Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:02:11.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2021

René van Woudenberg
René van Woudenberg
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation , pp. 234 - 242
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert. 1972. “Must God Create the Best?” Philosophical Review 81:317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfano, Mark. 2009. “Sensitivity Theory and the Individuation of Belief-Formation Methods.” Erkenntnis 70:271–281.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 1964. Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 1991. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 1993. The Reliability of Sense Perception. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 1996. A Realist Conception of Truth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 2005. Beyond “Justification”: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1984. Understanding and Explanation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David M. 1989. Universals: An Opiniated Introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1993. Action, Intention, and Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1994. “Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions to Believe.” Nous 28:419–434.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1998. Epistemology. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1999. “Moral Knowledge and Ethical Pluralism.” In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, edited by Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest, 271–302. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2002. “The Sources of Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, edited by Moser, Paul K., 71–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2010. Epistemology. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2013. Moral Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1970. Philosophical Papers. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Baker-Hytch, Max. 2018. “Complexity-Based Beliefs and the Generality Problem for Reliabilism.” Quaestiones Disputatae 8:19–35.Google Scholar
Bealer, George. 1999. “The Apriori.” In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, edited by Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest, 243–270. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. 1980. Critical Practice. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul. 1973. “Mathematical Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 70:661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelson, Paul, and de Gelder, Beatrice. 2004. “The Psychology of Multimodal Perception.” In Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention, edited by Spence, Charles and Driver, Jon, 151–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bertens, Hans. 2014. Literary Theory: The Basics. 3rd ed. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
“Bijentelling enkele dagen verlengd” [Bee count extended by a few days]. 2019. Trouw, p. 8, 15 April.Google Scholar
Bleicher, Joseph. 1980. Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1935. Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bod, Rens. 2015. A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Patterns and Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BonJour, Laurence. 2002. Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bos, Abraham P. 2003. The Soul and Its Instrumental Body: A Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Living Nature. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bouter, Lex, and Hendrix, Sven. 2017. “Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection.” Accountability in Research 24:359–366.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 1999. Faces of Intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1969. Religion, Philosophy, and Psychical Research. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, Bill. 2008. Shakespeare: The World as a Stage. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Byers, William. 2007. How Mathematicians Think: Using Ambiguity, Contradiction, and Paradox to Create Mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman, and Hawthorne, John. 2009. Relativism and Monadic Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Adam, and Poston, Ted. 2018. A Critical Introduction to Knowledge-How. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Carter, Craig A. 2018. Interpreting Scripture with the Great Tradition: Recovering the Genius of Premodern Exegesis. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Cassam, Quassim. 2009. “What Is Knowledge?” In Epistemology, edited by O’Hear, Anthony, 101–120. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1957. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1977. Theory of Knowledge. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chladenius, Johann Martin. 1742. Einleitung zur richtigen Auslegung vernünfftiger Reden und Schriften. Leipzig: Lanckisch.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58:7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Conee, Earl. 1994. “Phenomenal Knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72:136–150.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Terence. 2007. The Normative Web. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Terence, and Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2014. “The Moral Fixed Points: New Directions for Moral Nonnaturalism.” Philosophical Studies 171:399–443.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 2004. Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas. 2009. Reading in the Brain. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1990. “The Interpretation of Texts, People, and Other Artifacts.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1927. Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 7, Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Leipzig/Berlin: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Domaradzki, Mikolaj. 2017. “The Beginnings of Greek Allegoresis.” Classical World 110:299–321.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Sue, and Kymlicka, Will. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dooley, Lucile. 1920. “Psychoanalysis of Charlotte Brontë, as a Type of the Woman of Genius.” The American Journal of Psychology 31:221–272.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1969. Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 2000. “Simple Seeing.” In Perception, Knowledge, and Belief: Selected Essays, by Dretske, Fred, 97–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2012. Formal Languages in Logic: A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elgin, Catherine. 1996. Considered Judgment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 1953. Ethics. London: English University Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 1962. The Fundamental Questions of Philosophy. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Fales, Evan. 1996. A Defense of the Given. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard. 2003. Epistemology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Steven Roger. 2004. A History of Writing. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard. 2018. The Geography of Insight: The Humanities, the Sciences, How They Differ, Why They Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
French, Craig. 2012. “Does Propositional Seeing Entail Propositional Knowing?” Theoria 78:115–127.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. (1915) 1979. Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth. 1995. “Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Mind 104:393–411.Google Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth. 2003. “Understanding and Knowledge of What Is Said.” In Epistemology of Language, edited by Barber, Alex, 325–366. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard. 2001. “Classical Foundationalism.” In Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism, edited by DePaul, Michael R., 3–20. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Wahrheit und Methode. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated by Linge, David E.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gaskin, Richard. 2013. Language, Truth, and Literature: A Defence of Literary Humanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfert, Axel. 2014. A Critical Introduction to Testimony. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó, and Hawthorne, John, eds. 2006. Perceptual Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, John. 2007. Fiction and the Weave of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, John. 2009. “Literature and Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature, edited by Eldridge, Richard, 467–485. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, Thomas. 1991. How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ginet, Carl. 1975. Knowledge, Perception, and Memory. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Girard, René. 1965. Mensonge romantique et vérité romanesque. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Girard, René. 1976. Deceit, Desire, and the Novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2010. The Event Structure of Perception Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 1979. “What Is Justified Belief?” In Justification and Knowledge, edited by Pappas, George S., 1–23. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Oliver. 1973. Treasury of Aesop’s Fables. Illustrated by Bewick, Thomas. New York: Avenel Books.Google Scholar
Goodman, Jeffrey. 2020. “On Reading.” Acta Analytica 35:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00400-5.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1976. “Belief, Values, and the Will.” Dialogue 15:642–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Gordon. 2005. Philosophy of the Arts. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. 2006. “Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57:515–535.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. 2016. “How Understanding People Differs from Understanding the Natural World.” Philosophical Issues 26:209–225.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. 2018. “Understanding as an Intellectual Virtue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Virtue Epistemology, edited by Battaly, Heather, 340–351. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. 2020. “Transmitting Understanding and Know-How.” In What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology, edited by Heatherington, Stephen and Smith, Nicholas D., 124–139. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. 1970. The Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2007. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ali, and Fumerton, Richard. 2017. “Knowledge by Acquaintance vs. Description.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/knowledge-acquaindescrip/.Google Scholar
Hemeren, Goran. 1983. “Interpretation: Types and Criteria.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 19:131–161.Google Scholar
Jack, Belinda. 2019. Reading: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1986. “What Mary Didn’t Know.” The Journal of Philosophy 83:291–295.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. E. 1964. Logic, Part 1. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2006. “Better Than Mere Knowledge? The Function of Sensory Awareness.” In Perceptual Experience, edited by Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John, 260–290. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Keen, Susan. 2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary, ed. 2001. Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krämer, Sybille. 2003. “Writing, Notational Iconicity, Calculus: On Writing as a Cultural Technique.” Modern Languages Notes 118:518–537.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James. 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter. 2000. “Objects of Interpretation.” Metaphilosophy 31:96–124.Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter, and Olsen, Stein. 1994. Truth, Fiction, and Literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1996. “Elusive Knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74:549–567.Google Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1689) 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Loux, Michael J., and Crisp, Thomas. 2017. Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. 1978. A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Machuca, Diego E., and Reed, Baron, eds. 2018. Skepticism from Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. 2016. “Hermeneutics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/hermeneutics/.Google Scholar
McNaughton, David. 1999. Moral Vision. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Menary, Richard. 2007. “Writing as Thinking.” Language Sciences 29:621–632.Google Scholar
Millett, Kate. 1970. Sexual Politics. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1993. “Moore’s Paradox.” In Selected Writings, edited by Baldwin, Thomas, 207–212. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul K. 1989. Knowledge and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul K., Mulder, Dwayne, and Trout, J. D.. 1998. The Theory of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1954. The Portable Nietzsche. Edited by Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Lilian. 2015. Philosophy of Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, Casey. 2012. “Perception and Multimodality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Margolis, Eric, Samuels, Richard, and Stich, Stephen, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 1983. Sense and Content: Experience, Thought, and Their Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peels, Rik. 2020. “How Literature Delivers Knowledge and Understanding, Illustrated by Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles and Wharton’s Summer.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 60:199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993a. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993b. Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1960. “The Sources of Knowledge and Ignorance.” Proceedings of the British Academy 46:39–71.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1972. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Postma, Marten. 2019. “The Meaning of Word Sense Disambiguation Research.” PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. 2005. Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. 2006. What Is This Thing Called Knowledge? London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. 2012. Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1987. The Many Faces of Realism. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1961. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View, by Quine, Willard V. O., 20–46. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ranalli, Chris. 2014. “Luck, Propositional Perception, and the Entailment Thesis.” Synthese 191:1222–1247.Google Scholar
Ranalli, Chris. 2019. “The Puzzle of Philosophical Testimony.” European Journal of Philosophy 28:1–22.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. (1764) 1997. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Edited by Brookes, Derek. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. (1785) 2002. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edited by Brookes, Derek. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. (1788) 1969. Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Edited by Brody, Baruch. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1973. “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation.” Philosophy Today 17:129–141.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1981. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex. 2011. The Atheist’s Guide to Reality. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. (1865) 2002. Sesame and Lilies. Edited by Nord, Deborah Epstein. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1948. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Schacht, Richard. 1984. “Nietzsche on Philosophy, Interpretation and Truth.” Noûs 18:75–85.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz. 1927. “Vom Sinn des Lebens.” Symposion 1:331–354.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2008. “The Unreliability of Naïve Introspection.” Philosophical Review 117:245–273.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shope, Robert. 1983. The Analysis of Knowledge: A Decade of Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shope, Robert. 2002. “Conditions and Analyses of Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, edited by Moser, Paul K., 25–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Simon. 1997. Fermat’s Last Theorem. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8:3–53.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stampe, Dennis W. 1968. “Toward a Grammar of Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 77:137–174.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, Jerome. 1992. “On the Cognitive Triviality of Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 32:191–200.Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey. 1982. “What Is the Meaning of a Text?” New Literary History 14:1–12.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonor. 2001. “Augustine on Free Will.” In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, edited by Stump, Eleonore and Kretzmann, Norman, 124–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 1991. The Existence of God. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. 1691. Einleitung zu der Vernunfft-Lehre. Halle: Salfeld.Google Scholar
Tomalin, Claire. 2006. Thomas Hardy: The Time-Torn Man. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Turner, Steve. 1982. Up to Date. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Turri, John. 2010. “Does Perceiving Entail Knowing?” Theoria 76:197–206.Google Scholar
Twardowski, Kazimierz. 1999. “On the Logic of Adjectives.” In On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy, by Kazimierz Twardowski, 141–143. Edited by Brandle, Johannes and Wolenski, Jan. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen. 1972. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Unger, Peter. 2000. “An Argument for Skepticism.” In Epistemology: An Anthology, edited by Sosa, Ernest and Kim, Jaegwon, 42–52. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, James. 1999. Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James. 2015. Problems from Reid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Brink, Gijsbert, de Ridder, Jeroen, and van Woudenberg, René. 2017. “The Epistemic Status of Evolutionary Theory.” Theology and Science 15:454–472.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1981. “Why I Don’t Understand Substitutional Quantification.” Philosophical Studies 39:281–285.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 2009. Metaphysics. 3rd ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René. 2006. “Knowledge through Imagination.” Metaphilosophy 27:151–161.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René. 2009. “Ignorance and Force: Two Excusing Conditions for False Beliefs.” American Philosophical Quarterly 46:373–386.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René. 2014. “True Qualifiers for Qualified Truths.” Review of Metaphysics 68:3–36.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René. 2018a. “An Epistemological Critique of Scientism.” In Scientism: Prospects and Problems, edited by de Ridder, Jeroen, Peels, Rik, and van Woudenberg, René, 167–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René. 2018b. “The Nature of the Humanities.” Philosophy 93:109–140.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René. 2021. “The Delineation of Common Sense.” In The Cambridge Companion to Common-Sense Philosophy, edited by Peels, Rik and van Woudenberg, René, 161–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Woudenberg, René, and Peels, Rik. 2018. “The Metaphysics of Degrees.” European Journal of Philosophy 26:46–65.Google Scholar
Walsh, Dorothy. 1969. Literature and Knowledge. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, John. 2009. The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate. Westmont: IVP.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. 2009. Whose Community? Which Interpretation? Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. “Deciding to Believe.” In Problems of the Self, by Williams, Bernard, 136–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2001. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Timothy D. 2002. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Barbara. 1979. “Believing at Will.” Journal of Philosophy 76:243–256.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations. The German text, with an English translation by Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Rev. 4th ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Jeremy M., Kluender, Keith R., Levi, Dennis M., Bartoshuk, Linda M., Hertz, Rachel S., Klatzky, Roberta L., and Merfeld, Daniel M.. 2019. Sensation and Perception. International 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1995. Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1996. John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 2019. In This World of Wonders: Memoir of a Life in Learning. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Wynne, Clive D. L., and Udell, Monique A. R.. 2013. Animal Cognition: Evolution, Behavior and Cognition. London/New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda. 2001. “Recovering Understanding.” In Knowledge, Truth, and Duty, edited by Steup, Matthias, 235–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Jens. 2015. Hermeneutics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • René van Woudenberg, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Book: The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
  • Online publication: 03 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025171.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • René van Woudenberg, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Book: The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
  • Online publication: 03 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025171.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • René van Woudenberg, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
  • Book: The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
  • Online publication: 03 September 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025171.011
Available formats
×