Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:16:21.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11.1 - Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome

Scientific basis

from Section 2 - Fetal disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
Department of Fetal Medicine, University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) may complicate multiple pregnancies where there is vascular conjoining within the hemochorial placenta, most commonly in monochorionic twins. The disease has fascinated obstetric specialists since it was first described in 1875 [1] when it was recognized as a condition not amenable to treatment and with very high perinatal loss rates. Since that time, this condition has offered many academic challenges. This is not only in terms of understanding the underlying pathophysiology but also a clinical challenge, in attempting to alter the clinical course of a condition that affects 10–15% of monochorionic twins. This is with a “backdrop” of a condition whose natural outcome would be at least 90% perinatal loss rates and very high (>50%) neuromorbidity in any surviving babies [2, 3].

TTTS is a relatively unusual condition as genetically concordant (i.e., monozygous) twins develop phenotypically discordant features as a consequence of monochorionic placentation and the conjoined angioarchitecture (see Chapter 11.2). In monozygous twins, placentation is dependent on the timing of the zygote splitting, post-fertilization of a single ovum and sperm. If this occurs after 72 hours, then a single placental disk develops, most commonly with two amnions. The “splitting” of the single cellular mass forms the most well-developed hypothesis in the formation of monozygous twins but a “co-dominant axis theory” (with the development of more than a single organizing axis) also exists. Whatever the mechanism, it is in these monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins that TTTS commonly develops, complicating 20% overall and 10% severely (the clinical features of which are usually apparent by the mid-trimester) [3]. However, more rarely, this complication may occur in monochorionic, monoamniotic twin pregnancies when splitting of a single cellular mass occurs (days post-fertilization) (Figure 11.1.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 145 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schatz, F. Klinische Beiträge zur Physiologie des Fetus. Hirschwald, Berlin, 1900.
Berghella, V, Kaufmann, M. Natural history of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Reprod Med 2001;46(5):480–4.Google Scholar
Lewi, L, Jani, J, Blickstein, I, et al. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(5):514–18.Google Scholar
Denbow, ML, Welsh, AW, Taylor, MJ, et al. Twin fetuses: intravascular microbubble US contrast agent administration – early experience. Radiology 2000;214(3):724–8.Google Scholar
Gardiner, HM. Early changes in vascular dynamics in relation to twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Twin Res 2001;4(5):371–7.Google Scholar
Charnock-Jones, DS, Kaufmann, P, Mayhew, TM. Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. I. Molecular regulation. Placenta 2004;25(2–3):103–13.Google Scholar
Mayhew, TM, Charnock-Jones, DS, Kaufmann, P. Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. III. Changes in complicated pregnancies. Placenta 2004;25(2–3):127–39.Google Scholar
Bdolah, Y, Lam, C, Rajakumar, A, et al. Twin pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: bigger placenta or relative ischemia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(4):428–6.Google Scholar
Machin, G, Still, K, Lalani, T. Correlations of placental vascular anatomy and clinical outcomes in 69 monochorionic twin pregnancies. Am J Med Genet 1996;61(3):229–36.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Talbert, D, Fisk, NM. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome results from dynamic asymmetrical reduction in placental anastomoses: a hypothesis. Placenta 2001;22(5):383–91.Google Scholar
Bajoria, R, Wigglesworth, J, Fisk, NM. Angioarchitecture of monochorionic placentas in relation to the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(3):856–63.Google Scholar
Umur, A, Van Gemert, MJC, Nikkels, PGJ, Ross, MG. Monochorionic twins and twin-twin transfusion syndrome: the protective role of arterio-arterial anastomoses. Placenta 2002;23(2–3):201–9.Google Scholar
Denbow, ML, Cox, P, Taylor, M, Hammal, DM, Fisk, NM. Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(2):417–26.Google Scholar
De Paepe, ME, Shapiro, S, Greco, D, et al. Placental markers of twin-to twin transfusion syndrome in diamniotic-monochorionic twins: a morphometric analysis of deep artery-to vein anastomoses. Placenta 2010;31(4):269–76.Google Scholar
Taylor, MJ, Denbow, ML, Duncan, KR, Overton, TG, Fisk, NM. Antenatal factors at diagnosis that predict outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1023–8.Google Scholar
Fries, MH, Goldstein, RB, Kilpatrick, SJ, et al. The role of velamentous cord insertion in the etiology of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:569–74.Google Scholar
Machin, GA. Velamentous cord insertion in monochorionic twin gestation. An added risk factor. J Reprod Med 1997;42:785–9.Google Scholar
Lopriore, E, Sueters, M, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Velamentous cord insertion and unequal placental territories in monochorionic twins with and without twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196(2):159.e1–5.Google Scholar
Jain, V, Fisk, NM. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004;47:181–202.Google Scholar
Umur, A, Van Gemert, MJC, Ross, MG. Amniotic fluid and hemodynamic model in monochorionic twin pregnancies and twin-twin transfusion syndrome. AmJ Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2001;280(5):R1499–R1509.Google Scholar
van Gemert, MJ, Sterenborg, HJ. Haemodynamic model of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Placenta 1998;19(2–3):195–208.Google Scholar
van Gemert, MJ, Scherjon, SA, Major, AL, Borst, C. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Three possible pathophysiologic mechanisms. J Reprod Med 1997;42(11):708–14.Google Scholar
Denbow, ML, Fisk, NM. The consequences of monochorionic placentation. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1998;12(1):37–51.Google Scholar
Tammela, T, Enholm, B, Alitalo, K, Paavonen, K. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factors. Cardiovasc Res 2005;65(3):550–63.Google Scholar
de Villiers, S, Slaghekke, F, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Arterio-arterial vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin placentas with and without twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Placenta 2012;33(3):227–9.Google Scholar
Zhang, EG, Smith, SK, Baker, PN, Charnock-Jones, DS. The regulation and localization of angiopoietin-1, -2, and their receptor Tie2 in normal and pathologic human placentae. Mol Med 2001;7(9):624–35.Google Scholar
Maisonpierre, PC, Suri, C, Jones, PF, et al. Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science 1997;277(5322):55–60.Google Scholar
St-Jacques, S, Forte, M, Lye, SJ, Letarte, M. Localization of endoglin, a transforming growth factor-beta binding protein, and of CD44 and integrins in placenta during the first trimester of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1994;51(3):405–13.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, P, Mayhew, TM, Charnock-Jones, DS. Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. II. Changes during normal pregnancy. Placenta 2004;25(2–3):114–26.Google Scholar
Burton, GJ, Charnock-Jones, DS, Jauniaux, E. Regulation of vascular growth and function in the human placenta. Reproduction 2009;138(6):895–902.Google Scholar
Karumanchi, SA, Bdolah, Y. Hypoxia and sFlt-1 in preeclampsia: the “chicken-and-egg” question. Endocrinology 2004;145(11):4835–7.Google Scholar
Venkatesha, S, Toporsian, M, Lam, C, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med 2006;12(6):642–9.Google Scholar
Levine, RJ, Qian, C, Maynard, SE, et al. Serum sFlt1 concentration during preeclampsia and mid trimester blood pressure in healthy nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194(4):1034–41.Google Scholar
Moore Simas, TA, Crawford, SL, Solitro, MJ, et al. Angiogenic factors for the prediction of preeclampsia in high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197(3):244–8.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Nien, JK, Espinoza, J, et al. A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21(1):9–23.Google Scholar
Chaiworapongsa, T, Romero, R, Gotsch, F, et al. Low maternal concentrations of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 in preeclampsia and small for gestational age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21(1):41–52.Google Scholar
Gotsch, F, Romero, R, Kusanovic, JP, et al. Preeclampsia and small-for-gestational age are associated with decreased concentrations of a factor involved in angiogenesis: soluble Tie-2. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21(6):389–402.Google Scholar
Crispi, F, Dominguez, C, Llurba, E, et al. Placental angiogenic growth factors and uterine artery Doppler findings for characterization of different subsets in preeclampsia and in isolated intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195(1):201–7.Google Scholar
Girardi, G, Yarilin, D, Thurman, JM, Holers, VM, Salmon, JE. Complement activation induces dysregulation of angiogenic factors and causes fetal rejection and growth restriction. J Exp Med 2006;203(9):2165–75.Google Scholar
Padavala, S, Pope, N, Baker, P, Crocker, I. An imbalance between vascular endothelial growth factor and its soluble receptor in placental villous explants of intrauterine growth-restricted pregnancies. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2006;13(1):40–7.Google Scholar
Espinoza, J, Chaiworapongsa, T, Romero, R, et al. Unexplained fetal death: another anti-angiogenic state. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20(7):495–507.Google Scholar
Kumazaki, K, Nakayama, M, Suehara, N, Wada, Y. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, placental growth factor, and their receptors Flt-1 and KDR in human placenta under pathologic conditions. Hum Pathol 2002;33(11):1069–77.Google Scholar
Kusanovic, JP, Romero, R, Espinoza, J, et al. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an antiangiogenic state? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(4):382–8.Google Scholar
Fox, CE, Lash, GE, Pretlove, SJ, et al. Maternal plasma and amniotic fluid angiogenic factors and their receptors in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35(6):695–701.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999;19(8 Pt 1):550–5.Google Scholar
Galea, P, Barigye, O, Wee, L, et al. The placenta contributes to activation of the renin angiotensin system in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Placenta 2008;29(8):734–42.Google Scholar
Barrea, C, Alkazaleh, F, Ryan, G, et al. Prenatal cardiovascular manifestations in the twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome recipients and the impact of therapeutic amnioreduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192(3):892–902.Google Scholar
Karatza, AA, Wolfenden, JL, Taylor, MJO, et al. Influence of twin-twin transfusion syndrome on fetal cardiovascular structure and function: prospective case-control study of 136 monochorionic twin pregnancies. Heart 2002;88(3):271–7.Google Scholar
Gardiner, HM, Taylor, MJ, Karatza, A, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: the influence of intrauterine laser photocoagulation on arterial distensibility in childhood. Circulation 2003;107(14):1906–11.Google Scholar
Mahieu-Caputo, D, Salomon, LJ, Le, BJ, et al. Fetal hypertension: an insight into the pathogenesis of the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2003;23(8):640–5.Google Scholar
Taylor, GM, Peart, WS, Porter, KA, Zondek, LH, Zondek, T. Concentration and molecular forms of active and inactive renin in human fetal kidney, amniotic fluid and adrenal gland: evidence for renin-angiotensin system hyperactivity in 2nd trimester of pregnancy. J Hypertens 1986;4(1):121–9.Google Scholar
Paul, M, Poyan, MA, Kreutz, R. Physiology of local renin-angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev 2006;86(3):747–803.Google Scholar
Kilby, MD, Platt, C, Whittle, MJ, Oxley, J, Lindop, GB. Renin gene expression in fetal kidneys of pregnancies complicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2001;4(2):175–9.Google Scholar
Wee, LY, Sullivan, M, Humphries, K, Fisk, NM. Longitudinal blood flow in shared (arteriovenous anastomoses) and non-shared cotyledons in monochorionic placentae. Placenta 2007;28(5–6):516–22.Google Scholar
Mahieu-Caputo, D, Meulemans, A, Martinovic, J, et al. Paradoxic activation of the renin-angiotensin system in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: an explanation for cardiovascular disturbances in the recipient. Pediatr Res 2005;58(4):685–8.Google Scholar
Bajoria, R, Ward, S, Chatterjee, R. Natriuretic peptides in the pathogenesis of cardiac dysfunction in the recipient fetus of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(1):121–7.Google Scholar
Hynynen, MM, Khalil, RA. The vascular endothelin system in hypertension – recent patents and discoveries. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 2006;1(1):95–108.Google Scholar
Bajoria, R, Sullivan, M, Fisk, NM. Endothelin concentrations in monochorionic twins with severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Hum Reprod 1999;14(6):1614–18.Google Scholar
Bajoria, R, Ward, S, Chatterjee, R. Brain natriuretic peptide and endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of polyhydramnios-oligohydramnios in monochorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189(1):189–94.Google Scholar
Wilkins, MR, Redondo, J, Brown, LA. The natriuretic-peptide family. Lancet 1997;349(9061):1307–10.Google Scholar
Chen, HH, Burnett, JC. Natriuretic peptides in the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep 2000;2(3):198–205.Google Scholar
Butt, RP, Laurent, GJ, Bishop, JE. Mechanical load and polypeptide growth factors stimulate cardiac fibroblast activity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995;752:387–93.Google Scholar
Cao, L, Gardner, DG. Natriuretic peptides inhibit DNA synthesis in cardiac fibroblasts. Hypertension 1995;25(2):227–34.Google Scholar
Omland, T, Aakvaag, A, Bonarjee, VV, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. Comparison with plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide. Circulation 1996;93(11):1963–9.Google Scholar
Bajoria, R, Ward, S, Sooranna, SR. Atrial natriuretic peptide mediated polyuria: pathogenesis of polyhydramnios in the recipient twin of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Placenta 2001;22(8–9):716–24.Google Scholar
Kiowski, W, Sutsch, G, Hunziker, P, et al. Evidence for endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction in severe chronic heart failure. Lancet 1995;346(8977):732–6.Google Scholar
Yorikane, R, Sakai, S, Miyauchi, T, et al. Increased production of endothelin-1 in the hypertrophied rat heart due to pressure overload. FEBS Lett 1993;332(1–2):31–4.Google Scholar
Garcia, R, Lachance, D, Thibault, G. Positive inotropic action, natriuresis and atrial natriuretic factor release induced by endothelin in the conscious rat. J Hypertens 1990;8(8):725–31.Google Scholar
Kanno, K, Hirata, Y, Tsujino, M, et al. Up-regulation of ETB receptor subtype mRNA by angiotensin II in rat cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993;194(3):1282–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×