Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-qvshk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T00:24:05.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Cardan suspension of science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Douwe Draaisma
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

In 1875, Jean-Martin Charcot celebrated his fiftieth birthday. He had spent the previous ten years at La Salpêtrière, where he focused his attention on diseases of the elderly and disorders of the nervous system. Charcot’s reputation was already established. He was the first to distinguish between multiple sclerosis (his coinage) and Parkinson’s disease; he identified amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, characterized by a rapid atrophy of muscle tissue, also known as Charcot’s disease); and described Charcot’s foot, a sudden softening of the bones of the foot as a result of nerve damage. Of the dozens of eponyms which include Charcot’s name, the majority refer to his work in neurology. He had been a member of the Académie de Médecine since 1872, but the prestigious membership of the Académie des Sciences lay years into the future. Much of what would determine how Charcot is remembered (his research into hysteria, the semi-public Leçons du Mardi, the theatrical hypnosis demonstrations) dates from the second half of the 1880s. In 1875, Charcot was first and foremost a neuroanatomist.

Like many physicians of his generation, Charcot was an excellent draughtsman, and many of his sketches have been preserved. He always encouraged his students to develop their drawing skills. He believed that drawing had a formative influence: it taught you to observe and to be attentive to details. A number of his doctoral students illustrated their own dissertations. And Charcot himself was often portrayed. In 1875, Brissaud, then still a student, secretly sketched the professor during an anatomy lecture. One of the senior physicians caught him at it, confiscated the drawing, and showed it to Charcot. Brissaud must have held his breath. The portrayal is of an overwhelming simplicity. Charcot is holding a brain in his hands and pointing out to his students something which is apparently on the underside. If he had not been wearing a high hat, he could easily have been mistaken for a butcher showing a customer his wares, before wiping his hands on his apron. Charcot had the drawing framed. Perhaps the one draughtsman had seen what the other was trying to express: concentration, hard work, an organ that only gives up its secrets to someone who is not afraid to dirty his hands.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goetz, C. G., Bonduelle, M. and Gelfand, T., Charcot: Constructing Neurology (New York, 1995Google Scholar
Meige, H., ‘Charcot artiste’, Nouvelle iconographie de la Salpêtrière, 11 (1898), 489–516.Google Scholar
Wing, L., ‘Reflections on opening Pandora’s Box’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35 (2005) 2, 197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ssucharewa, G. E., ‘Die schizoiden Psychopathien im Kindesalter’, Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 60 (1926), 235–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, S. M., ‘Stigler’s law of eponymy’ in Gieryn, T. F. (ed.), Science and Social Structure: a Festschrift for Robert K. Merton (New York, 1980), pp. 147–57Google Scholar
Wolff, S., Loners: the Life Path of Unusual Children (London, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, S., ‘The first account of the syndrome Asperger described?’, European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 5 (1996), 119–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulenberg, F. and Oderwald, A., ‘Wat wil het geval. . .? Gevalsbeschrijvingen in medische wetenschap en journalistiek’ in Meijman, F. J. and Meulenberg, F. (eds.), Medische publiekscommunicatie. Een panorama (Houten, 2002), pp. 288–316Google Scholar
Luria, A. R., The Man with a Shattered World (Cambridge, 1987Google Scholar
Harrington, A., Medicine, Mind, and the Double Brain: a Study in Nineteenth-Century Thought (Princeton NJ, 1987), p. 92Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., The Mismeasure of Man (New York, 1981), p. 85Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W., ‘Cerebral organization and behavior’, Science, 133 (1961), 1747–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Springer, S. P. and Deutsch, G., Left Brain, Right Brain (New York, 1993Google Scholar
Henschen, S. E., ‘On the function of the right hemisphere of the brain in relation to the left in speech, music and calculation’, Brain, 49 (1926), 110–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M. C., ‘Are we in our right minds?’ in Della Sala, S. (ed.), Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions about the Mind and Brain (Chichester, 1999), pp. 25–41Google Scholar
Bogen, J., ‘The other side of the brain I: dysgraphia and dyscopia following cerebral commissurotomy’, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies, 34 (1969) 2, 73–105.Google Scholar
Bogen, J. E., De Zure, R., Tenhouten, W. D. and Marsh, J. F., ‘The other side of the brain IV: the A/P ratio’, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies, 37 (1972) 2, 49–61Google ScholarPubMed
Zook, J. A. and Dwyer, J. H., ‘Cultural differences in hemisphericity: a critique’, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies, 41 (1976) 3, 87–90Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, L., Ten Houten, W., Kaplan, C. D. and Gardiner, M., ‘Hemispheric specialization of language: an EEG study of bilingual Hopi Indian children’, International Journal of Neuroscience, 8 (1977), 1–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrisjohn, R. E. and Peters, M., ‘The right-brained Indian: fact or fiction?’, Journal of American Indian Education, 13 (1986), 62–71Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P. and Davison Ankney, C., ‘Brain size and cognitive ability: correlations with age, sex, social class, and race’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3 (1996), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, L., ‘How “caucasoids” got such big crania and why they shrank’, Current Anthropology, 42 (2001), 69–96Google ScholarPubMed
Marks, J., Human Biodiversity (New York, 1995), p. 271Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×