Book contents
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I International Adjudication
- Part II Experiments in Dispute-Specific Adjudication
- Part III Context-Specific Redress Mechanisms
- Part IV The Quest for a Permanent Court
- 9 Saving Face
- 10 First to Rise and First to Fall
- 11 The Failure of the 1930 Tribunal of the British Commonwealth of Nations
- Part V Experiments in Specialised Courts
- Index
- References
9 - Saving Face
The Political Work of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1902–1914)
from Part IV - The Quest for a Permanent Court
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2019
Book contents
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I International Adjudication
- Part II Experiments in Dispute-Specific Adjudication
- Part III Context-Specific Redress Mechanisms
- Part IV The Quest for a Permanent Court
- 9 Saving Face
- 10 First to Rise and First to Fall
- 11 The Failure of the 1930 Tribunal of the British Commonwealth of Nations
- Part V Experiments in Specialised Courts
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in International AdjudicationHistorical Accounts, pp. 193 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Select Bibliography
Auswärtiges Amt, Die Grosse Politik der Europäischen Kabinette, 1871–1914 (Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte, 1922–1927).Google Scholar
Bösch, Frank, Öffentlichkeit Geheimnisse: Skandale, Politik und Medien in Deutschland und Grossbritannien 1880–1914 (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 2009).Google Scholar
Bosworth, R. J. B., Italy, the Least of the Great Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Brückenhaus, Daniel, Policing Transnational Protest: Liberal Imperialism and the Surveillance of Anticolonialists in Europe, 1905–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Calvin D., The United States and the Second Hague Conference (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Foreign Office, British Documents on the Origins of the War, 1898–1914 (London: HMSO, 1926–4).Google Scholar
Geppert, Dominik, Pressekriege: Öffentlichkeit und Diplomatie in den deutsch-britischen Beziehungen (1896–1912) (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluek, Alvin C. Jr., ‘Programmed Diplomacy: The Settlement of the North Atlantic Fisheries Question, 1907–1912’ (1976) 6 Acadienis 43–70.Google Scholar
Hedges, R. Y., ‘The Juridical Basis of Arbitration’ (1926) 7 British Yearbook of International Law 110–120.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Sheila Iris, ‘Great Britain and the First Hague Conference: An Episode in Internationalism’ (PhD diss., New York University, 1973).Google Scholar
Mamolea, Andrei, ‘The Myth of Legalism in U.S. Foreign Relations’ (PhD diss., IHEID, 2018).Google Scholar
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, Documents Diplomatiques Français 1871–1914 (Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1929–1938).Google Scholar
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, Conférence Internationale de la Paix: La Haye 18 mai–29 juillet 1899 (La Haye: Imprimerie Nationale, 1899).Google Scholar
Otte, Thomas G., ‘“An Altogether Unfortunate Affair”: Great Britain and the Daily Telegraph Affair’ (1994) 5 Diplomacy & Statecraft 296–333.Google Scholar
Politis, Nicolas, ‘The Work of the Hague Court’ (1911) 6 Judicial Settlement of International Disputes 3–17.Google Scholar
Scelle, Georges, ‘Une instance en révision devant la Cour de La Haye: L’affaire de la Orinoco Steamship Company’ (1911) 18 Revue générale de droit international public 164–202.Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael, Sovereign Defaults before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar