cognitive organization and use of general knowledge. In Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., and Prentice, D. A. (eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: the yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 97–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, R. S., and Srull, T. K. (eds.) (1984). Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Yaros, R. A. (2006). Is it the medium or the message? Structuring complex news to enhance engagement and situational understanding by nonexperts. Communication Research, 33(4), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yearley, S. (1992). Green ambivalence about science: legal-rational authority and the scientific legitimation of a social movement. British Journal of Sociology, 43(4), 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, S. A. (2008). An evolutionary approach to harnessing complex systems thinking in the science and technology classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. F. D. (ed.) (1971). Knowledge and control: new directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.
Zacks, J. M., and Sargent, J. Q. (2009). Event perception: a theory and its application to clinical neuroscience. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 53 (pp. 253–299). Burlington: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zacks, J. M., and Swallow, K. M. (2007). Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 80–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., and Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind: an inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammuner, V. L. (1981). Speech production: strategies in discourse planning: a theoretical and empirical enquiry. Hamburg: H. Buske.Google Scholar
Zanna, M. P., and Olson, J. M. (eds.) (1994). The psychology of prejudice: the Ontario Symposium, vol. 7. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zappavigna, M. (2013). Tacit knowledge and spoken discourse. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Zelezny, J. D. (1993). Cases in communications law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. M. (1991). Reliable knowledge: an exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M. (2008). Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1142–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., and Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, R. A., and Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Teun A. van Dijk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
  • Book: Discourse and Knowledge
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Teun A. van Dijk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
  • Book: Discourse and Knowledge
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Teun A. van Dijk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
  • Book: Discourse and Knowledge
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404.009
Available formats
×