Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. 2009. ‘Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny’, Language Learning 59: 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adger, D. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Kasey, T. and Pérez-Leroux, A. T. 1998. ‘Second language acquisition of Spanish null subjects’, in Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. and O'Neil, W. (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition, pp. 161–85. Mahwah, N J: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Allen, S. 2001. ‘The importance of discourse-pragmatics in acquisition’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 23–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, R. W. 1978a. ‘The impoverished state of cross-sectional morpheme acquisition/accuracy methodology’, in Henning, C. (ed.), Proceedings of the Los Angeles second language research forum, pp. 308–20. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar

Andersen, R. W. 1978b. ‘An implicational model for second language research’, Language Learning 28: 221–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, R. W. 1983a. ‘Transfer to somewhere’, in Gass, S. and Selinker, L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning, pp. 177–201. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Andersen, R. W. (ed.) 1983b. Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Andersen, R. W. 1984. ‘What's gender good for, anyway?’, in Andersen, R. W. (ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 77–99. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Atkinson, M. 1992. Children's syntax: An introduction to Principles and Parameter Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ayoun, D. 1999. ‘Verb movement in French L2 acquisition’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, N., Madden, C. and Krashen, S. D. 1974. ‘Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning?’, Language Learning 24: 235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, M. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, M. 1982. ‘A landing site theory of movement rules’, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 1–38.Google Scholar

Barbosa, P. 2009. ‘Two kinds of subject pro’, Studia Linguistica 63: 2–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barreña, A. 1994. ‘Sobre la adquisición de la categoría funcional Comp en niños vascos’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), La adquisición del vasco y del castellano en niños bilingües, pp. 231–84. Madrid/Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar

Beck, M.-L. 1997. ‘Regular verbs, past tense, and frequency: Tracking down one potential source of NS/NNS syntactic competence differences’, Second Language Research 13: 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, M.-L. 1998. ‘L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the Local Impairment Hypothesis’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 311–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belletti, A. (ed.) 2004. Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.

Berwick, R. C., Abney, S. P. and Tenny, C. (eds.) 1991. Principle-based parsing: Computation and psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Biberauer, Th. (ed.) 2008. The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1990a. Language and species. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1990b. ‘Syntactic development: The brain just does it’. University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Unpublished paper.

Birdsong, D. 1992a. Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 1992b. ‘Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition’, Language 68: 706–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D. 1994. ‘Asymmetrical knowledge of ungrammaticality in SLA theory’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 463–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D. (ed.) 1999. Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Birdsong, D. 2004. ‘Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment’, in Davies, A. and Elder, C. (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics, pp. 82–105. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. 1987. ‘The logical problem of foreign language learning’. University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Manuscript.

Bley-Vroman, R. 1989. ‘What is the logical problem of foreign language learning?’, in Gass, S. M. and Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 41–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. 1990. ‘The logical problem of foreign language learning’, Linguistic Analysis 20: 3–49.Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. 2009. ‘The evolving context of the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. and Chaudron, C. 1990. ‘Second language processing of subordinate clauses and anaphora – first language and universal influences: A review of Flynn's research’, Language Learning 40: 245–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. W. and Ioup, G. L. 1988. ‘The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning’, Second Language Research 4: 1–32.Google Scholar

Blom, E. 2006. ‘Agreement inflection in child L2 Dutch’, in Belletti, A., Bennati, E., Chesi, C., DiDomenico, E. and Ferrari, I. (eds.), Language acquisition and development (Proceedings of GALA 2005). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. D. and Thráinsson, H. 1998. ‘Two heads aren't always better than one’, Syntax 1: 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohnacker, U. 2006. ‘When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2’, Second Language Research 22: 443–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonnesen, M. 2007. ‘The acquisition of questions in L1, adult L2 and child L2 in French’. University of Hamburg, Research Center on Multilingualism: Unpublished paper.

Bonnesen, M. 2008. ‘The acquisition of subject–verb-agreement and negation in early child L2 of French and German’. University of Hamburg, Research Center on Multilingualism: Unpublished paper.

Bonnesen, M. and Chilla, S. forthcoming. ‘The acquisition of questions in L2 German and French by children and adults’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

Borer, H. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brodmann, K. 1909. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde in den Principien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. 1983. ‘An exploration of morpheme-group interactions’, in Bailey, K. M., Long, M. H. and Peck, S. (eds.), Second language acquisition studies, pp. 25–40. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Brown, R. 1973. A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, M. K., Dulay, H. C. and Hernández, E. 1973. Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. J. and Schumann, J. H. 1978. ‘The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers’, in Hatch, E. (ed.), Second language acquisition, pp. 207–30. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Carlson, G. N. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (eds.) 1989. Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Carroll, S. E. 1989. ‘Language acquisition studies and a feasible theory of grammar’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34: 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. E. 1996. ‘Le point de départ: La notion d'input dans une théorie de l'acquisition d'une langue seconde’. Paper presented at the Journée ‘Processus d'acquisition en dialogue’, Université de Paris III – Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar

Carroll, S. E. 1999. ‘Input and SLA: “Adults” sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender’, Language Learning 49: 37–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. E. 2001. Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. E. 2002a. ‘I-learning’, in Foster-Cohen, S., Ruthenberg, T. and Poschen, M.-L. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 2, pp. 7–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Carroll, S. E. 2002b. ‘Induction in a modular learner’, Second Language Research 18: 224–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. E. 2004. ‘Segmentation: Learning how to “hear words” in the L2 speech stream’, Transactions of the Philological Society (Special issue: Empirical evidence and theories of representation in current research into second language acquisition) 10: 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. E. forthcoming. ‘Input processing in second language acquisition’, in Gullberg, M. and Williams, J. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. New York: Wiley.

Cazden, C. B. 1968. ‘The acquisition of noun and verb inflection’, Child Development 39: 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cazden, C. B., Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. J. and Schumann, J. H. 1975. Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults. Harvard University: Final Report, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar

Chaudron, C. 1985. ‘Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners’ processing of input', Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1959. ‘Review of B. F. Skinner's “Verbal Behavior”’, Language 35: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and mind: New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981a. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981b. ‘Principles and parameters in syntactic theory’, in Hornstein, N. and Lightfoot, D. (eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, pp. 32–75. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1988. ‘On the nature, use and acquisition of language’. Lecture given at Kyoto University.

Chomsky, N. 1989. ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 43–74.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000a. New horizons in the study of language and mind (with a foreword by Smith, N.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000b. ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework’, in Martin, R., Michaels, D. and Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, pp. 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. ‘Derivation by phase’, in Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (ed.) 2002. Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, G. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1982. Spracherwerb in der Kindheit: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1983. ‘Some more remarks on the acquisition of German negation’, Journal of Child Language 10: 465–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clahsen, H. 1984. ‘The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development’, in Andersen, R. W. (ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 219–42. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1986. ‘Verb inflection in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode’, Linguistics 24: 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1988a. ‘Kritische Phasen der Grammatikentwicklung: Eine Untersuchung zum Negationserwerb bei Kindern und Erwachsenen’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1988b. ‘Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults’, in Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, pp. 47–75. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1988c. Normale und gestörte Kindersprache: Linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morphologie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. 1991. ‘Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language’, Language Acquisition 1: 361–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Felser, C. 2006a. ‘Grammatical processing in language learners’, Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Felser, C. 2006b. ‘How native-like is non-native language processing?’, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 10: 564–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clahsen, H. and Hong, U. 1995. ‘Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: New evidence from reaction-time experiments’, Second Language Research 11: 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. M. and Pienemann, M. 1983. Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P. 1986. ‘The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order’, Second Language Research 2: 93–119.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P. 1989. ‘The UG paradox in L2 acquisition’, Second Language Research 5: 1–29.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P. 1996. ‘How adult second language learning differs from child first language development’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19: 721–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Penke, M. 1992. ‘The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, 181–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H., Penke, M. and Parodi, T. 1994. ‘Functional categories in early child German’, Language Acquisition 3: 395–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppieters, R. 1987. ‘Competence differences between native and near-native speakers’, Language 63: 544–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. 1967. ‘The significance of learner's errors’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 5: 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. 1971. ‘Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culicover, P. and Jackendoff, R. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtiss, S. 1977. Genie: A linguistic study of a modern-day ‘wild child’. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Ö. 1979. ‘Typology of sentence negation’, Linguistics 17: 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. 1874. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, 2nd edn. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., Mehler, J., Cohen, L., Paulescu, E., Perani, D., Moortele, P.-F., Lehéricy, S. and Bihan, D. 1997. ‘Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language’, NeuroReport 8: 3809–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeKeyser, R. 2000. ‘The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 499–533.Google Scholar

Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. and Anderson, B. 1997. ‘The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: The process–result distinction in English–French interlanguage grammars’, Language Acquisition 6: 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Déprez, V. and Pierce, A. 1993. ‘Negation and functional projections in early grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 25–67.Google Scholar

Villiers, J. 1992. ‘On the acquisition of functional categories: A general commentary’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, pp. 423–43. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villiers, J. and Villiers, P. 1973. ‘A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2: 267–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Döpke, S. 1992. One parent – one language: An interactional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. and Burt, M. K. 1972. ‘Goofing: An indicator of children's second language learning strategies’, Language Learning 22: 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. and Burt, M. K. 1973. ‘Should we teach children syntax?’, Language Learning 23: 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. and Burt, M. K. 1974. ‘Natural sequences in child second language acquisition’, Language Learning 24: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. and Burt, M. K. 1975. ‘A new approach to discovering universals of child language acquisition’, in Dato, D. (ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics, pp. 209–33. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K. and Krashen, S. 1982. Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

duPlessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L. 1987. ‘UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken’, Second Language Research 3: 56–75.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 1989. ‘Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emonds, J. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Emonds, J. 1978. ‘The verbal complex V’ – V in French', Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–75.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G. 1996. ‘Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19: 677–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. M. 1974. ‘Is second language learning like the first?’, TESOL Quarterly 8: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. 1993. ‘Sentence matching and processing in L2 development’, Second Language Research 9: 253–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. 1993/94. ‘On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development’, Language Acquisition 3: 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. 1994. ‘Optionality and the initial state in L2 development’, in Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B. D. (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, pp. 369–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. 1996. ‘Negation in early German–English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state’, Second Language Research 12: 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P. and West, C. 1997. ‘“Tom eats slowly cooked eggs”: Thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge’, Language Acquisition 3: 171–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. and Gregg, K. R. 1995. ‘“Et in Amygdala Ego”?: UG, (S)LA, and neurobiology’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. and Gregg, K. R. 1999. ‘Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: Divide et impera’, in Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, pp. 65–99. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eubank, L. and Schwartz, B. D. (eds.) 1996. Second Language Research: Special Issue on the L2 Initial State. London: Arnold.

Ezeizabarrena, M.-J. 1996. Adquisición de la morfología verbal en euskera y castellano por niños bilingües. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar

Felix, S. W. 1978. ‘Some differences between first and second language acquisition’, in Waterson, N. and Snow, C. (eds.), The development of communication, pp. 469–79. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Felix, S. W. 1982. Psycholinguistische Aspekte des Zweitsprachenerwerbs. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Felix, S. W. 1984. ‘Maturational aspects of Universal Grammar’, in Davies, A., Criper, C. and Howatt, A. (eds.), Interlanguage, pp. 133–61. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Felix, S. W. 1987. Cognition and language growth. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Felser, C. (ed.) 2005. ‘Experimental psycholinguistic approaches to second language acquisition’, Second Language Research 21: 95–7.CrossRef

Felser, C. and Roberts, L. 2007. ‘Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study’, Second Language Research 23: 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felser, C., Roberts, L., Gross, R. and Marinis, T. 2003. ‘The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English’, Applied Psycholinguistics 24: 453–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferdinand, A. 1996. The development of functional categories: The acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Ferdinand, A. 1997. ‘The development of phrase structure in child French’, in Coerts, J. A. and Hoop, H. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997 14, pp. 85–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fernández, E. 2003. Bilingual sentence processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flores, C. 2008. A competência sintáctica de falantes bilingues luso-alemães regressados a Portugal: Um estudo sobre erosão linguística. Universidade do Minho, Braga: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Flores, C. 2010. ‘The effect of age on language attrition: Evidence from bilingual returnees’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(4): 533–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, S. 1983. ‘Similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition: Setting the parameters of universal grammar’, in Rogers, D. and Sloboda, J. (eds.), Acquisition of symbolic skills, pp. 485–500. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, S. 1987. A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition: Experimental studies in anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, S. 1989. ‘The role of the head-initial/head-final parameter in the acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Spanish and Japanese speakers’, in Gass, S. M. and Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 89–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, S. 1996. ‘A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition’, in Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 121–58. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G. 1994. ‘Mapping from the initial state to the final state: The separation of universal principles and language-specific properties’, in Lust, B., Suñer, M. and Whitman, J. (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability, pp. 319–35. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. 1988. ‘Introduction’, in Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, pp. 1–24. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. D. 1998. ‘Unambiguous triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. D. 1999. ‘Learnability theory: Triggers for parsing with’, in Klein, E. C. and Martohardjono, G. (eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach, pp. 336–407. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Friederici, A. D. 2002. ‘Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing’, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 6: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fries, C. C. 1945. Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Gass, S. 1996. ‘Second language acquisition and linguistic theory: The role of language transfer’, in Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 317–45. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Genesee, F. 1989. ‘Early bilingual development, one language or two?’, Journal of Child Language 16: 161–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E. and Paradis, J. 1995. ‘Language differentiation in early bilingual development’, Journal of Child Language 22: 611–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Givón, T. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A. and Lund, K. 2001. ‘Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldbach, M. 1999. Spezifische und arbiträre leere Objekte. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Verlag.Google Scholar

Granfeldt, J. 2000. ‘The acquisition of the determiner phrase in bilingual and second language French’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granfeldt, J. and Schlyter, S. 2004. ‘Cliticisation in the acquisition of French as L1 and L2’, in Prévost, P. and Paradis, J. (eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts, pp. 333–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granfeldt, J., Schlyter, S. and Kihlstedt, M. 2007. ‘French as cL2, 2L1 and L1 in pre-school children’, Petites Études Romanes de Lund 24: 5–42.Google Scholar

Gregg, K. 1984. ‘Krashen's monitor and Occam's razor’, Applied Linguistics 5: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregg, K. 1996. ‘The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition’, in Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 49–81. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grondin, N. and White, L. 1996. ‘Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French’, Language Acquisition 5: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosjean, F. 2001. ‘The bilingual's language modes’, in Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, pp. 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Guasti, M. T. 2002. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guasti, M. T., Nespor, M., Christophe, A. and Ooyen, B. 2001. ‘Pre-lexical setting of the head complement parameter through prosody’, in Höhle, B. and Weissenborn, J. (eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition, Vol. 1, pp. 229–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, E. and Noonan, M. 1992. ‘Functional categories and language acquisition’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahne, A. and Friederici, A. D. 2001. ‘Processing a second language. Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related potentials', Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haider, H. 1991. ‘Die menschliche Sprachfähigkeit – exaptiv und kognitiv opak’, Kognitionswissenschaft 2: 11–26.Google Scholar

Haider, H. 1994. ‘“(Un-)heimliche Subjekte: Anmerkungen zur Pro-drop Causa”, im Osvaldo Jaeggli, Anschluß an die Lektüre und Safir, Kenneth J. (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter’, Linguistische Berichte 153: 372–85.Google Scholar

Håkansson, G. 1997. Against Full Transfer in SLA: Evidence from the acquisition of German word order by Scandinavian learners. Lund University, Department of Linguistics: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Håkansson, G. 2001. ‘Against Full Transfer: Evidence from Swedish learners of German’, Lund University: Department of Linguistics, Working Papers 48: 67–86.Google Scholar

Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M. and Sayehli, S. 2002. ‘Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing’, Second Language Research 18: 250–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harley, B. 1986. Age in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hatch, E. 1974. ‘Second language learning – universals?’, Working Papers on Bilingualism 3: 1–17.Google Scholar

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T.. 2002. ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’, Science 298: 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hawkins, R. 1994. ‘French accusative case assignment and second language acquisition’, Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 4: 37–69.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. 2001. Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. and Chan, C. Y. 1997. ‘The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis”’, Second Language Research 13: 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, R. and Franceschina, F. 2004. ‘Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish’, in Prévost, P. and Paradis, J. (eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories, pp. 175–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, R., Towell, R. and Bazergui, N. 1993. ‘Universal Grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English’, Second Language Research 9: 189–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haznedar, B. 1997. ‘L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: Evidence for L1 influence’, in Hughes, E., Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 245–56. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Haznedar, B. 2003. ‘The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP’, Second Language Research 19: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haznedar, B. and Gavruseva, E. (eds.) 2008. Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B. D. 1997. ‘Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition?’, in Hughes, E., Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 257–268. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemforth, B. 1993. Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung sprachlichen Wissens. Sankt Augustin: Infix.Google Scholar

Herschensohn, J. 2000. The second time round: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herschensohn, J. 2007. Language development and age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herschensohn, J. 2009. ‘Fundamental and gradient differences in language development’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 259–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilles, S. 1986. ‘Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter’, Second Language Research 2: 33–52.Google Scholar

Hilles, S. 1991. ‘Access to Universal Grammar in second language acquisition’, in Eubank, L. (ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, pp. 305–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinzelin, M.-O. 2003. ‘The acquisition of subjects in bilingual children: Pronoun use in Portuguese–German children’, in Müller, N. (ed.), (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism, pp. 107–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, T. and Jordens, P. 1994. ‘From adjunct to head’, in Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B. D. (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshop, pp. 119–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmberg, A. (ed.) 2009. ‘Partial pro-drop’, Special issue of Studia Linguistica 63.

Hong, U. 1995. Null-Subjekte im Erst- und Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung im Rahmen der Prinzipien- und Parametertheorie. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N., Nunes, J. and Grohmann, K. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houwer, A. 1995. ‘Bilingual language acquisition’, in Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The handbook of child language, pp. 219–50. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hulk, A. 1991. ‘Parameter setting and the acquisition of word order in L2 French’, Second Language Research 7: 1–34.Google Scholar

Hulk, A. 2000. ‘Non-selective access and activation in child bilingualism: The syntax’, in Döpke, S. (ed.), Cross-linguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism, pp. 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hulk, A. and Cornips, L. 2006. ‘Between 2L1 and child L2 acquisition’, in Lleó, C. (ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism, pp. 115–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulk, A. and Müller, N. 2000. ‘Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulstijn, J. 2002. ‘Towards a unified account of the representation, processing, and acquisition of a second language’, Second Language Research 18: 193–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyams, N. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyams, N. 1989. ‘The null subject parameter in language acquisition’, in Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. J. (eds.), The null subject parameter, pp. 215–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. 1977. ‘Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation’, Language Learning 27: 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. 1978. ‘A framework for the study of interlanguage continua’, Working Papers: Phonetics Laboratory/Department of Linguistics 16, University of Lund.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N. 2000. ‘Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none?’, Studia Linguistica 54: 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N. 2003. ‘Maturational constraints in second language acquisition’, in Doughty, C. and Long, M. H. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 539–88. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Iatridou, S. 1990. ‘About Agr(P)’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 551–77.Google Scholar

Ingram, D. 1989. First language acquisition: Method, description and explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., Tigi, M. El and Moselle, M. 1994. ‘Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isel, F. 2005. ‘First- and second-language processing: Cross-linguistic neurophysiological evidence’, Le langage et l'homme 40: 79–95.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 2001. ‘Review of W. H. Calvin and D. Bickerton, Lingua ex machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the human brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000’, Language 77: 569–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, B. 1995. ‘Dis-integrating perspectives of language acquisition: A response to Eubank and Gregg’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. J. (eds.) 1989. The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef

Jansen, B., Lalleman, J. and Muysken, P. 1981. ‘The alternation hypothesis: Acquisition of Dutch order by Turkish and Moroccan foreign workers’, Language Learning 31: 315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, J. 1992. ‘Critical period effects in second language acquisition: The effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence’, Language Learning 42: 217–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, J. and Newport, E. 1989. ‘Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language’, Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, J. and Newport, E. 1991. ‘Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language’, Cognition 39: 215–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordens, P. 1977. ‘Rules, grammatical intuitions and strategies’, Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 2: 5–76.Google Scholar

Jordens, P. 1980. ‘Interlanguage research: Interpretation or explanation’, Language Learning 30: 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordens, P. and Kellerman, E. 1981. ‘Investigations into the strategy of transfer in second language acquisition’, in Savard, J. J. and Laforge, L. (eds.), Actes du Vième Congrès International de Linguistique Appliquée, pp. 195–215. Quebec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar

Juffs, A. 1998a. ‘Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing’, Language Learning 48: 107–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. 1998b. ‘Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language processing’, Second Language Research 14: 406–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. 2005. ‘The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language’, Second Language Research 21: 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. and Harrington, M. 1995. ‘Parsing effects in second language sentence processing’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 483–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. and Harrington, M. 1996. ‘Garden path sentences and error data in second language processing research’, Language Learning 46: 286–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M. I., Svenkerud, V. Y. and Jusczyk, A. M. 1993. ‘Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words', Journal of Memory and Language 32: 402–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaltenbacher, M. 2001. Universal Grammar and parameter resetting in second language acquisition. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1979. A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kellerman, E. 1977. ‘Towards a characterisation of the strategy of transfer in second language learning’, Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 2: 58–145.Google Scholar

Kellerman, E. 1979. ‘Transfer and non-transfer: Where are we now?’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kellerman, E. 1987. Aspects of transferability in second language acquisition. Nijmegen: PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Kempen, G. and Hoenkamp, E. 1987. ‘An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation’, Cognitive Science 11: 201–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, K. H., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K.-M. and Hirsch, J. 1997. ‘Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages’, Nature 388: 171–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, E. 1999. ‘Just parsing through: Notes on the state of L2 processing research today’, in Klein, E. and Martohardjono, G. (eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach, pp. 197–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, W. and Perdue, C. (eds.) 1992. Utterance structure: Developing grammars again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Klein, W. and Perdue, C. 1993. ‘Utterance structure’, in Perdue, C. (ed.), Adult second language acquisition: The results, pp. 3–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, W. and Perdue, C. 1997. ‘The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?)’, Second Language Research 13(4): 301–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, E. and Bellugi, U. 1966. ‘Syntactic regularities in the speech of children’, in Lyons, J. and Wales, R. (eds.), Psycholinguistic papers, pp. 183–208. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Köpcke, K.-M. 1987. ‘Der Erwerb morphologischer Ausdrucksmittel durch L2-Lerner am Beispiel der Personalflexion’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 6: 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köppe, R. 1996. ‘Language differentiation in bilingual children: The development of grammatical and pragmatic competence’, Linguistics 34: 927–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köppe, R. 1997. Sprachentrennung im frühen bilingualen Erstspracherwerb: Französisch/Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Kouwenberg, S. 1992. ‘From OV to VO: Linguistic negotiation in the development of Berbice Dutch Creole’, Lingua 88: 263–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krashen, S. D. 1973. ‘Lateralization, language learning and the critical period: Some new evidence’, Language Learning 23: 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krashen, S. D. 1977. ‘Some issues relating to the Monitor Model’, in Brown, H., Yorio, C. and Crymes, R. (eds.), On TESOL '77, pp. 144–58. Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D., Madden, C. and Bailey, N. 1975. ‘Theoretical aspects of grammatical sequencing’, in Burt, M. K. and Dulay, H. C. (eds.), On TESOL '75: New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education, pp. 44–54. Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar

Krems, J. 1984. Erwartungsgeleitete Sprachverarbeitung: Computersimulierungen von Verstehensprozessen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kroffke, S. and Rothweiler, M. 2006. ‘Variation im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen durch Kinder mit türkischer Erstsprache’, in Vliegen, M. (ed.), Variation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerb: Akten des 39. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Amsterdam, pp. 145–54. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kroffke, S., Rothweiler, M. and Babur, E. 2007. ‘Turkish-German successive bilingual children: Age of onset and the development of German V2’. Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Hamburg, May 2007.

Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lakshmanan, U. 1991. ‘Morphological uniformity and null subjects in child second language acquisition’, in Eubank, L. (ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, pp. 389–410. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakshmanan, U. 1994. Universal Grammar in child second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakshmanan, U. 1995. ‘Child second language acquisition of syntax’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 301–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lardiere, D. 1998a. ‘Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar’, Second Language Research 14: 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lardiere, D. 1998b. ‘Parameter-resetting in morphology: Evidence from compounding’, in Beck, M.-L. (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge, pp. 283–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2000. ‘Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition’, in Archibald, J. (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, pp. 102–29. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2008. ‘Feature assembly in second language acquisition’, in Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H. and Goodluck, H. (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition, pp. 106–40. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2009. ‘Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition’, Second Language Research 25: 173–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lardiere, D. and Schwartz, B. D. 1997. ‘Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 327–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. 1975. The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult learners of English as a second language. University of Michigan: PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. H. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lebeaux, D. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA: PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, E. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Liceras, J. M. 1986. Linguistic theory and second language acquisition. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Liceras, J. M. 1989. ‘On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish’, in Gass, S. M. and Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 109–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liceras, J. M. 1997. ‘The now and then of L2 growing pains’, in Díaz, L. and Pérez-Vidal, C. (eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language, pp. 65–85. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar

Liceras, J. M., Díaz, L. and Maxwell, D. 1999. ‘Null subjects in non-native grammars’, in Klein, E. C and Martohardjono, G. (eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach, pp. 109–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, D. 1989. ‘The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, D. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. L. 1995. ‘Development of the capacity for spoken language’, in Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The handbook of child language, pp. 278–302. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Locke, J. L. 1997. ‘A theory of neurolinguistic development’, Brain and Language 58: 265–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Long, M. H. 1990. ‘Maturational constraints on language development’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, M. H. and Sato, C. J. 1984. ‘Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective’, in Davies, A., Criper, C. and Howatt, A. (eds.), Interlanguage, pp. 253–79. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Lust, B. 1988. ‘Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: Promises and problems in critically relating theory and empirical studies’, in Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, pp. 1–24. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Martohardjono, G. and Gair, J. 1993. ‘Apparent UG inaccessibility in second language acquisition: Misapplied principles or principled misapplications?’, in Eckman, F. (ed.), Confluence: Linguistics, second language acquisition and speech pathology, pp. 79–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazurkevich, I. 1984. ‘The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory’, Language Learning 49: 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, B. 1978. Second-language acquisition in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. 1966. ‘Developmental psycholinguistics’, in Smith, F. and Miller, G. (eds.), The genesis of language, pp. 15–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. and McNeill, N. B. 1968. ‘What does a child mean when he says “no”?’, in Zale, E. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the conference on language and language behavior, pp. 51–62. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.Google Scholar

Meillet, A. 1912. ‘L’évolution des formes grammaticales', Scientia 12: 384–400.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1977. ‘Linguistic simplification: A study of immigrant workers’ speech and foreigner talk', in Corder, S. P. and Roulet, E. (eds.), The notions of simplification, interlanguages and pidgins and their relation to second language pedagogy, pp. 88–113. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1983a. ‘Strategies of second language acquisition: More than one kind of simplification’, in Andersen, R. W. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition, pp. 120–57. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1983b. ‘An encounter of the third kind: Will the non-real interfere with what the learner does?’, in Andersen, R. W. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition, pp. 198–205. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1983c. ‘Transfer as a second-language strategy’, Language and Communication 3: 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1985. ‘Les phases initiales du développement des notions temporelles, aspectuelles et de modes d'action’, Lingua 66: 321–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1986. ‘Word order and case marking in early child language: Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German’, Linguistics 24: 123–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1987a. ‘Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural second language acquisition’, in Pfaff, C. W. (ed.), Cross-linguistic studies of language acquisition, pp. 206–24. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1987b. ‘A note on second language speech production’, in Dechert, H. W. and Raupach, M. (eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production, pp. 83–90. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1988. ‘Second language learners’ (limited) access to Universal Grammar'. Paper presented at the Eighth Second Language Research Forum. University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 3–6 March.

Meisel, J. M. 1989. ‘Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children’, in Hyltenstam, K. and Obler, L. (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity, and loss, pp. 13–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1990. ‘Infl-ection: Subjects and subject-verb agreement’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children, pp. 237–98. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1991. ‘Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language use: On some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition’, in Eubank, L. (ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, pp. 231–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1993. ‘Simultaneous first language acquisition: A window on early grammatical development’, DELTA 9 (No. Especial): 353–85.

Meisel, J. M. 1994a. ‘Getting FAT: Finiteness, Agreement and Tense in early grammars’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development, pp. 89–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1994b. ‘La adquisición de la negación en euskera y castellano’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), La adquisición del vasco y del castellano en niños bilingües, pp. 151–80. Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1995. ‘Parameters in acquisition’, in Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The handbook of child language, pp. 10–35. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1997a. ‘L'acquisition de la négation en langue première’, in Martinot, C. (ed.), Actes du Colloque international sur l'acquisition de la syntaxe en langue maternelle et en langue étrangère, pp. 190–222. Besançon: Annales Littéraires de l'Université de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1997b. ‘The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development’, Second Language Research 13(3): 227–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1997c. ‘The Basic Variety as an i-language’, Second Language Research 13: 374–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 1998. ‘Parametric change in language development: Psycholinguistic and historical perspectives on second language acquisition’, in González, J. Fernández and Santiago Guervós, J. (eds.), Issues in second language acquisition and learning, pp. 18–36. Valencia: Servei de Publicacions.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2000a. ‘Revisiting Universal Grammar’, DELTA 16 (No. Especial): 129–40.CrossRef

Meisel, J. M. 2000b. ‘On transfer at the initial state of L2 acquisition’, in Riemer, C. (ed.), Kognitive Aspekte des Lehrens und Lernens von Fremdsprachen – Cognitive aspects of foreign language learning and teaching. Festschrift für Willis J. Edmondson, pp. 186–206. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2001. ‘The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars’, in Cenoz, J. and Genesee, F. (eds.), Trends in bilingual acquisition, pp. 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2004. ‘The bilingual child’, in Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 91–113. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2007a. ‘The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language?’, Applied Psycholinguistics 28: 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2007b. ‘On autonomous syntactic development in multiple first language acquisition’, in Caunt-Nulton, H., Kulatilake, S. and Woo, I.-H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 26–45. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2008a. ‘Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition?’, in Haznedar, B. and Gavruseva, E. (eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective, pp. 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2008b. ‘Âge du début de l'acquisition successive du bilinguisme. Effets sur le développement grammatical’, in Kail, M., Fayol, M. and Hickman, M. (eds.), Apprentissage des langues premières et secondes, pp. 245–72. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. 2009. ‘Second language acquisition in early childhood’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28: 5–34.Google Scholar

Meisel, J. M. forthcoming. ‘Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14.

Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H. and Pienemann, M. 1981. ‘On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3: 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. and Ezeizabarrena, M.-J. 1996. ‘Subject-verb and object-verb agreement in early Basque’, in Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons, pp. 201–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. M. and Müller, N. 1992. ‘Finiteness and verb placement in early child grammars: Evidence from the simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, pp. 109–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, A. 1985. ‘The acquisition of German’, in Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1: The data, pp. 141–254. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Milon, J. 1974. ‘The development of negation in English by a second language learner’, TESOL Quarterly 8: 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möhring, A. 2001. ‘The acquisition of French by German pre-school children: An empirical investigation of gender assignment and gender agreement’, in Foster-Cohen, S. and Nizegorodcew, A. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 1, pp. 171–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Möhring, A. 2005. ‘Against full transfer during early phases of L2 acquisition: Evidence from German learners of French’, Working Papers in Multilingualism 63. Hamburg: Research Center on Multilingualism.Google Scholar

Möhring, A. and Meisel, J. M. 2003. ‘The verb-object parameter in simultaneous and successive acquisition of bilingualism’, in Müller, N. (ed.), (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism, pp. 293–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete acquisition: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, N. 1993. Komplexe Sätze: Der Erwerb von COMP und Wortstellungsmustern bei bilingualen Kindern (Französisch–Deutsch). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Müller, N. 1994a. ‘Gender and number agreement within DP’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development, pp. 53–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, N. 1994b. ‘Parameters cannot be reset: Evidence from the development of COMP’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development, pp. 235–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, N. 1996. ‘Subordinate clauses in second and first language acquisition: A case against parameters’. University of Hamburg: unpublished manuscript.

Müller, N. 1998. ‘Die Abfolge OV/VO und Nebensätze im Zweit- und Erstspracherwerb’, in Wegener, H. (ed.), Eine zweite Sprache lernen: Empirische Untersuchungen zum Zweitspracherwerb, pp. 89–116. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Neeleman, A. and Weerman, F. 1997. ‘L1 and L2 word order acquisition’, Language Acquisition 6: 125–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neeleman, A. and Weerman, F. 1999. Flexible syntax: A theory of case and arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nemser, W. 1971. ‘Approximative systems of foreign language learners’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholas, H. 1987. A comparative study of the acquisition of German as a first and as a second language. Melbourne, Monash University: Unpublished thesis.Google Scholar

Noyau, C. 1982. ‘French negation in the language of Spanish-speaking immigrant workers: Social acquisition/variability/transfer/individual systems’, European–North American Workshop on Cross-linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Lake Arrowhead, 1981.

Obler, L. K. and Gjerlow, K. 1999. Language and the brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ouhalla, J. 1991. Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oyama, S. 1973. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a second language. Harvard University: PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, D. 2005. ‘Reading-time studies of second language ambiguity resolution’, Second Language Research 21: 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papadopoulou, D. and Clahsen, H. 2003. ‘Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 501–28.Google Scholar

Paradis, J. and Genesee, F. 1996. ‘Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or Interdependent?’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paradis, M. 1994. ‘Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA’, in Ellis, N. (ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning, pp. 393–419. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paradis, M. 2009. Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, T. Z. 1979. ‘Some facts on negation: Wode's four-stage developmental theory of negation revisited’, Journal of Child Language 6: 147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parodi, T. 1998. Der Erwerb funktionaler Kategorien im Deutschen. Eine Untersuchung zum bilingualen Erstspracherwerb und zum Zweitspracherwerb. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Parodi, T., Schwartz, B. D. and Clahsen, H. 2004. ‘On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals’, Linguistics 42: 669–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penfield, W. and Roberts, L. 1959. Speech and brain mechanisms. New York: Athenaeum.Google Scholar

Perdue, C. (ed.) 1993a. Adult second language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Field methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Perdue, C. (ed.) 1993b. Adult second language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: The results, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Perdue, C. 1996. ‘Pre-basic varieties: The first stages of second language acquisition’, Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 55: 135–50.Google Scholar

Pfaff, C. W. 1992. ‘The issue of grammaticalization in early German second language’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfaff, C. W. and Portz, R. 1979. ‘Foreign children's acquisition of German: Universals versus interference’. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, 27–29 December.

Phinney, M. 1987. ‘The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition’, in Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.), Parameter setting, pp. 221–38. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1981. Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1984. ‘Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1998a. Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1998b. ‘Developmental dynamics in L1 and L2 acquisition: Processability theory and generative entrenchment’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. (ed.) 2005. Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S. and Håkansson, G. 2005. ‘Processability, typological constraints and L1 transfer’, in Pienemann, M. (ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory, pp. 86–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. and Håkansson, G. 1999. ‘A unified approach towards a theory of the development of Swedish as L2. A processability account’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 383–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienemann, M. and Håkansson, G. 2007. ‘Full transfer versus developmentally moderated transfer: A reply to Bohnacker’, Second Language Research 23: 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierantozzi, C. 2009. ‘The acquisition of word order: Comparing first language acquisition, (2)L1, child L2 and adult L2 acquisition’. University of Hamburg: Unpublished paper.

Pierce, A. E. 1992. Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platt, E. 1993. ‘Parameter-resetting in second language acquisition: A study of adult Spanish and Vietnamese learners of English’, in Eckman, F. R. (ed.). Confluence: Linguistics L2 acquisition and speech pathology, pp. 105–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, C. 1996. ‘The initial hypothesis of syntax: A minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition’, in Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons, pp. 369–414. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, C. and Holmberg, A. 1989. ‘The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages’, Scandinavian Working Papers in Linguistics 43: 51–76.Google Scholar

Poeppel, D. and Wexler, K. 1993. ‘The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German’, Language 69: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. ‘Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar

Powers, S. M. 1999. ‘(E)merging functional structure’. University of Potsdam: Unpublished paper.

Powers, S. M. 2001. ‘A minimalist account of phrase structure acquisition’, in Alexandrova, G. M. and Arnaudova, O. (eds.), The minimalist parameter, pp. 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prévost, P. and White, L. 2000a. ‘Accounting for morphological variation in second language acquisition: Truncation or missing inflection?’, in Friedemann, M.-A. and Rizzi, L. (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics, pp. 202–35. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Prévost, P. and White, L. 2000b. ‘Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement’, Second Language Research 16: 103–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pritchett, B. L. 1992. Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. 2002. ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, F. 1995. ‘What neurobiology can buy language theory: A response to Eubank and Gregg’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pulvermüller, F. and Schumann, J. H. 1994. ‘Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition’, Language Learning 44: 681–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, A. 1986. ‘Small children's small clauses’, Bangor Research Papers in Linguistics 1: 1–38.Google Scholar

Radford, A. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Radford, A. 1997. Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, A. 2004. Minimalist syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, J. 1990. ‘Catapults and pendulums: The mechanisms of language acquisition’, Linguistics 28: 1381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ravem, R. 1968. ‘Language acquisition in a second language environment’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 6: 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinecke, J. 1935/1969. Language and dialect in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Richards, J. 1971. ‘Error analysis and second language strategies’, Language Sciences 17: 12–22.Google Scholar

Riedel, A.-K. 2009. ‘Root infinitives in child L2 acquisition of French’. Working Paper 4, University of Hamburg, Research Center on Multilingualism.

Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1986. ‘Null objects and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1993/94. ‘Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives’, Language Acquisition 3 (4): 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1997. ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of grammar, pp. 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, L. (ed.) 2004. The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.

Roeper, T. 1992. ‘From the initial state to V2: Acquisition principles in action’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, pp. 333–70. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roeper, T. 1996. ‘Merger theory and formal features in acquisition’, in Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons, pp. 415–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roeper, T. 2007. The prism of grammar: How child language illuminates humanism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (A Bradford Book).Google Scholar

Roeper, T. and Weissenborn, J. 1990. ‘How to make parameters work: Comments on Valian’, in Frazier, L. and Villiers, J. (eds.), Language processing and language acquisition, pp. 147–62. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.) 1987. Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRef

Rosansky, E. 1976. Second language acquisition research: A question of methods. Harvard University: PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Rothweiler, M. 1993. Der Erwerb von Nebensätzen im Deutschen: Eine Pilotstudie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothweiler, M. 2006. ‘The acquisition of V2 and subordinate clauses in early successive acquisition of German’, in Lleó, C. (ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism, pp. 91–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, W. 1983. ‘Language typology and language transfer’, in Gass, S. and Selinker, L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning, pp. 358–70. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Sabourin, L. 2003. Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study. University of Groningen: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Saur, D., Baumgärtner, A., Möhring, A., Büchel, C., Bonnesen, M., Rose, M., Musso, M. and Meisel, J. M. 2009. ‘Word order processing in the bilingual brain’, Neuropsychologia 47: 158–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saussure, F. 1916/1975. Cours de linguistique générale, published by Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert, ed. Mauro, T., Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Say, T. 2001. Feature acquisition in bilingual child language development. University of Hamburg, Research Center on Multilingualism: Working Papers in Multilingualism.Google Scholar

Schachter, J. 1988. ‘Second language acquisition and its relation to universal grammar’, Applied Linguistics 9: 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, J. 1989. ‘Testing a proposed universal’, in Gass, S. and Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 73–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, J. 1990. ‘On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition’, Second Language Research 6: 93–124.Google Scholar

Schachter, J. 1996. ‘Maturation and the issue of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition’, in Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 159–93. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schachter, J. and Celce-Murcia, M. 1977. ‘Some reservations concerning error analysis’, TESOL Quarterly 11: 441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlyter, S. 1990. ‘The acquisition of tense and aspect’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children, pp. 87–121. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumann, J. 1978. The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Schumann, J. 1979. ‘The acquisition of English negation by speakers of Spanish: A review of the literature’, in Andersen, R. (ed.), The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages, pp. 3–32. Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar

Schumann, J. H. 1995. ‘Ad Minorem Theoriae Gloriam: A response to Eubank and Gregg’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. 1992. ‘Testing between UG-based and problem-solving models of L2A: Developmental sequence data’, Language Acquisition 2: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. 1993. ‘On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. 1996. ‘Parameters in non-native language acquisition’, in Jordens, P. and Lalleman, J. (eds.), Investigating second language acquisition, pp. 211–35. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. 1999. ‘Let's make up your mind: “Special nativist” perspectives on language, modularity of mind, and nonnative language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. 2004. ‘On child L2 development of syntax and morphology’, Lingue e Linguaggio 3: 97–132.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R. A. 1994. ‘Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage’, in Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B. D. (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshop, pp. 317–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R. A. 1996. ‘L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model’, Second Language Research 12: 40–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and Tomaselli, A. 1990. ‘Some implications from an analysis of German word order’, in Abraham, W., Kosmeijer, W. and Reuland, E. (eds.), Issues in German syntax, pp. 251–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Scovel, T. 1988. A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. 2003. ‘Automaticity and second languages’, in Doughty, C. and Long, M. H. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 382–408. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seliger, H. 1978. ‘Implications of a multiple critical period hypothesis for second language learning’, in Ritchie, W. (ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications, pp. 11–19. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. 1969. ‘Language transfer’, General Linguistics 9: 67–92.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. 1972. ‘Interlanguage’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selinker, L. 1992. Rediscovering Interlanguage. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. and Paoli, S. 2004. ‘Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatic interface: Subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharwood-Smith, M. and Kellerman, E. 1986. ‘Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition: An introduction’, in Kellerman, E. and Sharwood-Smith, M. (eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition, pp. 1–9. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. 2003. ‘Linguistic consequences of reduced input in bilingual first language acquisition’, in Montrul, S. and Ordóñez, F. (eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages, pp. 375–97. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 1972. ‘Chinook jargon: Language contact and the problem of multi-level generative systems’, Part I, Language 48: 378–406, Part II, Language 48: 596–625.

Singleton, D. 1989. Language acquisition: The age factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. and Lengyel, Z. (eds.) 1995. The age factor in second language acquisition: A critical look at the Critical Period Hypothesis. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slavoff, G. R. and Johnson, J. S. 1995. ‘The effects of age on the rate of learning a second language’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slobin, D. I. 1985. ‘Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity’, in Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues, pp. 1157–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. and Bever, T. G. 1982. ‘Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross-linguistic study of word order and inflections’, Cognition 12: 229–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, N. V. 1999. Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, N. V. 2000. Foreword to Chomsky, N., New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vi–xvi.Google Scholar

Smith, N. V. and Law, A. 2009. ‘On parametric (and non-parametric) variation’, Biolinguistics 3: 332–43.Google Scholar

Smith, N. V. and Tsimpli, I.-M. 1995. The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Snyder, W. 2001. ‘On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation’, Language 77: 324–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, W. 2007. Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sopata, A. 2008. ‘Finiteness in child second language acquisition’. Paper presented at the Colloquium on language acquisition and change: Across the lifespan and across generations. University of Hamburg, June 2008.

Sorace, A. 2000. ‘Differential effects of attrition in the L1syntax of near-native L2 speakers’, in Howell, C., Fish, S. and Keith-Lucas, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 719–25. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2003. ‘Near-nativeness’, in Doughty, C. and Long, M. H. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 130–51. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Speas, M. 1991. Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Stauble, A.-M. 1978. ‘The process of decreolization: A model for second language development’, Language Learning 28: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stauble, A.-M. 1984. ‘A comparison of a Spanish–English and a Japanese–English second language continuum: Negation and verb morphology’, in Andersen, R. W. (ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 323–53. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R., Bowen, J. and Martin, J. 1965. The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Stowell, T. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. MIT: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Stutterheim, C. 1986. Temporalität in der Zweitsprache: Eine Untersuchung zum Erwerb des Deutschen durch türkische Gastarbeiter. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Svenonius, P. (ed.) 2000. The derivation of VO and OV. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Thoma, D. and Tracy, R. 2006. ‘Deutsch als frühe Zweitsprache: Zweite Erstsprache?’, in Ahrenholz, B. (ed.), Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund: Spracherwerb und Fördermöglichkeiten, pp. 58–79. Freiburg i.B.: Fillibach.Google Scholar

Tomaselli, A. and Schwartz, B. D. 1990. ‘Analyzing the acquisition stages of negation in L2 German: Support for UG in adult SLA’, Second Language Research 6: 1–38.Google Scholar