Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T09:09:56.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Developmental Abnormalities of the Reproductive System and Their Relevance to Obstetric Practice

from Section 1 - Basic Sciences in Obstetrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2021

By
Parivakkam S. Arunakumari ,
Vennila Palaniappan  and
Richard Haines
Edited by
Tahir Mahmood ,
Charles Savona Ventura ,
Ioannis Messinis  and
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Congenital malformations of the female genital tract are defined as deviations from normal anatomy resulting from embryological maldevelopment of the Mullerian (paramesonephric) ducts [1].

Type
Chapter
Information
The EBCOG Postgraduate Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Obstetrics & Maternal-Fetal Medicine
 , pp. 19 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grimbizis, GF, Gordts, S, Di Spiezio Sardo, A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–44.Google Scholar
Grimbizis, GF, Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Saravelos, SH, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(1):2–7.Google Scholar
Chan, YY, Jayaprakasan, K, Zamora, J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761–71.Google Scholar
Kliegman, R, Stanton, B, St. Geme, J, Schor, NF, Nelson, WE. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 20th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.Google Scholar
Creighton, S, Balen, A, Breech, L. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology: A Problem-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttram, VC Jr., Gibbons, WE. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril. 1979;32(1):40–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944–55.Google Scholar
Oppelt, P, Renner, SP, Brucker, S, et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1493–7.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, BR, Goldstein, SR, Groszmann, YS. T-shaped uterus. In Gynecologic Ultrasound: A Problem-Based Approach. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2014. pp. 189–91.Google Scholar
Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Florio, P, Nazzaro, G, et al. Hysteroscopic outpatient metroplasty to expand dysmorphic uteri (HOME-DU technique): a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(2):166–74.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, S, Butts, S, Dumesic, D, et al. Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):530–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surrey, ES, Katz-Jaffe, M, Surrey, RL, et al. Arcuate uterus: is there an impact on in vitro fertilization outcomes after euploid embryo transfer? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):638–43.Google Scholar
Donnez, J. Arcuate uterus: a legitimate pathological entity? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomaževič, T, Ban-Frangež, H, Virant-Klun, I, et al. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(5):700–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, YY, Jayaprakasan, K, Tan, A, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(4):371–82.Google Scholar
Tomaževič, T, Ban-Frangež, H, Ribič-Pucelj, M, Premru-Sršen, T, Verdenik, I. Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(2):154–7.Google Scholar
Khalifa, E, Toner, JP, Jones, HW Jr. The role of abdominal metroplasty in the era of operative hysteroscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;176(3):208–12.Google Scholar
Pabuçcu, R, Gomel, V. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with septate uterus and otherwise unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1675–8.Google Scholar
Homer, HA, Li, TC, Cooke, ID, Bontis, JN, Devroey, P. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73:1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimbizis, GF, Camus, M, Tarlatzis, BC, Bontis, JN, Devroey, P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(2):161–74.Google Scholar
Deutch, TD, Bocca, S, Oehninger, S, Stadtmauer, L, Abuhamad, AZ. P-465: Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of Mullerian anomalies. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(3):S308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venetis, CA, Papadopoulos, SP, Campo, R, et al. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schorge, JO, Williams, JW. Williams Gynecology. New York; London: McGraw-Hill Medical; McGraw-Hill [distributor]; 2008.Google Scholar
Rock, JA, Thompson, JD, Linde, RWt. Te Linde’s Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Number 274, July 2002. Committee on Adolescent Health Care. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):167–70.Google Scholar
Brannstrom, M. Uterus transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20(6):621–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emans, SJH, Laufer, MR. Emans, Laufer, Goldstein’s Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×