Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Case A - Framing Climate Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2019
Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
The case study on framing in the climate change debate demonstrates how profound variations in the understanding of climate change underlie some of the current disagreements. Various framing processes are at work in this example, including scale frames or metaphors. Mike Hulme shows how analysing these frames can clarify assumptions, as well as help to map what disagreement is about, such as by pointing to very different root causes of climate change. He shows how frames operate even in climate science and the world of climate models.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental ExpertiseConnecting Science, Policy and Society, pp. 58 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Agarwal, A., and Narain, S. (1991). Global Warming in an Unequal World. Delhi: Centre for Science and the Environment.Google Scholar
Ford, J. D., Vanderbilt, W., and Berrang-Ford, L. (2012). Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its Implications for Content: Climate Change and Indigenous Populations in WGII. Climatic Change, 113(2), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewitt, C., Mason, S., and Walland, D. (2012). The Global Framework for Climate Services. Nature Climate Change, 2(12), 831–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymann, M. (2010). The Evolution of Climate Ideas and Knowledge. WIREs Climate Change, 1(4), 581–597.Google Scholar
Hulme, M., O’Neill, S. J., and Dessai, S. (2011). Is Weather Event Attribution Necessary for Adaptation Funding? Science 334, 764–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. A Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/pdf/WGIII_TAR_full_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2010). A New Climate for Society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2/3), 233–253.Google Scholar
Keenleyside, N. S., and Ba, J. (2010). Prospects for Decadal Climate Prediction. WIREs Climate Change, 1(5), 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Lieshout, M. van, Dewulf, A., Aarts, N., and Termeer, C. (2011). Do Scale Frames Matter? Scale Frame Mismatches in the Decision Making Process of a ‘Mega Farm’ in a Small Dutch Village. Ecology and Society, 16(1), art. 38: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art38/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. A. (2004). Climate Science and the Making of a Global Political Order. In Jasanoff, S., ed., States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Global Order (46–67). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
NASA (1986). Earth System Science: A Program For Global Change. NASA Earth System Science Committee.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. O., and Reenberg, A. (2012). Exploring Causal Relations: The Societal Effects of Climate Change. Danish Journal of Geography, 112(2), 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudiak-Gould, P. (2012). Promiscuous Corroboration and Climate Change Translation: A Case Study from the Marshall Islands. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 46–54.Google Scholar
Russill, C. (2015). Climate Change Tipping Points: Origins, Precursors, and Debates. WIREs Climate Change, 6(4), 427–34.Google Scholar
Simms, A. (2012). Cancel the Apocalypse: The New Path to Prosperity. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Stern Review (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stocker, T. F., and Plattner, G. K (2014). Rethink IPCC Reports. Nature, 513, 163–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., and Hulme, M. (2016). What Does Policy-Relevant Global Environmental Knowledge Do? The Cases of Climate and Biodiversity. Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 65–72.Google Scholar
Vaughan, C., and Dessai, S. (2014). Climate Services for Society: Origins, Institutional Arrangements, and Design Elements for an Evaluation Framework. WIREs Climate Change, 5(5), 587–603.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. P., Lempert, R. J., Brown, C., Hall, J. A., Revell, D., and Sarewitz, D. (2013). Improving the Contribution of Climate Model Information to Decision-Making: The Value and Demands of Robust Decision Frameworks. WIREs Climate Change, 4(1), 39–60.Google Scholar