Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T02:42:31.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Experiments in Public Management Research

from Part I - Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

Oliver James
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Sebastian R. Jilke
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Gregg G. Van Ryzin
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Experiments in Public Management Research
Challenges and Contributions
, pp. 3 - 19
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. M. and Edwards, B. C. 2015. ‘Unfulfilled promise: laboratory experiments in public management research’. Public Management Review 17(10): 1518–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, J. and Pischke, J.-S. 2014. Mastering Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baekgaard, M., Baethge, C., Blom-Hansen, J., Dunlop, C. A., Esteve, M., Jakobsen, M., Kisida, B., Marvel, J., Moseley, A., Serritzlew, S., and Stewart, P., 2015. ‘Conducting experiments in public management research: a practical guide’. International Public Management Journal, 18(2): 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E. 2009. ‘The experimental approach to development economics’. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 151–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J., Morton, R., and Serritzlew, S., 2015. ‘Experiments in public management research’. International Public Management Journal, 18(2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, H. S., ed. 2006. Learning More from Social Experiments. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Broockman, D., Kalla, J., and Aronow, P. 2015. ‘Irregularities in LaCour (2014): A36–A38’. https://people.stanford.edu/dbroock/sites/default/files/broockman_kalla_aronow_lg_irregularities.pdf (last accessed 23 Feb 2016).Google Scholar
Bouwman, R. and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014: a systematic literature review and ways forward’. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2): 110–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Scott, P. 1992. ‘Laboratory experiments in public policy and management’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3): 293313.Google Scholar
Brewer, G. A. and Brewer, G. A. Jr. 2011. ‘Parsing public/private differences in work motivation and performance: an experimental study’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(s3): i347–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G. and Kuhn, P., 2011. ‘Lab labor: what can labor economists learn from the lab?Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 229330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A. 2008. ‘From the editors publishing laboratory research in AMJ: a question of when, not if’. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 616–20.Google Scholar
Dobel, J. P. 2005 Public management as ethics, in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L., and Pollitt, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156–81.Google Scholar
Drewry, G. 2003. Introduction: law and administration, in Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.) Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage, 257–9.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. eds. 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T., 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., and Pollitt, C. 2005. Afterword, in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L., and Pollitt, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 720–9.Google Scholar
Field, A. and Hole, G. 2002. How to Design and Report Experiments. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Frechette, G. R. and Schotter, A. 2015. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D. A. and Petitti, D. B. 2001. ‘Salt and blood pressure: conventional wisdom reconsidered’. Evaluation Review, 25(3): 267–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, D. 2010. Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., and DeMets, D. L. 2010. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (4th Edition). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S. and Green, D. P. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gill, J. and Meier, K. J. 2000. ‘Public administration research and practice: a methodological manifesto’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1): 157–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Leth Olsen, A., and Tummers, L. 2017. ‘Behavioral public administration: combining insights from public administration and psychology’. Public Administration Review, 77(1): 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G. W. and List, J. A. 2004. ‘Field experiments’. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4): 1009–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverland, M. and Yanow, D. 2012. ‘A hitchhiker’s guide to the public administration research universe: surviving conversations on methodologies and methods’. Public Administration Review, 72(3): 401–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2005. Public management: the word, the movement, the science, in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L., and Pollitt, C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 726.Google Scholar
Imbens, G. and Rubin, D. 2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. and Jensen, R. 2015. ‘Common method bias in public management studies’. International Public Management Journal, 18(1): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S. 2015. Essays on the Microfoundations of Competition and Choice in Public Service Delivery. PhD dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Jilke, S., Van de Walle, S., and Kim, S. 2016. ‘Generating usable knowledge through an experimental approach to public administration’. Public Administration Review, 76(1): 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S., Petrovsky, N., Meuleman, B., and James, O. 2016. ‘Measurement equivalence in replications of experiments: when and why it matters and guidance on how to determine equivalence’. Public Management Review (ahead-of-print).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D. and List, J. A. 2009. ‘Field experiments in economics: the past, the present, and the future’. European Economic Review, 53(1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. 1996. Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession. London: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Margetts, Helen Z. 2011. ‘Experiments for public management research’. Public Management Review, 13(2): 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J. N. S. 2006. Introduction to Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (2nd Edition). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNabb, D. E. 2015. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S. L. and Winship, C. 2014. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. B. and Williams, K. C. 2010. Experimental Political Science: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, D. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Toole, L. J. and Meier, K. J. 2015. ‘Public management, context, and performance: in quest of a more general theory’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25 (1): 237–56.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, J. L. 2012. ‘How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?Public Administration Review, 72(4): 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J., eds. 2003. Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raadschelders, J. C. 2011. ‘The future of the study of public administration: embedding research object and methodology in epistemology and ontology’. Public Administration Review, 71(6): 916–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remler, D. K. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2015. Research Methods in Practice: Strategies for Description and Causation (2nd Edition). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1946. ‘The proverbs of administration’. Public Administration Review, 6(1): 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. 2014. Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tummers, L., Olsen, A. L., Jilke, S., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘Introduction to the virtual issue on behavioral public administration’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, (2016): 13.Google Scholar
Van Thiel, S. 2014. Research Methods in Public Administration and Public Management: An Introduction. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R, James, O. and Brewer, G. A. 2017. ‘Replication, experiments and knowledge in public management research’. Public Management Review, 19(10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. 2015. ‘The science of public administration: problems, presumptions, progress, and possibilities’. Public Administration Review, 75(6): 795805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×