Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:32:42.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Quo vadis Europa?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2023

Erik Jones
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence and The Johns Hopkins University, Maryland
Get access

Summary

Huge reductions in transportation and communication costs in the post-World War II era have increased the economic advantages and facilitated the formation of large markets. This benefits large and populous countries like the United States, China, India, and Brazil, and provides incentives to small countries to cooperate in creating large trade areas. The EU has been most successful in meeting this challenge. Its complex and unique multigovernance structure provides a common and encompassing bundle of market institutions and yet respects the member states’ political autonomy in sensitive policy and executive realms. Its success in promoting trade in goods, services, and capital has been such that until China's forceful entry in world markets in the early 2000s, globalization and Europeanization were virtually the same thing. The solidity of its architecture was evidenced in the 2008–14 period, as it weathered, certainly not without casualties, the Great Recession.

Consensus as the path of least resistance

European integration has proceeded largely through consensual decision-making by the EU member states (and rulings by the European Court of Justice). New members had to commit to and implement the acquis communautaire before joining. This consensus-based process has gradually vested competence and power in EU-level institutions in areas directly and indirectly related to market regulation and the circulation of goods, services, capital, and people.

European integration has thus followed a path of least resistance. Those competences and aspects of governance that are still left largely in the hands of the member states are to a significant extent those which neither citizens nor elites want to transfer to the supranational level (such as taxation) and those for which the citizens’ or their political and economic elites’ dominant preferences diverge the most and are most difficult to reconcile. For instance, whereas citizens in the EU's south tend to favor the strengthening of the EU's competence on issues pertaining to labor relations and welfare state provision, those in the EU's north oppose such strengthening; whereas citizens across the EU support the creation of a European army, the member states’ political elites are still dragging their feet. European integration in areas that remain largely under state control has also become more difficult because the EU has become a very big club.

Type
Chapter
Information
European Studies
Past, Present and Future
, pp. 143 - 146
Publisher: Agenda Publishing
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Quo vadis Europa?
  • Edited by Erik Jones, European University Institute, Florence and The Johns Hopkins University, Maryland
  • Book: European Studies
  • Online publication: 22 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781788212847.032
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Quo vadis Europa?
  • Edited by Erik Jones, European University Institute, Florence and The Johns Hopkins University, Maryland
  • Book: European Studies
  • Online publication: 22 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781788212847.032
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Quo vadis Europa?
  • Edited by Erik Jones, European University Institute, Florence and The Johns Hopkins University, Maryland
  • Book: European Studies
  • Online publication: 22 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781788212847.032
Available formats
×