Bachrach, Asaf & Wagner, Michael. 2007. Syntactically driven cyclicity versus output–output correspondence: The case of adjunction in diminutive morphology. Presented at the 30th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Philadelphia, 24–26 February.Google Scholar

Bierwisch, Manfred. 2003. Heads, complements, adjuncts: Projections and saturation. In Lang, E., Maienborn, C. & Fabricius-Hansen, C. (eds.) Modifying Adjuncts. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 113–59.Google Scholar

Efremova, T. F. (Ефремова, Т. Ф.) (ed.) 2006. Современный толковый словарь русского языка [Sovremennyj tolkovyj slovar russkogo jazyka] [The modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. 3 volumes. Moscow: Ast, Astrel’.Google Scholar

Embick, David. 1998. Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface. In Harley, Heidi (ed.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 41–72.Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Ramchand, Gillian & Reiss, Charles (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289–324.Google Scholar

Fortin, Antonio. 2011. The morphology and semantics of expressive affixes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Bruening, Benjamin, Kang, Yoonjung & McGinnis, Martha (eds.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: Papers at the interface, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 425–49.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.) The View from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–76.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 275–88.Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon: Nominalizations, vocabulary items and the encyclopedia. In Harley, Heidi (ed.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 119–37.Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot International 4(4), 3–9.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2), 201–25.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words and things. Manuscript. New York University.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2007. Phases and words. In Choe, S. H. (ed.) Phases in the Theory of Grammar. Seoul: Dong-In Publishing, 191–222.Google Scholar

Melissaropoulou, Dimitra. 2015. Modern Greek. In Grandi, Nicola & Körtvélyessy, Lívia (eds.) Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 269–77.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson T. 1995. PP attachment and argumenthood. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 95–151.Google Scholar

Siddiqi, Daniel. 2010. Distributed morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7), 524–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2008. Form and function of expressive morphology: A case study of Russian. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2009. Form and function of expressive morphology: A case study of Russian. Russian Language Journal 59, 149–94.Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2014. Parameters of variation in the syntax of homophones. Poljarnyj vestnik: Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies 17, 46–73.Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2015. Syntactic variation in expressive size suffixes: A comparison of Russian, German, and Spanish. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 12(1), 2–21.Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2016. Expressives across languages: Form/function correlation. Annual Review of Linguistics 2, 293–324.Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2017. Syntactic variation in diminutive suffixes: Russian, Kolyma Yukaghir, and Itelmen. Languages 2(4), 1–23.Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga, Markopoulos, Giorgos & Spyropoulos, Vassilios. 2021. A morphosyntactic analysis of nominal expressive suffixes in Russian and Greek. The Linguistic Review 38(4), 645–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2006. Why should diminutives count? In Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., Huijbregts, R., Kleinhenz, U., & Koster, J. (eds.) Organizing Grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 669–79.Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2008. The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(3), 639–94.Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina & Steriopolo, Olga. 2007. Parameters of variation in the syntax of diminutives. In Radisic, Milica (ed.) Proceedings of the 2007 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference, 1–12.Google Scholar